Design of isolated footing with Biaxial Moments | IOE TU PoU MU | Load from ETABS Analysis

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 63

  • @parangako5838
    @parangako5838 2 года назад +7

    Did you just make a scenario where the two moments are not acting at the same time? I thought this is for a biaxial moment analysis? In my mind it should be q = P/A +- 6MxRy/Ix +- 6MyRx/Iy?

    • @sanvihome1425
      @sanvihome1425 2 года назад +1

      Yes I think! What ever he have done is incorrect at place of calculating net upward pressure!

    • @rabin8793
      @rabin8793 Год назад

      ruclips.net/video/9CXMIpjtSs4/видео.html&feature=share

    • @jaybadoni8084
      @jaybadoni8084 Месяц назад

      @@sanvihome1425 is it incorrect to take both moments separately

    • @jaybadoni8084
      @jaybadoni8084 Месяц назад

      brother i am confused please enlighten me to understand ,or please share a link of biaxial footing designing

  • @gnidnoeled786
    @gnidnoeled786 7 месяцев назад

    Would you make a video, having column at the top right corner of the footing with Mx and My at the column? Looking forward for that video. Thanks in advance.

  • @mienge2177
    @mienge2177 4 года назад +2

    This is great video.Can you please go over mat foundation too. Is it the same for C channel column with foot plate? Thank you.

  • @beenay18
    @beenay18 7 месяцев назад

    thanks, your effort is appreciated.

  • @kaushikparmar6695
    @kaushikparmar6695 2 года назад +2

    While checking the footing for pressure, you do not need to factor loads. footing pressure is always checked for un-factored loads against net SBC value, as per your Soil report.

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  2 года назад

      Will check for factored soil bearing capacity. That will do it

    • @fahimakhtar1000
      @fahimakhtar1000 Год назад

      ​Both side 1.5 is cancelled out... there's no meaning of factored load and factored sbc😂

    • @vjyvncnt
      @vjyvncnt Год назад

      If we take factored load no need 1.5sbc
      If we take unfactored load we need 1.5sbc

    • @jaybadoni8084
      @jaybadoni8084 Месяц назад

      factored SBC is get by dividing SBC by 1.5 not multiplying

    • @kaushik1936
      @kaushik1936 Месяц назад

      Soil factors are usually higher than load factors

  • @fahimakhtar1000
    @fahimakhtar1000 Год назад

    Very conceptually explained 👌

  • @bobrobert8684
    @bobrobert8684 2 года назад

    Superb presentation. Thank you very much Sir. Please make a video for the design of transmission tower foundation .

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  2 года назад +1

      Thanks. Will upload a video on that soon.

  • @mohanbabupm5778
    @mohanbabupm5778 2 года назад

    Brilliant strlengr u had designed deploying law of similar things etc compared to grap.charts thanks

  • @theoneeureka
    @theoneeureka Год назад +1

    I think the section modulus for the moments have been calculated for opposite dimensions, any thoughts?

    • @gnidnoeled786
      @gnidnoeled786 7 месяцев назад

      In his diagram (the plan view), the vertical axis is labelled as X while the horizontal is Y. Thus his computation seems correct.

  • @jessyaji1602
    @jessyaji1602 3 года назад

    Very useful Lecture. THANKS

  • @soumenroy6203
    @soumenroy6203 6 месяцев назад

    Sir, in calculation of net soil pressure on footing, only axial load is to be considered, is self weight of footing will have to consider,

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  5 месяцев назад

      Yes, we need to consider it.

  • @beenay18
    @beenay18 7 месяцев назад

    to find stress along x axis, My should should be used, isn't it?
    since Mx is assumed to be moment about y axis from what is shown in the figure though it is unconventional, solution could be deemed as correct though some explanation might be needed, I guess.

  • @rajusahu5576
    @rajusahu5576 3 года назад +1

    This will be applicable for square footing????

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  3 года назад +2

      I have uploaded for square footing as well
      you can check that

    • @rajusahu5576
      @rajusahu5576 3 года назад

      @@civilconst isolated square footing with biaxial moment k liye bhi upload krdo

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  3 года назад +1

      The process is same. Reinforcement will be same in either direction.

  • @dendupgyeltshen1357
    @dendupgyeltshen1357 3 года назад +1

    While calculating section modulus, isnt the d refered is the depth of footing ? Rather than length and width of footing.

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  3 года назад

      Not in this case as we are considering x and y direction not Z direction.

    • @rabin8793
      @rabin8793 Год назад

      ruclips.net/video/9CXMIpjtSs4/видео.html&feature=share

  • @anand4236
    @anand4236 3 года назад +2

    Sir how do we know if the footing is subjected to bi-axial or uni-axial bending ...Can you please give details explanation how to know while design in this type of footing in real life design

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  3 года назад

      Biaxial means moment along two axis.

    • @anand4236
      @anand4236 3 года назад +1

      @@civilconst ...Sir if moment develops about two axes then there will be a eccentricity between load line and centroidal of footing ..Also the column should not equal projections on both axes ...But u took here the column at centre of footing then how it will become a eccentricity ...If a footing centroid and column load having eccentricity the only moment will produce ...In this video you did not mention the eccentricity

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  3 года назад +1

      @@anand4236 That's the idea here. Either you can consider eccentricity and provide footing size concerning it or design footing by considering the moments. In the first case, you will get equal pressure on either side as you have selected footing and column location considering eccentricity but in the later one, you will get different soil pressure due to moment value as the column is centrally located.
      Hope this helps you. Cheers

    • @anand4236
      @anand4236 3 года назад +1

      @@civilconst ...
      Yes sir i understood what you said....You gave one idea from this example how to design footing if footing is subjected moments but if you give the exact design of footing like ...in isolated footing When column is kept at corner of the footing and edge of the footing how pressure variation takes place ...How to check for one way and two way shear ...If possible please do each video on the column kept at corner and adge of the footing it will give more clarity

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  3 года назад +1

      @@anand4236 Sure will make that one soon.

  • @mohitjainvsa
    @mohitjainvsa 3 года назад

    Nice Video. Continue the work

  • @syedsufiyan5428
    @syedsufiyan5428 3 года назад +1

    Sir minimum ast you took small d but it should be D

    • @civilconst
      @civilconst  3 года назад

      Yeah. Considering gross area, we should take D.

  • @beenay18
    @beenay18 7 месяцев назад

    why is SBC multiplied by 1.5?

  • @kangkonkalita4561
    @kangkonkalita4561 2 года назад +1

    Time=25.25, %age of steel value is not correct. I think the equation is incorrect.

  • @everywheresports
    @everywheresports 3 года назад

    If it's longer span that you have considered than d2 should have been considered

  • @dhanashreejare3247
    @dhanashreejare3247 2 года назад

    Sbc can't be factored

  • @praveenkumar.k.v6674
    @praveenkumar.k.v6674 4 года назад

    This one is very very helpful. Thankyou so much.. can you please give your email id?

    • @rabin8793
      @rabin8793 Год назад

      ruclips.net/video/9CXMIpjtSs4/видео.html&feature=share

  • @VinodKumar-jk7mx
    @VinodKumar-jk7mx 3 года назад

    Sir provide pdf

    • @rabin8793
      @rabin8793 Год назад

      ruclips.net/video/9CXMIpjtSs4/видео.html&feature=share

  • @jaybadoni8084
    @jaybadoni8084 Месяц назад

    sir soil bearing capacity is divided by 1.5 not multiplied