Tribute for Monkey D luffy fans, the best character of the One Piece Anime. Used video: One Piece episode :278,396,474,733,1015 Owner of used videos is FUNImation.
One under rated moment is when he pulls Katakuri into mirror world and doesnt hesitate to smash the mirror cutting himself off from the only way back onto his ship at the moment and making sure no matter what happens his crew is safe .
Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit! Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@SilentStone13 Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit! Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@1alopezpr Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit! Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@jeremysorejian He wants freedom you dumbass, you could be next on his punching bag list, be careful, cuz HE GON' BE KING OF THE PIRATESSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Somebody mentioned this under a Crunchyroll video: the first one isn't just Luffy being petty and destroying the WG flag just to piss them off. In drum island he showed that he _fully_ understands what it means to attack someone's flag. It means you are attacking everything they stand for. He did that knowing _exactly_ what would happen next.
It wasn't petty. He destroyed the WG flag because Robin was willing to sacrifice her safety for the crew because her enemy was the world government. Luffy ordering to destroy the WG flag was a message to Robin. That he'll take on the WG for his crew mates so much so that he made them his enemy with the destruction of the flag. Because the consequence of destroying it means an act of war against the WG
It's even deeper then that. At that moment Luffy fully believed Sabo was killed by "the world". I don't think he fully knew what it meant but as his journey progresses he seems to witness what "the world" is. It's in Robin being persecuted. It's in Hatchan getting shot. It's in Kemie being enslaved. It's in Ace being executed for a crime of being born. Luffy ordering the destruction of WG flag is his first step in standing against "the world" and it is accumulated in his answer to Kaido when Kaido asks him what sort of world he wants. Luffy wants "the world" to be free
There’s literally so many. I think that’s why there are so many one piece fans. There’s lots of fun and jokes and then you get moments of amazingness that make us all want to follow Luffy on his journey to king.
I like when on Fish Man Island right before they are about to fight Hordy's 100,000 fishman army, Luffy walks right in between Sanji and Zoro arguing about who is going to take out more enemies and proceeds to knockout 50,000 men with his conquerors haki.
The first moment is even more epic when you count luffy yelling to Robin saying she wants to live and she replies. The last one is even more epic when luffy punches kaido to the ground and says he will be the king of pirates.
I still think the Jet Gattling Luffy used at the end of his fight with Lucci was incredibly badass, both in animation, emotion, and impact. Love that scene.
@@superanimeniac he still didn't die when he pulled that shit either but instead the only good celestial dragon in the series who stepped into save her was executed instead
My favourite is the walk out onto the top of Onigashima and no hesitation walks up to Kaido and Big Mom. And he was serious the whole fight…until Nika ofc. And when he awakens Adv Conq and splits the sky against Kaido
Yeah, he is the type who doesn't give af, we may love any character in OP due to how Oda can make them badass with his fantastic creativity, but Luffy is the main protagonist for a reason, he is the best badass let's be honest, Luffy is a GOATed Anime protagonist.
why does no one talk about the don kreig fight when he has all those spikes on his arm and luffy punches him THROUGH the spikes anyways? i feel like that was the first instance where it was like “oh shit luffy’s badass and crazy”
that last one, looking like a real demon, ignoring kaito and big mom as if they aren't there... you can't be more badass. he does nothing, nothing at all. and looks completely badass.
i never realised but isnt luffy's outfit similar like he was in strong world when he beat shiki and is the first time we see his gear third go way over normal into giant territory , its always amazes me how oda is foreshadowing, that movie came out in 2009 only for a similar thing to play out a whole decade later
There's 3 moment that hit different . Water 7 , sabaody, and marine ford. Cz in this arc we can see different side of luffy. Since the begining luffy describe strong, confident, and etc. But on this 3 arc luffy need to dealing with his crew, facing the Conquense of his act, being weak, fragile and hopeless of losing his brother
That show how Oda is growing with One Piece together. Luffy declares war witg the gaverment almost evry chapter and never be hunted by the govorements, while Ace was executed after a battle with Blackbeard whonwas absolutly nothing this time. Even as a son if the Pirate King, his father is a legend like Garp for rhe goverment(old generation). The killing of Ace look too unreal basdd on the whole anime right now....
Nah, the anime doesn't even have 1/10th the epicness of the manga. Btw, best luffy moments are the celestial dragon punch in sabaody, and the 1-man-army waiting for sanji in whole cake island.
What ever you say the punch 👊 to celestial dragon remains most epic...none could see their eyes (celestials)and one pirate punch him lol after that borsalino shows and destroyed the crew.... remember the lvl of every epic bad ass moment... celestials are gods...none can touch the gods
You know after time skip and see so much race are in there, and see this scene i was just wondering if these three admiral are from long long leg race. 😂😂😂
Nami might die..... a d the staff of Zeus aka kinyin might be passed to luffy. Expelling anytime of image death cuz of luffy resistance... I really hate to see her go but the moneybking need his staff and he basically acts like the staff would...
The most satisfying was the last one when luffy ignored kaido and big mom. It clearly portrays his character where he places his friends above everything and it doesn't matter who is standing in front of him he is always ready to take them down. And this shows that he is king material
One under rated moment is when he pulls Katakuri into mirror world and doesnt hesitate to smash the mirror cutting himself off from the only way back onto his ship at the moment and making sure no matter what happens his crew is safe .
I second that
Epicness, and the final attack!
Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit!
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@SilentStone13 Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit!
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@1alopezpr Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit!
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
That punch to a celestial dragon
Most satisfying 😊
He is the definition of a kid that hasn’t Been beaten enough
@@jeremysorejianI’m sure he’s much older then you plus he’s not a kid he’s 19 he’s a adult
@@LK_scpriters first I'm older
Second I'm talking about he's acting like someone who's never been told no.
@@jeremysorejian what every I don’t need ur yapping
@@jeremysorejian He wants freedom you dumbass, you could be next on his punching bag list, be careful, cuz HE GON' BE KING OF THE PIRATESSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That celestial dragon dude got sent back to the manga 💀💀
LMAOOO
Somebody mentioned this under a Crunchyroll video: the first one isn't just Luffy being petty and destroying the WG flag just to piss them off. In drum island he showed that he _fully_ understands what it means to attack someone's flag. It means you are attacking everything they stand for.
He did that knowing _exactly_ what would happen next.
Facts !!!!
Luffy has probably the highest "in moment" battle/eq ...
Once he has a reason to fight he jus knows lol
It wasn't petty. He destroyed the WG flag because Robin was willing to sacrifice her safety for the crew because her enemy was the world government. Luffy ordering to destroy the WG flag was a message to Robin. That he'll take on the WG for his crew mates so much so that he made them his enemy with the destruction of the flag. Because the consequence of destroying it means an act of war against the WG
He also did it so that robin’s enemy became his enemy so she had no excuses to not return to the crew.
It's even deeper then that. At that moment Luffy fully believed Sabo was killed by "the world". I don't think he fully knew what it meant but as his journey progresses he seems to witness what "the world" is. It's in Robin being persecuted. It's in Hatchan getting shot. It's in Kemie being enslaved. It's in Ace being executed for a crime of being born.
Luffy ordering the destruction of WG flag is his first step in standing against "the world" and it is accumulated in his answer to Kaido when Kaido asks him what sort of world he wants.
Luffy wants "the world" to be free
Hachi apologizing for being shot was just sad on another level man
There’s literally so many. I think that’s why there are so many one piece fans. There’s lots of fun and jokes and then you get moments of amazingness that make us all want to follow Luffy on his journey to king.
I like when on Fish Man Island right before they are about to fight Hordy's 100,000 fishman army, Luffy walks right in between Sanji and Zoro arguing about who is going to take out more enemies and proceeds to knockout 50,000 men with his conquerors haki.
Yo r😢
I mean is it's right 😊❤
fr man
Luffy is only afraid of his grandpa 😂
Also Nami
He's also afraid of big mom
To be fair, it's a very reasonable fear
But when it comes to ace execution, he punches his grandpa on face
@@Doodhpeda that day he was controlled by a higher power
The first moment is even more epic when you count luffy yelling to Robin saying she wants to live and she replies.
The last one is even more epic when luffy punches kaido to the ground and says he will be the king of pirates.
4:06 Luffy so mad he used observation before knowing it
Luffy punching a celestial dragon is one of the most satisfying punch ever
I still think the Jet Gattling Luffy used at the end of his fight with Lucci was incredibly badass, both in animation, emotion, and impact. Love that scene.
You can’t tell me luffy not best mc. I’m not saying strongest but he has to many iconic moments
Luffy punched that celestial dragon so hard he died bro had some built up rage after seeing what he did to hatchi.
he didn't die. he pulls the same shit in the levelly arc with shirahoshi
This is why kids need to be punished
Imagine punch with haki 🥶
@@superanimeniac he still didn't die when he pulled that shit either but instead the only good celestial dragon in the series who stepped into save her was executed instead
@@theshiny_lotad4661 yup.
Because the CDs are cartoonishly evil
Can’t believe you left out the most bad ass moment which is right after the timeskip when he dodged the Pacifista lasers and they exploded behind him
good take but where to put it? this list is actually really good already tho
My favourite is the walk out onto the top of Onigashima and no hesitation walks up to Kaido and Big Mom. And he was serious the whole fight…until Nika ofc. And when he awakens Adv Conq and splits the sky against Kaido
If u are now in vegapank arc you are truly one piece fan ❤
Egghead* arc but yea we there 😁🔥
So many epic moments! Thanks Oda, Toei, and crew!
And thanks to the maker of this video for sharing!
The best moment of luffy when he enters marineford at front of three admiral.
Let's be honest all of Luffy s walk is badass and cold
Yeah, he is the type who doesn't give af, we may love any character in OP due to how Oda can make them badass with his fantastic creativity, but Luffy is the main protagonist for a reason, he is the best badass let's be honest, Luffy is a GOATed Anime protagonist.
bro did the worst cuts possible
🤣😂🤣
The scene with Kinnemon was the best for me
Episode no?
No matter how many times I watch this, the celestial dragon scene was way above every other scene
Yooo you forgot the moment with Bellamy, i think its one of the first bad ass moments
That punch made made me rethink 😂 being rude
Luffy turned that celestial dragon into an actual dragon judging by the distance he flew😂
that kinemon scene deadass makes me cry every single time
You *know* there was a childhood flashback during that Enies Lobby scene.
I think the first time he uses conquerors haki and knocks out like 50k guys was pretty bad ass.
Anyone else kinda get Muerem vibes when they saw Luffy walk between Big Mom & Kaido like that?🐐
Thanks for the nostalgia the last one almost made me cry even if i wanted to see DA RED ROCK it was a good video✨
Great video loved all the moments you chose. Never gets old seeing Luffy punch that celestial dragon.
One shotting the pacifista after the timeskip. Insane
Still luffy punching bellami is one of the greatest epic moments of fighting for his dreams.
why does no one talk about the don kreig fight when he has all those spikes on his arm and luffy punches him THROUGH the spikes anyways? i feel like that was the first instance where it was like “oh shit luffy’s badass and crazy”
Bro that, tomodachi no kuni da always get me every timw
Luffy badass moments
When he flat out makes the ultimate mockery towards would be villains
last clip still the goat
F*@K THE CELESTIAL DRAGONS BRUH EXCEPT FOR CORAZON HES THE GOAT
I love that scene after luffy defeated kaido in his gear 5 form and he just floats mid air as skyboats surrounds him. Gives goosebumps everytime
Luffy Dragonson. A true Viking.
I love the moment when he punches the celestial dragon
That moment with jar across the water guy slammed a massive feels moment into me
Looking back at the war. Why didn't Jimbei throw a big wave at the admirals. The water would of made them weak.
Because aokiji would freeze it
Garp isn't a fruit user. Only two would have been affected
@@gabemcknight1994 garp wasn't with them he's a vice admiral is was akainu aokiji and kizaru
yes
aokiji froze 2 tsunamis and u think a wave is enough XD
Props Luffy if nothing else.
0:39 Luffy be like: What symbol? *Sogeking burns it*
Don't abt others but luffy is genius in this kind of situations❤
that last one, looking like a real demon, ignoring kaito and big mom as if they aren't there... you can't be more badass.
he does nothing, nothing at all. and looks completely badass.
MINGOOOOOOO!!!!!!
at first clip , i betrayed naruto
in third clip , i betrayed db and all animes
Its the Rush of anime man. Lol. Listen to Rush an no band can compare. Same with one Piece, it's a masterpiece.
Its the rush of animel man😊
There are very few moments where Luffy is pissed off
Ending was lit❤
Last one is my favorite ❤
Same man. Tug my heart strings
This needs updating. There's been more top 10 badass moments after this now
Num1 got to be have the icing on the cake
The last part you should include *luffy smashing kaido's head*
Luffy is an absolute chad
im a big fan of luffy from the episode 1 until now im still waiting for him to become the pirate king
Goosebumps.
i never realised but isnt luffy's outfit similar like he was in strong world when he beat shiki and is the first time we see his gear third go way over normal into giant territory , its always amazes me how oda is foreshadowing, that movie came out in 2009 only for a similar thing to play out a whole decade later
😱😱😱
Luffy is beast 😊❤
a cena mais foda é o luffy enfrentando 3 almirantes sem nem ter haki somente com uma tora na mão kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
I loved luffy beat mingo like ringodingo😂😂 beatiful king kong K.O❤ love to see forth gear🤩
I love how Luffy just punches no shaningans
There's 3 moment that hit different . Water 7 , sabaody, and marine ford. Cz in this arc we can see different side of luffy. Since the begining luffy describe strong, confident, and etc. But on this 3 arc luffy need to dealing with his crew, facing the Conquense of his act, being weak, fragile and hopeless of losing his brother
There are some reasons why luffy is a savage but goku is the og goat
That show how Oda is growing with One Piece together. Luffy declares war witg the gaverment almost evry chapter and never be hunted by the govorements, while Ace was executed after a battle with Blackbeard whonwas absolutly nothing this time. Even as a son if the Pirate King, his father is a legend like Garp for rhe goverment(old generation). The killing of Ace look too unreal basdd on the whole anime right now....
Great 😊❤❤❤
You should've mentioned luffy clearing half of Hordy's troops
A pirate king isnt bother by two mere yonko
First
Your forget when Luffy used conquerors haki at fishman island to drop out the 50,000 fishman 😎
Did anybody notice that Luffy punched the celestial dragon the same way he punch kaido
Ahh yes the the one way luffy is bad ass is when there is a ring around his pupil
My head-canon is that Luffy's irises are actually white.
Nah, the anime doesn't even have 1/10th the epicness of the manga.
Btw, best luffy moments are the celestial dragon punch in sabaody, and the 1-man-army waiting for sanji in whole cake island.
Very nice Video..but its missing a lot..
Ah yes. MS Photo video editor.
Luffy send the celestial dragon back to manga 🤣🤣🤣
Somefans - luffy is childish
Luffy :
❤Ido trafar law
What ever you say the punch 👊 to celestial dragon remains most epic...none could see their eyes (celestials)and one pirate punch him lol after that borsalino shows and destroyed the crew.... remember the lvl of every epic bad ass moment... celestials are gods...none can touch the gods
9:13 >:D litterally
I'm thinking like, must the celestial not be dead after that punch.. they never experience pain or anything.
You know after time skip and see so much race are in there, and see this scene i was just wondering if these three admiral are from long long leg race. 😂😂😂
Luffy punching Bellamy
What if Black beards is not the enemy but the one who help Luffy take down the government
Luffy's attack was called King Kong gun and not Godzilla Gun
I'm sorry but his most badass moment was clobbering the celestial dragon hands down.
And kuma watching him
Second really
I wonder if Luffy is against globalism?
Ayooo why that Freemason symbol as the A 🤔🤔🤔👀👀👀
Where
Oh no YOU DID NOT CUT LUFFY VS THE ADMIRALS AT THE PEAK MOMENT! NOOooo°°°why? 😲😤😒
Nami might die..... a d the staff of Zeus aka kinyin might be passed to luffy. Expelling anytime of image death cuz of luffy resistance... I really hate to see her go but the moneybking need his staff and he basically acts like the staff would...
what episode is this or is it a move
8:40 hate the anime so much.
In the manga mingo instantly fall by a huge blow.
You gotta admit the prolonged beatdown is awesome though
You don’t show the bad ass moments you cut it too fast bro
yeaseyxeyeyey
From which site can I watch the one piece???
Please suggest me
Crunchy Roll, it’s an app
Lucy not luffy lucy
The most satisfying was the last one when luffy ignored kaido and big mom. It clearly portrays his character where he places his friends above everything and it doesn't matter who is standing in front of him he is always ready to take them down. And this shows that he is king material