Thank you! I didnt know sone of the vocabular. Thank you! If i may have a suggestion for a longer version of this or a series of shorts with reading the positions of the pieces on the board - that maybe useful for viewers with visual impairment
It looks like the OP missed a Tactic. The Tactic known as “The Positional Exchange Sacrifice” It involves a higher valued piece such as a Rook trading itself off intentionally for a lower valued piece such as Bishop or Knight. Rook is worth 5 points in value. Bishop/Knight is worth 3 points in value. It isn’t normal for a player to give up a 5 point piece for a 3 point piece. The only time a person would do such a trade off would be if they are doing a check mating attack vs. enemy King. This is what makes the Positional Exchange Sacrifice special because it often is done for none check mating reasons. The reasons are more Positional and Long term in nature.
@@POSITIVE-ko7cq if you fork 2 pieces that are both defended and of the same value as the piece that's forking them you don't win anything it's just an equal trade
3:12
½:❌.
#️⃣:✔.
Thank you! I didnt know sone of the vocabular. Thank you! If i may have a suggestion for a longer version of this or a series of shorts with reading the positions of the pieces on the board - that maybe useful for viewers with visual impairment
what is this weird thumbnail trend of coloured circle icon thingys explanation videos
im seeing it everywhere
Dystopian lore
Everyone's copying the paint explainer
Skewer does not force the attacked piece to move. It reversed pin, you move attacked piece from danger but you lose something less valuable behind.
3:12 isnt it mate?
Yeah it is, this video just had no idea what they were talking about
It looks like the OP missed a Tactic.
The Tactic known as “The Positional Exchange Sacrifice”
It involves a higher valued piece such as a Rook trading itself off intentionally for a lower valued piece such as Bishop or Knight.
Rook is worth 5 points in value.
Bishop/Knight is worth 3 points in value.
It isn’t normal for a player to give up a 5 point piece for a 3 point piece.
The only time a person would do such a trade off would be if they are doing a check mating attack vs. enemy King.
This is what makes the Positional Exchange Sacrifice special because it often is done for none check mating reasons.
The reasons are more Positional and Long term in nature.
3:01 I do that sometimes
I always recommend my friends to this channel best content in all of chess.
Volclus can you write more songs with chess metaphors
Awesome vid
I looked at underpromotion, and I said, "Why is it a draw?"
Justice for decoy
3:12 huh?
Where is Bongcloud?
Thats an opening
Newgen thats an opening
That’s an opening
You already that video of tactics but it’s with different way.😮
Thank you
Bruh the thumbnail at battery and windmill 💀
is the format inspired by that video explanation christian denominations
Hate to be that guy but you copied the thumbnail design from a channel called Paint Guy
Also hate to be that guy, but paint also copied the thumbnail design from redeemed zoomer
I am starting to think that you’re copying Chess Thugs.😅
But Chess Thugs makes his videos in a fun way.😁
This channel was created way before chess thugs
This channel was made 2 years ago chess thugs was 4 months ago..
Chess thugs has too many offensive jokes yours doesn’t have
This is not every tactic
then whats missing?
it's a fork regardless of whether the pieces can be defended or not 🙄
no lol, if you “fork” two pieces but one of them is defended, it is simply not a fork and you dont win any material.
@@jumpplay5384 well forks don't necessarily win you material 🙄
@@prpltthey do- it’s literally why you do them
@@prpltdumbass
@@POSITIVE-ko7cq if you fork 2 pieces that are both defended and of the same value as the piece that's forking them you don't win anything it's just an equal trade
Second lol
1st lol
Can you do a nimzo indian guide?