I'm going to be honest, first time i watched (two years ago) everything I understood was a dude playing with a gyro, but after getting into magnetism, fusion, electronics... my thoughts were this guy knows the universe, and has a simple explanation of it.
He has a theory and uses big words to try hide the cracks ' Or holds the gyroscope differently!!! If he really knew the truth as he boldly states.. To earn income would he be crafting leather bags or building efficient generators !!! Come on bro Think about it...! Yeah he's informative But his theories are only theories Without something working and functional,!
@@richardlilley6274 Some are interested in greater things than "income", and given how most athletes/celebrities make way more than top professions in fields that actually matter, clearly it indicates nothing of value, as long as the person has a steady life without suffering in poverty.
@@WOWWOW-hk1tb yes I get your point Yet that doesn't explain why a man who says he can change the whole world with his physics and knowledge Is making purses and bags out of murdered animals... Excuses are what man makes best...! Sometimes there are no excuses friend yet we make them because we don't like the truth...
@@WOWWOW-hk1tb 2 homes a farm flash car grands worth of equipment.. is hardly poverty stricken friend He's likable and an interesting character and knows some stuff. He's also arrogant and controlling Good and bad in everyone friend We're hypocrits if we ignore one person's faults over another's who we condemn Simply because one has a smile we like and is jovial..
He replaces intuitive explanations with hundreds of undefined, unexplained terms he expects everyone to know. What is trans euclidean geometry supposed to be? The only explanations of it that I could find have come from his channel. The inverse of a 3D shape? What’s that supposed to mathematically / spatially mean?
+Theoria Apophasis Cool this may explain something i have observed at work. As an engineer we use magnetic squares to hold 2 pieces of metal together before tacking them in place. i noticed that sometimes the magnetic field doesn't do anything to the weld but especially with my big magnet the molten metal blows back in my face before it can cool and bind the 2 pieces. So today after watching this video i did an experiment. I got my big magnet which can hold about 1kg or more, laid it on its side like yours, placed a thin piece of flat steel on top and proceeded to weld across it and as i expected in the center of the magnet the weld pool settled normally and the closer i welded to the centrifugal divergence point at the edge of the magnet the more the weld was repelled and sprayed out on to the floor
For those of you not wanting to watch him repeat himself for 20 minutes and use big words to try to explain a rather simple concept. Magnets have a toroidal field surrounding them. These fields have a swirling vortex like movement in the middle of them (which is why the top will keep spinning in the center), but on the outside edges (while still at the same strength as the vortex part) it's not a vortex but a wide outward sweeping motion. This causes the top to stop spinning because the field movement or 'flow' if you will, is different there... yeah that's it. That's all he's trying to say with all this LOL
Only a lot more in depth and in a manner which even an idiot could understand. Only if they first accept that Einstein was a moron aside from a high IQ. “Special relativity” 🤦♂️ lol. Not rly how theory’s are created, but ok.
Why not just explain the right hand rule because the magnetic field is perpendicular to the electric field and a force on a conductor in a magnetic field generates an electric field the resulting force will either be in clockwise or ccw I.e. speeding it up or slowing it down based on the direction of the magnetic fields
He is obviously trying to make you familiar with the reasons as to why it happens. He is EXPLAINING how magnets work. Because we aren't told that in school. And it has huge implications. HUGE. If you are a truth seeker I suggest you actually listen to EVERYTHING he is trying to say and visualize it. Watch his other videos too until you understand magnetism and you will understand just HOW much we fucked up in science.
I chanced on watching one of his video some 3 years ago. He is extremely ingenious man. He was talking about on physics topic; very fascinating; something about quantum or relativity or so. But his knowledge was in depth. I was very impressed and had to drop my generalization about ppl having tattoos are bikers only. I was wrong. This man is something and he must be teaching in MIT or Berkley, or Rice Univ. Good man. I like him.
when i was looking at that Sacred Geometry stuff it made me feel like it was a drawing of the board of those very young children puzzle boards that have outlines for where the pieces go. It was showing that but for a field in the cosmos somewhere. But this video you made took me past that crude idea and up to the understanding of fields and their nature and what fits in it. THANK YOU VERY MUCH! I truly treasure this understanding and for showing it to me.
EXCELLENT. Torroidal Basics 101--for dummies. Personally, I loved it. Gives me a graphic understanding, I never learned in College Physics. The geometery is beyond most(by far) but I found this clarifying. SUBSCRIBED.
Please show that gyroscope doesn't slow down over center of magnet when angled perpedincular to magnet surface (wheel rotating around horizontal axis ) . If it slows down the same like on the edge than I have explanation for it
We´re in a world that whorships information rather than wisdom... this is just pure fresh air for our over (stupid) complicated minds. Thank you Ken for your direct, simple and neutral seek for answers
I was hooked before I started the video. I've been interested in magnetism all of my life. I used to take apart my toys just for the electric motors and any other parts I can use. I didn't want toys , I wanted chemistry , electronic and magnets. Awesome video and presentation.
All through school I was told I will be taught how magnets work next year. I was very disappointed to go to university to find out no one knows anything and I quit. It didn't help either that the idiots that I thought would be left behind at high school were in science class at uni. I appreciate your videos.
The real question is why are we learning that gravity is distortion of time celebrating Einstein and he s theory of “stupidity” disregarding Tesla and magnetism ?
Theoria: I'm beginning to see where you are going with this concept. Do you think it is possible that there is a momentum transfer between the field and the brass? The edge of the magnet "taking" momentum while the centripetal divergent part of the field imparts, or retains it? Do you think it would be possible to transfer momentum from one flywheel to another using the hybperboloid geometry?
Noting the brass tube and magnet experiment, I'd imagine that brass flywheel is, whilst it is in motion and therefore taking part in a complete dielectric circuit, if I am grasping the principles correctly that is. Alike the tube the motion, relative to available dielectric current where one is highly conductive, ie copper/brass, creates interaction, resulting in its own 'magnetic field', I'd estimate they'd be as oppositional poles. The result being that, relative to the centre it assists the spin, the 'drive', somewhat as although they turn against one another, that turn is pushing with the whirling toroidal field. At the outer edge the fields act as though two clockwork cogwheels turning against each other. That said I may not grasp it well.
Yes this is a dielectric interaction IE a forceful pole shift simply put. It has to occur between an already existing changing EM field and a dielectric and it is always opposition and braking. I used to build electric motors and we put the motors on massive aluminum plates that rotated and when dragging the magnets across the dielectric aluminum, it would make the aluminum wheel spin but it felt like I was dragging the magnets through water. Theoria, I’d love to see a video on phase conjugate dielectrics! I follow Dan winter on his videos as well. You two put together a perfect presentation for the unification of all things. Thank you for everything you do! I cannot believe the amazing things I have learned from you!
@@kennethkretschmer1027 I’m so happy to hear that! I honestly have stopped searching for new sources -guiltily- while following these two geniuses. They seem to answer pretty much all of my questions! I’m amazed though and I’m very happy you have found what you’re looking for!
@@brianburch1381 after getting into some of the deeper stuff it’s a lot tbh, but the geometry and bliss explanations seem spot on. Did some breathing already and had some progress already.
I still think it's Eddie current....if you have gyroscope continuously/endlessly in spin and perhaps even faster speed, the gyro disc will have heat build up (not. the spindle, the disc)
What material is the shaft of the gyroscope made of? Neither copper or aluminium are ferrous, how is the magnet able to effect the scope? I know questions with questions, but i never went to school.
Lol I’ve never seen someone take so long to say so little. I like your videos, I like to learn from you, but I have to be honest when I say you can do so much better. If you wish to take my advice, and turn what you might see as coal into gold, do the following; >trim the fat of your videos. You could of said what needed to be said in 10 minutes, if not 3. >stop being condescending to your audience. We’re not as stupid as you think. If we can understand you and are here learning from you we deserve the same respect you do. >saying “big words” or jargon makes you sound smart but leave those not in the know in the dust, and because we are watching YOU to learn we are, for the most part, not in the know. I wish you luck on your journey!
@@ibecoolman how so? I dont see have my comment could apply to myself. I dont make videos that I can trim fat on, nor do I have an audience to be condecending too. Even my comment was done out of kindness. Are you familiar with the pot calling the kettle black and what its supposed to mean? 👀
@@exister4959 lol. I dont think that I have ever seen someone take so long to say so little. I like your comments. I like to learn from you, but I have to be honest when i say that you can do such a better job now in this present time than you could do before to write comments that have less words than your comments in the past, and still get the same point to go from you to the person reading your comment. I'm also unaware that I am writing a novel to express a sentence worth of material to help you understand that pots and kettles are both black.
@@ibecoolman i wrote 5 sentences, 3 of wish were done in bullet point format all expressing 3 unique ideas. Im sorry you're upset but I won't say sorry that you're wrong. Maybe reading more than one sentence gives you a headache but slowly you should work yourself to two than maybe you can even read 5!!!!! I've watched this channel a lot I left the comment in earnest because I want this man to succeed. He has the habit of going in circles and also condescending his audience in every video and not doing so would be a huge boon to him. Have a happy new year!!!
The field at the side of the magnet is very high. The flux density is actually higher due to the flux attempting to go from north to south in as tight a return path as it can. The flux cannot touch or come together as it is always in repulsion to the next line of flux. Like poles repel and the lines do the same. The reason you are experiencing the loss of motion is called eddy current loss. When in the center of the magnet the gyro in a singular magnetic field in every direction it will be the same because you are in the center of the disc so it only sees the singular pole and the uniform density from center toward the edge is present. So the material sees no difference in flux density during rotation and no change in alignment of the dipole. Like north or south and it should be even more or less across the full surface of the material and seeing the same field density and no relaxing of the internal dipole as it is definitely one pole throughout its surface at any one point from center to edge. Now I don't know why the gyro should not eventually stop just due to entropy, I am assuming it does but I have never done this experiment using a gyro. However that is not the case with the flux at the edge of the magnet. The density of the magnetic field is different it is higher closer to the edge and the field is lower as you get away from the edge . So what is happening is that the spinning material is seeing more flux as it rotates closer to the edge and less flux is seen an inch or more from the edge. So flux is influencing the non magnetic material no longer with the same flux density uni-formally across the surface. As the spinning material is changing from high flux density to lower flux density at the max distance. The dipole is experiencing change and when it does it creates a loss or work is happening within the material, it's internal dipole which relaxes during rotation from the high to a low density field when farthest from the edge. As the gyro material internal dipole is forced into alignment with the increasing flux density it creates a drag as the internal dipole goes from non-alignment and higher flux density while aligning with the flux's north south field. Where the flux is lower furthest from the magnet and not as compacted as at the edge of the disc. The flux density is less as you get further away from the edge of the magnet. Therefore the gyro's dipole relaxes during rotation due to there being less flux but when it enters the higher density of flux closer to the edge of the disc the flux forces the gyro dipole to realign with the magnets flux. The power to force realignment creates a loss in its rotation as it resists alignment by pushing back against the incoming increase of flux which is being more compacted into the gyros material as it gets to the apex of density which continues to push back against the alignment. Overcoming the materials naturally relaxed dipole to align with the flux uses energy. It pushes against the field from the magnet and you see the rotational loss due to that pushing back or its resisting alignment. Look up Eddy currents. We used this property of the magnetic field for brakes on the Accelerator ride at Knott's Berry Farm in California. You can see a copper bar come up and down at the end of the ride while waiting in line. The braking is swift and is not to hard on the people. It also is used on various other projects for slowing, creating drag on other products like fishing spinners.
Sorry I am not wrong on this fact. You have a Gauss meter? if so is the probe transverse or axial?Are you looking at the surface or at a distance? Yes,it is agreed that the field is more or less the same across the surface but not at at a distance. To give you a set up the test from the side of magnet. it will depend upon the type of probe you have. Tell me the type. I can send you a process for testing your theory and the proof of what I am saying can be confirmed.
capt. you get the prize. this is correct and the difference in the flux density is why the gyro sees more flux and resistance is as you depicted in your drawing. Good job. Thank you very much.
rick Green I even left a long and a little emotional detailed explainition on the other video before i realized the author is a person who will just plug his ears and refuse to listen. ruclips.net/video/JauYH0omKIA/видео.html
***** first time I hear about that "rule book". Where can I get it? Joking aside, I teach my students to think, to reason, to understand. You, my friend, either had lazy teachers, or completely misunderstood them. By the way, science is exciting. It is just as you described it. I do hope you will get a chance to experience it the right way. One thing about Tesla... he would laugh in the face of the clown with the gyroscope.
when i set my frying pan on the center of my stove burner it will fry an egg ALL day long, when i set the pan on the side of the burner i get immediate cessation of egg frying... i like donuts
Great video! Small correction. The term for the magnetoreceptor, located in the retina, is cryptochrome not chromotomes, When disturbed a message is sent to the pineal gland via the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Subsequently melatonin production is inhibited. Your other video explained why blue light makes it react, due to the capacitance found in blue light. Could microwave frequencies also create capacitance in the human eye?
Where can I read more of this? I could explain scientifically the fascination induced by eye gazing in ancient hypnosis schools with effects on pineal gland and induced altered states of consciousness.
Very Good! Decriptions are not Explanations You are obviously Brilliant! This observation/conclusion is why I listen to you. You obviously know what your talking about! As a Physicist researcher - I discovered this principle as the main reason there are still unexplained issues in our world. I phrase it as: Descriptions are not Definitions! I sit at your feet - struggling to comprehend!
@@blatendcrude7570 bullets are made of lead, therfore nonmagnetic. but funny as hell. If the magnet is strong enough though, they could not shoot back due to the pull of the magnetic field effecting the eyes. "Look me in my good eye!" lol.
When you use the magnetic viewing film, at the begining, to show the dielectric inertial plane of the monster magnet. The dielectric inertial plane us much wider then the smaller magnets. So, the dielectric inertial plane of the Earth is miles wide?
@@BlahBlahBlahjoo our flat earth are you talking about,, with the dome over it with pretty lights in it? dood you know as much about the solar system as you do about brain surgey.
thats how you know they don't know what they are talking about in these conspiracy vids.... 95% of the time they don't show anything new or special. just a mind f*ck.
Frank North I know dude, could you imagine this guy having a real person to talk to? and even worse, being that person..... ughhhh... it's been said that a true teacher can explain things in ways that everyone can understand. and that will keep everyone interested. this guy uses very limited nomenclature...
kinetic blues He’s at best a midwit who is trying to sound like he is on a different level than everyone else. The fact that he’s accomplished absolutely nothing should by now have clued him in that he’s not nearly as intelligent as he would like us to believe. But of course that reality is out of his reach since he’s wrapped himself up in this delusional false view of himself. And trust me I am being generous when I call him a midwit.
pretty much useless repetition. it's a long video. practice it once or twice should be sufficient enough with his explanation, but he did it repeatedly which is boring for some people xD well, some of them may like that, but I prefer doing it to the point. 😁
I just ask 1,286 people to tell me anything more idiotic than calling Feynman stupid. One answer.... arguing with a wife. This dude needs to be deplatformed.
You can actually see the dreamcatcher pattern "etching" into the chrome surface. Really cool. U r lighting up that fire in me for experimentation again, for that i thank you. Few people can really do that. You appear to have an exceptionally indepth understanding of a few different interrelated sciences, perhaps a science as yet unnamed (like the relatively new science of archaioastronomy). I hope you find something as yet unknown.
I believe Ken is correct with his theory. My advice to anyone trying to understand this model for magnetism is to simply watch the chain of videos , one after another. It helps to take notes of the basic key terms he uses. Eventually the concept begins to make sense.
@@artvandelay3650 that's casting quite a large net buddy otherwise you are corrupt yourself though the reduction machine that is our brain probably won't give anyone true reality anytime soon so take my comment with a grain of salt lol
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION AT 4"47 HIS FINGER IS WHAT APPLIES THE MEENS OF IT STOPPING ,AS YOU SEE THE FINGER DEPRESSES JUST AFTER IT STOPS ,HE IS LIEING ,WOW!!!!
@@stephanedemers8590 yeah you saw it too... Disingenuous slight of hand giving it a little tweek... Hence I stopped watching Shouldn't have to have eyes up our ass when watching an experiment
Your comment shows that you are intimidated by his intelligence. I'm not intimidated. He's using the nomenclature used for this field. You should thank him for doing so. I'd you tried tipp research online without the proper terms yout won't get desired result.
The dude is calling feinman an idiot. That should put some things into perspective for you... Unmanifest LOL, if you have a you st, why haven't you broken the mould yet? Oh yeah, because your theories do not actually predict observable results. Give one instance where this mumbo jumbo takes you further than Fineman in understanding particle fields And how that knowledge would you to add something qualitative to quantum mechanical Theory which I'm assuming you don't ascribe to
Hence, proving my point that you can be the smartest guy in the world, and still be dumb as a box of rocks! Wisdom/intelligence any day, all day, week, months, and years to come! And his display of meism is evidence of that fact! Peaceout!
Since you asked for my thoughts: There is no magnetic field. All these effects are the result of the spatial shaping created by the movement of the electric field. Your continued reference to imaginary fields is a sorry compromise to past imaginary constructs because of the reactions of objects to the distortions in the space around the moving electric field potential (EFP) that is trapped by the structure of the magnet. Similar to your analogy that a vagina is a hole, the center/point of the pleasure and function of that organ isn't the space it can create. Your geometric lines and shapes that you project as a real magnetic field or lines of force are nothing more than stuff filling holes created by the collective aligned moving E-field. The basic E-Field (EF) structure of a spinning disc is simply a stable structure of the balancing EF forces that include the concentration and collapse of the EF Potential as it repels and circles and concentrates. In contrast it distorts space, which varies surrounding the spinning disc of EFP, which is variable across the radius of the disc. The imbalance is most concentrated at the center of the disc, where the force of the repelling EF is most intensely inwardly directed, and again has an imbalance at the edge of the magnet where the density and motivating forces are completely outwardly directed. Your spinning gyroscope is creating a moving EFP that interacts more sensitively to the collective spinning EFP of the magnet. The braking effect is simply the imbalances of the misalignment resolving according to the physically less restrictive object. You will find that a smaller disc magnet will not sit anywhere on the larger disc magnet, it will align itself edge to edge on the top surface or flip and align at the domain wall. This is because the real interaction isn't any distortion of space, but rather the moving EFP forces. Also steel balls will be drawn to the least neutralized moving EFP on the disc, the edge. And one last point: spin your gyro backwards, or flip it and now it's contrary to the spinning EFP, and it will stop at the center too. Even faster than at your angle at the edge. The holes or distortions created by the MEFP only affect the compactness of particles in motion as they form solid structures as in liquid to solid transitions or developing living structures, or formation of planets. Which emphasizes that the Earth's EF has been changing over it's lifetime as the Earth is expanding without adding more matter and life forms transitioning from massive giants and dinosaurs to the smaller beasts and people of today. Thanks for asking... When I have the patience to overlook your anger, I find your work quite illuminating and inspirational. You might check out distinti's work on RUclips and .com He has some matrix vector analysis that may just quantify what you're intuitively identifying as both time and spatial differential influences of E-fields. Cheers, B
cloud0123 My current thoughts, above are my own. They bring together the quantitative work of Distinti on the actual field behavior, EP Dollard on that part of E fields that actually repels, the dielectric field (however, this is not his interpretation), Ken Wheeler et.al. Re. Work on how the polar fields of magnets, which also correlate to the strength of the electric field of moving charges (there is an imbalance in polar charge fields because the source fields are all aligned and balance axially, aligned but not balanced radially and the field is directional in nature). Because the magnetic particles are locked in place before they are aligned, they can't move to balance all the forces. The South Pole is simply more uniform than the North Pole, this compacts it compared to the North. The bit on the expanding earth is simply an application of these basic observed behaviors which are demonstrated in the Ebner Effect et.al. (Numerous patents) who show intense fields or strong magnetic fields change the mass and atomic packing density and therefor how DNA expresses itself, even in animals. Modern animals develop into extinct species when eggs and embryos are put in high electric field or South Pole pseudo fields. The EU theory may embrace this, certainly the theory that e fields influence all things in the Universe is consistent. And the movement of Earth into its present orbit requires a change in our localized electric field from when we were orbiting with Saturn, Venus, and Mars around the Sun on a much smaller planet. It is one Universe and one theory of one field with two directional properties makes all this possible. Even the Aether may simply be the combination of all the local fields into a Universal field. So far I haven't seen it do anything beyond a background field couldn't do. A great scientist isn't afraid to be wrong and happily throws away an entire theory when it fails. He's also constantly looking to disprove his current passion by poking at it ever more deeply. This is a proper application of sociopathic behavior. Recognize society need consistency and progress, that's where a great engineer applies the shattering truths of science into positive steps of growth. His biggest impediment is the capitalist, who will gladly sacrifice all hope of growth for more of what is today. Safety in reserves is all he knows because science failed to present anything from the universal field soon enough. And engineers haven't developed a safe transition, yet. Merry Christmas, enjoy the transition to a new growth period. Will this be the one?
I'm curious as to exactly what sort of "holes" your explanation fills that his does not? It almost appears to me as though you are simply using two different conventions to explain the same thing. Granted I have not spent the necessary time with your material to fully understand where it diverges; I haven't yet been presented with a question which would require me to restructure my understanding beyond what this man is explaining. Whereas my "education" is public school left me with many questions, these explanations make much more sense. (Theoria's) What sort of question or observation could his convention NOT explain, is what I am asking? What is the requirement which is not met? You could say "Oh well magnetic fields don't actually exist" and then go on to create a bunch of new conventions which essentially add up to "a magnetic field," appearing only to diverge in that you call it and all its components by some other name; but why?
Frank Lowe. Remember Fred Flintstone ; when he was driving to work and everything he passed ; the same scenery would keep going by in the background !!!!! Einstein said ""INSANITY IS : REPEATING THE SAME ACT , OVER AND OVER EXPECTING A DIFFERENT OUTCOME"" !!! 🙊🙉🙈👀👃👅👄👂👽💃👒👟👓👙👜🐸🐷🐙💉💊🚬🚽👾🔬🔭🍔🍕🍗🍻🍷🍧🍉🌽🎃🚔🗿🈚🈶♉
Andrija D. It deeply saddens me !!! All of these ""COSMIC METAPHYSICAL PERSPECTIVES"" that are acquired thru the '"TELEPATHIC AND TELEPORTIVE ABILITIES OF TRANSHUMAN WATER BABY HEADS "" !!!!! 👒👒👒👒👒
A person with a heart to teach, does not cut their students down when they don't understand. ruclips.net/video/whoylwf-i0A/видео.htmlm20s "You now know how an AC motor works?" You seem to be implying you just defined how an AC motor works, but all you did was give examples of the reference of parts. That seems to be in direct conflict with your ideas regarding observation and explanation. You can't talk down to people, then contradict yourself. By taking that attitude, you place yourself under a lot of judgement man. I really love listening to what you have to say, you're a free thinker, and I love that and have a lot of respect for it... but then you go and cut people down for being ignorant of the truth when all we've ever been surrounded by was false "doctrine" (at least in regards to the topic at hand). If you could ditch the "I love to tear ignorant people down" attitude, you could actually impact some people. But you're sure as hell not going to inform them by calling those people "idiots" or the myriad of other nasty things you call people in your videos. If you don't want to teach people then why are you writing your series? why are you posting these videos? If you DO want to teach or inform people, why are you speaking of your target audience as idiots? I'm really starting to think this is all about a pride attitude, and that's the same thing that keeps science locked into false understanding, the pride of men over their discovery's and knowledge. So, regardless of who is right, you're no better or worse than the "great scientific discoverers" who you so freely regard as idiots. But we get it. You figured it out, you couldn't possibly be wrong, and nobody will tell you otherwise. Plenty of other discoverers have held the same contemptuous attitude about their own false interpretations of their discoveries. I think you've got it right, and still, I am quickly getting to the point that I can't hear the good info that's here over the volume of your pride.
Chris Lesmerises I wish we were taught these thing in our schools. This was probably common knowledge to an 8 or 9 yrs olds back in the day when grand dad working at Temple Builder Construction Dedicated to exceed excellents..Est On day 09..
I know right? I love these theories, but the hypocrisy gets to be a bit much. I had a chuckle at the part where Feynman is referenced as an idiot, for an analogy he made about trying to explain magnetism, whereby he was saying "a description is not an explanation" in so many words, the exact words I've heard this guy repeat over and over as if he was growing weary of teach a pack of dogs not to piss on the carpet. I mean, I get it, it's frustrating to understand something that others do not. He is young though. Still plenty of room to grow.
You just need to understand a few basic rules of magnetism, 1.when a e current runs through something bc of a voltage potential a magnetic field is produced (use right hand a point thumb in direction of current and fingers will wrap in the direction of the field) 2. Moving a piece of e conductive material like metal through a magnetic field will induce a current through it. 3. if you induce a e voltage across a wire in the presence of a magnetic field you will induce a force on the wire(ie this is why two north poles rebel each other) 4 think of permanent magnets as metal that does not have to be charged with a battery to create its own magnetic field , it has all its tiny magnetic domains pointing in one direction which stacks creating a larger material that behaves like the smaller unit SO remember the mag field on the big magnet he has is donut shaped . if you were to look down at the magnet the field would be radially symmetric, the same on all sides from the center point. So he grabs his spinning metal disk, he places the spinning metal disk at the center of the top of the magnet, lets look at rules 1-3! So his magnet induces a current in his spinning disk! This means his spinning disk also will start to produce its own mag field! Pretty cool! Now how do theses fields interact, well since they are right on top of one another all the forces that are produced from the magnet that are radial are canceled out because they exist equally on all sides, any downward force is eliminated by him holding the spinner or by it resting on the magnet on the table, so were really looking at the horizontal forces or rotating forces. Now when he moves the metal spinning top to the edge of the magnet now half of the top is induced with a strong magnetic field and the other half a weaker field , basically its not balanced bc its not in the center of the donut feild, What happens now? well since we have different magnetic field strengths on either side being produced we start to see the third affect come into play! The side of the spinning top close to the center in induced more and the side of the top further induced less. (when top is on the side position)This imbalance of field interaction can only end with disruptive interference as the change in magnetic strength along the magnet decreases with counterclockwise rotation of the top and the magnetic field increases with clockwise rotation of the top. basically draw a dot on the spinning top and spin it on the side of the magnet, u will see the dot get closer and then further from the center of the magnet. this is why the top stops faster because of a greater magnetic difference across the top that is not radially symmetric
Totally agree. 20 minutes of blabbering about a simple concept. He deliberately delays explanations, and strokes his ego with repetitive buzz words (most of which he mispronounced) Self serving, condescending, antisocial, and generally annoying.
Have you ever tried the compass on the edge at 90 deg or 180 deg to the current position. Or with the axis parallel to the corner of the magnet? Is it the same result?
I really enjoy learning from you but, why oh why speak with a chip on your shoulder??…it doesn't help teaching but it does help turning you off...come on mate, you have knowledge that you seem to want to share it with us......... On a note of why it stops at the edge of the magnet, I wonder it it's down to the force being pushed out which in turns slows the wheel but the middle has no effect either in or out of the magnet??? Of course you can tell I'm no expert but interested in the effect..
If u act like ur enjoying urself ur fans would b happy 2.need enthusiasm. I dont need 2 take my sleeping pill tonight .if ur married ur wife hates u and is hiring a hitman as we speak.yaaaaawnn
It’s something like the flow of the field pulls upwards through the donut if you will what goes up must come down I guess and circles around in the vortex
It’s not you or us he’s commenting on it’s the force that is against us all the man if you will and how they keep us all down and the simple fact no one touches on these basic facts and why? Because Whestinghouse would be out of business which is wtf is wrong with this illusion we live in
Sorry to chime in right behind my last comment, but did anyone else notice that with all the comments below (pretty much all the "same" comments below) this gentleman did NOT offer any answer(s) to the questions...statements....critiques? Dang dude. You should really, REALLY read the comments and try to achieve the results that all the comments are urging you to move toward. And it's not 70% repetition, it's closer to 98%. You made my skin crawl.....because.....my lovely wife of 36yrs repeats herself like you do....and how I've been able to keep my composure and not smack the crap out of her for all these years is just.....a blessing from Heaven. PLEASE TAKE HEED, my friend. Now I'm off to spin my gyro-top-thingy.
Magnetic fields cannot capture chromosomes unless you bind them with a chemical/protein to iron particles. If you were right then an electro-magnetic field would devastate your body when you are within its influence. MRI is just such a field. Non-magnetic material is influenced by, but not attracted to a magnetic field. The way we separate stem-cells for harvest is a process of binding a protein to an Iron particle. This binding allows us to attract a particular cell out of the blood serum using the process of pulling the individual cell from that initial media. Then when we have captured enough cells we break the protein-cell bond and release the Iron particle w/protein from the cell and allow the unwanted material to be separated from the desired cells by magnetic attraction(getting the iron and protein out) and filtering of the serum and the cells to get the resultant stem cells for re-infusion into the patient. This is an alternative to a bone marrow transplant. It is used for high dose chemotherapy in cancer patients and others to re-infuse the body with its own cells or a donors.
rick Green do you do stem cell research? if so im curious I have multiple level disc degeneration disease and in 2004 said my only surgical repair would be completely fusing my spine from buttocks to skull with ond titanium bar . can they repair destroyed spinal discs with stem cell research? I am really interested in living without pain !!!! 2helpusbuild@gmail.com
I am so sorry that you have so much pain. It is not my field of expertise and I am only an engineer of electronics and mechanics by hard times. I don't know anyone in that field. I am not sure if stem cells released into the body can do much change to those areas unless you concentrate them and then it must be done I would imagine many many times over as the areas and the mass must be high density and maybe hormonal programmed to replace those cells as when they infuse. As I recall the immediate use for the cells is the replacement of the marrow as the chemo has destroyed the marrow in the bones during the process. A similar process was done with destroying tumors at one point and creating a magnetic field in the area of the tumor or for a time implantation of the magnet material in the area of the tumor but that was a failure or at least they dropped the research I really do not know what the failure was. They were using the magnet to attract a material bonded to the iron particles to kill the tumor and not replace the cells in that case. In the above case it seemed to me that the particles would have locked together and occluded the veinuals and would have done so to the veins over time or quickly and possibly an embolism could be caused by the prevention of flow in the area. I have not seen anything in your area of the body, but there has been research done with rats or mice in where they grow cartilage formed on the back of an animal and it grows looking like an ear. I don't know the density of the cartilage or if it in fact is cartilage but if it can be done that is the research I would be looking for to help you. Sorry hope you can find the solution. Be of good cheer the Lord of all is coming soon.
why do you repeat the same thing 20+ times, that's a sign of someone trying to convince someone without them thinking about it, i'm one of those people that has a more openness to understanding science, so in a sense we people tend to over analyse things, well son you over talk
Ok here is the deal: I am extremely dyslexic and 51 . Son ultimately I was accademicly robbed. Where this is relavent is along with the learning issue I was given gifts . For example as the gyro was moving in the center I could see / visualise the flow in the air; looking up and to the right. I think in three dimensions You are trying to teach and inform folks. You are a very smart dude , that is obvious You need to work on your method of teaching. The reason is this, the door to our brains are very heavy and being held up by a very fragile stick : Pride . If you want to be affective work on this . Another point I am going to make is , inmo there are things that are taught in science and higher math that are not correct. Mostly because the origin of these principles was opinion that an individual strived to prove. It's human nature to want to be correct . To validate a life's work. What this does when these are put into process , is create an inadvertent state of compensation. Metaphhoricly steering between the lines that you have been tought . What got me starting to contemplate this is questioning how someone with the gift I have am able to merely glimpse at a part that has been produced by an engineering department and say ; this is going prematurely fail . It's going to stretch x amount and be correct. I'm certainly not smarter then a department. One person can mess up a formula not a department. So something else was a factor and that is the method .
Can you show what it looks like through the magnetic film while you're spinning up & braking the flywheel? Also, is there a way to propel force out of the divergence?
Do you sir propose that we are bound to the surface of the Earth by magnetic forces? I myself do not believe in the Gravitic Theory,(I wonder if i can say that? ) I might sound crazy I know but I am starting to wonder if the Sun and the Moon do truly involved in some courses around the earth and are themselves wrapped in this relationship between the fields. perhaps they have a coherence? I also have to wonder if there is truly an Up and a Down? I know! say what you will! And no I don't claim to know, but my mental architecture is well built. One of the best sayings I've heard from a regular human is something like, "Neither descriptions or accurate observation are equal to "explanation". Thanks
donjohnswaggert i got a interesting theory for you. Density and buoyancy overcome gravity at all aspects. Now anything less dense wants to go up. For example helium. Some how a balloon overcomes all mighty gravity. When the earth cant escape the sun? Seems fishy. I personally believe that the sun and moon are super conductors held up by quantum locking. A super conductor quantum locked can hold 70000x its own weight. And can follow a fixed magnetic field. Look into it. Its very fasinating.
Both of you are too smart to be here. Please go save something with your thoughts. We need as many ppl like you two as we can get! And no, im not joking!
Zak Michalkow think of the light from the sun thru a convex lens converges at a spot where heat and a brightness is observed, and we can burn and start a fire to objects... the sun may be another convergent point of concentration from light or a high frequency (radiant watts) coming from another source... maybe the sun is not an object, but a nonphisical medium of sorts that could support the conveyance of some type of energy influence that could be eminating down thru the firmament from the heavenly realm above the waters on the firmament... just a few thoughts to ponder for ideas that make possible sence when you can see and understand some of the fe ingredients as real and true in the effects involved; and in turn to make such to be possibles to wonder about.
Keep wondering Lurch, Thing will be along soon to take you to Cousin It's planet Wolfe. You will go from the heat of Solaris where you will grow a lot of hair .But after truly reading and understanding your point of view, I find you are probably some troll like Christian influenced , brainwashed ideologically fear mongered idiom of thoughts irrelevant to how Solaris or ether is and how it works and wonder if you fathom the gravity theory of Newton's perceived noting. Quantum theories abound and some realized but still infancy takes many small steps until able to run. The other thoughts of gravity on this page are similar as usual.
Ken, I have to say: "you've done a brilliant job--presentations that are descriptively and cognitively accurate; finally physics is fun." -rph p.s. still don't fully understand the dielectric and magnetic field conjugate; kind of like the staring at those pieces of artwork with a hidden picture of a boat or something, hiding behind black/white static.
he simply is saying that Lenz force is not a factor in a properly designed generator or motor ,,and I made a few experiments of my own and I appreciate all the work he has done.because of his videos. I have done a few things with power generation that all the text books I read said is impossible..quit criticising his words and attitude and pay attention to what is being presented to u (think idiots) lol
I see. I need not look for a 1955 edition of "Astounding Science Fiction Magazine". It's all here right before my eyes - wild guesses, keen theories, physicist's mumble jumble, unseen realities, I'm still waiting for the Great Ghoul to strike us with enlightenment.
I'm going to be honest, first time i watched (two years ago) everything I understood was a dude playing with a gyro, but after getting into magnetism, fusion, electronics... my thoughts were this guy knows the universe, and has a simple explanation of it.
He has a theory and uses big words to try hide the cracks '
Or holds the gyroscope differently!!!
If he really knew the truth as he boldly states.. To earn income would he be crafting leather bags or building efficient generators !!!
Come on bro
Think about it...!
Yeah he's informative
But his theories are only theories
Without something working and functional,!
@@richardlilley6274 Some are interested in greater things than "income", and given how most athletes/celebrities make way more than top professions in fields that actually matter, clearly it indicates nothing of value, as long as the person has a steady life without suffering in poverty.
@@WOWWOW-hk1tb yes I get your point
Yet that doesn't explain why a man who says he can change the whole world with his physics and knowledge
Is making purses and bags out of murdered animals...
Excuses are what man makes best...!
Sometimes there are no excuses friend yet we make them because we don't like the truth...
@@WOWWOW-hk1tb 2 homes a farm flash car grands worth of equipment.. is hardly poverty stricken friend
He's likable and an interesting character and knows some stuff.
He's also arrogant and controlling
Good and bad in everyone friend
We're hypocrits if we ignore one person's faults over another's who we condemn
Simply because one has a smile we like and is jovial..
@@richardlilley6274 hater
The problem is not knowledge, the problem is finding someone who can explain that knowledge. Thank you sir, you are brilliant.
He replaces intuitive explanations with hundreds of undefined, unexplained terms he expects everyone to know. What is trans euclidean geometry supposed to be? The only explanations of it that I could find have come from his channel. The inverse of a 3D shape? What’s that supposed to mathematically / spatially mean?
I feel like this is an endless loop video that never reaches the end. lol
Kevin , it must be that you are in the center of the vortex...
You have to move to the edge of the vortex for an instant stop... and a donut :)
Must be the magnet flux
it's about pressure changes
When he doesn't repeat himself people complain about it being too complicated. You can't win.
+Theoria Apophasis Cool this may explain something i have observed at work. As an engineer we use magnetic squares to hold 2 pieces of metal together before tacking them in place. i noticed that sometimes the magnetic field doesn't do anything to the weld but especially with my big magnet the molten metal blows back in my face before it can cool and bind the 2 pieces. So today after watching this video i did an experiment. I got my big magnet which can hold about 1kg or more, laid it on its side like yours, placed a thin piece of flat steel on top and proceeded to weld across it and as i expected in the center of the magnet the weld pool settled normally and the closer i welded to the centrifugal divergence point at the edge of the magnet the more the weld was repelled and sprayed out on to the floor
Interesting
For those of you not wanting to watch him repeat himself for 20 minutes and use big words to try to explain a rather simple concept. Magnets have a toroidal field surrounding them. These fields have a swirling vortex like movement in the middle of them (which is why the top will keep spinning in the center), but on the outside edges (while still at the same strength as the vortex part) it's not a vortex but a wide outward sweeping motion. This causes the top to stop spinning because the field movement or 'flow' if you will, is different there... yeah that's it. That's all he's trying to say with all this LOL
lmao you should have just made the video instead of this guy. Thanks!
Only a lot more in depth and in a manner which even an idiot could understand. Only if they first accept that Einstein was a moron aside from a high IQ. “Special relativity” 🤦♂️ lol. Not rly how theory’s are created, but ok.
Why not just explain the right hand rule because the magnetic field is perpendicular to the electric field and a force on a conductor in a magnetic field generates an electric field the resulting force will either be in clockwise or ccw I.e. speeding it up or slowing it down based on the direction of the magnetic fields
@@kylewesbrook4916 there is no difference between magnetic and electric. A better description would be magnetic force, not electromotive force.
He is obviously trying to make you familiar with the reasons as to why it happens. He is EXPLAINING how magnets work. Because we aren't told that in school. And it has huge implications. HUGE.
If you are a truth seeker I suggest you actually listen to EVERYTHING he is trying to say and visualize it. Watch his other videos too until you understand magnetism and you will understand just HOW much we fucked up in science.
had a few drinks not sure what these words mean but really like the sound of them ..plus love the colorful gloves you wear for the experiment ..
OMG.....BRILLIANT😅😂😅🤣😅
😂😂😂🇺🇸
is it bad if i say i wish i had said that first?....LOL
turn the freaking top sideways on the top center of the magnet
I chanced on watching one of his video some 3 years ago. He is extremely ingenious man. He was talking about on physics topic; very fascinating; something about quantum or relativity or so. But his knowledge was in depth. I was very impressed and had to drop my generalization about ppl having tattoos are bikers only. I was wrong. This man is something and he must be teaching in MIT or Berkley, or Rice Univ. Good man. I like him.
when i was looking at that Sacred Geometry stuff it made me feel like it was a drawing of the board of those very young children puzzle boards that have outlines for where the pieces go. It was showing that but for a field in the cosmos somewhere. But this video you made took me past that crude idea and up to the understanding of fields and their nature and what fits in it. THANK YOU VERY MUCH! I truly treasure this understanding and for showing it to me.
EXCELLENT. Torroidal Basics 101--for dummies. Personally, I loved it. Gives me a graphic understanding, I never learned in College Physics. The geometery is beyond most(by far) but I found this clarifying. SUBSCRIBED.
Amazing!!! Thank you so much!!!!!!
I always says that rainbows are toruses. It never occurred to me that it is because of the Earth's magnetism.
Please show that gyroscope doesn't slow down over center of magnet when angled perpedincular to magnet surface (wheel rotating around horizontal axis ) . If it slows down the same like on the edge than I have explanation for it
We´re in a world that whorships information rather than wisdom... this is just pure fresh air for our over (stupid) complicated minds. Thank you Ken for your direct, simple and neutral seek for answers
Fantastic, Thank you... I shared this on my Face Book Page...
Great video!
Thank you
Have you ever dropped a neodymium magnet through a copper tube. It is a lot better effect but the same force you are experiencing.
Incredible stuff man. I once witnessed a person create a vortex of human energy with his Nunchaku. The wind and sound was shocking to see and hear.
Thanks for sharing friend 💯👊🏼👊🏼
I feel privileged to hear this guy.
Rick the Swift -You really need to get out more.
@@danielmccarville225 -Very true as well :D
I was hooked before I started the video. I've been interested in magnetism all of my life. I used to take apart my toys just for the electric motors and any other parts I can use. I didn't want toys , I wanted chemistry , electronic and magnets. Awesome video and presentation.
All through school I was told I will be taught how magnets work next year. I was very disappointed to go to university to find out no one knows anything and I quit. It didn't help either that the idiots that I thought would be left behind at high school were in science class at uni. I appreciate your videos.
The real question is why are we learning that gravity is distortion of time celebrating Einstein and he s theory of “stupidity” disregarding Tesla and magnetism ?
@@ognjenkalaba3522 well actually a physics major learns about magnetism sooner than Einstein.
I can understand your enthusiasm over this film. I loved it and have passed it on. Good work.
Thank You very much!! Nice work!!
Theoria: I'm beginning to see where you are going with this concept. Do you think it is possible that there is a momentum transfer between the field and the brass? The edge of the magnet "taking" momentum while the centripetal divergent part of the field imparts, or retains it? Do you think it would be possible to transfer momentum from one flywheel to another using the hybperboloid geometry?
Noting the brass tube and magnet experiment, I'd imagine that brass flywheel is, whilst it is in motion and therefore taking part in a complete dielectric circuit, if I am grasping the principles correctly that is. Alike the tube the motion, relative to available dielectric current where one is highly conductive, ie copper/brass, creates interaction, resulting in its own 'magnetic field', I'd estimate they'd be as oppositional poles.
The result being that, relative to the centre it assists the spin, the 'drive', somewhat as although they turn against one another, that turn is pushing with the whirling toroidal field. At the outer edge the fields act as though two clockwork cogwheels turning against each other.
That said I may not grasp it well.
Yes this is a dielectric interaction IE a forceful pole shift simply put. It has to occur between an already existing changing EM field and a dielectric and it is always opposition and braking. I used to build electric motors and we put the motors on massive aluminum plates that rotated and when dragging the magnets across the dielectric aluminum, it would make the aluminum wheel spin but it felt like I was dragging the magnets through water.
Theoria, I’d love to see a video on phase conjugate dielectrics! I follow Dan winter on his videos as well. You two put together a perfect presentation for the unification of all things. Thank you for everything you do! I cannot believe the amazing things I have learned from you!
@@brianburch1381 hey, just wanted to say thank you for the Dan Winter reference. He has exactly the information I have been searching for!!
@@kennethkretschmer1027 I’m so happy to hear that! I honestly have stopped searching for new sources -guiltily- while following these two geniuses. They seem to answer pretty much all of my questions! I’m amazed though and I’m very happy you have found what you’re looking for!
@@brianburch1381 after getting into some of the deeper stuff it’s a lot tbh, but the geometry and bliss explanations seem spot on. Did some breathing already and had some progress already.
Take a look at theory of magnetic braking, it's a really simple concept and theme park rides make use of this very principle
Thanks so much for explaining these invisible forces.
I wonder if you measure upper and bottom part of the stick in the center of the copper wheel, would there be any voltage when it breaks the momentum ?
I still think it's Eddie current....if you have gyroscope continuously/endlessly in spin and perhaps even faster speed, the gyro disc will have heat build up (not. the spindle, the disc)
Love your work ❤️ thank you 🙏 for your time, very grateful
Thank you for this!!
Just to add to my last comment, you could've probably trimmed this video down by 75%.
milkball - maybe even 95%
What material is the shaft of the gyroscope made of? Neither copper or aluminium are ferrous, how is the magnet able to effect the scope? I know questions with questions, but i never went to school.
Look up the magnet down copper tube experiment.
This will give you an example of a non-ferrous material interacting with a magnetic field: ruclips.net/video/QwUq8xM_8bY/видео.html
I challenge any one of you to make a video explaining everything important that he explained in the amount of time you stated.
Toroidal force divergence? Sounds like what I get while sitting on the can in the morning.
Yeah, I get that.
Hilarious and original
Toroidally divergent "flux lines of force". He is correct.
Michael Kirst . Gastrointestinal turbulence...
Micheal
Thanks for the laugh!!:)
The last thing I thought I'd hear in your video is a hair dryer. You are full of surprises sir.
Thank you for taking your time to explain.
Knock, knock. "Who is it"? "Its us, the cows. We're home".
Lmao!
what do you think searl is about then really?
Excellent breakdown and material thank you for posting
Awesome info, you are a genius!
Lol I’ve never seen someone take so long to say so little. I like your videos, I like to learn from you, but I have to be honest when I say you can do so much better.
If you wish to take my advice, and turn what you might see as coal into gold, do the following;
>trim the fat of your videos. You could of said what needed to be said in 10 minutes, if not 3.
>stop being condescending to your audience. We’re not as stupid as you think. If we can understand you and are here learning from you we deserve the same respect you do.
>saying “big words” or jargon makes you sound smart but leave those not in the know in the dust, and because we are watching YOU to learn we are, for the most part, not in the know.
I wish you luck on your journey!
Well well what do we have here? Looks like we have a pot that doesnt realize its black as well. Lol
@@ibecoolman how so? I dont see have my comment could apply to myself. I dont make videos that I can trim fat on, nor do I have an audience to be condecending too. Even my comment was done out of kindness. Are you familiar with the pot calling the kettle black and what its supposed to mean? 👀
@@exister4959 lol. I dont think that I have ever seen someone take so long to say so little. I like your comments. I like to learn from you, but I have to be honest when i say that you can do such a better job now in this present time than you could do before to write comments that have less words than your comments in the past, and still get the same point to go from you to the person reading your comment. I'm also unaware that I am writing a novel to express a sentence worth of material to help you understand that pots and kettles are both black.
@@ibecoolman i wrote 5 sentences, 3 of wish were done in bullet point format all expressing 3 unique ideas. Im sorry you're upset but I won't say sorry that you're wrong. Maybe reading more than one sentence gives you a headache but slowly you should work yourself to two than maybe you can even read 5!!!!!
I've watched this channel a lot I left the comment in earnest because I want this man to succeed. He has the habit of going in circles and also condescending his audience in every video and not doing so would be a huge boon to him. Have a happy new year!!!
@@exister4959 I really don't care. I'm trying to get a rise out of you and you're letting me. Dont let people do that to you.
The field at the side of the magnet is very high. The flux density is actually higher due to the flux attempting to go from north to south in as tight a return path as it can. The flux cannot touch or come together as it is always in repulsion to the next line of flux. Like poles repel and the lines do the same. The reason you are experiencing the loss of motion is called eddy current loss. When in the center of the magnet the gyro in a singular magnetic field in every direction it will be the same because you are in the center of the disc so it only sees the singular pole and the uniform density from center toward the edge is present. So the material sees no difference in flux density during rotation and no change in alignment of the dipole. Like north or south and it should be even more or less across the full surface of the material and seeing the same field density and no relaxing of the internal dipole as it is definitely one pole throughout its surface at any one point from center to edge. Now I don't know why the gyro should not eventually stop just due to entropy, I am assuming it does but I have never done this experiment using a gyro.
However that is not the case with the flux at the edge of the magnet. The density of the magnetic field is different it is higher closer to the edge and the field is lower as you get away from the edge . So what is happening is that the spinning material is seeing more flux as it rotates closer to the edge and less flux is seen an inch or more from the edge. So flux is influencing the non magnetic material no longer with the same flux density uni-formally across the surface. As the spinning material is changing from high flux density to lower flux density at the max distance. The dipole is experiencing change and when it does it creates a loss or work is happening within the material, it's internal dipole which relaxes during rotation from the high to a low density field when farthest from the edge. As the gyro material internal dipole is forced into alignment with the increasing flux density it creates a drag as the internal dipole goes from non-alignment and higher flux density while aligning with the flux's north south field.
Where the flux is lower furthest from the magnet and not as compacted as at the edge of the disc. The flux density is less as you get further away from the edge of the magnet. Therefore the gyro's dipole relaxes during rotation due to there being less flux but when it enters the higher density of flux closer to the edge of the disc the flux forces the gyro dipole to realign with the magnets flux. The power to force realignment creates a loss in its rotation as it resists alignment by pushing back against the incoming increase of flux which is being more compacted into the gyros material as it gets to the apex of density which continues to push back against the alignment. Overcoming the materials naturally relaxed dipole to align with the flux uses energy. It pushes against the field from the magnet and you see the rotational loss due to that pushing back or its resisting alignment. Look up Eddy currents. We used this property of the magnetic field for brakes on the Accelerator ride at Knott's Berry Farm in California. You can see a copper bar come up and down at the end of the ride while waiting in line. The braking is swift and is not to hard on the people. It also is used on various other projects for slowing, creating drag on other products like fishing spinners.
WRONG, any gaussmeter shows the field is the SAME at the center as at the edge
Sorry I am not wrong on this fact. You have a Gauss meter? if so is the probe transverse or axial?Are you looking at the surface or at a distance? Yes,it is agreed that the field is more or less the same across the surface but not at at a distance. To give you a set up the test from the side of magnet. it will depend upon the type of probe you have. Tell me the type. I can send you a process for testing your theory and the proof of what I am saying can be confirmed.
imgur.com/a/gJ4Gw
capt. you get the prize. this is correct and the difference in the flux density is why the gyro sees more flux and resistance is as you depicted in your drawing. Good job. Thank you very much.
rick Green I even left a long and a little emotional detailed explainition on the other video before i realized the author is a person who will just plug his ears and refuse to listen.
ruclips.net/video/JauYH0omKIA/видео.html
God I love you in a genuine humanitarian way.
I need to go and like n comment n share on everyone one of your videos dude. It’s the only way I can help for the moment.
You know what they say about people who have to have the biggest magnet
They have bigger attractive, repulsive, bi polar things in their life?
They got big cars??
Ego Maximus. Haha
Big feet
I had a really BIG magnet once, my wife now has it!!!
have someone place that blue gauss visualizer over the magnet and gyroscope during the whole experiment....and watch the difference....
LOOK AT MY COMMENT PLEASE IMPORTANT
Keep upping vibration to flow. Respect and gratitude. You are unlimited possibilities
nice explained, thank you realy much
You have ruined my ability to be entertained by the discovery channel!
This guy is still pretty entertaining, especially if you do know something about science.
***** first time I hear about that "rule book". Where can I get it?
Joking aside, I teach my students to think, to reason, to understand. You, my friend, either had lazy teachers, or completely misunderstood them.
By the way, science is exciting. It is just as you described it. I do hope you will get a chance to experience it the right way.
One thing about Tesla... he would laugh in the face of the clown with the gyroscope.
destiny walker he is married to a rocket ship you know..
u are better off.
destiny walker lol
when i set my frying pan on the center of my stove burner it will fry an egg ALL day long, when i set the pan on the side of the burner i get immediate cessation of egg frying... i like donuts
cr0wsb0nes lol hahahaha
But if you set that pan beside the burner on Neptune you'll get covered up with funky tattoos. Try it...
Nice
There is more potential in magnetism than there is in a doughnut.
wouldn't that depend on the type of doughnut?
Amazing! Thank you! 😃👍
Amazing thank you for sharing! People are Gelous.
I want that magnet
In Soviet Russia magnet wants YOU!!!
Great video! Small correction. The term for the magnetoreceptor, located in the retina, is cryptochrome not chromotomes, When disturbed a message is sent to the pineal gland via the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Subsequently melatonin production is inhibited. Your other video explained why blue light makes it react, due to the capacitance found in blue light. Could microwave frequencies also create capacitance in the human eye?
Total EMF Solutions so would enf fields inhibit melatonin production ? Ie from wifi and cell towers..
Where can I read more of this? I could explain scientifically the fascination induced by eye gazing in ancient hypnosis schools with effects on pineal gland and induced altered states of consciousness.
Very Good! Decriptions are not Explanations You are obviously Brilliant!
This observation/conclusion is why I listen to you.
You obviously know what your talking about!
As a Physicist researcher - I discovered this principle as the main reason there are still unexplained issues in our world.
I phrase it as: Descriptions are not Definitions!
I sit at your feet - struggling to comprehend!
I love your videos man, seriously kudos
If I stuck the magnet on one side of my head, and a nail on the other, would it suck the nail through my head? For future prospects..
BurningTirez call me when this happens... I need the knowlegde
Good point. If people would wear magnets like that behind their heads, it would be easier for the cops to shoot people in the head, cant miss. Peace.
Yes
@@blatendcrude7570 bullets are made of lead, therfore nonmagnetic. but funny as hell. If the magnet is strong enough though, they could not shoot back due to the pull of the magnetic field effecting the eyes. "Look me in my good eye!" lol.
When you use the magnetic viewing film, at the begining, to show the dielectric inertial plane of the monster magnet. The dielectric inertial plane us much wider then the smaller magnets. So, the dielectric inertial plane of the Earth is miles wide?
Isnt that why the earth is where it's at in our solar system? Other planes as well?
@@BlahBlahBlahjoo our flat earth are you talking about,, with the dome over it with pretty lights in it? dood you know as much about the solar system as you do about brain surgey.
You spent so much time buttering me up that I am now sliding out of here.
....so insightful
They knew. Torus-Hyperboloid
Ancient hyperborea
Don't be so angry photog.
Stop repeating yourself and get to the point.
Please. Thanks for the vids though. For sure.
I need the repetition. How TF did this guy figure it out!
thats how you know they don't know what they are talking about in these conspiracy vids.... 95% of the time they don't show anything new or special. just a mind f*ck.
thank you keep up the videos !
Thank you brother you helped me grow and learn, much graduate love and light be blessed!!!!
Just freaking get to the point dude!!!
Jeez!
Just draw some shit on a paper or something.and make us understand.I got nothing.
Dude!! Watch the whole series "The Secrets of Magnetism"
@@ginrudy7613 I have, and got bored with him repeatedly patting himself on the back for thinking he is smarter than Einstein.
Frank North I know dude, could you imagine this guy having a real person to talk to? and even worse, being that person..... ughhhh...
it's been said that a true teacher can explain things in ways that everyone can understand. and that will keep everyone interested.
this guy uses very limited nomenclature...
kinetic blues He’s at best a midwit who is trying to sound like he is on a different level than everyone else.
The fact that he’s accomplished absolutely nothing should by now have clued him in that he’s not nearly as intelligent as he would like us to believe.
But of course that reality is out of his reach since he’s wrapped himself up in this delusional false view of himself.
And trust me I am being generous when I call him a midwit.
pretty much useless repetition. it's a long video. practice it once or twice should be sufficient enough with his explanation, but he did it repeatedly which is boring for some people xD well, some of them may like that, but I prefer doing it to the point. 😁
I believe referring to Richard Feynman as an idiot does a disservice to your plight of enlightenment.
I just ask 1,286 people to tell me anything more idiotic than calling Feynman stupid. One answer.... arguing with a wife. This dude needs to be deplatformed.
Feynman was a mathem
You can actually see the dreamcatcher pattern "etching" into the chrome surface. Really cool. U r lighting up that fire in me for experimentation again, for that i thank you. Few people can really do that. You appear to have an exceptionally indepth understanding of a few different interrelated sciences, perhaps a science as yet unnamed (like the relatively new science of archaioastronomy). I hope you find something as yet unknown.
Good to revisit vital information.
I believe Ken is correct with his theory. My advice to anyone trying to understand this model for magnetism is to simply watch the chain of videos , one after another. It helps to take notes of the basic key terms he uses. Eventually the concept begins to make sense.
because you are thinking on his frequency. your belief changes your reality.
@@artvandelay3650 that's casting quite a large net buddy otherwise you are corrupt yourself though the reduction machine that is our brain probably won't give anyone true reality anytime soon so take my comment with a grain of salt lol
@Theoria Apophasis I'd love to know your thoughts on the legitimacy of NASA and other space agencies.
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION AT 4"47 HIS FINGER IS WHAT APPLIES THE MEENS OF IT STOPPING ,AS YOU SEE THE FINGER DEPRESSES JUST AFTER IT STOPS ,HE IS LIEING ,WOW!!!!
@@stephanedemers8590 im sry but ur an idiot
@@stephanedemers8590 GO TO AN OPTICIAN 🙄😎
@@stephanedemers8590 yeah you saw it too...
Disingenuous slight of hand giving it a little tweek...
Hence I stopped watching
Shouldn't have to have eyes up our ass when watching an experiment
Incredible!
Thank you.
Dude, someone has scribbled all over your hands
With every term he uses, his head gets twice as big. You're informed, we get it, but you seem to not retain anything pertaining to becoming humble.
He doesn't have to make these video's for our benefit and you certainly don't need to be offended by not knowing half as much as he seems to.
Your comment shows that you are intimidated by his intelligence. I'm not intimidated. He's using the nomenclature used for this field. You should thank him for doing so. I'd you tried tipp research online without the proper terms yout won't get desired result.
The dude is calling feinman an idiot. That should put some things into perspective for you... Unmanifest LOL, if you have a you st, why haven't you broken the mould yet? Oh yeah, because your theories do not actually predict observable results. Give one instance where this mumbo jumbo takes you further than Fineman in understanding particle fields And how that knowledge would you to add something qualitative to quantum mechanical Theory which I'm assuming you don't ascribe to
Brainy Smurf loves to hear himself talk. Even sounds like brainy smurf
Hence, proving my point that you can be the smartest guy in the world, and still be dumb as a box of rocks! Wisdom/intelligence any day, all day, week, months, and years to come! And his display of meism is evidence of that fact! Peaceout!
My question is how long will the precision compass keep spinning
Since you asked for my thoughts: There is no magnetic field. All these effects are the result of the spatial shaping created by the movement of the electric field. Your continued reference to imaginary fields is a sorry compromise to past imaginary constructs because of the reactions of objects to the distortions in the space around the moving electric field potential (EFP) that is trapped by the structure of the magnet.
Similar to your analogy that a vagina is a hole, the center/point of the pleasure and function of that organ isn't the space it can create. Your geometric lines and shapes that you project as a real magnetic field or lines of force are nothing more than stuff filling holes created by the collective aligned moving E-field.
The basic E-Field (EF) structure of a spinning disc is simply a stable structure of the balancing EF forces that include the concentration and collapse of the EF Potential as it repels and circles and concentrates. In contrast it distorts space, which varies surrounding the spinning disc of EFP, which is variable across the radius of the disc. The imbalance is most concentrated at the center of the disc, where the force of the repelling EF is most intensely inwardly directed, and again has an imbalance at the edge of the magnet where the density and motivating forces are completely outwardly directed.
Your spinning gyroscope is creating a moving EFP that interacts more sensitively to the collective spinning EFP of the magnet. The braking effect is simply the imbalances of the misalignment resolving according to the physically less restrictive object.
You will find that a smaller disc magnet will not sit anywhere on the larger disc magnet, it will align itself edge to edge on the top surface or flip and align at the domain wall. This is because the real interaction isn't any distortion of space, but rather the moving EFP forces.
Also steel balls will be drawn to the least neutralized moving EFP on the disc, the edge.
And one last point: spin your gyro backwards, or flip it and now it's contrary to the spinning EFP, and it will stop at the center too. Even faster than at your angle at the edge.
The holes or distortions created by the MEFP only affect the compactness of particles in motion as they form solid structures as in liquid to solid transitions or developing living structures, or formation of planets. Which emphasizes that the Earth's EF has been changing over it's lifetime as the Earth is expanding without adding more matter and life forms transitioning from massive giants and dinosaurs to the smaller beasts and people of today.
Thanks for asking... When I have the patience to overlook your anger, I find your work quite illuminating and inspirational. You might check out distinti's work on RUclips and .com He has some matrix vector analysis that may just quantify what you're intuitively identifying as both time and spatial differential influences of E-fields.
Cheers, B
What approach is this from, electrical universe theory?
cloud0123 My current thoughts, above are my own. They bring together the quantitative work of Distinti on the actual field behavior, EP Dollard on that part of E fields that actually repels, the dielectric field (however, this is not his interpretation), Ken Wheeler et.al. Re. Work on how the polar fields of magnets, which also correlate to the strength of the electric field of moving charges (there is an imbalance in polar charge fields because the source fields are all aligned and balance axially, aligned but not balanced radially and the field is directional in nature). Because the magnetic particles are locked in place before they are aligned, they can't move to balance all the forces. The South Pole is simply more uniform than the North Pole, this compacts it compared to the North.
The bit on the expanding earth is simply an application of these basic observed behaviors which are demonstrated in the Ebner Effect et.al. (Numerous patents) who show intense fields or strong magnetic fields change the mass and atomic packing density and therefor how DNA expresses itself, even in animals. Modern animals develop into extinct species when eggs and embryos are put in high electric field or South Pole pseudo fields.
The EU theory may embrace this, certainly the theory that e fields influence all things in the Universe is consistent. And the movement of Earth into its present orbit requires a change in our localized electric field from when we were orbiting with Saturn, Venus, and Mars around the Sun on a much smaller planet.
It is one Universe and one theory of one field with two directional properties makes all this possible. Even the Aether may simply be the combination of all the local fields into a Universal field. So far I haven't seen it do anything beyond a background field couldn't do.
A great scientist isn't afraid to be wrong and happily throws away an entire theory when it fails. He's also constantly looking to disprove his current passion by poking at it ever more deeply. This is a proper application of sociopathic behavior. Recognize society need consistency and progress, that's where a great engineer applies the shattering truths of science into positive steps of growth. His biggest impediment is the capitalist, who will gladly sacrifice all hope of growth for more of what is today. Safety in reserves is all he knows because science failed to present anything from the universal field soon enough. And engineers haven't developed a safe transition, yet.
Merry Christmas, enjoy the transition to a new growth period. Will this be the one?
BMan18 he half correct, there more than what you think inside of it. but sci wrong on some part as My observations and show me otherwise.
I'm curious as to exactly what sort of "holes" your explanation fills that his does not?
It almost appears to me as though you are simply using two different conventions to explain the same thing. Granted I have not spent the necessary time with your material to fully understand where it diverges; I haven't yet been presented with a question which would require me to restructure my understanding beyond what this man is explaining.
Whereas my "education" is public school left me with many questions, these explanations make much more sense. (Theoria's)
What sort of question or observation could his convention NOT explain, is what I am asking? What is the requirement which is not met? You could say "Oh well magnetic fields don't actually exist" and then go on to create a bunch of new conventions which essentially add up to "a magnetic field," appearing only to diverge in that you call it and all its components by some other name; but why?
Jesus you can talk repeating yourself over and over and over and over.Pleas come to s point.
Crackpot or not he has valid cosmological theory.
Frank Lowe said
Frank Lowe. Remember Fred Flintstone ; when he was driving to work and everything he passed ; the same scenery would keep going by in the background !!!!! Einstein said ""INSANITY IS : REPEATING THE SAME ACT , OVER AND OVER EXPECTING A DIFFERENT OUTCOME"" !!! 🙊🙉🙈👀👃👅👄👂👽💃👒👟👓👙👜🐸🐷🐙💉💊🚬🚽👾🔬🔭🍔🍕🍗🍻🍷🍧🍉🌽🎃🚔🗿🈚🈶♉
Jesus repeated himself because people were too hard hearted to accept what He was saying.
Andrija D. It deeply saddens me !!! All of these ""COSMIC METAPHYSICAL PERSPECTIVES"" that are acquired thru the '"TELEPATHIC AND TELEPORTIVE ABILITIES OF TRANSHUMAN WATER BABY HEADS "" !!!!! 👒👒👒👒👒
Thank You
Man this was a good vid thanks for the info!!!
A person with a heart to teach, does not cut their students down when they don't understand. ruclips.net/video/whoylwf-i0A/видео.htmlm20s "You now know how an AC motor works?" You seem to be implying you just defined how an AC motor works, but all you did was give examples of the reference of parts. That seems to be in direct conflict with your ideas regarding observation and explanation. You can't talk down to people, then contradict yourself. By taking that attitude, you place yourself under a lot of judgement man. I really love listening to what you have to say, you're a free thinker, and I love that and have a lot of respect for it... but then you go and cut people down for being ignorant of the truth when all we've ever been surrounded by was false "doctrine" (at least in regards to the topic at hand). If you could ditch the "I love to tear ignorant people down" attitude, you could actually impact some people. But you're sure as hell not going to inform them by calling those people "idiots" or the myriad of other nasty things you call people in your videos. If you don't want to teach people then why are you writing your series? why are you posting these videos? If you DO want to teach or inform people, why are you speaking of your target audience as idiots? I'm really starting to think this is all about a pride attitude, and that's the same thing that keeps science locked into false understanding, the pride of men over their discovery's and knowledge. So, regardless of who is right, you're no better or worse than the "great scientific discoverers" who you so freely regard as idiots. But we get it. You figured it out, you couldn't possibly be wrong, and nobody will tell you otherwise. Plenty of other discoverers have held the same contemptuous attitude about their own false interpretations of their discoveries. I think you've got it right, and still, I am quickly getting to the point that I can't hear the good info that's here over the volume of your pride.
Chris Lesmerises
I wish we were taught these thing in our schools. This was probably common knowledge to an 8 or 9 yrs olds back in the day when grand dad working at Temple Builder Construction Dedicated to exceed excellents..Est On day 09..
I know right? I love these theories, but the hypocrisy gets to be a bit much. I had a chuckle at the part where Feynman is referenced as an idiot, for an analogy he made about trying to explain magnetism, whereby he was saying "a description is not an explanation" in so many words, the exact words I've heard this guy repeat over and over as if he was growing weary of teach a pack of dogs not to piss on the carpet. I mean, I get it, it's frustrating to understand something that others do not. He is young though. Still plenty of room to grow.
"i'm rubber and you're glue...." :D
big ass dude ::squints::
You just need to understand a few basic rules of magnetism,
1.when a e current runs through something bc of a voltage potential a magnetic field is produced (use right hand a point thumb in direction of current and fingers will wrap in the direction of the field)
2. Moving a piece of e conductive material like metal through a magnetic field will induce a current through it.
3. if you induce a e voltage across a wire in the presence of a magnetic field you will induce a force on the wire(ie this is why two north poles rebel each other)
4 think of permanent magnets as metal that does not have to be charged with a battery to create its own magnetic field , it has all its tiny magnetic domains pointing in one direction which stacks creating a larger material that behaves like the smaller unit
SO remember the mag field on the big magnet he has is donut shaped . if you were to look down at the magnet the field would be radially symmetric, the same on all sides from the center point.
So he grabs his spinning metal disk, he places the spinning metal disk at the center of the top of the magnet, lets look at rules 1-3! So his magnet induces a current in his spinning disk! This means his spinning disk also will start to produce its own mag field! Pretty cool! Now how do theses fields interact, well since they are right on top of one another all the forces that are produced from the magnet that are radial are canceled out because they exist equally on all sides, any downward force is eliminated by him holding the spinner or by it resting on the magnet on the table, so were really looking at the horizontal forces or rotating forces. Now when he moves the metal spinning top to the edge of the magnet now half of the top is induced with a strong magnetic field and the other half a weaker field , basically its not balanced bc its not in the center of the donut feild, What happens now? well since we have different magnetic field strengths on either side being produced we start to see the third affect come into play! The side of the spinning top close to the center in induced more and the side of the top further induced less. (when top is on the side position)This imbalance of field interaction can only end with disruptive interference as the change in magnetic strength along the magnet decreases with counterclockwise rotation of the top and the magnetic field increases with clockwise rotation of the top. basically draw a dot on the spinning top and spin it on the side of the magnet, u will see the dot get closer and then further from the center of the magnet. this is why the top stops faster because of a greater magnetic difference across the top that is not radially symmetric
Neat topic, video didn't need to be 20 minutes long and could do with out the condescending attitude.
I can't listen to the whining, nasally, repeating, condescending voice for more than 2 min. Bye!
Totally agree. 20 minutes of blabbering about a simple concept. He deliberately delays explanations, and strokes his ego with repetitive buzz words (most of which he mispronounced) Self serving, condescending, antisocial, and generally annoying.
Pussy lol no one will conform to what you want in life let the dude be himself
@@s00p3rman probably partly because this video is for idiots who need it repeated lol
...lol...I just wrote almost the same thing...Mine was a little bit longer! I tried keeping it positive!
Have you ever tried the compass on the edge at 90 deg or 180 deg to the current position. Or with the axis parallel to the corner of the magnet? Is it the same result?
You sir are VERY INTERESTING!
I really enjoy learning from you but, why oh why speak with a chip on your shoulder??…it doesn't help teaching but it does help turning you off...come on mate, you have knowledge that you seem to want to share it with us.........
On a note of why it stops at the edge of the magnet, I wonder it it's down to the force being pushed out which in turns slows the wheel but the middle has no effect either in or out of the magnet??? Of course you can tell I'm no expert but interested in the effect..
If u act like ur enjoying urself ur fans would b happy 2.need enthusiasm. I dont need 2 take my sleeping pill tonight .if ur married ur wife hates u and is hiring a hitman as we speak.yaaaaawnn
It’s something like the flow of the field pulls upwards through the donut if you will what goes up must come down I guess and circles around in the vortex
It’s not you or us he’s commenting on it’s the force that is against us all the man if you will and how they keep us all down and the simple fact no one touches on these basic facts and why? Because Whestinghouse would be out of business which is wtf is wrong with this illusion we live in
If he didn't love to hear himself talk so much I'd stick around!
Got it. Thanks.
Sorry to chime in right behind my last comment, but did anyone else notice that with all the comments below (pretty much all the "same" comments below) this gentleman did NOT offer any answer(s) to the questions...statements....critiques? Dang dude. You should really, REALLY read the comments and try to achieve the results that all the comments are urging you to move toward. And it's not 70% repetition, it's closer to 98%. You made my skin crawl.....because.....my lovely wife of 36yrs repeats herself like you do....and how I've been able to keep my composure and not smack the crap out of her for all these years is just.....a blessing from Heaven. PLEASE TAKE HEED, my friend. Now I'm off to spin my gyro-top-thingy.
that magnet is so powerful it captures chromosomes
Magnetic fields cannot capture chromosomes unless you bind them with a chemical/protein to iron particles.
If you were right then an electro-magnetic field would devastate your body when you are within its influence. MRI is just such a field. Non-magnetic material is influenced by, but not attracted to a magnetic field.
The way we separate stem-cells for harvest is a process of binding a protein to an Iron particle. This binding allows us to attract a particular cell out of the blood serum using the process of pulling the individual cell from that initial media. Then when we have captured enough cells we break the protein-cell bond and release the Iron particle w/protein from the cell and allow the unwanted material to be separated from the desired cells by magnetic attraction(getting the iron and protein out) and filtering of the serum and the cells to get the resultant stem cells for re-infusion into the patient.
This is an alternative to a bone marrow transplant. It is used for high dose chemotherapy in cancer patients and others to re-infuse the body with its own cells or a donors.
No I'm pretty sure chin chin uses a magnet to catch chromosomes
rick Green do you do stem cell research? if so im curious I have multiple level disc degeneration disease and in 2004 said my only surgical repair would be completely fusing my spine from buttocks to skull with ond titanium bar . can they repair destroyed spinal discs with stem cell research? I am really interested in living without pain !!!!
2helpusbuild@gmail.com
pray to chin chin he needs ur chromosomes
I am so sorry that you have so much pain. It is not my field of expertise and I am only an engineer of electronics and mechanics by hard times. I don't know anyone in that field. I am not sure if stem cells released into the body can do much change to those areas unless you concentrate them and then it must be done I would imagine many many times over as the areas and the mass must be high density and maybe hormonal programmed to replace those cells as when they infuse. As I recall the immediate use for the cells is the replacement of the marrow as the chemo has destroyed the marrow in the bones during the process.
A similar process was done with destroying tumors at one point and creating a magnetic field in the area of the tumor or for a time implantation of the magnet material in the area of the tumor but that was a failure or at least they dropped the research I really do not know what the failure was. They were using the magnet to attract a material bonded to the iron particles to kill the tumor and not replace the cells in that case. In the above case it seemed to me that the particles would have locked together and occluded the veinuals and would have done so to the veins over time or quickly and possibly an embolism could be caused by the prevention of flow in the area.
I have not seen anything in your area of the body, but there has been research done with rats or mice in where they grow cartilage formed on the back of an animal and it grows looking like an ear. I don't know the density of the cartilage or if it in fact is cartilage but if it can be done that is the research I would be looking for to help you. Sorry hope you can find the solution. Be of good cheer the Lord of all is coming soon.
Love your old video's. They NEVER get old. Unlike us!🤣🤍
why do you repeat the same thing 20+ times, that's a sign of someone trying to convince someone without them thinking about it, i'm one of those people that has a more openness to understanding science, so in a sense we people tend to over analyse things, well son you over talk
Ok here is the deal: I am extremely dyslexic and 51 . Son ultimately I was accademicly robbed. Where this is relavent is along with the learning issue I was given gifts . For example as the gyro was moving in the center I could see / visualise the flow in the air; looking up and to the right. I think in three dimensions
You are trying to teach and inform folks. You are a very smart dude , that is obvious You need to work on your method of teaching. The reason is this, the door to our brains are very heavy and being held up by a very fragile stick : Pride . If you want to be affective work on this .
Another point I am going to make is , inmo there are things that are taught in science and higher math that are not correct. Mostly because the origin of these principles was opinion that an individual strived to prove. It's human nature to want to be correct . To validate a life's work. What this does when these are put into process , is create an inadvertent state of compensation. Metaphhoricly steering between the lines that you have been tought .
What got me starting to contemplate this is questioning how someone with the gift I have am able to merely glimpse at a part that has been produced by an engineering department and say ; this is going prematurely fail . It's going to stretch x amount and be correct. I'm certainly not smarter then a department. One person can mess up a formula not a department. So something else was a factor and that is the method .
Its because hes taking blondes into consideration lack of brains but can take chrome off a bummper so Blondes do have purposes
thank you for the lesson ;-)
Can you show what it looks like through the magnetic film while you're spinning up & braking the flywheel?
Also, is there a way to propel force out of the divergence?
Do you sir propose that we are bound to the surface of the Earth by magnetic forces? I myself do not believe in the Gravitic Theory,(I wonder if i can say that? )
I might sound crazy I know but I am starting to wonder if the Sun and the Moon do truly involved in some courses around the earth and are themselves wrapped in this relationship between the fields. perhaps they have a coherence?
I also have to wonder if there is truly an Up and a Down?
I know! say what you will!
And no I don't claim to know, but my mental architecture is well built.
One of the best sayings I've heard from a regular human is something like, "Neither descriptions or accurate observation are equal to "explanation".
Thanks
donjohnswaggert i got a interesting theory for you. Density and buoyancy overcome gravity at all aspects. Now anything less dense wants to go up. For example helium. Some how a balloon overcomes all mighty gravity. When the earth cant escape the sun? Seems fishy. I personally believe that the sun and moon are super conductors held up by quantum locking. A super conductor quantum locked can hold 70000x its own weight. And can follow a fixed magnetic field. Look into it. Its very fasinating.
Both of you are too smart to be here. Please go save something with your thoughts. We need as many ppl like you two as we can get! And no, im not joking!
That is the gravity theory .
Zak Michalkow think of the light from the sun thru a convex lens converges at a spot where heat and a brightness is observed, and we can burn and start a fire to objects... the sun may be another convergent point of concentration from light or a high frequency (radiant watts) coming from another source... maybe the sun is not an object, but a nonphisical medium of sorts that could support the conveyance of some type of energy influence that could be eminating down thru the firmament from the heavenly realm above the waters on the firmament... just a few thoughts to ponder for ideas that make possible sence when you can see and understand some of the fe ingredients as real and true in the effects involved; and in turn to make such to be possibles to wonder about.
Keep wondering Lurch, Thing will be along soon to take you to Cousin It's planet Wolfe. You will go from the heat of Solaris where you will grow a lot of hair .But after truly reading and understanding your point of view, I find you are probably some troll like Christian influenced , brainwashed ideologically fear mongered idiom of thoughts irrelevant to how Solaris or ether is and how it works and wonder if you fathom the gravity theory of Newton's perceived noting. Quantum theories abound and some realized but still infancy takes many small steps until able to run. The other thoughts of gravity on this page are similar as usual.
Ken, I have to say: "you've done a brilliant job--presentations that are descriptively and cognitively accurate; finally physics is fun." -rph
p.s. still don't fully understand the dielectric and magnetic field conjugate; kind of like the staring at those pieces of artwork with a hidden picture of a boat or something, hiding behind black/white static.
I love these ancient videos!
Outstanding
Okay now design a beautifully simple generator using your theory & change the world 🤓
Exactly!
Can you wake me up when it's all over
Thank you
he simply is saying that Lenz force is not a factor in a properly designed generator or motor ,,and I made a few experiments of my own and I appreciate all the work he has done.because of his videos. I have done a few things with power generation that all the text books I read said is impossible..quit criticising his words and attitude and pay attention to what is being presented to u (think idiots) lol
I would luv to "know something" but this so bogged down in hyperboley', that attaining anything of real value just aint worth all the bull shitt
I see. I need not look for a 1955 edition of "Astounding Science Fiction Magazine". It's all here right before my eyes - wild guesses, keen theories, physicist's mumble jumble, unseen realities, I'm still waiting for the Great Ghoul to strike us with enlightenment.