How would you play? | Exercise Solution | Decision Making in Chess | IM Alex Astaneh

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @formalbook4087
    @formalbook4087 3 года назад +4

    Great valuable lessons 👍

  • @Radioheadtrip
    @Radioheadtrip 4 года назад +10

    Hey guys, keep up the fantastic instruction! Your channel is super underrated

    • @Chessfactor
      @Chessfactor  4 года назад +1

      Thanks for your nice comment!

  • @SureshBabu-yo8vb
    @SureshBabu-yo8vb 4 года назад +2

    I have learned something new today. Thanks Alex for the good explanation.

  • @rachelthomas9962
    @rachelthomas9962 4 года назад +3

    Goldmine. Yes please for more.

    • @Chessfactor
      @Chessfactor  4 года назад +1

      Let's see what we can do for you.

  • @marksteddom6941
    @marksteddom6941 4 года назад +2

    Very good. I got the active/passive part right, but didn’t pick the best move. Thanks for this instructive series!

    • @Chessfactor
      @Chessfactor  4 года назад +1

      You're welcome! Next time you will do better 😉

  • @mrtbhdr
    @mrtbhdr 4 года назад +2

    these series are super awesome, will watch them again at weekend and will try to understand why i failed and how can i improve my weaknesses. guess which channel will use to improve my game=)

  • @schachbetrachtungen1242
    @schachbetrachtungen1242 4 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot for this video series. I never looked at moves this way before - in terms of these two categories, active/passive or whatever one wants to call them. Seems like a very useful concept - more than once I've played aggressive moves without considering first if my position is actually ready for it, without looking at what king safety and piece activity would suggest. The material presented here could have helped avoid these mistakes. Very instructive content, please keep going!

  • @toesdoeswhoknows704
    @toesdoeswhoknows704 4 года назад +1

    Damn I saw the pawn on g6 was weak but completely forgot about the x-ray the rook had on g6. Glad I was right about the first position though.

  • @manvendrasingh7838
    @manvendrasingh7838 4 года назад +5

    Today is Indian National Sports Day.
    Because Hockey Wizard born today:
    Major Dhayan Chand!

  • @yakinimoseley6792
    @yakinimoseley6792 4 года назад +1

    I remembered that you were saying that the scanning method is too time consuming, which it is. So, I was hoping to see the follow up series where criteria creates candidtate moves. In other words, considering moves based on time, piece quality, king safety, pawn structure, space and material advantage.

    • @yakinimoseley6792
      @yakinimoseley6792 4 года назад

      In other words, I thoughts this video would be about the faster way to play, where you pick candidate moves based on the above criteria. No complains, however, you are excellent. I first found you when I was trying to work on my visualization.

    • @vatsala6497
      @vatsala6497 4 года назад +1

      Wait but isn’t considering time, piece quality, king safety, pawn and material adv also scanning

    • @vatsala6497
      @vatsala6497 4 года назад +1

      But I think the answer to your question is merely pattern recognition ie just analyze games to understand the players decisions with for example a tempo adv or weaker king safety

    • @yakinimoseley6792
      @yakinimoseley6792 4 года назад

      @@vatsala6497 So from what i am understanding, studying the games would be the follow up lesson to scanning. I do study patter recognitions like the bishop sacrifice, and other common mating patterns. I also study games, like I am currently trying organize the ideas and positions of the scotch. Thanks for the reply.

    • @vatsala6497
      @vatsala6497 4 года назад

      @@yakinimoseley6792 No problem!