39:50 Correction: Saif Ali Khan appointment 1. Nawab Ali Khan was 1st Governor: 1620 2. Humrat Khan 3. Nawab Asad Ullah Khan 4. Koch Quli Khan 5. Sayyid HussaIN Khan 6. Hasan bdullah Khan Pathan 7. Sayyid Khalil Ullah Khan 8. Nawab Saif Ali Khan was the last Governor: 1743
@@AyushSharma-ti7oe You are correct. The Battle of Nadaun does indeed have varying dates according to different historical sources: 1. Harbans Mukhia Notes the battle took place on March 7, 1691 2. Muhammad Qasim Firishta - Provides a range of years, 1690-1693, which reflects the uncertainty and variations in historical records. 3. John F. Richards Indicates that the battle occurred between 1691-1692 suggesting a broader timeframe rather than a specific date.. Regards still 1691-1692 are safe.
Thank you for the kind words! I’m just glad to be able to share information about Himachal Pradesh. Your support really encourages me to keep going. If you have any questions or need more info, feel free to ask! Regards 🙏🏽
12:51 i think arayn ne ye term di thi hiamchal k natuve civilains ko pls clarify bec malesch neech mane jaate hai .......and aryans were not neech wo jhud ko sresth mante the
Hello! Thank you for your engagement. You are absolutely correct. However, "Mleccha" has a layered history and has been interpreted in various ways across different periods. Example: 1. Scholars, like V. Gordon Childe and B. B. Lal, suggest that early Aryans were not a homogeneous group but included tribes with varying beliefs. In this context, some groups later labeled as "Mlecchas" had Aryan connections, especially the "Early Aryans". 2. H. C. Raychaudhuri highlights the complex interactions in Himachal, indicating that "Mleccha" encompasses a broader range of people, including those with Aryan roots in Himachal Pradesh as "Khasas". 3. Romila Thapar and others emphasize that "Mleccha" was a fluid term, often used to define the 'other,' reflecting changing cultural and social dynamics over time. 4. D.D. Kosambi - In his work "The Culture and Civilization of Ancient India in Historical Outline", also argues that the term "Mleccha" might have been applied to various groups, including some Aryan tribes, particularly those that were outside the mainstream Vedic fold "Khas Aryans." 5. Michel Danino - In his work "The Lost River: On the Trail of the Sarasvati" & Asko Parpola's "The Roots of Hinduism: The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization" also justifies the same. But other groups such as S. R. Rao & H. C. Raychaudhuri refuse this. I hope this clarifies my stance on this. Regards!
True. The Treaty of Sagauli had 3 key stages: it was first signed on November 28, 1815, at Sagauli between the British East India Company and Nepal at Sagauli Bihar. A supplementary agreement followed on December 2, 1815, in Kolkata to clarify terms. Finally, the treaty was ratified on March 4, 1816, also in Kolkata, making it officially binding.
Hello! Thank you for your engagement. You are absolutely correct. However, "Mleccha" has a layered history and has been interpreted in various ways across different periods. Example: 1. Scholars, like V. Gordon Childe and B. B. Lal, suggest that early Aryans were not a homogeneous group but included tribes with varying beliefs. In this context, some groups later labeled as "Mlecchas" had Aryan connections, especially the "Early Aryans". 2. H. C. Raychaudhuri highlights the complex interactions in Himachal, indicating that "Mleccha" encompasses a broader range of people, including those with Aryan roots in Himachal Pradesh as "Khasas". 3. Romila Thapar and others emphasize that "Mleccha" was a fluid term, often used to define the 'other,' reflecting changing cultural and social dynamics over time. 4. D.D. Kosambi - In his work "The Culture and Civilization of Ancient India in Historical Outline", also argues that the term "Mleccha" might have been applied to various groups, including some Aryan tribes, particularly those that were outside the mainstream Vedic fold "Khas Aryans." 5. Michel Danino - In his work "The Lost River: On the Trail of the Sarasvati" & Asko Parpola's "The Roots of Hinduism: The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization" also justifies the same. But other groups such as S. R. Rao & H. C. Raychaudhuri refuse this. I hope this clarifies my stance on this. Regards!
29:11 Masir-ul-Umara, of Khafi Khan mentions that news was brought to Jahangir by Mahabat Khan on 20 Nov, 1620. They entered the fort on 16 Nov, took 4 days to completely take hold of the fort and expel Hari Chand 2, Governor Ram Chand (brother) and Qiladar Khan Jha.
39:50 Correction: Saif Ali Khan appointment
1. Nawab Ali Khan was 1st Governor: 1620
2. Humrat Khan
3. Nawab Asad Ullah Khan
4. Koch Quli Khan
5. Sayyid HussaIN Khan
6. Hasan bdullah Khan Pathan
7. Sayyid Khalil Ullah Khan
8. Nawab Saif Ali Khan was the last Governor: 1743
Correction 15:57... I guess the year was 1690-92
@@AyushSharma-ti7oe You are correct. The Battle of Nadaun does indeed have varying dates according to different historical sources:
1. Harbans Mukhia Notes the battle took place on March 7, 1691
2. Muhammad Qasim Firishta - Provides a range of years, 1690-1693, which reflects the uncertainty and variations in historical records.
3. John F. Richards Indicates that the battle occurred between 1691-1692 suggesting a broader timeframe rather than a specific date..
Regards still 1691-1692 are safe.
@@abhinavverma2488 thanks sir.
too good sir
too goodc
Great session.. 🙌
When it comes to HP Gk no one can beat him. Best Teacher
Thank you for the kind words! I’m just glad to be able to share information about Himachal Pradesh. Your support really encourages me to keep going. If you have any questions or need more info, feel free to ask! Regards 🙏🏽
@@abhinavverma2488impressive sir
36:04 bhaga vajeerrrr
हर कोई acadmy hindi medium ke students ko दरकिनार कर रही है।।
12:51 i think arayn ne ye term di thi hiamchal k natuve civilains ko pls clarify bec malesch neech mane jaate hai .......and aryans were not neech wo jhud ko sresth mante the
Hello! Thank you for your engagement. You are absolutely correct.
However, "Mleccha" has a layered history and has been interpreted in various ways across different periods. Example:
1. Scholars, like V. Gordon Childe and B. B. Lal, suggest that early Aryans were not a homogeneous group but included tribes with varying beliefs. In this context, some groups later labeled as "Mlecchas" had Aryan connections, especially the "Early Aryans".
2. H. C. Raychaudhuri highlights the complex interactions in Himachal, indicating that "Mleccha" encompasses a broader range of people, including those with Aryan roots in Himachal Pradesh as "Khasas".
3. Romila Thapar and others emphasize that "Mleccha" was a fluid term, often used to define the 'other,' reflecting changing cultural and social dynamics over time.
4. D.D. Kosambi - In his work "The Culture and Civilization of Ancient India in Historical Outline", also argues that the term "Mleccha" might have been applied to various groups, including some Aryan tribes, particularly those that were outside the mainstream Vedic fold "Khas Aryans."
5. Michel Danino - In his work "The Lost River: On the Trail of the Sarasvati" & Asko Parpola's "The Roots of Hinduism: The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization" also justifies the same.
But other groups such as S. R. Rao & H. C. Raychaudhuri refuse this.
I hope this clarifies my stance on this. Regards!
Traety of Segauli -- 2 December 1815
Ratified - 4 March 1816
True. The Treaty of Sagauli had 3 key stages: it was first signed on November 28, 1815, at Sagauli between the British East India Company and Nepal at Sagauli Bihar. A supplementary agreement followed on December 2, 1815, in Kolkata to clarify terms. Finally, the treaty was ratified on March 4, 1816, also in Kolkata, making it officially binding.
Mlehchas does not mean aryans ,it means people who does not believe in Vedic practices
Hello! Thank you for your engagement. You are absolutely correct.
However, "Mleccha" has a layered history and has been interpreted in various ways across different periods. Example:
1. Scholars, like V. Gordon Childe and B. B. Lal, suggest that early Aryans were not a homogeneous group but included tribes with varying beliefs. In this context, some groups later labeled as "Mlecchas" had Aryan connections, especially the "Early Aryans".
2. H. C. Raychaudhuri highlights the complex interactions in Himachal, indicating that "Mleccha" encompasses a broader range of people, including those with Aryan roots in Himachal Pradesh as "Khasas".
3. Romila Thapar and others emphasize that "Mleccha" was a fluid term, often used to define the 'other,' reflecting changing cultural and social dynamics over time.
4. D.D. Kosambi - In his work "The Culture and Civilization of Ancient India in Historical Outline", also argues that the term "Mleccha" might have been applied to various groups, including some Aryan tribes, particularly those that were outside the mainstream Vedic fold "Khas Aryans."
5. Michel Danino - In his work "The Lost River: On the Trail of the Sarasvati" & Asko Parpola's "The Roots of Hinduism: The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization" also justifies the same.
But other groups such as S. R. Rao & H. C. Raychaudhuri refuse this.
I hope this clarifies my stance on this. Regards!
Very helpful session Thankyou so much sir ❤😊
Thank you sir….
Wazir bhaga of chamba negotiated in 1848 to grant sanad to chamba
Great knowledge sir
Sir nawab ali khan first governor tha. It was saif ali khan in 1743
Saif Ali khan was tha last killadar of kangra fort
Thanks. You are right. Just forgot while Looking at the options. Though have pinned the correct Information. Regards.
Seize of Kangra fort-16 nov ,1620
Jahangir was informed by 20 nov ,1620 ?
29:11 Masir-ul-Umara, of Khafi Khan mentions that news was brought to Jahangir by Mahabat Khan on 20 Nov, 1620.
They entered the fort on 16 Nov, took 4 days to completely take hold of the fort and expel Hari Chand 2, Governor Ram Chand (brother) and Qiladar Khan Jha.
too good
❤