Lambert on a single dozen is still my favorite. I run a variation that takes it in 30 spin segments. Get 3 spins with no bet. Choose the dozen that didn’t hit (or get more spins until 1 dozen hasn’t hit in 3 spins). Start betting 1 unit on that dozen and mark it as the 4th spin out of 30. The 3 dead spins keep you from losing 3 out of the expected 20-21 losses over 30 spins. House edge disappears this way. You go from 31.5% expected win rate over 30 spins to $35.1% over the same 30 spins.
Im waiting with excitement for a D'Lambert Lover video now. I want to see smoke coming out of Alex's ears remembering all 6 2:1 bets and david laughing the whole video flat betting the zero having the hole finder work with marksman precision.😂
I did about 12k in 3 weeks on red or black and sometimes also betting on the 12s. R/B I'll do 300$-600$ a spin and 100$-200$ on the 12s. Short stays at the table. Hit and run. Walked at 700$ to 4300$.
Shouldn't each player's two bets move together in the Lambert system? Meaning if Alex is on the 2nd and 3rd dozen with $100 each and one of them hits, they should both come down to $75 (rather than one down to $75, the other up to $125). Otherwise, you're guaranteed to increase at least one of those bets after every spin, and sometimes (33% of the time) increase both... You'd never get down to 1st level again.
I did a quick run of units and if you did it this way and say you lost 4 in a row, then hit on the 5th so betting 5 units. Then hit over and over back down to one. When you hit the 1 unit, you would still be down 5 units total.
The point isn't to get back to level 1. It is to hit at the higher levels. If I remember right, the system they are talking about was when you were up $100, you then start over. When using $5 units. Someone posted the table and how many units you are winning at each level on another video, but as Alex said it's about hitting the dozen twice in a row or close to it.. they never reset in this strategy.
@@Hornettt21 No I wasn't implying a reset after 1 hit, just moving both bets the same way, so that if you win X in a row you'll eventually get back to first level.
If yall would have reset after each hit yall would have done as good as we did lol I hadn’t tried De Lambert with this, but now I know it would be bad… we did Martingale and turned $5k to $15k on a single 0 table. When the common dozen hits, it’s pure profit
I believe that "Lambert" is a reference to "d'Lembert" a french mathematician. Wikipedia has a reasonable article on him. I'm looking forward to some live streams.
The only 1 strategy to win roulette is don't play it.... U maybe can win once or Twice but if u consistent playing roulette....in the long run u Will bankrupt...u cannot win casino's money...if u win that is other people losing money not the casino's money....remember the house always win
For someone who hates Mitchell so bad, you sure don’t know much about how he plays. He doesn’t play just one dozen, he plays two. It’s a triple martingale minimum(He 4x’s). You have to bet within a bankroll for 4 3x bets, after the second dozen has hit twice. Based solely on the numbers that came up today you’d have been up over $2K using his system. And you have only bet twice. He has other rules, such as walk away limits and bet amounts based on your bankroll. He personally earns 10%, he makes for certain we only aim for 3%. Now do I think we need to pay him $5K to learn all this… No Would I pay him $5K just to thank him for a functional, regular money making MENTALITY after the fact, yes.
You guys shouldn’t even mention Christopher B1tchell… I mean Mitchell lol. He always says the way to win is to “have no fear and keep Mitchellgale betting” and to go the the right website to play which he gives a link… the link is an affiliate link. He gets paid for every chump that goes to the website via his link. Dude is a complete scam artist. Preying on people without common sense.
If you're playing lambert on two dozens then id split the bet when it goes past level 8 or 10. Lambert looses when you miss 5 or 6 in a row and then miss another 5 to 6 which happens a lot. Doing this will allow more levels. Say instead of 100 on 2nd and 300 on 3rd it would become 200 on each. Can split multiple times till in profit ,, rare you would ever go back down to one unit again
I thought that too. I ran simulations and like 90% of the time you wound up losing slightly less in the worst case but win much less than you would keeping with the system for 2 dozens. That being said, I still prefer doing this on one dozen.
You should move your bets to the 2 "hottest" dozens before each spin. That way you would've avoided the "cold" 3rd dozen. After 99 spins, there is an extremely low chance each dozen will have hit exactly 33 times apiece. Bet the dozens that are hitting, and give yourself a slightly better chance for profit.
@@JakeM25 I know. But look back at any previous 99 spins, and you'll see that it is RARELY if ever exactly 33 hits on each dozen. One will almost always have 35-40 hits, and one will have 25-30 hits... it's just the way it is. So, you may have a slightly better outcome by betting on the ones that are the "hottest" at the moment. No one is saying you're going to break the bank.
CHEQUES VS CHIPS The terms “Chips” and “Cheques” are both referring to a small round clay disc. The term “Chip” is used when that clay disc has no monetary value. The term “Cheque” is used when that clay disc does have monetary value. An easy way you could remember it is “Chip” means its worthless while “Cheque” means it has monetary value.
I have success with that betting system by starting on the first dozen and move to the next dozen after a hit no matter what the bet is. When I get to a profit then start over betting one unit.
After each hit of the dozen. Yep I’ve got as high as 16 in a row after starting at 1.00 on a dozen. But stayed on the that dozen until I hit it or ran out of money. But I don’t stick around long enough to hit that losing streak. I have a very low profit goal. Usually 25.00 to 50.00 then I walk.@@alansolomon2863
I honestly think it's a better idea to keep both of your bets even. Case in point, the third dozen refused to hit multiple times. However, if you would have retracted both bets every time the second dozen hit, it would have been a lot safer and you might have had a little more profit.
Happens all the time. That's why I play the 2 "hottest" dozens when I play this strategy. Move your bets to the last 2 dozens that hit, so you're never betting the "cold" dozen.
Jean Le Rond d'Alembert aurait bien rigolé de vous voir jouer sur une roulette à 38 numéros..🤣🤣..Etre américain ne vous interdit pas de réfléchir un tant soit peu..😅😋
Way to talk over each other as you are counting up your totals. The last thing we hear is David clearly saying his totals and then he says I am up 1,250. And then you both talk over each other saying numners and Alex is saying 45 and then says 450 as David is talking saying we need 5,000 and then fist bump. It's just too much, too confusing, especially if you are just listening and not watching. Just sayin'
This is an absolutely ridiculous system… I am thoroughly convinced that you are playing the tag team part incorrectly, but even still. The best you can do is make up for each other’s losses. It’s exactly the same as playing all three dozens.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Need a running total on screen!!!!
That would be amazing
Where
Yes plz
This has been asked for by so many so many times. But nothing.
Lambert on a single dozen is still my favorite. I run a variation that takes it in 30 spin segments. Get 3 spins with no bet. Choose the dozen that didn’t hit (or get more spins until 1 dozen hasn’t hit in 3 spins). Start betting 1 unit on that dozen and mark it as the 4th spin out of 30. The 3 dead spins keep you from losing 3 out of the expected 20-21 losses over 30 spins. House edge disappears this way. You go from 31.5% expected win rate over 30 spins to $35.1% over the same 30 spins.
The “lets not overcomplicate things” to the “but he’s losing double” made me cackle
Im waiting with excitement for a D'Lambert Lover video now.
I want to see smoke coming out of Alex's ears remembering all 6 2:1 bets and david laughing the whole video flat betting the zero having the hole finder work with marksman precision.😂
im starting to think tag team systems are the only real way to win at roulette ... everytime you guys do it ... its positive money
Can you add a constant running total somewhere and the series of numbers? Would be much easier to follow
I did about 12k in 3 weeks on red or black and sometimes also betting on the 12s. R/B I'll do 300$-600$ a spin and 100$-200$ on the 12s. Short stays at the table. Hit and run. Walked at 700$ to 4300$.
Can you please get 6 people to fibonacci a dozen or collom each and see the results as a collective team
So with a buddy system, at the end do you put the money together and split it?
If you are buying in together as a team, yes.
What do you THINK...??? Unless your buddy is a n idiot, good luck just saying "Thanks for helping ME win all this money!"
merry christmas and a happy new year!
This is interesting, can we see more two player strategies??
Ditto!
Also I would love to see three people run this, one on each dozen
Shouldn't each player's two bets move together in the Lambert system? Meaning if Alex is on the 2nd and 3rd dozen with $100 each and one of them hits, they should both come down to $75 (rather than one down to $75, the other up to $125). Otherwise, you're guaranteed to increase at least one of those bets after every spin, and sometimes (33% of the time) increase both... You'd never get down to 1st level again.
I did a quick run of units and if you did it this way and say you lost 4 in a row, then hit on the 5th so betting 5 units. Then hit over and over back down to one. When you hit the 1 unit, you would still be down 5 units total.
The point isn't to get back to level 1. It is to hit at the higher levels. If I remember right, the system they are talking about was when you were up $100, you then start over. When using $5 units. Someone posted the table and how many units you are winning at each level on another video, but as Alex said it's about hitting the dozen twice in a row or close to it.. they never reset in this strategy.
Yeah they didn’t reset after a hit was the downfall
@dustinryanmusic423 you don't want to reset after 1 hit with this system. I recommend you watch the DD system they link in this video.
@@Hornettt21 No I wasn't implying a reset after 1 hit, just moving both bets the same way, so that if you win X in a row you'll eventually get back to first level.
As they both were playing middle dozen, why wouldn't their bets on middle dozen always be the same?
If yall would have reset after each hit yall would have done as good as we did lol
I hadn’t tried De Lambert with this, but now I know it would be bad… we did Martingale and turned $5k to $15k on a single 0 table. When the common dozen hits, it’s pure profit
I believe that "Lambert" is a reference to "d'Lembert" a french mathematician. Wikipedia has a reasonable article on him. I'm looking forward to some live streams.
No one in Vegas even knows who the GOAT is 😂
They will learn soon enough 😅
I know who it is NOT..... me.
That guy is arguably the biggest clown I have ever seen on the internet
Like it or not the clown is making tons of money on the Internet n crypto
Alex got hammered badly. You made $450 in twenty minutes.
Both have a bit of luck, peach to grapefruit.
When is the official KJ holiday?
I play the same system but I treat each dozen bet as a seperate bet and Fibonacci the bets accordingly. Works nicely
The only 1 strategy to win roulette is don't play it....
U maybe can win once or Twice but if u consistent playing roulette....in the long run u Will bankrupt...u cannot win casino's money...if u win that is other people losing money not the casino's money....remember the house always win
For someone who hates Mitchell so bad, you sure don’t know much about how he plays.
He doesn’t play just one dozen, he plays two. It’s a triple martingale minimum(He 4x’s). You have to bet within a bankroll for 4 3x bets, after the second dozen has hit twice. Based solely on the numbers that came up today you’d have been up over $2K using his system. And you have only bet twice.
He has other rules, such as walk away limits and bet amounts based on your bankroll.
He personally earns 10%, he makes for certain we only aim for 3%.
Now do I think we need to pay him $5K to learn all this… No
Would I pay him $5K just to thank him for a functional, regular money making MENTALITY after the fact, yes.
I love this. If I could tweak this method I’d martin Gail my losses on red or black with my buddy we each have one color
Is the music in the background from dark cloud on PlayStation?
I use a modified version of this system I created but I do Fibonacci & it can be played alone
You guys shouldn’t even mention Christopher B1tchell… I mean Mitchell lol. He always says the way to win is to “have no fear and keep Mitchellgale betting” and to go the the right website to play which he gives a link… the link is an affiliate link. He gets paid for every chump that goes to the website via his link. Dude is a complete scam artist. Preying on people without common sense.
Well said.
If you're playing lambert on two dozens then id split the bet when it goes past level 8 or 10. Lambert looses when you miss 5 or 6 in a row and then miss another 5 to 6 which happens a lot. Doing this will allow more levels. Say instead of 100 on 2nd and 300 on 3rd it would become 200 on each. Can split multiple times till in profit ,, rare you would ever go back down to one unit again
I thought that too. I ran simulations and like 90% of the time you wound up losing slightly less in the worst case but win much less than you would keeping with the system for 2 dozens. That being said, I still prefer doing this on one dozen.
One of you should have did 2 columns instead.
Curious when Lambert was created cause I’ve been doing this strat since around 2007
This is a pretty cool system. Just the way they did it. 1 good run and that’s way more than 9% return.
You guys are great
How do I submit a strategy???
Up and down 1 unit on each as a pair. Yes, half pay, but not getting screwed on one large losing bet.
I think this would be easy on electronic. Just click rebet and add unit or subtract
I thought these ‘press’ systems only worked if you have a “start over” point ?? After big win on a press, go back to Start ?!?
You should move your bets to the 2 "hottest" dozens before each spin. That way you would've avoided the "cold" 3rd dozen. After 99 spins, there is an extremely low chance each dozen will have hit exactly 33 times apiece. Bet the dozens that are hitting, and give yourself a slightly better chance for profit.
Chance is the same with every spin. None have better chance
@@JakeM25 I know. But look back at any previous 99 spins, and you'll see that it is RARELY if ever exactly 33 hits on each dozen. One will almost always have 35-40 hits, and one will have 25-30 hits... it's just the way it is. So, you may have a slightly better outcome by betting on the ones that are the "hottest" at the moment. No one is saying you're going to break the bank.
Like this system. Can you guys run one with each of you on 1 dozen?! I like that. Maybe a 1500 buy in?
Friend number 14 please step up! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
And how many times did they play the system and just get hosed lol
Yes it is a person. He was from France. It's D'Alembert pro. (Dull en bear
Not good to do offset bets. Should be same on each dozen. I sometimes have better luck betting columns instead based on observing what’s hitting.
Never played roulette kinda twice. If ya have a nice little system going. Do they let you play 4-5days a week?
was that even english?
why did Alex start calling chips "checks"?
They are called checks. He's called them that for a while. Hence the expression check change when changing a higher denom chip for lower ones.
CHEQUES VS CHIPS
The terms “Chips” and “Cheques” are both referring to a small round clay disc. The term “Chip” is used when that clay disc has no monetary value. The term “Cheque” is used when that clay disc does have monetary value. An easy way you could remember it is “Chip” means its worthless while “Cheque” means it has monetary value.
I would love to see you guys tag team this playing One dozen a piece!!! That would be rad!
That would be a different system..
Two would lose and one would win which then would leave them at = unless 0 in which they all lose slowly as 0 comes
I have success with that betting system by starting on the first dozen and move to the next dozen after a hit no matter what the bet is. When I get to a profit then start over betting one unit.
U mean after each bet ?. As U see a no hit may reach 10 to 20 consecutive too often.
After each hit of the dozen. Yep I’ve got as high as 16 in a row after starting at 1.00 on a dozen. But stayed on the that dozen until I hit it or ran out of money. But I don’t stick around long enough to hit that losing streak. I have a very low profit goal. Usually 25.00 to 50.00 then I walk.@@alansolomon2863
I honestly think it's a better idea to keep both of your bets even. Case in point, the third dozen refused to hit multiple times. However, if you would have retracted both bets every time the second dozen hit, it would have been a lot safer and you might have had a little more profit.
This is insane! How could you get that many spins in the 1st 12?
Happens all the time. That's why I play the 2 "hottest" dozens when I play this strategy. Move your bets to the last 2 dozens that hit, so you're never betting the "cold" dozen.
You'll be surprised at what does happen in roulette.
If david was up $1250 and alex was down $500, shouldn't it have been +$750?
Is your wheel as calibrated as casino wheels?
I lost a 3rd 12, 15 times in a row at the MGM. Lost $500.
If you was gunna tag team this strategy you would have person on the columns
The System is good. The Stakes are too high. Buy in with 500$ and take 10$ shots
Should run this with the winner is collecting 1 unit, bet remainsthe same...., a whack pumps 1 unit or fibs.
Im willing to bet a "couple" would be kicked out of the casino for having an advantage if they played this strategy.
They would love you to play this every day. It is guaranteed money for the casino.
There is 1 to 18 chance to hit one of greens for a wack hurting both teammates.
@stevenellsworth7614 this...look what happened on spin #2
It’s “dal-lim-bear” not “de-lam-Burt”
Ty
Believe!!!
Jean Le Rond d'Alembert aurait bien rigolé de vous voir jouer sur une roulette à 38 numéros..🤣🤣..Etre américain ne vous interdit pas de réfléchir un tant soit peu..😅😋
Yeah peach :)
Let’s see it how he thinks it should be played
Way to talk over each other as you are counting up your totals. The last thing we hear is David clearly saying his totals and then he says I am up 1,250. And then you both talk over each other saying numners and Alex is saying 45 and then says 450 as David is talking saying we need 5,000 and then fist bump. It's just too much, too confusing, especially if you are just listening and not watching. Just sayin'
This is an absolutely ridiculous system… I am thoroughly convinced that you are playing the tag team part incorrectly, but even still. The best you can do is make up for each other’s losses. It’s exactly the same as playing all three dozens.
alex got bronskied
D'Aleggplant.
First degen
You know nothing about roulette😊
How many of my Christmas gift cards am i selling for half price today??
Noone gives a f#*%
@@BlueGillage u care so much you commented.... multiple times. 🫵🤡💩
we turned 5k into 15 k in one weekend. really doesn't sound that great.
I think he said they took 10k (5 each) and left with 15k total.. so only 2.5k profit