To truly understand China, Kevin Rudd has to get out of his Anglo-Saxon thinking. The reason why China has strengthened the state's oversight of capital is to avoid repeating the mistakes of the British and Americans: turning the country into a cartel controlled by capital to benefit special interests. After decades of development, many wealthy people have emerged in China. If the government does not strengthen supervision over them, the interests of the people will not be protected. China's goal is to achieve common prosperity.
This makes very little sense. It makes 2 massive assumptions: 1) that the government knows best. 2) that the politicians are not motivated by greed themselves. Time and time again throughout history, applying a top down approach to goods & services for citizens results at best in inefficiency, and at worst in disastrous gaps in basic goods. In the West, supply & demand drives market efficiencies & innovations. But of course it’s not enough, so their governments have provided more & more regulations and socialist features to protect citizens
@@AcidRooster It makes little sense in the Western setting, but it makes perfect sense in China. To understand that, you have to understand Chinese culture and the highest moral pursuit of the Confucianism: 天下大同 - a world where everyone lives in harmony and peace. This moral pursuit is also the basis why socialism can be widely accepted in China. 1. Only the government can have the power to balance, for the working class, the social and political monopoly by the richest class, like what's happened prevalently in the west. 2. China's leadership cares more about people's interests than most Western governments do, at least for now. Hard to believe? Because China's leadership consists of social elites that grew from the roots; they are sons and daughters of the working class. True, they are not elected to work for the working class, but they are born and raised to do that. It's in their blood to strive to improve the living conditions of the people. Will China become more like the West in the future when we have a much larger middle class? I don't know. But that's another topic.
@@AcidRooster Dude, so you're saying that the West is not corrupted at all? How did Nancy Pelosi, Lindsey Graham, Joe Biden, DJ Trump... these muderfckers got rich in the first place? Where did the "deep state" come from? China claims itself as a socialist country and yet it practices capitalism, it is a tight rope balancing act but the Chinese are doing well if compared to the West collectively.
This guy just sucks. He as typical of any Anglo Saxon politicians or so called professional looks at whatever Xi did almost in a negative perspective. In communism, it is all about equal distribution of wealth for all the citizens. And of course, China adopted capitalism to grow its economy and thus created many billionaires along the line. But the flip side is it also create unequal distribution of wealth where the richer getting richer and the poor getting poorer. And worst still, corruption has grown from bad to worst. This can be seen in many of the Western economies (oops which they champion so much) where the 10% of the rich controlled 80% of the country wealth. What is Ma without the economy size of China economy which the state have meticulously built? This is not in line with the concept of communism. Therefore the state have to intervene with adjustment to the economy system even at the cost of growth. Isn't this is what democracy is all about? Equal opportunity for all to share the wealth of prosperity. A classic example is Xi clamp down hard on the private education system where it gives advantage to the children of the rich as compare to the poor which if left unchecked will bring great consequences in society harmony and unity. There are many policies Xi implemented to check the trend of unequal opportunity which existed in the Western society. After isn't equality is what democracy is all about? Isnt it this is what the state should do? Oops may be not in the Western so called democratic countries where the politicians have to give in to the rich for their election campaign funding.
I am an Overseas Chinese. From my limited understanding and based on my observations of China after Xi Jin Ping took over the reign and his utterances and performance, I am inclined to believe that Xi is a benevolent, sincere, intelligent and courageous leader. Influenced by his understanding and belief in the Confucian and Buddhist teachings, Xi genuinely has the welfare of the Chinese populace, the Chinese nation and the entire humankind in a righteous, sustainable, far-sighted, and a win-win manner in accordance of the universal truth, goodness, and beauty. On top of all these, he also has the wisdom, courage, patience, and skill to ride the storms and steer the mother vessel to a peaceful, harmonious, and safe destination. I would rate him a an near-perfect sagely ruler, worthy of the respect and support of all peace-loving people of the world . 我是一名海外华人。以我有限的了解，以及对习近平执政后的中国社会的观察，以及他的言行，我由衷相信习近平主席是一位仁慈、真诚、智慧和勇敢的领导人。受儒家和佛家思想的影响，习近平真正以正义、可持续、长远和共赢的方式，按照宇宙真善美的原则，为中国人民、中华民族和全人类谋福利。除此之外，他还有智慧、勇气、耐心和技巧，能够驾驭风浪，带领这艘诺亚方舟驶向和平、幸福与安全的目的地。我认为他是一位近乎完美的圣人领袖，值得全世界爱好和平的人拥护与支持。
His entire life epitomized the ruthless opportunism of the Anglo-Saxon Puritan mindset. His understanding and interpretation of China were akin to a pack of wolves strategizing an ambush. From his perspective, the civilized and gentle characteristics of China, known for its etiquette, were not worth sharing or promoting. Instead, his aim was more about eradicating it, targeting the Eastern people with yellow skin who were most resistant to submission. It is truly tragic.
Throwing a few Chinese phrases here n there does not make him a China expert or read Xi Jin ping well. Kishore, Professor Wolff and others seem to understand China more.
Wasting time, however I watched twice just want to make sure every single point of his is BS, quite disappointed in his talk this time, change my opinion on him
In practice, human right in the US divides into many levels depending on the races: 1/White Caucasian. 2/Black 3/Hispanic 4/illegal immigrant 5/Asian (within this group: Japanese, Indian, Filipinos, Korean, Vietnamese, ... and Chinese ) The Chinese was the last because, in the US history, Chinese was considered as sub-human species , merely provide cheap labor for the railroad, and after that only survive on either laundry and cheap Chinese food services. The European and Japanese were looking down on Chinese because of the nature of Chinese never want to be aggressive or to fight only want to make money. Throughout its history, even with its huge population, it let Mongolian and Manchurian invaded and ruled. Even on the golden time of China dynasties, instead of crushing its much weaker neighbors, it selected to build a defensive wall, now called the Great Wall. Chinese suffered very frequently with big starvation in which ten of millions people died. Under Mao, there was no exception, yet China never want to touch its neighbors like Thailand, Malaysia to secure food (unlike Japanese to invade the whole Asia to secure the needed material by forces, even before the WWII ).
rudd's first surprise says it all - he has never understood china & chinese. he might have learned the language but he has never taken off his anglo glasses
Do you really understand China? Understanding is not the same as being able to speak the local language. Many people can speak English, but it does not mean that they understand the United Kingdom and the United States...
You spent forty years researching almost ten fallacies! And from time to time, you humorously and elegantly immerse yourself in them. You are not a lion; just because you often hear a lion's roar, you think you understand lions. In reality, you have always been a kangaroo. Just do your own thing. There's no need to spend so much time researching some really impractical, outdated issues. The world is constantly changing, and keeping up with the times is something every person, every country, and every leader must face. Show more understanding, respect, and tolerance, and your expression will not be so heavy. Thank you. Although you can express yourself in Chinese, try to use less Chinese when speaking in English. However, I suggest that you deeply study Chinese traditional culture, especially Chinese poetry. In that field, you might find it helps you break out of Xi Jinping's way of thinking. Clearly, your so-called rational thinking research has been influenced by Xi Jinping for too long. There's an old Chinese saying: "The onlooker sees more clearly than the player." When you look at Xi Jinping, others are also observing you. Using a fixed Western mindset cannot adequately interpret China's issues. Given that you spent forty minutes promoting the ideas in your book, I must commend you for your persistence. Keep it up, and make good use of your time to do something meaningful!
Nah. This so called China " expert" is just another clone of all the other similarly western PhDeed " experts" ricocheting and echoing the same old narratives and " findings". No new insights nor in depth understanding of subtle nuances in civilizational and cultural differences. Just because he speaks Mandarin slightly better than the next white guy, he thinks he's an " expert". His condescending tone and delusional sense of " superiority" and perspectives on keeping China "where it should be" ie compliant and submissive to western hegemony and it's so called " rules based order" is typically Colonialistic and downright racist. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. I'm not a betting person but if I were, I'd put my money on China continuing to lift the standard of living and quality of life for its peoples for many years to come whilst the collective West will correspondingly continue to decline with shorter life expectancy, increasing poverty and homelessness, rapid rise in crime and lawlessness etc etc. As the 90% of the global majority is noticing and waking up to the changing world order observed - China builds whilst the collective West ably led by the terrorist rogue state Banana Republic of America (BRA), DESTROYS !!!
How China sees the world should ask the Chinese leaders and academians or refer to the Chinese history. Why ask an Anglo-American? I can still remember him constantly asking when is China going to become like one of them
China has never had the appetite to rule the world instead China has had helping many nations improve their economy and build schools to education children and adults to improve their life to depart from proverty....
Really hope you can go to Xinjiang and see for yourself, and not be fooled by wrong reports, so that you can understand that those inhumane events did not actually happen in Xinjiang...
There were a group of smart blind persons having the opportunity to touch an elephant. Each of them proudly and accurately described the parts that they touched...
I lost interest when he said "human rights". For all Western scholars out there, don't even mention human rights for at least a decade unless you had had an opinion on Gaza's sufferings. Enough said.
You are an Chinese expert as well as Westerner's scammers? you ideology are based on West and not based on East culture. You still have a long way to go. China needs not have to behave that way but all these methodology are from the west. Understand , Please spend time taking care of Australia interest first before lecture others.
If this guy Rudd knew what he was doing, he would still be Prime Minister of Australia. And if Xi made the same kind of career moves, Xi would have found himself appointed Ambassador also.
Ask yourself a very simple question: " does any one of your friends knows you in and out, deep down inside who you really are and what appeared to be predictable WILL become what he assumes?" Don't waste your time in your assumptions when " ASSUME " has been equated to " making an ASS out of U and ME " Good luck, embassador
Interestingly, Kevin did not run the Australian economic well he is was PM, making him one of the short live PM in history. Here he is trying to tell China how to run its economy. He uses his fluent in Chinese to show that he knows China. In his point of view it is better for China to do nothing.
This video seems to have been recorded before 2022. Geopolitics has changed since then especially with BRICS and own-currency trades. I am not convinced that suppressing the business elites in a reflection of Circle 3 (common prosperity) is in order to keep Circle 1 intact (CPC always in power).
陆克文提到一个关键的时间点：2017。正是川普的贸易战，对华为，tiktok的打压，才使得很大一个比例的中国人忽然认识到：喂喂，说好的全球化，自由贸易，比较优势，保护私产…等等，还是最基本的规则吗？然后拜登先是带来修正：老川只是一个意外，马上回复正常。结果是，川令拜随，并且改群殴了。这样，还指望中国不变？
您看油管要翻墙么？如果还要翻墙，这是全球化么？
@@springyang2531 我不用翻墙。全球化和翻墙有什么关系？你怎么不问特朗普为什么修墙？美国不全球化？
陆克文喜欢把自己扭曲的观点定义为习近平的观点。这种人的观点没啥价值。就是一个高级的中南海听床师。估计是整理了外面一堆烂人的地摊文学后形成了他自己40年的中国观点。笑死人。
@@springyang2531 是否需要翻墙和国家是否全球化完全是两个不对等的事件，他们之间没有充分必要的关系
@@springyang2531 Globalism is a TERM for trade. Not for social media. Gosh. You need a bigger brain size
陆克文完全从西方世界的角度来理解中国。如果没有习的转变，现在的中国也许会更富有，但绝对是贫富极其悬殊，像马云应该是富可抵国，同时也会有大量的贫困人口。说战狼外交，哪个国家比得上美国好战，中国一直在防守，只是中国不善于宣传而已。至于说人权，看看现在的加沙，就知道西方政客口中的人权就是个笑话。
马云通过引入投资者，仅仅是充当国际金融巨鳄的操盘人，让外国财阀逐步控制中国金融，左右政治。
不是中国不善于词令。是西方强盗垄断了西方媒体。
他不理解的是：如果没有习近平强硬拔乱反正，共产党腐败问题已经伤害到执政根基了，国家会乱，那将是一场大灾难。
中国不善于宣传是好事，所以，陆克文也是战忽局的，他在帮中共迷惑西方，知己知彼百战不殆嘛，陆克文的目的就是保证西方不知中国
非常同意
To truly understand China, Kevin Rudd has to get out of his Anglo-Saxon thinking. The reason why China has strengthened the state's oversight of capital is to avoid repeating the mistakes of the British and Americans: turning the country into a cartel controlled by capital to benefit special interests. After decades of development, many wealthy people have emerged in China. If the government does not strengthen supervision over them, the interests of the people will not be protected. China's goal is to achieve common prosperity.
This makes very little sense. It makes 2 massive assumptions:
1) that the government knows best.
2) that the politicians are not motivated by greed themselves.
Time and time again throughout history, applying a top down approach to goods & services for citizens results at best in inefficiency, and at worst in disastrous gaps in basic goods.
In the West, supply & demand drives market efficiencies & innovations. But of course it’s not enough, so their governments have provided more & more regulations and socialist features to protect citizens
@@AcidRooster It makes little sense in the Western setting, but it makes perfect sense in China. To understand that, you have to understand Chinese culture and the highest moral pursuit of the Confucianism: 天下大同 - a world where everyone lives in harmony and peace. This moral pursuit is also the basis why socialism can be widely accepted in China.
1. Only the government can have the power to balance, for the working class, the social and political monopoly by the richest class, like what's happened prevalently in the west.
2. China's leadership cares more about people's interests than most Western governments do, at least for now. Hard to believe? Because China's leadership consists of social elites that grew from the roots; they are sons and daughters of the working class. True, they are not elected to work for the working class, but they are born and raised to do that. It's in their blood to strive to improve the living conditions of the people.
Will China become more like the West in the future when we have a much larger middle class? I don't know. But that's another topic.
@@AcidRooster Dude, so you're saying that the West is not corrupted at all? How did Nancy Pelosi, Lindsey Graham, Joe Biden, DJ Trump... these muderfckers got rich in the first place? Where did the "deep state" come from? China claims itself as a socialist country and yet it practices capitalism, it is a tight rope balancing act but the Chinese are doing well if compared to the West collectively.
According to him, “China’s goal is to becoming indispensable to the world without firing a shot”. Isn’t that the best way becoming an empire?
How can we now pressure China with universal human rights when now nobody believes we do?
陸克文這個研究中國經濟40年的"專家"會認為中國經濟增長放緩是純粹中國內部問題? 他是把美國加整個西方國家和其盟國都當白痴? 原來全面圍堵中國和制裁大量中國公司,全面貿易戰,經融戰,科技戰都不會影響中國經濟? 中國可不像俄羅斯有石油可以賣,所有經濟活動全得靠自己. 如果陸克文都可以當中國加經濟專家,那西方國家沒救了.
这又何尝不是一种外宣呢
@@eddiezhu-y3w 是的，陆克文也是战忽局的，他在帮中共迷惑西方，知己知彼百战不殆嘛，陆克文的目的就是保证西方不知中国
你說的100%正確。中國經濟發展這幾年變慢，至少一大半是因為美國挾同它所有傀儡國對中國的全方位全力打壓所致。
但中國沒有其它選擇。
---------------------所谓的十个同心圆顶唯一功能就是，，增加趣味性，，跟实际的世界没什么关系
---------------------主要这个模型，，也算不上模型是图样图森破，真正模型要考虑的东西很多，根本不是这种线性的关系
---------------------比如有几个圆是重要，，但根本不用维护，因为基本不会变化，有些圆是要付出一半以上的努力的，却被放在后面的位置
---------------------同时圆也是相互影响的，有权重的，就像人体的九大系统，，哪个有毛病你也好不了
---------------------当然，用人体来形容是抬举他了，因为他这几个是胡诌的--------其实根本原因是陸克文的智力要差一些，，我观察大部分搞政治的都有这个问题
當中國加經濟專家,西方國家沒 Lan Jau 了
This guy just sucks. He as typical of any Anglo Saxon politicians or so called professional looks at whatever Xi did almost in a negative perspective. In communism, it is all about equal distribution of wealth for all the citizens. And of course, China adopted capitalism to grow its economy and thus created many billionaires along the line. But the flip side is it also create unequal distribution of wealth where the richer getting richer and the poor getting poorer. And worst still, corruption has grown from bad to worst. This can be seen in many of the Western economies (oops which they champion so much) where the 10% of the rich controlled 80% of the country wealth. What is Ma without the economy size of China economy which the state have meticulously built? This is not in line with the concept of communism. Therefore the state have to intervene with adjustment to the economy system even at the cost of growth. Isn't this is what democracy is all about? Equal opportunity for all to share the wealth of prosperity. A classic example is Xi clamp down hard on the private education system where it gives advantage to the children of the rich as compare to the poor which if left unchecked will bring great consequences in society harmony and unity. There are many policies Xi implemented to check the trend of unequal opportunity which existed in the Western society. After isn't equality is what democracy is all about? Isnt it this is what the state should do? Oops may be not in the Western so called democratic countries where the politicians have to give in to the rich for their election campaign funding.
技巧很多，策略很多，也想像了很多人民的需要...
但，就像一個家庭，父母太能幹了，幾乎能上天下地地為孩子拿到一切，計畫一切，可就是不許孩子自己有跟父母不一樣的看法、想法。你把我設計好的活出來就對了！！！
不能配合？那再教育，直到你能看到我的設計有多麼好，多麼適合你！！！！
而西方是...我的孩子不是我的孩子，我的錢也不一定是孩子的錢。孩子，你得創造一個屬於你自己的世界，你要真心地去活出自己，並融入世界...有衝突的時候，那也正是展現你獨有特質的時候，我為你感到開心，爸爸欣賞你！！！
对不起西方一样的会把自己财产给后代这是人性你所说的都是底层人@@yuchz9718
@@yuchz9718 大部分人民的需求是有个和平稳定、丰衣足食、安全舒适、分配公平、人权平等的生活环境，这是中国政府最主要的施政目标。你所谓的有不一样看法的孩子，只要不和实现这个目标冲突，政府才不会管你。西方所宣传的价值观，让中国人看，就是个笑话！给你自由，让你自己决定性别的自由，让你有持枪的自由，让你有嗑药的自由，让你有无限放大自己欲望的自由，最终，社会变的无序，变的肮脏，变的危险！当一个爸爸看到一个自称性别是狗的孩子，看到一个嗑药磕到睡在路边的帐篷里的孩子，看到被抢劫犯枪击倒地的孩子，看到口中宣扬民主自由，但是游行支持以色列种族灭绝行为的孩子，请问：这位西方的父亲会作何感想？这样的社会所宣扬普世价值的唯一目的的就是分化普通民众，让资本精英的权利得到最大的保障！你的傲慢与偏见也是西方价值观塑造的结果！现在的昂撒体系都是靠着掠夺积攒的本钱，等着看吧，什么时候吃完老本，人吃人的社会将会重现！
非常精准独到的见解🎉🎉🎉@@staralend5765
太对了。
硏究中國40年得出這樣的結論，真替他難過🙁歸根究底侵略者的思維是沒法理解儒家思想的大同世界
切入點錯＋傲慢西方霸權思維看中國，永遠都會看錯！
他对中国的认识很肤浅。 他觉得应该“群狼”合力将中国板下来 这是昂格鲁萨斯顿的立场。看来此老也不是什么好东西。
He's true Anglo Saxon mentality.
他自己说主持人好像变向地问他if "you have wasted your time" 答案是"yes, you have."
他是要說給外國人聽的。你那儒家的大同世界人家聽不懂，也不理解。效果等於零。
西方总是认为经济增长变慢是共产党执政的问题，那那些债台高筑的西方国家，经济奔溃的第三世界国家是谁的问题？ 在过去的2023，有哪个重要的发达国家的经济表现有超过中国？
中国的债问题也不小。出了北上广深几乎都在崩溃。
@@KXYZ32 真的吗？ 多看看cnn，bbc 中共早就可以完蛋了。
@@KXYZ32 主要是房地产的产业链很长，房地产业过快收缩造成了失业问题，这是个痛苦的过程，但是能看出转型速度很快，问题并不严重
为啥要在意西方怎么认为？千万别高估他们的智商。多年的生活经验积累😂
@@KXYZ32房价高的时候抱怨房价 打房又抱怨经济不好 这共产党是真难干啊
陸克文學習中文但沒學會學懂中國文化，所以也沒有能力將人類文化提高到另一個層次。東西方文化各有優勢，陸克文沒能讓西方世界融入中國優點。在一帶一陸方面，可以用狹隘角度解釋，也可以用宏觀意義來看，絲綢之路是一條東西方千年貿易之路，一帶一陸是使用基礎建設將絲綢之路現代化、效率化、經濟化，交通便利化對大家都有好處，特別是中亞內陸國家，可以擺脫因地理限制造成的千年貧困。
😅内亚也就是1600年以后开始衰弱的，之前一直比东亚富裕，纺丝技术也是外伊朗地区长期领先中原。
为什么战狼外交？美国等一直想着分裂中国，经济制裁，支持台独菲律宾等，难道中国就只能任人宰割？ 虽然我不喜欢共产党很多方面，但是对于这个真霸权主义假专家感到很恶心，一个国家的外交政策也是基于国际形势，美国带着他们的小弟们一直想办法打压别人，难道就不容许别人反抗了？
@@Kyuestma 有这种专家，对中国来说是好事。
@@Kyuestma你錯了 台灣本來就獨立主權。毛澤東一開始就想要獨立。是權力使之腐爛。
@@iequinox 台灣本來就獨立主權?
1912中華民國繼承中國，南京成立
1945中華民國以"中國"名義接收台灣
1949中華人民共和國在北京成立
1971中華人民共和國"取代"中華民國 成為中國
賴神:台灣已是主權獨立的國家，名字叫中華民國
(中華民國"又"在台灣獨立了，台灣"又"從中華民國獨立了)
中國是不斷學習，不斷總結，不斷吸取自己和國際經驗教訓，發展自己的經濟，富民強國，中國文化儒釋道幾千年，萬變不離其宗！
2008北京奧運的時候，全世界最大關注的是空氣污染的問題，
但現在幾乎再也沒有聽過空氣污染這種說法，到處都是藍天白雲。
沒想到習近平的這10年中國改善的地方也很多阿。外面的人都一直以為是大退步。至少我收到的訊息是這樣。
整个欧美为什么今天不断被挑战？习近平为什么转向？就是大家都看到了美国外强中干，继续跟着美国的这种靠资本游戏，靠发债，靠印美元的路线已经行不通了， 在加上科技战争让中国看到美国的科技已经不行了，不惜靠使拌子方式遏制中国，这种不自信让中国人看透了，实际上就是不行了。与其和美国的债务绑在一起被同归于尽，还不如早早离开，发展自己的方式，所以为什么中国人特别喜欢马思克
雖然陸克文的中文很好
但是他竟然完全錯誤解讀了中國人對自己對世界的看法，尤其他闡述對於中國改變過往成功模式轉向新的成長模式大惑不解，認為是個錯誤？這樣守舊派的頭腦實在很讓人吃驚！以他這樣中英文俱佳的政治人物尚且如此，其它根本沒能力了解中國的西方政客是什麼等級可想而知
這裡出現可怕的資訊不對稱，中國有巨量中英文流暢的專家深刻看透比較雙方的優劣，而澳洲只有一個陸克文，而且他還出錯
美國也就那幾個漢學家，能力如何不知道，但肯定不在決策圈裡
如此較量
勝敗已分
中華文明在清朝時被圍毆，某種程度是因為在行為與思想上封閉自己太久了，跟不上時代，跟不上科學進步下的生產力。甚至中華祖廟(文明)都被砸了。
中華大地上的年輕人出國找新工具，新思想，想修祖廟，重振中華。一群人帶回來馬列主義，共產主義，另一群帶回資本主義，民主主義。但別忘了，這都只是修祖廟的工具。
結果台灣把 民主/自由 這工具請上神壇，磕頭狂拜，不容挑釁。大陸也把修祖廟的工具拱上神壇，對著鐮刀斧頭也是磕頭狂拜，信奉如神靈。
只有鄧小平同志保持清醒，工具就是工具，工具應為我所用，為中國人所用，故"中國特色社會主義"。工具是拿來修中華祖廟的，不是上神桌膜拜的。
所以別把 馬克思主義 捧的太高，就是把幹農活的鐮刀，不能釣魚，也不能炒菜。
@@merrick6484今日中國共產黨就是吃虧在這個點上。
從1848共產黨宣言開始，基督教神權的資本主義國家認定‘共產主義’是死對頭，只要中國共產黨持續以馬列思想領銜，就不會改變圍堵策略。中國共產黨如果捨不得馬列思想這塊招牌，無論再怎麼解釋‘中國特色社會主義’，永遠會被資本主義國家視為敵對。
中國共產黨以馬列思想共產主義奪權，是他的建國礎石與政權正當性。哪怕在往儒家化與法家化演變，也只聲稱是‘中國特色社會主義’，而不願定義一個中國史觀的社會主義。
既然有喊出‘中華民族偉大復興’的民族自信，何不研究如何定義‘中華社會主義’？並與馬列思想狹隘的共產主義劃清界線。
與其和西方國家打爛仗，倒不如嘗試用全新的歷史觀，向華人群體與世界各國，說清楚講明白，改頭換面，建立22世紀新中國的框架。
@@edwardchen1071 我认为所谓的”死对头“只是攻击对方的一种手段，是什么样的制度不是关键，而是实力是否对他们的地位有挑战。有很多现实例子可以证明：苏联时期是“共产主义”可俄罗斯不是啊，但西方还是一如既往的攻击（北约东扩，俄罗斯想加入老美不同意）；日本是西方盟友，经济要超越时一纸广场协议打下来；中国是“共产主义”应是”死对头“，美苏争霸后期老美为了遏制苏联，与中国关系可以说是蜜里调油，要什么给什么大力支持，苏联解体后关系立即急转直下；口喊反对独裁，面对沙特那个君主独裁国家却只字不提。如果想让中国和老美搞好关系，其一，是中国一直贫穷然后各种依赖老美，惟老美之命是从才可以；其二，中国实力超过老美，让他不敢觊觎不敢挑战中国，关系才会变好。正所谓：匹夫无罪怀璧其罪。
@@ggwang9025 共產主義的無神論和唯物史觀，恰恰戳破西洋統治階級一貫的宗教外衣與資本剝削。兩者是從根本上相對立，心理上不相容，不共戴天哪～ 衝突明朗化是遲早的事。
有些人顯然很健忘啊，已經完全忘記了2010、2011年左右中國社會是怎麼樣的了。
大多數中國人的看法：政府上下全面的明目彰膽的腐敗，社會貧富差距越來越大，環境（空氣、河流、山林）被污染被破壞越來越嚴重，民眾對政府完全失去了信任。
換句話說，再發展下去就會象一個“更有錢但更糟糕”的印度，
所以很多人說，習救了共產黨；也有人說，從某種意義上，他也救了中國。
习主席反腐非常果断，大手笔！不过反腐是从胡锦涛主席就开始了，只是力度没有那么大（上一任的控制影响仍在，阻力极大），胡开了个头，打了些基础。可能现在有人已经忘记了当初被嘲讽的“和谐社会”，正是 “和谐社会”政策引导下的‘’维稳‘’制止了普通人民被残酷剥夺，虽然有些事情过头了，但有时矫枉必须过正才能回到正。最可庆幸的是，作为胡的继任习主席有智慧、有胆识、有魄力、有信念相同的人相助，而他自己“不负人民”的信念也异常坚定。
确实从改革开放后，中国就没有真正意义的反腐部门，几十年下来地方保护伞猖獗。都成了一个个小圈子为了自己的利益在大搞大揽根本没人关心环境
不管别人怎么说，至少我自己视野里的，自习上台以后，贪污腐败明显减少了，以前不干净的那些人非常恨习。
是啊：当时大陆内部悲观情绪到了极点， 特别对政府部门及官员的腐败；都在说：反腐亡党，不反腐亡国。 在这个境况下，放弃一些一些经济发展，对政府腐败，和官商勾结下手。 这近官场风气好转多了，那种没有节制腐败和官商勾结得到限制。 社会风气好了许多。
是的，当时中国人都骂共产党贪污。习近平搞反贪腐，确实得到很多老百姓的赞赏。
我倒觉得陆克文非常厉害, 用一套近乎说了等于没说的言语来强化一般西方人对中国的惯性认知来巩固陆克文自己这一层次《具有汉学家身份的政客》的不可替代性。。。
没有必要攻击陆克文，他是政客他要对他的政党负责，他要对他的人设负责，更要对他的金主负责，就是因为陆克文们的存在西方才猜不透中国
這一點正正就是漂亮國喜歡的人選，會懂中文，所謂漢學家，也曾擔任過國家元首，說一些似是而非的繆論，聽到一片西方人士一楞一楞的信以為真，比漂亮國自己講一千遍更有效
它只是另一个"章家蹲"😂
讓他主人繼續麻痺
确实是这样，但是作为政治决策者和建议者，这种建议的后果是灾难性的。它会一步一步加深欧美决策者的信息茧房，让他们强化对中国处境的幻想。这就像是二战时期隆美尔接收到的那些迎合他战略预想的假情报，或者62年印度文官集团接收到的关于中国军队的假消息一样，让他们在错误的认知里越陷越深而无法进行调整，最后自我毁灭。国内的专家学者千万要引以为戒。
还是有聪明人，英雄所见类同。
看了半天只有你，留个评论。
Be able to speak Chinese not necessarily understood Chinese ru jia philosophy and was typical reflection on this so called China expert Kelvin Rud
I am an Overseas Chinese. From my limited understanding and based on my observations of China after Xi Jin Ping took over the reign and his utterances and performance, I am inclined to believe that Xi is a benevolent, sincere, intelligent and courageous leader. Influenced by his understanding and belief in the Confucian and Buddhist teachings, Xi genuinely has the welfare of the Chinese populace, the Chinese nation and the entire humankind in a righteous, sustainable, far-sighted, and a win-win manner in accordance of the universal truth, goodness, and beauty. On top of all these, he also has the wisdom, courage, patience, and skill to ride the storms and steer the mother vessel to a peaceful, harmonious, and safe destination. I would rate him a an near-perfect sagely ruler, worthy of the respect and support of all peace-loving people of the world .
我是一名海外华人。以我有限的了解，以及对习近平执政后的中国社会的观察，以及他的言行，我由衷相信习近平主席是一位仁慈、真诚、智慧和勇敢的领导人。受儒家和佛家思想的影响，习近平真正以正义、可持续、长远和共赢的方式，按照宇宙真善美的原则，为中国人民、中华民族和全人类谋福利。除此之外，他还有智慧、勇气、耐心和技巧，能够驾驭风浪，带领这艘诺亚方舟驶向和平、幸福与安全的目的地。我认为他是一位近乎完美的圣人领袖，值得全世界爱好和平的人拥护与支持。
我接触的国内中产，对习评价不高，但我真心认为，20年后再来评价，习可以排在小平同志之后。
His entire life epitomized the ruthless opportunism of the Anglo-Saxon Puritan mindset. His understanding and interpretation of China were akin to a pack of wolves strategizing an ambush. From his perspective, the civilized and gentle characteristics of China, known for its etiquette, were not worth sharing or promoting. Instead, his aim was more about eradicating it, targeting the Eastern people with yellow skin who were most resistant to submission. It is truly tragic.
他和很多西方人一样，也不懂中国。其实中国共产党的内核，依旧是传统的中国文化主导，不是所谓的马克思主义。 当下的中国，是从3000多年华夏文明中生长出来的，马克思列宁主义的某方面，无非是和传统的中国文化比较有相似性而已，于是陆克文就给贴一个马克思列宁主义标签。其实不然，中国执政党的内核精髓，是“儒家思想”，是“士大夫精神”，是”耕者有其田“，是”大同世界“，是“家国天下”，是“学而优则仕”。要懂中国执政党，一定要把当下的中国放在她3000多年的历史长河中观察。她是一个继往开来的国家管理者。所以，要懂她，就要先懂秦汉武，要懂唐、宋、元、明、清。中国和美国和澳大利亚这些年轻的国家是不一样的，中国的文化基因是和西方国家特别是年轻的美国、澳大利亚不一样的。
现在的执政党，是一个继往开来的国家管理者。经常传承和发展过去的管理经验，扬长避短，吐故纳新。 比如“一国两制”，好像是现在中国新型的管理模式，其实不然也，清朝就实行的“一国两制”，当初清朝的帝王在北京紫禁城和承德的避暑山庄，分别有两个办公地点，在紫禁城，主要处理内地18省的事务，在承德避暑山庄，主要处理西藏、新疆、蒙古的事务，处理的内地18省的政策和处理的西藏、新疆、蒙古的政策，是有很大的不一样的。
墨家的兼爱比共产主义还更理想化，道家的天之道就是造反有理，所以，后来农民起义都举替天行道的大旗，当然了，还有儒家的理想大同，孔子也不是贵族，儒家本来是平民，所以向往大同，只不过有一部分儒家成了忠君的管家，结果就是儒家不再向往大同了
建议看看儒家的礼记里的《礼运大同篇》，据说还是孔子写的
因为，很多人不读儒家经典，他们纠结共产主义是西方的，事实是恰恰相反，马克思的共产主义就是山寨孔子的大同
《礼运大同篇》具体的描述大同，从年轻力壮到男女老少等等一一列举，比如，青壮年干什么，女人小孩有什么，老弱病残鳏寡孤独得到什么，就是具体描述各尽所能按需分配，特别了不起的是还说了珍惜资源浪费可耻，这恰恰是有些人自以为聪明挑社会主义的毛病，耕者有其田也不是满足一些人拥有万亩良田的欲望，那不可能实现，按需分配是按照需要，按照生存的需要，不是按照欲望的需要
大同就是各尽所能按需分配，只不过大同是用年轻力壮老弱病残男女老少鳏寡孤独等等具体方式表达，马克思的共产主义是用一般方式各尽所能按需分配表达，所以，马克思的共产主义就是山寨的儒家大同，总而言之，大同和共产主义都是理想，无神论者的理想，有神论者的理想在天堂，五花八门，不同宗教的天堂不一样，无神论者的理想在地上，除了大同没别的，共产主义只是大同的山寨或翻译
下面是《礼运大同篇》的原文：
大道之行也，天下为公。选贤与能，讲信修睦，故人不独亲其亲，不独子其子，使老有所终，壮有所用，幼有所长，鳏寡孤独废疾者皆有所养，男有分，女有归。货恶其弃于地也，不必藏于己；力恶其不出于身也，不必为己。是故谋闭而不兴，盗窃乱贼而不作，故外户而不闭，是谓大同。
@@一个说话大声的中国人 马克思和中国文化结合,中国唯物主义,兼收并蓄,能抓老鼠就是好猫,只要先进的.,中国国人吸收能力太强,这就是同化
@@qssqddqqwdwqdqdsDSda 马克思对中国文化的价值是解放全人类，或中国文化的国际化，因为中国传统文化不关心外国的人和事，相比之下，基督徒全世界传教
拜託，馬克思共產黨理論是跟基於歐洲落後文化中（相對傳統中國）近代工業革命所演生敝端-資本主義，而出生的。跟傳統3000年前大同世界理想，跟本無關!!!
@@chawenwang 拜託nmb
写繁体字的脑子里都是鸦片，你没时间概念，你要知道谁先来谁后到
先来是原创，先来影响后到，后到无法证明自己没听说过先来
3000年前大同世界理想在中国延续发展3000年，不可避免的影响全世界，包括共产主义
刘邦出生的故事你知道吗？
刘邦先来，汉朝跟罗马的联系交流有记载，基督后到，差不多200年以后
所以，基督出生的故事就是山寨刘邦出生的故事，叫小偷也行
Looks like not even a single comment in Chinese agrees. That's the problem- Western thinks they know China, but they don’t! 😅
作为一个生活在中国大陆的公民，我有认真倾听陆克文的论述，认同他的大部分观点，我认为他的观察在很大程度上是客观的。。顺便一体，我和老陆最大的分歧就是，我不认为中国有称霸世界，左右世界乃至亚洲太平洋地区的可能，即便中国经济规模成为世界第一，也没有能力做到这一点，因为世界的格局，美国的强大，全世界对西方治理体系的文化认同，都注定中国只能成为一个有影响力的国家而永远不可能成为世界的主宰
Hi Kevin, you know now which is the worst nation in the world to take a backward step on Human Rights. Israel or USA?
并列第一
@@billychen2103回答正确!👍🍻😂
看了这个评论区太欣慰了，清醒人这么多。
信仰央格鲁那套，始终想让中国人给欧美头部企业打工，这种思想该结束了。强大的祖国人民，是不会一直被压迫的。加油，中国🇨🇳
Throwing a few Chinese phrases here n there does not make him a China expert or read Xi Jin ping well. Kishore, Professor Wolff and others seem to understand China more.
True, Kishore and Cyrus Janssen is more knowledgeable in Chinese matter.
他真的是一知半解，表演型人格的政客，听他讲话真的浪费时间
He should focus more on communicating with kangaroos and koala!!!
Wasting time, however I watched twice just want to make sure every single point of his is BS, quite disappointed in his talk this time, change my opinion on him
@@jjhguo6482你没必要为他感到失望，这个陆克文就是住在澳洲的另一个"脏(章)家蹲"而已没什么了不起的，他今天所说的话只会成为打脸自己的大笑话!😂
我也住在澳洲， 以前大选， 我还选了他， 当时认为他是公平公正的政治人物， 他只是政客而已😢
确实符合表演型人格的特质，整个人的神态动作就看上去不自然，抽离。
聽了16:40， 我想「陸」只看到表面現象的事實， 運用自己的知識與想像， 闡述自己以狹隘央格魯族類， 膨脹成世界所有人類後 ，衍生出來答案。 「完全」沒有中國政權演進文化，為政者如何面對「民心所向」的統治所面對的「主題」之一， 搞不清楚「王道」統治者的「儒學」與」「法治」的觀點， 歷史絲路鏡像一帶一路對策下的「大中國」與「大政治家-唐朝的「太宗」李世民為榜樣的志業！ 目前已經可以講「菁英」政治團的上古「禪讓政治」傳承的演續， 知道什麼事是「穩定」世界的政經軍事科技生活的綜合力量！ 「中國」的長城， 是來禦敵不是侵略， 鄭和船隊下西洋， 也只是宣揚國威， 而非「西方」、 尤其是「英格魯」族的擄掠， 盤站所有資源與統治所侵略的國度！ 說穿了， 世界給「央格魯」族150年， 只有其一族及相關猶太人士周圍組織國家得到好處， 有多少人還在落後國度， 正如非洲飢餓年代延續過去多少年？ 自己好意思說嗎？中國崛起， 不會是壞事， 至少「第三世界」可以從落後中解脫換骨！ 人們可以被更「公平」對待！
為什麼西方人這麼喜歡指責別人？（自己的過去及現在狀況更糟！！）
你會在演講時 說自己如呵壞 不要和我來往嗎?
一個老頭 能做到這樣不容易了 況且他的分析還是有可聽性
因为不指责别人，就得面对自己的问题。
比烂
Human rights? Could you please enlighten us on what happened to those imprisoned in Guantanamo bay?
还有巴勒斯坦的加沙地区的上百万平民!
In practice, human right in the US divides into many levels depending on the races:
1/White Caucasian.
2/Black
3/Hispanic
4/illegal immigrant
5/Asian (within this group: Japanese, Indian, Filipinos, Korean, Vietnamese, ... and Chinese )
The Chinese was the last because, in the US history, Chinese was considered as sub-human species , merely
provide cheap labor for the railroad, and after that only survive on either laundry and cheap Chinese food services.
The European and Japanese were looking down on Chinese because of the nature of Chinese never want to be aggressive or to fight only want to make money. Throughout its history, even with its huge population, it let Mongolian and Manchurian invaded and ruled. Even on the golden time of China dynasties, instead of crushing its much weaker neighbors, it selected to build a defensive wall, now called the Great Wall. Chinese suffered very frequently with big starvation in which ten of millions people died. Under Mao, there was no exception, yet China never want to touch its neighbors like Thailand, Malaysia to secure food (unlike Japanese to invade the whole Asia to secure the needed material by forces, even before the WWII ).
陸克文最大的問題就是缺乏對西方文化反思的能力。他一廂情愿的以為西方文化就是標桿，以至于他對中國的看法偏頗了。資本主義的問題就是不能解決人性自私所帶來的後果。這就是習近平要改革的。另外就是昂撒人喜歡駕馭他人的習性必須有效的制止。
rudd's first surprise says it all - he has never understood china & chinese. he might have learned the language but he has never taken off his anglo glasses
当我发布了自己所见所闻所体会而写的言论后，我才开始看各界的评论，看了一些评论后 我微笑了 我欢心了 我安心了
马来西亚华人笔🤗中国心
你一个马来西亚华人，也配有中国心，你不要想太多。
@taowang-bj3xt 华人有中国心有啥问题呢😊
Do you really understand China? Understanding is not the same as being able to speak the local language. Many people can speak English, but it does not mean that they understand the United Kingdom and the United States...
You spent forty years researching almost ten fallacies! And from time to time, you humorously and elegantly immerse yourself in them. You are not a lion; just because you often hear a lion's roar, you think you understand lions. In reality, you have always been a kangaroo. Just do your own thing. There's no need to spend so much time researching some really impractical, outdated issues. The world is constantly changing, and keeping up with the times is something every person, every country, and every leader must face. Show more understanding, respect, and tolerance, and your expression will not be so heavy. Thank you.
Although you can express yourself in Chinese, try to use less Chinese when speaking in English. However, I suggest that you deeply study Chinese traditional culture, especially Chinese poetry. In that field, you might find it helps you break out of Xi Jinping's way of thinking. Clearly, your so-called rational thinking research has been influenced by Xi Jinping for too long. There's an old Chinese saying: "The onlooker sees more clearly than the player." When you look at Xi Jinping, others are also observing you. Using a fixed Western mindset cannot adequately interpret China's issues.
Given that you spent forty minutes promoting the ideas in your book, I must commend you for your persistence. Keep it up, and make good use of your time to do something meaningful!
Nah. This so called China " expert" is just another clone of all the other similarly western PhDeed " experts" ricocheting and echoing the same old narratives and " findings". No new insights nor in depth understanding of subtle nuances in civilizational and cultural differences. Just because he speaks Mandarin slightly better than the next white guy, he thinks he's an " expert". His condescending tone and delusional sense of
" superiority" and perspectives on keeping China "where it should be" ie compliant and submissive to western hegemony and it's so called " rules based order" is typically Colonialistic and downright racist.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. I'm not a betting person but if I were, I'd put my money on China continuing to lift the standard of living and quality of life for its peoples for many years to come whilst the collective West will correspondingly continue to decline with shorter life expectancy, increasing poverty and homelessness, rapid rise in crime and lawlessness etc etc.
As the 90% of the global majority is noticing and waking up to the changing world order observed - China builds whilst the collective West ably led by the terrorist rogue state Banana Republic of America (BRA), DESTROYS !!!
以前只听说有个章家蹲，tmd 现在突然冒出"章家蹲们"了😂
观知求真
四十年探旧迷思
耳闻狮吼心自疑。
非狮为跃非狮者，
循规蹈矩何足论。
时移世易思维新，
尊重包容心常清。
古诗词中见真谛，
破除固执识广精。
观者清晰超智者，
他人观你自明晰。
探求真知勿沉迷，
意义深远志长存。
How China sees the world should ask the Chinese leaders and academians or refer to the Chinese history. Why ask an Anglo-American? I can still remember him constantly asking when is China going to become like one of them
That’s like asking a company about themselves; they will only present their products in the best light
@@AcidRooster Then at most outsiders can only speculate how China sees the world
光開口說起什麼馬克思列寧主義、意識形態就已經知道他不行
中國和習近平不是認為蘇聯失敗是因為在意識形態不夠堅定
而是因為知道真正原因蘇聯被美國忽悠了往錯誤方向改革
那请问为啥要改革？还不是因为原来的不好么，怎么不见美英搞改革啊~
空话连篇😂😂😂！浪费我17分钟
同意！
我看了两条评论，就没有点播放键，所以一秒都没浪费，你为什么要坚持17分钟？
@@zircon6566 愚蠢呗😂
經常留意新聞的，看到是這貨根本就不會按播放鍵
凱文從來不了解中國。他是個兩面三刀的機會主義者。他對中國的態度非常敵視，但他卻假裝對中國很公平、很了解。他不是一個值得信任的人。
這些人如果想了解中國，就到中國去問中國的領導人。為什麼要問像凱文這樣的人？浪費時間。
這些所謂的中國專家對中國和中華文明所知甚少。
研究了这么多的政策文件，竟然说这样的话，还想中国应该继续2亿件衣服换一架飞机，不配拥有高新技术。这是多么封闭的思想呀。😂
Now I understand why kevin Rudd is not liked in neither sides. Presumptious and in essence, arrogant(whilst pretending to be humble)
果真是他自己的認知😅
澳洲的章家蹲!😂
想懂中国只看表现是不够的，起码要把中国的历史全部研究一遍，把古老与现代的政治与哲学结合在一起再看现在的中国。
他還是盎薩一族的心態，他們當年又如何對待他們自己的原住民與殖民地之資源掠奪呢？
绝对讚同，他是昂薩族人，即使会中文，也不代表他懂中华文化，了解中国，非我族類其心也異，更 何况他是一位政治人物，在政客的心中，只有自我利益價值观，那懂得社会有机统一体.
所有什麼普世價值的國家，G7個個在自己國家選民支持率新低。他們從來不檢討自己國家的失敗原因，心裡永遠只覺得他們可以天天工作數小時，放功可以大魚大肉，而中國非洲南美那些國家你們晚餐只能吃個面包是正常的事，當他們看見你們也能大魚大肉時就是世界被外星人入侵一样緊張，從不去了解人們國家的人民天天工作十多小時，什麼辛苦工作也去拼的時候，美國人民在做什麼，單是波音就明白他們對工作,公眾安全的不負責任就知这國家冇前途，还四處找借口解釋。中國今天所做的事都得到全球大部份人認同，只有在之前享受慣高尚生活而現在不能再擁有此權利的國家大大声說不能。世界的不公平如今开始平衡，願意不願意已經不再由西方話事，不認同使躲於一角繼續扮演世界一哥，沒有一哥世界行得更暢順。所謂民主每幾年又改一個领導人，將所有政策也改變，世界就是这样被阻慢進步，你看美國連一條高鐵也沒有，火箭更加已上不了太空，你不是想說这是進步。
咱從過去被洗腦完全接受西方觀點，到大陸後逐漸回省觀察。聽到此視頻，對以往的陸克文先生很失望；例如從一開始的敘述【大陸在習近平的領導下，中國實際上已經相當深刻地改變中國内部的增長模式，並使更具國家主義色彩，對私營部門不太友好，因此，導致中國經濟增長迅速放緩】，就存在很多缺陷。簡單的提一點異見【如果這些年美國不帶著西方小弟圍堵醜化中國，中國成長持續增長】，就對視頻説法起很多提問；去觀看一些留言也有。所以陸先生如是，真如其言，浪費四十年的光陰。大陸領導人早十年前已看出世界局勢做出修正反應，而歐美人士，尤其是美國，對自己抛棄霸權建立的國際架構越發雙標而不知反省，就不多説了....
正确时间是7年前提出百年未有之大变局
真正理解中国，陆克文得跳出他的央格鲁撒克逊思维。中国之所以加强国家对资本的监管是为了避免重犯英国人和美国人的错误：国家成了受资本控制为特殊利益谋利的工具。经过几十年的发展中国出现了不少有钱人。如果政府不加强对他们的监管，广大人民的利益将会得不到保障。中国的目标是实现共同富裕。
沒錯，放任資本無止盡地自由自在，最後就是出現韓國三星。
China has never had the appetite to rule the world instead China has had helping many nations improve their economy and build schools to education children and adults to improve their life to depart from proverty....
Really hope you can go to Xinjiang and see for yourself, and not be fooled by wrong reports, so that you can understand that those inhumane events did not actually happen in Xinjiang...
老陆也不容易。用英语让全英语国家的人讨厌，用中文让主流讲中文的人讨厌。党内党内讨厌，党外党外愤怒。。。人才。
背靠背当外来和尚，可是经念的不是歪的问题，是根本就不通、不懂🤣
又想左右逢源，又想表演特立独行，本一知半解、自以为是，却想表现得专家模样，就是这个结果了。
老陆就是一个普通人，当总理时也不要求大家统一思想，下台后也不会迎合别人。。。是不是觉得不可理解?
Very disappointing, especially the part about Xinjiang, so pathetic. Australia has no wise politician, maybe it's a good thing.
中国的问题第一是方向，第二是核心，第三是安全，第四是制度。方向就是走向现代化，核心就是科学，一切都要围绕科技为核心，安全是军事，军事必须强大才能安全，制度是一定要解决叹服特权和法治不章的问题。可以说现在第一，第二和第四解决的都不好，第三也一般，但是留给中国目前这个政权的时间越来越少了，因为贪腐特权和法治问题越来越严重，如果经济没有大的起色，中国这个政权很可能在三十年内崩溃。
He needs to protect his position as the Ambassador in US
I kind of agree somewhat
There were a group of smart blind persons having the opportunity to touch an elephant. Each of them proudly and accurately described the parts that they touched...
陆克文对中国的了解只有皮毛，枉费了他学了中文。
他学的那点中文看三国应该是看不懂的。
政治见解都还不如一个出租车司机
西人怎可能了解中國人的精髓。
墨家的兼爱比共产主义还更理想化，道家的天之道就是造反有理，所以，后来农民起义都举替天行道的大旗，当然了，还有儒家的理想大同，孔子也不是贵族，儒家本来是平民，所以向往大同，只不过有一部分儒家成了忠君的管家，结果就是儒家不再向往大同了
建议看看儒家的礼记里的《礼运大同篇》，据说还是孔子写的
因为，很多人不读儒家经典，他们纠结共产主义是西方的，事实是恰恰相反，马克思的共产主义就是山寨孔子的大同
《礼运大同篇》具体的描述大同，从年轻力壮到男女老少等等一一列举，比如，青壮年干什么，女人小孩有什么，老弱病残鳏寡孤独得到什么，就是具体描述各尽所能按需分配，特别了不起的是还说了珍惜资源浪费可耻，这恰恰是有些人自以为聪明挑社会主义的毛病，耕者有其田也不是满足一些人拥有万亩良田的欲望，那不可能实现，按需分配是按照需要，按照生存的需要，不是按照欲望的需要
大同就是各尽所能按需分配，只不过大同是用年轻力壮老弱病残男女老少鳏寡孤独等等具体方式表达，马克思的共产主义是用一般方式各尽所能按需分配表达，所以，马克思的共产主义就是山寨的儒家大同，总而言之，大同和共产主义都是理想，无神论者的理想，有神论者的理想在天堂，五花八门，不同宗教的天堂不一样，无神论者的理想在地上，除了大同没别的，共产主义只是大同的山寨或翻译
下面是《礼运大同篇》的原文：
大道之行也，天下为公。选贤与能，讲信修睦，故人不独亲其亲，不独子其子，使老有所终，壮有所用，幼有所长，鳏寡孤独废疾者皆有所养，男有分，女有归。货恶其弃于地也，不必藏于己；力恶其不出于身也，不必为己。是故谋闭而不兴，盗窃乱贼而不作，故外户而不闭，是谓大同。
@@一个说话大声的中国人😂孔子怎么就不算贵族了，好好读读史记去
Well done interview. I wish more people could view this video.
呢条粉肠观点，只有美帝言论财是世界唯一！！！
I lost interest when he said "human rights". For all Western scholars out there, don't even mention human rights for at least a decade unless you had had an opinion on Gaza's sufferings. Enough said.
哈哈😂 數字會說話！印度在1947年脫英獨立 成為全球最大的民主國家 中華人民共和國在1949年建國 成為全球最大的中央集權的社會主義國家， 兩國人口相當 各自努力70餘年 ，現在的成果是 中國的GDP17.7兆 印度GDP3.5兆 是中國的1/5. 在太空科技 衞星導航 軍備自製 基礎建設 高鉄工程的鋪設 電動車/電池的發展，太陽版的製造等 遠遠超越 印度！孰優劣？不辨自明！ 美國在1776年建國至今248年 走到全球第一。中國自1949建國至今75年 只花了美國 75/248=30%的時間 就超過歐洲 趕美。走到全球第二大經濟體 這種速度怎麼不令西方國家 心驚！
补充一点，印度避免了全部所有每一个毛主席的错误，也就是是毛主席的所有全部错误，大跃进，文革，等等等等，印度一个都没犯，所以，想想吧，所谓毛主席的错误到底是错误还是良药苦口
印度的问题跟民主无关, 他一直是散装的国家, 语言都没有统一的, 很多邦之间都不能互相联通. 还有大印度教和穆斯林的不能改变的问题.
@@黄老五-w6f其实很多国家发展不起来或慢就是宗教问题😂，中国人更多的是把宗教，神，当做一种寄托而不是盲目的信奉。这也算是从共产主义里学来的优点😂
共產世界第一會玩馬列批鬥的蘇聯師傅史達林教中國徒弟毛玩馬列遊戲，史過世之後，毛要當共產世界的第一就和蘇聯鬧翻打仗（珍寶島），對內馬列文革將中國弄成生靈塗炭。
毛過世後，鄧清洗4人幫，轉向資本世界第一的美國求救。
資本世界第一會商業經營管理的美國師傅教徒弟，給他機會加入WTO 全球資本市場，將原本窮途潦倒徒弟教成世界第二之後，徒弟就…又再次展露本性。
中國人的劣根性….換湯不換藥
中國人根本不是純正的共產主義或資本主義….而是精緻利己主義罷了。
原来民主不是灵丹妙药包治百病啊
陆克文对中国一知半解又自以为是.
This guy is talking rubbish! 😅
很明顯他並不懂中國，而且盎格魯撒克遜只是固有的套路化的研究，中國將會有更多的出乎他們意料的成就展現出來，等他們幡然醒悟才會理解這樣的想法是多麼的愚蠢。當然，這更多是受制於西方一貫的輿論戰習慣，每一任中國的領導者，他們都會冠以獨裁者的頭銜來污名化，無論是之前的江澤民、胡錦滔，然後再以這個同心圓來演進出另外10個擴展的同心圓，軍事、經濟、政治、政黨，社會管理等等，這就是一套公式，陸克文不過是實施輿論污名化的執行者之一而已。
Just because he can speak Mandarin does not necessarily make him an expert or even knowledgeable about China.
每个人的信仰不同，价值观的不同，对中国都会有不同的看法。在强盗的眼里你的军事强大就是为了抢掠做准备，在爱好和平的人眼里就是为了维护和平
唉！非我族類，學會中文已經難學了，還要他了解中華文明，學了40年都不得要領，真是難為他了！
人家讲现在的中国，你扯到中华文明，听这个英语，看这个字幕，难为你了
你也一样会中文但是看不懂题主说的中文😂@@韧性
@@xingshizhang5933 不要不懂装懂，这是很累人的，替你着急
🤭簡直就是個人笑話(訪問）。
很有深度啊
凯文除了学习中文，没有其它专业，所以在工党的位子重來没有坐稳，在党内既不是左翼又不是右翼，這是工党唯一的总理是這样的。还好現在是工党执政，所以混了一个澳洲外交部門最好的一个肥差：駐美大使！可怜啊！
当年陆克文执政后，楞是把澳洲的财政盈余折腾成财政赤字。卸任后他还想谋取联合国秘书长的职位呢，美澳等一众政商领袖都出钱出力，结果黄了。😂
中国人的思维总是这么奇葩。你都说是肥缺了 还怎么可怜呢 搞笑了
墙国的哪个总理，部长（包括副的）下台后会去外国当大使？还看不出差异吗？你当总理下台后会去吗？
他以中国通闻名，对中国确实下了苦功去研究，最后却派到美国当大使，是不是没有充分发挥他的特长？这是可怜可惜之处，而美国和澳大利亚的关系绝对是澳大利亚的核心，这个大使位置确实是好位置。从他的思路来看，对中国看得比较浅，一来中国并不只有习主席一个，二来中国政策调整的重要原因绝对不能忽略美国及其盟友的围追堵截。这一点不提显得不够客观，不够专业。
中国正在转型，和美国的差距在缩小，在中美脱钩的背景下，以后，中国更多的产业进入高端，在全球和美国全面竞争，在美国已经全面禁止美国技术的背景下，如果中国还像新能源，华为这样不断突破，总不能说还是依赖美国吧？到时候中国通们又该如何圆？@@zjc5671
有一个理论，当西方觉得你做的不对，那么请坚持下去，说明你做对了，引起了所有人的担心。如果赞扬你，说明在鼓吹你，这时候要反思是不是自己做错了什么。
还是马凯硕，理解中国
陸克文太膚淺了！！！
他應該好好看留言區的言論！
對中國人權方面的批評，基本建立在謠言的基礎上。僅認可他其中的一句：對私營企業降低了包容。
可見你對中國的政策也是不了解. 中國希望是要"有序發展",穩才是第一,寧願慢一點,所以不是包容降低,而是監管增加. 其實中國對私企的監管跟美國比還差得很遠. 這個就跟中國國安法一樣,中國只是新出國安法,好像中國國安法很嚴格. 但其實美國國安法比中國嚴多了. 你看最近的地產業出事,就是因為以前根本沒監管,一出事,誰倒楣? 有錢人把錢都賺走,然後出事後,政府拿全民的錢出來幫忙收爛攤,這種事你可以接受?
 關鍵在對私企和國企的包容度，又或者政策許可並不相同，包括融資渠道、融資成本等等。
陸克文不是變了，就是起心動念就是如此，明顯是欲蓋彌彰，懂軍事的人都知道，防止朝鮮不管是導彈還是核彈，基本不須部署薩德系統，愛國者反導就可勾到，南韓與朝解根本只隔一條38 線，薩德可偵測到二、三千公里距離，早就別有用心，可能得查查，陸的智庫是否有大國資金在裡面資助而不得不為人口舌！
幸好听了4分钟后，赶忙瞅了眼评论区，再听属实浪费时间
股市某种程度上不就是资本家割韭菜的场所吗？任由发展贫富差距必然无限扩大
Think about US citizens have to choose president from 2 oooooooder guys. It is really a jooooke.
他不講西方自己拋棄了全球化😂
Kevin Rudd作為一個前澳洲總理，佢對中國嘅了解已經相當唔錯，喺西方精英被公認係一位中國通，佢正在給予西方世界點樣對付中國嘅有用點子,不可掉以輕心！😊
You are an Chinese expert as well as Westerner's scammers? you ideology are based on West and not based on East culture. You still have a long way to go. China needs not have to behave that way but all these methodology are from the west. Understand , Please spend time taking care of Australia interest first before lecture others.
谢谢精彩深入的分享。
2:33 中國內部增長模式改變，陸克文看到的是國家主義，也就是原來的較自主的市場改開，有更多國家及國家隊的角色。
的確，國進民退是有的，房地產，教培等不符合中央產業經濟主軸的沒被容忍，消費互聯网也受人口及收入抑制。
就大家看到的，這是不是大陸人民感受的經濟變化？
If this guy Rudd knew what he was doing, he would still be Prime Minister of Australia. And if Xi made the same kind of career moves, Xi would have found himself appointed Ambassador also.
很放心，有他这样的专家是西方之福哈哈哈
As a Chinese in domestic, i agree with every word he said
一位在美国做大使的政治人物也必须要说一些让美国人民听着比较舒顺的话语！😂😂
在我看來，共產主義社會主義資本主義在中國，應該都是拿來參考，鄧小平的摸著石頭過河最有道理，因為任何主義都遠遠沒有完善，必須慢慢演進，慢慢形成一種中國自己的有效想法，西方反華勢力往往故意把中國說成是純粹共產主義，因為他們知道長年的宣傳，共產主義已經形成很多人害怕並反對的甚至可怕的主義，他們是完全不提所謂有中國特色的社會主義這種說法，中國應該強調自己是中國主義，共產主義這種外來主義只是一種參考，是時候中國該有自己的想法自己的主義
为什么战狼外交？美国等一直想着分裂中国，经济制裁，支持台独菲律宾等，难道中国就只能任人宰割？ 虽然我不喜欢共产党很多方面，但是对于这个真霸权主义假专家感到很恶心，一个国家的外交政策也是基于国际形势，美国带着他们的小弟们一直想办法打压别人，难道就不容许别人反抗了？ 所以这就是一个吃人的世界，谁拳头大听谁的。
Ask yourself a very simple question: " does any one of your friends knows you in and out, deep down inside who you really are and what appeared to be predictable WILL become what he assumes?" Don't waste your time in your assumptions when " ASSUME " has been equated to " making an ASS out of U and ME " Good luck, embassador
應該可以AＩ來分各國領導人的思維模式及推測他們的政策走向！
很少有國際場合跟外國學者分析同樣是儒家文化跟黃皮膚，說相同語言，臺灣的民主制度跟中國共產主義，那個才是帶給人民幸福跟富有。
陸克文對中國的理解非常深入。這十個圈的確就是習近平的世界觀。也解釋了中國的轉變。總加速師這稱號不是白封的。陸克文認為日本對待中國的方式是最好的，的確。日本不太跟中國吵架。但很有效的經營印太各國，形成聯盟。目前第三世界國家和歐盟，都提高中國關稅，有效的幫助了習近平的共同富裕，讓中國的有錢人變窮。這也幫助中國減少了貧富差距，還幫習近平鞏固了黨中央。中國人更相信黨了，更相信有外國勢力對中國不利。中國人更願意犧牲自己的自由來爭取官員黨員和國家的自己。這是好事。
Interestingly, Kevin did not run the Australian economic well he is was PM, making him one of the short live PM in history. Here he is trying to tell China how to run its economy. He uses his fluent in Chinese to show that he knows China. In his point of view it is better for China to do nothing.
那只是他的想法，不一定准確
陆克文果然是中国通，对中国了解果然有深度，陆克文说的十个圈，是非常准确的。
What a load of crap!
Do not buy his book.
@@ponyoa9150它的书名不会是"中国经济崩溃论"吧?😂
陸克文出版的書將步上章家敦那本書相同的路
在往後二十年變成世人的笑柄
希望陸克文到時候不要羞愧到發瘋才好
讲的真好❤
卢克文这几个同心圆总结的不错
文化不同，他理解不了中国文化，或者说理解的太浅了。 从毛泽东到习近平，每个core都完成了不错的历史任务, 不做比较。就习近平来说，他努力推动扶贫，缩小贫富差距。不靠大型国企的纳税，难道靠天天想着避税的私企? 不是说私企不好，私企有私企的优势，但国企有国企的优势。中国私企有良心的少之又少。扶贫资金需要国企做后盾。 扶贫 不仅仅是那100多个贫困县，生活在大城市的老百姓也是受益的。我们的公共交通价格低廉且节能，我们的医保政策越来越合理 越来越好，老百姓的后顾之忧少了。扶贫有巨大的社会效益，也有巨大的经济效益，扶贫也让内部市场更广阔。 曾经作为一个大国的总理，你陆克文既不会算社会账，也不会算经济账，丢不丢脸？！当然了，跟西方其它领导人比，他还算不错的了，可笑的西方民主制度。
西方的thinking logic只考虑私有经济和个人利益，但是作为中华民族和中国来说……这个他们永远理解不了的…
This video seems to have been recorded before 2022.
Geopolitics has changed since then especially with BRICS and own-currency trades.
I am not convinced that suppressing the business elites in a reflection of Circle 3 (common prosperity) is in order to keep Circle 1 intact (CPC always in power).
哈哈哈！ 子民們笑陸克文不了解中國文化，陸克文笑子民們不了解自己的統治者！
對牛彈琴🤣🤣
he is not friend with Chinese people.....definiatly not to CCP
西方人一面說中國政府大力資助私人企業製造芯片、電動車、光伏板、鋁生產、鋼生產，在世界市場做成不公，另一方面卻說中國政府壓制私人企業。
民企太強人，會影響他們的政權，這是答案。他們的政權，這是答案。