Funny thing happened last night. I am in Rancho Mirage for business. Last night I got in and decided to go the the casino. Wanted to try the $136 system. The tables were full so I did some digital. Played for 2 hours. Did great! Walked away up $135. There was a guy that had played near me a couple of seats over. I cashed out and was walking around. That same guy, who I did not talk to at all because I am a female traveling alone, stopped me and showed me ur video. I smiled and said yeah, they are great. I follow them as well. He said he tried a couple os systems and they work. He had a big grin on his face. I live in Az. Small world…. Thought you would get a kick out of this… you guys are Super stars!!!!! 😂
I ran this through a simulator. Single zero. $2000 max bet, which is what you need for this strat. I set it to walk away at +$200 or go broke. Obviously, some of the sessions won more than $200 depending on which step got you over the $200 line. For example, one of them went to step six and hit, ending the session at +$700. I ran 15 sims. Sim 9 I went broke. The rest made money. After 15 sims, I am -$100. I might do more and post and update. I like the system. I can see myself trying this online, if I could find a low-limit-single-zero-table, and do half of what they showed here. Buy in $2050, start with $5. If you walk away +$15 (or more depending on which step). I know you are thinking why bother, but if you are doing this on your phone while you are on the toilet, +$15/day is $5,475/year.
this is one of the riskiest martingale styles. If you got 2500 or 5000 dollars and dont mind grinding out money i recomend going for 10, 30, 70, 150, 310, 630, 1270, 2550 bets. Basically each spin you play is a $10 win, win or lose (supposing of course you get a win on your last spin before losing your buy in). If you manage to survive for 30 spins and win, you will end with $300 profit. Use at your own risk, ofc.
I tried it on a roulette app and went up $210 and then lost it all ($5100 buy in). Too rich for my blood. I'm going to stick to my $10 on 19-36, $10 on 13-24, $10 on 25-36, and then martingale it. I always walk when I'm up $200 or down $2000 ($3000 buy in). It's worked for me so far. I go about 5 times a month and have not lost this year. Good luck. But the way, it's a push on 13-18.
for those curious, the math behind this is that the odds of straight up losing 7 50/50s in a row to fully lose your $5100 buy in are ~0.78% realistically you would want an extra $5100 somewhere to use to make sure you can recover if you get super unlucky and bust on the first try. that should probably be enough because losing 14 50/50s in a row is a ~0.0061% chance, and after you lose that first 0.78% chance, odds are on your side for not losing that again in a while. somehow this manages to be super safe mathematically but super horrifying in practice at the same time. edit: ok apparently i forgot to account for the 0 & 00, but the idea is the same. accounting for those your chance to lose 7 in a row is 1.118% and losing 14 in a row is 0.0125%. this is because the odds aren't 50%, they're 18/38 which is more like a 52.6% chance to lose each spin
But also got to take in account the moment that you’re winning! Are you winning when you’re starting over (minimum bet) or winning when your doubling down on the loss (big win) so those odds that you said make sense but would it pay off? All depends when those winnings come in
Awesome system! A- Grapefruit it is ! I got a little lucky Martingaling last night over at the MGM Grand playing the same 6 "streets" of 1 to 3, 10 to 12, 16 to18, 19 to 21, 25 to 27, and 34 to 36. +$105.00 profit in about 15 minutes.
I knew a guy that was 86ed out of Ellis Island for being an "Advantage Craps" player. From what I observed from his play he was a huge tipper, always stood near his sides dealer and would say something to the dealer every roll, then every 3rd or 4th time he would have lost due to a 7 the dealer would say the player turned his bets off but didn't get to put the button on his chips. I believe a few dealers vanished from working there after that as well.
Being on night shift and not much to do, I ran this strat the way Alex played it (before I read that you switch when you hit) in a sim at 10 rounds of 30 spins each with the highest bet hit in each round. Round 1 - 34 Spins +890 Highest bet= 1300 (forgot to stop at 30) Round 2 - 30 Spins +500 Highest bet= 500 Round 3 - 30 Spins +520 Highest bet= 500 Round 4 - 30 Spins +480 Highest bet= 500 Round 5 - 30 Spins +690 Highest bet= 500 Round 6 - 29 Spins -4580 Highest bet= 3000 Round 7 - 30 Spins +270 Highest bet= 60 Round 8 - 30 Spins +1140 Highest bet= 3000 Round 9 - 29 Spins -4900 Highest bet= 3000 Round 10 - 30 Spins +390 Highest bet= 180 Going to take a break for a bit then try it again with switching the hi/lo after the hit
@@BomberR6 looks like basically in both trials of 10, he won something 8 times, but lost big on round 6 and 9 on the first run (-4580, -4900) and round 2 and 9 on the second run (-5070, -5020). All of the big losses would have wiped out any winnings he had and then some. He would have lost overall 4600 on the first run and 3780 on the second run.
can you guys organize your video categories by like how you think the rating system is. eggplant peach plum ect.. would be easier for us to find the best videos to watch
@@etblok9359 false! the eggplant vids are the absolute funniest ones. We all might have originally came for the grapefruits, but we all end up staying to watch daddy david and alex DONK! ;)
Funny thing is I've always played like this since the day I started lol. I don't always martingale and I don't always bet on the same thing, but it's basically this, 2 dozens or 2 columns
The strategy is simple but intriguing but I'm basically 99 percent certain that it wouldn't hold up long-term. Short-term you could have some big wins on some nights in the casino but long-term I think the losses would wipe out the gains. The biggest issue here is that there is only room for 7 betting progressions, which just isn't enough. Losing 7 times in a row on 1:1 happens more often than you might think and will destroy this strategy. I ran an admittedly quick test using a free online roulette game and, playing this system through 10 sessions, I went bust for 3 of those sessions. Those 3 sessions going bust were more than enough to wipe out the 7 sessions where I won really good money. I expect that this system would go bust maybe 20 to 25 percent of the time with only 7 betting progressions and taking a big loss even 20 percent of the time would wipe out the 80 percent of the nights where you made money. If this system allowed for say 11 betting progressions, then it could be viable but 11 betting progressions with this strategy wouldn't be realistic because the bets at the end of the progression would be too large for 99.9 percent of the population to make and plenty of casinos wouldn't allow bets that large either.
Yet it's impossible to win if you bet on every spin. Thus after a loss bet only in your mind. Do it again and take another loss. Third time start the loss system. If you only are betting a color or a section paying 1:1 it could be difficult. Yet if betting col's the ball fall must now be more random than many reds or blacks or 18 below or 19 or above. Col's IMO offer more chances long term in any system. Plus bet the Zero's as a percentage of a high col. bet. Now the table is cut down to 3 col's. & 2 green slots. Betting 2 col. & greens means only 1 col is against you.
Yes... I've studied roulette a lot of have worked out why ALMOST every system is bound to fail. So with this one it's about 128 to 1 chance of that combo coming up eventually. One morning I rocked up at a casino and I saw the previous night 10 10 10 appeared on the table next to me. Ironically my first 3 spins was 10 10 10. That's like 36 000 to 1 happening twice. I did win a bit, but I didn't realize until it happened. So you are correct. The key is understanding why...
Here's my simple method. Say 4 blacks in a row is 16 to 1 chance of appearing. Az you say it happens. Find 2 tables that in 10 spins have had a high concentration of blacks and then do a progression bet on reds and ZERO on table 3. This is a simple one that doesn't take too much brain power. Also you can mix up the combo's. But like my 10 10 10... You will hit that wall at some point...
its actually pretty good, I used it on online games with more money and its work just fine with big hits too, but if you are unlucky ( like fail 4 times or more) and dont have enough money to keep adding up for profit then its not worth it.
1:29 "find a table with like a $3,000 limit" Yea, that's the problem. The casinos have caught-on to martinagle systems and have lowered the limits as a result. I recently saw a $10 table with a $200 limit. So on this system that would be $10, $30, $90, and you're screwed.
Pretty sure the $200 limit you saw was for the inside on a single number. Even the lower tier casinos have a 5K limit on the outside. Most of Vegas has 10K maxes. Tables maxes on roulette tables refer to inside not outside.
It done me a few times where it didn't hit my group something like 25 times. For me this strategy doesn't work. And I've even modified it where I only start betting once it didn't land on a specific group 7 times. And still sooner or later, the amount I needed to bet was more than the casino's limit and I lost big.
For double zero. Odds of hitting the same color in a row. So reverse it for the loss. This strat gives you 6 shots. 98.87% chance to win. Number of Spins Ratio Percentage 1 1.11 to 1 47.4% 2 3.45 to 1 22.4% 3 8.41 to 1 10.6% 4 18.9 to 1 5.04% 5 40.9 to 1 2.39% 6 87.5 to 1 1.13% 7 186 to 1 0.54% 8 394 to 1 0.25% 9 832 to 1 0.12% 10 1,757 to 1 0.057% 15 73,732 to 1 0.0014% 20 3,091,873 to 1 0.000032%
Great system, however I got dangerously close to my limit at times. I've found that a modified martingale version works well by doubling your prior bet but increasing by 10 when you get past 20 then increasing by 20 when you pass 200 then increasing by 40 when you pass 1000 and so on. E.g. 10, 20, 50, 110, 240, 500, 1040.
i like your martingale system, it lets you start with 4000ish and gives you 1 more spin 8 total over this guys 7, im not as risk adverse, so this one sits more comofortably.
This system is absolutely cracked. The key is alternating the 1-18 and 19-36 after every win. With 5k buy in, you can survive the inevitable 6-7 bullets and still come out on top
why is important to alternate the 1-18 and the 19-36 bro? I use this system and its good but its make sense to me to keep riding the same numbers until it hits, though sometimes i got unlucky and fail like 4 times jaja
09:20 Alex won $60 here, not $80. Betting progression is 10, 20, 60, 180, 500, 1300, 3000? That doesn't seem right...Aren't you just tripling each bet after 20 (540, 1620, 4860)?
No, you're doubling your losses and not tripling your bets: "so bet 10 and lose we are -10, so we bet 20 and lose we are -30, so now my next bet is 60 and we lose we are -90, next bet 180 and we lose we are -270, from this point on we dont exactly do double losses but we get close, bet 500 and we lose we are -770, bet 1300 and we lose we are -2070, at this point you are broken, scared and down to your last 3000, you slap it all on in my experience over the last 2 years i have gotten to this point and lost this bet 4 times, but have won this bet more than i care to remember."
@@redbirdsjunkie My point is that if you "Double your losses", you're just 3x-ing your last lost bet. The $60 and $180 bets are consistent with this, but the following bets are not. If you were to double your loss after the $180 bet, you'd bet 2 x (180+60+20+10), which is $540...which is 3x180. I'm saying that the whole "Double Your Loss Martingale" title is not accurate, because the $500, $1300, and $3000 bets aren't following this progression.
I think even money MG Lover would work with this progression as well. Black, Even, and Big. Run them as separate bets. Regress on wins. It worked for me so far.
This is wack. 8 in a row happens way more often then you think. I've been wacked. Playing 2 dozens and I seen it go same dozen 12 tines in a row. My triple martingale on two dozens wrecked me. It's all good till that streak is against you!
Streaks mean nothing for the odds. The outcome of a spin is independent of previous spins. When I was last in a casino they even gave you paper and pencil to keep history if spins. The casino knows that this does provide any advantage to the players
@@craigalexander9421 Wrong, the whole game of roulette is based on streaks. This is how I make my money just over 2 years already, full time. What you say has zero influence on anything and any fish knows what you afe saying. The focus is on streaks and probability
@@ruanoosthuysen5002 Probability is why in the long you are more likely to use. With every bet the odds are in the favour of the casino. Also a streak of reds does not mean a black is more likely
@@craigalexander9421 What you are saying is correct for small samples of spins. However, if we assume that the wheel is fair and each trial is independent (which I assume you are), then a sample of spins should tend toward the same distribution over large sample sizes and for many trials. For instance, say you have a fair coin and take a several samples of 100 flips. In most of them, we would expect to see close to 50 Heads and 50 Tails within a certain range. This is because we expect a binomial distribution. We know that statistically a sample with 100 Heads is less likely than one with 99, 98, 97, ... , 50 etc. So while each independent flip may be independent and the probability the same, if we are assuming a fair coin, it is likely that given a large enough amount of samples, the results will average to approximately 50 heads and 50 tails. This is how we can use statistics for testing samples to verify that a product meets standards. In this way, if one defines an appropriate sample size with the null hypothesis that all outcomes are equally likely, one can predict whether a certain combination of flips is more likely to be observed. While this method cannot be used to predict the result of a coin flip it can be used to decide whether to guess heads or tails more reliably than simple guesswork because we know the coin is fair. With roulette, the concept is similar if we assume the wheel is fair since any 1:1 bet has probability 18/38, the other one 18/38, and 0-00 has 2/38. We can then keep track of the outcomes like a coin as if we are taking a sample that we know the makeup of. We can then test our null hypothesis that all outcomes are equally likely with a sufficient sample size, say 76 spins and on average we will expect roughly 36 spins of one 1:1, 36 of the other, and 4 of 0-00. If we keep a running total of the outcomes similar to card counting we can then slightly improve our guesses near the end of the sample if it is one sided. For instance, if we have our sample size of 76, and we are on spin 70 with Red = 44, 0-00 = 6, Black = 20, we might choose to guess that black is more likely since a more representative sample is more likely.
Not at 10 or 25 a bullet. I play lots of roulette and systems, pretty rare When I have something hit 7-9 times continuous. 5K buy in, with 10-25 bullet? Nah, this is pretty decent.
Obviously every strategy in roulette is not in our favor, but I would like to see them alternate no matter win or loss, most people on here keep saying they have seen a color or section hit for way too many in a row. If you alternate you win or lose you won’t ever bust on long streaks, only by truly having really terrible luck lol.
Hmm yes do more "research", Alex. How to make it more a grapefruit system, or close to it. Play it next future videos. Would be interesting to see what you come up with. Thanks!
Played this last night using $1 on the ETG... and less than a minute a spin, I was making $60/hour. You dont lose! Play for hours and double up every hour, play with house money. 2nd hour, play $2/hour, then 3rd hour play $5 for the next hour... come out a WINNER!
All bets in roulette have a casino advantage of 5.26% except for the five number bet on 0, 00, 1, 2, 3 that has a casino advantage of 7.89%. The RUclips videos by CEG Dealer school imply that their "systems" can beat roulette but in reality in the long term, their systems don't improve your odds at all. This could mislead people into losing thousands of dollars.
I read about a system like this about 10 years ago as a way to beat online casinos. It was mentioned to keep payouts low to avoid raising flags as most places would ban you for this style of betting.
You have to keep your bets low because of table limits. If you start at a $100 bet, you get only like 6 bullets. If you start with $10, you should get about 10 bullets. And like the comment above. Nobody is kicking you out for winning a chance game where the house has the edge.
You won once does not mean you win every time. When I always hear people tells me roulette strategy which is Martingale, I will laugh it out loud. By losing 12 - 13 rounds straight is so common in roulette. You will feel the pain once you are in that shoe.
After crunching some numbers you end up at -$1000 EV since you bust every 90 systems and win only $4000 after 90 systems of survival. If each system was around 2 bets, I don't think you would make up the difference in discounted drinks and comps. Surprised this person made 40k his positive variance is through the roof!
its actually pretty good, I used it on online games with more money and its work just fine with big hits too, but if you are unlucky( like fail 4 times or more) and dont have enough money to keep adding up for profit then its not worth it.
So the dude won on 4,000 roulette spins to make 40K at $10 start strategy. Lets say he wins 66% of all the spins he plays, making his total spin counter 6,000. It takes around 2 minutes to clear table, take bets, close bets and pay bets, etc... My dude played 12,000 minutes of roulette which equates to 200 hours or 8.3 days of non stop roulette. And he said he goes to the casino only 4 times a year to make 40K. Something doesn't line up, either the guy just wanted to look cool by showing he knows how to win money with the most time consuming method or he has no idea how Martingale strategy works (at the end of every win, you make your min bet as profit).... I call bs on the 40k winnings.
He said in a post here, he usually cashes at $500-$1k and walks and comes back later and sometimes he makes the whole $5k in one sitting. It's not just $10 wins every spin, you have to figure in the profit if say he martingales to the higher levels. The wins get bigger. So it's not 4,000 spins.
No matter the system, the dealer can land the ball anywhere from 3 to 5 spaces. If you win more than 4 times, watch the dealer. If he doesn't make eye contact with you before the spin and looks down, he will be trying to place the ball so you will lose. 75% of communication is non-verbal. Use every aspect you can to win. Same as poker.
I see 11 to 20 in a row of a sequence on a daily basis though. Ifbyou think you can just random bet and MG, goodluck, you will be broke before dinner. They key is to wait
You can also do this black/red, we call this escalera in our country. I dont know if i spelled it rifhf. But you just gonna double your lost. Like its just be so bad losing 7x. If youre betting high.
On the risk vs reward double ur loss martingale,,,,,, you mention startin with 10 and if you lose ,, you state the increments as 10 20 60 180 500 1300 …… how is the bet increments go from 180 to 500 if your doubling your loss,,,, plz clarify
I've never liked the MG system. Too easy to reach table limit and lose all. I devised my own system years ago ( now copyrighted) that plays specific numbers straight up. With a "gentle" progression of bets, I walk away winner nearly every time.
I have a strategy I’ve been kinda making up maybe you’d like to try it and see if it’s cool. Bet X amount on two of the three 12’s that pay 3:1. (Ex. $25 on 1-12 and $25 on 13-24) it has the be the same amount on both. Then bet 1/5 the size of X amount on 4 numbers that are NOT within those 24 paying numbers. (Ex. $5 on 30,33,35,36 or you could throw a 5 on a 0 if you please). Basically this makes it so 1-24 will profit you $5 and if one of the 4 other numbers hit you profit $105, all off a $70 bet. So 10 numbers will bust your bet but the other 28 will make you some money. Adjust bets according to budget- and it’s very slow and not aggressive so you’ll lose money slower! I’ve also played around with putting those 4 numbers within the 24 range and that would profit you an extra X amount bet if hit but also lower your spread on the board. I’ve been tweakin it but maybe you have some suggestions too or would like to try it for a video. Thanks!
@Jason Bourne that's why you got to be happy that big hit and bounce. David got the whooper hit and stayed ahead the rest of the way. Alex had fewer donks but made less money because of it. House edge is what it is. If you play roulette you have to live with it.
I won nearly half a mil in bitcoin and it was much easier than this garbage not to say I couldn't of lost but these casino house games are trash you're a fool if you play plain and simple.
Casinos love this system more certain you are to lose.The the longer you sit down the more you will lose most especially when sitting at a wheel with 2 greens. This system has been around for decades and the Casinos love it these suckers think they have an unbeatable system but seriously these RUclipsrs should warn people. The problems are simple to point out 1/ You cannot keep doubling down sooner or later you will hit the table limit. 2/ This method requires a win obviously however if you get 8 reds in a row the odds of a black coming up are exactly the same. The table does not remember anything. Now due to human Psychology we are pattern seeking animals so we do not believe this. The odds against such a sequence can be hundreds to one or thousands. But the system requires you to play a large amount of hands. Eventually you will be in such a sequence and lose thousands.
20 - 10 = 10 . You're not doubling anything , Man . Thats why my numbers are 10 , 40 , 120 on a 10 system . Start low as possible . I do 0.50 until i find a cheaper option somewhere . 40 - 10 = 30 - 10 = Gain of 20 . 120 - 50 = 70 - 30 = Gain of 40 . etc .
The numbers in the video more reflect a 5 starter system . Numbers are 5 , 20 , 60 , 160 , 400 , 960 , etc . Very close to a 0.50 , 2 , 6 , 16 , 40 , 96 , 192 , 448 , 1024 , etc system . Numbers are a little off though . Think it through . Numbers are fun .
This an amazing betting strategy. However, I would begin the progression on 2 losses to extend betting rounds. For instance if there were 2 reds in a row start 3rd on black.
I'm a dealer of 20 years. Please nobody bet this way. The system itself is whack. Also, most roulette wheels are triple zero nowadays also. Happens against very frequently. You'll go bust as your raising your bets way too much.
Note out of the 9 spins ... 6 were in col 1. 3 were in col. 3. What would you have made if you had played only those 2 cols each time? $90 with no loses.
Funny thing happened last night. I am in Rancho Mirage for business. Last night I got in and decided to go the the casino. Wanted to try the $136 system. The tables were full so I did some digital. Played for 2 hours. Did great! Walked away up $135. There was a guy that had played near me a couple of seats over. I cashed out and was walking around. That same guy, who I did not talk to at all because I am a female traveling alone, stopped me and showed me ur video. I smiled and said yeah, they are great. I follow them as well. He said he tried a couple os systems and they work. He had a big grin on his face. I live in Az. Small world…. Thought you would get a kick out of this… you guys are Super stars!!!!! 😂
So you where in Rancho mirage, did you go to Morango Casino?
@@ronalddiaz7380 Agua Caliente
@@karinwittman8858 Thanks
Guy at casino ask me to teach him to how to play roulette. I told him it would be cheaper for me to teach how to do drugs.
They definitely have a nice Casino. I'm a local, did you like it?
I ran this through a simulator. Single zero. $2000 max bet, which is what you need for this strat. I set it to walk away at +$200 or go broke. Obviously, some of the sessions won more than $200 depending on which step got you over the $200 line. For example, one of them went to step six and hit, ending the session at +$700. I ran 15 sims. Sim 9 I went broke. The rest made money. After 15 sims, I am -$100. I might do more and post and update. I like the system. I can see myself trying this online, if I could find a low-limit-single-zero-table, and do half of what they showed here. Buy in $2050, start with $5. If you walk away +$15 (or more depending on which step). I know you are thinking why bother, but if you are doing this on your phone while you are on the toilet, +$15/day is $5,475/year.
Re do this video cus the way martingale and explain doest male sense why don't you on screen show the martingale seq then explain it
this is one of the riskiest martingale styles. If you got 2500 or 5000 dollars and dont mind grinding out money i recomend going for 10, 30, 70, 150, 310, 630, 1270, 2550 bets. Basically each spin you play is a $10 win, win or lose (supposing of course you get a win on your last spin before losing your buy in). If you manage to survive for 30 spins and win, you will end with $300 profit. Use at your own risk, ofc.
I tried it on a roulette app and went up $210 and then lost it all ($5100 buy in). Too rich for my blood. I'm going to stick to my $10 on 19-36, $10 on 13-24, $10 on 25-36, and then martingale it. I always walk when I'm up $200 or down $2000 ($3000 buy in). It's worked for me so far. I go about 5 times a month and have not lost this year. Good luck. But the way, it's a push on 13-18.
Do you martingale total bet same unit once? 1st bet total is $30. Do you go $60, the $120??
Can you post their RUclips link to the system you play ? Tha nks
hol up with this system without martingaling it doesnt even favour the house does it?
If you close your eyes, it's almost like Bert and Ernie on a roulette wheel. This is great.
for those curious, the math behind this is that the odds of straight up losing 7 50/50s in a row to fully lose your $5100 buy in are ~0.78%
realistically you would want an extra $5100 somewhere to use to make sure you can recover if you get super unlucky and bust on the first try.
that should probably be enough because losing 14 50/50s in a row is a ~0.0061% chance, and after you lose that first 0.78% chance, odds are on your side for not losing that again in a while.
somehow this manages to be super safe mathematically but super horrifying in practice at the same time.
edit: ok apparently i forgot to account for the 0 & 00, but the idea is the same. accounting for those your chance to lose 7 in a row is 1.118% and losing 14 in a row is 0.0125%. this is because the odds aren't 50%, they're 18/38 which is more like a 52.6% chance to lose each spin
But also got to take in account the moment that you’re winning! Are you winning when you’re starting over (minimum bet) or winning when your doubling down on the loss (big win) so those odds that you said make sense but would it pay off? All depends when those winnings come in
@@Rudyni03 No, that doesn't change anything. It's losing, like every single system.
Not including your hoping that the casino is not shady
Bro I have seen 15 loss streaks many times so yeah
@@askforalawyer7181none of the strats actually work from this channel it's all luck not strat
Awesome system! A- Grapefruit it is !
I got a little lucky Martingaling last night over at the MGM Grand playing the same 6 "streets" of 1 to 3, 10 to 12, 16 to18, 19 to 21, 25 to 27, and 34 to 36. +$105.00 profit in about 15 minutes.
Can we get more info of the person who got backed off for advantage dice game??
Please I would like to know!!! Because that is the way I play craps...THANKS
I knew a guy that was 86ed out of Ellis Island for being an "Advantage Craps" player. From what I observed from his play he was a huge tipper, always stood near his sides dealer and would say something to the dealer every roll, then every 3rd or 4th time he would have lost due to a 7 the dealer would say the player turned his bets off but didn't get to put the button on his chips. I believe a few dealers vanished from working there after that as well.
Being on night shift and not much to do, I ran this strat the way Alex played it (before I read that you switch when you hit) in a sim at 10 rounds of 30 spins each with the highest bet hit in each round.
Round 1 - 34 Spins +890 Highest bet= 1300 (forgot to stop at 30)
Round 2 - 30 Spins +500 Highest bet= 500
Round 3 - 30 Spins +520 Highest bet= 500
Round 4 - 30 Spins +480 Highest bet= 500
Round 5 - 30 Spins +690 Highest bet= 500
Round 6 - 29 Spins -4580 Highest bet= 3000
Round 7 - 30 Spins +270 Highest bet= 60
Round 8 - 30 Spins +1140 Highest bet= 3000
Round 9 - 29 Spins -4900 Highest bet= 3000
Round 10 - 30 Spins +390 Highest bet= 180
Going to take a break for a bit then try it again with switching the hi/lo after the hit
do you have spin depth for wins?
Here's the results for the same as above, but switching hi/lo after the hit.
Round 1 - 30 Spins +2460 Highest bet= 3000
Round 2 - 7 Spins -5070 Highest bet= 3000
Round 3 - 30 Spins +350 Highest bet= 180
Round 4 - 30 Spins +760 Highest bet= 1300
Round 5 - 30 Spins +500 Highest bet= 500
Round 6 - 30 Spins +910 Highest bet= 500
Round 7 - 30 Spins +730 Highest bet= 1300
Round 8 - 30 Spins +330 Highest bet= 60
Round 9 - 13 Spins -5020 Highest bet= 3000
Round 10 - 30 Spins +270 Highest bet= 180
@@rob0matic can you explain what that means?
@@BomberR6 looks like basically in both trials of 10, he won something 8 times, but lost big on round 6 and 9 on the first run (-4580, -4900) and round 2 and 9 on the second run (-5070, -5020). All of the big losses would have wiped out any winnings he had and then some. He would have lost overall 4600 on the first run and 3780 on the second run.
@@BomberR6 its the breakdown of when winning spin occurs.
Alex and David can you guys play this again? Who else wants to see this done again?
Love to see this AGAIN!!!
Yes but without all the nonsense banter between the two
Redo this video
can you guys organize your video categories by like how you think the rating system is. eggplant peach plum ect.. would be easier for us to find the best videos to watch
Very interesting! That would be very dope if they can make individual playlist for each category
Bad idea... No one would watch the lower score videos
This would make them lose potential views as because people will have to click more videos to find the better ratings!
@@etblok9359 false! the eggplant vids are the absolute funniest ones. We all might have originally came for the grapefruits, but we all end up staying to watch daddy david and alex DONK! ;)
@@SpliFFFFFFF Thanks for this comment! I have new material to catch up on now 👍
Funny thing is I've always played like this since the day I started lol. I don't always martingale and I don't always bet on the same thing, but it's basically this, 2 dozens or 2 columns
Can we get a longer video. I like this strat
My real longer video for you: This strategy was working for me, until 13 low numbers were hit in a row :) I went broke
The strategy is simple but intriguing but I'm basically 99 percent certain that it wouldn't hold up long-term. Short-term you could have some big wins on some nights in the casino but long-term I think the losses would wipe out the gains.
The biggest issue here is that there is only room for 7 betting progressions, which just isn't enough. Losing 7 times in a row on 1:1 happens more often than you might think and will destroy this strategy. I ran an admittedly quick test using a free online roulette game and, playing this system through 10 sessions, I went bust for 3 of those sessions. Those 3 sessions going bust were more than enough to wipe out the 7 sessions where I won really good money. I expect that this system would go bust maybe 20 to 25 percent of the time with only 7 betting progressions and taking a big loss even 20 percent of the time would wipe out the 80 percent of the nights where you made money. If this system allowed for say 11 betting progressions, then it could be viable but 11 betting progressions with this strategy wouldn't be realistic because the bets at the end of the progression would be too large for 99.9 percent of the population to make and plenty of casinos wouldn't allow bets that large either.
Yet it's impossible to win if you bet on every spin. Thus after a loss bet only in your mind. Do it again and take another loss. Third time start the loss system. If you only are betting a color or a section paying 1:1 it could be difficult. Yet if betting col's the ball fall must now be more random than many reds or blacks or 18 below or 19 or above. Col's IMO offer more chances long term in any system. Plus bet the Zero's as a percentage of a high col. bet. Now the table is cut down to 3 col's. & 2 green slots. Betting 2 col. & greens means only 1 col is against you.
Yes... I've studied roulette a lot of have worked out why ALMOST every system is bound to fail. So with this one it's about 128 to 1 chance of that combo coming up eventually. One morning I rocked up at a casino and I saw the previous night 10 10 10 appeared on the table next to me. Ironically my first 3 spins was 10 10 10. That's like 36 000 to 1 happening twice. I did win a bit, but I didn't realize until it happened. So you are correct. The key is understanding why...
Here's my simple method. Say 4 blacks in a row is 16 to 1 chance of appearing. Az you say it happens. Find 2 tables that in 10 spins have had a high concentration of blacks and then do a progression bet on reds and ZERO on table 3. This is a simple one that doesn't take too much brain power. Also you can mix up the combo's. But like my 10 10 10... You will hit that wall at some point...
@@bretth4988 It's kinda sad you ''studied'' this game and never realized there is no way to beat it. It's very simple and straightforward maths.
No system holds up long term… not a single one 😢
Can you guys play this again please only longer, I like the system.
Agreed. Potential here.
its actually pretty good, I used it on online games with more money and its work just fine with big hits too, but if you are unlucky ( like fail 4 times or more) and dont have enough money to keep adding up for profit then its not worth it.
@@octaviosalvatierra1389 follow my tricks
It's 100% shite
This strategy was working for me, until 13 low numbers were hit in a row :) I went broke
1:29 "find a table with like a $3,000 limit" Yea, that's the problem. The casinos have caught-on to martinagle systems and have lowered the limits as a result. I recently saw a $10 table with a $200 limit. So on this system that would be $10, $30, $90, and you're screwed.
There is a electronic table in the Venetian hotel in Las Vegas that has a $3000 total bet limit.
The casinos laugh at these shite system so stop being deluded
Pretty sure the $200 limit you saw was for the inside on a single number. Even the lower tier casinos have a 5K limit on the outside. Most of Vegas has 10K maxes. Tables maxes on roulette tables refer to inside not outside.
Casinos didn't "catch on" to martingale lol. They love it. They win in the long run.
@@classiccountryrevival8563 exactly. the only way the casino loses when someone uses martingale is if the player has as big a bankroll as the casino 😂
Thanks for this system - 100% recommended - My BUY-IN was $280 AND CASHED OUT $2500
Was in Vegas a few weeks ago and the wheel did not hit 19-36 19 straight spins…I couldn’t believe it, but saw it with my own eyes…
It done me a few times where it didn't hit my group something like 25 times. For me this strategy doesn't work. And I've even modified it where I only start betting once it didn't land on a specific group 7 times. And still sooner or later, the amount I needed to bet was more than the casino's limit and I lost big.
In that case, perhaps should put it 1-18?
For double zero. Odds of hitting the same color in a row. So reverse it for the loss. This strat gives you 6 shots. 98.87% chance to win.
Number of Spins Ratio Percentage
1 1.11 to 1 47.4%
2 3.45 to 1 22.4%
3 8.41 to 1 10.6%
4 18.9 to 1 5.04%
5 40.9 to 1 2.39%
6 87.5 to 1 1.13%
7 186 to 1 0.54%
8 394 to 1 0.25%
9 832 to 1 0.12%
10 1,757 to 1 0.057%
15 73,732 to 1 0.0014%
20 3,091,873 to 1 0.000032%
Tell David he can’t complain about buying in for 5K for only $10 action and then complain when, 4-5 spins later he’s got $720 in action.
Please do the research I want to see a longer video on this!!
Great system, however I got dangerously close to my limit at times. I've found that a modified martingale version works well by doubling your prior bet but increasing by 10 when you get past 20 then increasing by 20 when you pass 200 then increasing by 40 when you pass 1000 and so on. E.g. 10, 20, 50, 110, 240, 500, 1040.
i like your martingale system, it lets you start with 4000ish and gives you 1 more spin 8 total over this guys 7, im not as risk adverse, so this one sits more comofortably.
would it not be 230 instead of 240?
This strategy was working for me, until 13 low numbers were hit in a row :) I went broke
@@mfadijber4351 I would probably be sick if I lost $5,100 in one night playing roulette.
Look at you buddy counter
1:58
3:24
6:20
8:16
We love Daddy D
Alex and David should tag team this system at a casino to see if they get kicked out for having an advantage.
I doubt they will be kicked out as no system can give them an advantage.
If they get kicked out they will lose well known players that fans want to be around and the casino's would lose even more money $$$
This system is absolutely cracked. The key is alternating the 1-18 and 19-36 after every win. With 5k buy in, you can survive the inevitable 6-7 bullets and still come out on top
if you eat the 6th bullet. you reset back to $10. restart and cut your losses.
why is important to alternate the 1-18 and the 19-36 bro? I use this system and its good but its make sense to me to keep riding the same numbers until it hits, though sometimes i got unlucky and fail like 4 times jaja
Tried this. Genius. Key is stopping at lv6
Then repeat this to infinity
When u eat the 6th bullet and lose. Restart back at the same side u lost at
09:20 Alex won $60 here, not $80.
Betting progression is 10, 20, 60, 180, 500, 1300, 3000? That doesn't seem right...Aren't you just tripling each bet after 20 (540, 1620, 4860)?
No, you're doubling your losses and not tripling your bets:
"so bet 10 and lose we are -10, so we bet 20 and lose we are -30, so now my next bet is 60 and we lose we are -90, next bet 180 and we lose we are -270, from this point on we dont exactly do double losses but we get close, bet 500 and we lose we are -770, bet 1300 and we lose we are -2070, at this point you are broken, scared and down to your last 3000, you slap it all on in my experience over the last 2 years i have gotten to this point and lost this bet 4 times, but have won this bet more than i care to remember."
@@redbirdsjunkie My point is that if you "Double your losses", you're just 3x-ing your last lost bet. The $60 and $180 bets are consistent with this, but the following bets are not. If you were to double your loss after the $180 bet, you'd bet 2 x (180+60+20+10), which is $540...which is 3x180. I'm saying that the whole "Double Your Loss Martingale" title is not accurate, because the $500, $1300, and $3000 bets aren't following this progression.
It works if you want to bankroll. Use the electronic tables so its alot faster
I don't understand the math, how did David come to a 720 or so bet at 5:10?
Isn't the betting system:
10
20
60
180
540
1620
4860?
David started-with a starting bet of $15.00. Alex’s starting bet was $10.00.
I think even money MG Lover would work with this progression as well. Black, Even, and Big. Run them as separate bets. Regress on wins. It worked for me so far.
dude you guys are funny af.. love watching you guys.
This is wack. 8 in a row happens way more often then you think. I've been wacked. Playing 2 dozens and I seen it go same dozen 12 tines in a row. My triple martingale on two dozens wrecked me. It's all good till that streak is against you!
Ive seen 19 1st dozens in a row. The key is to use table streaks against itself
Streaks mean nothing for the odds. The outcome of a spin is independent of previous spins. When I was last in a casino they even gave you paper and pencil to keep history if spins. The casino knows that this does provide any advantage to the players
@@craigalexander9421 Wrong, the whole game of roulette is based on streaks. This is how I make my money just over 2 years already, full time. What you say has zero influence on anything and any fish knows what you afe saying. The focus is on streaks and probability
@@ruanoosthuysen5002 Probability is why in the long you are more likely to use. With every bet the odds are in the favour of the casino. Also a streak of reds does not mean a black is more likely
@@craigalexander9421 What you are saying is correct for small samples of spins. However, if we assume that the wheel is fair and each trial is independent (which I assume you are), then a sample of spins should tend toward the same distribution over large sample sizes and for many trials.
For instance, say you have a fair coin and take a several samples of 100 flips. In most of them, we would expect to see close to 50 Heads and 50 Tails within a certain range. This is because we expect a binomial distribution. We know that statistically a sample with 100 Heads is less likely than one with 99, 98, 97, ... , 50 etc. So while each independent flip may be independent and the probability the same, if we are assuming a fair coin, it is likely that given a large enough amount of samples, the results will average to approximately 50 heads and 50 tails.
This is how we can use statistics for testing samples to verify that a product meets standards. In this way, if one defines an appropriate sample size with the null hypothesis that all outcomes are equally likely, one can predict whether a certain combination of flips is more likely to be observed.
While this method cannot be used to predict the result of a coin flip it can be used to decide whether to guess heads or tails more reliably than simple guesswork because we know the coin is fair.
With roulette, the concept is similar if we assume the wheel is fair since any 1:1 bet has probability 18/38, the other one 18/38, and 0-00 has 2/38. We can then keep track of the outcomes like a coin as if we are taking a sample that we know the makeup of. We can then test our null hypothesis that all outcomes are equally likely with a sufficient sample size, say 76 spins and on average we will expect roughly 36 spins of one 1:1, 36 of the other, and 4 of 0-00. If we keep a running total of the outcomes similar to card counting we can then slightly improve our guesses near the end of the sample if it is one sided.
For instance, if we have our sample size of 76, and we are on spin 70 with Red = 44, 0-00 = 6, Black = 20, we might choose to guess that black is more likely since a more representative sample is more likely.
David: those balls are just flying in your face dude..... Alex Face:😳 LOL
This one isn’t even 6 pm for me, it’s 5:30 lol
This is a recipe for a BLOOD BATH! WHAT?😳😳😳
Not at 10 or 25 a bullet. I play lots of roulette and systems, pretty rare When I have something hit 7-9 times continuous. 5K buy in, with 10-25 bullet? Nah, this is pretty decent.
Obviously every strategy in roulette is not in our favor, but I would like to see them alternate no matter win or loss, most people on here keep saying they have seen a color or section hit for way too many in a row. If you alternate you win or lose you won’t ever bust on long streaks, only by truly having really terrible luck lol.
RBRBRBRB is a streak the same as RRRRRRRR or BBBBBBBB.
Starting to enjoy roulette because of your videos. Can I actually buy a used complete roulette take to practice?
Hmm yes do more "research", Alex. How to make it more a grapefruit system, or close to it. Play it next future videos. Would be interesting to see what you come up with. Thanks!
Now that you had more time how is this working out?
David: "Research, who needs research???" 🤑
Make no mistake there is no version of the martingale system that will give you an advantage over the house
"The balls are flying in your face" - makes a face lmao
Played this last night using $1 on the ETG... and less than a minute a spin, I was making $60/hour. You dont lose! Play for hours and double up every hour, play with house money. 2nd hour, play $2/hour, then 3rd hour play $5 for the next hour... come out a WINNER!
If lose one round do you use Martingale ?
All bets in roulette have a casino advantage of 5.26% except for the five number bet on 0, 00, 1, 2, 3 that has a casino advantage of 7.89%. The RUclips videos by CEG Dealer school imply that their "systems" can beat roulette but in reality in the long term, their systems don't improve your odds at all. This could mislead people into losing thousands of dollars.
I do a system similar to this, but on baccarat
I read about a system like this about 10 years ago as a way to beat online casinos. It was mentioned to keep payouts low to avoid raising flags as most places would ban you for this style of betting.
Nobody is banning anybody for a roulette system!
You have to keep your bets low because of table limits. If you start at a $100 bet, you get only like 6 bullets. If you start with $10, you should get about 10 bullets. And like the comment above. Nobody is kicking you out for winning a chance game where the house has the edge.
Do this progression but on a dozen and a column. Can probably hit a win goal fast af
You won once does not mean you win every time. When I always hear people tells me roulette strategy which is Martingale, I will laugh it out loud. By losing 12 - 13 rounds straight is so common in roulette. You will feel the pain once you are in that shoe.
Un sistema debe permanecer + tras 10k giros para empezar a considerarlo jugable.
I am having a hard time understanding this math man. Is there a link to a chart that can show us
I’m trying it I will re check in in the summer when I set aside the funds
This content had m😂😂😂😂 love the channel !
Mark out the wheels real-estate. You will see why 19-36 is best. Evenly spaced around the whole wheel. There's the key ingredient...slayers!
After crunching some numbers you end up at -$1000 EV since you bust every 90 systems and win only $4000 after 90 systems of survival. If each system was around 2 bets, I don't think you would make up the difference in discounted drinks and comps. Surprised this person made 40k his positive variance is through the roof!
its actually pretty good, I used it on online games with more money and its work just fine with big hits too, but if you are unlucky( like fail 4 times or more) and dont have enough money to keep adding up for profit then its not worth it.
So the dude won on 4,000 roulette spins to make 40K at $10 start strategy. Lets say he wins 66% of all the spins he plays, making his total spin counter 6,000. It takes around 2 minutes to clear table, take bets, close bets and pay bets, etc... My dude played 12,000 minutes of roulette which equates to 200 hours or 8.3 days of non stop roulette. And he said he goes to the casino only 4 times a year to make 40K. Something doesn't line up, either the guy just wanted to look cool by showing he knows how to win money with the most time consuming method or he has no idea how Martingale strategy works (at the end of every win, you make your min bet as profit).... I call bs on the 40k winnings.
He said in a post here, he usually cashes at $500-$1k and walks and comes back later and sometimes he makes the whole $5k in one sitting. It's not just $10 wins every spin, you have to figure in the profit if say he martingales to the higher levels. The wins get bigger. So it's not 4,000 spins.
No matter the system, the dealer can land the ball anywhere from 3 to 5 spaces. If you win more than 4 times, watch the dealer. If he doesn't make eye contact with you before the spin and looks down, he will be trying to place the ball so you will lose. 75% of communication is non-verbal. Use every aspect you can to win. Same as poker.
More research is required. Maybe try simulations using random number generator. The stake list only allows each player 8 events of consecutive losses.
I see 11 to 20 in a row of a sequence on a daily basis though. Ifbyou think you can just random bet and MG, goodluck, you will be broke before dinner. They key is to wait
2:00 look at you buddy ;)
Bet placed at 6:43 is the most accurate portrayal of a casino experience I've probably ever seen. :)
I've played variations of this system for years. One day I was playing red... It came black 11 times in a row. Cooler.
I love the SDV music i noticed it immediately idk why
New martingale on blackjack table.. Let’s try it!!!😅
You can also do this black/red, we call this escalera in our country. I dont know if i spelled it rifhf. But you just gonna double your lost. Like its just be so bad losing 7x. If youre betting high.
Last week at the casino, I did outside bets to start and no joke 11 times in a row came the other way. I lost a lot of money.
Any recommendations for live online roulette sites??
This how I play too. Works but gotta have a big bankroll or you get rolled
Shrooms! Yes! 😂 my dude David !
On the risk vs reward double ur loss martingale,,,,,, you mention startin with 10 and if you lose ,, you state the increments as 10 20 60 180 500 1300 …… how is the bet increments go from 180 to 500 if your doubling your loss,,,, plz clarify
I've never liked the MG system. Too easy to reach table limit and lose all. I devised my own system years ago ( now copyrighted) that plays specific numbers straight up. With a "gentle" progression of bets, I walk away winner nearly every time.
key word, nearly!
Copyrighted his own system…😂
i can see this strat going pear shaped real quick
I do the same thing except when I double I add an extra unit.
can u eplxane please how exactly goest the progression on the bet ?
I love it! Flavor is good
I want a follow up on this system please
One day im gonna teach my roulette strategy never lost doing it its a few things I don't see ppl do ever or speak about
Love this system! Thank you for this video! Its a keeper. Double Loss Martingale! 👍👏🏻P.S. Is there a Name, for this betting SEQUENCE?
Who's going to tell Timmy? He'll be so excited!
I have a strategy I’ve been kinda making up maybe you’d like to try it and see if it’s cool.
Bet X amount on two of the three 12’s that pay 3:1. (Ex. $25 on 1-12 and $25 on 13-24) it has the be the same amount on both. Then bet 1/5 the size of X amount on 4 numbers that are NOT within those 24 paying numbers. (Ex. $5 on 30,33,35,36 or you could throw a 5 on a 0 if you please). Basically this makes it so 1-24 will profit you $5 and if one of the 4 other numbers hit you profit $105, all off a $70 bet. So 10 numbers will bust your bet but the other 28 will make you some money. Adjust bets according to budget- and it’s very slow and not aggressive so you’ll lose money slower!
I’ve also played around with putting those 4 numbers within the 24 range and that would profit you an extra X amount bet if hit but also lower your spread on the board. I’ve been tweakin it but maybe you have some suggestions too or would like to try it for a video.
Thanks!
Maybe put a little more on the dozens so you dont just risk 70 to win 5
The double your loss martingale makes a lot of sense. If you are going to risk a large amount why not have it equal a large profit.
Nik S. Approved. I actually do this on Baccarat. Only real way to make money on even money bets.
Double-Zero is far too high (5.26% house edge). Even money games like Baccarat, yup. Not at this game for sure.
@Jason Bourne that's why you got to be happy that big hit and bounce. David got the whooper hit and stayed ahead the rest of the way. Alex had fewer donks but made less money because of it. House edge is what it is. If you play roulette you have to live with it.
Who couldn’t use $40,000?
if you believe it. If you have a 5000 spin database, check it. Doesn't add up.
I won nearly half a mil in bitcoin and it was much easier than this garbage not to say I couldn't of lost but these casino house games are trash you're a fool if you play plain and simple.
what will happen if we bet 0 and double are bet after every 30 losses?
at win we reset to 1 unit ?
please try this strategy
davids actually playing the system though so he should be loving it lmao the system where losing is winning to a point
Any casino worker will tell you he'll see a 50/50 box lose 10 times in a row a few times a day
seen twice 27 times red / 16 times player on baccarat - vegas was built by losers
Lots of times a day
Casinos love this system more certain you are to lose.The the longer you sit down the more you will lose most especially when sitting at a wheel with 2 greens. This system has been around for decades and the Casinos love it these suckers think they have an unbeatable system but seriously these RUclipsrs should warn people.
The problems are simple to point out
1/ You cannot keep doubling down sooner or later you will hit the table limit.
2/ This method requires a win obviously however if you get 8 reds in a row the odds of a black coming up are exactly the same. The table does not remember anything. Now due to human Psychology we are pattern seeking animals so we do not believe this. The odds against such a sequence can be hundreds to one or thousands. But the system requires you to play a large amount of hands. Eventually you will be in such a sequence and lose thousands.
Start higher, $100.
Double the bet, add the base.
100, 300, 700, 1500
$2600 buy in.
Called Pelonski.
20 - 10 = 10 . You're not doubling anything , Man . Thats why my numbers are 10 , 40 , 120 on a 10 system . Start low as possible . I do 0.50 until i find a cheaper option somewhere .
40 - 10 = 30 - 10 = Gain of 20 .
120 - 50 = 70 - 30 = Gain of 40 .
etc .
The numbers in the video more reflect a 5 starter system . Numbers are 5 , 20 , 60 , 160 , 400 , 960 , etc . Very close to a 0.50 , 2 , 6 , 16 , 40 , 96 , 192 , 448 , 1024 , etc system . Numbers are a little off though . Think it through . Numbers are fun .
I'd like to see you guys try this more.
I need to see this play out a little longer
it doesnt end well lmao.
What’s the progression steps??
Pretty sure double would be 10, 30, 90, 270, 540, 1080, 2160, 4520. Or what am I missing
This is correct its just a triple martingale
Could you explain the betting chip amounts... 10 then 20 then what ?
Pls give the sheet
Its a good system for short term gains
the guy with the hat sounds identical to Mark Normand
Hello, I'm new to the channel. How do these systems work on the Roulette machines?
This an amazing betting strategy. However, I would begin the progression on 2 losses to extend betting rounds. For instance if there were 2 reds in a row start 3rd on black.
I'm a dealer of 20 years. Please nobody bet this way. The system itself is whack. Also, most roulette wheels are triple zero nowadays also. Happens against very frequently. You'll go bust as your raising your bets way too much.
this is GAMBLING. dont bet what you cannot afford to lose.
So what’s your suggestion?
Note out of the 9 spins ... 6 were in col 1. 3 were in col. 3. What would you have made if you had played only those 2 cols each time?
$90 with no loses.
What would happen if he played only col. 2? 😅