As the evidence becomes even stronger, it seems odd that whilst NASA can track potential asteroid impactors the size of a fridge from deep space, itt can't lay a glove on an object several times the size of Earth.
@@thatperson6471 It doesn’t exist or did and was ejected. Also it’s very possible something else not in our solar system caused these disturbances in these outer objects and has long since moved on. It’s a hoax.
Nasa have found it but "they" don't want us to know it's where the secret alien base is, the home of the lizard people that run the new-world-order ... man... 🚬
@@bothewolf3466 not true. Nasa did say they found a large gravitational pull on Neptune. Something Pluto wouldn't be able to do. This channel is clickbait but nasa did release that statement which means there is something out there. Something big. Most likely a planet that go ejected from the solar system but never truly left due to Neptune. Since Neptune is a foreign object it means this planet might be what Neptune failed to eject after taking it's place. (You can tell Neptune is foreign cause the farther you go the lighter planets get /not dwarf planets/ and Neptune is almost more heavy then earth or Venus making it not forming in this system plus the aphmosphere is completely different than the types that were in the solar system. Meaning it's foreign cause every planet has at least three or four of the same chemicals and compounds as each other except for Neptune. It barely had any, and the /any/ are some of the most common in the universe. Making Neptune alien. This planet that is out there is the true rightful 8th planet and Neptune would technically be planet 9. If you never heard this it's cause it's part of the solar system rabbit hole of facts you should check it out it's really cool. This is not meant to be mean or insulting btw I'm just making sure you don't think it's all made up. This dude is basically playing 2 truths 1 lie with the whole world. Plus making fake news while having nasa will prolly get his sued so......he kinda picked the wrong company to play that game with.. I hope it's not another gas giant tho. It would really be cool to find a planet with frozen oceans mountain and stuff we could maybe make a colony on. Cool
Actually by that logic planet 9 is 2000 because eris makemake ceries and heumea are dwarf planets and there are also millons of spherical objects that couldnt clear its orbit
"They" still do. This video was a visual work of art, but it presents a theory as 'fact' and proceeded to proclaim that since 'everybody' thought so, then it must be true. Until I read about it in Astronomy or Scientific American I won't believe it.
@@michaelc3987 it was downgraded to Dwarf Planet in 2006, as it didn’t fulfill the three newly agreed upon conditions to be termed a planet. One reason they decided to define what classified a planet was because we began finding so many other Pluto-sized objects in the Kuiper Belt and Astroid Belt, that if we lumped them all in as bona fide planets, there would be over 200 in the solar system. This seemed like a lot of new names to memorize, so they decided to define planets as having these three qualities: 1- be large enough to become round under its own gravity 2- orbit the sun 3- clear your orbital path of other orbital bodies Pluto is round, and orbits the sun, but it’s on an irregular orbital path that actually brings it in closet to the sun than Neptune for part of its orbit, and thus it was decided that it didn’t clear its own orbital path, and therefore didn’t qualify as a planet, and was demoted to Dwarf Planet* *there has been new debate about how to actually classify planets recently, since we’ve found so many obvious planets orbiting other stars, but since they don’t orbit our sun, they technically wouldn’t quality under the 2006 definition as planets. This is obviously dumb, so hopefully they’ll rewrite the definition again, and they’ll expand the definition to include Pluto, and the host of other dwarf planets that caused the whole debacle in the first place.
A planet is a planet, whether massive or dwarf. Pluto still orbits the sun, and is still a ball-like structure, same as any other planet. So NASA's search is actually for Planet 10.
@user-cw9qn1nb2n NONE of that matters because the data gathered leading to the idea of "Planet 9" was invalid because the telescope had not been maintained properly. When it was corrected and the data gathered again, it aligned PERFECTLY with the existence of a dwarf planet, they named "Pluto," perturbing Neptune's orbit. You'll note that this video cites ZERO sources, yet makes assertion after assertion about what could be... it may as well be "Ancient Aliens."
We have a telescope now capable of seeing it, wouldn’t they have looked in to that before trying to find the edge of space? Seems pretty easy to verify with how advanced they say it is.
This planets orbit is (supposedly) insanely large... i wonder if ancient humans could have detected it better than us because it was closer to them at the time 🤔
We struggle to view objects inside of our solar system because of our perspective, it's harder to view what an object looks like from the inside. The reasons we can view distant galaxies has to do with the amount of light they produce, where as a gas giant produces no light of its own and is so far back in our solar system that the amount of light that our sun hits it with is insufficient for reflection. Our methods to view exoplanets depends on interactions with their host star. For example, the transit technique works by measuring the amount of light a star visible to us produces when a planet is crossing our view verses when an object is not crossing our view. The radical velocity methods works because we can see a wobble of the distant star the orbiting object causes. We do not have the ability to use either of these methods in our own solar system because we do not have a probe deep enough in space that we can view our solar system from the outside. This is also why we struggle to see the Oort cloud around our solar system and why we have trouble viewing the shape of our own galaxy. I hope this helps and you can google it farther.
I appreciate the detailed explanation...makes sense...still makes me think shouldnt we explore all that we can closest to earth first? Sortive like us not exploring our own ocean before expanding to space?.
@matthewsheeran Well, maybe so, but to do so, it would have to exist for a period of time to do so. hmmm... Besides, isn't that part of Hawkins Paradox that all black holes eventually evaporate.
Btw. The power of pine cones has caught my attention recently. Instead of being the lotus 🪷 expanding outwards. The pine cone shows how everything expands outwards while growing and expanding upwards similarly to our universe 😊 i found some the other day and seen the resemblance in the flower of life or lotus 🪷 while seeing all the layers and generations that has gotten us this far to where we are now all through a pinecone and the things I have learned and explored these recent years 😊💛✨️
@tomthx5804 I'll give my love and respects to that 😉 although I did grab a pinecone from that ground that looked like a dog turd, still flat and round, only to see how it expanded overnight becoming it's true self and I never knew pine cones did that until I witnessed it within a day simply by being myself instead of an ass of a hater 😉😆😘❤️🔥
@tomthx5804 which btw my coworkers noticed them in my work van and felt as if they was some sort of good luck charm. Sorry you had warm, steaming, dog turd between your toes this morning bro
This debate has shifted back and forth as various studies have tended to support one conclusion or the other. This is common at the edge of science. A similar pattern has been happening in "the crisis in cosmology" (differing results regarding the age and expansion of the universe). Another example would be the WIMP (weak interacting massive particle) versus MOND (modified newtonian dynamics) models for explaining dark mater. The simulations described are an interesting addition to the debate and seem to support the existence of a large planet beyond Neptune.
Of course, planet 9 exists. It's called Pluto, and it was discovered eons ago. What you folks are looking for is the tenth planet. You know, the next number after 9. The last digit on your hand when you count fingers. Now that you guys know what you are looking for, go find your nemisis.
If you've ever read zacharia stichen's theory about the early universe theory ... this hints to a few of his theories (many see them as fictional and many see them as myth). I just read them for fun taking them with a grain of salt.
His books are honestly really good, fairly plausible and I liked his explanation/interpretation of the sumerian texts. I think he's been debunked but honestly. I think it would make an awesome Sci fi movie
They should name it *Tyche* the greek god of success, Fortune, Luck, and prosperity. Mainly those last 2 And i have a theory that Planet 9 is the fofth gas giant that got "launched out" of the solar system
Years ago I believed In a second sun.. Planet X / planet 9/ nibiru whatever you want to call it. I even seen a second sun in the sky.. my husband also witnessed this but he doesn’t believe. I do… there are some people who pay attention to various things going on/ experiencing things in their lives more then others… one thing that lures me away from this, is if there was another planet so close to earth that doesn’t create havoc when it’s near. Then it’s not real
You saw a Sun Dog. About 40 miles from me, there was a pretty spectacular Sun Dog sighting. I didn't see it, but several people in that neighbourhood confirmed they did, with a few sun dogs spotted early one morning. It seems to be a good area for sky-borne mirages in Scotland, probably on account of the high humidity. As well as Sun Dogs, there are reports of a second Moon and things commonly attributed to UFO sightings (not aliens, they are simply mirages, reflections. I saw a particularly good mirage a quarter of a mile above my house, one night when I was out meteor-watching. This was a mirage commonly called a Tictac. Quite excited at the time, but I soon gave it some thought - and after a while, I realised that all Tic-tacs are simply partial mirages of commercial passenger jets. Once you think of them as mirages, that explains their ability to achieve such amazing speeds. Think of a time when you have been travelling along a straight road on a hot day, a mirage of water on the road ahead. As you travel forward, that mirage can suddenly leap back and forth a couple of a miles in an instant. Also, think of the description of Tic-tacs - they are like the back part of a plane's fuselage, minus wings, tail and lights. In fact, they are the bit behind the engines, where there is a concentration of humidity. Just distort that image a bit, including the windows (commonly included in sightings of Tic-tacs), and you have it. The reason why there are more UFOs, Sun Dogs, second Moons, etc is because we are pumping more water vapour into the atmosphere. (I think, for even 1 degree Celsius of global warming, there is 7% more extra water added to the atmosphere. So, we must have added something like 10-11% extra in recent times. That's a lot of extra possibilities for mirages).
I have made astrological calculations : P9 is Pluto P10 is Eris P11 is Salus : RA 13 degrees DECL : -15 to +15 degrees, ecliptic coordinates. Which means constellations of Pisces or Cetus. Size : 2000 km diameter Semi major axis : either 82 or 100 AU Now near its aphelion at a distance of 130 to 190 AU: Thank you for your attention.
If there's a planet 9 out well beyond Neptune then can there be a planet 10 or more much much farther out? Perhaps so far out that planet 10 wouldn't have any gravitational influence on TNOs?
All I want is to be told either it's for sure out there or no it's not out there, having not found it yet is okay in my book because space is big. It's the not knowing for sure like by now with our technology we should be able to tell if there's a missing planet in our solar system.
@@Rick-qf5de we don't know if this is the kingdom. it could just be some dwarf planet. there are many. the kingdom has a special orbit, we shouldn't jump the gun.
Nice but it should have been explained which is the influence of planet 9 in Sedna and others, leading to suppose its existence. In other words facts and reason
The Atharva Veda written around about 1200 BCE - 1000 BCE, has the first accounts of Planet Nine, though it's not called that, along with all the planets in our system. Including Pluto, again not named that.
To whomever posted and named this video; Lying in the title makes NASA and whomever you are just look less than. This is a NASA post, no one except flat earthers expect lies to be anywhere in this post. This might just be a video though it’s a NASA video damnit! Have some pride.
Why would planet nine be in sync with Neptune? If it affects the trans Neptune objects all the time then it must stay near Neptune all the time. Not getting ahead in its orbit or behind in its orbit like the other planets in the solar system do with each other.just wondering.
I'm N9001 and I'm from Planet 9. I'm here, but I'm hiding from you. Go straight, sharp turn left, straight, sharp turn left, straight, then right. You will find me here, big arse and all.
Rather than assume it’s a planet, why isn’t the thought or concern present of a micro black hole, or perhaps the dark matter created by our sun has accumulated enough mass in one section of the solar system
This seems to be old evidence. Anyone interested in this topic has seen videos and read articles about those TNOs' orbits. I'm glad I skipped ahead. Not exactly clickbait, but this is out of date, old news. If there's new news it'll be in the scientific journals. I'll go double check and if I'm wrong I'll come back and delete this comment. But there's no new news. Correct me if I've missed something.
Does anyone know that all these pictures NASA shows are just computer animations of what they think the planets look like ??? They are not showing actual photos of them !! It's all just to make you think they are honest about it !! Who can say they are being truthful about it ?!?!?!? They claim they know nothing about our own oceans and other locations in the world , but they can tell you about planets billions of miles away ???!! If they see what they say, then they can see the bottom of the Mariana trench!! Or are y'all that nieve !!!???
Um am there's more than eight planets in the solar system. There's even more than nine. There's hundreds and we need to start learning about them. I don't want to learn about just eight. I want to learn about 150 you guys are just so lackluster. It's not planned at 9:00. It's planet 100 and something or even more
The existence of "Planet 9" was first proposed due to supposed perturbations of Neptune's orbit. After decades of searching, it was discovered that the proposed perturbations were due to BAD DATA. When the data was checked and confirmed, Neptune's orbit was found to be perfectly in line with the predictions originally proposed based on the proven physics we base ALL our findings on. I thought this channel was based on fact. What a shame.
As the evidence becomes even stronger, it seems odd that whilst NASA can track potential asteroid impactors the size of a fridge from deep space, itt can't lay a glove on an object several times the size of Earth.
Was anyone else kinda disappointed that they haven't found it yet
I am, but I believe it will be found in our lifetime with using James Webb Space telescope!
@@thatperson6471 It doesn’t exist or did and was ejected. Also it’s very possible something else not in our solar system caused these disturbances in these outer objects and has long since moved on. It’s a hoax.
They found it and lost it about 4 times in my lifetime.... reality they found nothing yet.
They should call it planet not😮😅@@verilyveronica8430
Nasa have found it but "they" don't want us to know it's where the secret alien base is, the home of the lizard people that run the new-world-order ... man... 🚬
Tell me about it when you've captured an image. Until then, this is just clickbait XD
@@bothewolf3466 not true. Nasa did say they found a large gravitational pull on Neptune. Something Pluto wouldn't be able to do. This channel is clickbait but nasa did release that statement which means there is something out there. Something big.
Most likely a planet that go ejected from the solar system but never truly left due to Neptune.
Since Neptune is a foreign object it means this planet might be what Neptune failed to eject after taking it's place.
(You can tell Neptune is foreign cause the farther you go the lighter planets get /not dwarf planets/ and Neptune is almost more heavy then earth or Venus making it not forming in this system plus the aphmosphere is completely different than the types that were in the solar system.
Meaning it's foreign cause every planet has at least three or four of the same chemicals and compounds as each other except for Neptune. It barely had any, and the /any/ are some of the most common in the universe. Making Neptune alien.
This planet that is out there is the true rightful 8th planet and Neptune would technically be planet 9.
If you never heard this it's cause it's part of the solar system rabbit hole of facts you should check it out it's really cool.
This is not meant to be mean or insulting btw I'm just making sure you don't think it's all made up.
This dude is basically playing 2 truths 1 lie with the whole world.
Plus making fake news while having nasa will prolly get his sued so......he kinda picked the wrong company to play that game with..
I hope it's not another gas giant tho.
It would really be cool to find a planet with frozen oceans mountain and stuff we could maybe make a colony on.
Cool
Exactly. Come on NASA, you should be better than botbait!
*CORRECTION, IT'S "PLANET 10" NOT 9 BEING DISCUSSED, AS I NEVER HAVE RECOGNIZED NOR COMPLIED WITH THE DEMOTION OF PLUTO FROM PLANET 9 TO A PLANETOID*
coorection: it dont matter if you do. it isnt.
It’s called a dwarf planet. Also Vulcan had it worse. It was demoted from existing.
Completely agree! Small though it is, Vulcan should have higher status. Pluto should have remained as a planet.
Actually by that logic planet 9 is 2000 because eris makemake ceries and heumea are dwarf planets and there are also millons of spherical objects that couldnt clear its orbit
@NASASpaceNews This video sucks ... Same information WE'VE ALWAYS KNOWN. -Unsubscribed -
I doubt that NASASpaceNews has any affiliation with NASA.
See ya 👋
That's because it's NOT NASA! Just clickbait. They misrepresent themselves.
@@roncatdog: It doesn't!
More like rediscovering. The ancients knew about and have written about it their writings.
Those graphics! Worth the speculation! Thanks very much!
Be sure to unsubscribe and downvote the video for the clickbait title. The algorithm will do the rest.
@@DetectiveGumshoe2025 I'm not going to let complete strangers decide who my friends will be.
Strange that just a few years ago, the "experts" nearly all disputed any potential for such a thing to exist.
"They" still do. This video was a visual work of art, but it presents a theory as 'fact' and proceeded to proclaim that since 'everybody' thought so, then it must be true. Until I read about it in Astronomy or Scientific American I won't believe it.
Did I miss the part about how distant it is from Earth or the Sun or Neptune?
Nope. He doesn’t tell anything more than 5 times the mass of Earth. Nothing new. We must wait… 😅
Many great. Our universe is great surprise! Wonderful! Thanks ❤❤
PLANET X ‼‼‼‼
Planet X Nibiru or OSIRIS-TUTANKHAMUN RISE UP AGAIN
Niburu ❤️🔥💛😇🖖👽🤙🪷✨️
Planet X; Planet X; Planet X! 😤
Has musk bought it already?
Planet X Nibiru or OSIRIS-TUTANKHAMUN RISE UP AGAIN
Correct , but they needed to get rid of planet X or planet Ten by downsizing Pluto .
They were talking about a possible planet X long before they downgraded Pluto
👏🏼Great Job NASA.
Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto. That's already 9 planets, so shouldn't this be 10 or has Pluto been downgraded?
@@michaelc3987 it was downgraded to Dwarf Planet in 2006, as it didn’t fulfill the three newly agreed upon conditions to be termed a planet. One reason they decided to define what classified a planet was because we began finding so many other Pluto-sized objects in the Kuiper Belt and Astroid Belt, that if we lumped them all in as bona fide planets, there would be over 200 in the solar system. This seemed like a lot of new names to memorize, so they decided to define planets as having these three qualities:
1- be large enough to become round under its own gravity
2- orbit the sun
3- clear your orbital path of other orbital bodies
Pluto is round, and orbits the sun, but it’s on an irregular orbital path that actually brings it in closet to the sun than Neptune for part of its orbit, and thus it was decided that it didn’t clear its own orbital path, and therefore didn’t qualify as a planet, and was demoted to Dwarf Planet*
*there has been new debate about how to actually classify planets recently, since we’ve found so many obvious planets orbiting other stars, but since they don’t orbit our sun, they technically wouldn’t quality under the 2006 definition as planets. This is obviously dumb, so hopefully they’ll rewrite the definition again, and they’ll expand the definition to include Pluto, and the host of other dwarf planets that caused the whole debacle in the first place.
Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet almost 2 decades ago. The proposal for "Planet 9" came before it's discovery.
A planet is a planet, whether massive or dwarf. Pluto still orbits the sun, and is still a ball-like structure, same as any other planet. So NASA's search is actually for Planet 10.
@user-cw9qn1nb2n NONE of that matters because the data gathered leading to the idea of "Planet 9" was invalid because the telescope had not been maintained properly. When it was corrected and the data gathered again, it aligned PERFECTLY with the existence of a dwarf planet, they named "Pluto," perturbing Neptune's orbit. You'll note that this video cites ZERO sources, yet makes assertion after assertion about what could be... it may as well be "Ancient Aliens."
@@DerekWalsh-l4i there are lots of dwarf planets, not planet 10 then
We have a telescope now capable of seeing it, wouldn’t they have looked in to that before trying to find the edge of space? Seems pretty easy to verify with how advanced they say it is.
@@thechapulinred it sits opposite earth behind the sun..no telescope can see it
Spot on!
@@jameshurley224 No... I think that's OZ.
They have to know exactly where to point the telescope
@@thechapulinred if they are not looking for it they found if a long time ago.
This planets orbit is (supposedly) insanely large... i wonder if ancient humans could have detected it better than us because it was closer to them at the time 🤔
We can see other galaxys, but not around our entire solar system?
We struggle to view objects inside of our solar system because of our perspective, it's harder to view what an object looks like from the inside.
The reasons we can view distant galaxies has to do with the amount of light they produce, where as a gas giant produces no light of its own and is so far back in our solar system that the amount of light that our sun hits it with is insufficient for reflection.
Our methods to view exoplanets depends on interactions with their host star. For example, the transit technique works by measuring the amount of light a star visible to us produces when a planet is crossing our view verses when an object is not crossing our view. The radical velocity methods works because we can see a wobble of the distant star the orbiting object causes. We do not have the ability to use either of these methods in our own solar system because we do not have a probe deep enough in space that we can view our solar system from the outside.
This is also why we struggle to see the Oort cloud around our solar system and why we have trouble viewing the shape of our own galaxy.
I hope this helps and you can google it farther.
I appreciate the detailed explanation...makes sense...still makes me think shouldnt we explore all that we can closest to earth first? Sortive like us not exploring our own ocean before expanding to space?.
Could it be that planet 9 is a small black hole, and that's why we've been unable to find it.
That is one of the theories.
No. Presumably a black hole that small would evaporate.
@matthewsheeran Well, maybe so, but to do so, it would have to exist for a period of time to do so. hmmm... Besides, isn't that part of Hawkins Paradox that all black holes eventually evaporate.
Btw. The power of pine cones has caught my attention recently. Instead of being the lotus 🪷 expanding outwards. The pine cone shows how everything expands outwards while growing and expanding upwards similarly to our universe 😊 i found some the other day and seen the resemblance in the flower of life or lotus 🪷 while seeing all the layers and generations that has gotten us this far to where we are now all through a pinecone and the things I have learned and explored these recent years 😊💛✨️
I have the same theory, except it's based on dog turds, not pinecones.
@tomthx5804 I'll give my love and respects to that 😉 although I did grab a pinecone from that ground that looked like a dog turd, still flat and round, only to see how it expanded overnight becoming it's true self and I never knew pine cones did that until I witnessed it within a day simply by being myself instead of an ass of a hater 😉😆😘❤️🔥
@tomthx5804 which btw my coworkers noticed them in my work van and felt as if they was some sort of good luck charm. Sorry you had warm, steaming, dog turd between your toes this morning bro
This debate has shifted back and forth as various studies have tended to support one conclusion or the other. This is common at the edge of science. A similar pattern has been happening in "the crisis in cosmology" (differing results regarding the age and expansion of the universe). Another example would be the WIMP (weak interacting massive particle) versus MOND (modified newtonian dynamics) models for explaining dark mater. The simulations described are an interesting addition to the debate and seem to support the existence of a large planet beyond Neptune.
Of course, planet 9 exists. It's called Pluto, and it was discovered eons ago. What you folks are looking for is the tenth planet. You know, the next number after 9. The last digit on your hand when you count fingers. Now that you guys know what you are looking for, go find your nemisis.
Thanks
Plan 9 from Planet 9 ...
@@palindrome1959 so plans 1-8 were even worse?
@Sam2sham They offed Pluto, so we have to get a replacement!!!
@palindrome1959 and these were the aliens who would have taken over the earth back then in the future.
Bring back Pluto - it is loved by the public.
@@thegreypath1777 so goes the goofy-Pluto paradox!!!
it's niberu
Science is always confirming what we already know.
Very interesting 😊🥰🤣
I love this
If you've ever read zacharia stichen's theory about the early universe theory ... this hints to a few of his theories (many see them as fictional and many see them as myth). I just read them for fun taking them with a grain of salt.
His books are honestly really good, fairly plausible and I liked his explanation/interpretation of the sumerian texts. I think he's been debunked but honestly. I think it would make an awesome Sci fi movie
Could planet 9 be a black hole?
They should name it *Tyche* the greek god of success, Fortune, Luck, and prosperity. Mainly those last 2
And i have a theory that Planet 9 is the fofth gas giant that got "launched out" of the solar system
This point I believe nothing affiliated with the government says.
Grammer not good. Think, then text.
@@ConcreteLand In 13 years you are too dumb to put a pic on your account
@@ConcreteLand yours is auto corrected.
@@Neowarshark that is a meaningless point. Thx for trying tho. 👍
Grammer? 😂
Legal ótimas informações sobre o nosso planeta.hsa.2024
what's the orbit like!?
If you are an astronomy buff and are looking for science content, keep looking.
Show us the image of planet 9. Nope, just a theory that is it.
shouldn't they be able to take the rough exact location of all the objects and plug them in and have the program determine where it should be?
Years ago I believed In a second sun.. Planet X / planet 9/ nibiru whatever you want to call it. I even seen a second sun in the sky.. my husband also witnessed this but he doesn’t believe. I do… there are some people who pay attention to various things going on/ experiencing things in their lives more then others… one thing that lures me away from this, is if there was another planet so close to earth that doesn’t create havoc when it’s near. Then it’s not real
You saw a Sun Dog. About 40 miles from me, there was a pretty spectacular Sun Dog sighting. I didn't see it, but several people in that neighbourhood confirmed they did, with a few sun dogs spotted early one morning.
It seems to be a good area for sky-borne mirages in Scotland, probably on account of the high humidity. As well as Sun Dogs, there are reports of a second Moon and things commonly attributed to UFO sightings (not aliens, they are simply mirages, reflections.
I saw a particularly good mirage a quarter of a mile above my house, one night when I was out meteor-watching. This was a mirage commonly called a Tictac. Quite excited at the time, but I soon gave it some thought - and after a while, I realised that all Tic-tacs are simply partial mirages of commercial passenger jets.
Once you think of them as mirages, that explains their ability to achieve such amazing speeds. Think of a time when you have been travelling along a straight road on a hot day, a mirage of water on the road ahead. As you travel forward, that mirage can suddenly leap back and forth a couple of a miles in an instant.
Also, think of the description of Tic-tacs - they are like the back part of a plane's fuselage, minus wings, tail and lights. In fact, they are the bit behind the engines, where there is a concentration of humidity. Just distort that image a bit, including the windows (commonly included in sightings of Tic-tacs), and you have it.
The reason why there are more UFOs, Sun Dogs, second Moons, etc is because we are pumping more water vapour into the atmosphere. (I think, for even 1 degree Celsius of global warming, there is 7% more extra water added to the atmosphere. So, we must have added something like 10-11% extra in recent times. That's a lot of extra possibilities for mirages).
Years ago I read a book about this but the author called it Neburu.
Niburu*
I have made astrological calculations :
P9 is Pluto
P10 is Eris
P11 is Salus : RA 13 degrees DECL : -15 to +15 degrees, ecliptic coordinates. Which means constellations of Pisces or Cetus.
Size : 2000 km diameter
Semi major axis : either 82 or 100 AU
Now near its aphelion at a distance of 130 to 190 AU:
Thank you for your attention.
They must mean Pluto is planet 9 and they found planet 10.
Correct.
Incorrect.
@@lincolnlog5977 wrong.
@@Digikidthevoiceofreason Right.
@@lincolnlog5977 completely wrong in all regards.
If there's a planet 9 out well beyond Neptune then can there be a planet 10 or more much much farther out? Perhaps so far out that planet 10 wouldn't have any gravitational influence on TNOs?
I am still curious as to what effect. if any, the Red/Brown dwarf star had when it passed through our solar system 74,999 years (oe so) ago
All I want is to be told either it's for sure out there or no it's not out there, having not found it yet is okay in my book because space is big. It's the not knowing for sure like by now with our technology we should be able to tell if there's a missing planet in our solar system.
I understand. Dont pay their salaries next month!
And God said let the mountains crumble to the Sea.... !!! 😮
@@Rick-qf5de we don't know if this is the kingdom. it could just be some dwarf planet. there are many. the kingdom has a special orbit, we shouldn't jump the gun.
It's odd they haven't found even a hint of the planet
this isnt evidence, im a believer of planet 9 too, but this doesnt mean its evidence still
Nice but it should have been explained which is the influence of planet 9 in Sedna and others, leading to suppose its existence. In other words facts and reason
The Atharva Veda written around about 1200 BCE - 1000 BCE, has the first accounts of Planet Nine, though it's not called that, along with all the planets in our system. Including Pluto, again not named that.
Many interesting. I think Planet 9 exist. We will know! ❤
It does. It’s called Pluto.
To whomever posted and named this video; Lying in the title makes NASA and whomever you are just look less than. This is a NASA post, no one except flat earthers expect lies to be anywhere in this post. This might just be a video though it’s a NASA video damnit! Have some pride.
Many ancient civilizations knew about the existence of another planet we are kind of late to this or at best just rediscovering.
no they didnt thats just some conspiracy bs like those people who say the aliens built the pyramids
It's there.
Where?
Planet 9 exists beyond Neptune... Yeah, that's Pluto.
I know, I know, they downgraded it to a planetoid... But it's still a planet to me.
Why would planet nine be in sync with Neptune? If it affects the trans Neptune objects all the time then it must stay near Neptune all the time. Not getting ahead in its orbit or behind in its orbit like the other planets in the solar system do with each other.just wondering.
Would think we would have found one 50 years ago . Heck it's a planet not a tennis ball .
would planet 9 orbit beyond Kuiper belt?
This damn channel * IS NOT NASA*
Don't be fooled by it's clickbait headlines
I'm N9001 and I'm from Planet 9. I'm here, but I'm hiding from you. Go straight, sharp turn left, straight, sharp turn left, straight, then right. You will find me here, big arse and all.
WEll, polar ice cores do show our ice ages and the neat 10,000y summertimes. Which we are 2,000 years late for as M Mathis depicts.
Rather than assume it’s a planet, why isn’t the thought or concern present of a micro black hole, or perhaps the dark matter created by our sun has accumulated enough mass in one section of the solar system
Or maybe it’s the point at which we are forming a molecule in another dimension
Planet 9 has a name you know. It’s called PLUTO. You’re looking for Planet X which is a roman numerical for 10.
Ah, yes. Yuggoth.
Was it really just discovered
So.....why can't we see it?
THAT RIGHT IN THE RIGHT SPOT
And they’ve ruled out dark matter?
Yes. I'm a plebe, and I can rule out dark matter! Jeez.
We found planet 9 in the 30s , it is called PLUTO 👍
a star shooting out of a black hole that has a planet.
Pluto,is still there also. Lol
We already had one by the name Pluto.
DP dwarf planet
The dark side of the moon
Planet 9 Is nibiru
Planet greater than earth 5 times and not visible to the big telescopes
Pluto called and wants to know. WTH
I thought the 9th planet was pluto so wouldn't this be the 10th planet
DUDE, Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet almost 2 decades ago. "Planet 9" was proposed before it was even discovered.
We already had 9 Planets until a bunch of eggheads demoted Pluto.
@@jimakin3541 you got that right
When this Planet Nine is found & proofed then it is discovered until then this is just imagination.
There's no accounting for scientists' egos. They want to prove that there is no God. They can't prove a negative statement. Nonny noonoo, so there!
This seems to be old evidence. Anyone interested in this topic has seen videos and read articles about those TNOs' orbits. I'm glad I skipped ahead. Not exactly clickbait, but this is out of date, old news. If there's new news it'll be in the scientific journals. I'll go double check and if I'm wrong I'll come back and delete this comment. But there's no new news. Correct me if I've missed something.
Of COURSE Planet 9 exists. We've known about it for nearly a century. Its' name is, "Pluto".
Does anyone know that all these pictures NASA shows are just computer animations of what they think the planets look like ??? They are not showing actual photos of them !! It's all just to make you think they are honest about it !! Who can say they are being truthful about it ?!?!?!? They claim they know nothing about our own oceans and other locations in the world , but they can tell you about planets billions of miles away ???!! If they see what they say, then they can see the bottom of the Mariana trench!! Or are y'all that nieve !!!???
Um am there's more than eight planets in the solar system. There's even more than nine. There's hundreds and we need to start learning about them. I don't want to learn about just eight. I want to learn about 150 you guys are just so lackluster. It's not planned at 9:00. It's planet 100 and something or even more
Simulations? Astronomers see what they want to see. GIGO. End of story.
Where's Duck Dodgers when you need him?
It's mathematically suppose to exist.
'supposed' ... and no, it's not.
Second sun pic in Dubai is nemesis passing Sun to reignited perihelion every 385 days we will be on same side next passage be in prayer and repent now
This video is a little bit clicky and whole lot baity😂
What is all this about "Planet 9?" Everyone knows Pluto is the ninth planet what's the problem? Are RUclipsrs idiots?
What is a TNO? Trans-Neptunian Objects. Just say the words, we are not all scientists.
scintists some time wrong
This does not confirm. You lied in the video title. Everyone hit do not recommend channel so we can kick these jokers off YT
B-52s song Planet Claire. Elon stolen "X" is unusable, caught in constant gossiping world wide.
It's made of Dark Matter. ;)
You need to stop the dishonest clickbait titles or else I will block you guys and never see one of your videos again
Planet Mickey!
I feel scammed.....
@@ir8123 So does Pluto.
So does Pluto.
What a load.
The existence of "Planet 9" was first proposed due to supposed perturbations of Neptune's orbit. After decades of searching, it was discovered that the proposed perturbations were due to BAD DATA. When the data was checked and confirmed, Neptune's orbit was found to be perfectly in line with the predictions originally proposed based on the proven physics we base ALL our findings on. I thought this channel was based on fact. What a shame.