It's well known that many people were rescued from the 1883 Krakatoa eruption in an A310. How that plane was in service for well over a century is just absolutely amazing.
Especially since the only jet fuel back then was produced by Tibetan monks feeding kerosene to yaks. The byproduct was pure, but difficult to get down the mountain. And the yaks were not happy.
Is this AI created? KLM is not an airline only focused on long haul, they fly a lot of long haul but also has an extensive short and medium haul network, which makes their Amsterdam hub work. They have more than 100 narrowbody aircraft in service, including KLM Cityhopper. Their ATRs flew both both KLM Excel and KLM UK, subsidiaries that operated out of Eindhoven/Maastricht and within plus out of the UK.
As a child in the Sixties in Manila, the very first jetliner I travelled in was a Thai Airways Caravelle from Hong Kong to Manila in 1966. The trip to Hong Kong was in Philippine Airlines Vickers Viscount turboprop. Later I flew in a Philippine Airlines BAC-11 from Manila to Davao and a Cathay Pacific Electra turboprop to Hong Kong from Manila - later on their Convair 660s. Interisland flights were and are still a bif thing in the Philippines. So In my childhood, I got aound in DC-3s, Hawker-Siddley turboporps, Fokker Fairchilds and YS 11 turboprops of Philippine airlines and the long defuct Air Manila. There were so many different makes of airplane in those days. Today it's basically only Boeing and Airbus. But I'll never forget my firt flight in 1966 to Hong Kong and back, first in the PAL Vickers Viscount and in the Thai Airways Caravelle. The Caravelle was the more luxurious craft. I loved the triangular windows and debarking on the rear ramp! Oh yes, and I loved watching the Qantas Constellations which plied the Manila-Australia route in the early 60s.
The IL62 Engines are on the tail not on the wing as stated. The only reason JAL used these planes as with Russian pilots they could overfly the Soviet a union on the way to Europe avoiding the long flight via Alaska. As such they were Soviet planes operated by Soviet pilots.
Not sure why this is qualified as excuse. Airlines had the option to add many hours going via Anchorage Alaska or get in a deal with the Soviet Union to lease a plane with pilots from Aeroflot (and yes you can get your titles painted on) and fly with a stop in Moscow. Jal for a period choose that.
Yep, another Clickbait video that lured me in with a doctored thumbnail photo (Air France L1011), when will I ever learn…? Scrolled through the entire video, no AF L1011…Duped once again…😡
No it's not. Call up their corporate headquarters in Montreal, and tell me how they answer the phone...It is, and always has been bom-bar-dee-AY, from all the way back when they made snowmobiles. Trust me, I speak French, and have family in Quebec. You are an ignoramus.
I agree with most of the comments on here that the information put forward is incorrect…..including the fact that the cockpit and front section was used under license from de Havilland and was first used on the Comet
And the C-17 isn't of Qatar AIrways it is owned by the Qatar Military but is in a Qatar Civilian scheme to facilitate access to areas where a Mil aircraft isn't so happily seen.
Everyone's so concerned about the A310 being made in 1883, they didn't notice that the Icelandair's DC3 was flown domestically, in Iceland. Or that Qatar Airways C17 simultaneously flew Mach 0.79 which is equivalent to Mack 0.79. 10:00 It's true! 😆
1883? I'm sure that, when Robert Louis Stevenson published Treasure Island that year, he was thrilled about the thought of his first flight on an A310.
Ok il62 the engines are on the tail of the body. Not on the wings. 2 engines in 1 pod per side...hahaha ok this person needs to research a little more on these planes. Also it was not a wide body design it was a narrow body with a single aisle. The range is about accurate.
Some remarks, if I may: 3:14: the SE210 Caravelle was indeed designed by SNCASE which was a part of the rebuilt aircraft manufacturing following WWII. SE means South-East. There was also SNCASO standing for South-West: the names of the companies being then related to their geographical location. SNCASE never produced any military aircrafts: just some fighter prototypes without success. In 1948 they produced a 4 engines airliner, the SE.2010 Armagnac which, to my knowledge, has never been exported. SNCASO manufactured some transport aircafts, one prototype rocket plane (the SO.9000 Trident in 1953 which reached Mach 1.92), the helicopter SO.1221 Djinn (gas ejection from the blade tips and no tail rotor) some of which entered service in the Army Aviation in Algeria and the twin jet engine bomber SO.4050 Vautour (Vulture) which has been used by the French and Israeli Air Forces. SNCASE and SNCASO merged later on to become Sud-Aviation (South-Aviation). In parallell existed Nord-Aviation (most famous aircrafts being the Nord 2501 Noratlas, Nord262 civilian twin engine transport airplane and the C160 Transall in coorperation with Germany. In 1970 Sud-Aviation and Nord-Aviation merged and became Aérospatiale (producing Concorde) with 3 divisions: airplanes, helicopters and missiles. The airplane division, located in Toulouse, became a big part of ... Airbus 3:19: this aircraft (3 engines) has nothing to do with SNCASE (created after WWII) since it's most likely a Dewoitine D332 (pre-war manufacturer), an airplane from the early 30's. 3:22: the aircraft shown is not a French military aircraft but a British Bristol Brabazon which flew in 1949 to be a transatlantic airliner but was eventually a commercial failure. 3:53: you mention wing spoiler but you show the horizontal stabilizer ... Btw, all Caravelles had wing spoilers from the begining. 4:43: this is not a "T-Tail". For T-tails refer to the DC9 for example. Anyway T-tails have nothing to do with reducing drag: they are related to the efficiency of the stabilizer with regard to the airflow. A lot of mistakes ...
The two Il-62 aircraft never belonged to Japan Airlines, but to the Soviet airline Aeroflot. The two aircraft were used by Aeroflot in co-operation with Japan Airlines on routes between Japan and Moscow. This is why the aircraft were painted in the standard Aeroflot livery and only had small Japan Airlines stickers on the front of the fuselage. The two airlines had already done something similar before with a Tupolev Tu-114. My God, this video is so poorly researched and so full of mistakes. Lufthansa never owned a Citation X either. The image shown comes from a forum for the X-Plane flight simulator and is explicitly labelled as fictional.
>planes you didnt know were owned by airlines >C-17 that is owned by Qatari Air Force The IL-62 isn't a wide body airliner, JAL never bought the the IL-62, the Aeroflot operated it in conjunction with Japan Airlines to fly routes to fly JAL's Moscow services in the 60's, they were definitely not flying them as late as 1988 as by that point JAL had long been flying its own DC-8's. The vast majority of aircraft mentioned in this video were leases, airlines did not own them.
Why no BAC 1-11's? No F-100's? Both operated by USAir(aka US Airways, now American), who was the launch customer for the Fokker. They also operated the F-28, by the way. This list is disappointing.
@@jeffssaundersThe F-28's were originally Piedmont. The BAC 1-11's were originally Empire Airlines. USAir was originally named Allegheny Airlines, and it acquired those two carriers along with several others. The F-100 was USAir's own launch.
Boy, you are just a goof with your pictures and narration; for example, all glass cockpit doesn't refer to the aircraft's windscreens. Your mistakes are galore.
Aaaah the A310. The mainstay of the Boer War and Boxer Rebellion. Airbus really did a good job of getting in the air before that pesky Wright Brothers.
Some info is not correct…KLM EXEL stopped operating in 2005 so the ATR’s in the video were already retired in 2007 and the IL-62 was never owned by JAL but wetleased from Aeroflot to be able to fljy over theSovjet Union on the Tokio - Moscow route. KLM did the same since this was a faster route than flying via Anchorage.
North Korea's only airline Air Koryo, has 2 IL-62M aircraft It operates as VIP transport for government use. The IL-62 was similar to the British Vickers VC10 aircraft that were flown by several airlines and air forces worldwide. The BAE ATP was developed from the existing Hawker Siddeley HS 748.
Wait, what? 1883? So the Wright brothers were just kidding. They were attempting to fly 20 feet while Airbus was crossing oceans. Emirates later bought A310 that was almost 100 years old? Hallelujah.
![ROSÉ(로제) - APT. (Band VER.) (With. 이영지) [더 시즌즈-이영지의 레인보우] | KBS 241129 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IW8qaemx74g/mqdefault.jpg)
The a310 was NOT produced in 1883
But if it was, imagine retiring the a310 for the Wright flyer💀
Is this video made with ai or something 💀
@@Paper246 most likely
@@Paper246 nope. Lol but proofreading editing before publishing is good
Correct😂😂😂
I had no idea that the Airbus A310 was in production 20 years before the Wright brothers invented the first airplane!
@5:09 "As of 2024, there are no Caravelle aircraft in operation by United Airlines." No kidding 😲😳
Unbelievable
@@galadato7425 🤣🤣🤣
1883 until 1997 with 114 years of service the A310 has got to be the most successful airliner so far.
Lol.
It's well known that many people were rescued from the 1883 Krakatoa eruption in an A310. How that plane was in service for well over a century is just absolutely amazing.
Especially since the only jet fuel back then was produced by Tibetan monks feeding kerosene to yaks. The byproduct was pure, but difficult to get down the mountain. And the yaks were not happy.
1883 love it. That this was not spotted.
The guy even said it. He should’ve really checked his research before he said it.
@@VeshremyEnjoyer Probably an AI voice...
Yeah bro don’t you know your aviation history? Where did the Wright brothers get the idea from?
Why is the information in this video so bad ? A310 from 1883 , IL62 was a wide body ? Do better !
IL62 engine location as well....
now you know it's AI generated.
ahh yes, the a310 was definitely made in 1883.
Me who's from 1883 , I can confirm it's true 👌
Is this AI created? KLM is not an airline only focused on long haul, they fly a lot of long haul but also has an extensive short and medium haul network, which makes their Amsterdam hub work. They have more than 100 narrowbody aircraft in service, including KLM Cityhopper.
Their ATRs flew both both KLM Excel and KLM UK, subsidiaries that operated out of Eindhoven/Maastricht and within plus out of the UK.
You should fire your script writer and whoever does the final approval for these videos. So much wrong info.
Most likely chatgpt
Bro what are these NPC channels lately with AI voices and missinfomation
a A310 WIDEBODY with JET ENGINES in 1883???? Lmfao
AI garbage
1983, not 1883.
(1983 was when the A310 was first produced)
As a child in the Sixties in Manila, the very first jetliner I travelled in was a Thai Airways Caravelle from Hong Kong to Manila in 1966. The trip to Hong Kong was in Philippine Airlines Vickers Viscount turboprop. Later I flew in a Philippine Airlines BAC-11 from Manila to Davao and a Cathay Pacific Electra turboprop to Hong Kong from Manila - later on their Convair 660s. Interisland flights were and are still a bif thing in the Philippines. So In my childhood, I got aound in DC-3s, Hawker-Siddley turboporps, Fokker Fairchilds and YS 11 turboprops of Philippine airlines and the long defuct Air Manila. There were so many different makes of airplane in those days. Today it's basically only Boeing and Airbus. But I'll never forget my firt flight in 1966 to Hong Kong and back, first in the PAL Vickers Viscount and in the Thai Airways Caravelle. The Caravelle was the more luxurious craft. I loved the triangular windows and debarking on the rear ramp! Oh yes, and I loved watching the Qantas Constellations which plied the Manila-Australia route in the early 60s.
The IL-62 isnt a wide body airliner, it is also a narrow body airliner such as the British V.C.-10.
And the wing mount engines sure looked like a strange mounting. Almost like they were mounted on the empennage............
The Caravelle is not a T tail
Technichly it is. Commonmly refered to as " inverted cruciform T" aka, " Low T".
@@Southwest_923WR I would call it a mid-tail.
I would call that a + tail.
The first aircraft with a true T tail was the Hawker Siddeley Trident (9th January 1962)
Not bad for a jet built in 1883. Im quite impressed with its modern look , i must say myself . Talk about being ahead of the curve.
Jesus, I didn’t know Lear was owned by bombardier, I hang my head in shame 😢
It is not a separate company
Ah yes...1883
@3:53. Those aren't spoilers.
If I’m correct, that’s the horizontal stabilizers.
Ah yes the A310 Queen Victorias jet of choice when visiting far away lands back in 1883
The IL62 Engines are on the tail not on the wing as stated. The only reason JAL used these planes as with Russian pilots they could overfly the Soviet a union on the way to Europe avoiding the long flight via Alaska. As such they were Soviet planes operated by Soviet pilots.
That excuse makes no sense
Not sure why this is qualified as excuse. Airlines had the option to add many hours going via Anchorage Alaska or get in a deal with the Soviet Union to lease a plane with pilots from Aeroflot (and yes you can get your titles painted on) and fly with a stop in Moscow. Jal for a period choose that.
Yep, another Clickbait video that lured me in with a doctored thumbnail photo (Air France L1011), when will I ever learn…? Scrolled through the entire video, no AF L1011…Duped once again…😡
Same here!
Air France very briefly flew 2 Tristars in 1989 or 1990, I'm not sure.
If I recall correctly they were some kind of wet lease (with crews).
@@KyrilPGLeased from Air Transat
Probably with the Classic Eurowhite livery.
A310 in 1883😂😂😂
0:27: Bombardier: bom-bar-dee-AY.
Seriously is it that important?
it is literally bomb-ar-der
Yawn....
No it's not. Call up their corporate headquarters in Montreal, and tell me how they answer the phone...It is, and always has been bom-bar-dee-AY, from all the way back when they made snowmobiles. Trust me, I speak French, and have family in Quebec. You are an ignoramus.
@@michaeldunham3385 Is it that hard to say correctly?
I agree with most of the comments on here that the information put forward is incorrect…..including the fact that the cockpit and front section was used under license from de Havilland and was first used on the Comet
And the C-17 isn't of Qatar AIrways it is owned by the Qatar Military but is in a Qatar Civilian scheme to facilitate access to areas where a Mil aircraft isn't so happily seen.
Everyone's so concerned about the A310 being made in 1883, they didn't notice that the Icelandair's DC3 was flown domestically, in Iceland. Or that Qatar Airways C17 simultaneously flew Mach 0.79 which is equivalent to Mack 0.79. 10:00 It's true! 😆
you left out the BAC 111. One thing I learned here is that jet aircraft were made in 1883!
The United Airlines Caravelle was an elegant looking airplane. It must've been nice to fly on one of these beauties around the US.
I was hoping to be the first to mention 1883! That was just o er 100 years after they secured the airports in the American Revolution
Those are the airports where the invisible aircraft land, aren't they?🤣
Singapore Airways had Learjet 45's too
1883? I'm sure that, when Robert Louis Stevenson published Treasure Island that year, he was thrilled about the thought of his first flight on an A310.
There are literally too many errors in this video to list.
THE A310 WAS MADE IN 1983 !
do better robot
IL 62 was not a wide-body plane, nor are its engines mounted on the wings. Next time do your research.
Ok il62 the engines are on the tail of the body. Not on the wings. 2 engines in 1 pod per side...hahaha ok this person needs to research a little more on these planes. Also it was not a wide body design it was a narrow body with a single aisle. The range is about accurate.
Some remarks, if I may:
3:14: the SE210 Caravelle was indeed designed by SNCASE which was a part of the rebuilt aircraft manufacturing following WWII. SE means South-East. There was also SNCASO standing for South-West: the names of the companies being then related to their geographical location. SNCASE never produced any military aircrafts: just some fighter prototypes without success. In 1948 they produced a 4 engines airliner, the SE.2010 Armagnac which, to my knowledge, has never been exported.
SNCASO manufactured some transport aircafts, one prototype rocket plane (the SO.9000 Trident in 1953 which reached Mach 1.92), the helicopter SO.1221 Djinn (gas ejection from the blade tips and no tail rotor) some of which entered service in the Army Aviation in Algeria and the twin jet engine bomber SO.4050 Vautour (Vulture) which has been used by the French and Israeli Air Forces.
SNCASE and SNCASO merged later on to become Sud-Aviation (South-Aviation). In parallell existed Nord-Aviation (most famous aircrafts being the Nord 2501 Noratlas, Nord262 civilian twin engine transport airplane and the C160 Transall in coorperation with Germany. In 1970 Sud-Aviation and Nord-Aviation merged and became Aérospatiale (producing Concorde) with 3 divisions: airplanes, helicopters and missiles. The airplane division, located in Toulouse, became a big part of ... Airbus
3:19: this aircraft (3 engines) has nothing to do with SNCASE (created after WWII) since it's most likely a Dewoitine D332 (pre-war manufacturer), an airplane from the early 30's.
3:22: the aircraft shown is not a French military aircraft but a British Bristol Brabazon which flew in 1949 to be a transatlantic airliner but was eventually a commercial failure.
3:53: you mention wing spoiler but you show the horizontal stabilizer ... Btw, all Caravelles had wing spoilers from the begining.
4:43: this is not a "T-Tail". For T-tails refer to the DC9 for example. Anyway T-tails have nothing to do with reducing drag: they are related to the efficiency of the stabilizer with regard to the airflow.
A lot of mistakes ...
Wojow A310 produced in 1883, 20 years after slavery was finally abandoned! A pitty sales only picked up about a century later
When i think of emirates I think of A380
The two Il-62 aircraft never belonged to Japan Airlines, but to the Soviet airline Aeroflot. The two aircraft were used by Aeroflot in co-operation with Japan Airlines on routes between Japan and Moscow. This is why the aircraft were painted in the standard Aeroflot livery and only had small Japan Airlines stickers on the front of the fuselage. The two airlines had already done something similar before with a Tupolev Tu-114.
My God, this video is so poorly researched and so full of mistakes. Lufthansa never owned a Citation X either. The image shown comes from a forum for the X-Plane flight simulator and is explicitly labelled as fictional.
It was the other way around with the livery
This guy has no idea of what a wet lease is, though I am sure he knows what the dream is like.
Don’t watch this video because it’s full of inaccuracies and wrong information.
Hands down the funniest aviation video anywhere! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The LH Citation are used exclusively on training.
I couldn't be so bored.
New luggage compartment door 😂😂 rear air stairs 🤣
This video should have included the C-130 Hercules cargo planes that had been operated by Delta and Alaska Airlines.
And Pacific Western Airlines.
I remember taking a Swissair Caravelle from London to Bale/Basle in 1962.
>planes you didnt know were owned by airlines
>C-17 that is owned by Qatari Air Force
The IL-62 isn't a wide body airliner, JAL never bought the the IL-62, the Aeroflot operated it in conjunction with Japan Airlines to fly routes to fly JAL's Moscow services in the 60's, they were definitely not flying them as late as 1988 as by that point JAL had long been flying its own DC-8's.
The vast majority of aircraft mentioned in this video were leases, airlines did not own them.
1883? Really? This is why videos should be fact checked and editited before being rolled out
Otto von Bismark had a private a310
A video is pretty bad when 98% of its commenters seem to know more than the people creating the video.
bruh, emirates a310. I KNOW-
Why no BAC 1-11's? No F-100's? Both operated by USAir(aka US Airways, now American), who was the launch customer for the Fokker. They also operated the F-28, by the way. This list is disappointing.
Originally Piedmont.
@@jeffssaundersThe F-28's were originally Piedmont. The BAC 1-11's were originally Empire Airlines. USAir was originally named Allegheny Airlines, and it acquired those two carriers along with several others. The F-100 was USAir's own launch.
Airbus was so ahead of the game. Developing jet powered aircraft in 1883!
Some flying today feel that old.
6:45 1983 it's probly weekday he was trying to say. 10:30 that's a Fokker F-50 hhhhh to many errors
That's a F-100 17:16
Man those A310s can just keep flying and flying even after 100 years 😂
Proof watch and listen to the words…credibility
I knew about all of these!
... "You did'nt know.."... Thanks for informing me... I thought I did know (about) (at least) the one I flew...
the first a310 was produced in 1883? wow, it’s super old then!
Wow, 1883
Under 1 year gang
Me
BRO SHUT UP
@@JoelmatthewYTshut up
@@finalitiesopps I accidentally clicked the report button don’t be so rude and mean
Wow! Airbus is older than the first airplane!
19th century aircrafts were magnificent...
6:44 1883?
1883? Wow! Airbus sure was ahead of it’s own time. 😆
1883 Airbus A310?? Airbus was not even there at 1883. Please improve.
and 7:45 is an A380
Boy, you are just a goof with your pictures and narration; for example, all glass cockpit doesn't refer to the aircraft's windscreens. Your mistakes are galore.
1883?🤔
😂 I was confused
proof that time travel exists... 😅
A310 came out before the Wright Flyer 💀💀💀💀
A shambles! Did anyone check this video before posting to YT?
dang I missed out on 1883 seeing the a310s never knew planes could also time travel too
BWIA or British West Indies Airways owned the The L-1011 because of Caribbean airport's short runways and they used it for USA destinations.
In 1883 the a310 was not manufactured. It was before the first flight of a aeroplane
SO much wrong in that video.
Bro it’s Bom-bar-dee-A not bomb-a-dear.
Aaaah the A310. The mainstay of the Boer War and Boxer Rebellion. Airbus really did a good job of getting in the air before that pesky Wright Brothers.
The a310 was 1983 introduced
Nobody talking about Metrojet hong kong airline when meteojet was a passanger airline💀
Some info is not correct…KLM EXEL stopped operating in 2005 so the ATR’s in the video were already retired in 2007 and the IL-62 was never owned by JAL but wetleased from Aeroflot to be able to fljy over theSovjet Union on the Tokio - Moscow route. KLM did the same since this was a faster route than flying via Anchorage.
North Korea's only airline Air Koryo, has 2 IL-62M aircraft It operates as VIP transport for government use. The IL-62 was similar to the British Vickers VC10 aircraft that were flown by several airlines and air forces worldwide. The BAE ATP was developed from the existing Hawker Siddeley HS 748.
I believe the year might be a bit EARLY
Did I miss something? Like the fact that Bill Lear is the father/inventor of the Learjet in the late 60's in Reno, NV. Yeah I just didn't hear that.
3:22 Bristol Brabazon wasn't built by SNCASE. Unfortunately.
Wow! A jet from 1883
Wait, what? 1883? So the Wright brothers were just kidding. They were attempting to fly 20 feet while Airbus was crossing oceans. Emirates later bought A310 that was almost 100 years old? Hallelujah.
We have nothing to fear from AI.
I used to fuel ATR-42s in Denver in the early 1990s....😅😅😅
Bro the Lufthansa cj1 literally says flight Training on the fuselage 😂
so off man....
*the a310 was produced in 1883*
This video is too slow, lazy, and ignorant. In the past the down vote score would have helped everyone avoid this trash. _Bring Back Down Votes!_
the a 310 was made in 1983 not 1883
6:43 1883🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Il-62 is not a “wide-body”. It has a long, single-isle fuselage.
Il-62 was not a widebody aircraft. And it did not have its engines on the wings, but at the rear part of the fuselage, much like British VC-10.
There should be a law regulating clickbaits in RUclips videos with the threat of harsh penalties
ahh the Seven Hundred and Seven. what an airplane.
If the C-17 can only lift 46 tons how does that equal three M1-A1 tanks? The M1-A1 weighs in at 55 tons each, that is 165 tons.
IL 62 engines are not mounted on the wings; they're on the tail.