Michael Jordan Highlights vs 76ers (1992.01.14) - 26pts, Having Fun with Sir Charles!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
- Boxscore: www.basketball...
-----
Highlights of the Game:
Coming soon~
-----
Support the Channel:
/ mj23haf
-----
Which game do you want me to do next? Feel free to make requests in the comment session.
Like, Comment, Share and Subscribe for more!!!
-----
NBA Highlights Top Plays Regular season Playoffs 90s Retro NBAVault Throwback GOAT Greatest Games Hardwood classics Bulls Lakers Trail Blazers Suns Sonics Jazz Knicks Cavaliers Warriors Hornets Bucks Heat Hawks Clippers Celtics Raptors Magic Pacers Nets Rockets Timberwolves Nuggets Pistons Kings Grizzlies Mavericks Spurs 76ers Sixers Wizards NBATV HD 720p RUclips Official Channel Dunks Jumpshots Michael Jordan Top 50 All Time Plays Michael Jordan Top 10 Plays of Career Michael Jordan - The Greatest Ever. マイケル・ジョーダン 마이클 조던 통계 喬丹 佐敦
The first 3peat Bulls always played defense like it was Game 7 in the Finals. Just a phenomenal defensive team...
The defense is insane!!!
This team fed off of Jordan and Pippen's defensive energy and MJ's unparalleled offensive flair.
nice work..... too bad no replays on the dunks.... keep the 91-92 games coming.....the Carmine 6's look great in the air
best ever
Thank you, this game is very rare.
3:13 look at the bench hahahhha
Barkley was so done in Philly by 92. He was like Ewing is having success Jordan is at his best, even Birds old ass is going to the playoffs in Boston, Brad Daugherty and Mark Price, really! Where the fuck is my team?
Sore Charles in 92.
More sore than 🦅 that’s for sure
No wonder Charles wanted to leave Philly. The Sixers were TURRIBLE.
Alecsander Hamilton
Michaels 92 season was easily his most effortless season.
In other words, MJ was the best MJ in 1992 and not 1991.
Also Pippen was best Pippen in 1992 which made MJ’s job even easier. The Bulls were stronger in 1996 and 1997 than 1992 , regardless of what Ainge or anyone else thinks, the 1996 and 1997 Bulls were stronger than the 1992 Bulls, but MJ and Pippen, Grant and even Rodman had he been a Bull in 1992, were all the best versions of themselves. It’s just Rodman Pippen Jordan Kukoc is > Grant Pippen Jordan Cartwright. So sorry. But back to the message...
- 67-15 his best regular season record yet
- He averaged I believe 30.1 points which was his third lowest after shortened second season and rookie season but his team still won the most games
- Pippen was officially prime
- Jordan was in his athletic prime, physical prime and though 96 was effortless and 97 very close as well, Jordan could score 30.1 on over 50% still exhausting himself less, taking more jumpers than before 1992 but also being able to physically get to the rim more efficiently than Jordan in 1996 or 1997 where I believe he averaged 30.4 and 29.7 respectively, which puts 1992 between those two season in PPG but he also did it more smoothly and efficiently, he wasn’t over 50% again after 93 I’d guess off my head right now.
Now the playoffs were a different story, the Knicks hit em square in the nose in game 1 and their season really began.
The 92 playoffs were Chicago’s toughest.
They lost 7 games after the first round, went 7 with New York and their dynasty was almost derailed as unexpectedly and faster than it even started.
The Cavs and Blazers went 6 each with Chicago and were tied 2-2 both series.
But MJs regular season was MJ and Chicago’s apex of the 88-94 era, he could do less, at his best and Chicago would do the rest.
They won a championship in Chicago Stadium, they went back to back, they survived New York’s surprise attack, and distinguished the last two “teams of the 90’s in CLE and POR.
Examples of this effortless ability from MJ and Chicago were the Game 7 vs NY when they won 110-81 in a sudden death situation.
Game 1 vs Portland when they won by the second half of a finals game and MJ went for 35 points in the first half, hit six threes at an automatic clip, but could finish with 39 points and call it a day instead of going for another 60 + like the days prior to 1991 when Michael’s efforts weren’t a guaranteed win much less a blowout.
And Game 6 vs Portland when Jordan could sit on the bench start of the 4th Qtr and let Pippen and the benchman erase a 15 point deficit to steal a second title going away. The Bulls and MJ were their most explosive prior to 1996 and 1997 when they took what 92 did and made it a normality.
1993 they did not have this same energy and swagger until 60-70 games into the season and in the playoffs when they again showed that surging raging Bull ability. Again New York took sails out of Chicago’s stampede but after returning home Chicago wrapped up 4 straight and then put Phoenix in a chokehold off jump and merely lost two games due to Phoenix’s explosability but only in desperation and not in rhythm.
@@whatitdobaby2382 Ainge believes 92 Bulls were stronger than 96 or 97 Bulls but I disagree. The 96 and 97 Bulls were so tall, long, quick, strong, and mature. Rodman in 96 and 97 is better than 88-94 Grant. Pippen was still in peak in 96 and 97 and a better shooter and leader having gained in both areas after Jordan left. Jordan was arguably at his best though I think first three peat Michael was more his Airness and at his best in terms of age, experience, athleticism and so on. But MJ in 96 and 97 is just a more technique driven, strong bodied veteran with more championship aura and really struck fear in the league from 96-98. Partly due to his competition being made more aware of his dominance and much competition being younger and less well equipped to challenge Jordan.
Longley was massive body for Chicago. Harper was a 6'6" guard / forward playing point. Kukoc is a better third scorer and playmaker than anyone in that role from 88-94. Caffey was tough. Kerr was lights out. Randy Brown was a work horse small defender. I just don't think Ainge respects the late 90's as much as his own era which doesn't make him unique from basketball analysts. But I just think if the 96 Bulls plays the 93 Suns or 92 Blazers or 86 Celtics. They'd have been tougher for Ainge's teams than the 92 Bulls.
Especially considering let's take the 96 Bulls roster and slap them in 86 vs Boston. In 92 and 93 vs the Suns... And you'd have a 20 pt Russell Westbrook like Ron Harper. A Croatian Sensation Kukoc. A young doberman in Pippen. A 63 point Air Jordan or 6 3pts in one half Air Jordan or 3 peat Jordan. You'd have a young Rodman or 2x defensive player of year SF PF Rodman who looked to score more. He was more traditionalluly balanced a player before he really came into his own style by San Antonio and Chicago. The 86 Bulls would be extremely young and less mature than the 86 Celtics. But that talent and knowing how the college stars have been known to give NBA all-stars a run for their money. I'd be stupid to say those Baby Bulls have no chance.
Ainge basically fits the "when I was at my best I played the best there was" bias. I think 96 Bulls were more daunting and intimidating and unbeatable than the 92 Bulls.
@@whatitdobaby2382 well, they both had shirt primes and were lesser players than plenty guys of their era.. so I would say Harper and Price do not absolutely deserve the HOF. But they were awesome and those Cleveland teams were amazing. When healthy and fully rostered they had ultimate potential. But they too, just got cut down by misfortune. But the 92 Cavs, 93 Cavs could have really used a Ron Harper. Daugherty and Price were special, Nance and Williams tall and skilled, Ehlo or Wilkins were decent. Mike Sanders, Terrell Brandon were good to special in Brandon's case. Kerr.. the 94 Cavs were still very strong, but Daugherty was out for all playoffs and eventually retired after 8 seasons before 94-95. So he was cut down. Mark Price missed valuable seasons in the early 90's that wasted seasons for Cleveland..and Harper was traded by 88-89. Which was stupid.. they were very good teams that could have would have been great if all those missteps didn't occur.