I have been victim of stalking since 2010, and earlier. Now stalking me has moved by criminals to being stalked by my own brothers, and some relatives, and neighbours. It is taking the forms of phoney calls, defamation, consistantly refusing job offer applications, harassments, and requesting to show my daily work scheduals. There is more to those harassmnets and I want to discuss how I can overcome this disaster.
Women lose much more in marriage than men. They usually end up getting stuck with the kids and a man who complains about having to pay for her to babysit them 24/7. And I've heard of MANY women getting screwed out of their property. ANd having to pay alimony ~even at times when SHE had full custody of the kids. I've also heard a woman say her male lawyer told her that her instance of marital rape was not criminal. He told her that when she got married, she gave her body to her husband to use as he wished. And this was in 2008!!!!!! Yeah, women are f#cked when it comes to marriage. The whole history of marriage is to make women become the property of a man. Of course, prior to marriage she was already the property of a man . . . . her father. Oh, I just keep remembering all the horror stories concerning men 'making out' in the divorce. There was a story several years ago of a man winning some sort of large-sum lottery during his divorce. He felt it was unfair that he would have to give some of that money to his ex-wife-to-be to care for the children. The woman made a decent salary (though I didn't check it against the cost of living where she lived, so it might not have been that much. But it was a very good wage considering the area I currently live in), but he didn't want to pay for his own doggone kids to have a life where they wouldn't have to worry about the house getting foreclosed on. And wouldn't you know that this sk@nk hadn't paid any child support up until that time, even though he wasn't living in the house and his ex-wife-to-be was babysitting them full time. You can probably find this article online somewhere, It was one of the more notorious headlines of the day at the time. I assure you, if roles were reversed (the woman won the money and the man had custody of the kids), the woman would be totally shamed not only for not giving MOST of the money 'to her kids', but also because she didn't have custody. I know this as I am a non-custodial female parent who has to pay support to my ex, who is a man. I got so shamed just for the simple fact of not having custody. I also got shamed for not giving 100% of my measly paycheck to my ex. "You should be grateful that he is willing to take care of the child." IT:S HIS OWN KID! Of course he should be taking care of them!!!! SO misogynistic. Our society is a d!ck to us women.
🙄 Oh god. I love hearing men whine about how allegedly they're so wronged by the court system. 🙄 The exact system made BY them/FOR them. If you're losing at you're own game, then you are complete trash anyway and don't deserve much.
"Woe unto you, lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." - Luke. XI, 52
Hello! My x gf has lied a year after breaking up and has filed for divorce even though I never married her and never agreed to marry. She changed the locks on me and took everything I own including my dogs and I still can’t get her out. I tried eviction court but the day after I filed for eviction she filed for divorce. She never brought a cent into the relationship and never paid any of our bills in our 4 years. I’m in shock over this. Is telling the court I never agreed enough? I’m reading a lot of mixed stuff. The house is mine and I paid every cent of all bills. She married someone else before we met and after 11 months divorced him and took a lot of his money. It is so stressful especially because I am in disability and unable to ever work again. She’s a professional con artist and seems to be very good at this. No joint taxes, bank accounts etc. Any advise would be really appreciated. Thanks so much!! I own the house in Texas.
This dude's a hack. I listened to his other YT video about regular & common law marriage. He was very very wrong. He claimed a person would lose 50% of property value in a divorce, even if the couple was married only a year. totally wrong! At least, in the state of Michigan (and probably most states). Michigan is an 'equitable distribution' state. Unless the divorce would leave one of the party destitute, the court takes into account how long the marriage lasted and who brought what income into the marriage. Furthermore, what one brings into the marriage leaves with that person in the divorce. Pre-marriage standing: House in her name? It's hers after the divorce. Car in his name? He gets it in the divorce. Everything acquired after the divorce is split up according to who can sustain that asset. Of course, the judge has a lot of say in this and has to do the best she/he can to make sure no one's left with an asset they can't afford AND make sure no one's left destitute. I would like to add, for those of you inquiring minds, I put this rant on this video because the comments on the other one was turned off. I guess this dude got a lot of flack for his misinfo on the other one ~that's probably why he turned comments off.
In Illinois, what you said is not true. You said the judge will divide based on the "ability to afford". The judge gave my ex my horse farm and land without ever having a job. The judge doesnt care about ability to afford. The ability to afford as you state is wrong. If your a man, plan on losing 80% of all your assests, you will be close to actual.
@@georgesontag2192 Oh horsefeathers. I get so sick of you men claiming you're the injured party in divorce. Just stuff it. There's much more to this story than you're telling. It's like when men complain about having to pay child support. When I ask these men "did you file for custody?" they say "No. A kid needs their mother." Well, according to them apparently, the child doesn't need the father . . . . except to complain that he doesn't want to take care of his child physically OR financially. And this is coming from a WOMAN who has to pay child support. And I can tell you numerous cases of women allegedly getting major losses in divorce. Just take your MRA nonsense elsewhere.
@@maryannvoll4195 That's my point! DUH! He's making a blanket statement. Total BS. Will NEVER trust this dude to represent me. If this was for Canada only, he should have limited the reach to Canadian viewers only OR put "Canada" or "Canadian laws" in the videos. I was searching for laws in the U.S. concerning common law (only a few states have ever acknowledged common law). This popped up when I typed in "Common law marriage in the U.S." SO he's not making it clear, at least to the algorithms of YT, that this is Canada-only laws.
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
I have been victim of stalking since 2010, and earlier. Now stalking me has moved by criminals to being stalked by my own brothers, and some relatives, and neighbours. It is taking the forms of phoney calls, defamation, consistantly refusing job offer applications, harassments, and requesting to show my daily work scheduals.
There is more to those harassmnets and I want to discuss how I can overcome this disaster.
If your a man with assests, don't get married. Let her come over once in a while but she has to go home when you get tired.
Women lose much more in marriage than men.
They usually end up getting stuck with the kids and a man who complains about having to pay for her to babysit them 24/7.
And I've heard of MANY women getting screwed out of their property. ANd having to pay alimony ~even at times when SHE had full custody of the kids.
I've also heard a woman say her male lawyer told her that her instance of marital rape was not criminal. He told her that when she got married, she gave her body to her husband to use as he wished. And this was in 2008!!!!!!
Yeah, women are f#cked when it comes to marriage.
The whole history of marriage is to make women become the property of a man.
Of course, prior to marriage she was already the property of a man . . . . her father.
Oh, I just keep remembering all the horror stories concerning men 'making out' in the divorce.
There was a story several years ago of a man winning some sort of large-sum lottery during his divorce. He felt it was unfair that he would have to give some of that money to his ex-wife-to-be to care for the children.
The woman made a decent salary (though I didn't check it against the cost of living where she lived, so it might not have been that much. But it was a very good wage considering the area I currently live in), but he didn't want to pay for his own doggone kids to have a life where they wouldn't have to worry about the house getting foreclosed on.
And wouldn't you know that this sk@nk hadn't paid any child support up until that time, even though he wasn't living in the house and his ex-wife-to-be was babysitting them full time.
You can probably find this article online somewhere, It was one of the more notorious headlines of the day at the time.
I assure you, if roles were reversed (the woman won the money and the man had custody of the kids), the woman would be totally shamed not only for not giving MOST of the money 'to her kids', but also because she didn't have custody.
I know this as I am a non-custodial female parent who has to pay support to my ex, who is a man. I got so shamed just for the simple fact of not having custody.
I also got shamed for not giving 100% of my measly paycheck to my ex. "You should be grateful that he is willing to take care of the child."
IT:S HIS OWN KID! Of course he should be taking care of them!!!!
SO misogynistic. Our society is a d!ck to us women.
🙄 Oh god. I love hearing men whine about how allegedly they're so wronged by the court system. 🙄
The exact system made BY them/FOR them.
If you're losing at you're own game, then you are complete trash anyway and don't deserve much.
"Woe unto you, lawyers! For ye have taken away
the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves,
and them that were entering in ye hindered." - Luke. XI, 52
Dats crazy. Good content for my video essay 😂💯
Hello! My x gf has lied a year after breaking up and has filed for divorce even though I never married her and never agreed to marry. She changed the locks on me and took everything I own including my dogs and I still can’t get her out. I tried eviction court but the day after I filed for eviction she filed for divorce. She never brought a cent into the relationship and never paid any of our bills in our 4 years. I’m in shock over this. Is telling the court I never agreed enough? I’m reading a lot of mixed stuff. The house is mine and I paid every cent of all bills. She married someone else before we met and after 11 months divorced him and took a lot of his money. It is so stressful especially because I am in disability and unable to ever work again. She’s a professional con artist and seems to be very good at this. No joint taxes, bank accounts etc. Any advise would be really appreciated. Thanks so much!! I own the house in Texas.
If we make a will and we live as common law and have 2 non family members sign...is it binding?
Can I hire you...
You're talkin my lingo!
2022
Bristers blisters lawyer liers
This dude's a hack. I listened to his other YT video about regular & common law marriage. He was very very wrong.
He claimed a person would lose 50% of property value in a divorce, even if the couple was married only a year.
totally wrong! At least, in the state of Michigan (and probably most states).
Michigan is an 'equitable distribution' state.
Unless the divorce would leave one of the party destitute, the court takes into account how long the marriage lasted and who brought what income into the marriage.
Furthermore, what one brings into the marriage leaves with that person in the divorce.
Pre-marriage standing: House in her name? It's hers after the divorce. Car in his name? He gets it in the divorce.
Everything acquired after the divorce is split up according to who can sustain that asset.
Of course, the judge has a lot of say in this and has to do the best she/he can to make sure no one's left with an asset they can't afford AND make sure no one's left destitute.
I would like to add, for those of you inquiring minds, I put this rant on this video because the comments on the other one was turned off.
I guess this dude got a lot of flack for his misinfo on the other one ~that's probably why he turned comments off.
This guy is in Canada. The laws are probably different than Michigan.
In Illinois, what you said is not true. You said the judge will divide based on the "ability to afford". The judge gave my ex my horse farm and land without ever having a job. The judge doesnt care about ability to afford. The ability to afford as you state is wrong. If your a man, plan on losing 80% of all your assests, you will be close to actual.
@@georgesontag2192 Oh horsefeathers. I get so sick of you men claiming you're the injured party in divorce.
Just stuff it.
There's much more to this story than you're telling.
It's like when men complain about having to pay child support.
When I ask these men "did you file for custody?" they say "No. A kid needs their mother." Well, according to them apparently, the child doesn't need the father . . . . except to complain that he doesn't want to take care of his child physically OR financially.
And this is coming from a WOMAN who has to pay child support.
And I can tell you numerous cases of women allegedly getting major losses in divorce.
Just take your MRA nonsense elsewhere.
Canada's provinces as USA's states have their own rules. Some different, some the same.
@@maryannvoll4195 That's my point! DUH!
He's making a blanket statement.
Total BS.
Will NEVER trust this dude to represent me.
If this was for Canada only, he should have limited the reach to Canadian viewers only OR put "Canada" or "Canadian laws" in the videos.
I was searching for laws in the U.S. concerning common law (only a few states have ever acknowledged common law). This popped up when I typed in "Common law marriage in the U.S." SO he's not making it clear, at least to the algorithms of YT, that this is Canada-only laws.