LAWYER: Congress FORCES Breath Tests for ALL Drivers?!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 май 2024
- Is Congress Taking Away Your Freedom with Mandatory Car Breath Tests? Find Out Now! #infrastructurebill #constitutionalrights #surveillance
Arrested in Texas? Get a Free Case Analysis: www.criminalattorneyfortworth...
Free Guides:
What to Do When You've Been Charged in Texas: www.criminalattorneyfortworth...
Ultimate Guide to DWI Defense in Texas: www.criminalattorneyfortworth...
What to Do When Charged with Domestic Violent Crime: www.criminalattorneyfortworth...
How to Beat a Drug Charge in Texas: www.criminalattorneyfortworth...
Car manufacturers are taking steps to comply with these provisions by working on implementing alcohol detection technology in their vehicles. Some car companies, such as Volvo and Ford, have already announced plans to include this technology in their cars by 2024. Other manufacturers are also exploring similar technologies or partnerships with companies that specialize in alcohol detection technology.
However, the implementation of such technology raises concerns about personal privacy and data protection. Drivers have a reasonable expectation of privacy inside their vehicles, and the collection of sensitive personal data, such as video footage and location data, requires proper consent and notification.
There will be some form of technology collecting data while a driver is in the car's interior. The interior of the car is considered a place with a reasonable expectation of privacy even under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. New York v. Class, 475 U.S. 106, 114-115 (1986).
The language of the RIDE Act bill states the following: To require the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, to prescribe a Federal motor vehicle safety standard for advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology, and for other purposes.
“For other purposes” is disturbing language because it attempts to provide a wide-net of oversight. In other words, anyone who drives a car would be under the surveillance technology of the bill. But the bill states the following: Technical capability.-Any advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology required for new passenger motor vehicles under subsection (a) that measures blood alcohol concentration shall use the adult legal limit for blood alcohol concentration of the jurisdiction in which the passenger motor vehicle is located.
Does that mean breathalyzers for every new car? facial scanning technology? Something else? Likely some combination of both.
Who has access to the data collected by this system provided for in this legislation? Will the police be given access to the data without a warrant? What about insurance companies, will they be granted access to the data in order to better understand what kind of driver is being insured, or worse, will they know with what frequency your driving habits “change” which could then be interpreted as impairment?
When it comes to “driving prevention,” are we looking at the vehicle being locked in Park while running? Or will it not run at all? Soon enough the United States federal government could force automakers to install kill switches authorities can access and use to shut down any newer vehicle.
The kill switch, which is referred to as a safety device, must “passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired.” What does that actually mean? It means government agencies will constantly be monitoring how you drive and measuring whether you are a threat to the public safety. But should you do something the system programming has deemed to recognize as driver impairment, your vehicle could find itself just shut off at a push of a button, which could be incredibly dangerous.
And returning back to legal interpretations, who defines and decides what the term "impaired driving" means? Currently it isn't defined by any legislation so does that leave that open regulators of the NHTSA or the DOT? Can you imagine the extent of algorithms written because you chose to pass someone or got to close to the line separating the lanes in a moment of brief distraction?
00:00 Congress Mandates Breath Tests for ALL Drivers?! Must-Watch!
01:18 2021 Infrastructure Investment Jobs Act
01:34 HR 3684
01:47 “Collect Data To Detect Impaired Driving”
05:00 Invasion Of Privacy!
05:11 What If The Algorithm Misinterprets The Data?!
07:11 “For Other Purposes”
08:25 “Kill Switch” For Violators
10:00 What Does “Impairment” Mean Under The Act?
11:04 “Driving Prevention”
12:32 What Is “Impaired Driving?”
13:33 Driver Alcohol Detection System For Safety
13:51 “Alcohol Lock”
15:35 Social Credit Scoring Systems
Mandatory breath tests should be conducted for every Congressman to be allowed into any Govt session. We have way too much legislation that must have been created by drunk lawmakers.
I love it, and while we're testing them we need to strap them down with a lie detector. LOL
Hey Trilobite, I’d like to amend your proposal. I’d add “or impaired” in addition to drunk. They surely do all kinds of drugs, LOL. They should be tested for those, too! Maybe BEFORE any alcohol testing. Well, except for Barbara Botox and Nancy Piglosi of California.
The drunker they are, the more they won't know if the bribe is really worth it or not.
I wrote my comment and read yours basically said the same thing
100% this. As the guy below says, mandatory drug and alcohol testing before any gov't official can take part in official business. Comparing the potential damage of a piss drunk behind the wheel Vs a group of lawmakers substantially impaired...it's not even close.
All police, CIA, FBI, DEA, ICE and all other government officers should have mandatory breath test before reporting for duty, and then every 4 hrs while on duty. Judges should do this before taking the bench, and congress and the senate should also have mandatory breathalyzer test every 4 hrs while working.
Where do I sign
Well. Since the majority of cops don't drink before work...
@@OGKenGthat's why he said every 4 hours during the shift as well
@@jl123ist
So, what reason would you tie up resources and conduct this kind of nonsense? Do you have any validation of reasoning to justify this? Is there some long history of cops showing up drunk or drinking on duty?
Or (and this is more self-evident), is this a retaliatory suggestion because some lawmaker floated a bill?
@@OGKenG there have been cases of officers drinking on the job for a long time. I've even seen one of them do it myself. And yes it is also in retaliation of their garbage they shouldn't get to do it to the American public unless they are subject to it themselves.
How in the hell has this not blown up??? I'm seeing this video 8 months from it's release and this is the first time I'm hearing about this. This NEEDS to be repealed!!! Everybody should forward this to the ACLU and complain to their congressman!!!!
People are sleeping...... as long as you don't mess with their lil bubble. Then everything is possible... then it's too late when they finally wake up......
Yes this is 💯 CROCK OF 💩!!!
Everyone was watching Johnny Depp and Amber Heard ...
The analogy of cooking the frog in a pot of water comes to mind
ACLU lmao that’s cute 😅
How has this not been taken to the supreme court?
ya they need get it passed
They aren't on our side.
Are you kidding me? The SCOTUS is not on your side.
SCOTUS is good but until the system is in place they won't take it up. There has to be an existing case in lower courts first.
@@danf2well it violates more than one constitutional amendment scotus absolutely should be striking this down as part of the checks n balancing its supposed to perform
This is not about reducing drunk driving or keeping you safe. This is about surveillance and control.
Bingo! Who drinks and drives more than the entitled in America. Its nothing more than more B.S. control.
100%
Yup.. they can kiss my butt! Not doing it.
A Rhode Island councilman was passed out cold in this car he tried to say he had sleep apnea. Reilly told officers there were no drugs in his car, the officers said they found crack laced with fentanyl along with other drug paraphernalia while searching his car. There was also a crack pipe beside him.
Idk I didn't hear that one but I know Paul Pelosi recently hit someone on Martha's vineyard while he was bombed. It isn't about drunk driving. It's all about control.
It all started with the Patriot Act. If you give up your freedoms for safety, you deserve neither.
Yep
*A lot of people handed over their freedom and their rights like scrap paper, when the coronavirus BS came along. Telling people how many parishioners can attend a house of worship? Who can run a food store and how many people can enter? How we vote?*
Sounds nice, but what have you done?
You deserve what you tolerate
@@joeskeptical4762we used to joke that church in an airplane was ok
My last job had this system installed in all the vehicles. I was monitored and the car told me when I was going too fast or if I had to sudden stop. I had to deal with a camera watching me and another looking at the road. Every week I had to endure my boss laughing at me every time I swore in Klingon about the traffic. I was actually glad that they fired me because I blocked the camera. I am now happily retired and don't have to put up with that crap.
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
They're going to know what you do, how you do it, and where you go! A bureaucrat dream come true!!
"They" already do. If your car has any form of "connectedness", the ECM and various sensors and GPS are sending data all the time. If you have a cell phone, even a 'dumb" phone, your location is tracked, your texts can be monitored, as can your voice calls. This was happening 20 years ago...
I bet there will also be the ability to remotely disable a vehicle.
Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Thank you very much for the cliche.
Patriot act and COVID mandates. Wake up people. We're not better off and we aren't safer.
@@kennixox262 why do you think it’s a cliche if it’s completely accurate? This is not a trivial matter! Are you a wanna be Authoritarian?
Yes, but he rode a horse drawn buggy. 😂
@@ChrisWatson762 Not an authoritarian but everyone in the comment venues uses that same phrase. Try to come up with something original yourself.
They ought to pass a bill into law that requires congressment both state and Federal to take a breathalyzer before they can cast a vote.
State and federal Congressman? I think they should start making people take a breathalyzer before they post comments.
@@skankhunt3624 If people like you had their way you'd make them submit to a full body cavity search before they posted.
It's important to know which lawmakers sponsored this and who supported it.
@@FishBait-ug6ek do you support people driving under the influence?
@Skankhunt36 No, I don't. However, I also don't support the erosion of our liberties via AI, Compliments of Congress. There's too much spin-off on this.
*My brother is an attorney in Maine, and I’ve warned him about what is happening re: social control and the digital cashless currency- and his reaction was an audible sneer, after which he told me it was all “bull snot,” and “none of that crap is actually happening,” like I’m a dumb ignorant kid.*
*Not that it matters, but I’m an educated medical professional with two degrees- so his reply was stunning in its brazen arrogance and utter ignorance.*
*I simply said “You seem quite certain- but if your “certainty” comes from what you see on TV, I suggest not watching ANY TV “news” any more, because it’s making you ignorant,” and I advised him to start opening his eyes (and his mind), and looking around a bit more.*
*He won’t, of course.*
Our gov is owned by china and takes its orders from them.
There are SO many, too many people who don't WANT to open their eyes and see what's really happening, they're too afraid of what they'll see
@handynoth I was told there's bounties being placed on Attorney's heads that hold to that creepy life draining mentality
How do we fight against this?! This is absurd! Why & how do these bills get passed under the radar!? I never voted on this!
revolution or bust
2A
It’s not about drunk driving…it’s about control
Yep. Fits right in with 15 minute cities.
"You'll own nothing and be happy". "Santa" Klause Schwab
dont forget money,
how much do you think its going to cost to have somthing like this installed? then every month you have to take it in for maintenance? not to mention all the hidden fees of owning one even though you are forced to? My brother had to have one of these on his car from a dui and let me tell you, if they force this on the public its going to be a huge money maker, just like the smog scam on cars.
That is a fact
Comrades, it's all in your best interest. Trust your government 😳
This isn't about drunk driving, it's about government sticking their noses into the lives of the citizens. This will be used to enforce laws outside of drunk driving, and will leave citizens with no place to have privacy whatsoever. This is another step of tyranny against the citizens, and should be opposed on all fronts. ANY company that abides by this should be boycotted to the fullest extent.
It is about big business! We have to pay for this crap?
This is what I see. They are going to limit mobility and monitor what you do. The open highways are essential for a free poeple. This technology will essentially give a government agency absolute authoritarian control of free movement.
One more thing. Driving is not a privilege! It's a right. You pay for the road. You pay for the equipment you use on the road. You pay, and you pay! And what you pay for is your right to use. We have traffic rules and regulations, but those are for the safe and effective flow of traffic. And nothing more.
@@stevengagnon4777traffic lights do the same thing...on a lower level....
This is about out of control lobbying (MADD). They claim to be “against drunk driving “ but have lobbied for people already convicted of drunk driving to (in lieu of having a suspended license) be required to install breathalyzers. So you are required to install it… you aren’t allowed to take a plain suspension.
When you follow the money you see that MADD quietly invested in these companies that monitor and install these devices which they then lobbied courts to reverse their original laws requiring suspensions and force install these devices instead. They have now increased these businesses revenue by billions in a few years.
What a nightmare!!
Swerving to avoid hitting an animal or a person would shut down your vehicle.
I recall a D.A. situation where shutting down my car would have left me at the mercy of my abuser.
🤔🤔🤔
That is what I was thinking. A person trying to escape a dangerous situation and not being able to get away. What if a person is out camping and has some drinks; a bear shows up? Now the car won't start.
The first thing I thought of is a medical emergency where I'm driving my loved one to the hospital and swerving (of course) more than usual!
Jeff, PLEASE continue to follow this and tell us why no one is challenging this clear violation to our constitutional rights.
Because any challenge would be struck with a simple phrase
"Driving is a privlage not a right"
Only politicians should have mandatory daily breath tests and weekly drug tests . They should also have IQ tests and polygraphs regularly. They should be audited constantly. The results should be posted publically
I agree
So let it be written, So let it be done.
Truth
Yeah I think everybody would agree to that except for congress itself
Polygraph? You know pathological liars will ace those things, right?
If Congress cannot protect our rights then we need new people in Congress.
If some people want to be ruled, that is a decision they should live with, and they have no right to force me to suffer with them.
My car has “lane assist” in it, which almost killed me. I was able to finally disable it and it is permanently off!
When I brought it into the dealership after the above incident, they gave me a bulletin from Mazda, stating it was a “known” problem.
Cars do collect data on your driving. Cops need a search warrant to tap that information. My car shows the current speed limit, BUT it also picks up speed limits from the signs on the service road. At one part of I-29, where the actual speed limit is 65, my car states it is 25mph. That is why I cannot do one of the insurance company discount plug ins.
We have given these ppl way to much power.....
How about drug and alcohol test for all government employees?
They ALWAYS exclude themselves
Just elected government officials
Like Ronald Reagan said, "The worst thing that you can hear is, we're from the government and we're here to help."
He also said, the problem with government is government!
...And then he proceeds to raise the drinking age to 21 (while not remembering doing so).
I always liked Reagan. I was 7 thinking “He’s a nice guy”.
unfortunately those welfare mommas and illegal immigrants are happy to see the gov giving them freebies
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
The slippery slope began with GM and OnStar I knew this was going to happen
Yep. Me too.
I just saw this for the first time. Just imagine if someone is trying to get away from somebody who is trying to kill them. However, this law needs to be challenged before the US Supreme Court. Unlawful Serch and seizure. I hope the Supreme Court would squash the police state.
Maybe there will be settings for "fleeing an abuser" or "medical emergency" that can be activated when necessary?
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
@rjstegbauer yeah can you just imagine, Wait a minute before you kill me. I need to find my selector switch and then find the fleeing a murderer setting on my selector switch. Or telling your loved one, don't bleed too fast. I can't get the selector switch to work 😫
re-vo-lu-tion. It's time. No taxation without representation. In case anyone hasn't noticed, our "representatives" are such in name only.
Then you have to support candidates that dont take any corporate money and want to take money out of politics. No dark money and low caps on donations. If you cant buy politicians then they have to answer to the voters. My guess is that you didnt support these plans and vote for Bernie Sanders. He was the only presidential candidate to want to take money out of politics and rebuke corporations and still is. This is why the media ñies about him...he wants to remove corporate control over our media so they are free to report the truth.
Oh, they're representatives alright. The real question is who's interests do they represent? Some of them are legitimate and actually represent the American people, but far too many represent other interests, such as corporate interests, foreign interests or ideological interests.
Wow, considering that 84 of our legislators have been caught for drunk driving in the past year, we need to replace ALL of them! We hire them to conduct commerce for the country, not create laws that violate OUR rights! Such hypocrites!
Which right would this violate?
4th Amendment
The 84 number is not right.
And he is lying. If you do not get the full text read out loud and a source, its a lie.
@@JRBendixen Uh oh, your demorat is showing! Only 'they' can accuse without proof, so I say to you, "if I gave you a list of the names not one of the accused would step forward. I said they were CAUGHT I didn't say convicted or prosecuted, oh, didn't you know? EVERYONE from the president on down to the lowly government clerk, has immunity in one form or another. Guess who doesn't...US! Open your eyes. Oh and here is another good one 19 have been ACCUSED of writing bad checks...71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit rating, so yes, and I ask... who voted the criminals be in charge of the nut house?
@@skankhunt3624 The right to travel.
Is there any effort being made to take this to the Supreme Court and squashed as unconstitutional?
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
It is appalling that they think our freedom is something to play with. This idea was not well thought out. Besides the disregard for our rights, mechanical things beak and malfunction. Electric "self driving" cars have taught us that software can do things that lead to accidents. If you were shaky from a large cut, loosing blood, and were trying to get to the hospital, this would not be a good idea. Imagine washing your interior windows with a window cleaner that has alcohol as an ingredient... In an emergency you would not be able to move your car. I often "straighten" the curves so my passengers are more comfortable and my lane departure alarm goes off. How would this system react? What happens when your vehicle gets old and the thing breaks? Boeing found out the hard way that software does not fix every problem, adding more complexity to an already complex machine is not smart.
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
They should make it mandatory to do a complete financial and personal audit of anyone running for Congress - then do it every quarter while they are in office. Have to explain where every dime they receive is accounted for.
💯
Lol go learn about financial disclosure. They do have to report things. Go look it up. You can go look up every congress member. Duh. The fact you don't understand it just shows you know nothing.
Lame take on your part.
@@billyyank5807
They are all covering for each other.
The systems they have to report to are inadequate and abused and run by their families and friends who ALL steal from the public.
Asking cookie monster to guard the cookies doesn't make sense does it?
Their system makes dam sure honest folks don't get in , you must be stupid to even write or think that there is anything fair about a bunch of criminal reporting to each other. CLOWN!
@@billyyank5807
It needs to be done independently. Seriously, if we cant trust our politicians and the people that work for them, what makes you think we can trust their record keeping? Its the same crap when police departments investigate themselves and find they did nothing wrong. We cannot trust our public servants anymore. We need to stand behind them and watch everything they do like an alcoholic taking a piss test. Full transparency, no exceptions. If they refuse, then that will be taken as their resignation and they will get thrown out into the street like the bums they are. Our public _servants_ need to stop exhibiting behavior above their station.
Well considering no one even knows the majority of their money comes from the billions in bribes they all take from corporations each year it wouldn't matter
All laws should be applied to all politicians first for several years, before it can be applied to the general public.
Yes great idea along with mandatory fiscal laws requiring them to report all tax spending directly to the public.
Excellent idea !!
Yes I support.
agreed
especially Congress, since they actually MAKE LAWS
LYFT drivers taking drunk drivers home from bars will have to stop so that they are not penalized.
I assume this part of the law will be challenged to the Supreme Court Level eventually. Hopefully they will make the car manufacturers recall all vehicles to disable or remove these devices
The deaths caused by drunk drivers are a much lesser concern than the complete demolition of our privacy and rights by insane politicians, bureaucrats, and authoritarians.
That's right, don't murder our freedom! Lol!
And they know that. This has nothing to do with dwi and everything to do with control 😒 when will they finally give us the label we are now. Communists...
EXACTLY!! This is just beyond crazy insane!!!!!!
The deaths caused by drunk drivers are a much lesser concern than my complete disregard for your right to life!
Right or those same politicians letting killers out of prison early
We need to ban high capacity congressional terms!
Or 1772
Buy drive trains from wrecked cars now. They'll be worth a fortune in the future to swap out these Minority Report engines and trans.
@Think Casting hell yea, and if you cant you better learn how to fix your old cars now
@@thinkcasting3182 this is just the first step, once it’s in effect their next logical step will be to try and incrementally make that illegal
Dont forget the information is also being sent to your insurance company
FORMER CAPT USAF, FORT WORTH,glad y'all are doing& getting word out please keep doing what y'all are doing 🇮🇱⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
These politicians who came up with this BS are a threat to public safety! We need to get rid of everyone of them! This is outrageous and totally unconstitutional!
Yeah...... We need to second amendment them!
Commercial liens
@@waktosha7378 okay fed
@@John_Doe27
???
Where in the Constitution does it say you have the Right to drive?
This law should be taken to the Supreme Court. It's practically illegal search.
They are too busy , they're busy with cases like a dog toy that resembles a jack Daniels bottle, that's a real thing 🐕🦺
Not the Supreme Court in place now!
Do you actually think anybody in positions of power are gonna help us? The answer is no no their not. The general public is on there own.
We need to protest
@@allussin2076 ok set that up
What if the car pulls over to the side of the road on a road with no shoulder. Or the car stops when you are being tailgated or in heavy traffic, or going fast. This is crazy.
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
Imagine driving a mountain pass in CO and your car pulls off the side of the road and sends you 2000 feet down the side of the mountain. Imagine the car pulling you off to the side of the highway and you freeze to death in the winter time. I can see a huge after market demand to disable all this crap. Even cops have a hard time determining a DUI.
They ought to mandate all politicians get mandatory cognitive tests.
Good luck on that theyll cry ablism ie guy who stroked out and got elected anyway in Pa
😂
@@mobilemechanics6565 --- Unfortunately, Fetterman is my US Senator! 😯
@@mobilemechanics6565 You really think he was 'elected'?
@@jsivco3sivco785 My condolences 🙏
Why not just put a KAREN in every car to quip, argue second guess
and call the FBI any time a school board meeting is mentioned
That is the Craziest Thing I've Ever Heard! I own several Car's, but I like driving my 2003 knowing there is nothing in that old truck! I even drove it for a year without a Dash Cluster because it stopped working so I took it out!
Why do those in government always want to watch us? It's really creepy. Lawsuits need to be filed
Because *they* are really creeps!
It's illegal the supreme court already ruled video surveillance on private property is a constitutional right violation!! A vehicle is private property!! So if a government agency camera is illegal on private property then I 100% guarantee that a breathalyzer is violating them same rights!! Always stand up for your rights!!
To control us, China comes in all the tools are in place. 😮
No one is going to actually stand up. They never do.
They are chronic narcissist's. So disgusting. Let's stop this somehow.😮
Imagine driving down a rough road dodging potholes and the Feds shut down your car.
Or someone trying to run you off the road in a road rage situation.
California.......
Or a deer, or need to avoid another car or pedestrian.
Any and every single one of them would kill their own mothers for a dollar.
Imagine your in a situation where you need to leave your home let’s say to get to work and your car won’t start because you used mouth wash. Or let’s say your pregnant wife starts going into labor right after you lay down for bed and your car won’t start because you had just brushed your teeth 😢
What if you have to slam on the brakes on a lonely country road because a crazy deer jumps out in front of your car but the stupid monitoring system deems that as reckless driving ?
Imagine filling up at the gas station and while you grab the pump your hands feel some mystery liquid on the pump, and after finishing you get back into your car and put on some hand sanitizer and your car flags you as drunk after sensing the alcohol in the sanitizer and a cop shows up.
Pre-2026 & Classic cars are about to Sky rocket in value . Huh?
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
My question is why no lawyer ever challenges the Constitutionality of these laws. This is a literal violation of both the 4th & 14th Amendments.
because 99% or lawyers vote dem and dems are mean and nasty
it has to be put into effect then it can be challenged
@@robertabbott6736 it is in effect. Manufacturer are already building the systems. It needs to be challenged right now. Don't wait until you force all car mfgs to go bankrupt due to no one buying your trash.
@@kevinroberts781 i do not disagree with you....but its not mandatory until 2026. i still dont see why it cannot be done before car companies install this trash. and just another reason to not buy a ford
They never read what they vote on.
Tyranny always starts with your safety.
Well said.
Very true
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
The first thing I'm thinking is that finance companies will have access to that kill switch as well. They already have systems that can be installed by lenders or dealers for high risk borrowers (mostly buy here, pay here places) but now it's going to apply to everyone. One day late on your car payment, and it doesn't start.
Kill Switch for Non-payment? Had it in Europe about 10 years + now. Good analysis.
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
Thanks for the heads up. We need to keep ahead of these things that happen on their own. Who the he'll is in charge of this crap? We have to gain control of our lives
People on cell phones have caused more accidents in two years than people drinking in 20 years
Yet your cops drive on a cell phone and nothing is done to stop them
In Florida we have a no cell while driving. But on one pays any attorney to the law. I see it all the time
Attention to the law
This will monitor for cell use also no doubt.
About 400 people a year die as a result of drivers using cell phones. An average 37 Americans are killed by drunk drivers EVERY SINGLE day. In 2021 , the most recent year for data collection, 13,384 people were killed by drunk drivers. Both using a cell phone and driving impaired are dangerous, but there is literally no contest between which behavior causes more unnecessary deaths. If you choose to drink and drive, you are a menace to every law abiding driver that you share the road with and you should have your driving PRIVILEGE revoked.
Until people push back on these criminals in charge, nothing will ever change.. this is nothing about drunk driver's, it's called surveillance..
Agreed. We The People have the power!!
But I mean who wants to actually put forth the effort.
Yes, probably another tactic to turn off our automobile if we exceed our allotted mileage.
Yup
Ah, a whack job conspiracy theorist.
It's all about control, we are quickly headed to having only 2 classes, the incredibly greedy and the incredibly needy.
Pre-2026 & Classic cars are about to Sky rocket in value . Huh?
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
That is terrifying...
"Public Safety will always be the alibi of tyrants." -Albert Camus
It has nothing to do with drunk driving it's all about control
Its the same way for truck drivers. They moniter us all day everyday. Companies put cameras everywhere, its ridiculous
Yup -
Not as an employee, as a Private Citizen--->If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
These tyrants in our government needs to be abolished
USE the 2nd Amendment, Bill Of Rights, and the Communist Control Act of 1954
YES, let’s also abolish all traffic signage, seat belts rules, and do away with road dividing painted lines, and get rid of speedometers in all vehicles, etc.Driving is “OUR GOD GIVEN RIGHT”.Horses are born without speedometers, right? Let’s all go back to the Wild West era.
Repeal all of the Democrat omnibus bills, and then reinstate only the real infrastructure parts.
@@tulw2728 To employ your rhetorical strategy in reverse,....
So let's implant monitoring chips in everyone's brains, like the WEF wants, and when the tech is developed enough, let's control people's thoughts, so they can't think criminal thoughts. It will be a perfect society with no crime! Of course, whatever perfect leaders are in power at the time will certainly be morally developed enough so that they will use their power only in the most benign ways.
-- The Wild West is a better option.
@@grizzlygrizzle
Repeal all type or kind of governance, we all are adults. Let's live free. Just like in the wild west when there was no sheriff in town. 🤠🤠🤠🤠
I rented a car to drive from the south midwest.
The car had a lane assist feature.
Mapquest took me on a route with construction. So traffic lanes were paved on what was previous the side of roads, while construction occurred in the middle lanes.
I was constantly fighting the lane assist as it tried to devert me back to a lane under construction.
This stupid " lane assist software " tried to make me run over obstacles in the road.
I am surprised, I was wasn't charged with car undercarriage ! damage.
Thank you for taking the time to educate people on this
Tyranny comes in many forms.
Such tyranny! You realize driving is a privilege and not a right, correct? Also, learn what tyranny is because nothing about this even resembles tyranny. A bill was passed with majority votes and both parties involved in the process per our system of creating laws in the United States of America and it is affecting a privilege of Americans and not a basic human right or a Constitutional right for that matter. It is not unjust or oppressive government power, it is not handed down by a single ruler with absolute power, and it doesn't come from the office of someone with absolute power. English words have meaning and you should learn what those meanings are before using them or you may just expose how ignorant you are. The reason our country is so screwed right now is because of the lack of basic education like this and people becoming outraged and divided over shit that isn't true.
I mostly want mandatory breath tests for all congress members....every day.
Every 30 seconds.
Thiis is real and drug test like athletes.
You mean blood test most of them mfers are on cocaine and breath test wouldn't pick it up
We should demand mandatory drug tests for politicians before they enter the building and before they vote!
Once you need to 'break the law' in an emergency is when you will feel the injustice of this intrusive system.
We as a nation need to take a stand against these laws!!
You can by becoming a state National.. Y'all gotta wake up and do something.
Don’t worry there will be a major decline in new vehicle sales. Used cars will be worth more so stock up now, and buy Uber and Lyft stock.
@@TheGhost2612000 I can understand buying older/current cars with a day older technology but why uber and lift?
why the very regular cars but ones that are more worn out even more used by uber and lyft?
And people won't fight against it.
People wish somebody else would change it for them. People take no responsibility for making changes so changes don't happen bcause they want somebody ELSE to fight for justice.
People Are too lazy to fight for change so instead we just get mad and whine. We WILL just accept what happens. PEOPLE complain, they whine, they want things to be reasonable but people are to lazy to make that happen.
Yes,vote Libertarian.
@@tacvolun3570 more people will use Uber and Lyft is what my prediction is.
The really scary aspect of this law is the precedent it makes for spying on citizens in places where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If they can install mandatory monitoring systems in our cars, then they could just as easily 'justify' installing monitoring systems in our homes. This law needs to be strangled in the crib.
Apparently you no longer have reasonable expectations of privacy 😢
You have no right to privacy, your supreme Court took care of that.
@@danielstadden1149 We still have the right to privacy. Just because a government violates our rights doesn't mean the right goes away. Rights can't be taken, only infringed.
@@jameshanna8762 Agreed
@@jameshanna8762 Who gave these rights? Might makes rights.
These people have gone batshit crazy.
What kind of "punishment" will be given to those who "violate"?
The stupidity of the people to allow the political parties to get away with this is a sign that our country is so far gone
You hit the nail on the head! If this info doesn't wake people up then I don't have much hope. George Orwell you tried to warn us
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
This needs to go before court before it's even implemented. This is absolutely unconstitutional, not to mention irritating.
Hello ,,
This became Law a few years ago,
It will be mandatory by 2024 or 2026 ,
Next they'll say they need cameras everywhere on/in your property to stop domestic violence.
Go before a corrupted court that isn't interested in protecting rights or individual liberties. The other part of ROE vs WADE was EVERYONE LOST THEIR RIGHT TO PRIVACY....this is clearly a privacy isssue, that in large part has already been vacated.....a right lost or oprression of Anyone is rights lost and oppression of Everyone.
This is too be implemented January 1st in all new 2025 vehicles....this was the latest I heard ...it was passed in a bill bundle, by Democrats and Republicans...
@@desireegoulett69
You are on the wrong, line here ,not talking about taking of life! ....this is about freedom of travel!
The facial recognition software will also be able to determine the person or person's in the vehicle, thereby allowing the software/AI or monitoring system to also be able to identify that person exclusively...beyond a vehicle being registered to a specific owner......
Thank you for sharing this information. I will never blue tooth my phone into my car ever again.
@jon
If you've been jabbed, you won't have to, your body already emits a Mac address. 😮
Imagine your politics ...or faith is not favored ..who would control your mobility? Or monitor where you are at all the time? How long you were parked at a bar, or out too dinner, with recording/ video devices in the car, would it automatically link to your phone and monitor your calls? ....there is a lot to be concerned and angry about!
Not a freaking chance that I would submit to this kind of ABUSE. ALL of us need to stand up and REFUSE TO COMPLY with government officials who REFUSE TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSTITUTION.
Do you have a cell phone? Then you already submit to this 'violation of privacy'. And you obviously have no clue what is and is not in the constitution or you wouldn't say ignorant inaccurate statements like that. Here is a little fact for you, just because you 'think' something is in the constitution or you 'think' you have a right does not make it true. Just like 'thinking' an election was stolen doesn't make it true. Facts matter in reality, believe it or not. And how exactly is implementing technology to prevent impaired driving (which is a privilege, not a right) ABUSE? LOL Such snowflakes I swear.
@@Itsmeandadd Unfortunately half the country will comply and happily support government overreach in the name of "saving democracy." The government is not the problem. The problem is half the country happily supports bigger government.
Amen! Hell No we won't do it, we will make them do it though! Oh all of this chit is going to be turned on these evil demons! It's going to be hysterical! Hella comedy for us to watch as they "Go to Jail, Go Directly To Jail! Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200.00 Dollars"!
Let's send these Bastards to China, we do not want China in our country, if they want it, they go! Let's start shipping them off to China!
Since when have we signed up to be China, We caught them selling our country to China, isn't this what this? No, no, no, no, no they don't!
The seat belt laws had the very same reaction. But it has proven to have saved millions of lives and still continues saving lives. I support this bill a 100%. If you are drunk, you have just put yourself OUT OF SERVICE.🤠🤠🤠🤠. Neeeeeext!
Exactly, and that includes Covid Communist laws. The Covid crap worked so well, I would bet my car that there will be a new "disease" coming out between now, and the 2024 election.
The Federal Government needs to be slashed back to the few powers enumerated in the Constitution. Any unconstitutional law must be abolished and the authors of said unconstitutional removed from office. Abolish qualified immunity for all government employees.
We couldn’t even keep who does and doesn’t deserve rights, do you reasonably expect normies to do anything but cope?
Democrats wouldn’t allow that 💯😹
You've clearly never read article 1 section 8 clause 18 and didn't pay attention to what the Marshall Court stated in McCullough v. Maryland.
Well hello, that's what Ted Cruz was advocating for. But nobody heard Ted Cruz because blah blah blah Trump
@@kellychristus2496
Convention of states
Would the price of this added equipment be added to the price of the car being bought.If the person doesn't drink alcohol, why should they have to incur the cost of this equipment .
In Alaska, a special ferry run used to be scheduled just before the start of the legislative session each year to transport legislator's cars from the south central area of the state (Anchorage region; highest population) to Juneau (the capital). The reason for this was that many of the legislators had DWI convictions and they could not drive through Canada to Haines, the location with the shortest ferry trip to Juneau.
I hope everyone protest this like they did Bud Light and Target.
How? If every new car sold in the United States from 2024 onward has these mechanisms built in, how do you protest them? How do you protest them in twenty years when these are the only cars available for majority purchase?
The time to protest was BEFORE the Democrap run House, Senate and WH PASSED this law.
It is NOW law. Remember that in 2024
@@nicoleking772 this is republican shit stop lying
@@nicoleking772 this can be taken to SCOTUS. It's unconstitutional.
Argonnosi, the same way people protested Detroit in the 70’s, Which in turn prompted new laws to resolve the problems.
we the people who abide freedom, are obliged to make congress reverse this vile legislation. also, boycott all companies making these vehicles.
Amen 👍💪
That might be their plan they already don't want us driven
>
YES! All Congress critters who voted for this bill should be fired by the voters in the next election.
>
Won't work. ALL vehicle manufacturers will be required to comply with the law. I suppose we could all refuse to buy new cars and limit our purchases to used cars only. That might put the manufacturers out of business. But the problem is not the manufacturers -- the problem is the Congress and the President.
ford is packed with unsold f 150's now wait to we stop buying them in mass. yes im pissed they abide instead of fighting this. 80k for a snitch truck?
@@thewaywardwind548 Here's the thing. If they're insidious enough, they'll impose super high taxes on older vehicles, or ban them outright.
Japan has done something similar where if a car is 5 years old or older, it's taxed to heaven and back.
Part 2 I’ve uncovered a trend in my city of local bars and restaurants that serve alcohol but not so much the big corporate chains that these establishments are 2 separate corporations. First corporation owns the properties, buildings and equipment. Second corporation owns the business name and most likely soft on hand daily inventory only. It’s my opinion this to protect them from major liability lawsuits if they over serve a customer and said customer goes out and causes an accident or inflicts body harm on somebody or property while being intoxicated. So the 1st corporation is a leasing company to the 2nd corporation. So if the worst happens the 2nd corporation declares bankruptcy closes down and just looses the soft inventory. Then the principal corporation owner just starts back up under a new corporation with the restaurant or bars name again. The big looser in this is the plaintiff in all this because at the end of all this litigation finds out their is vary little if any hard assets to recover from all this.
If congress can pass a law that makes surveillance inside my car mandatory, where I have a "reasonable expectation of privacy", how long until they try to do it inside my home?
For every law they make against the citizens, we need to make laws against them. Start with them giving themselves raises without citizens consent.
Why keep making laws for the same garbage the people keep voting back in the first place? 😂
The entire government need to fear it's people, not vice versa. Only way to fix all this bullshxt is, "We The People" need to FIRE THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT and start from scratch. Also, need to cut the government in half, set term limits for them all and everything needs to be cut off the moment they are done. We the people should not have to pay for they're security once they are done, voted out, retired, etc etc etc. And we need to have a civil war against all the libturds on top of it. The demoncrappic party are the main cause of all this mess. And George Soros and his family need to be taken care of too 🎤 drop
They have to drive new cars to hello it will affect them once enough go to jail then will go back to how it was in the 70s how it should of stayed ...madd is a joke
This is AI based. Much kike everything else.
Everyone stop paying taxes. Everybody. Buy silver with your savings and bury it. Everybody.
Good idea but it will never happen.
We need an infrastructure bill that monitors politicians and government workers.
And POE LEE ZEZ
The infrastructure money and inflation bill money are going to basically California for water supplies. Yes again,, the country has again bailed out Cali with covid money, and two more Bill's after wards. Get a clue ,, wake up America , Cali is draining America.
A-hem... We the people with our vote ARE the monitors. We just need to vote bye bye to politicians after one term. FJB has done NOTHING in his life except hold a political job.
@@mfgc2610 ...the problem is vote fraud. If the democrats dont like the potential outcome, they just cheat to gain and keep power. Our vote means nothing in the face of the mass vote fraud that the democrats have.
@@mfgc2610 Actually I don't believe in "voting". When you "vote", you're just giving consent for evil tyrants to rule over you. And yes, I already know I just triggered a bunch of people. I've heard all the stupid dumb arguments why you need to "vote" and after 30 years of studying this topic, that's the conclusion I've reached. Positive change will NEVER EVER happen because of "voting". The ONLY hope for humanity is obsoleteness of tyrannical strongholds. The ONLY way for that to happen is QUIT participating in the deeds of evil entities. By far the best place to start, is actually very doable and the tyrants won't even bother you {usually} and that is QUIT USING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM !!! By rendering the Public education system obsolete, you have made a HUGE step towards a true freedom and liberty society, as well as a more educated society and more productive.
So many people hairsplitting "what if this what if that" minutia, when it was game over the second we gave the State jurisdiction into our property (property taxes, registrations etc). This is just the next logical step.
It’s 5/24/2024 today and I haven’t heard anything about this yet and it’s a YEAR AFTER THIS VIDEO CAME OUT. Thank you for watching what’s going on with our laws. I’m going to see what I can find in the morning. It’s 348 am where I am. I need some sleep. I’m shocked. Well, there are a lot of old cars out there that won’t have that intrusive device in them. Don’t buy any 2024 FORDs or VOLVOs. Damn! It’s always something. How did they sneak that in there?
All members of Congress should be required to have their tax records examined by IRS agents.
Why would you think that the one agency with more guns than the Marines, that exclusively trains their door kickers to raid single family homes would ever investigate the people who gave them that power honestly?
Starting with Nancy Pelosi
Should be checked by private accountants, not another government agency
The FBI should be disbanded, if we want a free country.
Learn about public records. YOU can check that information.
We need new politicians that understand how creepy this is. They always use "safety" to monitor us.
Big Brother...He loves us and cares about us.
Corporations should be permitted to harm people without consequence? Or should government legislate for public safety?
Whenever you see them do something for "national security reasons" be suspicious and concerned.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
~Ben Franklin~
This is so creepy
what if you are on icy road or interstate. and the kill switch kicks in and abruptly stops the car or sharply veers your car to the side of the road. that will result in very serious accidents.
I participated in a focus group over 15 years ago that tested consumer reactions to these same invasions of privacy. Insurance companies have pressed for similar data collection to prevent paying claims. Blanket laws that affect everyone to avoid improper behavior of a few should not be allowed.
First the RESTRICT ACT, now the dystopian future hidden inside the "infrastructure" bill. Never trust the government if they say theyre doing something for "national security reasons."
Usually stuff like this is hidden or reworded as some new invention or feature. And often people fall for it without reading the fine print. Like when those new smart thermostats cam out in early 2010’s. Of course people were stoked about controlling their air conditioning from the cellphones or pc. And had eco friendly systems in place. Of course in the fine print it mentioned that once you sign on the power company can have direct access to the thermostat and over ride any settings at anytime for what they call saving power on the grid. Now you have Biden pushing the ev cars on everyone.
Well it only wins if people buy them. I'd boycott purchasing a car with this type of surveillance, but I don't know how many others would. Certainly they'll repeal this requirement real quick if it starts ruining EV sales.
No don’t trust the government they say ANYTHING..
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help. " President Ronald Reagan
Mean while you're taking advice from a government official
“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety” -Benjamin Franklin
Here is an issue with the car taking over steering. My new Subaru has it and tries to take over the steering when I’m on an ice road. It’s very dangerous because it tries to basically kill me. Luckily I can turn it off. If I can’t turn it off then no more skiing for us. The new tech is not smart and it makes it unsafe like never before.
This will be going to the court system all the to the us court system. And all those systems will need to be removed at the government expense. Thing about this. 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
Government Expense?........... You mean at OUR expense. Gov't has no money. They must TAKE it from us first to have ANY money.
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.
They should make it mandatory for police officers, Congress, senate, doctors, lawyers, judges and more before they go to work each day
I agree... including an average Joe.
That’s a great idea, it should be tested and validated on those groups of people for 2 years while they weed out the software bugs.
Exactly if you work in the public you get tested its really easy
All goverment workers down to the local dog catcher!
Make it for everyone and I’m down with it.
I SEE TONS OF LAWSUITS COMING WITH THIS
Its a Federal Regulation, you as a Citizen, do not get to oppose such a mandate. Its like the Masks, either you do it, or there will be consequences.
I live in Australia - people are very used to random drug and alcohol tests at roadside, all hours of the day and night, at different places on the roads and highways. I am surprised they don't just mandate breathalyzers in every new and used vehicle. What I am opposed to is the use of roadside FST's done so often by police. I would not be opposed to these, given the amount of drunk drivers on the roads. Those should be outlawed in favor of breathalyzers and oral drug testing tests up front.
Yup - AND there are no field sobriety tests in AU either. The US is the only country that refuses to use the technology to determine impairment, opting to harassed the crap out of everyone, and arrest as many as possible, impaired or not. It's a ridiculous system ~
I'm glad you made a different type of video. Strategically, it might just be your most important post so far. Lots of great comments below - some suggest making Congress, cops, judges... live with it themselves for a few years before it goes into affect for everyone, but I don't want to open the door to accepting such a system after authorities live w8th it for ANY period of time. Just like income tax creates jobs for tax lawyers and H&R Block drones, some creative entrepreneur will (hopefully) figure out how to spoof the system. Disabling it is sure to get you charged with a big fat fine and a felony (check the penalties for not having a tax stamp for your short-barreled rifle or DIY suppressor), but even if that happens, given the illegality, it will certainly be EXPENSIVE, like street drugs. A new underground industry is born. We're living in the real 1984/Minotity Report already. Smart phones already provide your GPS (or nearest tower) location constantly. Interesting that Biden & company were inspired by communist China. Where is Robert A. Levy when you need him? If the 'service' were strictly opt-in or an option on a new car and used car buyers had the RIGHT to opt out, I think that would be an acceptable compromise.
Imagine you are driving in cold weather and this thing decides you are drunk, pulls you over and will not allow you to start the car to use the heater. Insane.
they say youre drunk if you had breathe mnts or orange juice or literally anything.. its insane..
Yes snow icy roads make the seem like you’re driving isn’t good and will shut u down in the blizzard
This may very well end up taking more lives than it saves.
@@davidgates1122 That’s not unusual at all, Congress critters aren’t smart enough to understand second order effects
@godbyone we just will take the breathalyzer out immediately. Rednecks ain't gonna stand for this shit lol
I hope this law will be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
You and me both!
This country is becoming nazi Germany.....
It will not bc. It does not exist. He lied.
@@JRBendixen Before typing you fact check yourself a simple search of the Bill would show you some facts. Since your lazy or stupid or both I did it for you.
The policy is outlined in section 24220, titled "Advanced Impaired Driving Technology," starting on page 1,066.
The policy dictates that within three years, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, should do the following : "issue a final rule prescribing a Federal motor vehicle safety standard... that requires passenger motor vehicles manufactured after the effective date of that standard to be equipped with advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology."
According to the bill, this technology should do the following:
"Passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired; and prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if an impairment is detected;"
"Passively and accurately detect whether the blood alcohol concentration of a driver of a motor vehicle is equal to or greater than the blood alcohol concentration described in section 163(a) of title 23, United States Code; and prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if a blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit is detected."
Or a combination of the two.
@@JRBendixen : It does exist. I have seen the legislation, and read what he talked about.
Which is why I've said that people should simply not buy new cars after 2026.
What happens if a driver uses hand sanitizer or an alcohol wipe? What if you are using the vehicle off-road or where sudden collision avoidance maneuvers are required? What about driving in snow or weather related slippery conditions where automated vehicle take-over could be deadly (on a mountain road avoiding a rockslide for example)?
Why is no one talking about this or more importantly DOING something about it?!?!
We need to start following and recording our representatives constantly. Immediately tired of them writing laws that don't apply to them.
So, if I sanitize my hands before I get in my car what happens?
youre not tired of it.
If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.