How to do Gravimetric Analysis in Chemistry (with calculations and examples!)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 окт 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @asuasonia8085
    @asuasonia8085 Год назад +10

    You just helped me out right now. Been really confused about gravimetric technique. Plus I really enjoyed watching you talk and wait😅. Thanks a million

  • @MariiaEmelianova-s9n
    @MariiaEmelianova-s9n 10 месяцев назад +4

    The best explanation I have ever seen

    • @andrewjustin256
      @andrewjustin256 10 месяцев назад

      I couldn't agree more! His video is the only video I found on RUclips; there are no other creators creating this lesson.

  • @SandaraPaera
    @SandaraPaera 4 месяца назад

    I learned a lot. You explained it in a very detailed manner. Thank you so much. This video is a gold.

  • @ur_adit
    @ur_adit 5 месяцев назад +4

    how the heck are you so underrated

  • @DerekIzzi
    @DerekIzzi 4 месяца назад

    I learned more from this video than I did in my high school chemistry class. Partly me and partly poor presentation methods.

  • @ASHUTOSHKUMAR-oe7xx
    @ASHUTOSHKUMAR-oe7xx 3 месяца назад

    Great teacher , and so thankful to you sir , 🙏

  • @OrdenJust
    @OrdenJust 6 месяцев назад

    This is a really good explanation! What I am wondering about are some tables that I find in the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th ed., (1973-1974) , that have the title "Gravimetric Factors and Their Logarithms."
    How do I make a correspondence between this table and what you just did?
    For example, the CRC table shows
    Weighed: Al (aluminum, of course)
    Sought: Al2O3 (aluminum oxide)
    Factor: 1.88946
    Log of Factor +10: 10.27634
    Reciprocal of Factor: 0.52925
    Log of Reciprocal of Factor +10: 9.72366
    Now, some calculation shows that the "Factor" is the ratio of the molecular weight of Al2O3 to the molecular weight of Al2. So that matches nicely with your explanation in the video. What I am wondering about is, why does this table go on to include "log of factor", "reciprocal of factor" and "log of reciprocal of factor"? These seem as if they are not needed for the sort of gravimetric analysis you demonstrated. Are these relics from the days before calculators when one had to do computations by hand?

  • @Eunice828
    @Eunice828 7 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you so much for this

  • @gabrielmcpherson5756
    @gabrielmcpherson5756 6 месяцев назад

    Thank you so much sir. It is completely clear to me now.

  • @PardonNkandu
    @PardonNkandu 7 месяцев назад

    Thank you so much...i really needed this.

  • @ZChrist_jesus
    @ZChrist_jesus 6 месяцев назад

    wow u make it easy to understand ,thank u

  • @andrewjustin256
    @andrewjustin256 10 месяцев назад

    7:07 Señor, yo tengo una pregunta. By adding water, it does compute to the memory that we are not changing the number of moles of KI, but aren't we changing the volume and thus molarity because molarity is moles divided by volume?

  • @danielmwikisa4920
    @danielmwikisa4920 7 месяцев назад

    Thank I needed this

  • @jimmyMagdato
    @jimmyMagdato 10 месяцев назад +1

    the 0.00369 is the mol of combination for Pbi2 (Lead Iodized). My question is, how come that the 0.00369 is the mol solely for pb?? so supposedly, the mole for Pb is lesser than 0.00369, right?

    • @layzymarky7351
      @layzymarky7351 7 месяцев назад

      n(PbI2)= nPb + nI
      let x be the moles of Pb
      0.00369= x + 2x
      2x

  • @mivineotnabab9669
    @mivineotnabab9669 8 месяцев назад

    Please make a video about titration method

  • @rizwankk1551
    @rizwankk1551 10 месяцев назад +1

    Tooooooooo much good

  • @tysanameleo5633
    @tysanameleo5633 8 месяцев назад

    Thank you sir

  • @Mmjjap
    @Mmjjap 21 день назад +1

    If you cut too much talk and camera flirting and get into the procedure with no frills, you can get this video in 5 minutes. Then, your video will be more educational than not. Students are pressed for time; you know that. I learned a lot, great job!

  • @محمدعليآلغبان-غ5ف
    @محمدعليآلغبان-غ5ف 5 месяцев назад +5

    You better name your channel "Heisenberg".. 🗿

    • @Viablepride
      @Viablepride 5 месяцев назад +1

      😂😂 that's right