The America’s Next Super Aircraft Carrier - USS John F. Kennedy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 май 2024
  • "CVN-79 USS John F. Kennedy” will be the latest addition to the fleet of the US Navy. After completing its construction in 2025, this giant aircraft carrier will be added to the U.S. Pacific fleet, providing its assistance in power projection, maritime security, and humanitarian assistance operations around the world. This will be the second warship that belongs to the Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier.
    #usmilitary #usnavy #navy

Комментарии • 142

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et 21 день назад +26

    THIS CARRIER WILL COST MORE THAN 13 BILLION USA DOLLARS.

    • @Across_Media
      @Across_Media  20 дней назад +2

      costs will increase every year.

    • @NotMeJustborrowed
      @NotMeJustborrowed 7 дней назад

      A perfect example would be movie called War of Archimedes, This are only mock up expenditures, surely some of it will go straight to their pockets.........

    • @w.m.e.cantinoobtrader1334
      @w.m.e.cantinoobtrader1334 7 дней назад +1

      China would or russia would build it for 2 billion dollars.. in usa labour cost is too high then atleat 50% need to be a profit for company

    • @dennisestradda9746
      @dennisestradda9746 День назад

      @@w.m.e.cantinoobtrader1334haha tofu steel Chyna and smoke stack ruskiland

  • @sgt.grinch3299
    @sgt.grinch3299 11 дней назад +24

    We need 200 new frigates to protect these magnificent ships.

    • @stephen7701
      @stephen7701 2 дня назад +1

      how about we get 40 built thats planned and not take 12 years just to build the first 1 not due until 2029!!

    • @rileyh2675
      @rileyh2675 2 дня назад

      I think they should like promote you or something.

    • @petru-alexandrudragusin7124
      @petru-alexandrudragusin7124 11 часов назад

      What about swarms of marine drones? Look only on how effective they are in the Black Sea in the Ruso Ukrainian conflict

  • @TechMil
    @TechMil 19 дней назад +10

    The U.S Next Super Aircraft Carrier

  • @deviantfoxyswag3161
    @deviantfoxyswag3161 5 дней назад +13

    As a someone once said, we have money for war but no money for our own people in need.

    • @timmilder8313
      @timmilder8313 2 дня назад

      this generates much of our standard of living.
      Gotta keep everyone else in line.

    • @jager898
      @jager898 17 часов назад +1

      I would rather have Russia and China in check. Think more of the future and not now.

  • @laskey2175
    @laskey2175 20 дней назад +7

    A moving city.

  • @charleyzacharia9878
    @charleyzacharia9878 7 дней назад +4

    Russia doesn’t even have reliable aircraft carrier , they have one and it’s really old , it breaks down a lot, technically they don’t have it .
    In the meantime China I believe they have 2 and building the third one , If I’m mistaken but they have never been tested
    These facts tell you how superior the US aircraft carriers are

    • @kimloonyong6599
      @kimloonyong6599 6 дней назад +4

      Technology wise US aircraft carriers are better.
      China have 3 aircraft carriers and are building the fourth. Latest news i heard it was they launch drone carrier instead. Much smaller in size than conventional carrier.

    • @claytonbigbsy3880
      @claytonbigbsy3880 День назад

      From what I have read the Russians and Chinas are not trying to compete with the US carries but instead have opted to build a massive amount of nuke subs, which currently outnumber the US by a decent amount if the article is factual.

  • @claytonbigbsy3880
    @claytonbigbsy3880 День назад +1

    Spreading freedom! God Bless!

  • @ricardoantonio5085
    @ricardoantonio5085 3 дня назад +8

    Back and forth arguments here for how great or how stupid this country is. The truth is that 75.4% of the people in other countries would choose to live here if not in their own.

    • @KindaGross
      @KindaGross 2 дня назад +1

      weird I read it was 75.364567687656% of the worlds population.

  • @robotgeant9788
    @robotgeant9788 11 часов назад +2

    People when america makes new weapons: imagine how many houses could be built with that kind of money !
    People when russia makes new weapons: how can russia’s economy still grow faster than the one of the country’s sanctioning it ?
    (I’ve seen both those comments)

  • @nanky432
    @nanky432 3 минуты назад

    Call me crazy, but I would have preferred a couple more modern submarines which are safe from modern ballistic missiles and can patrol unnoticed under the ocean.

  • @davegallo8166
    @davegallo8166 6 дней назад

    The original "big John" is still waiting to be scrapped at Philadelphia Navy Yard

  • @claytonbigbsy3880
    @claytonbigbsy3880 День назад +1

    Can we please use the same reactors to power our cities?

    • @dannyzero692
      @dannyzero692 21 час назад

      You better vote for people who are willing to do it

    • @nekopop8159
      @nekopop8159 Час назад

      We already have nuclear reactors. But the ones used on those ships are probably smaller and more compact to save up space.

  • @cocomarsh1
    @cocomarsh1 7 дней назад +2

    of course it'll have f-35s

  • @thanotorious7561
    @thanotorious7561 День назад

    sources links?

  • @DoNotDisseminate
    @DoNotDisseminate 22 дня назад +8

    This is only 25% of the size it should be !

    • @papatoushrew
      @papatoushrew 2 дня назад +1

      Do you have a source on this? Want to read about the origibal specs.

  • @CRSForester
    @CRSForester 16 дней назад +2

    Peace thru Strength! #America

  • @spambunny23
    @spambunny23 4 часа назад

    13 billion dollars! Imagine how many frozen microwave burritos one could buy with that money, instead of buying a ship for murdering kittens at sea.

  • @francofava8818
    @francofava8818 6 дней назад

    😍😍😍

  • @sgt.grinch3299
    @sgt.grinch3299 11 дней назад +5

    The price of sovereignty is high. The human cost and financial burden is great, but if you never had to engage the enemy, you’re lucky. America exists because strong men do dirty jobs. Weak people cause hard times. Hardcore men solve hard times.

    • @stuartemmanuel3735
      @stuartemmanuel3735 10 дней назад +2

      No, strong man does what is right for their country by not building more weapons, but solving problems with the current US system, and for their fellow men, weak man seek to preserve the status quo.

    • @RK-cj4oc
      @RK-cj4oc 19 часов назад

      ​@@stuartemmanuel3735 If you dont build weapons it will be far worse for the US. Stop being delusional.

  • @Doggiedogedog
    @Doggiedogedog 13 дней назад

    I think it’s more important to build more destroyers and frigates. If they add this they will thin out carrier escort ships overall

  • @supagirusupagiru9932
    @supagirusupagiru9932 11 дней назад +4

    34 trillion usd debt and counting.

    • @leoAguilar-kx1pj
      @leoAguilar-kx1pj 9 дней назад +1

      All country have a debt 😂

    • @supagirusupagiru9932
      @supagirusupagiru9932 9 дней назад +2

      @@leoAguilar-kx1pj not all country have biggest debt in human history

    • @jg5875
      @jg5875 5 дней назад

      Agreed our national debt is exceptionally high. Can’t ignore it….at some point need to start paying it down and running surpluses

    • @Henry-xu5jg
      @Henry-xu5jg 2 дня назад

      @@jg5875that’ll never happen

    • @RK-cj4oc
      @RK-cj4oc 19 часов назад

      ​@@jg5875The US is paying debt every year. It is why so much is loaned to the US.

  • @abdswitch7810
    @abdswitch7810 5 часов назад

    I think it’s only limited to ve ised against countries or groups who have no chance or retaliating… don’t get me wrong there’s nothing wring in showing strength… but I don’t think aircraft carriers will do well in the next world war…

  • @flaneurfilms1940
    @flaneurfilms1940 День назад

    Big shiny target for DF-21

    • @xyzaex
      @xyzaex 20 часов назад

      lol try and your country is no more 🤣

    • @hibatulwafi2523
      @hibatulwafi2523 16 часов назад

      The US Navy is not as stupid as you

  • @MAC_CUACHIN
    @MAC_CUACHIN 10 дней назад +1

    AMERICA🇺🇲

  • @kma3647
    @kma3647 2 дня назад

    Share your thoughts:
    Me: how many cheap Chinese missiles will it take to overwhelm the AAA defenses on the entire carrier battle group and get one to hit one of those two nuclear reactors, wasting $13 billlion, 9,000 sailors, and contaminating that part of the ocean for the rest of our species' existence? I bet they won't have to spend $13 billion to get enough of those missiles to do it. This is a vanity project, a luxury that we frankly can't afford anymore, especially not with the idiots in charge of the State Dept and DoD right now. You can't just paint the flight deck with a gay rainbow, crew the ship with trannies, and think that's going to accomplish anything.

    • @greerjones9472
      @greerjones9472 День назад +1

      So your problem has nothing to do with weapons procurement, which you obviously know nothing about. You're problem is about "wokeness", which truthfully I don't give a fuck about, the Navy can choose to do whatever the fuck they want and support whatever causes they choose to if it makes the crews happy. They know how to do their jobs on that carrier and that's the important part, trans not trans, could care less. If you can targets weapons, maintain battle systems, sortie aircraft, why does it matter? Does them not doing that automatically make them better?
      Carriers are the premiere surface vessel, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. They're not invincible sure, but they're still basically mobile fortresses which can move in and out of protective rings, can dish out punishment quick and harsh, and are basically global information centers.
      If an attack is ever going to seriously harm the operability of a USN carrier, it's not going to be some " cheap missile" because "cheap missiles" is like swatting flies, and it's not going to be without relations as an entire swarm of warplanes, bombers, and return fire pulverize anything and everything in retaliation.

  • @thomasg4324
    @thomasg4324 7 часов назад

    *WHAT A WASTE !!!*
    I'd rather have a 1990 Nimitz than a 2024 Ford. #Corruption

  • @kevin2028
    @kevin2028 5 дней назад

    It is absurd that it has been delayed this long with so many cost overruns. Our congress is asleep at the wheel. This is what happens when you shrink the number of military companies receiving government contracts to build our weapons system from guns to jets to ships. It is basic supply and demand economics. If you have only a few companies that can carry out work like Shipbuilding and fighter jets, then it's going to cost you more. Ukraine has proven that you need a lot of attritable systems. 13 Billion for one ship that takes 30 years to build just won't cut it. This kind of shit leaves us very vulnerable in a peer-to-peer conflict. The only thing we have working for us is how inept Russia and China are at the moment. Too many companies in the defense industry were allowed to consolidate and merge, and this is the result; all our weapons systems are absurdly expensive, and if we got into a shooting war with China, which is currently acting like a bag of dicks, we'd be in trouble.

  • @eleventy-seven
    @eleventy-seven 8 дней назад

    Most notably, the Nimitz class. Carriers will be 250% more reliable.

  • @bencris982
    @bencris982 17 часов назад

    It's powerful so long as it avoids the Houthis.

    • @giacomogiacomo1194
      @giacomogiacomo1194 14 часов назад

      Never show up your stupidity in the comment section 🤣

  • @jimgrif5998
    @jimgrif5998 10 дней назад +4

    Corruption is going to break the American bank. There is no honor in the world.

  • @ninodino444
    @ninodino444 7 дней назад

    How can you make videos nowadays and don´t have the metric system included...... hell normaly you should ditch the imperial system and just use the metric system... but at least do both....

  • @jackoshea7668
    @jackoshea7668 15 дней назад +3

    This floating Target can be taken out with two hypersonic missiles that cost a fraction of one of the planes on board.😮

    • @LiterallyMojo
      @LiterallyMojo 12 дней назад +5

      Armchair expert over here.
      Please continue thinking this way so that russians don't actually try to develop something that could actually do what you say

    • @jackoshea7668
      @jackoshea7668 12 дней назад

      @@LiterallyMojo do you think they don’t already know?

    • @CrazyDee279
      @CrazyDee279 10 дней назад

      Apparently this meathead never been in the military. 2 hypersonic missiles, lmao. Not one Carrier taken out WW2. Gee, nothing is around the Carrier to protect her I guess. LMAO

    • @mineralwater6736
      @mineralwater6736 2 дня назад +1

      @@jackoshea7668😂😂 if the Russians or the Chinese could do that the would already done it but guess what?? They can’t.

    • @jackoshea7668
      @jackoshea7668 2 дня назад

      @@mineralwater6736 only because they haven’t yet had the opportunity mate, but I wouldn’t like to see my theory tested .There is no defence against a hypersonic missile. 🤣🤣

  • @CliftonSimon4924
    @CliftonSimon4924 3 дня назад

    Another garage

  • @89firebird
    @89firebird 12 дней назад +3

    But yet our bridges and roadways are falling apart Stick it to the taxpayers what else

    • @wtftiger666
      @wtftiger666 8 дней назад +1

      How about stop wasting money on other government spending. Welfare and other social bullshit

  • @donaldlouie7354
    @donaldlouie7354 9 часов назад

    Dang, and one F35 is $115 billion....

    • @itsallgoodaversa
      @itsallgoodaversa 9 часов назад

      No, it’s $85 million. Can you provide your source? You are over 1000 times off.

  • @TheTruthBeHidden
    @TheTruthBeHidden 7 дней назад +1

    Grow up

  • @justindressler5992
    @justindressler5992 14 дней назад

    They should just order a carrier from China they build a new carrier every two years and have more ship yards than half the globe. Probably get three for the price of one.

  • @ijatpingrhyb
    @ijatpingrhyb 13 дней назад +7

    It can still be sunk. Money would have been better spent on housing.

    • @Meself-xt7ej
      @Meself-xt7ej 10 дней назад

      Give me some money.

    • @mineralwater6736
      @mineralwater6736 2 дня назад +1

      Ok go tell that to all the rich celebrities.

    • @mineralwater6736
      @mineralwater6736 2 дня назад +1

      And houses can still be destroyed.

    • @dennisestradda9746
      @dennisestradda9746 День назад

      Haha chyna , 800 million poor rural han make less than 5 dollars, no healthcare or safety net besides real-estate. Oh wait thats collapsing too

    • @greerjones9472
      @greerjones9472 День назад +1

      Houses can still collapse. The fuck are you on about?

  • @michelmichel6292
    @michelmichel6292 День назад

    this is the most stupid video in 2024

  • @edwincolon3857
    @edwincolon3857 20 дней назад +36

    Imagine!!!, how many houses you can build for the poorest people and how many meals we can buy for the hungry in this country with that kind of money 😢.

    • @urosjovanovic3142
      @urosjovanovic3142 19 дней назад +29

      Both things are important

    • @radustana
      @radustana 19 дней назад +10

      womp womp

    • @markf37talon
      @markf37talon 19 дней назад +51

      Imagine!!!, how many house would be destroyed and how many people would be starving, if China determines its capable of overtaking Taiwan.

    • @TO-dl2gg
      @TO-dl2gg 18 дней назад +8

      Imagine if we stopped giving our money to everyone else we’d be more than able to do both ..Have carriers and take care of our less fortunate fellow citizens!!!!

    • @tommypaget2294
      @tommypaget2294 18 дней назад

      And then America will conquered by China?

  • @geraldhardy4257
    @geraldhardy4257 8 дней назад

    Build the carriers and build housing for those who need it and for once please stop whining about money because all money is is worthless paper no matter which nation prints it. GOD DID NOT NEED MONEY TO DO WHAT HE DID. MONEY IS MAN'S WAY OF CONTROLLING MANKIND BY WAY OF GREED. MONEY IS POWER BUT KNOWLEDGE IS REALLY MORE POWERFUL THAN MONEY.

    • @mineralwater6736
      @mineralwater6736 2 дня назад

      😂😂 ok buddy good luck surviving with just knowledge.