[MCA] Temple of Febe Legendary Cerus CM | Tempest | GW2 Strikes
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 фев 2025
- I really like this fight. This is our first kill of this encounter. The progression took us about 23 hours over 7 days.
I played a very defensive Tempest Build to reduce the healing pressure in the last 10%.
I messed my Fire Bullets up at some point and didnt notice...
Log: dps.report/8vq...
Other PoV's:
Virtuoso (FlizzyFler.3791): • [MCA] Temple of Febe L...
Tempest (Frenzy.9283): • Gw2 Cerus CM Legendary...
Virtuoso (TheGoldenSky.8074): • [MCA] Legendary Cerus ...
Virtuoso (Svertin.7298): • [MCA] Temple of Febe |...
Tempest (Angrax.9420): • [MCA] Temple of Febe L...
Scourge (AvatardesKahine.7650): • [MCA] Legendary Cerus ...
Druid (BrIcK.7258): • [MCA] Legendary Cerus ...
the healers were doing some crazy gaming in that last phase
Gz, any chance you could post the build somewhere? Assuming there is at least some trailblazer in there?
It is full Trailblazer and Signet of Earth, the rest is normal Condi Tempest as you can find it on snowcrows
and i thought u play tempest for rebound xd
how do you have Stacks of Bloodlust before this fight? cheats?
How else are you supposed to kill it? :O
sigil exploit ? 25 stack befor the fight ?
Just get enough kill participation
it's from mca fullclear
The answer makes no sense. Normally the stacks are lost after a wipe so how did you manage to have 25 stacks before the start of the fight? surely a bug exploit?@@Angrax
@@nobodyknowme471its the normal functionality of stacking sigils as it is everywhere in the game, nothing special in this instance
please... don't take me for a donkey. the stack is reset after each death or instance change. so how can you stack knowing that there are no mobs before the fight.@@Angrax
exploit kill :|
Care to explain what you mean by that?
@@Angrax referring to the sigil stacks, clearly not intended for this instance and seems to make a noticeable difference
@@AngraxIf you're not even willing to explain how the strat works in public, you shouldn't be surprised that people call it an exploit
@@_zakk If it would be an exploit, i better should not explain it. Could get me in trouble, right?
@@Angrax damn; you surely are a jackass