Yes, atty. Carbon is engaged in the practice of law. According to the case of Cayetano vs Monsod, the practice of law is not restricted to litigation and trial in court only. Practice of law is anything that requires the application of legal knowledge and training. In this case, Atty. Carbon has been teaching negotiable law instruments in a university that requires legal knowldege and training. Therefore, Atty. Carbon is engaged in the practice of law.
According to the case of Cayetano vs Monsod -> Reword to "According to jurisprudence," delikado kasi mag-cite ng case name mismo unless sure ka na on all fours ang case pag nasa bar exam kana. "the practice of law is not restricted to litigation and trial in court only." -> you can actually take this out already. sayang ang precious seconds just to write that down. "Atty. Carbon has been teaching negotiable law instruments in a university that requires legal knowldege and training" -> move mo yung key word na "requires legal knowldege and training" sa tabi ng NIL. Thank you for the answer =) Hope this helps.
Bacon Palacio Thank you, attorney for correcting my answer. I am a fresh man Business major. I love reading and writing, pero di po ako masyado inclined sa public debate during high school. Pero po I love reading and writing. I can read for 8 hours straight. Do you think po ba i'm at disadvantage? Paano mo mahasa ang debating skills ?
You are a gem, sir. I'm a current designer and have been thinking on shifting career as a lawyer. Your videos help me prepare in my decisions. Subscribed!
I apologize this re-upload does not have closed captions yet. I will update to include closed captions by August 19, 2019 at 12 noon Philippine Standard Time.
Yes, Atty. Carbon engaged in practice of law. In the case of Cayatano Vs. Monsood the court defined that practice of law is not limited to litigations and appearing in court trial but also in any private practice as long it involves legal knowledge and intervention. In the case present, Atty. Carbon is teaching law subject to law school that requires application of legal knowledge and intervention. Therefore, Atty. Carbon is still engaged in the practice of law.
Yes, Atty. Carbon is engage in the practice of law. Case law provides that, a person is engage in the practice of law when he perform acts that requires the application of legal knowledge and training. Here, Atty. Carbon is engage in the practice of law because he is teaches negotiable instrument law, an act which requires the application of legal knowledge and training. Thus, Atty Carbon is engage in the practice of law.
Where have you been all this time? Thanks for your videos. I'm now reconsidering the Bar. I just don't know exactly when, since I've been out of momentum for many years now.
I delayed my second take for three years. I know of someone who passed after YEARS of not taking the bar. It's not about momentum, it is about learning new things that are covered by the bar, and unlearning old doctrines and law. Good luck! Glad I could help.
Thank you for this. It helps. May mga profs ako na swak ako sa taste but most hnd. I will try these method of answering. Mostly kasi ang sagot ko is No. The supreme court ruled that.. Yown hnd pala maganda point nun haha. Oh well salamat po atty I will practice this style during my law school now. I am a first year btw
Hi Atty. Palacio, Im ur subscriber :) Here is my answer to sub-question B: "Yes, Atty. Carbon is qualified to become a Regional Trial Court Judge. According to Sec 15 of Batas Pambansa Blg 129: A person must be natural born citizen; atleast 35 years of age; atleast 10 years engaged in practice of law in the philippines. In the case at bar, Atty Carbon is 36 years of age; he is engaged in practice of law for 12 years. However, being in trial or litigation work is not a requirement; it must be emphasize that having practice for law for more than 10 years is the most indispensable requirement to be qualified since practice of law requires legal training, knowledge and experience. For these reasons, Atty. Carbon is qualified to be a Regional Trial Court Judge." I'm hoping you will critique this Atty. Bacon! 1st year law student here 🖐️ Thank you po sa mga videos nyo, real help po 💪
Y, who is a businessman, and Atty. X are good friends. Due to their closeness, Atty. X was able to borrow ₱300,000.00 from Y, which amount was intended to refurbish Atty. X's law office.Months after, Y got into a contractual dispute with Z, one of his business partners. Hence, Y sought the legal services of Atty. X for the filing of the proper action against Z. In consideration for his legal services, Y paid Atty. X an acceptance fee of ₱50,000.00.Unfortunately, Atty. X and Y's relationship turned sour. Thus, all communications between them were cut, and worse, Atty. X failed to file the required initiatory pleading against Z on the date agreed upon. Aggrieved, Y filed an administrative complaint, seeking that Atty. X be sanctioned and that the ₱50,000.00 acceptance fee and the ₱300,000.00 personal loan be returned to him. (a) What administrative violation/s did Atty. X commit, if any? Explain. (5%) (b) May Y's prayer for the return of the ₱50,000.00 acceptance fee and the ₱300,000.00 personal loan prosper?
Yup. UP suggested answer is one. You can answer that way if you want, but you run the risk of presenting a confusing answer. The 4 paragraph method is used to make sure you present an answer that is logical and easy to understand.
@@baconpalacio oo naman kaso di ko alam kung kaya ko... I mean mahirap naman school namin due to advance curriculum na kaya ko naman pero di ko alam kung kaya ko ng law school o hindi... Imprumtu at extemporaneous wala talaga ako jan tsaka debate konti lang experience ko grade 10 pa po ako nag dedecide lng naman kung ano ba talagang worth it kunin. Dati may passion na gustong gusto ko talga ako sa law tas nawala na dahil nga kaklaseng toh makaka discourage pero ngayon nasa isip ko na kung e persue ko ba o hindi... At tsaka turuan ba tayo sa popesor the art of being bias?
@@alphaofficial9778 mahirap sagutin kasi tanong mo unless ikaw mismo ang mag decide. Ganito, decide now to take law. As in focus everything dun. If it does not work out, may plan B naman. In my case, wala akong plan B.
Hi po. Sorry medyo nabitin ako sa sub question b. So pwede po ba sagutin yon ng additional information needed to determine if atty carbon is qualified to be an rtc judge?
Good afternoon po Sir. May isang tanong lang po sana kame. Sana po makita nyo po ito. When citing from decided cases po when answering exam questions do we need to answer in verbatim as to how the court specifically wrote it in the decided cases po; or do we just need to get the main idea/concept of that decision po and re-state it po without it having to exactly look like as to how it was stated in the court decision po? Example: ANSWERING USING THE ORIGINAL STATEMENT IN THE DECIDED CASE: (VERBATIM) According to Tanada v. Angara, G.R. No. 118295, the sovereignty of a state therefore cannot in fact and in reality be considered absolute. Certain restrictions enter into the picture: (1) limitations imposed by the very nature of membership in the family of nations and (2) limitations imposed by treaty stipulations. ANSWERING BY JUST RE-STATING THE IDEA OF THE DECIDED CASE (NON-VERBATIM) According to Tanada v. Angara, G.R. No. 118295, the Philippines is subject to restriction by its membership in the family of nations, and the limitations imposed of treaty limitations. Sana po masagot nyo po ito. It would really help me and my classmates po on how to better study since we would know kung kailangan ba talaga word per word na i memorize yung case decisions, or kung okay lang na yung primary ideas/concepts po ang ma intindihan namin ng maigi since we could just paraphrase or re-state the decision when answering questions po without it having to exactly look like how it was written in the SC decision po. Salamat po Sir.
Law is too broad to master, in my own opinion. Imagine, you study 8 bar subjects that are further divided into atleast 3 more subjects in law school (i.e. Criminal Law 1, Criminal Law 2, and Special Penal Laws are major components of Criminal Law).
Balak ko po sanang mag-enrol ngayong taon ng law. Ano po ba ang pwede ko nang basahin at kabisaduhin na makatutulong po sakin?Ano po yung mga basics na dapat aralin?
Sir @@baconpalacio last question Ano po best advice nyo sa mga engineer na gusto magaral sa law school, ganun pa din po ba same lng po ba ng sagot un sa una kong tanong? Tnx po.
Yung required mo ng mga teachers mo. Kasi dun ka susunod sa kanila eh. HOWEVER, wag ka muna bumili agad. MAnghiram ka muna sa library ninyo for 2 weeks then decide whether bibili ka o hindi.
Atty. Bacon, para po sa mga law school exams, how do we answer a question na maraming legal basis pwede I-cite? How do we know which ones to use? Thank you!
Thank you for comnenting. You need to spot the issue po. Usually, isang article lang kelangan mo to answer a problem. Minsan kelangan mo talaga ng multiple articles to answer a question. Ex: para maresolve ang vicarious liabilty kelangan mo sagutin kung may quasi delict ba muna.
Alam mo iniisip ko nga ito ng nag take ako ng bar. ATM, I'm thinking kung yung tanong ay pwede sagutin ng 4 paragraph rule, siguro tangalin mo lang yung first paragraph kung 2.5 points lang. Para tipid oras.
sir, bakit hindi advisable na mag cite ng case sa pag sagot? ex. in the case of cayetano vs. monsod, hindi ko kasi maintindihan meron nagsasabi mag cite meron sabi wag daw. ano ang reason bakit hindi dapat mag cite? and ok lang ba mag cite ng provisions? o kelangan laging general statement like "civil law provides"
Because it is risky to cite specific provisions or case titles. If mag cite ka mismo ng provision or case title dapat verbatim mo i cote yun. Also, my concept ng stare decisis. So dapat swak na swak yung case na i-cite mo dun sa problem. Factor in mo pa na our memory fails in times of great stress. Thus, it is risky to cite exact provisions of law and cases.
@@baconpalacio ah ok broad ang civil law or code, so what do i have to cite? for example sir question about property? what do i have to cite? if ever hindi ko matandaan ang exact art. sa civil code sa property, salamat!
@@baconpalacio ok sir, malinaw na sakin, salamat sir sa tips, hopefully ma impress ang prof ko hindi ko kasi mahuli kiliti nila, para bang nagluluto ako ng sinigang na lahat sila iba iba ang gusto ng timpla sa sinigang. hindi ako makagawa ng generic na lasa na lahat sila magugustuhan.
Hi sir. Apologies for going beyond the content of this video. Ask lang po sana ako how the actual Bar Review is being conducted?:) Araw-araw ba ang klase or what?
Yan po topic ng lastest videos ko po. Yung part two simulan ko nang i-edit after ko sagutin lahat ng mga tanong dito at magawa ko subtitles ng latest video ko.
Atty. ask ko lng po, ilang taon po ang pag aaral pra maging lawyer bago mag take ng bar at ano pong korso? 2nd po pag 40 npo ba wla npo bang pag asa? salamat po in advance God bless po..
A.. ok po salamat po.. balak kpo sana kso dnpo cguro maccredit mga units ko sa college dko po kc ntapos.. if ever po ba na kumuha ako ng pol sci. na 4years tpos deretso law, pwede pa po ba un 4years pa sa pag aaral ng law tama po noh? sobrang salamat po atty. sna po dpo kyo mag sawa sa pagtatanong ko.. kc ung mga katulad nyo po ang hinahangaan ko.. God bless po
Board exam is under the regulation of PRC while the bar exam is under the regulation of the supreme court. In fact, even though you passed the bar exam pero may di ka na meet na requirements di ka padin pede mag practice ng law.
Good afternoon, Atty. Paano po pag nakapag cite ng provision pero tama naman, negative po ba iyon? Tsaka po, okay lang po ba na 1 page per answer sa dalawa o tatlong questions per set of facts? And finally, tsaka may minus points po ba erasures at kunyare binura 1st premise kasi nag changed of mind ka. May ganyan kasi ako Atty. Thank you.
Kung nag cite ka, basta on all fours yung kaso then ok lang. Pero iniiwasan talaga iyon kasi rare na on all fours eh. Ok lang basta pinapayagan ng exam rules yung multiple answers per page. Basta sinunod mo yung rules on erasures ok lang iyon. May erasures din ako nung pumasa ako ng bar.
@@baconpalacio kasi sa mga k drama din halos e mention nila ang laws. Sa bar exam po situational po ba yun at mag mention ba dapat ng mga articles? At republic acts?
@@alphaofficial9778 frequently asked questions. Pasol ka muna ng law po para magets mo mga sasabihin ko. Promise, makakalimutan mo yan bago ka pa matapos ng college
Para lang pong 4 paragraph rule. Gagamitin mo ang IRAC para sagutin mga essay exams. It will help you organize yourself by focusing on the important bits of the problem. YES. Kelangan maging abugado ka muna before ka magiging fiscal.
If you like my content please consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/baconpalacio Playlist - Philippine Bar Exams and Law School: ruclips.net/p/PLjsTsqbrwGR7YSWrIZBI7vrT8H0KVQuvM timestamp: What this video is about: 00:00 Practical tips for the Bar Exams and Law School: 00:18 Four paragraph method and essay questions in the bar exams and law school: 02:08 How to apply the four paragraph method in the bar exam and law school: 04:02 Look for the facts: 05:08 Read the next call of the essay question: 05:22 Plain English: 05:38 Answering five point essay questions: 06:13 Answering open ended essay questions: 06:39 Issue spotting in essay questions: 06:53 Answer to essay sub-question "b": 07:24 Please support the channel by clicking the link before you checkout from Shopee: 1) Veco Journal Notebook 6x8.5inches - shp.ee/j7dnrzc 2) Veco Journal Notebook 7x10inches - shp.ee/w9ziy4a 3) Platinum Preppy (Fine) - shp.ee/mxdgmdi 4) Pilot Fountain Pen Ink (30ml) - shp.ee/uif2euu This video is NOT sponsored. Some product links are affiliate links which means if you buy anything I'll receive a small commission.
I just wanted to ask when you're in the moment of answering the bar did you realy got nervous?Is it hard to answer? Do you think a normal person can did that?Gosh there are so many doubt in me.Im really nervous
hi Atty. i am a freshman law student, magmimidterm exam na po kami this September but still i have a hard time on how to answer exam questions na to the point na naiiyak na ako.
Im trying the essay atty. But i can't express what i wanted to answer po..... It is my 5th time watching this particular video and I must admit I am learning bit by bit and will help on my upcoming midterm exam.I am taking down the 4 paragraph rule on answering essay.
I'm glad that you are learning something from the video. Maybe it is because you are not used to it yet. In my case, it took me the better part of my first year to get used to it. Keep at it. If you are up for it, try posting your answer here. Use the legal ethics question from 2017 and 2018 Philippine bar exams.
1. If the answer is "No, X may not use...", will that be a violation of the rule on double negatives? 2. Some are saying that you should not answer "it depends". If the answer calls for a qualification, how will you answer the question without using the words "it depends". 3. Do you answer questions with "partly correct"?
1) wag mo na ilagay yung NO. 2) RARE po kasi na "It depends" ang sagot sa bar eh. Kaya pumili ka nalang po ng side. 3) Rare din na merong partly correct sa bar. So as a rule, pumili ka ng side.
a) Yes, Atty Carbon is engaged in the practice of law According to Jurisprudence, the “practice of law” is not only limited to litigation and trial work. With that being said, him teaching Negotiable Instruments Law in a law school is considered practice of law ince this requires knowledge, training, and application of the law Therefore, Atty. Carbon is engaged in the practice of law. b) Yes, Atty Carbon is qualified to be a Regional Trial Court judge, if appointed. According to B.P. 129, Qualifications of an RTC Judge shall be 35 years of age and shall be engaged in the practice of law for at least 10 years Since Atty Carbon is 36 years old and has 12 years in the practice of law, he is qualified to be appointed as Regional Trial Court judge.
![[LAW SCHOOL PHILIPPINES] How to Answer Law School Exams like a Barista](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_Tn2koTjork/mqdefault.jpg)
Yes, atty. Carbon is engaged in the practice of law. According to the case of Cayetano vs Monsod, the practice of law is not restricted to litigation and trial in court only. Practice of law is anything that requires the application of legal knowledge and training. In this case, Atty. Carbon has been teaching negotiable law instruments in a university that requires legal knowldege and training. Therefore, Atty. Carbon is engaged in the practice of law.
According to the case of Cayetano vs Monsod -> Reword to "According to jurisprudence," delikado kasi mag-cite ng case name mismo unless sure ka na on all fours ang case pag nasa bar exam kana.
"the practice of law is not restricted to litigation and trial in court only." -> you can actually take this out already. sayang ang precious seconds just to write that down.
"Atty. Carbon has been teaching negotiable law instruments in a university that requires legal knowldege and training" -> move mo yung key word na "requires legal knowldege and training" sa tabi ng NIL.
Thank you for the answer =)
Hope this helps.
Bacon Palacio Thank you, attorney for correcting my answer. I am a fresh man Business major. I love reading and writing, pero di po ako masyado inclined sa public debate during high school. Pero po I love reading and writing. I can read for 8 hours straight. Do you think po ba i'm at disadvantage? Paano mo mahasa ang debating skills ?
Salika po sa debate club ng school mo ngayon. Best way po yun
Thank God I've found this. It really helps me, 13 years from now.
Balak mo mag law?
Opo Atty. Salamat sa mga informations😊
@@leynajuris5635 good luck. Explore lots of things in life. It will help you with your legal practice.
Yes, I do Atty.😊
Good luck!
Good job, Pañero! Hoping to collab with you sa future!
SURE! hit me up on my FB page or my Twitter =)
Wow, both of my admired lawyers are here!
Wow pareho Kong idol kau
Thanks for the motivation atty. Now i am starting my career as a juris doctor freshman. I hope i can survive law school.
You are a gem, sir. I'm a current designer and have been thinking on shifting career as a lawyer. Your videos help me prepare in my decisions. Subscribed!
Glad I could help po!
Thank you for the sub!
Salamat atty . Sa pg upload mo ng mga ganito labis po ako natuwa hendi po ako law student . Sakin lng po pra mdagdagan ang aking kaalaman
I'm not studying law but I need examples for good writing and this is still applicable. Thank you. 😄
Thank you for the kind words =)
Keep safe!
I have placed the closed captions! Enjoy the video. =)
Thank you for this video atty, it helps a lot especially for freshman student like me, hope we can view more videos on your channel...
thank you atty. super big help.
New subscriber. Thank you!
Thank you so much. It really helps me💖
Mga ganitong comments makes making videos really worth it!
Thank you atty.
Hi Atty. Thank you
I apologize this re-upload does not have closed captions yet.
I will update to include closed captions by August 19, 2019 at 12 noon Philippine Standard Time.
Hi po. Di po advisable because you might miss some details of the case title. Unless if you are so sure, you may do so.
Sorry, you lost me. Which part of the video are you referring to?
Good tips
Thank you for watching po!
thanks for this attorney.
My pleasure!
I want to be like you po someday.😊. Thank you po for this.
Yes, Atty. Carbon engaged in practice of law.
In the case of Cayatano Vs. Monsood the court defined that practice of law is not limited to litigations and appearing in court trial but also in any private practice as long it involves legal knowledge and intervention.
In the case present, Atty. Carbon is teaching law subject to law school that requires application of legal knowledge and intervention.
Therefore, Atty. Carbon is still engaged in the practice of law.
very helpful po ito Atty.
Welcome po. May poll po ako sa community post ko about my 10,000 special. Please vote po.
hi! will be taking our Compre this year, sir. thanks for the video.
My pleasure po! Good luck!
This is helpful atty! Hope to collab with you Panero!
Thank you for watching! Hit me up sa FB ko po.
Rarely taught na topic to sa lawschool
Yung nga po weird eh. Hindi ito tinuru directly. Matuto ka nalang via trial and error.
Yes, Atty. Carbon is engage in the practice of law.
Case law provides that, a person is engage in the practice of law when he perform acts that requires the application of legal knowledge and training.
Here, Atty. Carbon is engage in the practice of law because he is teaches negotiable instrument law, an act which requires the application of legal knowledge and training.
Thus, Atty Carbon is engage in the practice of law.
Nice answer. Always make it simple!
Salamat po dito malaking tulong
My pleasure po!
Where have you been all this time? Thanks for your videos. I'm now reconsidering the Bar. I just don't know exactly when, since I've been out of momentum for many years now.
I delayed my second take for three years. I know of someone who passed after YEARS of not taking the bar. It's not about momentum, it is about learning new things that are covered by the bar, and unlearning old doctrines and law.
Good luck! Glad I could help.
Buti natagpuan ko ito....support na kita Atty.
Thank you po!
Idol🥰
sir.. may video poba kayo ng issue spotting?
I have a question, can you apply as a Corporate Lawyer when, your field of study is civil litigation?
wow... nice topic, It motivates me to become a lawyer but I have a poor command in English...hahahahha
Thank you for this. It helps. May mga profs ako na swak ako sa taste but most hnd. I will try these method of answering. Mostly kasi ang sagot ko is
No. The supreme court ruled that..
Yown hnd pala maganda point nun haha. Oh well salamat po atty I will practice this style during my law school now. I am a first year btw
Thanks for watching and good luck!
Pwede mo pa din gamitin yang ganyan kung 1-2pts lang tanong at maikli yung doctrine.
Hi Atty. Palacio, Im ur subscriber :)
Here is my answer to sub-question B:
"Yes, Atty. Carbon is qualified to become a Regional Trial Court Judge.
According to Sec 15 of Batas Pambansa Blg 129: A person must be natural born citizen; atleast 35 years of age; atleast 10 years engaged in practice of law in the philippines.
In the case at bar, Atty Carbon is 36 years of age; he is engaged in practice of law for 12 years. However, being in trial or litigation work is not a requirement; it must be emphasize that having practice for law for more than 10 years is the most indispensable requirement to be qualified since practice of law requires legal training, knowledge and experience.
For these reasons, Atty. Carbon is qualified to be a Regional Trial Court Judge."
I'm hoping you will critique this Atty. Bacon! 1st year law student here 🖐️ Thank you po sa mga videos nyo, real help po 💪
I’m not Atty Palacio, but I think you got the point, just not the delivery. There’s a little bit of redundancy. It couldve been shorter.
@@saigajv Thanks for the comment :)
Y, who is a businessman, and Atty. X are good friends. Due to their closeness, Atty. X was able to borrow ₱300,000.00 from Y, which amount was intended to refurbish Atty. X's law office.Months after, Y got into a contractual dispute with Z, one of his business partners. Hence, Y sought the legal services of Atty. X for the filing of the proper action against Z. In consideration for his legal services, Y paid Atty. X an acceptance fee of ₱50,000.00.Unfortunately, Atty. X and Y's relationship turned sour. Thus, all communications between them were cut, and worse, Atty. X failed to file the required initiatory pleading against Z on the date agreed upon. Aggrieved, Y filed an administrative complaint, seeking that Atty. X be sanctioned and that the ₱50,000.00 acceptance fee and the ₱300,000.00 personal loan be returned to him. (a) What administrative violation/s did Atty. X commit, if any? Explain. (5%) (b) May Y's prayer for the return of the ₱50,000.00 acceptance fee and the ₱300,000.00 personal loan prosper?
Hi Atty. Any book recomendation for incoming shs na mag ta take ng law in college. Para may alam lang po ako pag 1st year na sa college.
Up.
Yung constitution book for college po ang best na masuggest ko for SHS.
Apologies and thanks, Torni.
Do you have a video for digesting cases?
Wala po pero si Lex In Motion meron siyang video about case digests
Is this another way of answering? Because I saw some "suggested" answers which are composed of only 1 paragraph.
Yup. UP suggested answer is one.
You can answer that way if you want, but you run the risk of presenting a confusing answer.
The 4 paragraph method is used to make sure you present an answer that is logical and easy to understand.
Kailangan po ba magfocus lang sa SC bar syllabus? Yun lang ba magiging source ng questions? Thank you atty.
Opo. If ever man meron outside ng scope, hindi nila sinasali na sa bilangan ng grades. At least, yan nangyari in the past.
@@baconpalacio wow, thanks atty. sa pagsagot!
Dapat po ba maganda sulat mo sa Essay?
I want to be a lawyer someday.. what reading materials attorney should I read first to learn the law? Thank you😁
Basta po galingan mo basic English at logic mo po, at yung destress mo. Yan ang best prep for law school.
Sir Palacio worth it ba law school?
Gusto mo bang maging abugado po?
@@baconpalacio oo naman kaso di ko alam kung kaya ko... I mean mahirap naman school namin due to advance curriculum na kaya ko naman pero di ko alam kung kaya ko ng law school o hindi... Imprumtu at extemporaneous wala talaga ako jan tsaka debate konti lang experience ko grade 10 pa po ako nag dedecide lng naman kung ano ba talagang worth it kunin. Dati may passion na gustong gusto ko talga ako sa law tas nawala na dahil nga kaklaseng toh makaka discourage pero ngayon nasa isip ko na kung e persue ko ba o hindi... At tsaka turuan ba tayo sa popesor the art of being bias?
@@baconpalacio hahanap ako ng paraan para ibalik ang passion ko sa law maging ok na cguro.
@@alphaofficial9778 mahirap sagutin kasi tanong mo unless ikaw mismo ang mag decide.
Ganito, decide now to take law. As in focus everything dun. If it does not work out, may plan B naman.
In my case, wala akong plan B.
@@alphaofficial9778 explore explore din. Malay mo bumalik kasi may creative outlet ka
Sir, advisable po ba mag aral ng law sa gabi habang nag tatrabahu sa tanghali from 7am to 5pm? Engineering po pre-law ko.
Pwede naman pero hindi full load siguro po. So partial load siguro kada sem.
Sir. Atty, pareho lang po ba yung way ng pagsagot sa Philippine Bar Exam at sa Special Bar Exam ng mga Muslim...?
Hi atty! Good day just a quick question po. Can a bs tourism management graduate apply for a law school? Thank you po.
Hi po. Sorry medyo nabitin ako sa sub question b. So pwede po ba sagutin yon ng additional information needed to determine if atty carbon is qualified to be an rtc judge?
Good afternoon po Sir. May isang tanong lang po sana kame. Sana po makita nyo po ito.
When citing from decided cases po when answering exam questions do we need to answer in verbatim as to how the court specifically wrote it in the decided cases po; or do we just need to get the main idea/concept of that decision po and re-state it po without it having to exactly look like as to how it was stated in the court decision po?
Example:
ANSWERING USING THE ORIGINAL STATEMENT IN THE DECIDED CASE: (VERBATIM)
According to Tanada v. Angara, G.R. No. 118295,
the sovereignty of a state therefore cannot in fact and in reality be considered absolute. Certain restrictions enter into the picture: (1) limitations imposed by the very nature of membership in the family of nations and (2) limitations imposed by treaty stipulations.
ANSWERING BY JUST RE-STATING THE IDEA OF THE DECIDED CASE (NON-VERBATIM)
According to Tanada v. Angara, G.R. No. 118295, the Philippines is subject to restriction by its membership in the family of nations, and the limitations imposed of treaty limitations.
Sana po masagot nyo po ito. It would really help me and my classmates po on how to better study since we would know kung kailangan ba talaga word per word na i memorize yung case decisions, or kung okay lang na yung primary ideas/concepts po ang ma intindihan namin ng maigi since we could just paraphrase or re-state the decision when answering questions po without it having to exactly look like how it was written in the SC decision po. Salamat po Sir.
pano kung mag retiro n me atty. may makuha ba ako sa agency nmin po ! gawa sa agency pero ang mother comp. ay megaworld ty, pano po ?
Pwede po ba after 10 years from undergraduate before mag-enter sa law school? Hindi po ba nageexpire 'yun? SALAMAT PO!
Ok lang po ba na pareho ang opening statement (conclusion), sa closing (conclusion)?
Hindi pala all around yung mga lawyers? Kasi may nakita akong mga family lawyer, criminal lawyer, etc.
Opo. Kahit nga sa Family Law may estate lawyer at may annulment lawyer, etc.
Law is too broad to master, in my own opinion. Imagine, you study 8 bar subjects that are further divided into atleast 3 more subjects in law school (i.e. Criminal Law 1, Criminal Law 2, and Special Penal Laws are major components of Criminal Law).
In my own opinion, corporate law is the best field of law in terms of salary.
Good day po atty. May online law schooling po ba dto sa Pilipinas? Salamat po sa sagot. Subscribed.
Wala po akong alam na law school that offers online eh.
Balak ko po sanang mag-enrol ngayong taon ng law. Ano po ba ang pwede ko nang basahin at kabisaduhin na makatutulong po sakin?Ano po yung mga basics na dapat aralin?
May constitution ka ng undergrad diba? Yung libro mo doon pwede mong basahin.
May constitution ka ng undergrad diba? Yung libro mo doon pwede mong basahin.
Essay po ba ang bar exam?
Hello po ano pong best advice nyo po sa mga gusto mag aral sa law school ang pre-law nila engineering. Thanks po
Continue mo lang Eng mo. Magugulat ka at magagamit mo yan sa law practice mo.
Read your constitutional law textbook habang nasa college
Sir @@baconpalacio Ano po ang best reference na textbook for Phil. Constitution and English grammar po? Thanks po.
English grammar? Wala akong alam eh.
De Leon ok na for college level. Or kung ano prescribed ng school mo.
Sir @@baconpalacio last question Ano po best advice nyo sa mga engineer na gusto magaral sa law school, ganun pa din po ba same lng po ba ng sagot un sa una kong tanong? Tnx po.
Totoo lang no different iyan kahit polsci kapa eh.
Learn logic and argumentation, learn at least basic English
Ilang taon po para maging abogado?
Atty ano po answer sa (b)
Good day po sir.Ano po ang mga best books to read para sa mga mageenrol ng law?
Yung required mo ng mga teachers mo. Kasi dun ka susunod sa kanila eh. HOWEVER, wag ka muna bumili agad. MAnghiram ka muna sa library ninyo for 2 weeks then decide whether bibili ka o hindi.
Atty. Bacon, para po sa mga law school exams, how do we answer a question na maraming legal basis pwede I-cite? How do we know which ones to use? Thank you!
Thank you for comnenting.
You need to spot the issue po. Usually, isang article lang kelangan mo to answer a problem.
Minsan kelangan mo talaga ng multiple articles to answer a question. Ex: para maresolve ang vicarious liabilty kelangan mo sagutin kung may quasi delict ba muna.
On which ones to use, use the call to guide you kung alin.
Kung open ended essay yan, yun talaga kelangan mo matuto mag issue spotting.
required po ba na fluent na english sa recitation sa law school?
At least basic English mo dapat maganda po both written and verbal. Pero kung mas maganda ang command mo ng English language the better.
I'm just 14 years old pero parang naiinspire akong maging lawyer....
Go po! Maganda din yung marami kang alam sa batas po. Hindi ka maabuso unlike yung ibang tao na walang alam po.
CE JU vlogs same
apply din po ba ang 4 paragraph rule kung ang weight nung item ay 2.5 points lang po..thank you
Alam mo iniisip ko nga ito ng nag take ako ng bar.
ATM, I'm thinking kung yung tanong ay pwede sagutin ng 4 paragraph rule, siguro tangalin mo lang yung first paragraph kung 2.5 points lang.
Para tipid oras.
@@baconpalacio thank you sir
sir, bakit hindi advisable na mag cite ng case sa pag sagot? ex. in the case of cayetano vs. monsod, hindi ko kasi maintindihan meron nagsasabi mag cite meron sabi wag daw. ano ang reason bakit hindi dapat mag cite? and ok lang ba mag cite ng provisions? o kelangan laging general statement like "civil law provides"
Because it is risky to cite specific provisions or case titles.
If mag cite ka mismo ng provision or case title dapat verbatim mo i cote yun.
Also, my concept ng stare decisis. So dapat swak na swak yung case na i-cite mo dun sa problem.
Factor in mo pa na our memory fails in times of great stress.
Thus, it is risky to cite exact provisions of law and cases.
Wag mo gamitin ang "Civil Law" napaka lawak nun hihi
Kahit na Civil Code ay sobrang lawak pa din noon.
@@baconpalacio ah ok broad ang civil law or code, so what do i have to cite? for example sir question about property? what do i have to cite? if ever hindi ko matandaan ang exact art. sa civil code sa property, salamat!
@@pastormael3362 "According to the Law on Property/Sales/Contracts/Obligation...." or cite by book and title number
@@baconpalacio ok sir, malinaw na sakin, salamat sir sa tips, hopefully ma impress ang prof ko hindi ko kasi mahuli kiliti nila, para bang nagluluto ako ng sinigang na lahat sila iba iba ang gusto ng timpla sa sinigang. hindi ako makagawa ng generic na lasa na lahat sila magugustuhan.
Hi sir. Apologies for going beyond the content of this video. Ask lang po sana ako how the actual Bar Review is being conducted?:) Araw-araw ba ang klase or what?
Yan po topic ng lastest videos ko po. Yung part two simulan ko nang i-edit after ko sagutin lahat ng mga tanong dito at magawa ko subtitles ng latest video ko.
Pwede po ba pumasok sa Law School ang Educ graduate? LPT na po ako but I really wanted to be a Lawyer. Thank you.
Opo. Pwede basta at least 4 year course.
Relate much, ma'am. I'm also an LPT but I really want to pursue law
Go po kaya ninyo yan! =)
Maraming salamat pooo atty.
Atty. ask ko lng po, ilang taon po ang pag aaral pra maging lawyer bago mag take ng bar at ano pong korso?
2nd po pag 40 npo ba wla npo bang pag asa? salamat po in advance God bless po..
Years old? May classmate ako senior citizen na po nakatapos pa din ng law school
As a general rule, 4 years po ang law after mo nag graduate sa 4 years undergrad course.
A.. ok po salamat po..
balak kpo sana kso dnpo cguro maccredit mga units ko sa college dko po kc ntapos..
if ever po ba na kumuha ako ng pol sci. na 4years tpos deretso law, pwede pa po ba un 4years pa sa pag aaral ng law tama po noh?
sobrang salamat po atty. sna po dpo kyo mag sawa sa pagtatanong ko.. kc ung mga katulad nyo po ang hinahangaan ko..
God bless po
Tanong lang sir ano b pagkaiba ng board exam at bar exam
Bar exam is a licensure exam for you to practice legal law
Board exam is under the regulation of PRC while the bar exam is under the regulation of the supreme court. In fact, even though you passed the bar exam pero may di ka na meet na requirements di ka padin pede mag practice ng law.
Public Administration po course ko Atty. Pwde po ba ako mag law????
Opo! Basta 4 year course
Ano pong sagot sa sub question b?
Good afternoon, Atty. Paano po pag nakapag cite ng provision pero tama naman, negative po ba iyon? Tsaka po, okay lang po ba na 1 page per answer sa dalawa o tatlong questions per set of facts? And finally, tsaka may minus points po ba erasures at kunyare binura 1st premise kasi nag changed of mind ka. May ganyan kasi ako Atty. Thank you.
Kung nag cite ka, basta on all fours yung kaso then ok lang. Pero iniiwasan talaga iyon kasi rare na on all fours eh.
Ok lang basta pinapayagan ng exam rules yung multiple answers per page.
Basta sinunod mo yung rules on erasures ok lang iyon. May erasures din ako nung pumasa ako ng bar.
@@baconpalacio What I mean po is nag cite ng provision of law. And is it okay po yung 1 page per subquestion.
Ok lang pero make sure na yan yung most applicable na batas.
Second question, yes ok lang yun.
@@baconpalacio Thank you, Atty. Thank you so much for your response.
My pleasure
Thank you Atty.Palacio.
Thank you too! Keep safe!
Rate nyo po experienced nyo sa pagpasok sa buhay ng law(rate nyo po 1-10)hihi thanks
Im 15 watching a bunch of these videos lol
hehehe thanks for watching. But, this might push you to take law. Malay mo.
Sir gaano po ba katagal mag aral ng law totoo bang 10 years😅
4 years po sa college, then 4 years sa law school po
Bacon Palacio thank you po sir Godbless po goodluck po sa career and stay safe na rin po
Stay safe din kayo.
Happy to help.
Salamat po!
Kailangan bang e memorize lahat laws?
No. Impossible po yun. Yung mga FAQ lang per subject mo sa law school
@@baconpalacio hehehe highschool student po ako na interesado ng law so di ko pa alam ano meaning ng FAQ?
@@baconpalacio kasi sa mga k drama din halos e mention nila ang laws. Sa bar exam po situational po ba yun at mag mention ba dapat ng mga articles? At republic acts?
@@alphaofficial9778 frequently asked questions. Pasol ka muna ng law po para magets mo mga sasabihin ko.
Promise, makakalimutan mo yan bago ka pa matapos ng college
Saan ba na question pwede ma gamit yung: (I mean pwede bayan gamitin sa questions? If yes, kailan?). Thank you
Issue
Rule
Application
Conclusion
So you are asking me para saan ang IRAC format. Tama?
@@baconpalacio opo
@@baconpalacio Tsaka isang tanong lang po. Same track rin po bang yung kukunin mo para maging prosecutor?
Para lang pong 4 paragraph rule.
Gagamitin mo ang IRAC para sagutin mga essay exams. It will help you organize yourself by focusing on the important bits of the problem.
YES. Kelangan maging abugado ka muna before ka magiging fiscal.
@@baconpalacio ahh salamat mo po!
If you like my content please consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/baconpalacio
Playlist - Philippine Bar Exams and Law School: ruclips.net/p/PLjsTsqbrwGR7YSWrIZBI7vrT8H0KVQuvM
timestamp:
What this video is about: 00:00
Practical tips for the Bar Exams and Law School: 00:18
Four paragraph method and essay questions in the bar exams and law school: 02:08
How to apply the four paragraph method in the bar exam and law school: 04:02
Look for the facts: 05:08
Read the next call of the essay question: 05:22
Plain English: 05:38
Answering five point essay questions: 06:13
Answering open ended essay questions: 06:39
Issue spotting in essay questions: 06:53
Answer to essay sub-question "b": 07:24
Please support the channel by clicking the link before you checkout from Shopee:
1) Veco Journal Notebook 6x8.5inches - shp.ee/j7dnrzc
2) Veco Journal Notebook 7x10inches - shp.ee/w9ziy4a
3) Platinum Preppy (Fine) - shp.ee/mxdgmdi
4) Pilot Fountain Pen Ink (30ml) - shp.ee/uif2euu
This video is NOT sponsored. Some product links are affiliate links which means if you buy anything I'll receive a small commission.
pangarap ko talaga mag aral ng law.kaso hirap ako sa english😢
Kaya mo yan. Tsaga lang.
I just wanted to ask when you're in the moment of answering the bar did you realy got nervous?Is it hard to answer? Do you think a normal person can did that?Gosh there are so many doubt in me.Im really nervous
Hindi ako kabado talaga eh. Kung hindi ko alam ang sagot, edi hindi ko tama ang sagot ko. Ganun lang yun. Pero pumasa naman ako kaya cool yun! hehehe
hi Atty. i am a freshman law student, magmimidterm exam na po kami this September but still i have a hard time on how to answer exam questions na to the point na naiiyak na ako.
Hi, thank you for the comment. In what way na hindi ka makasagot?
At anong type ng tanong?
Im trying the essay atty. But i can't express what i wanted to answer po..... It is my 5th time watching this particular video and I must admit I am learning bit by bit and will help on my upcoming midterm exam.I am taking down the 4 paragraph rule on answering essay.
I'm glad that you are learning something from the video.
Maybe it is because you are not used to it yet. In my case, it took me the better part of my first year to get used to it.
Keep at it.
If you are up for it, try posting your answer here. Use the legal ethics question from 2017 and 2018 Philippine bar exams.
Dapat maayos Yung Sulat kasi my chances na dimaiintindihan ang sagot ung mo
Short answers, penmanship and margins.
Thanks for watching =)
1. If the answer is "No, X may not use...", will that be a violation of the rule on double negatives?
2. Some are saying that you should not answer "it depends". If the answer calls for a qualification, how will you answer the question without using the words "it depends".
3. Do you answer questions with "partly correct"?
1) wag mo na ilagay yung NO.
2) RARE po kasi na "It depends" ang sagot sa bar eh. Kaya pumili ka nalang po ng side.
3) Rare din na merong partly correct sa bar. So as a rule, pumili ka ng side.
Ang gulo po, yung comment and like dapat po sa dulo iyon nilalagay.
Thank you po for this =)
a) Yes, Atty Carbon is engaged in the practice of law
According to Jurisprudence, the “practice of law” is not only limited to litigation and trial work.
With that being said, him teaching Negotiable Instruments Law in a law school is considered practice of law ince this requires knowledge, training, and application of the law
Therefore, Atty. Carbon is engaged in the practice of law.
b) Yes, Atty Carbon is qualified to be a Regional Trial Court judge, if appointed.
According to B.P. 129, Qualifications of an RTC Judge shall be 35 years of age and shall be engaged in the practice of law for at least 10 years
Since Atty Carbon is 36 years old and has 12 years in the practice of law, he is qualified to be appointed as Regional Trial Court judge.
Atty bacon meron po ba kayong materials dyan for bar exam tips pwede makahingi po ng soft copy. Jppastrana17@yahoo.com thanks a lot!
Wala po eh. Luma na lahat po.