The first time I saw Taylor Series in Calc II I had no idea what I was doing. Now that I'm taking D.Es, this is finally starting to make sense and I can say that having a good understanding of Taylor Series will prove to be extremely useful.
Pi is also wrong. It gives shorter circumference length if compared to the actual circunference in reality. Tiny arcs are confused with straight lines. It’s an ignoring of some length/area that is actually exist. What if the slice is so tiny till millions parts? They’re supposed to be counted as well. In fact, not.
I'm a bit late, but it's to bound its magnitude overall; if the error is positive, it should be less than or equal to a certain M. If the error is negative, it should be bigger than or equal to a certain (negative) M. So you get: -M
Yep, videos like this will earn you a total of a million subscribers! (sarcasm) Seriously though, you lost me with the fucking title. Remember me when I apply for a job in your corporation in ten years.
Dude wtf. Waste of time. I already knew the definition of what a remainder was. I did not need a 11 min lecture on that. This title is deceiving. Show my how to set it up.
Taylor is killing my GPA
I swear 😭
mine to
😭😭😭
real
died laughing when he said screen real-estate
It would be nice if you would include an example with it.......
I loved the colors in this vid :) makes studying a tiny bit better.
Thanks sal for this wonderful video..i really appreciate it..
The first time I saw Taylor Series in Calc II I had no idea what I was doing.
Now that I'm taking D.Es, this is finally starting to make sense and I can say
that having a good understanding of Taylor Series will prove to be extremely useful.
D. Es?
@@achingaster1199 differential equations i believe
I Really Like The Video Understanding the properties of the remainder or error function for an Nth degree Taylor approximation of a function From Your
8:39 its free real estate
i cant be more thankful bro u saved my day
LOL 5:20 not going to write subscript "to keep my hand fresh"
Very helpful, get some idea behind those equations, Thanks Khan!!
00:04 An "arbitrary" f(x) needs to have n+1 derivatives in the neighborhood of a according to your lesson.
Thank you for this.
you the best sal :)
Thanks Sal for the video
sal you are a legend
Pet Norvig and Sebastian Thrun reference Sal's videos on their ai-class website!
Excellent explanation! Cheers!
We should eat fresh
We should drink fresh
But most importantly we should keep our hand fresh
This is in the realms of numerical analysis.
wonderful. Thank you.
Great video
thanks alot
Nobody taught us like this 😭....thanku 👍
8:39
man i watched the first few minutes and i already understand my whole class hahahah
Pi is also wrong. It gives shorter circumference length if compared to the actual circunference in reality. Tiny arcs are confused with straight lines. It’s an ignoring of some length/area that is actually exist.
What if the slice is so tiny till millions parts? They’re supposed to be counted as well. In fact, not.
Pi isnt "wrong". Its just that any approximation for pi we use will be slightly smaller/bigger than pi seeing as it is irrational.
Very quality content
Only if there was a example in the video
this is awesome
what about from a to b?
helpful information. thanks~ XD
In my understanding n equal not N. to me n+1=N. So what is N+1? to me N+1 does not exist. If it is exist to you please show me how!! If you care.
N+1=n+1+1=n+2
I mean you answered your own question
How can u know everything I search
❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏 for the video
why n+1??
Why did he take the absolute value of the n+1th derivative of E(x)?
I'm a bit late, but it's to bound its magnitude overall; if the error is positive, it should be less than or equal to a certain M. If the error is negative, it should be bigger than or equal to a certain (negative) M. So you get: -M
@@5612dag Thank you.
didn't get it at all so confusing this course, change variable as his wish really confusing
my test is in a week and i would have been screwed
This is like one calculus course above me ._.
taylor gang
that would not be sucks if you include examples
@ChronoTriggerMusic o.O
0:30 tf is with this explanation???
patrickjmt has a way better video.
Deceiving title, waste of time. I want to see the Remainder Theorem in use, not an explanation of it I didn't need.
Cyrinika Hoxha deceiving? How? The title didn't say *Examples* now did it??
Want to see how it's used then go watch whatever video whose title contain the word "example"
This was a waste of time
Maia Carter Your mother.
your family.
🖕
zhina
Yep, videos like this will earn you a total of a million subscribers! (sarcasm)
Seriously though, you lost me with the fucking title.
Remember me when I apply for a job in your corporation in ten years.
Nice prediction, buddy.
This video would have a better like:dislike ratio if it included an actual example...
@wood9670 At least videos like this earns you several million bucks from Google and Bill Gates. ;)
Dude wtf. Waste of time. I already knew the definition of what a remainder was. I did not need a 11 min lecture on that. This title is deceiving. Show my how to set it up.
no one talks to Sal like that. You need to check yourself.
Its common sense, why do you need an example when you have it generally.
RE-----
TARD------
Don't encourage him!
zhina