@akaerik1 honestly I can't split them. This is great as its a good Marshall in a box with a boost, the eq is flexible and sounds massive with humbuckers, and the boost is useful as it can be used on its own without engaging the distortion side. The solo is an unrefined sledgehammer. It is very dark so can get woofy with humbuckers, but with singles it sounds great. I'll say this. If you want a tight, compact, agressive tone get this. If you want thick and warm and do more chord based stuff instead of lead, get the solo.
100%. Most pedal manufacturers clone, or at least gain direct inspiration from something in the past, but I agree that the blatant copy of the trade dress is pretty wild.
which did you like better this or the solo
@akaerik1 honestly I can't split them. This is great as its a good Marshall in a box with a boost, the eq is flexible and sounds massive with humbuckers, and the boost is useful as it can be used on its own without engaging the distortion side.
The solo is an unrefined sledgehammer. It is very dark so can get woofy with humbuckers, but with singles it sounds great.
I'll say this. If you want a tight, compact, agressive tone get this. If you want thick and warm and do more chord based stuff instead of lead, get the solo.
These seems like it should be against the law. It’s such a blatant rip off
100%. Most pedal manufacturers clone, or at least gain direct inspiration from something in the past, but I agree that the blatant copy of the trade dress is pretty wild.
How ironic that a company that made its name from directly ripping off other companies designs now has to suffer the same fate