Post Scriptum VS Hell Let Loose - Which One Should You Play?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
- BECOME A MEMBER FOR $0.99! ► bit.ly/2rthLfv
Twitch Sub ► / bigfrytv
OFFICIAL "BIGFRY" PARTNERS
Fanatical ► www.fanatical....
ChronoGG ► Bigfry.chrono.gg
Humble Bundle ► t.co/M6tjpLYODw
GamerSupps ► (Use Code "Bigfry" for 10% off)
gamersupps.gg?afmc=BigFry
SOCIALS
Twitter ► @BigfryTV
Twitch ► / bigfrytv
Discord! ► / discord
Instagram ► BigfryTV
Steam Group! ► bit.ly/1fU3xg0
Outro Cover Done by: / @zulegmat
You can pick up either one of these games on my store! Bigfry.chrono.gg
Thanks for the support, and leave a like if you enjoyed the video!
@bigfrytv hell of a way to step up your editing skills this year 💯 no bull, it feels wayyy more engaging watching your videos the way your doing it now, keep it up 💯👍🏿
Hey Bigfry plz do a video kn the recent death of day of infamy
Post Scriptum is way more hardcore... Hell Let Loose is more casual, but both are good.
Great quick breakdown CD!
dont know why but i personally feel its the other way around. whenever i play HLL i kept dying from out of nowhere due to lack of covers in the map. While in PS i at least able to actually play and enjoy the game.
@@count_dcinamon having more cover dont make a game more hardcore than the other, is the comunity and post scriptum share playersbase with squad and squad player are hardcore in the game in the way that they take the game a little more seriously and dont goof around that much, they like to play like it is a simulator
I feel neither are casual they are definitely both hardcore anyone coming to either of these games looking for anything casual are gonna be a bit mistaken.
@@count_dcinamon I mus admit this is how i felt aswell. I had barely any fun and i was getting shot non-stopby spawn campers and flankers in hell let loosse.
Also the terrible optimization compared to post scriptum
The explosions in PS and squad are fucking incredible. The first half hour of playing them I was just dropping morter fire on the firing range
I have both of them and personal i love PS alot more than HLL.
For me what kills HLL is the team play, nobody talk and you don't get that immersion that PS haves. don't get me wrong PS does suffer from this but out of 10 games, about 7 of them my squad communicates, compared to HLL i say its more like 4, and the game it self feels that its less required too do so(ik causal).
The maps on PS are a lot more recognizable and you will learn your surrounding pretty easily while in HLL it feel a lot more bundle together and less fun to play with (i would say this, HLL has way better indoors details, like you know people left in a hurry in those houses while in PS they are just blank buildings).
The gun play is better on HLL , but i do feel getting kills with PS feels more satisfying(personal preference i guess).
PS has a better system for squads; Logistics is a lot more vehicle focus, needing trucks to move the supplies from base to anywhere they are needed(so you basically truck sim 1945), tanks in PS are used more of a strategic vehicle than a destructive one, stopping infantry from coming one way or harassing spawn points. HLL has less variety, with infantry focused Logistics and from my experience tanks are used like if it was Battlefield(not saying is bad, just saying that's not my way of playing)
In gameplay they are pretty much the same, Run, Shoot, cover . But if you have a good squad on any of the games, is one of the best experiences is gaming! That's why its important squad coms.
BUT even tho i do feel PS is better right now, HLL is just starting, HLL could easily pull the carpet under PS's feet if PS is not careful. like BigFry said, HLL has weekly updates, PS does not and they take a while on doing so. So in a year, i could easily be inloved with HLL if they keep updating. They just need to better the sounds, optimize the game, fix some textures here and there and promote squad plays and coms.
Thats what i feel, its fine if you disagree, some of the points might be just personal preferences. But what game to start with right now? PS all the way, at least for now in my opinion.
exactly, i got 11 hours on HLL and ive only had a team communicate 4 times. Althgough i still prefer HLL over PS
@@riley8280 And I've had the opposite, I think I have 9/10 of my matches with people actively talking. Maaaaaybe 8/10. But there's always communications.
exactly team play is trash and i can never get a rifleman to drop me an ammo box no one plays medic and everyone just lets go instead of waiting for medic and no one is penalized for not waiting for medic. I honestly think its a lot like battle field and if i would of dug deeper I never would of bought it.
@@ShuskiCross not just talked we mean like a squad leader and and the whole squad talking and moving together all the time no one kicks stragglers and theres tons of squad leads who dont even talk.
Luke Ellis Yeah because medics are currently pretty much useless... There‘s no ticket system and besides that most times it’s faster to just ersparen instead waiting for a medic.
Your take on the two is really interesting. I would recommend both. I know that's a cop out as the two are so superficially similar but they both have different strengths.
Hell let Loose:
Death is often but less frustrating because you tend to spawn nearer objectives. Also respawns are ubiquitous so almost no-one goes Medic - it's barely a requirement.
I observed the open field vs cover issue but took the opposite experience away. I like the open fields in HLL because they are bound by hedge, wall and ditch cover. So, because of this you GROUP UP. It gives you an awesome feeling of rallying up like you see in ww2 war films and a real sense of the front line because you know that the enemy is also rallied up on the other side of that big field along the tree line so start laying down fire and smoke to advance. For me thats the best of HLL.
Conversely the weapons suck. The sound has already been covered but the handling feels sub-par - needs a lot of polish.
Roles - much easier to get the role you want than in PS as, although there are some specialised roles, you get a good spread and there doesn't seem to be a numbers cap in the squad on roles like PS.
Random obj. placement - I alsways dreamt of this in a game but they implemented it badly. Much of the time it happens in some very boring bits of the map.
To wrap it up - I love the battlefield/war film experience and the ability to jump in and get the role you want to get. Also pretty.
Post Scriptum:
First thing to say is, PS now and PS what is was a year ago are chalk and cheese, the new update with France has transformed it in all ways - Gfx, assets, map design, new weapons etc
Immersion - all I can say is have a new pair of underpants ready because the sound is godlike and terrifying. Explosions, MG fire, Stukas - Many times I've fely actual trepidation advancing out of a trench. No other games does this. Full stop.
Weapons - handling, attention to detail second to none.
Maps - I hated the Dutch maps. I rarely play them. I'll cover that in a second ( Iknow, heresy). Fucking love Stonne. Probably one of the best WW2 FPS maps I've ever played and I'm an old fart and have been around since RO:Ostfront. Dinant - bits of that are very good two, it's just a bit weird for this type of game - thinkng Citadel specifically. Hope they bring out more maps.
Medic - love that you need a Medic, often play it cos I get you jab people and they magically pop up.
Map design - new engine update largely solved what was unplayable for me, however, my main gripe with PS in comparison to HLL is this. Everyone talks about how HLL is arcaade and PS is the real deal etc. My experience (more as a pubber) is that there's little sense of advancing or holding objectives in a realistic way. This, I think, is largely because the amount of undergrowth everywhere combined with low player numbers (in relation to map size) with extra large maps size makes for a Vietnam type environment sometimes - i.e wander through bushes for a mile then get shot from behind by unseen guy who pops up 5 metres away. Also, because cover is EVERYWHERE, there's little incentive to stay co-ordinated and inch around fields and use hedges like HLL. Basically, you either spawn off the spawntruck or the FOB or the radio/SL regroup thingy and everyone just dashes and spreads out towards the objective and soon the unit is all over the show. So it just feels like spawn and run. Sometimes you can have very good unit co-ordination, but it is uncommon and commanders do a pretty poor job generally (but that applies to both games).
So, at the moment I'm playing PS because the update is stunning. But i also drop back in to hLL for a bit of what I like in that.
Phew that was a long ramble :-)
This is a year late but thanks for writing this. It’s nice hearing other people’s views. Although it s a year later and HLL’s player base is definitely higher, it sounds like both games are just a good time with fun and immersion to be found around every corner. Oh and death 🙂
One thing I have noticed about he’ll let loose:
For whatever reason there are SO many clueless players. Almost to the point that it looks like it’s their first ever shooter. I don’t know how, but it’s true.
Maybe some people think 'more slow and tactical' means 'less skilful', and buy it for that reason.
@@MBKill3rCat Nah hes right. There is huge amount of players in HLL who dont have mic, dont be near their squads and go wandering on their own and dont listen to nobody. That is number 1 game killer
@@AndyP998 I know he's right, I was just suggesting why that kind of person might be attracted to HLL
Both are fucking fun as fuck. The only downside to post scriptum is that I found those two guys who pretended to be RnL devs, they teamkilled the entire squad lmao. They were yelling "Bluedrake is god" and killing everyone. It was scary as hell lmao.
hahahahahah loll
I've been waiting for this type of video. Been on the fence about both of them. I haven't played squad in a while. Been floating between Red Dead Online, COD MW, and Insurgency Sandstorm. I quit playing Battlefield 5. Their slow content releases and recent TTK/3D spotting changes have done it for me.
How's World War 3 coming along? I bought it when it was on sale. Played you in a match where you were running around with the RPG.
I got both of them. and they are both fantastic, i suggest waiting till both go for sale. i got PS for 10 dollars and HLL for 15. Both satisfy different urges and have different overall gameplay. although the core of them both are similar.
4:55 "Hell Let Loose because there's already a lot of content there to feed you"
Just to be clear here, this is not meant as an advantage over Post Scriptum because PS has actually a lot more content in almost every aspect of the game. Like 8 vs 2 factions, 11 (bigger) vs 6 maps, 4 vs 2 game modes and a lot more (80+) weapons and (~60) vehicles.
Also regularly both games cost $29.99 US. But when they go on sale, HLL is $23.99 and PS between $14.99 and $22.49.
langpascal he wasn’t down playing the content in PS. He was just saying there is good amount of content for you’re buck.
@@shadow59555 I know that and it's exactly what I wrote. But for new people interested in these games, his statement could be misleading/misunderstandable. That's why I wanted to clear things up a bit. 😉
@@langpascal you are totally right... yes each HLL map looks different.. but thats the extent of it.. PS has LOADS more weapons, vehicles, total maps, etc. and a WAY better ballistics model... you die A LOT, and to some people, thats too much of a turn off. me myself, i tend to do the killing ;)
I agree with you on the Hell Let loose map design. I absolutely appreciate the effort and research they put into making the most accurate WW2 battlefield maps. Especially the Omaha Beach map because of the family history I have relating to that battle (unfortunately my great uncle did not make it off the beach), but war and video games are two totally different things. I play video games because I want to have fun and enjoy myself. I don't want to spend $30 on a multiplayer video game to get frustrated after a few hours because I don't even feel like I can contribute to my team. Thats what made it not enjoyable to me. The game had its moments for me, but overall, it was just not an enjoyable experience. To the people who DO have fun with the game, good on you, keep on playing, and keep supporting your community. I don't want the game to die. Its a special game, just not for me.
Personally, I do quite enjoy the map design of HLL. I appreciate the realism, it makes you feel as if you need to consider your movement and can't just move blindly. I enjoyed your video, nice topics and outlooks brought up, I may consider getting PS soon.
Thats what i was thinking but like fry said everyone has an opinion imo i think HLL maps look more detailed than PS
@@PeekingPixels hey, never played HLL, put 1100 hours in squad and about 300 in PS (PS is newer), I can tell you now, the maps on PS are great, it has surpassed squad overall as a game imo, and I can say that PS and Squad are the best FPS I haver played, defo worth a buy
try moving blindly in ps, see what happens
@@PeekingPixels HLL maps might be little detailed, atleast interiors in building are but overall immersion factor of battle is better on PS. And playerbase who actually talks and communicates more
Ok so I bought hell let loose. Thinning it was better and being against post scriptum. But I got PS on g2a and I think it’s way better than squad and hell let loose.
This is exactly what happend to me. Lmao
I saw a video about HLL and tried to buy it. It was unavailable to buy at the time so I grabbed PS instead. Still never played HLL but I don't really want to. Got 250 hrs in PS and cant put it down.
I have squad almost from beginning, the game changed a lot, I actually liked more the older Squad which was infantry foused only with vehicles but without tanks, now its way harder and its way less about infantry :(...
I totally prefer Post Scriptum to anything out there because I specially love WWII era and I'm kinda bored of modern era stuff.
Also I bought Hell Let Loose, but I don't like it at all...
PS: I also like a lot Rising Storm Vietnam 2 and Tannenberg.
@@guily6669 just play skirmish like I do
Yeah I bought hell let loose and its pretty much battlefield with some poorly implemented team play features that no one uses
So many comparisons are padded out. This one is non-bullshit and to the point
I'll def be subbing
You're right about PS being " take it or leave it ". Entire clans have tried to get the Devs to move on certain issues just to be told " It's my game. If you don't like it, dont play it ". Their PR sucks...
HLL is getting some huge updates at the end of April and we're getting some major updates in the months to come; things like The Eastern Front, transport trucks, some new guns and uniforms etc.I'd wait a little while, for PS to get their Chapter 3 update too.That's on April 23rd, they'll be getting D-Day (Normandy).I know, pretty generic but I'm excited!There'll likely be a free weekend which I will be trying out and might be a sale too!So I'd wait a few weeks, but it's totally up to you.
More people need to give Day Of Infamy a shot. It’s a perfect blend of arcade and simulation.
I find it fun that both squad and insurgency have ww2 versions from the same devs
I'm waiting for either of them to add in the Pacific or the Eastern Front... Red Orchestra 2 is good, but the controls on both of these games are easier to learn for me, which is why I'm anticipating those two fronts. (Leaning more to Post Scriptum). I do like the 1940's France expansion tho; it does that theatre of war better than BFV ever could
Great video man! Definitely helped with my decision making! When you next do a review/comparison video, could you label the gameplay footage so we can help identify the two? With these two games being almost identical, it was hard to tell the two apart! Unless it was all footage from one game then ignore this! Cheers dude
Absolutely love this format, great job!
The new format is cool to me Fry! Im datguySippi in your streams
Just stumbled on this video. Wasnt maching your content THAT much, but always liked your voice. Good idea to put more thought into what you are saying, makes it more enjoyable.
Do you play hunt:showdown at all? I really enjoy it being a hardcore western fantasy game like eft so might be worth a look
Yeah its absolutely awesome!
What's EFT?
@@tpapai9812 Escape from Tarkov
The term good or bad design of maps really depends of the type of game.
An arcade game like CoD needs a lot of cover, very fast paced and what it counts is your skill to aim and shoot first. A bad designed cod map wouldnt have any cover, but in a game when the think that matters is realism, the good map design is the one that is indeed more realistic, thats why i prefer HLL maps, they also have better graphics and details, PS maps have a lot of generic props and objects, the houses are all empty, and in HLL the houses are just perfect.
Houses with furniture, graphics and details is not related to map design, especially considering the grand scale of these maps. It's about gameplay flow.
Graphics?...really? I am even surprised how can someone be so uninformed about what map design means.
@@trailoffiends Gameplay flows when you have people on the artillery battery shooting the enemy, not running in the map like a clown.
@@arturoroldan4839 ...what i said really went past your head xD
I love both. So having both just makes sense to me. If I’m bored of the maps in one I switch to the other for a while. Around 150 hours in PS and 70 in HLL so with the price it’s all good value to me.
I feel like Hell Let Loose is easier to get into for new players
Yeah if you like to be bored senseless and walk around a giant map to never see anyone sure.
@@lacko_taco lmao what you only playing garrison bitch or recon?
I haven't bought any yet because I'm trying to decide, but I am really liking the idea of logistics team and what they do in Post Scriptum. So if I suck as killing players I can still help by building defenses, forward bases and support with more depth. Though if hell let loose added more to that mechanic I'd probably go to them then because I've heard its more user friendly. I don't know. Need to try both on a free weekend.
I can feel a swarm of angry commenters coming; angry at any and everything. Lol
douchy, toxic, BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS
Post Scriptum is EA in Beta its not Full release yet its actually not even half way done . Both are good games but I think if you want a real WWII feel Post is the way to go, the engagement's are so real you feel some PTSD after you stop playing from the gore to the epic explosions I don't think HLL will ever be able to replicate like I said both are great games but Post Scriptum is the better out of the two in my opinion.. Thanks BigFry for your content love your stuff keep up the good content my guy!!
Post Scriptum is not Early Access, at least not on Steam. Its listed as a released game
@@BigfryTV Really? That's news to me im mostly goin on what my friends told me hes pretty close to one of the devs he couldn't tell me much for obvious reasons But from my understanding they have a whole lot more to add and of course I could be wrong so I guess we will just have to wait and find out. Me personally im really hopeing for a Eastern Front and a Stalingrad Map but that's just a wish lol thatnks for responding man Love your stuff
At the end of the day I love you Bigfry
Imo Hell Let Loose is a good game to start this genre, and if you feel good about it and you want something more immersive/harder then go to Post Scriptum.
And with my experience, I can say that Hell Let Loose is more dynamic (well at least not the first 5-10 minutes where you have to run whole god damn map) but often you can't see enemies and die a lot, or you have kills but not seen enemy. In Post Scriptum on the other hand, every kill you make is much more rewarding (you can hear little hit sound when you hit someone) cause you've tried so hard. And in the end of the battle in Hell Let Loose you look at stats and progress bar, but in Post Scriptum that does not matter, because you fulfilled your role as a part of a team and you did your part that ended up letting your team win.
Gives gunplay to the game that doesn’t have a ballistics system based on real gun handling, I know HLL now has it but still
I’ve only played hell let loose and absolutely love it. I think PS is currently in a better state however I see HLL being the better game in the long run with the frequency of updates
Post Scriptum is my favorite game ever, and I have had some really horrible experiences with it. You gotta take the bad with the good.
Bro this was one of the best reviews I've ever watched. Subbed for the simple fact you keep it real lol
I think gunplay is PS far exceeds HLL. The guns have proper ballistics, you can adjust your sights, they sway realistically, sound amazing and have good recoil, and good animations. HLL gunplay feels easier but I wouldn't say better
HLL is till a working in progress so it still has a lot of surprises to come.
Nice video @Bigfry i love the way how you reflect on yourself. Keep up the good work !
I haven't tried PS, but love HLL. PS looks like it has some pros, but what I never see out of streams in that game is actual squad play, everyone runs around solo. In HLL you get squads moving together, covering each other, etc. I absolutely LOVE the maps in HLL, and the dynamic objective spawns means that you can play each map multiple times but you're going to have a different battle each time you do so. The more realistic map style, with less cover, means you need to coordinate as a squad and as a team. One game I had on Utah beach as Axis, we were pushed back almost the entire game, but the commander managed to coordinate an artillery smoke barrage and then 4-5 of our squads ran through an open field under smoke cover, straight into the objective and we took it back -- you can't beat that. Again, not having played PS, but not seeing anything to suggest otherwise in streams -- I think HLL offers far more command abilities and tools. You can mark the map with some 15 markers and coordinate with other squads to good effect. When I first tried HLL over a year ago, the communication was dismal, no one spoke, no one commanded, but now you get some decent squad leads who know what they are doing. I usually play squad lead because back when I started no one could do it, so I appreciate what HLL has to offer in this realm, and I don't see the same coordination coming from PS streams.
BigfryTV That outro song was sick! Awesome choice!
Having neither of the games .... and wanting one or the other . I've watched nearly every RUclips vid out there for either game ...to me the gunplay in ps looks flatout far better ..also with the bullet drop mechanic vs mod hit scan of HLL. Though HLL does look more "polished" overall (u.i and building interiors etc.) So in my unbiased opinion I'm getting PS... because at the end of day it's a shooter...I want the better gunplay.
Hey Fry, I’d love to see more videos in this style in the future. Honestly your EFT video made me consider coming back to the game, and this one was nice as well. Personally in a comparison video like this one, I wouldn’t mind if it was a bit longer, but you went into more detail about each game. Because I’m still curious about the kind of gameplay, as I heard PS was more like Squad (wasn’t it a mod for Squad originally, but made into a full game?) but I’m curious on whether or not HLL would be good for a group of more casual players. Because I’m not about to try and convince my friends to buy Battlefield 5.
Thanks for the feedback. I want to keep these ones brief so that a general gamer can be like, "Yup, okay. Got it" and go. But I can do some deep dives as well in the future!
BigfryTV would definitely be interested in watching both styles, and thanks for the reply, I always like when creators interact with their community as much as they can :D
Hell let loosse movement and firing mechanics is like im playing Day off defeat in 2020 in a milsim simulator. The thing is so stiff playing Project reality is more fluid. Can't disagree more with you on that one. Ugggh
So it fails in both regards. Even the sound design in my opinion. Im not a post scriptum fanboy. But i had a awfull time. Not mentioning a barely playable time. It did not catch me.
He’ll Let Loose is a absolute blast and the developers actually care and communicate with the community. I don’t have post scriptum but whenever I talk to people about post scriptum I just here constant stories of a toxic community. He’ll Let Loose is more casual for sure but also for the better. It’s community is also great with a lot of people willing to talk,communicate, and learn. Yea there are toxic players but that’s in every game. I highly recommend Hell Let Loose as it is shaping into a truly great game.
I own both games and ps is what i chose. Hll aint bad for some casual games but ps is the one which got me hooked for 1k hours now.
Sound and map design is frking good
Based from squad so easy to get to if you are familiar from there.
First I bought PS and played it for a year and I still love it mastered it. Today I bought HLL, let's see how easy it is gonna be to adjust to a more arcady game.
I was surprised at the lack of players. Low 2k is not what I had in my mind for some reason. Might wait on either one of them a bit longer now.
i think you're change of prospective is a good one :)keep it up
Hey @BigFry appreciate the video. Suggestion from a person who hasn’t played either of these games. When switching back and forth between the 2 different games can you put the name of the game being shown in the top right or something like that? Would’ve made things clearer and helped me keep up but that just my 2 cents... have a good one!
It's simple... if your weapon sounds like a kids toy, you're playing HLL.
I like your new style and how you are trying to take your channel Big Fry ❤️keep doing what you’re doing cuzz you are doing a damn good job man .... your channel is way to small for what you are man .... and please upload more gameplay cuzz your gameplay is hella entertaining!!
Both are on sale regularly, both are cheaper than most triple AAA games. Buy both, support good developers.
I'm digging the change you're trying dude
Editing is slick fry I like it. 🤘
I play both
I consider myself as a hardcore ww2 fps games fan and i have many years spent on gaming
i tried both of these games and the one that is better is RO2
STILL unbeaten !
This is a nice video. I was given Post Scriptum for free, I think it's quite a lot of fun and the guns are good but... things like the 1911 are so fucking wild when you are shooting them without sighting in. Your soldier like throws the 1911 all the way to the top right of the screen. It's like, holy shit does he have wrists of glass? lol
I have both games, and I play whatever I'm feeling for the day kinda. Put simply, I put Post Scriptum in a category for a hardcore experience. You mainly play this game just for that. There is no "xp" or leveling. You play it cause you want to. For Hell Let Loose, there is incentive to play to rank up and get small cosmetics....but it damages team play in my opinion. There's a lot of silence most of the time. If you like playing off on your own and leveling up (it really is a grind) go HLL. If communication and feeling rewarded for your actions is more your thing, PS is more that route
I am wondering if i buy one of these games is it going to be worth it? Will the community be toxic and not allow the game to be learned. Are there enough servers etc...
if your happy and you know it clap your hands song
I've got a lot of hours in squad and I love the realism and immersion that squad delivered and that is why I chose post scriptum after debating these two, solely because squad and post scriptum are from the same devs so expected similar experiences. I have to say I was disappointed. I don't believe my poor experience was the devs fault as it wasn't the content itself that disappointed me. What gave me the poor experience was the lack of immersion, players wouldn't work together or communicate like they do in squad, I played 3 matches each on a different server and it was the same on all 3, lack of communication, constant TK, everyone just running around guns blazing like mad men, fighting each other to get the best vehicles. It was just a mess so I ended up getting a refund. I am now going to try out hell let lose hopefully Ill get a more enjoyable experience.
play on European or UK servers with active admins. Far less toxic than US servers....
Really dig the video Bigfry.
PS is a very fine game that’s a WW2 Squad, it’s just a tad bit buggy due to the new update but I like their ideas for the future and currently, i’ve never seen a WW2 game do France 1940. I haven’t played Hell let loose yet but I guess i’ll try it out.
i dont have any mate to play with so i went with HLL, i agree that the communication is bad in HLL, almost no one talks to each other but on the other hand, i feel the gunplay is good, player counts is higher than PS and that's enough for a few round for an evening
Yeah man, more gameplay please! Fuck yeah!!!
Good video. Idk what you're talking about with sounds in HLL, I think they're pretty good. I agree that HLL looks good and always thought PS looks really bad with graphics and color.
Both are better than BFV. Enough said
Have you ever tried Heroes & Generals? It's not a God tier Game but I like it a lot.
@Air Force 1 what do you Mean? It's a serious question...
@Air Force 1 why does your opinion matter? No one asked you to be an a*s.
hey big fry
not sure if you've heard of Foxhole, maybe you should look into it.
Great vid keep it up
If tanks matter, personally I like Post Scriptums tanks more, it allows for a more realistic view, and feel, as well as more options for visibility
hell let loose made the rear sight on the m1 garand way too big its not that big at all irl its more like a peep hole
What's the song playing in the background in the beginning?
I will say, as someone who just recently picked up RO2 again and got that nostalgia feel, which one of these games would be the suitable replacement? PS seems to be the consensus.
Which game is better hell let loose or post scriptum?
Oh thanks Bigfry, I actually recommended this game
In regards to HLL comments. I think they should consider adding more bomb craters and blown out vehicles in open areas. It is rather annoying.
Post scriptum, just looks super ugly for me, The game is really blurry at 1080p.
So far I'm liking HLL better because the maps look almost photo realistic at distance, In post scriptum everything at range is just blur and pop in it looks horrendous.
must be your settings or rig cause it looks amazing and not blurry for me at all
Hell let loose broke the 64 player limit. Fucking Finally
Another great vid!
Love it man, great point of view
I own squad, PS, HLL. There’s space for all of them, but sometimes I just wanna run raids on an MMO. There’s space out here for every game, nothing is bad, except asset flipping devs out to rip us off. Other than that just enjoy your shit
i think HLL would be great for people that enjoy realism above gameplay and willing to feel that loop of kept dying because you tried to cross open fields (a lot) while PS is great for people that want a more balanced tactical WW2 shooter with focus on gameplay.
Look over here BFV look over here. This is how you make a WW2 shooter today!
Different target audiences
I really love both.
hell let loose has hitscan how can it win in the shooting aspect
"We're gamers." - BigfryTV 2K20
I like your “scripted content” BigFry. It actually makes you sound like an educated intellectual.
Backhand compliment
In hell let loose i have a problem where server auto kicks me for high ping (70 ping xd), my region is Israel so i am pretty sure everyone knows hell let loose and regions is a problem... Question is can i play post scriptum on an acceptable ping without getting autokicked?
Both are better then every BF, especially after BF 3
Only me:
Forgotten Hope 2?
So Hell Let Loose sounds tinny. Does that mean Post Scriptum has a more woody sort of sound design?
Honestly, Hell let loose sound design does not compare to post scriptum. Problem is hell let loose has like no bass or impact. "In my opinion"
@@timonenluca4live I was actually just making a Monty Python reference
They are both too mil-sim for my taste.
I'm more of a Red Orchestra and Rising Storm player.
The lack of maps in hell let loose is also a big turn off though i do enjoy some of the maps there.
hell let loose is early acces and got better with every patch. its way more better slowly
HLL is getting a whole new sound engine soon
What again is EFT?
For Americans watching this PS is 29.99 on Steam and HLL is 39.99 so just putting that out there
Good video brother.
everyone forgets about day of infamy
I put teamwork as my number 1 priority when it comes to these kinds of games . What should i buy ?
HLL
I’ve heard that it’s HLL players don’t talk much and post scrptum is a little more hardcore when it comes to teamwork but i’ ll still keep this mind.
ps forsure
Im a little late but in post scriptum comunication is obligatory, you can't win against a cordinated enemy, in hll i've tried being leader and or they don't respond or they insult you so for me ps is the better game for communication
HLL ridiculously optimized and expensive, i preffer PS beautiful game
Well said mate.
I'm a 5 year planetside 2 vet. The first time u play that game u do nothing BUT DIE 😂 . Still loved the game tho.
Love ur content mate 😉👌
A lot of hell let loose maps are exactly copies of aerial recon photos so for realism it is what it is