I alternate between both methods. Sometimes I move the finger sometimes I keep it up straight. So we uphold the Sunnah and not lose it. At this point I feel both methods have their proofs so I uphold both. May Allah guide us to the truth.
Allah knows best what Albani knew and what is true. I used to get in these debates but most people are just looking for arguements and disagreements. Personally, I look to the real Salaf for my answers, according to what knowledge has been conveyed to us. In addition to that, I know that one who is not trained and learned directly from a legitimate alam can very easily misinterpret what is said in any book and therefore practice incorrectly. This can also open the door to misleading others as well. According to Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveler), which is a very thorough book related to Shafii fiqh and their teachings, Imam Bayhaqi and Imam Dawud discussed this matter and initially it was thought that there was a disagreement. That is until the movement of the finger mentioned in hadith was explained to be moving from a position of laying flat with the other fingers on top of the thigh to the position of pointing up. The moving of the finger did not mean wagging, wiggling, e.t.c. Since this info is much older and closer to the source, comes from orthodox Salafs and is more commonly accepted as the correct understanding and methodology, then this is what I follow. I question anyone who comes along hundreds of years later; be they a shaykh or kalif. In addition to all that, the scholars say kushu should be sought at all times during salat and this means refraining from excessive, unnecessary movements. Wa Allahu alam.
omg!!! mashallah mashallah he is telling the same thing which i say and sometimes blamed for refusing to follow the ulema in some rulings where there are stronger evidences brought forward by ulema of different school of thought. salaam from your brother for kolkata India.
Wallahi Mufti said the truth. There are so many so called salafis blindly following sheikh Al Albani and being the most stubborn. Always study yourself and follow a fatwa and respect other fatwas
@@quadriahnomuyiwa9262 LoL no. Though I follow Sheikh Al Albani's view on this but most scholars don't agree with this. Also majority minority doesn't matter when it comes to Fiqh unless there is a clear cut Ijma.
Moving the finger is the relied-upon position of the Mālikī madhhab based upon the actions of the people of al-Madīnah. Therefore, to say that this action has no basis in the Sunnah is incorrect. And we respect those scholars, in their ijtihād, which weakened this action. We do not denounce anyone who differ with us in issues of ijtihād. As as been clarified, their is no fanaticism for anyone other than the Prophet ﷺ. However, the action of moving the finger has been narrated with an authentic chain and was the widespread practice of the people of al-Madīnah which al-Imām Mālik inherited. And Allāh knows best.
@@Alex21441 Al Abani undermined the entire ummah by saying that the Hadiths were weak because he came along in modern day times and claimed that the entire ummah has been practicing the religion the wrong way for 1400 years!! He had no right to make those claims!! He made claims that the companions of the Prophet were wrong in their practice of Islam!! He exceeded his limits!!!
@@alihanifa8090 Can you please provide evidence that Sheikh Al Bani claimed the whole Ummah had been practising the religion the wrong way? He spent many years locked away looking through thousands of hadith having access the more hadith than some of the scholars of the past. I am not saying he was perfect in his grading of hadith and this has been mentioned, but he was a scholar who did his best to aid the Ummah, and was very beneficial Wal Hamdulilah. My brother in Islam Sheikh Al Bani was on another level to us here on youtube commenting in terms of his devotion to the deen and what he contributed for the sake of Allah and may Allah have mercy on him and guide us both to what is pleasing to Him Subhanahu wa ta a'la
@@Alex21441 I can't necessarily produce that he explicitly said verbatim that the Sheikh Al Albani said " the Ummah has been incorrect". However the Mathhab that I follow (Hanifa) i was taught a certain interpretation of taqleed ( strict adherence) to my school of thought not " blind following", what im saying is that his grading of Hadith was deplorable and he uprooted the practices of the Ummah due to his classification of Hadith and producing a following, for example the 8 rakats taraweeh Salah bida, saying that the companions of the Prophet was wrong in performing this Salah and was wrong in practicing it, the Fajr Adan claim that it was a bida by saying as salatu khairum minan noum, the benefits of reciting the last 3 ayats of Al Hasr, praising Ibn tammiyah bida interpretation of sifat and adding false attributes similar to humans in his works even though Ibn tammiyah retracted all his claims and statements before his death. Etc So if these were to be followed and believed then he would uprooted all the firm practices of our Ummah since it's inception. Scholars also accuse him of abandoning taqleed to the 4 rightly guided mathhabs and instead uprooting them by trying to discredit them and undermine and question their authenticity. He also classified originally weak Hadith that were only accepted by the Shia boasting the Shia claim of imammah even though the ijma (consensus) of the entire Ummah was that they were weak and the list goes on. If he is right certain practices are considered wrong so how is that not fitnah!? I'm not a scholar but our scholars of the true Ulama-e-Haqq are warning us of the discord being sewn by this rouge salafi sect! And it has cause more problems than benefit the deen in these times! Now modern westernized Muslims are jumping on his bandwagon introducing bida in the religion and are disrespecting our Golden sihah sitta ( 6 sahih books)!!
اعلم عافاك الله و اياي ان ما تحت اديم السماء منذ الحافظ السيوطي الى هذا العصر رجل اكثر دفاعا عن سنة الحبيب صلى الله عليه و سلم من الشيخ العلامة المحديث المجدد الالباني ( و كذلك الشيخ القاضي المحدث احمد شاكر ) رحمهم الله
May allah bless you. Whatever sheikh al bani argues, he does it with knowledge and reasoning. So nobody can critise his methodology. Debate him with knowledge and reason. People of Hadith have always been criticised so has been sheikh. We need to follow him in as muhadish and he has established it. Even imam Bukhari rahimaulla was not spared at his time. So we all including mufti sahib should first see our level then talk about someone like sheikh.
There are numerous ahadith which indicate to raising the index finger in tashahud as an act of sunnah. Saaiduna Abdullah Ibn Umar Radiallahu Anhu said “When the Prophet of Allah Sallallahu Alahi Wasalam sat for tashahud, he placed his left hand on his left knee and placed his right hand on his right knee, and he formed a ring like, and pointed with his finger at ‘La Ilaha’ ”. (Sahih Muslim) Saaiduna Waail Ibn Hujr Radiallahu Anhu narrates that he saw the Prophet of Allah Sallallahu Alahi Wasalam when he sat in prayer spread out left foot and placed his hands on his thighs and pointed with his index finger making supplication in this way. (Sunan Nasai p.187v.1) Hazrat Moulana Muhammed Zakariya (RA) has given an overview of the four Schools of Thought with regards to whether the index finger should be raised and moved continuousy or not. Imam Abu Hanifah (RA), Imam Shafi (RA) and Imam Ahmed Hanbal (RA) are of the view that the finger should not be moved continuously in tashahud. The most common view in the Maliki Fiqh is of moving the finger, however Ibn Qasim and Ibn Arabi oppose this view. (Awjazul Masalik p.117 v.2) Imam Nawawi (RA) has said that the movement of the finger in Salah is Makruh. (Al Majmu p.454 v.3) Ibn Qudamah has also said that the index finger should not be moved in the tashahud. (Mughni p.99 v.2) The view of Imam Abu Hanifah (RA), Imam Shafi (RA) and Imam Ahmaed Hanbal (RA) is established through the hadith narrated by Saaiduna Abdullah Ibn Zubair Radiallahu Anhu that the Prophet of Allah Sallallahu Alahi Wasalam would point with his finger when he prayed and he would not move it. (Sunan Nasai p.187 v.1)
Subhan Allaah.... he did more Jarh wa ta'deel then answer the question..... just a bunch of verbal gymnastics..... Allaah says اتقوا الله وقولوا قولا سديدا...... that was painful to hear him (hafidhahullaah) do to them what he claims they do to him........ and he never answered the question bi adillah...... with all due respect.
You criticize Albani, Albani criticize past scholars, salafees bash Deobandi, Deobandi highlight mistakes of salafees. Ikhwan the Sahaba has the greatest test and they had to fight each other but yet they loved each other and prayed Janaza after the wars of Jamal and Safeen. GROW UP!
So you believe Al Abani and his claims that the companions of the Prophet practiced the religion the wrong way or that we as a ummah have been practicing the religion incorrectly for 1400 years until he came along to correct us!? What authority does he has!? He said taraweeh Salah is only 8 rakats instead of 20!!!! Which is the same practice from the Prophet and his companions since the inception of Islam!
@@rahatahmed6188 Tbh, no one from the salaf said 8. It was way later that it became 8. There was a time period where there was Ijma on 20 amongst the Muslims worldwide. Even Ibn Taymiyyah was for 20 as was ibn Qayyim. 8 did not start till way later
@@MuhammadHamza-ou6zq لم يقل أحد من العلماء بالشذوذ- كل ما في الأمر أن زائدة ابن قدامة و هو ثقة ثبت روى الحديث بزيادة التحريك و رواه جمع آخر ثقات من أمثال السفيين- و شعبة و غيرهم بغير زيادة التحريك فقدم أكثر العلماء هذا الأخير و الله تعالى أعلى و أعلم
We should be putting as much effort and discussion into improving the condition of the Muslims in the world as we do discussing whether to wiggle your finger or not.
The mufti should be asked honestly how many hadiths has he memorized or how many books of hadith and fiqh did he write himself. It's wrong to just blindly criticize a scholar who specializes in that field and wrote many books. I recommend you to listen some lectures of hadith and fiqh from sheikh salih alfwazan a great scholar of our time from madinah and you will learn alot. In shaa Allah
He was asked that, in fact he clarified many times his qualifications.And opposed to many people who just come up on tv or youtube or claim that they are teachers of religion just because they are followed by a bunch of youngsters, this man has formal education about islam and hadith in particular since he graduated from the college of hadith in madinah and you can get more detail if you check his videos when he says it. with that being said he actually did the complete opposite of what you're saying clearly you missed the point. he said we shouldn't be criticizing blindly and at the same time we shouldnt follow blindly and made his position clear for people like you not to say what you just said
Salaamu alaikum: questioner asks "What's wrong with the hadeeth in Shaikh Al Albanis book" ... Preface: It's generally understood by people of Sunnah that no scholar is infallible and all have made mistakes from the past and present and Imam Al Albani is no different. With that being said, it's quite unfortunate for us that no clarity came from this video other than some of Al Albanis students are fanatical in their love for him. That still doesn't leave us with a clear answer as to what's wrong with the position the shaikh took as the discussion suggests there's a problem with how he came to his conclusion regarding it. If that's not the case, then what's the real point of the video? Simply saying that scholars differed doesn't exactly prove that a mistake was made. It appears to me that some viewers who will watch this particular video will not find the answer they sought upon watching it. For example, Is there a stronger opinion that should be referred back too or a majority view? Or do we simply leave it at there's a difference of opinion amongst the scholars regarding the issue? If the latter is correct, it's just a difference of opinion why not just say that and continue to the next question? 18 secs max.
I don't think you actually listened and watched the whole video akhi. After the sheikh refuted the ghuloo of some people he clearly explained the views of the scholars and what they say about the hadith.
@@ia1399 He did it very quickly but didn't delve into why the hadith in shaikh al Albani is not authentic? I still left this video not knowing what the most authentic hadith is about the finger in tashahud.
@@theboxingbiker its very hard to delve into why the hadith is not authentic or what the most authentic hadith is. during the Q&A, there's a limited amount of time for the sessions. it would've been an hour long video if he would've started to explain in detail. there are other questions that are waiting to be asked from the people online and the brothers sitting on the floor during these sessions.
the most important in the end ..is the intention. But I agree so much with the idiotic blind followers who seem to worship sheiks instead of Allah. These people are lazy and dont want to think for themselves. Also they are afraid to lose that 'security' of blind following when doubt comes in place. But with doubt comes knowledge if you sincerely want to replace doubt with certainty.. and not just silence doubt to silence doubt,
For someone who never has finished any schools to be called the Sheikh is beyond the apprehension. Albani was only thought by his father and is that al-Albani does not seem to have been given any authorization (ijaza) in Hadith from any recognised scholar of Hadith
Please make a distinction when you criticize the ghulat Salafis, Spubs and co. As you are seem to generalise all Salafis in one basket as possessing their ghuloo
@@jamilakhtar8889 So you believe Al Abani and his claims that the companions of the Prophet practiced the religion the wrong way or that we as a ummah have been practicing the religion incorrectly for 1400 years until he came along to correct us!? What authority does he has!? He said taraweeh Salah is only 8 rakats instead of 20!!!! Which is the same practice from the Prophet and his companions since the inception of Islam!
All due respect. Is Shaykh Imam Muhaddeth Al Albani is he the Muhaddeth or is "Mufti" Muneer? Just there there is ikhtilaf and leave it at that. Explain the both sides, the fiqh etc. But don't put the Shaykhs Students down. Anyone who claims to be Salafi would never say that , but differ with beautiful manners
@@Anonymous-yh4ho So you believe Al Abani and his claims that the companions of the Prophet practiced the religion the wrong way or that we as a ummah have been practicing the religion incorrectly for 1400 years until he came along to correct us!? What authority does he has!? He said taraweeh Salah is only 8 rakats instead of 20!!!! Which is the same practice from the Prophet and his companions since the inception of Islam! Al Albani was no sheikh he was a deviate if you ask me, i was taught to believe in the Quran and Sahih Hadith not disbelieve it and then dedicate my entire life undermining it as if we as a Muslims Ummah had it all wrong even the companions of the Prophet for 1400 years until he came along!! He really started his own mathhab and created a movement of moderate Muslims that bent on destroying the foundation of Islam (sihah sitta)!!!
Brother, you need to stop all those dramas in your style, as usual. If you don’t know the answers to the questions posted to you, then admit it. There’s nothing wrong about not knowing something. So please, quit being do dramatic every time you attempt to address any issue.
@@Brrrr241 Not a problem bro but I don't want my brother to get divided by calling themselves by such names Allah had said that the best among you are those who call others people to Allah and call themselves as Muslims ♥️😁.
Albani did so many mistakes regarding the hadiths of the prophet and rejected them as if he's more knowledgeable than those who brought it to us . He's a joke not a scholar
Fear Allāh. Al-Albaani is a recognized scholars, especially in the science of Ḥadeeth. The scholars of Ḥadeeth all over the world bore witness to his immense scholarship; even his opponents that differed with him.
@@hashimnasser9967 The definition of what you mean by Sufi can vary. If by Sufi you mean someone who is not a Salafi and follows the Ahlul Bait and the Auliya then yes
Al Abani undermined the entire ummah by saying that the Hadiths were weak because he came along in modern day times and claimed that the entire ummah has been practicing the religion the wrong way for 1400 years!! He had no right to make those claims!! He made claims that the companions of the Prophet were wrong in their practice of Islam!! He exceeded his limits!!!
Thank you Mufti.. Albani is NOT from the Salaf. He made huge errors and he was from the Mujesima. When he was aproached by the Ulima he couldnt recite 10 Hadith from memory. Also he was expelled from Medinan how impurities are removed from Iron. Plus he left Ahlul Sunnah when he abandoned the Madhab. Who would follow a layman like Albani wrather than following the great imams of the Salaf ?
Mr Fake Beast since when are the maddhabs of Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i and Hanbali anything to do with the Sufi? They are schools of jurisprudence that came about after the works of the 4 imams who were among the Tabi’un and Tābi‘ al-Tābi‘in. I’m guessing you have not studied this as you sound ignorant on the issue.
I alternate between both methods. Sometimes I move the finger sometimes I keep it up straight. So we uphold the Sunnah and not lose it. At this point I feel both methods have their proofs so I uphold both.
May Allah guide us to the truth.
I do the same
❤
When do you move it? I’m trying to learn this method but don’t know when to move it up and down.
Switching ur method is not from the sunnah
Allah knows best what Albani knew and what is true. I used to get in these debates but most people are just looking for arguements and disagreements. Personally, I look to the real Salaf for my answers, according to what knowledge has been conveyed to us. In addition to that, I know that one who is not trained and learned directly from a legitimate alam can very easily misinterpret what is said in any book and therefore practice incorrectly. This can also open the door to misleading others as well. According to Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveler), which is a very thorough book related to Shafii fiqh and their teachings, Imam Bayhaqi and Imam Dawud discussed this matter and initially it was thought that there was a disagreement. That is until the movement of the finger mentioned in hadith was explained to be moving from a position of laying flat with the other fingers on top of the thigh to the position of pointing up. The moving of the finger did not mean wagging, wiggling, e.t.c. Since this info is much older and closer to the source, comes from orthodox Salafs and is more commonly accepted as the correct understanding and methodology, then this is what I follow. I question anyone who comes along hundreds of years later; be they a shaykh or kalif. In addition to all that, the scholars say kushu should be sought at all times during salat and this means refraining from excessive, unnecessary movements. Wa Allahu alam.
بارك الله فيك
I love his passion he really cares, and he is so honest and comprehensive in his explanations.
Absolutely Gorgeous Wallahi well said Mufti masha'allah well said ahki
omg!!! mashallah mashallah he is telling the same thing which i say and sometimes blamed for refusing to follow the ulema in some rulings where there are stronger evidences brought forward by ulema of different school of thought.
salaam from your brother for kolkata India.
Wallahi Mufti said the truth. There are so many so called salafis blindly following sheikh Al Albani and being the most stubborn.
Always study yourself and follow a fatwa and respect other fatwas
Sheikh Albania biew on moving the finger is what most scholars agree up on
@@quadriahnomuyiwa9262 LoL no. Though I follow Sheikh Al Albani's view on this but most scholars don't agree with this.
Also majority minority doesn't matter when it comes to Fiqh unless there is a clear cut Ijma.
@@Pain-jw3uu What are you talking about ?? !!
The fatwa of Sheikh Albani is to move the finger.
@@bf6724 yes this is sheikh Al albani's opinion which is also what i follow. But this is not the majority opinion.
@@Pain-jw3uu I researched the topic, and I noticed that there were many opinions. But on what basis do they say that Sheikh Albani is wrong !! ??
Jazaak Allaah khiayran
Allahuakbar
answer to title starts at 7:49
8:49
Awesome
I heard Shaykh Abu Ishaac AlHuwayni say we should move the finger and he's considered a a leading Authority in Egypt on Hadith
Shaykh Mustwafa Al- adawy one of the scholars of hadith in Egypt also holds the view that it is best not to move the finger
@@user-dp3bb5df5l that's the disease of knowing some people through other pipo instead of knowing them directly
May Allah forgive you
@@user-dp3bb5df5l Stop labelling people you don't know man. That'll only spread hatred.
@@user-dp3bb5df5l you are a salafi jt.fear Allah.
Moving the finger is the relied-upon position of the Mālikī madhhab based upon the actions of the people of al-Madīnah. Therefore, to say that this action has no basis in the Sunnah is incorrect. And we respect those scholars, in their ijtihād, which weakened this action. We do not denounce anyone who differ with us in issues of ijtihād. As as been clarified, their is no fanaticism for anyone other than the Prophet ﷺ. However, the action of moving the finger has been narrated with an authentic chain and was the widespread practice of the people of al-Madīnah which al-Imām Mālik inherited. And Allāh knows best.
Many of Shaykh Al Albanis students differed with him on grading of a Hadeeth or an ijtihadi view.
The key thing you did not mention is that they still loved him and held him high despite disagreements in these issues!
@@Alex21441 Al Abani undermined the entire ummah by saying that the Hadiths were weak because he came along in modern day times and claimed that the entire ummah has been practicing the religion the wrong way for 1400 years!! He had no right to make those claims!! He made claims that the companions of the Prophet were wrong in their practice of Islam!! He exceeded his limits!!!
@@alihanifa8090 Can you please provide evidence that Sheikh Al Bani claimed the whole Ummah had been practising the religion the wrong way? He spent many years locked away looking through thousands of hadith having access the more hadith than some of the scholars of the past. I am not saying he was perfect in his grading of hadith and this has been mentioned, but he was a scholar who did his best to aid the Ummah, and was very beneficial Wal Hamdulilah. My brother in Islam Sheikh Al Bani was on another level to us here on youtube commenting in terms of his devotion to the deen and what he contributed for the sake of Allah and may Allah have mercy on him and guide us both to what is pleasing to Him Subhanahu wa ta a'la
@@Alex21441 I can't necessarily produce that he explicitly said verbatim that the Sheikh Al Albani said " the Ummah has been incorrect". However the Mathhab that I follow (Hanifa) i was taught a certain interpretation of taqleed ( strict adherence) to my school of thought not " blind following", what im saying is that his grading of Hadith was deplorable and he uprooted the practices of the Ummah due to his classification of Hadith and producing a following, for example the 8 rakats taraweeh Salah bida, saying that the companions of the Prophet was wrong in performing this Salah and was wrong in practicing it, the Fajr Adan claim that it was a bida by saying as salatu khairum minan noum, the benefits of reciting the last 3 ayats of Al Hasr, praising Ibn tammiyah bida interpretation of sifat and adding false attributes similar to humans in his works even though Ibn tammiyah retracted all his claims and statements before his death. Etc So if these were to be followed and believed then he would uprooted all the firm practices of our Ummah since it's inception. Scholars also accuse him of abandoning taqleed to the 4 rightly guided mathhabs and instead uprooting them by trying to discredit them and undermine and question their authenticity. He also classified originally weak Hadith that were only accepted by the Shia boasting the Shia claim of imammah even though the ijma (consensus) of the entire Ummah was that they were weak and the list goes on. If he is right certain practices are considered wrong so how is that not fitnah!? I'm not a scholar but our scholars of the true Ulama-e-Haqq are warning us of the discord being sewn by this rouge salafi sect! And it has cause more problems than benefit the deen in these times! Now modern westernized Muslims are jumping on his bandwagon introducing bida in the religion and are disrespecting our Golden sihah sitta ( 6 sahih books)!!
And can you offer proof that he accessed more Hadith than the Sahaaba and their students and their students students? He didn't do that
Seems like he was being too personal with Al Albani rather than answering the question.
But Allah knows best based on his Agenda with Albani
نعوذ بالله من الرياء ما هذا الله المستعان
agreed .
why subtitle doesn't available? :(((
Knowledge based criticism from Sufis would be accepted but we definitely cannot follow something that's not been advised through Quran and Sunnah.
اعلم عافاك الله و اياي ان ما تحت اديم السماء منذ الحافظ السيوطي الى هذا العصر رجل اكثر دفاعا عن سنة الحبيب صلى الله عليه و سلم من الشيخ العلامة المحديث المجدد الالباني ( و كذلك الشيخ القاضي المحدث احمد شاكر ) رحمهم الله
At 10.57
“Do not monopolize the fiqh of salaf”
Love it.
Wow! This speaker is charged with the energy of Islam. Who is he?
May allah bless you. Whatever sheikh al bani argues, he does it with knowledge and reasoning. So nobody can critise his methodology. Debate him with knowledge and reason. People of Hadith have always been criticised so has been sheikh. We need to follow him in as muhadish and he has established it. Even imam Bukhari rahimaulla was not spared at his time. So we all including mufti sahib should first see our level then talk about someone like sheikh.
Dr. Riyaz Ahmad Mus-Ab We can criticize his methodology. He also criticized great muhaddiths.
Stop Blindly Following and study yourself.
I will not believe someone who is from the time of lying and reject someone who's in the time of Truthfulness
Why have you put that as your name
There are numerous ahadith which indicate to raising the index finger in tashahud as an act of sunnah.
Saaiduna Abdullah Ibn Umar Radiallahu Anhu said “When the Prophet of Allah Sallallahu Alahi Wasalam sat for tashahud, he placed his left hand on his left knee and placed his right hand on his right knee, and he formed a ring like, and pointed with his finger at ‘La Ilaha’ ”. (Sahih Muslim)
Saaiduna Waail Ibn Hujr Radiallahu Anhu narrates that he saw the Prophet of Allah Sallallahu Alahi Wasalam when he sat in prayer spread out left foot and placed his hands on his thighs and pointed with his index finger making supplication in this way. (Sunan Nasai p.187v.1)
Hazrat Moulana Muhammed Zakariya (RA) has given an overview of the four Schools of Thought with regards to whether the index finger should be raised and moved continuousy or not. Imam Abu Hanifah (RA), Imam Shafi (RA) and Imam Ahmed Hanbal (RA) are of the view that the finger should not be moved continuously in tashahud.
The most common view in the Maliki Fiqh is of moving the finger, however Ibn Qasim and Ibn Arabi oppose this view. (Awjazul Masalik p.117 v.2)
Imam Nawawi (RA) has said that the movement of the finger in Salah is Makruh. (Al Majmu p.454 v.3)
Ibn Qudamah has also said that the index finger should not be moved in the tashahud. (Mughni p.99 v.2)
The view of Imam Abu Hanifah (RA), Imam Shafi (RA) and Imam Ahmaed Hanbal (RA) is established through the hadith narrated by Saaiduna Abdullah Ibn Zubair Radiallahu Anhu that the Prophet of Allah Sallallahu Alahi Wasalam would point with his finger when he prayed and he would not move it. (Sunan Nasai p.187 v.1)
1:00 i agree with shaykh there people who ascribe to the sallaf but they take in the same manner as taqleedis do
What’s taqleedis
@@smashb3766 blind followers
Rocket science
Subhan Allaah.... he did more Jarh wa ta'deel then answer the question..... just a bunch of verbal gymnastics..... Allaah says اتقوا الله وقولوا قولا سديدا...... that was painful to hear him (hafidhahullaah) do to them what he claims they do to him........ and he never answered the question bi adillah...... with all due respect.
You criticize Albani, Albani criticize past scholars, salafees bash Deobandi, Deobandi highlight mistakes of salafees.
Ikhwan the Sahaba has the greatest test and they had to fight each other but yet they loved each other and prayed Janaza after the wars of Jamal and Safeen.
GROW UP!
So you believe Al Abani and his claims that the companions of the Prophet practiced the religion the wrong way or that we as a ummah have been practicing the religion incorrectly for 1400 years until he came along to correct us!? What authority does he has!? He said taraweeh Salah is only 8 rakats instead of 20!!!! Which is the same practice from the Prophet and his companions since the inception of Islam!
pointdot09
Because the sahabah had the same Aqeedah.
@@rahatahmed6188 Tbh, no one from the salaf said 8. It was way later that it became 8. There was a time period where there was Ijma on 20 amongst the Muslims worldwide. Even Ibn Taymiyyah was for 20 as was ibn Qayyim. 8 did not start till way later
@@aaaaaaaaa790 Some said 36 rakats. It's really not a big issue?
My finger moves even without me trying to move it. I am sure when i get older my finger will move more because of old age...just a thought
من قال بشذوذ- رواية التحريك أعطينا واحد من أهل العلم قال بهذا
الشيخ عبد الله بن عبدالرحمن السعد
facebook.com/326600247699800/posts/866566067036546/
@@MuhammadHamza-ou6zq اسم الكتاب من فضلك
أظن أنه لم يقله في كتاب و إنما هو مستفاد من دروسه الصوتية
استمع لهذا المقطع
ruclips.net/video/iwatE9Qaf4U/видео.html
@@MuhammadHamza-ou6zq لم يقل أحد من العلماء بالشذوذ- كل ما في الأمر أن زائدة ابن قدامة و هو ثقة ثبت روى الحديث بزيادة التحريك و رواه جمع آخر ثقات من أمثال السفيين- و شعبة و غيرهم بغير زيادة التحريك فقدم أكثر العلماء هذا الأخير و الله تعالى أعلى و أعلم
He s not known of critics . He's known of jahl and dawah ljahilya
There is sickness in your heart. May Allah save you.
@@n.a3642 I'm not brother ' I'm saying that because the Man rejected hadiths of the prophet muhammad out of opinion.
We should be putting as much effort and discussion into improving the condition of the Muslims in the world as we do discussing whether to wiggle your finger or not.
You said it best.
I’ll wiggle you
Nothing wrong with discussing it as there are many fawaaid that can be mentioned in this issue
I follow the Albanian madhab. Thus, I move the finger.
This makes absolutely no sense. You follow someone who came 1400 yrs after the prophet instead of the salaf who the prophet praised, smh
@@aaaaaaaaa790 he follows imam Albani's interpretation of the qur'an and Sunnah and Allah knows best.
@@whn2058 may Allah reward you! Ameen!!!
Now you have been asked a specific question. Just answer it. Why you are beating around the bush. Just answer.
This is unjust
The mufti should be asked honestly how many hadiths has he memorized or how many books of hadith and fiqh did he write himself. It's wrong to just blindly criticize a scholar who specializes in that field and wrote many books. I recommend you to listen some lectures of hadith and fiqh from sheikh salih alfwazan a great scholar of our time from madinah and you will learn alot. In shaa Allah
He was asked that, in fact he clarified many times his qualifications.And opposed to many people who just come up on tv or youtube or claim that they are teachers of religion just because they are followed by a bunch of youngsters, this man has formal education about islam and hadith in particular since he graduated from the college of hadith in madinah and you can get more detail if you check his videos when he says it. with that being said he actually did the complete opposite of what you're saying clearly you missed the point. he said we shouldn't be criticizing blindly and at the same time we shouldnt follow blindly and made his position clear for people like you not to say what you just said
Salaamu alaikum: questioner asks "What's wrong with the hadeeth in Shaikh Al Albanis book" ... Preface: It's generally understood by people of Sunnah that no scholar is infallible and all have made mistakes from the past and present and Imam Al Albani is no different. With that being said, it's quite unfortunate for us that no clarity came from this video other than some of Al Albanis students are fanatical in their love for him. That still doesn't leave us with a clear answer as to what's wrong with the position the shaikh took as the discussion suggests there's a problem with how he came to his conclusion regarding it. If that's not the case, then what's the real point of the video? Simply saying that scholars differed doesn't exactly prove that a mistake was made. It appears to me that some viewers who will watch this particular video will not find the answer they sought upon watching it. For example, Is there a stronger opinion that should be referred back too or a majority view? Or do we simply leave it at there's a difference of opinion amongst the scholars regarding the issue? If the latter is correct, it's just a difference of opinion why not just say that and continue to the next question? 18 secs max.
I don't think you actually listened and watched the whole video akhi.
After the sheikh refuted the ghuloo of some people he clearly explained the views of the scholars and what they say about the hadith.
@@ia1399 He did it very quickly but didn't delve into why the hadith in shaikh al Albani is not authentic? I still left this video not knowing what the most authentic hadith is about the finger in tashahud.
the answer was clear. and it's clear that your understanding and attention span is lacking.
@@theboxingbiker its very hard to delve into why the hadith is not authentic or what the most authentic hadith is. during the Q&A, there's a limited amount of time for the sessions. it would've been an hour long video if he would've started to explain in detail. there are other questions that are waiting to be asked from the people online and the brothers sitting on the floor during these sessions.
@@dbzkhalid01 Akhi there is no need to insult people. I'm sure he got the point anyways.
the most important in the end ..is the intention.
But I agree so much with the idiotic blind followers who seem to worship sheiks instead of Allah. These people are lazy and dont want to think for themselves. Also they are afraid to lose that 'security' of blind following when doubt comes in place. But with doubt comes knowledge if you sincerely want to replace doubt with certainty.. and not just silence doubt to silence doubt,
Stones Jones This is one of the most Beautiful statements I have seen Brother.
@@Pain-jw3uu thank you my brother!
For someone who never has finished any schools to be called the Sheikh is beyond the apprehension. Albani was only thought by his father and is that al-Albani does not seem to have been given any authorization (ijaza) in Hadith from any recognised scholar of Hadith
اين انت يا صعلوك من الملوك.......
Please make a distinction when you criticize the ghulat Salafis, Spubs and co. As you are seem to generalise all Salafis in one basket as possessing their ghuloo
@@jamilakhtar8889 So you believe Al Abani and his claims that the companions of the Prophet practiced the religion the wrong way or that we as a ummah have been practicing the religion incorrectly for 1400 years until he came along to correct us!? What authority does he has!? He said taraweeh Salah is only 8 rakats instead of 20!!!! Which is the same practice from the Prophet and his companions since the inception of Islam!
@@alihanifa8090 can you provide your evidence for 20 rakat of taraweeh since the prophet SAW and his companions RA?
All due respect. Is Shaykh Imam Muhaddeth Al Albani is he the Muhaddeth or is "Mufti" Muneer? Just there there is ikhtilaf and leave it at that. Explain the both sides, the fiqh etc. But don't put the Shaykhs Students down. Anyone who claims to be Salafi would never say that , but differ with beautiful manners
@Jameel Subhan don't be sensitive, he only mentioned a description.
Listen again plz
Akhi, the early scholars reserved the term muhaddith for those who have memorized 100,000 hadith which Sheikh Albani did not
Someone miss the point lol 😂
@@Anonymous-yh4ho So you believe Al Abani and his claims that the companions of the Prophet practiced the religion the wrong way or that we as a ummah have been practicing the religion incorrectly for 1400 years until he came along to correct us!? What authority does he has!? He said taraweeh Salah is only 8 rakats instead of 20!!!! Which is the same practice from the Prophet and his companions since the inception of Islam! Al Albani was no sheikh he was a deviate if you ask me, i was taught to believe in the Quran and Sahih Hadith not disbelieve it and then dedicate my entire life undermining it as if we as a Muslims Ummah had it all wrong even the companions of the Prophet for 1400 years until he came along!! He really started his own mathhab and created a movement of moderate Muslims that bent on destroying the foundation of Islam (sihah sitta)!!!
Brother, you need to stop all those dramas in your style, as usual. If you don’t know the answers to the questions posted to you, then admit it. There’s nothing wrong about not knowing something. So please, quit being do dramatic every time you attempt to address any issue.
Sheikh are u sunni?
Of course alhamdulilah hes following the sunnah / sunni
A K yes
why does you want to divide yourself by saying such things.
@@Yoyo-dx8wz omg 2 years ago uno, and brother are u Sunni or something else ? Just curious
@@Brrrr241 Not a problem bro but I don't want my brother to get divided by calling themselves by such names Allah had said that the best among you are those who call others people to Allah and call themselves as Muslims ♥️😁.
Albani did so many mistakes regarding the hadiths of the prophet and rejected them as if he's more knowledgeable than those who brought it to us . He's a joke not a scholar
Fear Allāh. Al-Albaani is a recognized scholars, especially in the science of Ḥadeeth. The scholars of Ḥadeeth all over the world bore witness to his immense scholarship; even his opponents that differed with him.
Was it the middle finger :)
No because that would always be pointing at you lol
You don't know Al-Baany brother ,and you dont know hadith...
Shut up please
U will feel the wrath!!! ⚔️🗡🔪🐝🐝🐝
?
@@AllahKnowsme07 it's a quote from the vedio
@@yahyaabbie9795 jazakAllah khayr
Kemarahan
Syaikh Albani is somewhat deviant in some fiqh due to him being an auto didact learner
@---- Most of the top scholars don't have many errors though, Albani on the other hand has been rejected by 12 big scholars of his time
Sufi onboard
@@hashimnasser9967 I am a nationalist bro
@@mikailshakes4514 be direct, why you hiding.
@@hashimnasser9967 The definition of what you mean by Sufi can vary. If by Sufi you mean someone who is not a Salafi and follows the Ahlul Bait and the Auliya then yes
Al Abani undermined the entire ummah by saying that the Hadiths were weak because he came along in modern day times and claimed that the entire ummah has been practicing the religion the wrong way for 1400 years!! He had no right to make those claims!! He made claims that the companions of the Prophet were wrong in their practice of Islam!! He exceeded his limits!!!
Go to sleep
Thank you Mufti.. Albani is NOT from the Salaf. He made huge errors and he was from the Mujesima. When he was aproached by the Ulima he couldnt recite 10 Hadith from memory. Also he was expelled from Medinan how impurities are removed from Iron.
Plus he left Ahlul Sunnah when he abandoned the Madhab. Who would follow a layman like Albani wrather than following the great imams of the Salaf ?
U r an ignorant may Allah guide u
Madhab? 😂😂 you must be a Sufi
@Jordan Lveira Word. Sheikh Bomshot for Grand Mufti!
@@TomSuckAtFinance kkkkkk he must be sufi coz he oppose ur ideology
Mr Fake Beast since when are the maddhabs of Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i and Hanbali anything to do with the Sufi? They are schools of jurisprudence that came about after the works of the 4 imams who were among the Tabi’un and Tābi‘ al-Tābi‘in. I’m guessing you have not studied this as you sound ignorant on the issue.
بارك الله فيك