Strategy with 91% win ratio: tested and EA

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 46

  • @mkhpd
    @mkhpd 29 дней назад

    Thank you. Your code is far more elegant than mine and I learn something new every time. (Now I just need to remember which video I saw that particular bit of code😊 for next time!)

  • @a.porteghali7402
    @a.porteghali7402 23 дня назад

    Thank you. To be honest, I shocked when I saw the title of the tutorial. it promises a high profit at first glance which is in contrast to your standard channel contents. However, when I watched the tutorial, I found it is your usual brilliant technique of evaluating a strategy through coding.

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  20 дней назад +3

      Thank you for taking the time to go through it all. I did say maybe profit is increased by running multiple symbols. I'm putting it to the test. I have a live 5K account running this on 4 symbols. Let's see how it goes.

    • @ardiwijaya5172
      @ardiwijaya5172 13 дней назад

      ​@@OrchardForex hi hows the update, would be a blast if you make a video on the result ;)

  • @antoniomachado8782
    @antoniomachado8782 29 дней назад +2

    Very Interesting video! With your explanation, it becomes much easier to start to understand the code and its logic.
    Could you please consider making a video (or maybe a short series) where you would develop a structure to create a Multi-symbol EA?
    The reason I make this suggestion is because I'm trying to develop a multi-symbol EA, but the indicators' values retrieved for the last closed candle (1) of the base symbol and for the other symbols aren't correct. For the base symbol, yes they're correct (values relative to the last closed bar (1) ), but for the other symbols, the values retrieved are the ones of the previous bar, I mean, bar 2... Which, of course, shouldn't happen. If, somehow, you could shed some light on this, that would be super helpful!.. Thank you very much!

  • @JureZupanec-w8v
    @JureZupanec-w8v 19 дней назад +1

    By testing the strategy on my own I just couldn't replicate the results from the original video. Then I realized that "our" strategy as coded in this tutorial apparently just isn't working completely in the same way. I think that the original strategy doesn't open a new trade when another one is already open (and is waiting for a win or for 10 candles to close). I base this on:
    1) In StatOasis video chart examples (on 3:00) there are never two simultaneous trades open even when the criteria are met. Notice the candle just under the crosshairs on position 6/21/2024. A short position should have been opened there, but wasn't. (You can see the lower wick going below the previous candle low.)
    2) On 8:00 he explains that after eliminating the long side for AUDUSD the average for the short side improved from $50 to $77.50 because "... so some trades will have time to work..."
    I'd be glad to hear your opinion on this and also whether someone has already tried using SL and/or TP with this.

  • @JureZupanec-w8v
    @JureZupanec-w8v 25 дней назад +2

    Thank you for another worthy video. A question: wouldn't it be more efficient to just send BuyStop or SellStop orders instead of checking on every tick if the price has reached our Buy/Sell level? I mean, we check for the pattern i.e. reset the entry prices on a new bar anyway. Wouldn't this shorten testing time significantly? As for any slippage in live environment: isn't it the same risk for Market and Stop orders?
    Just a thought, maybe I'm missing something...

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  20 дней назад

      Good question, but I don't have a good answer. I just didn't think about that. Slippage is generally less for stop orders because they are already with the broker but in reality slippage can go both ways so for trading on a daily chart I wouldn't worry about it.

  • @jamesomban6054
    @jamesomban6054 3 дня назад

    Hello sir, thanks a lot for sharing your knowledge. Are you still accepting clients for making ea or not anymore?

  • @marcovalentinoalvarado3290
    @marcovalentinoalvarado3290 28 дней назад

    Didn't even see the video yet but, liked!

  • @smetljesm2276
    @smetljesm2276 29 дней назад

    Good video.
    I am kind of surprised at that 10 candles to close and no SL rule. That a long time on the daily. 10th day got little to do with first IMO.
    Very surprised it didn't blow the account.
    Me maybe some recovery trades or grid to break even would improve the profitability.

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  29 дней назад +1

      If I get time I might try some improvements.

  • @stanleymusiime1601
    @stanleymusiime1601 18 дней назад

    Hello sir, thanks for the very high quality code you share. It's very useful. Thanks so much. A kind request: pls give some thought to coding chart patterns like the head and shoulder pattern? I don't see any examples of these anywhere on RUclips for mql5. Yes for python I have seen neuro trader, but that's about all. If you are able to consider an example or how to about developing code to identify and trade chart patterns this would be really great. Thank you!

  • @Stisse12
    @Stisse12 17 дней назад

    Hi,
    Interesting and high win rate, but with high losses… have you tried optimizing this?
    I am quite new learning mql5 and automated trading, but have tried a lot for 6 months, my question to you that seems to be the one experienced and also serious here o. RUclips, it’s it possible to have a profitable EA?
    What would you recommend ?
    Are there EA to buy that really works?
    Thanks for charing, you have learned me a lot on this subject

  • @mr.adamprince4853
    @mr.adamprince4853 29 дней назад +1

    Thank you Sir

  • @milkovivaldi
    @milkovivaldi 22 дня назад

    Instead of "continue" is it faster to use a filter like "if(what I want)" in this case the compiler doesn't go further into the code right? And is there any reason to write the variables profit and time instead of writing the classes directly?

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  20 дней назад +1

      The compiler goes through all of the code, the difference is at runtime. Using continue means at runtime the process goes directly back to the beginning of the loop where embedding inside an if statement means runtime first goes to the end of the if block. And using all those embedded if blocks is just poor code to maintain.
      I used variables for profit and time for readability in the tutorial, you can use the classes directly.

    • @milkovivaldi
      @milkovivaldi 20 дней назад

      @ yes, in fact I use unique “if” block only whether there is nothing else in the function therefore if compiler does not entry into if the function is finished otherwise is better continue, thanks 🙏🏻

  • @MinhTruongNguyen-em8jk
    @MinhTruongNguyen-em8jk 15 дней назад

    Is this "Smash day Patterns" of Larry Williams? If I was right, this strategy can use for S&P500 with 75% Winrate.

  • @skeetabomb
    @skeetabomb 28 дней назад

    I have a complicated model I wish to code but I need help. How does one contact you for paid coding or advice?

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  28 дней назад

      Sorry, I don't do custom work.

    • @aht786
      @aht786 24 дня назад

      Hi, I would love to do this for you.

  • @BerndAnzenberger
    @BerndAnzenberger 29 дней назад

    I tried this EA for different forex pairs, all on period of min. 10 years. No account was blown up, but win / risk ratio was bad (risk of blown up account for few procent win). But maybe I did something wrong 😅
    Then I had same idea and mixed with recovery EA. I ended up only using the recovery EA on occasions like earnings or economic news ...

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  29 дней назад +1

      The video with the original strategy ran tests over 10 years (or something like that). A recovery plugin could be a big improvement.

    • @boreneoman7728
      @boreneoman7728 29 дней назад

      lol

  • @jafxtradinginstitute6395
    @jafxtradinginstitute6395 29 дней назад +2

    Hello .
    50ema cross aboce 200ema
    If Supertrend indicator is uptrend
    Enter buy when WPR indicator goes oversold and abd 5ema cross above 21ema.
    On H4 timeframe
    Stochastic must be above 50 level
    QQE indicator must have fast line cross above slow line.
    Code this please.

    • @aht786
      @aht786 24 дня назад

      Hi, I would love to do this for you.

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  20 дней назад

      Are these changes to this strategy or something completey different?

    • @jafxtradinginstitute6395
      @jafxtradinginstitute6395 19 дней назад

      @@OrchardForex same nothing change .

  • @donbangert
    @donbangert 29 дней назад +2

    I suspect this strategy would be better suited for stocks.

    • @pabslabspabslabs4589
      @pabslabspabslabs4589 29 дней назад +1

      A lot of these daily bar strategies are good for indexes which are generally going up..sp500, nas100 etc

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  29 дней назад +1

      The video with the original strategy ran all tests on currencies, but you could try it for anything.

  • @RichWayGlobal
    @RichWayGlobal 12 дней назад

    Hi, can you please paste the code to me?

  • @apostolosserkezos875
    @apostolosserkezos875 29 дней назад

    can we use this strategy manual on demo accounts?

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  29 дней назад +1

      You can use any automated strategy manually, but you do have to consider being at the terminal all day and night.

  • @mpatel_in
    @mpatel_in 29 дней назад +1

    which time frame for this system?

  • @funshabets5000
    @funshabets5000 29 дней назад

    Risk/reward is terrible in fact you can't assess what your reward or risk will be. Let's say you want to risk 2 percent, this is impossible with this strategy, you're risking your account.
    Pattern might be useful whithin a different strategy, but there is not hope for this particular strategy . Excellent coding though !

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  29 дней назад

      Thanks about the coding but aren't you just saying what is already in the video? If I used this I might ass take profit and stop loss.

  • @Kashfxalgo
    @Kashfxalgo 23 дня назад

    I tested it got totally different results

    • @OrchardForex
      @OrchardForex  20 дней назад

      Hard to know why but it could be as simple as quality of backtest data and a different source.