That's Why Nobody Wants To Mess With This Beast

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 мар 2024
  • Check out to our science channel ► Brain Impact: / brainimpact
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 61

  • @jamesjohnson1710
    @jamesjohnson1710 2 месяца назад +5

    Let's face it the Germans have made some of the best tanks since WW2 and this one is no exception

    • @ph11p3540
      @ph11p3540 Месяц назад

      That is subjective but overall you are right. The Germans learns some hard lessons from their WW2 tanks where they were excessively overengineered and logistical support was a nightmare as tank variants had zero parts compatibility with each other

  • @mikes.4136
    @mikes.4136 2 месяца назад +3

    The KF-41 Lynx is an excellent platform! 😊

  • @garyknight3
    @garyknight3 2 месяца назад +3

    Scanning radar sticks out like a sore thumb.... how small a weapon would it take to knock it out?

  • @moman0166
    @moman0166 2 месяца назад +2

    Where is the dealership so I can buy one.

  • @Richard-vt7it
    @Richard-vt7it 2 месяца назад +4

    The M1 a2 has a120 mm smoothbore main gun. Only the m1 had a 105 riffled main gun.

    • @armanzen
      @armanzen 2 месяца назад

      That’s what I was going to say lol

    • @martinrasmussen7754
      @martinrasmussen7754 2 месяца назад

      And so what mr clever.

    • @Richard-vt7it
      @Richard-vt7it 2 месяца назад

      @@armanzen I was around them for 8 yrs unfortunately.

    • @Richard-vt7it
      @Richard-vt7it 2 месяца назад

      @@martinrasmussen7754 Mr A Hole. If you have nothing to add to the conversation keep your childish opinion to yourself. I know enough about a tank I was around for 8 years. OK A Hole. Nothing to add to the conversation so they have to their ignorance. And you do it well.

  • @jeffrymilton1093
    @jeffrymilton1093 2 месяца назад

    HIMARS is a game changer.

  • @HikerBikerMoter
    @HikerBikerMoter 2 месяца назад

    1. Too heavy (70tons) to cross bridges, soft ground or carry on a plane
    2. Too costly $11,000,000.00 million
    3. Huge, complex maintenance support

  • @seanpreston3653
    @seanpreston3653 2 месяца назад +2

    Lynx looks like its gonna give the bradley a run for its money

  • @A-world-of-My-Own
    @A-world-of-My-Own 2 месяца назад

    And its GREEN!

  • @Infinityfields
    @Infinityfields 2 месяца назад +1

    When they say a road range of 190 miles, they better have a long supply of fuel trucks to feed this diesel guzzler. I am not sure where this mini tank is going to fit in. Is it because it is lighter and less armored than the M-1 A2 that it can go places the M-1 can’t? Also why put a 105 on it when they could have a 120 to match the M-1 A2? Having the same ammunition makes sense for compatibility between the 2 different tanks. I hate to be negative but this vehicle seems less of a tank and more an IFV but without the Infantry.
    Why aren’t they coming up with a replacement vehicle for the M-1 with all the new info we have found out with tank vulnerabilities versus drones in the Ukraine conflict?

    • @darkrevenger04
      @darkrevenger04 2 месяца назад

      The export model Abrahms being sent to Ukraine dont have the same armor as US Abrahms so they wont withstand the same amount of damage or in same spots. This vehicle isnt a tank or ifv. it is a high mobility rocket launcher.

  • @GM-fh5jp
    @GM-fh5jp 2 месяца назад +2

    Nice long video with info on cool hardware you don't see much.
    Thumbs up from me.
    Thanks for posting!
    Subscribed.

    • @spotlight9864
      @spotlight9864  2 месяца назад +1

      Thank you for your comment ) Appreciate

  • @winfordnettles3292
    @winfordnettles3292 2 месяца назад +1

    What company builds the vehicle for the HIMARS system?

    • @alp3274
      @alp3274 2 месяца назад

      Lockheed Martin builds it. One of the big 5 that makes everything for the American military.

    • @user-ns5kv2rj5k
      @user-ns5kv2rj5k 2 месяца назад

      Is the US the only one that uses explosive armor to reduce shaped charges

    • @alp3274
      @alp3274 2 месяца назад

      @@user-ns5kv2rj5k No. Nato, Russia and I'm guessing China all have them.

  • @SeanHorton-ky6ds
    @SeanHorton-ky6ds 2 месяца назад +2

    They rock.

  • @AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys
    @AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys Месяц назад

    Himas artilary system's are, very good. Roa Aotearoa nui.

  • @jasonnichols7813
    @jasonnichols7813 2 месяца назад +1

    Sweet

  • @johntimlin6664
    @johntimlin6664 2 месяца назад

    Wouldnt these be part of the ADA companys

  • @tironsimmons1568
    @tironsimmons1568 18 дней назад

    Nice

  • @Cherrypopperland
    @Cherrypopperland 2 месяца назад +1

    Himars is awesome in many ways, an incredible piece of technology, but economy is not its strength. A single missile can cost millions, in comparison to a GPS guided artillery shell costing a fraction with roughly same effect albeit not as far away...

  • @garyknight3
    @garyknight3 2 месяца назад

    Could use some self-defense; just in case. Ma Deuce, and/or rpg system of some sort. The proof will be in the pudding; just put it out there and see how it does in the real world. There may be modifications.

  • @jimmyzhang9134
    @jimmyzhang9134 2 месяца назад

    Why does this sound more like an ad? Edit the first 20 mins sounded like an ad.

    • @c.guydubois8270
      @c.guydubois8270 2 месяца назад +1

      Propaganda....

    • @charleslord8672
      @charleslord8672 2 месяца назад

      It is, very slyly constructed. Notice the proving grounds? Ft Sill. More ordinance tested there than you can wrap your mind around. Collectively, since before, during and after, WWII! MIND BOGGLING!

    • @charleslord8672
      @charleslord8672 2 месяца назад

      ​@@c.guydubois8270yep, so... what's your point?

    • @charleslord8672
      @charleslord8672 2 месяца назад +1

      Actually it's a brief history lesson, if you're paying attention

    • @charleslord8672
      @charleslord8672 2 месяца назад

      ​@@c.guydubois8270more like a history of.... some badass weapons

  • @CREvothegreater
    @CREvothegreater 2 месяца назад +2

    game changer....in russias favor?.....

  • @Tonik-13
    @Tonik-13 2 месяца назад

    Will this monster stop Russia?

    • @jamesanagnos6123
      @jamesanagnos6123 2 месяца назад +4

      Nope lol

    • @dragononwall8733
      @dragononwall8733 2 месяца назад

      Yes!

    • @jamesanagnos6123
      @jamesanagnos6123 2 месяца назад

      @@dragononwall8733 you must be delusional have it checked asap lol

    • @UnyahPe1601
      @UnyahPe1601 2 месяца назад

      What If US/Israel Can Build the Invincible Monster and appears from no way Infront of the enemies noses, Tom & Jerry's monster. 😬🥺😧😵🥵🤕🙉🙉🙉🙈🙈🙈

  • @garyknight3
    @garyknight3 2 месяца назад

    ...goes in hand; insane tank/insane price...

  • @GholaTleilaxu
    @GholaTleilaxu 2 месяца назад

    HIIMARS is the opposite of affordability and sustainability, it is a money and material sink.

  • @RicardoJr.Feliciano
    @RicardoJr.Feliciano 2 месяца назад

    45😅😮0

  • @julessambou4794
    @julessambou4794 2 месяца назад

    i love germany thir are great and intelect people
    slava ukraine

  • @xXturbo86Xx
    @xXturbo86Xx Месяц назад

    Western military hardware is grossly overrated and overpriced.

  • @bradlyjohnson52000
    @bradlyjohnson52000 15 дней назад

    looks

  • @bo45
    @bo45 2 месяца назад +1

    I wouldn't want it after me, or mine.

  • @jamesanagnos6123
    @jamesanagnos6123 2 месяца назад +8

    another Bradly waste of money

  • @milchopoposki1453
    @milchopoposki1453 2 месяца назад

    MORE LIES...

    • @jamesanagnos6123
      @jamesanagnos6123 2 месяца назад +2

      to be fair they are trying to sell it lol

    • @UnyahPe1601
      @UnyahPe1601 2 месяца назад

      No more Salesmen. 👍

  • @bradlyjohnson52000
    @bradlyjohnson52000 15 дней назад

    looks