I couldn't agree more. I was recommended this movie ('82) a while back and it was a Friday night and every Friday we have takeaways and so as I'm eating and watching the movie, the dog scene comes and I just had to stop the movie and run outside for a cigarette because I could feel everything in my stomach just coming back up. 😭
@@daegnaxqelil2733 they didn't just planned. They actually did all these scenes with practical effects, grimm, and animatronics just like in the original movie. They even filmed them in this way. You can find btc footage of making practical effects. It looks really cool and much better and scarier then they did it in final cut with CGI.
But what happens to the victims counciousness? Do they permanently die after the assimilations or are they still counciouss enough to see, hear and feel what the thing is doing?
I love that the reason why fire seems to be the only somewhat effective way of dealing with the thing simply because nobody has any idea where to point a gun.
Well, it's also that every cell of The Thing is an individual, thinking organism, so the only way to put it down permanently is to destroy every cell beyond repair, but I get what you're saying.
John Carpenter’s version is one of the best movies of all time. The 2011 version was fun but never had the same sense of dread and isolation like the original.
82 version is overrated. It was never about "the thing" it was about the plot, the reason why you think the older is better is because the plot will always be linear, and the second time isn't as impactful as the first.
I genuinely still love how they explained the two faced Thing since when you watch the original you have no damn clue how it happened, which honestly would’ve been better to not be explained because it makes it so much more disturbing, but having the answer is also really cool
I honestly feel that combining practical effects and CGI is the best way to go (2004's Spider-Man 2 movie is a good example). But I agree that the 2011 movie (The Thing) going full CGI did not do it justice.
The 2011 version wasn't supposed to use CGI either, they had all the animatronics, a lot of scenes already shot with them but it was decided (By some moron for sure) that it all needs to be scrapped and reshot/redone in post to replace all the practical effects with this shit CGI. Recommend going and watch the behind the scenes of the 2011 version, there is a lot of material with all the stuff they were supposed to originally use there. Big shame.
I loved both movies, I remember seeing behind the scenes of the prequel, they used practical effects. Grigg's transformed face there was legit terrifying. I don't know if the picture is still up, it looked like real gore.
That was almost six years before the Bite of 87 happened in an abandoned restaurant full of animatronic mascots who became possessed by the spirits of the missing children who were murdered in that very place.
The 82 version is just unbelievable, it really is terrifying, in my opinion id say the 1982 the thing, predator and T2 are the best sci fi movies to date!
It is. When I saw it aged 11 in 1984 I thought it was incredible. Now I think it's one of the best films ever made, along with Alien, Aliens, Predator and Terminator. My 15 year old son just watched these, and he thought they were fantastic too. We watched The Thing in 4K on a big TV with surround sound and he was on the edge of his seat the whole time. Cinema evolves, of course, but it is sad to think that movies like that will never get made again. The use of labour of love physical effects, the superb cinematography with wide anamorphic lenses, the slower editing, the woke free casting and storylines... that era's gone. Sad.
I agree, you can love the original and not shit on the newer one. That fusion scene really fucked me up. He went from being saveable to no hope with the face fusion.
@@Trill104looked like a goofy cartoon to me man that shit was bad cgi at its finest, ESPECIALLY IF YOU COMPARE IT TO THE PRACTICAL EFFECT DELECTED VERSION OF THE SAME SCENE
Пока не было компьютерной графики, умели действительно снимать страшные фильмы ужасов, на тот момент времени. Да и вообще фильмы тех лет, были гораздо лучше, чем современные.
Amazing how effects almost thirty years older than the newest iteration manage to be 100x more impressive. To be fair, I don't hate the prequel as much as most, mainly because I appreciate the went the prequel route instead of a straight remake. I can at least appreciate that some thought had to go into that, especially to line up everything to how it is in the original. Wasn't done well, but it's less lazy than just remaking everything beat for beat.
@Dislike2011 I'm aware...I also noted the following " ...before the original for the storyline." It's called reading between the lines...even without saying the word prequel, I still mentioned the word "storyline ". 🍪
Can we just take the time to appreciate how good the thing from 1982 looks I mean like at this time only a bit of cgi was ever used and with out that John Carpenter made one of the best ever si-fi films ever made!
the practical effects just felt so much more visceral and scary to me, like I'd lose my appetite watching it. for some reason CGI just doesn't gross me out because I know it isn't real, and the practical effects gross me out more probably because I know it's physical and something people could actually touch. the goop and and limbs and all that were fabricated to look as real as possible, and they still look/feel more real than CGI
Just to think of all the beatiful practical effects we were gonna get for the Prequel, sure the characters are a bunch of idiots and it would still be a generic shitty monster flick, but a one with good effects at least
Cause you love overgored things that barely move and are clumsy as hell? Lmao. The thing in 82 was so slow and useless that i find it comical how people died to it.
but how would you follow them up? being serious here... my guess would have a rescue team shows up after months of no contact with either team and more "Things" are found deep in the ice. but thats as far as i got.
Many nostalgic people prefer the old movie from 82, but I can't, I think the 2011 movie is much scarier and more real. Only sound of ancient creature is good, practical effects of it some have aged very badly.
Agreed. I prefer 82 but it's easy to tell what's a genuine criticism vs nostalgia when people don't even mention 82's flaws. I mean, the Blair monster was lame and a let down for a final creature.
@@marsha-madness-super-badnessIt's pretty clear that it's just nostalgia when people only mention the practical effects and nothing else, they completely ignore the acting and direction which were what really made the film so scary, the truth is they just want an excuse to criticize the new
I can’t stand people not liking the prequel. I think they compliment each other extremely well and it’s over the fact that a 2011 film is using cgi? It didn’t even use cgi for everything from what I saw in a behind the scenes on the film, they did indeed use practical effects for some shots. I just don’t see the argument over practical vs cgi effects, they are both equally as good and bad as each other.
I remember I watched the 1982 version in the theatre when I was just a teenager... The crowd was minimal and I was sitting alone at the back. I was seriously terrified and keep covering my eyes! 😂
What I find interesting about the lore of the first film is that apparently when the thing arrived on earth it was most likely not a crew member but rather had killed whoever was inside, imagine the possibilities of theories, a race decimated by the thing and trying to escape ended up leading to the earth lol
The original is a master piece but Oml it can burn in hell😂 shit fr scarred me and to this day makes my stomach turn. Absolutely a masterpiece of a film man.
The fact that there was a remake proves they didn't understand why the original was so great. The brilliance of the Thing is its ability to generate utter paranoia and confusion. The movie, like the Thing itself, is complex and unpredictable. It didn't seek to create a sense of danger with chase scenes, creative gore and jumpscares, but with an overarching feeling of unease and complete helplessness. The characters are trapped in the station with a constantly changing and shifting malicious entity that may be anywhere or anyone, they have no idea who it will attack, when, or how, and even at the end, they never know if it's still there. That alone makes it a truly terrifying movie, and the bizarrely horrifying practical effects lended to it perfectly. The fact someone decided the story would be served by "updating" it with CGI graphics and including painfully boring Hollywood chase scenes and jumpscares is really an insult to John Carpenter's masterpiece.
I'd be curious to who would winner in 1 on 2 fight/battle, with The THING vs. the White Spikes (The Tomorrow War Film) and The Death Angels (A Quiet Place Films). The Commentators can be the Alien and Predator.
@@rafayg7376 id say the Thin because as soon as you touch it it will begin to assimilate you and Death angels have a knack for impaling their victims as well
At 4:46 you can hear someone screaming. But it is obvious that no one is. It is added just for atmosphere, but it doesn't make sense. The characters start yelling and screaming afterwards
Первый раз посмотрел этот шедевр в видеосалоне где-то в 87 году, когда был в спортлагере. Я был просто в шоке от крутизны этого фильма. Сейчас такое не снимают...
The bit where Mcreedy and Doc check out Norwegian camp and Doc says my god what thee hells happened here and as they walk outside Doc says is that a man in there or something one of the greatest Movies 🎬 ever made
The 82' original was a groundbreaking classis with fantastic effects. The 2011 remake was I believe a prequel? And still a very good one at that! Don't know why so many people hate on it!?
Sorry this is such a long reply, I kinda went into a rant, but I feel I tried to at least somewhat explain my feelings on it. Yes the 2011 one is a prequel. And I agree, not a bad movie. It’s main issue stems from how most of what it does is derivative of the original and it’s effects are pretty lackluster. Most of the transformations and effects are done with CGI and just don’t hold up well. Specifically the guy on the helicopter whose face opens up and a bunch of twizzler lookin things fly out of his chest. Or the two guys that fuse together to become the thing they find at the beginning of the original movie. That creature known as “split-face” was originally going to be created with practical effects (which you can find test footage of on Amalgamated Dynamics RUclips channel) and looked damn good. However, Universal Studios didn’t think people would want to see practical effects, so they told Amalgamted Dynamics to replace it all with CG. So a lot of it looks rushed and just plain goofy. That whole scene at the end of the movie where Kate is exploring the ship and finds that “reactor core” thing made of tetris blocks just looks stupid, not to mention the weird worm thing that assimilated her boss and just had his face on it still even though it doesn’t need to hide at that point. Even that creature was supposed to look far different and more legitimately creepy, but again, they were forced to change it for Universal.
I haven't seen the OG The Thing but these clips show that the classic one also had these moments where a character just stares idiotically at the monster waiting to be killed is just so hilarious 😂
John Carpenter's The Thing will always have the best ending, and the most terrifying monster ever. To this day, it will never get old. Even 2011 Thing did good for its debut.
Let's be real. The graphics were fantastic for their respective years. 1982 for a classic and inventive way to show gore during the beginning and 2011 when CGI looked just as well when it was at its peak.
People fail to realise they all grown up an a movie that was good then will basically phase out, the thing back then was a masterpiece but how many of u can sit down a look at it like u did 20 yrs back cmon b real the visuals will look like shit say what u want its true
I feel like the 2011 one sucked because of the cgi and also because they used background music to make suspense, the original was already so creepy it didn't need background music, just raw sound to freak you out.
This movie walks a fine line between making you want to scream and making you want to vomit
I couldn't agree more. I was recommended this movie ('82) a while back and it was a Friday night and every Friday we have takeaways and so as I'm eating and watching the movie, the dog scene comes and I just had to stop the movie and run outside for a cigarette because I could feel everything in my stomach just coming back up. 😭
1982 is best
scromit
I did that both once, vomits first then screamin "WTF". That's the first and the last time i ever saw the 1982 movie
I'd say that's accurate.
I love the practical effects of the 1982 version. I have a deeper appreciation for them than CGI.
One of my all time favorite movies. 🤩
they planned practical effects in 2011 film
@@daegnaxqelil2733 they didn't just planned. They actually did all these scenes with practical effects, grimm, and animatronics just like in the original movie. They even filmed them in this way. You can find btc footage of making practical effects. It looks really cool and much better and scarier then they did it in final cut with CGI.
@@protos9877 sight" Hollywood and their toxic CGI policy
The fake looking CGI crap doesn't hold a candle to the 1982 effects.
I find getting assimilated by The Thing is worse than death. You get to see and feel your skin and bones merge with the monster.
Yup
Obviously
But what happens to the victims counciousness? Do they permanently die after the assimilations or are they still counciouss enough to see, hear and feel what the thing is doing?
@@finlandguy427 some believe their consciousness is still active
@@finlandguy427probably...who knows
I love that the reason why fire seems to be the only somewhat effective way of dealing with the thing simply because nobody has any idea where to point a gun.
Well, it's also that every cell of The Thing is an individual, thinking organism, so the only way to put it down permanently is to destroy every cell beyond repair, but I get what you're saying.
Ну ещё кислота, жидкий азот, карозийный газ, сильная радиация.🤗✨
@@wd3185 yup i really scare when i see the blood test. So dangerous
True, which is why it always frustrated me to see them use the fire extinguisher. C'mon let that thing burn!!!
Or a very corrosive acid
You're sense of imagination has got to be over the roof to make a horror movie this good.
Inspired by the book but yes to put it together and visualize it fucking nuts
Its an adaptation and a remake of The Thing From Anither World (1951)
@@le_meme_man8983no it's literally not lmaoo
@@gigachad167 yes it literally is lmaoo
"You are sense of imagination"?
The blood test scene gets me every time😂 😂😂🙌
ONN MEEEE Dude i hella jumped!!!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣
@@ryansmart38 😂😂😂me too 😅
ALIENWARE
Lmao😂
Reminds me of south Park
That whole spider head was freaking amazing!
you gota beee fuucking kiiding
😮😲😲😭😳😳😳😳
Хорошо прожаренная, пальчики оближешь 😋
Scary
Yes! Man you can hear the heartbreaking when the flames hit the animations, it is a masterpiece
John Carpenter’s version is one of the best movies of all time. The 2011 version was fun but never had the same sense of dread and isolation like the original.
Agreed- I like both. Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Lars totally carried the 2nd one. It was also too much of a copy.
82 version is overrated. It was never about "the thing" it was about the plot, the reason why you think the older is better is because the plot will always be linear, and the second time isn't as impactful as the first.
@@Nobody-su9kmits obvious you’re into fitness
@@Nobody-su9kmnah you don’t even know what overrated means
@@TheSoCalledZoner1 it's self explanatory dude OVER RATED...
Always keep your flamethrower in tiptop condition
Yup lol u kno it!!!!!
No.1 way to solve alien invasions and most importantly, the homeless crisis.
@@SirEpifirelmao
Gotta admit, although '82 is better, Juliette's transformation in the 2011 prequel was just absolutely terrifying cool.
Jessica email address
Was it a prequel??
It was too rushed
@@vilmoskapitany9813 idk
@@vilmoskapitany9813 Yes
The 1982 version is way scarier
Yeah. It all looks and feels more organic.
Yeah it has a much better atmosphere and sense of dread and paranoia. But the 2011 prequel isn't bad, questionable CGI aside.
Practical effects always beat CGI
My country's TV station once played the '82 movie at midnight uncensored when i was a kid, i didn't sleep that night
AMONG US IS BETTER
I genuinely still love how they explained the two faced Thing since when you watch the original you have no damn clue how it happened, which honestly would’ve been better to not be explained because it makes it so much more disturbing, but having the answer is also really cool
Yeah as much as we like to harp on the CGI it is conceptually one of the most horrifying and slow deaths in either movie.
Si capisce anche dal primo film, in una delle scene finali, quando il professore fonde la sua mano con il volto di quell'altro tizio
I love how the head just stares at them through the doorway 🤣
I am pretty sure u like alot stuff about head
I thought it was funny when it thought it wouldn't be caught 'walking' away
if it didn't gawk at them it could've escaped.
The head: Rough day guys 😂
"hey there"
I always felt so bad for those dogs trapped in their with the Thing. They were ripping the fence apart with their teeth to get away.
82 was 100 times better, no cgi
I honestly feel that combining practical effects and CGI is the best way to go (2004's Spider-Man 2 movie is a good example). But I agree that the 2011 movie (The Thing) going full CGI did not do it justice.
The 2011 version wasn't supposed to use CGI either, they had all the animatronics, a lot of scenes already shot with them but it was decided (By some moron for sure) that it all needs to be scrapped and reshot/redone in post to replace all the practical effects with this shit CGI.
Recommend going and watch the behind the scenes of the 2011 version, there is a lot of material with all the stuff they were supposed to originally use there. Big shame.
Practical effects are the best... period.
82 will hold its own forever
Rob Bottin forever a genius
The Thing(1982) give me nightmares as a kid for days. The new one is good as well..
I loved both movies, I remember seeing behind the scenes of the prequel, they used practical effects. Grigg's transformed face there was legit terrifying. I don't know if the picture is still up, it looked like real gore.
2011 was the prequel
The thing 82 and The Alien will always be a timeless classic horror masterpiece.
The Fly too
And Predator. Alien, Aliens, Predator and The Thing are my favorite films of all time.
The blob too
9:49 that scream gave me chills
The first scene form The thing 1982 is my nightmare fuel.
That was almost six years before the Bite of 87 happened in an abandoned restaurant full of animatronic mascots who became possessed by the spirits of the missing children who were murdered in that very place.
Bruh, I’d rather run into Fnaf animatronics then the The Thing lmao 🤣
@@thegermanempire489 bro I'd rather get into assimilated by the thing than being a animatronic for a possessed mascots
For me its nightmare too
@@thatexitsignuser nope i'd rather get springlock than facing my nightmare fuel the thing
2:03 pov: you opened a bag of chips
3:04
@@ct_1409_echo_0 that’s more of a “when you see a fire rampaging throughout the halls and you and your friends are surviving like Minecraft”
Lmao 😂😂
@@bossshun9 lol
Persent day: aaaahhh monster run!
1982: fight fire with fire.
True
Alien, The Thing, Predator, Terminator. The best ever Sci Fi horror movies!
The 82 version is just unbelievable, it really is terrifying, in my opinion id say the 1982 the thing, predator and T2 are the best sci fi movies to date!
What's T2?
@@Fliko98 terminator 2, epic film!
No alien or aliens?
Check those movies out man as fan of predator movies check out the alien movies as well.
Don't forget Alien and Aliens!
It is. When I saw it aged 11 in 1984 I thought it was incredible. Now I think it's one of the best films ever made, along with Alien, Aliens, Predator and Terminator. My 15 year old son just watched these, and he thought they were fantastic too. We watched The Thing in 4K on a big TV with surround sound and he was on the edge of his seat the whole time.
Cinema evolves, of course, but it is sad to think that movies like that will never get made again. The use of labour of love physical effects, the superb cinematography with wide anamorphic lenses, the slower editing, the woke free casting and storylines... that era's gone. Sad.
While the CGI in the prequel isn't as good as 1982, the fusing scene still gives me chills
Body horror....
Thats what im saying when i first saw it, it actually scared me, ive havent been scared in a while
I agree, you can love the original and not shit on the newer one. That fusion scene really fucked me up. He went from being saveable to no hope with the face fusion.
@@Trill104looked like a goofy cartoon to me man that shit was bad cgi at its finest, ESPECIALLY IF YOU COMPARE IT TO THE PRACTICAL EFFECT DELECTED VERSION OF THE SAME SCENE
10:15 I just love it when two people come together in movies ❤
Beautiful moment 🙂
Yeah literally
4:52 this is both terrifying and hilarious lol like imagine if you were tied next to the Thing while it’s spazzing out
I like that he does the weird shaking thing
Dude really said hilarious, go bury your head in cow pie lmfao 😂
Пока не было компьютерной графики, умели действительно снимать страшные фильмы ужасов, на тот момент времени. Да и вообще фильмы тех лет, были гораздо лучше, чем современные.
9:49 that scream.......
This scene gets me every time 😨😳😰😓0:31
I remember playing the game on ps2, that sh*t was creepy as hell but had a lot of great mechanics
Amazing how effects almost thirty years older than the newest iteration manage to be 100x more impressive.
To be fair, I don't hate the prequel as much as most, mainly because I appreciate the went the prequel route instead of a straight remake. I can at least appreciate that some thought had to go into that, especially to line up everything to how it is in the original. Wasn't done well, but it's less lazy than just remaking everything beat for beat.
One of my favorite movies. I usually play the 2011 version before the original for the storyline
2011 is not a version, it's a prequel
@Dislike2011 I'm aware...I also noted the following " ...before the original for the storyline."
It's called reading between the lines...even without saying the word prequel, I still mentioned the word "storyline ".
🍪
The first scene is still censored today sometimes when this movies is shown on tv.
Can we just take the time to appreciate how good the thing from 1982 looks I mean like at this time only a bit of cgi was ever used and with out that John Carpenter made one of the best ever si-fi films ever made!
the practical effects just felt so much more visceral and scary to me, like I'd lose my appetite watching it. for some reason CGI just doesn't gross me out because I know it isn't real, and the practical effects gross me out more probably because I know it's physical and something people could actually touch. the goop and and limbs and all that were fabricated to look as real as possible, and they still look/feel more real than CGI
the 2011 had a lot of practical effects but universal studios made the director scrap all the practical effects
@@banan3467 that's so unfortunate :(
80s-90s were best. Creatures were made to look like real.
If someone asks me why I hate CGI so much I tell them to watch 1982's The Thing and they will have their answer.
Just to think of all the beatiful practical effects we were gonna get for the Prequel, sure the characters are a bunch of idiots and it would still be a generic shitty monster flick, but a one with good effects at least
Не найдут ответ, это не ответ на вопрос, почему ты ненавидишь компьютерную графику
Cause you love overgored things that barely move and are clumsy as hell? Lmao. The thing in 82 was so slow and useless that i find it comical how people died to it.
@@Nobody-su9kmtypical response of a zoomer with the attention span of a fly
blah blah blah, we get it, you are old.@@BesoffenerIslamist
When his belly opens up with the teeth and bites off his arms 😳😳😦
I first watched it when I was 11 😟
I’ll always love both versions of the thing it sucks that neither of them got a proper sequel or follow up storyline
but how would you follow them up? being serious here... my guess would have a rescue team shows up after months of no contact with either team and more "Things" are found deep in the ice. but thats as far as i got.
@@GladDestronger yeah exactly that’s a good way to go or start
There was a videogame sequel to the 1982 one
@@fnvfan0145 wait what really 😱😱😱
@@alonzobonilla yeah it was released early 2000's I believe, takes place shortly after the movie ended.
This is what I miss in todays scifi horror films. Before it was Animatronics, now it’s cgi.
Bro imagine if they did a recreation for this movie in 2021, graphics will look hella smexy
Nah they would ruin it
Personaly i think the more modern the cgi the worse it looks
in dunno havr your seen cgi lately. thanks tobmarvel thebquality has gone done cause the deadlines are toonshort
@@Burningwhisky96 Sometimes CGI can be really good though, like Pirates of the Caribbean's Davy Jones or MCU's Thanos.
Somehow they would ruin it with the most awful and most embarrassing cgi
Many nostalgic people prefer the old movie from 82, but I can't, I think the 2011 movie is much scarier and more real. Only sound of ancient creature is good, practical effects of it some have aged very badly.
Agreed. I prefer 82 but it's easy to tell what's a genuine criticism vs nostalgia when people don't even mention 82's flaws. I mean, the Blair monster was lame and a let down for a final creature.
@@marsha-madness-super-badnessIt's pretty clear that it's just nostalgia when people only mention the practical effects and nothing else, they completely ignore the acting and direction which were what really made the film so scary, the truth is they just want an excuse to criticize the new
"Flame is a judgement of the holy crusade to kill those creatures"
That last clip. Think that part was def my favorite of all in the 2011 remake, other than the helicopter scene
Prequel, not remake
I can’t stand people not liking the prequel. I think they compliment each other extremely well and it’s over the fact that a 2011 film is using cgi? It didn’t even use cgi for everything from what I saw in a behind the scenes on the film, they did indeed use practical effects for some shots. I just don’t see the argument over practical vs cgi effects, they are both equally as good and bad as each other.
Those practical special effects were 👌👌🤝.
I remember I watched the 1982 version in the theatre when I was just a teenager... The crowd was minimal and I was sitting alone at the back. I was seriously terrified and keep covering my eyes! 😂
I thought both movies were fine each with their own unique spins to it.
Don't let it get away
"The blood test" is the most frustrating scene. That repeated flamethrower fail
What I find interesting about the lore of the first film is that apparently when the thing arrived on earth it was most likely not a crew member but rather had killed whoever was inside, imagine the possibilities of theories, a race decimated by the thing and trying to escape ended up leading to the earth lol
This is what happens kids when you don't eat your vegetables.
No CGI dude is the best terrifying movie I've ever seen
💭💭I just love it when I get that pop up saying "Someone has liked your comment" or "Someone has subscribed!"😍 Make somebody's day better!😃😀"
Du xjdho
@@ballandoye9941 WHAT
Not even close. What Carpenter did back in 82 it’s nothing but a masterpiece…By far one of the greatest horror movies ever
The original is a master piece but Oml it can burn in hell😂 shit fr scarred me and to this day makes my stomach turn. Absolutely a masterpiece of a film man.
The fact that there was a remake proves they didn't understand why the original was so great.
The brilliance of the Thing is its ability to generate utter paranoia and confusion. The movie, like the Thing itself, is complex and unpredictable. It didn't seek to create a sense of danger with chase scenes, creative gore and jumpscares, but with an overarching feeling of unease and complete helplessness. The characters are trapped in the station with a constantly changing and shifting malicious entity that may be anywhere or anyone, they have no idea who it will attack, when, or how, and even at the end, they never know if it's still there. That alone makes it a truly terrifying movie, and the bizarrely horrifying practical effects lended to it perfectly.
The fact someone decided the story would be served by "updating" it with CGI graphics and including painfully boring Hollywood chase scenes and jumpscares is really an insult to John Carpenter's masterpiece.
This movie kicked ass!
Oh this is where the minecraft mod "From Another World" came from
I'd be curious to who would winner in 1 on 2 fight/battle, with The THING vs. the White Spikes (The Tomorrow War Film) and The Death Angels (A Quiet Place Films). The Commentators can be the Alien and Predator.
I'd probably go with the death angels. Fast af
@@rafayg7376 id say the Thin because as soon as you touch it it will begin to assimilate you and Death angels have a knack for impaling their victims as well
The thing would win
This is like the type of stuff I had in that one nightmare I had
Watch 100 times still remember this movie to reference game Among Us (2020)
I'm sold. I do need a flame thrower
I like how the alien can't imitate teeth but can produce massive fangs 💀
It can imitate teeth. It can't imitate metal fillings placed in teeth or any inorganic materials.
At 4:46 you can hear someone screaming. But it is obvious that no one is. It is added just for atmosphere, but it doesn't make sense. The characters start yelling and screaming afterwards
0:10 rip hes hands
i love how hes holding a bundle of dynamite with the fuse mere inches away from the end of the flamethrower!
At the beginning of the movie, the dog was shot 32 times with a telescopic sight and was not hit once!!!
Shot by a research assistant working in an antarctic cabin, and sitting in a helicopter a mile away. Not by some sniper in the army
The dog one has to be my favourite
I have one word why
The Old Is Gold. No matter how computers are developed. We all Miss the good old days having sooo much fun with a flame thrower ~~😢😢
Первый раз посмотрел этот шедевр в видеосалоне где-то в 87 году, когда был в спортлагере. Я был просто в шоке от крутизны этого фильма. Сейчас такое не снимают...
9:50 i will say, this scream evenly matches well with 1984’s scream from Bennings. God damn thats good
Love how they stare for a min then shoot..!!
Chapter 3 was more creepy than the other chapters 😮😅
I would like to see here a collection of the best moments from the exorcist
10:17 traumatized me as a kid, I was afraid to touch any other human for like two months after seeing it
2:25 when the imposter is sus
A lot of people hate the CGI but I like it. It’s still scary to look at to me. 🤷🏽♂️
The bit where Mcreedy and Doc check out Norwegian camp and Doc says my god what thee hells happened here and as they walk outside Doc says is that a man in there or something one of the greatest Movies 🎬 ever made
Love that the only reasonable response by everyone is to use a flamethrower
やはりクリーチャーはCGより実際に作った方のがリアリティがあるな！
82年でもこのクオリティは凄い！
I'm team CGI. A lot of people are hating CGI because it's the fashionable thing.
The 82' original was a groundbreaking classis with fantastic effects. The 2011 remake was I believe a prequel? And still a very good one at that! Don't know why so many people hate on it!?
Sorry this is such a long reply, I kinda went into a rant, but I feel I tried to at least somewhat explain my feelings on it. Yes the 2011 one is a prequel. And I agree, not a bad movie. It’s main issue stems from how most of what it does is derivative of the original and it’s effects are pretty lackluster. Most of the transformations and effects are done with CGI and just don’t hold up well. Specifically the guy on the helicopter whose face opens up and a bunch of twizzler lookin things fly out of his chest. Or the two guys that fuse together to become the thing they find at the beginning of the original movie. That creature known as “split-face” was originally going to be created with practical effects (which you can find test footage of on Amalgamated Dynamics RUclips channel) and looked damn good. However, Universal Studios didn’t think people would want to see practical effects, so they told Amalgamted Dynamics to replace it all with CG. So a lot of it looks rushed and just plain goofy. That whole scene at the end of the movie where Kate is exploring the ship and finds that “reactor core” thing made of tetris blocks just looks stupid, not to mention the weird worm thing that assimilated her boss and just had his face on it still even though it doesn’t need to hide at that point. Even that creature was supposed to look far different and more legitimately creepy, but again, they were forced to change it for Universal.
@@schawangusimo the sander thing in the spaceship looked cool but it looked goofy when it had sander’s face.
Many peoole hated the CGI, me included. The CGI didn't aged well contrast to the practical effects that the 1982 film used.
Cause they are boomers
@@shamsielshahar12082 effects were clumsy as hell lmao, it is really poor honestly, overrated and overgored
I haven't seen the OG The Thing but these clips show that the classic one also had these moments where a character just stares idiotically at the monster waiting to be killed is just so hilarious 😂
1982 : grotesque, weird, fright, courage, active.
- real horror.
2011 : ONLY scream and something like tentacle.
- rare horror
John Carpenter's The Thing will always have the best ending, and the most terrifying monster ever. To this day, it will never get old. Even 2011 Thing did good for its debut.
I still think sometimes the "spider-head" thing is under my bed...
Bruh
Let's be real. The graphics were fantastic for their respective years. 1982 for a classic and inventive way to show gore during the beginning and 2011 when CGI looked just as well when it was at its peak.
People fail to realise they all grown up an a movie that was good then will basically phase out, the thing back then was a masterpiece but how many of u can sit down a look at it like u did 20 yrs back cmon b real the visuals will look like shit say what u want its true
Yeah but they look cool
personally i like the 1982 version there is just a certain charm to it
i always thought that a part of the thing escaped from the root during the dog scene when it went through the roof
Yeah but if you look closely at the scene where Childs torches it you can actually see it fall down
I love the 1982 version but that fused two head creature walking about was creepy as anything in the prequel.
I would prefer the old one, but my fear just just being absorbed is even bigger than my fear of being stabbed or bitten
I feel like the 2011 one sucked because of the cgi and also because they used background music to make suspense, the original was already so creepy it didn't need background music, just raw sound to freak you out.
1982 is better, but this 2011 prequel is good. If you want read the original novel, it's "Who Goes There", John W. Campbell, 1938.
Spider bonce would’ve been funnier if it had been wearing 8 x miniature boots with a Cuban heel as it scuttled off out into the hallway !😅
Reminds me of some of the special gore effects on the horror movie "From Beyond" 😄
thx for the hint,gonna watch this now :)
@@knosel3704 From beyond is a cult classic. Check out The Re-Animater while you're at it.
One of my favourite bits of one of my favourite films , spider head 😂