Keep in mind that this is on ultra settings when they aren’t what most people play on. Most play on medium setting or some are low and some are ultra for the best edge. This will give many many more fps so with the rtx 2060 this will be absolutely fine for 144hz gaming.
True. If I'm online in even a semi-competitive game I want frames and the game usually looks good enough. For singleplayer games I'd crank up the settings while getting less frames and be ok with it.
Rokas B haha same, but tbh i play games like fortnite, csgo, lol, r6 in low settings + streched and i got +150 200 fps running with a 2600X 16gb ram 2933 (sry for my bad English :$)
@Wojciech Szeler im mainly interested in fortnite and racing games, in fortnite i almost qualified for winter royale and other competitive events on 60hz, 144hz will really help me improve
when thinking of 144hz gaming i think of doom, csgo and generally competitive games. (Br excluded since games with that much RNG just cant be competitive. its all about who gets the best stuff in the first few minutes) So the 2060 would be perfect for that and stable 60fps would be possible with everything else it seems. Still the price, like you mentioned, is too high. + i only recently got myself a 1060 6gb and im very happy with it. 1080p 60fps is very achievable on that puppy so yeah. will be a long time till i upgrade my gpu again. great video as always^^
The GTX 1060 6Gb is one of the all time great GPUs in my opinion. I'm sure it will serve you well. :D The RTX 2060 also would have been amazing at a lower price. Thanks for the comment.
@@Solid_Snake99 Wait a second. How do you compare "old gen" to "new gen"? Are you taking consoles as a standard or PC Hardware? If so 144hz would've been the standard back in 2013 when my friend got his first 144hz panel.
Lowkas No 144hz is the standard since 2015 when gtx1000 series came out, i’m ofcourse talking about pc, console is just utterly bad. We are already switching to 240hz standard btw it just costs too much
@@Solid_Snake99 i know about 240hz but how come 144 is just "standard" since 2015 when the panels were avaiable for a decent price for much longer? And 240hz panels have been available a very long time too. well. either way. I can get my 240fps in Need for Speed Underground 1. And since most modern games dont catch my interest I'm all good. (For now. Who knows how long that'll last)
do you have some sort of vid or web link in which you discuss the optimization, just bought new pre build pc with a 10th gen i5 and the rtx 2060 since currently building your own pc is a pain and probably more expensive, anyhow so far pc runs smooth as hell but since most demanding game I have tried is street fighter V that's no real benchmark ahhaha I plan on buying some new title like cyberpunk and I am quite sure my pc will start struggling if I don't do some optimization, would be great to have some insight from someone that already done the leg work since last time I tried to thinker and optimize my gaming laptop took me ages to find the sweet spot to be able to play games and not burn my cpu.
@@morid0 Man, this guy just has a wild imagination. There is simply no way to "optimize" a graphic card unless it is at driver level.. In his imagination he has made his super computer much faster.. the reality is that he just updated his drivers and maybe ran some crappy "optimization" program that will delete your caches and not much more...Unless he is struggling with the CPU, there is no real optimization you can do. The 2060 wont make any modern cpu to struggle to give full FPS.. so... Yeah, he has updated his drivers, the rest is his very own fantasy...Yeah, you can disable half your services in windows, but as as long your GPU isnt bottlenecked already, you wont gain a single fps from this....
For the best explanations on subjects like frame times or frame pacing Battle (non)sense is the go to channel. That guy is the best when it comes to frame rate testing and input lag.
I have a 2060; If you don’t use all ultra settings, you can get a consistent 240fps easily. If i uncap my FPS, i get an average of around 400fps on fortnite.
Really enjoy your style of presenting this info, keep 'Dawiding' it -- for sure! That said... if you're talking about 144 hz monitors and by extension 144 fps gaming, you're almost invariably talking about e-sports titles; in which it is GOSPEL to run the game at mid to lower-tier settings for anyone taking the game 'seriously'. Infact, 'all low' is the consummate standard, as I'm sure you must know! Players who care about this sort of thing are also the types of players willing to do anything to hit well over 144 fps -- for instance, a CSGO player wants around 300 fps ideally and just wants a graphics card that clears well over the 144 fps minimum -- at LOW settings. :) So, I'm sure testing at Ultra (come on -- as Tech Deals says 'ultra is for screen shots only'!) creates nice tidy, demarcated benchmarks, but it's far from a real-world scenario. I think it would be more realistic and therefore useful to make this explicitly clear in the video. Sorry if you did and I missed that, but I feel as an esports player myself, this is something that gets swept aside in favour of the 'let's see what graphics this baby can do!' mentality that is mostly contained within the 60 fps/hz single-player market. I'd love to see frame-rates at settings 80% of the community will be playing on! Enjoyed the video, though!
Thank you, I really appreciate the useful information in your comment. I should have more explicitly stated that the settings are unrealistic for the that type of gaming. One of the reasons that I didnt include tests with lower settings was because of the CPU bottleneck. Like I showed in the video, when running the games at ultra settings the CPU was sitting at just under 100% utilisation. When I did the tests at low settings the FPS didn't change much (which I should have mentioned in the video). Considering that I don't have access to a better gaming CPU I though I would just mention the CPU bottleneck and that you could get better results with a better CPU. I really should have spoken about the low settings use case more in the video though. As you very correctly quoted Tech Deals ultra is just for screen shots and you shouldn't be gaming there. My conclusion was made taking that consideration into account however and that is why I still recommended the GPU for 144Hz gaming even if my testing didn't show the best results. Thank you again for this great comment. I am still learning how to make the best videos possible so I really appreciate this kind of feedback.
@@DawidDoesTechStuff Ah youtube just ate my reply, curses! I appreciate the bottleneck constraints, but I'd certainly love to see an aside along the lines of ''And for the competitive gamers, you can expect to achieve within the region of 'x' fps with 'comp' settings, which compares to the market leader achieving around 'y''', something like that, which hopefully doesn't take up too much diagnostic time or siderail the video. Also, love the choice of music. Accent is killer. Please never succumb to the allure of over-swanking (that sounds great eh) the production values to the extent that it becomes pandering to populism. Whatever makes you original will make you interesting. Just my salty grain for you there! :)
@@hoodwinky1 I will definitely keep that in mind, it is important to provide information for as many use cases as possible. Thanks for the great feedback on the video quality, I get what your saying about over-swanking. The thing is, I really enjoy the "film making" (and I know that's a ridiculous term to use in this context but I can't think of another one) aspect of making these videos. So I try to make the videos as beautiful as possible more for my own sake than anything. However I will keep that in mind.
@@DawidDoesTechStuff 'Tis always a trade-off between appeasing people and time management. Whatever makes sense for your vision, in the end! I think you're hitting a pretty good balance so far, with the occasional fast-edit sequence ;). Nah, I don't think that's ridiculous: you obviously put care into the video and it shows in the quality. Doing it for yourself or for 'it's' sake is the best reason I'd say; a beautiful thing. Looking forward to your new stuff!
@@Solid_Snake99 Yeah my i5 experiences death when more than 0 tabs are open while I play Forza lol. I still get around 80-110 fps avg. tho but with a lot of stuttering, probably 8GB isn't enough.
I know you didnt just say PUBG is a fast paced game 🤔 btw i'm a new follower to your channel. You remind me a lot of techteamGB. Great videos all around! Hope your channels blows up soon in terms of subscribers 👍🏻
The best adviuce I could ever give someone is to wait. Keep checking prices and usually assume that prices will be %10-20 cheaper during black friday/cyber monday. Barring any DDR4 price gouges. Everything but GPU's seem to be getting cheaper and if your only looking to do 60fps 1080p gaming a rx 570 or similar will be good for you. Just remmeber to get 16gb of ram and a ryzen six core! Lots of games are utilizing more than 4 cores and will bottleneck your cpu resulting in lots of frames lost. If you like me and you watch youtube or movies while gaming or would like to stream/record your gameplay your gonna need at least a six core. Fortunately they are very affordable! Thanks AMD. Now only if they would bring a 1440p 144hz gpu to market for around $400!
Or... or... you re-evaluate if you can actually see the difference between high and ultra in the games you play, probably realize you can't and then just go ahead anyway since it'll increase your framerate by an average of 20-30 in plenty of games. Not saying I would, but it's definitely something people should consider. There's quite some titles where the difference is purely in being able to say ''I run the game at ultra!''.
If 90fps isn't enough you can drop a few settings and get maybe 20-40 more. I personally stop seeing a difference after about 80-90. The 2060 is probably minimum you need these days but it's good enough.
Yeah, I didn't take Super into account here. I think you have a good point. If you forget about the naming scheme and concentrate on the performance for the dollar, the new super cards are definitely a step in the right direction.
@@DawidDoesTechStuff Mhmm. People are too fixated of 'but muh mid range card' that they fail to see how impressive the cards are. The leap is greater this generation than it was for Pascal... Although that comes with a bit higher price tag.
Jinkies m8 what does that even mean??? You cap it at 144fps so that you can reach that on competitive settings also for single players whatever that means. Basically ppl who play at 144hz dont play on high or ultra settings
Thanks for the frame rate review on all the games Like R6 and GTA, I play those games alot and used to play with average 80 frames. Im planning to get a GPU and a CPU so thanks.
My g4560 pentium and gtx 1050 can get 165fps in fortnite. Settings are View distance epic, shadows off, aa medium, textures medium, effects low, post processing, off
Lekker Channel broertjie. Doen asseblief 'n comparison tussen die RX5700 XT vs RTX 2070 SUPER as jy hulle in die hande kan kry. Sal interessant wees! Thanks!
RTX2060 in the new F1 from Code-masters does over 100fps in 1080p highest settings with old drivers. Does over 60 all the way in 1440p highest settings with Vsync
Even though RTX cards is insanely expensive I think this will be the trend for pricing in the future because manufacturing and design are getting harder to do when going to a smaller Manufacturing process i.e 14nm-12 nm -7nm ect even though the are saving money on the silicon wavers at smaller processes the difficulty drives up costs although Nvidias profit margin is greater because amd is currently not able to compete because of the approach they are taking they are a year behind nvidia on performance hopefully future iterations of navi would come to market quicker ...... You sound South African ??
Just Purchased a Msi Optix 27” 1080p @ 144hz & paired it with my Ryzen 7 3700x Plus Msi Mpg x570 + Xpg 32gb 3000 Ram + Xpg Sx8100 Mvne & Rtx 2060 8gb Super Gpu 🖥 i prefer Quality over performance ( if i have to Choose ) playing Most games at high vs ultra usually doesn’t have a noticeable image difference unless you’re really looking and you’d be Surprised how easy 144 frames can be achieved with high Compared to ultra with Very minor Visual quality 🍷 either way hopefully this helps Someone who doesn’t like Spending money on graphic cards that costs the price of the rest of their Computer Components “ like me “ 🇵🇹☠️🤬🇵🇹
Solid_Snake I hate playing max settings, not cuz of the fps. , I can still hit 60-100 on all maxed, but shadows hinder the fights, textures literally do not make any difference and anti aliasing from high to epic does nothing, I put aliasing on medium, viewing distance epic and everything low, and the game looks great. Any decent/good player at fortnite never plays in max / high settings.
Tried all RTX's and 2060 does 60fps+ 1080p in all games i tried including battlefield 5 highest settings with raytracing. Is that not good enough? Mine is a ASUS STRIX only get up 60 degrees celsius and are really quit. Also overclocks to over 2100mhz and is still really quit. Almost does as good as GTX1080 just not in 4k because of the 6Gb ram. But the new SUPER's should be faster than GTX1080 according to my calculations. That is pretty good i think. And ALSO does raytracing. Because without they are still the fastest graphic card's. A 2060 almost beating an 1080 when did that happen last? The GTX1060 could not beat the 980 anyways. And still people pay much more for the old series?
Did you try testing the card with no intake fans, to try and make use of the H500 negative pressure benefits? Also I'm quite surprised how cool the Zotac card is O_O There are actually rumors around here abt how hot Zotac cards are. Thanks for the vid Dawid!
i am super late to this vid but if you don't care about the quality of the picture, paring an i7 with the 2060 and putting the settings to low is a good way to go.
I'm surprised you're not at 10k man. You've got alot going for you, I hope you get some money and review Ryzen 3000 CPU as that will almost certainly give you good traffic. Keep it up tho!
I have a 1660Ti and I play Overwatch on 144hz without any problems whatsoever. Capped frames at 144 and it stays that way. Of course, it sometimes drops to 139 when there is too much shit going on but it isn't noticable. Edit: Settings to low of course, but I'd do that even if I had an RTX 2080 Ti, because this game has so much clutter, you are in a competetive disadvantage if you play it on High settings.
You should use your camera to record it from another computer so you can get more accurate readings on the fps if you're screen recording it on the same computer just a suggestion. Good video tho!
Good video man but being an owner of the 2080ti and a 144hz monitor, I can tell you with confidence that its plenty, if not overkill for 144fps @ 1080p. Even at 1440p ultra settings, most games will achieve 144fps
kudos for 0.1% low; EDIT: thank you for raising awarness about the issue. Maybe you can make comparison between 143 avg fps and 143 locked fps without drops with perfect-line graph. You may discover this is yet another level of fluent. Another would be putting locked 120fps through samsung tv configured for dejudder and blurr reduction, ex q8fn from 2018. There are worlds above the one you talk about. I wish you luck on your journey.
Mehhhh idk man. You obviously have a lot more experience than I, but I’m running an i5/9400f 1650 super and I have a great experience at 144 hz in apex. So good that I’m confident the 2060 is going to significantly stabilize it.
Do graphic cards help the frame rates? Because i am thinking of making a Gaming PC but I’m not an expert on PCs or laptops so i really don’t know if a graphic card is gonna boost frame rates in softwares like SFM
Tbh boys with a Ruben 5 36 or a 7 37, I’d say that if you’re willing to go half medium half high on games like MW you’ll clear the 120-144 FPS no problem like Fr mate
If you are trying to get 144fps like most e sport players want they don’t use max settings ultra nor epic. They want it to be reliable that’s why they play high settings 1080p. Even though they have dual 2080 tis they don’t play on 4k. They still play 1080p. I’ve seen some pros evens play 900p to get the most reliable FPS without overheating GPU or cpu.
Hey , I have a ryzen 5 2600 with my rtx only to see that I get around 40-50% GPU usage while CPU is at 100% does that mean I’m losing FPS because my cpu is weak compared to my GPU ? What cpu should I get to have maximum FPS with my rtx 2060
Hi sir. I have ryzen 5 3600, msi b450 tomahawk max, msi rtx 2060 ventus xs oc. I like to play aaa games at ultra maximum settings. I am torn between 2 monitors i like. The aoc 24g2 24" 144hz ips and asus tuf vg249q1r 24" 165 hz ips. Which of the two is better for ultra maximum settings on aaa games.
I've got a laptop with RTX 2060 and i7 9750H... I'm cosidering between a 4k 60hz (to game in 1080 but have better res and display quality for working) or 1080p 144hz display... Really hard to decide :(
You could go 1440 27 inches. You get decent image quality, not so hard performance hit and for games that fail at that res, you could still play at 1080 without scaling and would be like playing in 25 inches 1080 screen. I think you even get better pixel size this way but im not 100% of this and im too lazy to look for it.
Testing starts at 3:18
You’re a hero
Terry Hesticles We don’t wear capes anymore, too much attention.
When I read this comment I was on 3:10 XD
my god bless you
:)
next up, is the 2080 ti enough for 240p?
Not it struggles on 144p. Source: I have one
@@user-ul5gi9yw9t I think you meant to say 144p .999996 FPS
2000 fps
Guys it was a joke
@@alexkritsimallis9079 lmao we know i think, idk abut the other guys but yh
Keep in mind that this is on ultra settings when they aren’t what most people play on. Most play on medium setting or some are low and some are ultra for the best edge. This will give many many more fps so with the rtx 2060 this will be absolutely fine for 144hz gaming.
2:33 best part of the whole video ! lovely cat
She’s so adorable 🥺🥺🥺
No one plays maxed settings for high frame rate gaming only max VD and textures that’s about it
You play fortnite right?
@@andreasbustan6695 He's not wrong
@@0maybae frfr, playing ultra just makes shit stutter
@@0maybae oh well
True. If I'm online in even a semi-competitive game I want frames and the game usually looks good enough. For singleplayer games I'd crank up the settings while getting less frames and be ok with it.
Glad the reviews are positive. I plan on getting this gpu for my first build
2:36 she tried stealing your cpu !
your editing skills are beyond what a small youtuber can do. i thought u had 1 million subs
That's such a nice thing of you to say. Thank you. :D
great video, can't wait for your channel to grow!
Thank you very much! :D
It grew loo
And there is me, rocking rx580 on 1080 144hz...
Rokas B haha same, but tbh i play games like fortnite, csgo, lol, r6 in low settings + streched and i got +150 200 fps running with a 2600X 16gb ram 2933 (sry for my bad English :$)
Yeah same, low settings and stretched really helps to get 144fps, but sadly i only have a 60hz 5ms monitor
@Wojciech Szeler you got a spare monitor m8?
@Wojciech Szeler i got 2 24" 60hz ones, maybe i could go to the local pc shop and trade them in for a 144hz and maybe i add like 50 bucks
@Wojciech Szeler im mainly interested in fortnite and racing games, in fortnite i almost qualified for winter royale and other competitive events on 60hz, 144hz will really help me improve
Your cat is too funny he wants to build a gaming pc 😂😍
when thinking of 144hz gaming i think of doom, csgo and generally competitive games. (Br excluded since games with that much RNG just cant be competitive. its all about who gets the best stuff in the first few minutes) So the 2060 would be perfect for that and stable 60fps would be possible with everything else it seems. Still the price, like you mentioned, is too high. + i only recently got myself a 1060 6gb and im very happy with it. 1080p 60fps is very achievable on that puppy so yeah. will be a long time till i upgrade my gpu again.
great video as always^^
The GTX 1060 6Gb is one of the all time great GPUs in my opinion. I'm sure it will serve you well. :D
The RTX 2060 also would have been amazing at a lower price.
Thanks for the comment.
Sorry but 60fps is old gen, you have to lower the settings to get 144hz
@@Solid_Snake99 Wait a second. How do you compare "old gen" to "new gen"? Are you taking consoles as a standard or PC Hardware? If so 144hz would've been the standard back in 2013 when my friend got his first 144hz panel.
Lowkas No 144hz is the standard since 2015 when gtx1000 series came out, i’m ofcourse talking about pc, console is just utterly bad. We are already switching to 240hz standard btw it just costs too much
@@Solid_Snake99 i know about 240hz but how come 144 is just "standard" since 2015 when the panels were avaiable for a decent price for much longer? And 240hz panels have been available a very long time too. well. either way. I can get my 240fps in Need for Speed Underground 1. And since most modern games dont catch my interest I'm all good. (For now. Who knows how long that'll last)
After about 2 years, and all the optimizations I’ve done myself and that my card has gotten, 2060 can be a multi hundred FPS card at max settings.
Thats great!
do you have some sort of vid or web link in which you discuss the optimization, just bought new pre build pc with a 10th gen i5 and the rtx 2060 since currently building your own pc is a pain and probably more expensive, anyhow so far pc runs smooth as hell but since most demanding game I have tried is street fighter V that's no real benchmark ahhaha I plan on buying some new title like cyberpunk and I am quite sure my pc will start struggling if I don't do some optimization, would be great to have some insight from someone that already done the leg work since last time I tried to thinker and optimize my gaming laptop took me ages to find the sweet spot to be able to play games and not burn my cpu.
@@morid0 Man, this guy just has a wild imagination. There is simply no way to "optimize" a graphic card unless it is at driver level.. In his imagination he has made his super computer much faster.. the reality is that he just updated his drivers and maybe ran some crappy "optimization" program that will delete your caches and not much more...Unless he is struggling with the CPU, there is no real optimization you can do. The 2060 wont make any modern cpu to struggle to give full FPS.. so... Yeah, he has updated his drivers, the rest is his very own fantasy...Yeah, you can disable half your services in windows, but as as long your GPU isnt bottlenecked already, you wont gain a single fps from this....
The video quality is so good, I thought you would have like a million subscribers before I saw that you actually "only" have a bit more than 3000
For the best explanations on subjects like frame times or frame pacing Battle (non)sense is the go to channel. That guy is the best when it comes to frame rate testing and input lag.
That is very true, his videos are very informative. He really knows his stuff.
I have a 2060; If you don’t use all ultra settings, you can get a consistent 240fps easily. If i uncap my FPS, i get an average of around 400fps on fortnite.
atleast a few years, just dont play high settings if you want best fps
Really enjoy your style of presenting this info, keep 'Dawiding' it -- for sure!
That said... if you're talking about 144 hz monitors and by extension 144 fps gaming, you're almost invariably talking about e-sports titles; in which it is GOSPEL to run the game at mid to lower-tier settings for anyone taking the game 'seriously'. Infact, 'all low' is the consummate standard, as I'm sure you must know! Players who care about this sort of thing are also the types of players willing to do anything to hit well over 144 fps -- for instance, a CSGO player wants around 300 fps ideally and just wants a graphics card that clears well over the 144 fps minimum -- at LOW settings. :)
So, I'm sure testing at Ultra (come on -- as Tech Deals says 'ultra is for screen shots only'!) creates nice tidy, demarcated benchmarks, but it's far from a real-world scenario. I think it would be more realistic and therefore useful to make this explicitly clear in the video. Sorry if you did and I missed that, but I feel as an esports player myself, this is something that gets swept aside in favour of the
'let's see what graphics this baby can do!' mentality that is mostly contained within the 60 fps/hz single-player market. I'd love to see frame-rates at settings 80% of the community will be playing on!
Enjoyed the video, though!
Thank you, I really appreciate the useful information in your comment.
I should have more explicitly stated that the settings are unrealistic for the that type of gaming. One of the reasons that I didnt include tests with lower settings was because of the CPU bottleneck. Like I showed in the video, when running the games at ultra settings the CPU was sitting at just under 100% utilisation. When I did the tests at low settings the FPS didn't change much (which I should have mentioned in the video). Considering that I don't have access to a better gaming CPU I though I would just mention the CPU bottleneck and that you could get better results with a better CPU.
I really should have spoken about the low settings use case more in the video though. As you very correctly quoted Tech Deals ultra is just for screen shots and you shouldn't be gaming there.
My conclusion was made taking that consideration into account however and that is why I still recommended the GPU for 144Hz gaming even if my testing didn't show the best results.
Thank you again for this great comment. I am still learning how to make the best videos possible so I really appreciate this kind of feedback.
@@DawidDoesTechStuff Ah youtube just ate my reply, curses!
I appreciate the bottleneck constraints, but I'd certainly love to see an aside along the lines of ''And for the competitive gamers, you can expect to achieve within the region of 'x' fps with 'comp' settings, which compares to the market leader achieving around 'y''', something like that, which hopefully doesn't take up too much diagnostic time or siderail the video.
Also, love the choice of music. Accent is killer. Please never succumb to the allure of over-swanking (that sounds great eh) the production values to the extent that it becomes pandering to populism. Whatever makes you original will make you interesting. Just my salty grain for you there! :)
@@hoodwinky1 I will definitely keep that in mind, it is important to provide information for as many use cases as possible.
Thanks for the great feedback on the video quality, I get what your saying about over-swanking. The thing is, I really enjoy the "film making" (and I know that's a ridiculous term to use in this context but I can't think of another one) aspect of making these videos.
So I try to make the videos as beautiful as possible more for my own sake than anything. However I will keep that in mind.
@@DawidDoesTechStuff 'Tis always a trade-off between appeasing people and time management. Whatever makes sense for your vision, in the end!
I think you're hitting a pretty good balance so far, with the occasional fast-edit sequence ;). Nah, I don't think that's ridiculous: you obviously put care into the video and it shows in the quality. Doing it for yourself or for 'it's' sake is the best reason I'd say; a beautiful thing. Looking forward to your new stuff!
lets see if ryzen 3000 will be a good cpu for high refresh....
My i5 4670k gets pretty close even at stock, so I can't imagine what Ryzen 3000 feels like!
@@stalecoffee6454 ryzen isnt that great for gaming actually, but still pretty close to intel.
@@hwstar9416 It's all relative :D
It’s only less 5fps. But you get more performance using multiple apps opened and streaming works lol
@@Solid_Snake99 Yeah my i5 experiences death when more than 0 tabs are open while I play Forza lol. I still get around 80-110 fps avg. tho but with a lot of stuttering, probably 8GB isn't enough.
why this guy have only 26k subs? I tought he has a 1mil+
Yes Me Too.
I 'tought" he doesn't
Quality of videos doesn't directly correlate with sub count. There are a lot of good tubers with low subs and too much bs tubers with a load of subs.
Great video Dawid, very useful information! Keep it up ;D
Oh sorry for the late reply. Thanks man. :D
This some high quality production here, audio was good, transitions was good and it got straight to the point with some jokes. +1
this card for 700 euros now. is it worth it that much?
Yeah i had Zotac AMP version 2060, a very good card.
There aren't many reviews on it. Did you run into any problems and how was its performance?
your content as a tech youtuber u deserve over 500k subs ur underrated
Thank you very much. :D
Ohh
I know you didnt just say PUBG is a fast paced game 🤔 btw i'm a new follower to your channel. You remind me a lot of techteamGB. Great videos all around! Hope your channels blows up soon in terms of subscribers 👍🏻
Haha!! Well I meant like a shooter which benefits from faster reactions and frame rates. :)
Thanks for the nice comment.
The best adviuce I could ever give someone is to wait. Keep checking prices and usually assume that prices will be %10-20 cheaper during black friday/cyber monday. Barring any DDR4 price gouges. Everything but GPU's seem to be getting cheaper and if your only looking to do 60fps 1080p gaming a rx 570 or similar will be good for you. Just remmeber to get 16gb of ram and a ryzen six core! Lots of games are utilizing more than 4 cores and will bottleneck your cpu resulting in lots of frames lost. If you like me and you watch youtube or movies while gaming or would like to stream/record your gameplay your gonna need at least a six core. Fortunately they are very affordable! Thanks AMD. Now only if they would bring a 1440p 144hz gpu to market for around $400!
EVGA decided to use a couple nubs for my 2060's heatpipes... I want to add more. This card does 1080p 75fps great btw.
Cat: You should use AMD instead, let me help you to take it out.
Lmao yeah I mean the cat is speaking fax
@Lucas Awad ruclips.net/video/02vDkMEdIkY/видео.html
@Lucas Awad skip to 1 minute
@Lucas Awad this man is speaking FÆCTS
my gtx1060 on 144hz laptop full settings runs in 107 fps avg in apex ...
Dang my 1060 laptop only gets 80fps on average. Maybe your processor is better?
In metro exodus 56 avg is to low, I have the 1060 6G with a fx 8320e and a can reach 50 on ultra 1080, of course, with a lot of stuttering
asus gm505 tuf ... good gaming laptop
@@MoistPancakes i7 8750h something like that
Yeah my rx580 is around that too, but lower fps because of i5 3rd Gen and ddr3 8gb ram
For everyone wondering, no it’s not enough, get a rx 5700xt atleast
Or... or... you re-evaluate if you can actually see the difference between high and ultra in the games you play, probably realize you can't and then just go ahead anyway since it'll increase your framerate by an average of 20-30 in plenty of games. Not saying I would, but it's definitely something people should consider. There's quite some titles where the difference is purely in being able to say ''I run the game at ultra!''.
If 90fps isn't enough you can drop a few settings and get maybe 20-40 more.
I personally stop seeing a difference after about 80-90.
The 2060 is probably minimum you need these days but it's good enough.
@@letni9506 it's more expensive than the rx 5700, at least in my country
dude the 1660 super get 140+ fps in low settings .. who the fuck plays in ultra .. everyone plays medium and low
Trixi Nour lol pathetic, a new card should play high at maximum fps
This was a really helpfull video, Thank you
Lol love the cat fixing the seating of the cpu. Take notes dude. Them cat eyes are sharp!
2060 Super at $400 is now worth getting.
It's basically a renamed 2070.
Yeah, I didn't take Super into account here. I think you have a good point. If you forget about the naming scheme and concentrate on the performance for the dollar, the new super cards are definitely a step in the right direction.
@@DawidDoesTechStuff
Mhmm. People are too fixated of 'but muh mid range card' that they fail to see how impressive the cards are.
The leap is greater this generation than it was for Pascal... Although that comes with a bit higher price tag.
Dude no plays 144hz on ultra settings, most people play on competitive or medium settings and cap the framerate at 144
Nadav ALON why the hell would cap it at 144? A lot of people play single players, btw
Jinkies m8 what does that even mean??? You cap it at 144fps so that you can reach that on competitive settings also for single players whatever that means. Basically ppl who play at 144hz dont play on high or ultra settings
@@nadow1899 can confirm. I care about fps more than looks. Then again 1440p is a huge upgrade over 1080p anyways but still.
Why didn't you also test it with a few lower setting instead of ultra in the graphics section?
Thanks for the frame rate review on all the games Like R6 and GTA, I play those games alot and used to play with average 80 frames. Im planning to get a GPU and a CPU so thanks.
I got my rtx 2060 for 850 bucks. And you saying it's 350???
Damn just low some of that ultra settings and it will be 144 fps easly in shooters.
My g4560 pentium and gtx 1050 can get 165fps in fortnite. Settings are View distance epic, shadows off, aa medium, textures medium, effects low, post processing, off
On 720p
Nope I’m on 1080p
I’m not joking
Try it
@@milkstorm4818 sure
u gone from 2k to 200k subs in like an year ?!
Lekker Channel broertjie.
Doen asseblief 'n comparison tussen die RX5700 XT vs RTX 2070 SUPER as jy hulle in die hande kan kry. Sal interessant wees! Thanks!
RTX2060 in the new F1 from Code-masters does over 100fps in 1080p highest settings with old drivers. Does over 60 all the way in 1440p highest settings with Vsync
Even though RTX cards is insanely expensive I think this will be the trend for pricing in the future because manufacturing and design are getting harder to do when going to a smaller Manufacturing process i.e 14nm-12 nm -7nm ect even though the are saving money on the silicon wavers at smaller processes the difficulty drives up costs although Nvidias profit margin is greater because amd is currently not able to compete because of the approach they are taking they are a year behind nvidia on performance hopefully future iterations of navi would come to market quicker ...... You sound South African ??
man’s predicted the future
Bro you are so cool why do you have 80k subs u deserve more than that man
It all depends on the games you play and settings you choose
7600K is the best CPU I have available...
*1 Year Later*
Using the i9 10850K
dude! so glad i found your channel.
Do you even 144fps bro?
Me: Ummm not I don't even 40fps bro.....
Are you from South Africa
Now it is the most expensive one 😂
Just Purchased a Msi Optix 27” 1080p @ 144hz & paired it with my Ryzen 7 3700x Plus Msi Mpg x570 + Xpg 32gb 3000 Ram + Xpg Sx8100 Mvne & Rtx 2060 8gb Super Gpu 🖥 i prefer Quality over performance ( if i have to Choose ) playing Most games at high vs ultra usually doesn’t have a noticeable image difference unless you’re really looking and you’d be Surprised how easy 144 frames can be achieved with high Compared to ultra with Very minor Visual quality 🍷 either way hopefully this helps Someone who doesn’t like Spending money on graphic cards that costs the price of the rest of their Computer Components “ like me “ 🇵🇹☠️🤬🇵🇹
6:20 October 2020 still 2060 cost = $314
Next time go all low for the most FPS, maybe leave textures on med/high with some AA...
A variation of mid-high and some settings low/turned off would be more realistic
I recently purchased a 144hz monitor, and play Fortnite from 130fps-240 (Capped ) my build is : i5-8400 + GTX 1060 6GB :)
Zealous Pumpkin not max settings buddy
Solid_Snake who uses max settings not even ninja who owns one of the best PCs
Solid_Snake I hate playing max settings, not cuz of the fps. , I can still hit 60-100 on all maxed, but shadows hinder the fights, textures literally do not make any difference and anti aliasing from high to epic does nothing, I put aliasing on medium, viewing distance epic and everything low, and the game looks great. Any decent/good player at fortnite never plays in max / high settings.
Solid_Snake ninja plays everything low and viewing distance Epic.
@@ZealousPumpkinTV when new games come out you get less fps
I used to have one of these cards and it served me pretty well
Tried all RTX's and 2060 does 60fps+ 1080p in all games i tried including battlefield 5 highest settings with raytracing.
Is that not good enough? Mine is a ASUS STRIX only get up 60 degrees celsius and are really quit. Also overclocks to
over 2100mhz and is still really quit. Almost does as good as GTX1080 just not in 4k because of the 6Gb ram. But the
new SUPER's should be faster than GTX1080 according to my calculations. That is pretty good i think. And ALSO does
raytracing. Because without they are still the fastest graphic card's. A 2060 almost beating an 1080 when did that happen
last?
The GTX1060 could not beat the 980 anyways. And still people pay much more for the old series?
i cant believe that you have only 8,7 subs (you are so cool)
Did you try testing the card with no intake fans, to try and make use of the H500 negative pressure benefits?
Also I'm quite surprised how cool the Zotac card is O_O There are actually rumors around here abt how hot Zotac cards are. Thanks for the vid Dawid!
i am super late to this vid but if you don't care about the quality of the picture, paring an i7 with the 2060 and putting the settings to low is a good way to go.
2:32
Best part of the video!
5:02 and honesnly XD
I'm surprised you're not at 10k man.
You've got alot going for you, I hope you get some money and review Ryzen 3000 CPU as that will almost certainly give you good traffic.
Keep it up tho!
Thank you very much. I will definitely be ding some Ryzen reviews. :D
I have a 1660Ti and I play Overwatch on 144hz without any problems whatsoever. Capped frames at 144 and it stays that way. Of course, it sometimes drops to 139 when there is too much shit going on but it isn't noticable.
Edit: Settings to low of course, but I'd do that even if I had an RTX 2080 Ti, because this game has so much clutter, you are in a competetive disadvantage if you play it on High settings.
i got a 1080ti, 144fps is not doable in most games, but then most games are shit so in good games that i play i get 144fps 99% of the time.
I play at 240 fps with this, 144 is a cake walk. Just optimize NVidia and windows settings and stop being a bot
How if I can ask?
Dude your accent sounds familiar :)
Suthhhh efricennn
I habe a amd ryzen 2 2200g how can i still have 144fps pls let me now
You should use your camera to record it from another computer so you can get more accurate readings on the fps if you're screen recording it on the same computer just a suggestion. Good video tho!
I saw a 2070 for under 400 the other day on newegg, is rather go for that then a 340 dollar 2060
what song was that during the montage of average fps?
Good video man but being an owner of the 2080ti and a 144hz monitor, I can tell you with confidence that its plenty, if not overkill for 144fps @ 1080p. Even at 1440p ultra settings, most games will achieve 144fps
I can tell you from an owner of the super powerful 750 ti I have is that 720p is the answer 😂😂😂😂😂
kudos for 0.1% low; EDIT: thank you for raising awarness about the issue. Maybe you can make comparison between 143 avg fps and 143 locked fps without drops with perfect-line graph. You may discover this is yet another level of fluent. Another would be putting locked 120fps through samsung tv configured for dejudder and blurr reduction, ex q8fn from 2018. There are worlds above the one you talk about. I wish you luck on your journey.
Michał Hojwa GN raises plenty of awareness on % lows. Also, gaming at 144HZ locked at 143 FPS? I’m lost. And blur reduction on? Why even bother haha
Mehhhh idk man. You obviously have a lot more experience than I, but I’m running an i5/9400f 1650 super and I have a great experience at 144 hz in apex. So good that I’m confident the 2060 is going to significantly stabilize it.
he played Metro Exodus with raytracing on.. yep so... even there a rtx 2080 ti wont do 144fps. right. yep. but if you turn it off! :O
If you turn it off its an ez 40-50 fps gain
@@yuhyuh5674 yes!
why tf were you using that meme of a heatsink ? 😂
Why would even pair a 2060 with a 144hz monitor in the first place? Ide aim for 120hz
found you from a VidlQ comment thing perfect content.
Thought I'd share my input here having a 2080. It won't. Unless you plan on turning off most settings, 2080 already has issues holding 144.
I think the 2060 can definitely handle 144 fps in competitive games as long as you have a good cpu
Do graphic cards help the frame rates? Because i am thinking of making a Gaming PC but I’m not an expert on PCs or laptops so i really don’t know if a graphic card is gonna boost frame rates in softwares like SFM
They are basically essential for a playable frame rate
Tbh boys with a Ruben 5 36 or a 7 37, I’d say that if you’re willing to go half medium half high on games like MW you’ll clear the 120-144 FPS no problem like Fr mate
1:14 nah bro shroud just 5'3 feet tall
If you are trying to get 144fps like most e sport players want they don’t use max settings ultra nor epic. They want it to be reliable that’s why they play high settings 1080p. Even though they have dual 2080 tis they don’t play on 4k. They still play 1080p. I’ve seen some pros evens play 900p to get the most reliable FPS without overheating GPU or cpu.
My son has a 144hz monitor and i7 8700k cpu this sounds like a perfect upgrade from his 1060 what u think?
Lol time flies
Now u cant get A 2nd hand Rtx 2060 even at 400$
Goddamn this is what I was looking for
Hey ,
I have a ryzen 5 2600 with my rtx only to see that I get around 40-50% GPU usage while CPU is at 100% does that mean I’m losing FPS because my cpu is weak compared to my GPU ? What cpu should I get to have maximum FPS with my rtx 2060
Abroad in Japan Vibe in benchmark test hehe
U have a ASUS rtx 2060 and I get 350fps idk how
Will it be a waste if I get a 75hz monitor?
Yes
What was the song in the background between 3:18 and 4:52?
Hi sir. I have ryzen 5 3600, msi b450 tomahawk max, msi rtx 2060 ventus xs oc. I like to play aaa games at ultra maximum settings. I am torn between 2 monitors i like. The aoc 24g2 24" 144hz ips and asus tuf vg249q1r 24" 165 hz ips. Which of the two is better for ultra maximum settings on aaa games.
This card versus asus strix 1070ti? Which is better u think?
Super happy I got this for just $50 above MSRP
How?
I've got a laptop with RTX 2060 and i7 9750H... I'm cosidering between a 4k 60hz (to game in 1080 but have better res and display quality for working) or 1080p 144hz display... Really hard to decide :(
You could go 1440 27 inches. You get decent image quality, not so hard performance hit and for games that fail at that res, you could still play at 1080 without scaling and would be like playing in 25 inches 1080 screen. I think you even get better pixel size this way but im not 100% of this and im too lazy to look for it.
You almost have to mention that most people who want to hit 144hz dont play on Ultra/Highest, So that does help them hit the mark.
I do
Hey, what is that cpu cooler???? I have never seen.
you can just turn your res or settings down, as long as your is good enough
i have a rx 5700 and ryzen 5 2600. Will that be enough for 1080p 144fps or even 1440p?
Is this the normal one or the super cause I got the super and I’m just wondering
Only reason I have a 144Hz monitor is because I don't like Vsync, but I also don't like screen tearing.
adaptive sync is the way