€140m including Lukaku for a striker who doesn't even guarantee us a 30 goal season in the prem was way too risky, glad someone knocked sense in the SDs. Lukaku has been more prolific than Osimhen throughout his career and he still cost less when we signed him compared to what Napoli are demanding for Osimhen. For €140m we can get Olise, Sesko and a CB like Todibo or Yoro or even Tosin on a free and then put that money towards a GK like Bulka. That's the level of money we were asking the club to pay for ONE player. It never made any sense, it only makes sense for stupid clubs like PSG who have 2 100m strikers on their books and are still looking to sign him.
How a bunch of false ridiculous words on V.Osimhen, only for the bitterness of not be able to snatch him for fraud cheap low amounts or for fraud swaps..sad!
Chelsea was rejected both from V.Osimhen and Napoli, cause they tried to play jerks with both of them making ridiculous offers like they were talking to idiots, as the player has a release clause that must be paid in full and cash, telling Osimhen asking Napoli to go cheaper or asking Osimhen’s to low his fees demands, Chelsea is a tourist club!
Napoli are a cunning club there’s a reason why they got osihmen to sign an extra year with a release clause…..Napoli knew. They don’t care what happens with osihmen unless Napoli are paid
We only need osimhen if we can dump lukaku or sterling. Other than that we should get Sessko or another striker. Really need a lb cb and lw not a horseshoe.
€140m including Lukaku for a striker who doesn't even guarantee us a 30 goal season in the prem was way too risky, glad someone knocked sense in the SDs. Lukaku has been more prolific than Osimhen throughout his career and he still cost less when we signed him compared to what Napoli are demanding for Osimhen.
For €140m we can get Olise, Sesko and a CB like Todibo or Yoro or even Tosin on a free and then put that money towards a GK like Bulka. That's the level of money we were asking the club to pay for ONE player. It never made any sense, it only makes sense for stupid clubs like PSG who have 2 100m strikers on their books and are still looking to sign him.
How a bunch of false ridiculous words on V.Osimhen, only for the bitterness of not be able to snatch him for fraud cheap low amounts or for fraud swaps..sad!
Chelsea was rejected both from V.Osimhen and Napoli, cause they tried to play jerks with both of them making ridiculous offers like they were talking to idiots, as the player has a release clause that must be paid in full and cash, telling Osimhen asking Napoli to go cheaper or asking Osimhen’s to low his fees demands, Chelsea is a tourist club!
Napoli are a cunning club there’s a reason why they got osihmen to sign an extra year with a release clause…..Napoli knew. They don’t care what happens with osihmen unless Napoli are paid
Couldn’t care less he’s 100% not worth all that money.
Anybody who knows football know Sesko is a better striker than Jackson.
I agree. But you realise jackson is not a ST right?
how about Julian Alvarez?
Why would he ever leave City? especially for us…
@PedroNeves-hm5xm why did palmer leave city n come to us
We only need osimhen if we can dump lukaku or sterling. Other than that we should get Sessko or another striker. Really need a lb cb and lw not a horseshoe.
agreed Osimhen isn't worth £100M+ id rather Toney Sesko etc
Agreed bro