The 10 Advanced Weapons of USA that Will Enter Service
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 май 2024
- The 10 Advanced Weapons of USA that Will Enter Service
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
0:00 Introduction
0:56 AGM-88 HIGH-SPEED ANTI-RADIATION MISSILE
1:37 STRIKE TOMAHAWK
2:26 THE F-15EX EAGLE II
3:46 CVN-79)
6:16 THE F-16 FIGHTIN
8:12 THE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE (PRSM)
10:17 THE ACV RECOVERY VARIANT (ACV-R) 
Наука
Seems like this video thinks we're in the early 2000s.
Why? None of these weapons existed in the early 2000s.
Why is that?
@@Jermo7899 The video says things like it is a expected to be in service in 2011
Right, old stuff. Americans got stuck in 20century. Aircraft carries - a huge target for hypersonic missiles which Russia and China have been operating for a few years already. What Americans have to protect those brand new ships? Upgraded tomahawks? In any conflict with Russia or China these carriers are just a floating mass grave
I was thinking the same
That's what makes U.S. weapons implementing latest tech and AI superior in my opinion
Most of these "futuristic weapons" have already launched and are already being used while others have been canceled or postponed indefinitely 🙄
This F-15 is a missile truck. The F-35 and NGAD fighter, with drones, will allow the F-15 to launch missiles from very far away, and they'll guide the missiles in with precision
Still a top dog fighter as well, even without stealth.
one of those missles is the agm158 with 1,000mile range
You don't mention the one thing that separates u.s. weapons from most others .that the quality control of the hardware is amazing . Americans don't just make things but they them things well and consistently makes them to a standard .that's what makes u.s. weapons superior in my opinion
I take it the Carrier JFK is still not (as 2023), part of the USN, although started in 2011, commissioned in 2013 and launched in 2019, it still is not 100% finished. No mention of when it is due to enter service. - is it also to have Drone capability....? very useful and less expensive too.
The M88 Hercules must be 60 years old. It just tows vehicles and it is crewed by mechanics
Am I the only one that thinks the AGM 158 should be named the JISSM instead
And I thought calling the F-15EX the "F-1 SEXy" was bad.
JISSM is certainly no worse than calling the 52's "BUFF", hehe.
Different kind of Shock and Awe if we start dropping 1,000 pound JISSM on China’s military.
There are a few issue I have. The AIM-260 has a passive radar mode. It would have been nice if they had been able to just use this instead of the HARM. Reducing munitions saves a lot of money and storage and the AIM-260 is powerful. The John F. Kennedy as far as I know still lacks the upgraded deck surface to be able to handle the hotter F-35 engines. The 3rd carrier is supposed to have this fixed and possibly have an upgraded radar suit. It might also have a 300kw Helios laser defense system on it too. The other two will need to be refitted after the 3rd one comes out. The F-16 is just not needed. The F-35 is basically the same cost and fits the same roles... and the F-35 is better in most ways. The PrSM also can be used in the HIMMARS M142. The range is impressive at possibly as far as 1000km. The export version will likely be limited to 499km do to certain treaties. The PrSM uses the same 500 pound warhead and while the pod system for the HIMMARS only fits 1 ATACMS, they can fit 2 PrSM. The PrSM will likely be faster than the Mach 3 the ATACMS goes. The M88 is nothing special... nice but not groundbreaking. Same with the ACR. I want to see the anti ship version of the AGM158D.
Are you sure there will be a 1000 km version of prsm??
New F-16 model really is an export market aircraft for markets where it's not competing with 5th gen, due to sketchy security of the purchasing nation (Taiwan for example). It's fine for that. But I agree the USAF shouldn't touch it. 4th-gen 'dogfighters' are about as useful as A-10's (ie: not at all on the modern battlefield).
Presumably, the HARM would be cheaper than using an AIM-260... but whether it's cheaper enough to warrant the extra logistics/cost or more munition types, I dunno. Good point.
I didn't know the PrSM could fit two in a HIMMARS pod. Does that mean the MLRS can fit 4?
300 kw lasers are very nearly "ready to go". Should be very easy to retrofit quickly, just plug & play. Useless in the rain, limited range across surface to low level targets, but very useful otherwise.
@@RobertLutece909 Ah... I guess it was the blast shields and electronics. I was trying to remember back 3-4 years ago. I remember they had to upgrade the Wasp structural support in certain areas for the F-35, but it might have been the America class that needed the deck surface upgraded.
Yes the HARM missile has a 150 pound high explosive warhead fragmentation and the AIM-260 has only a 50 pound high explosive fragmentation warhead, but the AIM-120 is much faster at Mach 5 compared to Mach 1.8 and has double the range (200km vs 100km). The US had been testing AIM-120 to be able to fire at ground targets. The AIM-260 is supposed to have a passive and active radar and IR so likely it would just be software upgrades at that point to be able to do a similar mission. It just give an F-35 more options. If it is carrying 2 AIM-260 and 2 Mark 84 JDAM and detects a radar it can not avoid it could hit the radar. The HARM is too large to replace the AIM-260 and would have to fit where the Mk 84 goes. They can also double up the AIM-260 on external pilons, but not the HARM. And with the ability to lock with passive, active, and IR, the AIM-260 is more likely to hit a target and be able to hunt for a wider range of targets.
I can understand maybe from a training and logistic purpose, but the F-16 is still $26K per hour and the F-35 is $42. That is not a huge increase in operating costs considering the advancements the F-35 brings to the board compared to the F-16. Maybe as an upgrade to existing F-16 if might be worth it, but F-35 is just so much more capable and to go into a dangerous area a pair of F-35 would likely be able to complete missions that might take 6 F-16 and some targets would just be too dangerous for the F-16. But realistically with a new engine and most of the electronics being upgraded there is likely a lot less parts shared between the variants for maintenance purposes.
Just comparing the two. The F-35 is faster with similar payloads, has a MUCH longer range (double without drop tanks... which the F-35 is getting too), the same ceiling, fast cruising speed of Mach 1.2 compared to the F-16 Mach 0.75, can carry about 1,000 pounds more payload (using external hardpoints). If using external hardpoints has more hardpoints...
They are even looking to add mounds internally to be able to carry 2 say AIM-120/260 in place of the single 2000 pound JDAM. This would give it a "Beast Mode" of 2 AIM-9x and 16 AIM-120/260. The F-16 can only fit 13, but typically 2 on the fuselage are sensor pods and if it carries drop tanks do to is much shorter combat range, it would usually only be able to carry 6. In air to ground "Beast Mode" the4 F-35 carries 2 AIM-9x, 2 AIM-120/260 and again with drop tanks the F-16 would only carry 2 AIM-9, 2 AIM-120, and 2 2000 pound JDAM.
Then there is the 360 degree IR for far better situational awareness as well as the stealth capabilities. The F-16 does carry about 3x as much ammo for its 20mm gun, but the F-35 also has a 25mm gun.
@@RobertLutece909 Yes but while it is a 60% increase the capabilities of the F-35 means it can fly missions the F-16 can not and when flying the missions the F-16 would normally handle they could likely send half as many aircraft. With the purchase prices being similar and the cost per hour being only 60% more I would think the F-16 is pretty obsolete.
The only time I could see the F-16 block 70 being worth it is if you already have an F-16 block 20 or newer as you can upgrade them to the block 70 and this would save you money. Likely the US arms deals prevent them from selling the older F-16 too.
@@furiouswolf2566 with Russia fully pulling out of that treaty (they werent following it before) the US is no longer bound by that treaty either
0:42 The "AARRRGH!"- 'em -er? Lolol...
Goes well with the WHACK-'em and ATTACK-'em missiles 😂
Did he just say the first upgraded F-16 is to be delivered to the Chinese Air Force?
LMAO
YES, TAIWAN - REPUBLICAN CORRECT
Taiwan. Not the Peoples Republic.
Wait....... whats the date ? Did I just fall through a crack in time to the past ?
The F16-V Delivered to the Republic of China in 2017..WTF!!
so terrible, our politicians are the most crooked and stupid and oldest in the world
Does everybody agree that the acronym ATACMS is the best ever!
My favorite acronym is D's
Yes! It's what a 10 year old boy would name such a weapon.
Indeed I'm now twenty years younger 😂
It's like I'm going back to my youngest days
I'm glad to see the military is working hard to keep the fall safe, but we're not safe but.
My reaction to the title of this video is 😂😅😂
The background music is a bit too loud and distracting. If you lower it in the future, I think it would be better. TKS. 👌
The jassm has not only been in use for a while, but has a new deployment system, rapid dragon
Anything called Rapid Dragon HAS to be good.
If you made something, that wasn't great, and had the audacity to name it rapid dragon, you would be guilty of a crime against God...
@@phineascampbell3103 the c17 can unload 32 such missles within a few minutes
Boys, the future ain't what it used to be 😮😂🎉
what they would establish with that huge Propellers ?
The fact that old planes are being upgraded is imazing
But apparently it's "shameful" when other countries do that
I love to read all these "Expert thoughts on military hardware" when they ran the other way when they were asked to actually fight someone, and not on a computer game... veteran of US Army in the vietnam era....
US latest and top of the World Baby
FYI:
Republic of China = TAIWAN
And still haven't done anything 😂
JFK commissions in 2013?? 🤔
so many things wrong in this video I dont even know where to start !!!
price is so high for ALL of these vehicles and weapons that.... in a hot war.... how much of these can be lost?
This is an old video.Kennedy is a Nimitz class or was in the 1990's.These tilt rotor aircraft are a help to our enemies.They kill more Marines than terrorists do.
Is the new F-15 a brand new plane or are the old ones upgradeable?
It's old..and upgradable .
Built brand new.
Sooo is the VTOL in the thumbnail going to fire it’s hellfire missiles through its own prop?
Maybe it goes to hover mode.
US navy needs to EXPAND 😮 we need 100 ships fast
Have a friend who is working on the new viper. He said the test pilots are amazed how much better it is than the f16 o.g
@6:43 By saying Republic of China do you mean Taiwan. Because it's really Taiwan and not main land China.
I was confused by that too
It should be Taiwan Air Force
Taiwan is part of China 🤫
it is taiwan.. its official name is republic of china while communist china goes by the name of the people's republic of china, PROC..
The Republic of China is the proper name. Taiwan is the name of the island they live on.
CORRECTION: Boeing builds the F-15 EX, not McDonnell-Douglas.
I'm curious why the Air Force has no issue with refitting the F-15 while constantly trying to get rid of A-10's. I think the role the F-15EX could be filled easier than the role of the A-10. The Air Force's argument usually devolves to the "the A-10 is old" reasoning to justify getting rid of it. The F-15 was introduced 1 year before the Warthog.
It’s all about $. The F15 is sold to allies and there is still a market for a new modern version with our allies and in our own airforce, where as the A 10 isn’t available for our allies to buy meaning no market and no money to be made off upgrading it where as the F 15 F16 F18 F35 all pay for they own upgrades cause they are being bought by other countries.
@@CamD477 The F15EX is also to used as a bulk missile carrier that the F-35 can direct for the kills.
The primary argument I hear to get rid of the A10 is that is no longer survivable in a modern hostile environment. Modern Jets and Anti-Air systems can easily shoot it down. It can only be used in an environment where our other Fighters have spent a lot of time destroying all the enemy fighters and anti-air. So only when we have complete air superiority can the A10 be brought in.
With the advent of man-pads and other small mobile anti-air missiles/systems we can no longer guarantee their won't be something hiding their than will shoot down an A10. The F15/F16's have enough speed to potentially escape these missiles while F22/F35 can't be targeted (though sometimes they can be tracked...still can't get a targeting lock).
They say it's not survivable in highly contested airspace. Flys low and slow vulnerable to PANPADS. That's what the generals say.
STOP... that blasted background noise !!!!!
Dwelling on the defense of civilians advances the art of weaponry, because everything already works.
How about a high speed stealth troop carrier 😁
Ah, yes this will help the Joes in their fight against Cobraaaaaaaaaa
Our country will protect us.
I use to work on the AAVP7A1. I GUESS THE TIMES THEY ARE A CHANGING. IM OLD SCHOOL NOW LMFAO
YAT-YAS
8:44 USA withdrawal from the INF treaty just fyi.
What's with the strange mispronunciations?
"Marine corpse" was my favorite 😂
The f-15 us currently the most badass fighter in the world . With a record of 105 to 0 before the latest broke out. I've heard its now 110 to 0. And the F22 us supposed to be better. This will probably go over faster than we destroyed Saddam Hussein's air force. They've already proved they can sneak up right behind people that come up alongside of the other fighter and tell them
You should go home now.
6:39 он прекрасен, советы дрожат от страха😂
#5 крутая вещь, но я бы предпочел классическую вертолетную платформу
Me too what people don’t understand is what happens when one of the propellers for engines have a problem!
The Sikorsky raider X should have been the future! But in America, it’s not about dominance anymore. It’s more about how to provide levels of income for your bodies and those in your inner circle.
Oh, I like that this video said "Republic of China"!
Eagle's baby they were ahead of their time
I wonder if these weapons are for show or museum pieces or to win a war?
Missiles speed not mention.
Tilt rotor it's a flawed system. Prop wash going from free air to obstructed over wings. Tilt wing doesn't need Giant rotors to overcome this issue
We need battleships.
Worry about the weapons they do not tell you about.
Did I hear that right, we sold China the upgraded F16v? That can't be true. If it is, why?
News to me!
Taiwan you little fool
Taipei…not Beijing
Taiwan, my dude
it said republic of china which is taiwan's official name while mainland china's name is the people's republic of china..
Nothing for anti-drone warfare?
Indeed I'm now twenty years younger
The F15 EX is a bad ass Killer that when you see it’s already too late because it holds enough ordinance to wipe out a city or Enemy Air Craft Carrier, Destroyer, and all enemy aircraft, Tanks, Personnel Carriers & SAM Missile Launchers. Also a Bunker Destroyer.
The F15 EX is the most feared in Air to Air Dog Fights because of Hard Points to carry more air to Air missiles and two of the most powerful fighter engines made that give it more Power than any Rival to run them down or to leave them clueless .
My money will always be on the F15 ‘s they all should be feared.
F22 bro! ⚡️🇺🇸
Hell yeah....I mean, after stealthy F22, F35, LRASM missiles have taken out the anti-air defenses.
Why don't we tell our enemies everything...
1 trillion a year, expected more
❤USA #1 Always and Forever...
good video
6:42 First delivered to Chinese Airforce?
Where's the other two they are building Aircraft Carriers
I'm sorry but you say about weapons that WILL or ARE already in service ???
It's a mix. By example, CVN-79 won't be commissioned until 2025. And the title is ambiguous. These are "US weapons" but they're not all currently being purchased by the US.
Both
When they said China re: F-16, it’s similar in name but = Taiwan.
Why not put that money into NGAD Fighters program I mean I know why they are gun trucks for the Stealth Aircraft
IT WOULD BE MUCH BETTER VIDEO WITH OUT THE MUSIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This video is old because the F15 EX II is already out
06:43 Republic of China 🤣🤣
That is Taiwan's official name which is the Republic of China while the Mainland is Called the Peoples Republic of China.
@@charlesleonard7734 You would be Surprised HOW few People actually KNOW Taiwan is the REAL & legitimate Chinese Government that fled the Communist MAO & the CCP to Taiwan !!!
What? No hypersonic missiles?
Hello this is 2023 get your facts right
How effective are these weapons in slowing the invasion on our southern border ? ?
Our problem isn't technology. The Uniparty likes illegal aliens. One side likes cheap labor and the other side expects voters for life.
The F16V was NEVER delivered to the china AF
Did I hear the a I got say that the first one was delivered to the republic of china Come on now that can't be right
Did he just said that the USA deliverd the first F-16 V to the Republic of china??
I'am guessing he means Taiwan.. not China..😱🤔
Old story to earn clicks. Don’t bother.
your volume of your production is far too low. I am at max volume on headset and system, and you're still low
late upload maybe 😂😊
There are about 8 inaccuracies in this video. just to point out two, he said that the JFK rolled out I. 2013 and the. Said that the US sold F16s to China which is not true
Medium range treaty non applicable any longer, due to Russia
No Vipers went to Republic of China. It is Taiwan.
6:42 😅😅 did he just say that the first F16 V was delivered to republic of China Air Force in 2017 😅😅😅
yeah I stopped watching the video after that line. Makes you call into question the accuracy of the rest of the video. Strange. Sometimes I think these videos are AI created.
That's Taiwan
republic of china = taiwan
people's republic of china = communist china
Don't quit teaching I recommend she teach ballerina at a private religious based school! She will see the results will differ vastly
Did he say the F16 was delivered to china?
The republic of china is taiwan while the people's republic of china is mainland/communist china..
Go Bell!
This was a disaster sorry but who wrote the commentary?
Hey Guys! I just want to let you know that Jesus loves you so much, that He is coming soon, and that He will bring all those who truly trust Him to safety in heaven. He is our Lord and Savior. He cares for us and wants us all to be safe. Let us all get prepared before He comes.
Jesus loves us❤❤❤
So that's where my tax money went, instead of getting homeless veterans out of the streets and into homes. Nice nice
It’s a bummer that RUclips doesn’t show thumbs downvotes anymore.
You can see 👎 if you know what to down load also depending on browser .....Anyway This currently has 56 dislikes!!!
I imagine people are flipping out and no one knows. well I hope they at least target the really sick people and send that info to the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security. otherwise they are dropping the ball if something happens. lawsuit.
👎
57@@Im1CrazyCow
That y we r makeing now thing
Send to Ukraine durability test
He said f16 sold to the Republic of China ?
USA sold F16s to China in 2016????
Republic of China 😂😂😂 just say Taiwan!
Huh?
@@rogerwilco5918 Taiwan is the REAL & legitimate Chinese Government that fled the Communist MAO & the CCP to Taiwan .... It's World official Name is The Republic of China !!
that is taiwan's official name.. communist china's name is the people's republic of china..
To think! All this expence is future junk for some desert scrap yard?
Why are we giving money to Italy?
Send them to Ukraine for Free!! Ukraine important above all!!
300 kilometers not miles
Why would you sell this jet to China
.Or did you miss quote
?
fool
That is Taiwan. People's Republic of China is mainland China....or East Taiwan if you want. 😉
First unit went to China????
are they jam proof?
the US has some of the most advanced EW platforms kiddo