1815 Battle of Waterloo: Napoleon's last battle, how it happened

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 апр 2024
  • Using new archaeological findings, first hand accounts of the battle, expert interviews and CGI and 3D animations this program helps us understand the dynamic elements of strategy and weather that led to Napoleon's historic defeat by the Duke of Wellington on the fields of Waterloo.
    Directors: Marianne Cramer and Guillain Depardieu
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 149

  • @soultraveller5027
    @soultraveller5027 20 дней назад +34

    Just, wanted to correct something in this documentary, there were no ''English only''in duke of wellington's army, they were british soldiers , meaning collectively all nations in the united kingdom fought as one, under the union jack flag,🇬🇧
    What, you got to remember after the battle which was as gruesome, as the battle itself, and typical of the Napoleonic era of warfare,
    There ,was no organized retrieval or system to collect the wounded from the battlefield, they were Litter Bearers, but was still a ad hoc, affair, the scale of casualties overwhelmed the litter bears task ,they were so many casualties, thousands of dead, dying, and wounded on both sides, that they were unable to be removed for days after,
    The lucky ones, if you can describe it as lucky ones , were stretchered off or walked off,, but what awaited them when they got to the field hospital , was another matter,
    Army surgeons, had to work quicky, bearing in mind there was no pain- relief drugs ,when amputations were performed, the speed and efficiency of the surgeon of cutting the limb off, and trimming the bone,and creating a flap to cover the stump was the best the unfortunate soldier could hope for.
    The rest, out there had to wait in the cold ,wet conditions , they were left for days, there thousands perished in agony,
    At night, came the locals from around the area, the ''scavengers'' they got amongst them, and picked clean the dead and wounded, the horrors didn't stop, the teeth were hacked out and the prized teeth were from the young soldiers because they had a full set ,even the wounded were not spared, even killed, theses teeth were worth a lot of money because they were used to make dentures for the wealthy , this is never mentioned in the aftermath of warfare, it's all about glory .

    • @Lee.Enfield-303
      @Lee.Enfield-303 18 дней назад +5

      I accept some of your points but there was a very great effort on the French side at least to deal with casualties, one of Napoleon's personal doctor's Larrey devised improved methods of recovering and treating casualties using purpose made ambulances. Plus, the "British" had surgeons working non stop at the field hospital at La Haie. So it wasn't as primitive as you suggest. Teeth weren't just obtained directly after the battle, although this is one of the horrors I often imagine about for those poor souls laying out in the fields once darkness fell. The burial pits were exhumed to use the bones in the fertiliser process years after the battle and thus teeth would have been easily obtained.
      So let's just say, these programs are entertaining and somewhat informative, but not always complete or accurate.

    • @soultraveller5027
      @soultraveller5027 18 дней назад +2

      @@Lee.Enfield-303 That's quite true that the french made great efforts looking after their wounded soldiers and sought to improve the french soldiers misery in better after care then the British did ,l believe the french organised a ambulance service of a kind to carry off the wounded too. In fact the British military medical services were no different all the way to the Crimean war 1853/56 38 years later.
      However, let's not paint a too brighter
      picture here, we are talking about the early 19th century still ,they were no drugs to relieve the soldiers pain . The experience was unimaginable .they suffered and endure having the limbs amputated , simple because there was no alternative. you or I cannot even comprehend the suffering back then, they endure because they had no choice , disease like Typhus was endemic, serious bacteria infection killed many, all was prevellant in abundance, the mortality rate after surgery was low 5% for a forearm to 35% for a thigh removed bacteria that lead to disease was not understood, in the context of war bacteria and disease was not proven untill 1884, by a German bacteriologist Robert Koch, , stomach wounds were untreatable and the soldier was left to die in agony.
      What am saying is I wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy enduring the suffering

    • @Lee.Enfield-303
      @Lee.Enfield-303 18 дней назад +1

      @@soultraveller5027 I aint painting any bright picture, I simply stated it wasn't as primitive as your initial comment stated. They, no matter what side or what era were discussing will always struggle with the numbers of casualties in a large scale operation or action.
      And we can comprehend some aspects of the suffering ! Have you never hurt yourself, seriously hurt yourself ? I recently broke my shoulder and went without any pain killers the night I did it and only mild painkillers for few days after. And I've been stabbed in the leg, didn't know I had until someone pointed out the blood. So I can imagine to a certain extent. But sock is one of the biggest killers on the battlefield. let's not forget the poor animals too, I've rad accounts that almost traumatised me.
      But I aint here for a ding dong 😀 I accept your points and after completely watching the documentary, I feel safe in advising others to look elsewhere, this one just skims the surface and doesn't stand up to scrutiny Cheers

    • @soultraveller5027
      @soultraveller5027 17 дней назад +2

      @@Lee.Enfield-303 Fair enough I wasn't implying anything that didmished your comment,I was ultimately at the end of the day looking at it from a historical perspective, in that yes medical care was sorta improving a little from past decades centuries of course but by no means great strides certainly not in my opinion.
      Yes ,of course I have been injured in my younger days, broken my femur due to a road accident a car knocking me off my bicycle, luckily for me it was a clean break no compilations like a compound break.
      The pain was noticeable ,after the endorphins released by my body wore off, apparently, I was a excellent patient and surprised I wasn't screaming and shouting while the Nurse was cutting of my brand new jeans.
      I ,must have a high pain threshold ,I didn't receive any pain relief until I was laid on a hospital trolley awaiting to be rolled into Theater, least from what I can recolate
      It was bad, but tolerable, the worst part was post opp, the intermittent muscle spasms occuring, a few days after surgery, was something I wasn't expecting, that was uncomfortable,which is a normal side effects apparently, after breaking a leg ,while surrounded by a steel cage and attached to pulleys wire and weights called a traction contraption.
      It was considered a serious injury even back in the 1950s so I was informed by a nurse due to infection specially compound fracture where the bone comes through the skin

    • @AlexanderJScheu
      @AlexanderJScheu 8 дней назад +2

      Later - Wellington want say - His Victory.. NO - it was German Prussia, Fürst Blücher, Commander, brought
      the Victory - with His Strategy and Tactic with His Brave.. Heroes Troops...

  • @Ap-cm7mx
    @Ap-cm7mx 6 дней назад +9

    Bones are rare. After Waterloo, more than 27K tons of human/animal bones from Napoleonic battlefields were imported through the port of Hull to be processed into fertilizer. The young soldiers still had good teeth and these were used to make dentures, they were called "Waterloo teeth" at the time. The British were called the vampires of Europe when all this happened.

    • @francoiselicker4775
      @francoiselicker4775 2 дня назад

      Ce sont les guerres financées par L'Angleterre et non celles de Napoléon comme la propagande anglaise le répétait inlassablement.

  • @douglasprewer7913
    @douglasprewer7913 10 дней назад +9

    Napoleon fielded 72,000 troops against Wellington's 68,000. It may not sound much of an advantage but he had 250 cannons and Wellington only had about 140 cannons if accounts are to be believed. If I was Wellington I too would have fought a defensive battle of attrition.

    • @cmourat1
      @cmourat1 8 дней назад +3

      Correct. I agree. Also, Wellington had less cannons, but more Prussians 😄

    • @J.B.29
      @J.B.29 5 дней назад +4

      Face facts. Wellington did not win Waterloo, Blucher and the Prussians did.

    • @phildavies7666
      @phildavies7666 5 дней назад

      Thats a bit like saying the Russians won WW2, ignoring the other allies. Wellington won the battle with Blucher as a team. Wellington fought a defensive battle against superior forces assuming Blucher would join. Wellington did not deny Bluchers impact on the battle

    • @iammattc1
      @iammattc1 3 дня назад +1

      @@J.B.29 Wellington fought the battle he wanted to fight. Napoleon fought the battle Wellington wanted to fight.

    • @J.B.29
      @J.B.29 3 дня назад +3

      @@iammattc1 and was losing until Blucher saved him.

  • @user-pb4gl5dh4p
    @user-pb4gl5dh4p 20 дней назад +8

    What is rather sordid is that the mass graves where the soldiers who died during the battle were buried were desecrated. After the looting of personal belongings, the teeth of the dead were used to supply the market for dentures of the time. Around 1820 several articles in English newspapers refer to the trade of bones from the battlefield, in order to be transformed into agricultural fertilizer. Besides, some isolated bones, like this skeleton of which the video speaks, were found, there are no common graves on the battlefield.

    • @smartbomb7202
      @smartbomb7202 18 дней назад

      gotta make a buck some how...don't panic it's organic

  • @TheRealSlimshadyyyyyy
    @TheRealSlimshadyyyyyy 10 дней назад +3

    Outstanding job my god sir, mhm yess indeed.. But that armor that was pierced by a cannonball was not that of a Rifleman, but that of a French cavalryman. A Cuirassier. Helpful tip mate!

  • @desmondstewart3552
    @desmondstewart3552 4 дня назад +2

    An italian man fighting as Emperor of the French fighting an Irishman, the Leader of a British Army in a Flemish area of Belgium

  • @elbailadorrojo8775
    @elbailadorrojo8775 6 дней назад +2

    Quite a good documentary from France without the usual incorrect claim of most British documentaries that Wellington was victorious by purposefully omitting that Wellington would have lost without the Prussians. Some corrections though: There was no Russian "Masterplan" to withdraw as very good described in the last researches of Historian Alexander Mikaberidze. And unfortunately, the filmmakers seemingly never served in the military. Boredom and inactivity is spread widely until today in every army and living conditions in campaign still are often unhealthy...living conditions in 18th century in general were bad for regular people and even much worse in the Royal Navy.

  • @RIcklacantina
    @RIcklacantina 18 дней назад +3

    why do you use pictures of another era and country in this clip (the execution scene at the beginning around minute 1.10)

    • @GavTatu
      @GavTatu 11 дней назад

      quick stock pics i guess ?

    • @RIcklacantina
      @RIcklacantina 11 дней назад +3

      @@GavTatu I think so too, but it lowers the quality of the vid so much, and it is such an interesting subject

  • @willvermeer7500
    @willvermeer7500 5 дней назад +2

    The British only had some 25,000 men at Waterloo, the rest of the 80,000 odd of Wellington's troops, where Dutch, Belgium and German troops.

    • @stephenhill545
      @stephenhill545 2 дня назад

      The British provided the only professional army of the era, supplemented by levies.

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +5

    Thankyou sir for showing this great Emperor documentary

  • @fessorjespersen5437
    @fessorjespersen5437 20 дней назад +4

    Explaining the loading process: "With the stick, he mixed it all together" 😂😂
    Nice try though 😉

    • @DonAbrams-hq7ln
      @DonAbrams-hq7ln 4 дня назад

      Not all ramrods were iron, wood prevailed for pistols.

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +2

    Sir does franch archaeologist found napoleon Bonapartes naval fleet in bottom of ocean

    • @PeterOConnell-pq6io
      @PeterOConnell-pq6io 9 дней назад

      Wooden ships of that era tended to burn on the surface or explode rather than sink intact. Metal and non-wooden artifacts have been recovered, but nothing recognizable as a ship wreck.

  • @Lee.Enfield-303
    @Lee.Enfield-303 18 дней назад +4

    43:29 A Rifleman wore that breast plate did he ? Good grief 😵‍💫

    • @loyalpiper
      @loyalpiper 15 дней назад +1

      No, he was a cavalryman.

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +2

    Sir in India mysour emperor Tippu sultans also got this type of gun Tippu sultan received guns by napoleon Bonaparte

  • @davidcollins2648
    @davidcollins2648 2 дня назад +1

    Not to nitpick but it was Marshal Blue-sure, not "bluer"

    • @timber750
      @timber750 18 часов назад

      More like "blue-xher".

  • @jaredfleagle6126
    @jaredfleagle6126 16 дней назад +12

    Just because the archeological remains of the fallen soldier suggest he was "small" and had a birth defect, does not mean he was frail lol. Those dudes would March miles with their gear as foot soldiers. Dude was probably more hard-core than 80% of males now

  • @kriserauw5970
    @kriserauw5970 16 часов назад

    As a Belgian I can say my country always has been a battlefield crushed between the great powers France, Germany and England. Napoleon was defeated in 1815 at Waterloo in a decisive battle witch led Europe in almost 100 years of peace until WW1 broke out in 1914 with millions of death on the western front especially around the Ypres salliant with 5 battles and the big offensive at Passchendale in 1917. Now 100 years later they still dig up tons of shells each year in Flanders fields. Then came WW2 with Germany occupying Belgium untill they had to retreat after the landings at Normandy and they had their last counteroffensive at the battle of the bulge in the Ardennes with many casualties again. In a way my country is a graveyard and we have many war cemeteries . We have peace now for many years but with NATO stationed in Brussels we are a target once again. Let’s pray it never comes to a big war again ✌️

  • @antoniomoreira5921
    @antoniomoreira5921 21 день назад +3

    I strongly recommend Schwerpunkt's Napoleonic warfare series as a complement

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +1

    Sir please show us biryani and Paris military schools that napoleon started his military education

  • @ENIGMAXII2112
    @ENIGMAXII2112 16 дней назад

    Thank you for this work..

  • @mikepotter5718
    @mikepotter5718 3 дня назад

    “They have ruined my battlefield.”

  • @robertwalker951
    @robertwalker951 2 дня назад

    Whats with the music in these kind of things ITS REVOLTING

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +6

    Napoleon Bonapartes is lion of 100 wars

  • @user-id1qw5fv1h
    @user-id1qw5fv1h День назад

    Какие 10 лет непрерывных побед?!

  • @galapagos4154
    @galapagos4154 19 дней назад +1

    Türkçe alt yazı desteği olmaması üzücü 😢

  • @Youtubechannel-po8cz
    @Youtubechannel-po8cz 19 дней назад +1

    Wellington commanded an allied army, British, German and Dutch.

    • @daniellastuart3145
      @daniellastuart3145 18 дней назад

      they was no German in the early 1800's they were Germanic independent stats yes

    • @Youtubechannel-po8cz
      @Youtubechannel-po8cz 18 дней назад +3

      @@daniellastuart3145 King's German Legion fought at Waterloo.

    • @raymondfitzgerald-kuhl5976
      @raymondfitzgerald-kuhl5976 18 дней назад +1

      Not German, Prussian. Germany was not a nation until 1872.

    • @Youtubechannel-po8cz
      @Youtubechannel-po8cz 17 дней назад +2

      @@raymondfitzgerald-kuhl5976 The Kings German Legion fought at Waterloo under Wellington.

    • @markgrootendorst8688
      @markgrootendorst8688 6 дней назад

      And Nassau, Brunswick and Hanoverian…..

  • @pakoutac
    @pakoutac 13 дней назад

    1815 battle at Ulm?!?

  • @s1nb4d59
    @s1nb4d59 21 день назад +4

    Bad narration and cheesy music to say the least,not a good doco about the battle of waterloo at all,most of the senseless comments below honestly seem to be bot generated.

  • @BobBlarneystone
    @BobBlarneystone 15 дней назад +2

    i read an article that stated that the bones of the dead soldiers were ground up for fertilizer. Is that so?

    • @lynnedelacy2841
      @lynnedelacy2841 15 дней назад +2

      Yes I believe so

    • @robinfereday6562
      @robinfereday6562 14 дней назад +1

      Yes it’s true that’s why their are very few skeletons from Waterloo

    • @user-ft8ej3nj2i
      @user-ft8ej3nj2i 8 дней назад

      Это какой же "дробилкой" в 19 веке можно было раздробить кости нескольких десятков тысяч павших воинов ?! А мясо на колбасу пускали ?! И свозить их надо было со всего поля в одно место ?! После всякой битвы всегда старались трупы захоронить, чтобы избежать эпидемии ! Для этого использовали всё, что только возможно : овраги, различные ямы и углубления, колодцы и т.д. Костедробилку придумали гораздо позже : западная "цивилизация" во главе с гитлером !

    • @markgrootendorst8688
      @markgrootendorst8688 6 дней назад

      No, they were merely used in the sugarindustry, and some as fertiliser.

  • @Rusty_Gold85
    @Rusty_Gold85 2 дня назад

    Allied ( Scottish, Kings German legion , Hanoverian , Dutch, Belgian , Nassau , Brunswicks Troops ) plus Prussians verses the French ( Some Dutch, Polish Swiss )

  • @kevinmurphy7218
    @kevinmurphy7218 10 дней назад

    Good visuals. That script needed editing. Nothing built on Waterloo since 1815 in the same breath as the Lion Mound, an artificial hill. "Months of fighting" to describe without anything further the yearlong long War of Liberation in Germany 1813 that sealed N's fate. Also "Blewher" for Bluecher. Yikes.

  • @robnewman6101
    @robnewman6101 21 день назад +3

    Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher.
    Prussian Army Field Marshal.

  • @lisaschuster686
    @lisaschuster686 16 часов назад

    Men who are short are not often “frail,” an conclusion he claims twice.

  • @francoiselicker4775
    @francoiselicker4775 2 дня назад +1

    Pendant ce temps,les banques anglaises se remplissaient...

  • @airstripone2419
    @airstripone2419 17 дней назад +5

    Napoleon's biggest mistake was making enemies of the British. He was doomed from that moment. What a fool.

    • @georgevongabain3802
      @georgevongabain3802 2 дня назад

      Exept for the Navy they played a minor part

    • @senolhakan9255
      @senolhakan9255 9 часов назад +1

      @@georgevongabain3802 but dont forget the money they sent to the anti-napoleon coalition...

  • @MegaRebel100
    @MegaRebel100 19 дней назад +1

    Holland a alie of Napolein ?? we were condered ,people were pressed in the army of napoleon ..so no allie

  • @iammattc1
    @iammattc1 3 дня назад

    "The Russians decided to side with the British" - no mention of the Continental System?
    The British largely just financed and supplied armies that were fighting against Napoleon rather than having their own armies in the field (there were exceptions including the long Peninsula Campaign in Spain and Portugal)
    So Napoleon decided to cut that source of funding from his enemies by isolating Britain from trade with Europe.
    Some countries ignored this (such as Portugal), Russia agreed to it then re-started open trade when their own economy was badly affected, and everyone else took part in smuggling.
    Russia going back to trading with Britain was why Napoleon invaded, the Russians didn't just randomly change sides!

    • @stephenhill545
      @stephenhill545 2 дня назад

      I thought the Russians were at war with the collective west.

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +1

    Sir please show us napoleon Bonapartes pyramid wars

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +1

    Sir napoleon Bonapartes he is my inspiration role model for every soldier sir please show us napoleon Bonapartes artifacts and his museum

  • @swiftymorgan3001
    @swiftymorgan3001 8 дней назад +1

    Yes and half of wellingtons army were Dutch Belgium and once fought for the french

  • @scottleft3672
    @scottleft3672 17 дней назад +1

    Not "Blue-er"....but BLOOKER......(BLÜCHER)...."BLOOKER...followed by horse neighing.

    • @trevor5213
      @trevor5213 3 дня назад

      Accents are not so important, einfach los quatschen, just keep talking.....

    • @iammattc1
      @iammattc1 3 дня назад

      And "King Lewis"

  • @Sugarmountaincondo
    @Sugarmountaincondo 5 дней назад

    I stopped watching at 3:50 in because this was not talking about Waterloo as the title suggested.

  • @robertwalker951
    @robertwalker951 2 дня назад

    It’s the horses i feel sorry for not the humans

  • @mwovlog
    @mwovlog 21 день назад

    Nice ❤❤❤

  • @davidfowler4741
    @davidfowler4741 6 дней назад

    This wasn't Napoleon's last battle.

  • @romakaverin7467
    @romakaverin7467 8 дней назад

    Поэтому они сходились

  • @monalizoelgrande2579
    @monalizoelgrande2579 21 день назад

    20🇨🇵24 AP🌹RIL ...°°°... ❤️* ^❤️ ^❤️*

  • @romakaverin7467
    @romakaverin7467 8 дней назад

    Самопал

  • @francoiselicker4775
    @francoiselicker4775 2 дня назад

    Les Français n'avaient ni flotte ,ni argent après le Directoire.Avec une flotte de taille,il aurait battu l'Angleterre maitresse des mers grâce au roi grand amateur de femmes jetées après usage..Henry huit ?

  • @romakaverin7467
    @romakaverin7467 8 дней назад

    Ю

  • @GOINGNOMAD
    @GOINGNOMAD 10 дней назад

    Loud terrible music under the narration spoiled it.

  • @petethefeet1461
    @petethefeet1461 20 дней назад

    less of the history lesson and more about the soldiers as in the title ...

  • @magnusmcgraw
    @magnusmcgraw 21 день назад +25

    Without Blücher and his "tall fellows," Wellington would have been defeated. By the way, the British have always managed to gain the support of other countries against their own declared enemies. "History is always written by the victor" Napoleon Bonaparte.

    • @soultraveller5027
      @soultraveller5027 21 день назад

      Hey muppet, we get it your not a big fan of the british yes well done sir, Wellington knew that you too, he knew more than half of his army were europeans including some his staff were inexperienced untried in battle, while a percentage of his best soldiers were sent to the north america during the 1812 war ,with the y anks , the british having set fire to the White House, while a Yank eeee army at the same time crossed into canada torching the place up cheers matey 😁🤣

    • @kylefrank9186
      @kylefrank9186 20 дней назад +12

      So true! The single truth that the British gets everyone on there side is because we’re right and just!👍🏻🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️

    • @ommsterlitz1805
      @ommsterlitz1805 19 дней назад +5

      gained support ??? They paid the equivalent of thousands of billions worth of gold to the coalitions countries to wage war against France for 30 years and all this gold was pillaged from India.

    • @soultraveller5027
      @soultraveller5027 19 дней назад +6

      Well done captain obvious yes Wellington know what he had to fight with and made the best of it.
      Yes over half his army were Europeans inexperienced unproven in battle ,as were half his staff his best troops were scattered around the world special north America defending Canada after the war of 1812 when an American army marched into Canada and torched the place while the British touched the white house good and proper b ellend 🤣

    • @daniellastuart3145
      @daniellastuart3145 18 дней назад +7

      i think you find it the other way round if it was not for the Wellington the Blucher would got he butt kicked, remember they lost both the battels ay Lingey and Wave and by the time Blucher army arrived at Waterloo in force the French army was all ready 80% defeated by Wellington

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 21 день назад +1

    I pray Jesus give the child for every franch parents like Emperor napoleon Bonaparte Amen

  • @SpunkmeyerSnr
    @SpunkmeyerSnr 3 дня назад +1

    So many mistakes in this video.
    Worse than the History Channel.

  • @robnewman6101
    @robnewman6101 21 день назад +2

    BOOOO Bonaparte! 😡😠👎

  • @hedgehopper9055
    @hedgehopper9055 8 дней назад

    Very annoing flickering images through this video, I lost interest after two minutes. Why doing this on purpose? Seems rather stupid..

  • @bradleydass3075
    @bradleydass3075 13 дней назад +1

    From time to time there’s a leader the world needs to be rid of. Napoleon is a classic case of this.
    Better to nip it in the bud early!

    • @stephanemouton7250
      @stephanemouton7250 9 дней назад

      not sure, Napoleon wasn't a bad leader, at that time he became what English made him become, for defense of France against all European Kingdom who wasn't found of French Revolution era and the end of monarch, so who knows, he have to fight for sure but what if English and others didn't attack him ?

    • @garymoore2535
      @garymoore2535 8 дней назад

      Napolean wasn't a bad leader 🙈 A vain dictator that declared himself Emporer and crowned himself Emporer because, in his own opinion there was nobody else good enough ! In Napoleans own words "When we started the whole of Europe was with us, now the whole of Europe is against us". The explanation is Napolean himself ......his maniacal self belief, constant threats of war unless his neighbours complied with his demands, coercion alienated every single one of his Allies. 🤮

    • @cmourat1
      @cmourat1 8 дней назад

      @@stephanemouton7250 Well, it's a little bit complicated, but he certainly wasn't THE MONSTER. Napoleon the Monster is a british invention

  • @user-ft8ej3nj2i
    @user-ft8ej3nj2i 8 дней назад

    Жаль, что Императору не удалось добраться до острова и не уничтожить наглосаксов, как государство-вампир ! История пошла бы совсем по другому пути развития. Многие последующие войны на состоялись бы вовсе ! Смешно слушать про "агрессивного" Наполеона, если учесть, что все коалиции, созданные кознями и золотом наглосаксов, были направлены на уничтожение главного конкурента на континенте - Франции.

  • @TRICK-OR-TREAT236
    @TRICK-OR-TREAT236 21 день назад

    OOPS ! WRONG VIDEO ................. I THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT ABBA. 😂 🤣 😂

    • @terryfletcher2886
      @terryfletcher2886 21 день назад +1

      😂😂😂😂at least you learn something 😂😂

  • @corfmatm7313
    @corfmatm7313 7 дней назад

    On s'en fout, on vous a battu au foot !

  • @thewhitedoncheadle8345
    @thewhitedoncheadle8345 6 дней назад +1

    who is bluer?

    • @iammattc1
      @iammattc1 3 дня назад

      Ask King Lewis, he might know.

    • @chriss.9060
      @chriss.9060 4 часа назад

      as mentioned 3 weeks ago : Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher Prussian Army Field Marshal (needs correct pronunciation)

  • @romakaverin7467
    @romakaverin7467 8 дней назад

    Самопал