First of all a very good channel you have created. Small, concise, three minutes models that lets one to listen in a tea break and then investigate the theory with data and other theories. I have subscribed to the channel and our team is preparing to highlight your channel into our Startup platform. Having said that, few pointers and critic about this model. Let's start with a distinction between Emotion, Sentiment and Psychology 1) Sentiment:- a narrative that acts as a bridge between the past and the predicted future to explain the present. Therefore any sentence with a past tense, and absolutely all sentences with the future tense are sentimental. For example: I have never stood second in school, and therefore will surely one day take my startup to the pinnacle of success. In this example(which is closely related to my life), you may observe that I used a word:- Never, which is not completely factual, because I have stood second or third several times. But on an aggregate my ranking first is more. But I selected an aggregate to represent the past. Therefore past is just a statistical aggregation, and not a coherent reality. The future tense, that is "I will surely achieve victory in the future" is a lame self-confirmation. This is because we can not even predict the next 10 seconds into the future. I don't know for sure if I would die immediately or even before this sentence is completed or not. 2) When we pack our narrative with aggregated past and predicted future, we are disassociated with reality. Such narratives misses several fine grained dimensions such as poverty as key driver in my childhood, modern economic vagueness and severely inflated Debt/GDP ratio as key deterrent to the future. 3) We talk affirmative sentence, only when we do not believe in them ourselves, to making us and others around us believe in a version of reality by repeated positive affirmation. 4) Golem effect therefore is a sentimental tool. 5) A psychology is a complete narrative of life with continuous autobiographical memory and not just episodic memory. Psychology is multidimensional, which includes memory, philosophy, physiology, history, family history, culture, social fabric, geography and many such dimensions that creates a more non-redundant complete reality of us with respect to several domains, and their intertwined space-time fabrics. We don't exist in isolation, but with respect to our existential fabric of space, time, and environment. 6) Thus, Golem effect is relevant for people with infantile defenses and narratives. This any all the sentimental tools promote laziness. These tools provide minimum data to the pre-frontal cortex to either contextualize reality, or to take executive decisions by layers and layers of simulation. It is like a chess engine. If you analyze the games at depth 1, even a 3-year old kid in his first learning game of chess will beat this computer. But when you take the analysis to depth 50, all the grandmasters together will fail to defeat the engine. 6) Any affirmation, positive or negative therefore is a mark of sentimentalism. Sentiment is a mark of impaired brain development and impaired prefrontal cortex. As such brain becomes more like a switch with "To do" or "Not to do" decision making, and the decisions are not decisions, but choices, and brain is not responsive but reactive. 7) Because sentiments take away the very thing that made humans the humans, the consciousness and pre-frontal cortex, sentiments reduce sensitivity, which is a base of empathy. Because sentiments eliminate empathy, our interaction with the environment becomes vague. So, whether Balmer said "We will be the number 1 in Mobile", or Musk said "We will go to Mars by 2025", these are sentiments and examples of impaired brains operating in limbic cortex. As sentiments converts humans into devolved lizard beings, the outcome of life is already aligned towards becoming one to suit the lizard world. a) Changing colors(continuous story changing) b) Big tongue( talking too much) c) Surviving on insects(by killing those powerless than you) d) Shading false tears(as lizards don't have empathy and thus parasympathetic as mammals) e) Selfishness(lizards have no society) f) Antisocial(Lizards have no society) g) No Spine:- And so such individuals continue to compromise and can't stand for their values. h) No gender: Lizards evolve towards eliminating male genders from the species. So, anyone reading this, adapt authenticity to check if your traits are and environment are becoming more lizard like, and whether you are using too many sentimental sentences in your communication(with self or with others). Objective of the life is not to "Grow" but to "evolve". A lizard who has more insects in the environment or 100% more lengthier than other lizards is still a lizard, afraid, fearful, sentimental, lagging empathy, emotions, and meaning of life. Embrace reality. Lastly thank you again for making this channel. I absolutely love the work you are doing.
First of all a very good channel you have created. Small, concise, three minutes models that lets one to listen in a tea break and then investigate the theory with data and other theories. I have subscribed to the channel and our team is preparing to highlight your channel into our Startup platform.
Having said that, few pointers and critic about this model.
Let's start with a distinction between Emotion, Sentiment and Psychology
1) Sentiment:- a narrative that acts as a bridge between the past and the predicted future to explain the present. Therefore any sentence with a past tense, and absolutely all sentences with the future tense are sentimental.
For example: I have never stood second in school, and therefore will surely one day take my startup to the pinnacle of success.
In this example(which is closely related to my life), you may observe that I used a word:- Never, which is not completely factual, because I have stood second or third several times. But on an aggregate my ranking first is more. But I selected an aggregate to represent the past. Therefore past is just a statistical aggregation, and not a coherent reality.
The future tense, that is "I will surely achieve victory in the future" is a lame self-confirmation. This is because we can not even predict the next 10 seconds into the future. I don't know for sure if I would die immediately or even before this sentence is completed or not.
2) When we pack our narrative with aggregated past and predicted future, we are disassociated with reality. Such narratives misses several fine grained dimensions such as poverty as key driver in my childhood, modern economic vagueness and severely inflated Debt/GDP ratio as key deterrent to the future.
3) We talk affirmative sentence, only when we do not believe in them ourselves, to making us and others around us believe in a version of reality by repeated positive affirmation.
4) Golem effect therefore is a sentimental tool.
5) A psychology is a complete narrative of life with continuous autobiographical memory and not just episodic memory. Psychology is multidimensional, which includes memory, philosophy, physiology, history, family history, culture, social fabric, geography and many such dimensions that creates a more non-redundant complete reality of us with respect to several domains, and their intertwined space-time fabrics. We don't exist in isolation, but with respect to our existential fabric of space, time, and environment.
6) Thus, Golem effect is relevant for people with infantile defenses and narratives. This any all the sentimental tools promote laziness. These tools provide minimum data to the pre-frontal cortex to either contextualize reality, or to take executive decisions by layers and layers of simulation.
It is like a chess engine. If you analyze the games at depth 1, even a 3-year old kid in his first learning game of chess will beat this computer. But when you take the analysis to depth 50, all the grandmasters together will fail to defeat the engine.
6) Any affirmation, positive or negative therefore is a mark of sentimentalism. Sentiment is a mark of impaired brain development and impaired prefrontal cortex. As such brain becomes more like a switch with "To do" or "Not to do" decision making, and the decisions are not decisions, but choices, and brain is not responsive but reactive.
7) Because sentiments take away the very thing that made humans the humans, the consciousness and pre-frontal cortex, sentiments reduce sensitivity, which is a base of empathy. Because sentiments eliminate empathy, our interaction with the environment becomes vague.
So, whether Balmer said "We will be the number 1 in Mobile", or Musk said "We will go to Mars by 2025", these are sentiments and examples of impaired brains operating in limbic cortex. As sentiments converts humans into devolved lizard beings, the outcome of life is already aligned towards becoming one to suit the lizard world.
a) Changing colors(continuous story changing)
b) Big tongue( talking too much)
c) Surviving on insects(by killing those powerless than you)
d) Shading false tears(as lizards don't have empathy and thus parasympathetic as mammals)
e) Selfishness(lizards have no society)
f) Antisocial(Lizards have no society)
g) No Spine:- And so such individuals continue to compromise and can't stand for their values.
h) No gender: Lizards evolve towards eliminating male genders from the species.
So, anyone reading this, adapt authenticity to check if your traits are and environment are becoming more lizard like, and whether you are using too many sentimental sentences in your communication(with self or with others). Objective of the life is not to "Grow" but to "evolve". A lizard who has more insects in the environment or 100% more lengthier than other lizards is still a lizard, afraid, fearful, sentimental, lagging empathy, emotions, and meaning of life. Embrace reality.
Lastly thank you again for making this channel. I absolutely love the work you are doing.