In the 1800s we had the best rail system in the world. In 2023 we still largely use that same rail system that would be now rated on par with what they have in Africa and South America for derailments, speed and utility.
South africa has 5 star luxury trains. They really lovely if you want to explore and see the beauty of the country. We also have MetroBlitz and gautrain which are high speed trains
Stop lying to people, the rail system is still the largest in the world operated by freight, however the passenger one is either a hit or miss in most intercity regions
People who complain the loudest about any expansion or investment in passenger rail in the U.S. are usually those who have never ridden a train - anywhere in the world. If they ever have, they would be embarrassed for the "greatest country on earth".
In the 1980s Texas proposed a high-speed rail system from Dallas to Houston which would not be expensive, and would allow for future development of city around the train stations. Unfortunately though, Southwest airlines threatened and lied about the project. The project didn't happen. I think the state of Texas would have been a lot better if that project would have happened.
@@ABCDEFGHIJK4097 It's called construction. If you build ways to do things like you said, to get from one place to another without a car, then construct it. That is how roads were built, it's how other modes of transportation can be built too.
@@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle And? This was never part of the planning and still isn't. Especially Houston or Texas. There is no way to get around in either city without a car. If you need to rent a car after arrival, then you might as well take a car in the first place instead of the train. It's the same in CA. You are screwed without a car in LA or any other city. And there are no plans to improve any public trans in the cities. I mean, it's not like they will build a train in Texas anyway, but they are in California.
@@ABCDEFGHIJK4097 It doesn't have to be part of the planning in the past. Sooner or later if it ever does get built, it will have to be planned in order to function efficiently. Many other cities have done it. I don't see why Houston can't do it.
PASSENGER RAIL IS A PUBLIC SERVICE AND DOES NOT HAVE TO BE PROFITABLE. WE’VE SPENT TRILLIONS ON INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS THAT MAKE ZERO CENTS AND ARE MUCH LESS EFFICIENT.
Less efficient is not necessarily true. It will be faster and cheaper to drive between Ft. Lauderdale and Orlando than to take the upcoming Brightline train. Add a few passengers in your car and the economics really goes in favor of driving. And that will include the car paying tolls on the FL Turnpike - mitigating the road subsidy. Compared to driving, passenger rail only makes sense in congested areas where traffic moves very slowly, parking is at a premium, and density supports local public transportation at your destination.
@@financialconnectioninc 1. it’s only faster to drive medium distance in a car because we’re behind every other developed country when it comes to passenger rail. 2. even if you drive with a full car (which like 99% of cars are not full), a car is still probably not as efficient as a full train. 3. i’m not talking about toll roads (although i’m pretty sure those aren’t profitable either). i’m talking about the thousands of miles of free interstate roads that are entirely subsidized by the federal government in the trillions of dollars. 4. we HAD that density around passenger rail stations up until WWII when car-centric infrastructure came in and bulldozed all of it.
Our freight rail system is only the "largest' and "most profitable" because the freight rail regional monopolies let tracks sit and rot to remain "active" while only capable of supporting very occasional incredibly slow usage. They run dangerously long trains with minimal crew members, typically only 2, in order to maximize profits for the CEOs whilst overworking employees and regularly violating federal passenger train ROW laws. The "efficiency" itself is only in terms of how much goods are moved at once. Everything moves slow and is rarely on time or on schedule. BNSF for example has the worst on time performance of the Class I railroads with not a single freight movement category having being on time above 69%. That's with "on-time" being within 24 hours of schedule.
Thank you! Glad someone said it. The rails should be Federalized again, and freight companies should pay Amtrak to use them. And Amtrak should not be considered a "for-profit" organization. Nobody claims the military loses billions yearly because it is a service, not a company! These are the true reasons other developed nations do rail better than us because we're totally doing it wrong!
Well whether that’s the case or not the fact that it’s the most profitable and the fact that it has demand indicates it’s doing something right to move massive amounts of good and maintain competitiveness with trucks. Efficiency is efficiency and luxuries like new tracks unless absolutely necessary might be overly expensive and possibly the difference between profitability and not
Autónomos truck will never work !!!!! Because you will have to build truck road Because the real problem is the road and also Autónomos you have to Drive the truck before try to make law or change or build Because you will never know what going on
You’re wrong about one thing. There is two people on an locomotive at all times. A conductor and an engineer. They have tried/talked with making it only one tho. Not successful as of yet
@@ansont4787 It is not competitive with trucks. The freight railroads purposely abandoned competing with trucks to ensure their profit margins. BNSF earned 23 billion dollars in revenue in 2021. A mere fraction of that would be required to fix crumbling infrastructure and pay for employee leave time. The "efficiency" is that they operate as long trains as possible with as few engineers and locomotives as possible, rather than moving things as swiftly and coordinated as possible. The majority of a long distance freight haul is spent sitting in intermodal yards sorting the incredibly long and jumbled train. That is not efficient and why they primarily do not deal with time-sensitive goods.
The biggest problem with the US's passenger rail network is, we don't have one. We have passenger cars we can throw on freight trains. The solution to passenger rail isn't to do *anything* to the existing network, it's to aggressively build the one we need, eating up places we used to use for interstate highway expansion. If we can build a highway on it, we can build high speed rail on it.
Amtrak only owns 3 percent of the tracks?!? That is ridiculous. Well. Maybe Amtrak would make a profit if they had all the supports and subsidies of the airlines and highway interstates. I have no idea how much the states and Federal Government spend on building and maintaining roads, but I have a sneaky feeling if we spent 1/2 that amount on rail, you would see a 180 on rail. Flying is awful with uncomfortable seats, undependable schedules and delays, long security lines, etc. Wouldn’t it be nice to travel by high speed rail instead of flying?
@@asiancuteness8517 I have. For New York to DC you can book for about $35 each way if you buy in advance. So, ultimately for $70, it’s a great way to travel.
The US, instead of continuing to try to compete, should just buy out some of these railroads. I fail to understand why there is a need for there to even be private rail in the US. Train travel for moving people, products, shipping, etc is so much more efficient. The US should buy out stock in these railroads to get some more control rather than throwing it's money at new projects likes its been doing.
We saw this "world leading" freight rail network in the Palestine, Ohio disaster recently. Of course, the freight rail industry is the most profitable of any in the world. It's easy to be profitable if you stop spending money on safety, maintenance, and pay.
@@danieldipalma704 it's not high speed; It's only higher speed, and it has level crossings on the line; No high speed line has (or should have) level crossings
Lol airplane and car company will destroy train company 😂 Us transportation rule by them No wonder it look torture for long distance travel They dont have better option In my country we have bus,train,highway,plane For to another island we just have 2 , airline and sealine The defferent beetween them is time to travel With sealine travel to another island it could 3 days to a week depend how far the distance
43:08 Japan is not a flat-land... it's as mountainous as California, if not more. When you see Shinkansen routes currently under construction, such as Hokkaido Shinkansen or Chuo Shinkansen, more than 80% of the entire tracks are tunnels.
Correct. Japan isn't flat, it's very hilly and mountainous, and it's divided in many Island, so also need of long bridges over straits or submarine tunnels to connect the islands. One of longer (33.5 mi) railway tunnels in the world is in Japan (Seikan tunnel), connecting Honshu and Hokkaido islands under the Tsugaru Strait sea...
US has been so much controlled by profit making companies that they cannot do anything for public good....everyone in the decision making is so tied to their stock investments, that they do not see anything outside of that.....And, yes, I like your observation about the flat-land...these so called experts just lie to people all the time SHAMELESSLY. The person who made that "Japan is a flat land comment" is a "Berkley professor"..........It is scary how out of touch these "educated people" can be.
PSR is nothing more than a tool to help the stockholders. A two mile long train should not have autonomous operation, nor should they have single person crews.
This whole video reeks of corporate boot licking, and general poor understanding of how railroads actually work on the ground level. Treating parrallel systems like an actual reasonable idea alone discredits the rest of the piece
I believe the statement made by Craig Fuller at 2:23 is in error. I don't believe Amtrak was ever designed to be a "for-profit railroad." Further, he seems to measure Amtrak's lack of worthiness by in "unprofitability" in all of its years of existence, despite that it never was designed to make money; it was a government bailout, which are hardly ever profitable, for the government, that is. In fact, to measure profitability to most forms of transportation is a troublesome measure of utility. Is I-95 profitable? Maybe a portion in the middle, like in Delaware, can be run for a profit, but what about the part up in northern Maine? Would an airline be profitable if they had to pay for construction of airports; purchase land, gets permits, build, etc.? Does your local airport make a profit? Would Greyhound be profitable if it had to pay for construction and maintenance of highways? I think it makes more sense to measure a railroads worthiness by its passengers numbers and operation efficiency.
We need to nationalize the rail industry, there are nearly no electrified lines on the USA while making billions. The ussr was able to fully electrify their trans siberian railway and china whos the same size as the lower 48 has an extensive hsr network.
Something that amuses me is that Brightline in FL recently announced it is already turning a profit in FL with only the three stations. It's amazing what happens with a shared passenger / freight corridor when scheduling is done so that one is not constantly running at the expense of the other. Also... fun fact, most intercity trains in Europe share tracks with passenger rail (this is not the case for the LGV lines in France and some of the dedicated high speed line in other countries). In Japan a lot of intercity and commuting rail is also shared between freight and passenger rail (again, dedicated high speed corridors are separate). It's not an issue that freight and passenger rail share a right of way per se. It's that they are just all given equal priority in terms of scheduling and the systems are built in such a way to be run on precise time tables (something that anyone who has seen the actual impacts of "precision scheduled railroading" combined with the removal of double tracks and not having long enough passing sidings, etc. will agree does not work). The US could be a lot better than it is, even without building out a ton of new infrastructure in some places. And yes, we should build some dedicated high speed corridors as well.
@@AllenGraetz my understanding is that they were expecting the Miami to Orlando section to be the profitable one and that they were surprised that Miami to West Palm Beach was already profitable.
In a way the privatized system is the reason it's the most profitable. If it was nationalize the government would forego profit in exchange for more service, and better worker conditions. Vs a company would try and squeeze every last drop out of the worker.
@@ianhomerpura8937 The way it works in Europe now is more like with highways or air travel. Highways are owned built and maintained by the government (Federal, state and local) and anyone can use them to get anywhere and it's the same with airport and air traffic control - in both cases private users (including companies) can use if for free or for a fee (air travel, of course, is more controlled but still open) and in Europe railroads work the same way. In the past rail infrastructure and trains were built and maintained by the national rail company but now a separate government company (in some countries completely separated and on other a separate division of the rail company) is responsible for it, just like it does with road and air infrastructure. The national company, and other operators, can use this infrastructure to operate passengers trains (freight should follow soon) for a usage fee so you can have multiple operators on the same routs that only handle their rolling stock and operations while rail infrastructure is handled by the state. That's exactly what you need to do in the US. Now, freight operators own their own tracks and are less willing to allow others to use them thus creating a monopoly in their area so no wonder they earn billions each year.
@@plasmaboy2265 I know that the railroad is safer than the asphalt road. That is why I want the days of the good-old train to return today. Thank you for typing to me.
Traveling by Amtrak for me is about the adventure and the sights. Flying is about getting there fast while packed in a sardine can with no customer service, not to mention you are treated like a criminal while getting to plane. I have done all the flying travel I ever want to do. I had the best vacation ever last year when I took Amtrak...a relaxing adventure!!! I hope Amtrak gets the funding to continue to improve.
@@Amx479 no. There is no train on earth that reaches those speeds. Either you are mixing up mph and kph or you are grossly misinformed. The current fastest revenue service “train” is the Shanghai maglev which achieves just under 280mph
here's a thought...how about just don't cut the jobs. Being more efficient means you can carry higher capacity. Find more business. Your engineers have done a fantastic job to innovate and optimize your rail network. Don't punish the workers for doing a good job. It's now your turn, businessmen and management and sales, to find more business. It's your job.
@@HardRockMaster7577 because that wouldnt fit the narrative our corporate overlords want pushed, when they can run trains with only 1 person crews or no crew at all, they make more money, and share prices go up. Only things they care about.
43:06 Excuse me sir but Spain is europe's second most mountainous country and we built years ago high-speed rail lines on tunneling boring machines. That you can't make it is just another excuse.
Problem is that we need shorter faster nonstop routes instead of city to city. Like town to town trams turning 15 and 30 min car ride to a nonstop train and takes 5to 10
i've been to japan and was amazed at not only how quick we were getting to major destinations but almost a dozen stops along the way. but then again they were QUICK about it. you were either on time when it arrived or not. that wasnt even much of an issue though since they had trains in 15-20mins intervals. now that's service!
I think the US freight rail network will be behind the Indian rail network in a decade because India's dedicated freight corridor will be completely electric and more powerful electric locomotives will haul double stack containers that are the same length as US freight trains.
I have lived in both cities. The biggest difference is whether there's mutual running into other company's railroad system or not. As for NY, passengers have to transfer from commuter train to subway at Grand Central Terminal or Penn Sta. On the other hand for ex, Kanagawa prefecture citizens on Odakyu company train can pass through Tokyo metro subway and ride in former National Railroad of Chiba prefecture all the way without transfer. It's like Westchester citizens can go to NJ through Manhattan without transfer. This efficiency is supporting 36 million people working in greater Tokyo area.
Lots of nonsense talk here about how great the US railroad is...but the only real measure covered seems to have been profit. Anywhere else in the Common Sense 'Rest of World', Passenger > Freight and as such, safety, maintenance and interoperability is prioritised. Its not about profit, its about utility. Geographically, the US is a great use-case for Passenger Rail...but its addicted to petroleum and its cities and infrastructure is geared toward supporting the car and only the car. A shame.
@@shreyasbhat0506 The point is...direct profit shouldn't matter. It's the presumption of profit incentive that is the reason it's a dire mess at the moment.
It is stunning how few Americans know about this amazing freight rail system. This is a result of endless media propaganda that has most Americans believing that the only important railroad is Amtrak and that it is an afterthought in the US rail system that simply needs more taxpayer money to improve. Notice how 2/3 of this video is devoted to passenger rail (Amtrak). This is absurd.
All Stores Please Lower the price of all Military and Local for all Brands of Train Products and Accessories and Production Cost Now That's too much $$ The Whole World Now 🙏🙏🙏
42:55 Professor Cervero's comments about Eastern China being flatlands are true. However, when I took a HSR from Beijing to Chengdu this summer I was shocked at the number and length of tunnels going into Sichuan province. It must have been a huge expense to dig and bore them. I don't know if this geology is similar to what we have here in California, but it seems like it must have been at least as challenging as what we face going through the Tehachapi range.
Europe has an extensive system of rivers and ship canals for carrying bulk freight as well as many seaports on the Atlantic, Baltic, Black Sea and Mediterranean coasts which can be used for sea transport which are used for both bulk and intermodal containers. There are railroad breaks of gauge at the Finnish, Lithuanian, Belarussian, Ukrainian and Moldovan borders in the East and the Spanish border in the South which impede bulk transport, but create far less problems with intermodal containers; hence sea transport is used for bulk goods where possible.
@@Oinnk the railroads build super long trains to save money by running less trains, but making them bigger. A single example of an issue: your train has something happen, and you have an emergency brake application, could be a airhose that popped loose, or a 20 car derailment, you dont know which until the conductor walks the entire length of the train by themselves which can easily take at least an hour.
No one who uses the term "auto dependency" deserve the time of day. Dependency is having your mobility tied to the times and locations served by mass transit. Cars make people independent. It's the very people who grew up dependent on mass transit living in dense cities in the first half of the 20th century who rejected transit dependency by buying cars and moving to the suburbs in the second half of the century. GM might have wanted to replace street cars with buses, but even after transit companies were taken over by public not-for-profit agencies, those agencies continued removing street car lines because they were too expensive and inflexible.
The term “auto dependency” is used when the only way to get around is by car, aka your mobility is tied to you owning a car, if something were to happen to that car, you would lose your mobility. Do you understand that?
Amtrak not receiving the required priority was mentioned. A big reason for this is the precision Scheduled Railroading that was also mentioned. Why? Freight trains are sometimes if not often longer than sidings. When a short Amtrak train meets a freight train going the opposite direction, often the freight train cannot fit in a siding for a single tracked main line, therefore forcing Amtrak to get over and hold, increasing delays.
The United States desperately needs High Speed Rail. Corridors need to connect cities like Seattle and Portland, Atlanta and Charlotte, Huston, Austin and Dallas and so on.
The price of train tickets & travel time are both more expensive and longer than just flying. Unless you use it to travel ~1 hr for work it doesnt make much sense to take trains.
Its impossible to build a public transport system without tax payers money. Cars need high ways. Planes need airports. All public transport needs some form of funding from the public before it can work. This is a given.
I like how they speak about "precision freight" in glowing terms, but fail to mention how terrible it is on its crews, and how dangerous it is in terms of the crew being sick and exhausted all the time.
Not having enough money for tunneling and building bridges is not the problem. Other countries have mountains too..look at South Korea. They had to dig a lot of tunnels too, and it took a lot of time. But they did it. It's all about whether the government wants it or not.
Freight rail companies seem to really like to talk about efficiency and profits but don't say a word about safety. So much can go wrong with a 1 man crew.
Took the TGV 2 years ago from Paris to Aix-en-Provence, 3h15 from noth of France to the south part, 300 kmh most of the time, why loosing your time taking a plane
When I left the service, they paid for a one way flight, or other mode of transport, to my designated home state. With my home state being California and that I was stationed in DC, I decided, since I’m in no hurry, why not take a train across the country. It turned out to be too difficult for the military to process, and they sighed and cried, something to the effect of ‘why do you have to be so difficult??’, so I opted for a flight instead 😂
It's sad that major media doesn't show/report what exist and possible. Right now, there is a structure called "Maglev (Magnetic Levitation)" (came to life in 1933) in Germany, China, and Japan but nobody pays attention (maybe due to lobbying). Japan achieved highest speed so far with Super Conducting Maglev with 603 km/hr or 375 mph. And guess what, it doesn't require energy and it doesn't require physical driver. It's time to build new transportation infrastructure with maglev rather than fight and deal with freight railroads and keep losing money and time.
The railroad executive says in one sentence how they want to compete for business, but in the next, says the laws that force competition is "wrong headed".
One more thing to note is that because of the privatized infrastructure there are almost no electrified tracks in the US which defeats the entire purpose of trains being sustainable alternatives. If the diesel trains are running with low passengers it might even be better to just have cars... 😕 Saying this as a rail fan
I think that it’s probably still better because while there are a lot of diesel locomotives, they are probably a lot less of them compared to automobiles, so that’s probably why it’s less than cars. That being said that’s still isn’t that good for omissions, and considering that railways seem not to want to electrify, it would probably take the arrival of hydrogen locomotives to decrease that
If they want Amtrac profitable then it needs to go 100mph minimum, the tickets 50-100$ and the influx of people will allow you to readjust accordingly.
Amtrak shouldn't need to be profitable, it should just be a good option which provides essential transportation to communities that don't have anything else and serves as an alternative to driving and flying
@@The_king567 Why? Who said that? Was it written on a stone tablet on Mt. Sinai? The point of government owned services should be to provide a service. If it can be made profitable, that's great. But the government operating a service that is expensive and low quality just to turn a profit defeats the point of that service even existing in the first place, especially when there are massive benefits to running a high quality yet unprofitable service.
Isn't that embarrassing for such a rich and proud country? If the US really wanted, they could build a world class high speed strain network with two or three decades, but it would need investments of at least $100 billion per year. That does not look impossible in a country that spends more than $800 billion per year on the military. I know that a strong military is important for the US, but a lot of money is wasted there. At least the routes from Los Angeles to San Francisco and from New York City to Chicago should be built as soon as possible. Those will very likely be profitable over time, because air travel will become more and more expensive over time. I was in China a few times and the rail network there is such a convenience. The 190 mile journey from Shanghai to Nanjing takes less than 90 minutes and is cheaper than a taxi ride from JFK Airport to Manhattan. So it is easy to spontaneously visit Nanjing for a few hours. That train feels like flying. Even within the city limits of Shanghai it already reaches more than 200 miles per hour.
Just imagine retiring as a registered nurse,using all your income/salary to pay rent and tax without any good investment or means of extra cash, tending to leave your profession/ job that has been part of you for many years with no good funds. How will you cope
Highways cost a ton of money to build and yet it's almost never a problem throwing money at building more highways but apparently high speed rail is just impossible because of the cost. We can build these sorts of things we just need to have the will to do it.
Taxpayers pay for the interstate system, why not the rail-bed and stations? Use a toll-mileage system (e.g. toll highways) and hub-rental fee (e.g. airports) to pass through some of the cost to privatized rail companies (both passenger & rail).
There really shouldn't be room for trucking to compete. If you had a 4 track right of way you could have the equivalent of "autonomous trucks" in seconds. From a climate standpoint trains will always be vastly superior. I think trucks (excluding last mile) can only compete because tax payers fund the creation, expansion and maintenance of roads. Then you have the trucking mega companies exploiting truckers and the short sighted ceos controlling the freight train monopoly... pretty sad situation all around.
Increasing high speed passenger options directly increases the flow of goods in this country. FOR THE POSITIVE. the amount of jobs to change the system is also a major positive. There is absolutely not one detriment to high speed rail.
Unless you build separate track for passenger trains it would be stupid to increase passenger service on existing track.Passengers won`t tolerate sitting on a siding for a few hours while more profitable freight is on a different time schedule.Passengers need much more service and room than freight does.Passengers care what hour of the day they get to where they are going.The overall cost of train travel is not convenient when people don`t live mostly in cities.People don`t want to give up the flexibility of personal travel of their time and choosing.The only way passenger travel makes sense is dedicated long distance travel in the United States is high speed service over long distances and as fast as airplanes. That would be about 200 miles an hour faster than today`s high speed trains. This would lower the price of air travel after the infrastructure was built. The infrastructure would be highly expensive but could recoup the costs over time.
Boy, what a one sided coverage. Labor is abused in different ways in both rail and trucks. And you forgot that it is important for the environment to remove excess profits from the railroads and thereby shift more cargo away from trucks.
PSR is terrible. Longer trains blocking communities and dangerous safety violations. And trains don’t fit into sidings causing delays for the passengers trains
If a train is routinely blocking traffic, you can blame that on the city for building at grade crossings instead of over/underpasses. Railroad was there way before most structures were.
Honestly something about the same companies owning the rails and the trains rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it would be better for the market if the tracks were publicly ownes (like highways) and railroad companies could operate nationwide as a result, untethered to a territory. Plus it would allow for more favor to be shown to passenger rail. Heck the contract to use the rail could stipulate rail companies must procide passenger service. I'm just spitballing here so take it with a grain of salt
We need cheaper national rail fares and tickets. More expensive than a round trip plane fare. Also, new rail lines, high speed railing system (both national and commuter rails), and better commuter rail to public transportation stations/connections.
Autónomos truck will never work !!!!! Because you will have to build truck road Because the real problem is the road and also Autónomos you have to Drive the truck before try to make law or change or build Because you will never know what going on
![Tee Grizzley - Blow for Blow (feat. J. Cole) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNLN5xsx5dc/mqdefault.jpg)
In the 1800s we had the best rail system in the world. In 2023 we still largely use that same rail system that would be now rated on par with what they have in Africa and South America for derailments, speed and utility.
South africa has 5 star luxury trains. They really lovely if you want to explore and see the beauty of the country. We also have MetroBlitz and gautrain which are high speed trains
planes, cars and enough space = no need for passenger trains
Lies again? Harvard Barcelona Orlando Ezlink Card
No one cares, we are the best at everything else
Stop lying to people, the rail system is still the largest in the world operated by freight, however the passenger one is either a hit or miss in most intercity regions
People who complain the loudest about any expansion or investment in passenger rail in the U.S. are usually those who have never ridden a train - anywhere in the world. If they ever have, they would be embarrassed for the "greatest country on earth".
This
Whats really embarrassing is a train from Boston to DC takes 7 hours- its too bad they cant have a faster more efficient train service
absofuckinglutely
@@giovannidibravato5576Seperate high speed rail lines.
That’s a good thing the most common former transportation in the world is not trains its cars read a book
In the 1980s Texas proposed a high-speed rail system from Dallas to Houston which would not be expensive, and would allow for future development of city around the train stations. Unfortunately though, Southwest airlines threatened and lied about the project. The project didn't happen. I think the state of Texas would have been a lot better if that project would have happened.
Damn!! That would have been great.
Okay, great idea. But how do you get around in those cities without a car if you take the train? You can't.
@@ABCDEFGHIJK4097 It's called construction. If you build ways to do things like you said, to get from one place to another without a car, then construct it. That is how roads were built, it's how other modes of transportation can be built too.
@@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle And? This was never part of the planning and still isn't. Especially Houston or Texas. There is no way to get around in either city without a car. If you need to rent a car after arrival, then you might as well take a car in the first place instead of the train. It's the same in CA. You are screwed without a car in LA or any other city. And there are no plans to improve any public trans in the cities. I mean, it's not like they will build a train in Texas anyway, but they are in California.
@@ABCDEFGHIJK4097 It doesn't have to be part of the planning in the past. Sooner or later if it ever does get built, it will have to be planned in order to function efficiently. Many other cities have done it. I don't see why Houston can't do it.
PASSENGER RAIL IS A PUBLIC SERVICE AND DOES NOT HAVE TO BE PROFITABLE. WE’VE SPENT TRILLIONS ON INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS THAT MAKE ZERO CENTS AND ARE MUCH LESS EFFICIENT.
Yeah the inconsistent profitability standard is annoying.
Less efficient is not necessarily true. It will be faster and cheaper to drive between Ft. Lauderdale and Orlando than to take the upcoming Brightline train. Add a few passengers in your car and the economics really goes in favor of driving. And that will include the car paying tolls on the FL Turnpike - mitigating the road subsidy. Compared to driving, passenger rail only makes sense in congested areas where traffic moves very slowly, parking is at a premium, and density supports local public transportation at your destination.
@@financialconnectioninc 1. it’s only faster to drive medium distance in a car because we’re behind every other developed country when it comes to passenger rail. 2. even if you drive with a full car (which like 99% of cars are not full), a car is still probably not as efficient as a full train. 3. i’m not talking about toll roads (although i’m pretty sure those aren’t profitable either). i’m talking about the thousands of miles of free interstate roads that are entirely subsidized by the federal government in the trillions of dollars. 4. we HAD that density around passenger rail stations up until WWII when car-centric infrastructure came in and bulldozed all of it.
that's so true
Spending trillions on highways are still ok. What about the $2 trillion spend on nothing in Afghanistan?
Our freight rail system is only the "largest' and "most profitable" because the freight rail regional monopolies let tracks sit and rot to remain "active" while only capable of supporting very occasional incredibly slow usage. They run dangerously long trains with minimal crew members, typically only 2, in order to maximize profits for the CEOs whilst overworking employees and regularly violating federal passenger train ROW laws. The "efficiency" itself is only in terms of how much goods are moved at once. Everything moves slow and is rarely on time or on schedule. BNSF for example has the worst on time performance of the Class I railroads with not a single freight movement category having being on time above 69%. That's with "on-time" being within 24 hours of schedule.
Thank you! Glad someone said it. The rails should be Federalized again, and freight companies should pay Amtrak to use them. And Amtrak should not be considered a "for-profit" organization. Nobody claims the military loses billions yearly because it is a service, not a company! These are the true reasons other developed nations do rail better than us because we're totally doing it wrong!
Well whether that’s the case or not the fact that it’s the most profitable and the fact that it has demand indicates it’s doing something right to move massive amounts of good and maintain competitiveness with trucks. Efficiency is efficiency and luxuries like new tracks unless absolutely necessary might be overly expensive and possibly the difference between profitability and not
Autónomos truck will never work !!!!! Because you will have to build truck road Because the real problem is the road and also Autónomos you have to Drive the truck before try to make law or change or build Because you will never know what going on
You’re wrong about one thing. There is two people on an locomotive at all times. A conductor and an engineer. They have tried/talked with making it only one tho. Not successful as of yet
@@ansont4787 It is not competitive with trucks. The freight railroads purposely abandoned competing with trucks to ensure their profit margins. BNSF earned 23 billion dollars in revenue in 2021. A mere fraction of that would be required to fix crumbling infrastructure and pay for employee leave time. The "efficiency" is that they operate as long trains as possible with as few engineers and locomotives as possible, rather than moving things as swiftly and coordinated as possible. The majority of a long distance freight haul is spent sitting in intermodal yards sorting the incredibly long and jumbled train. That is not efficient and why they primarily do not deal with time-sensitive goods.
The biggest problem with the US's passenger rail network is, we don't have one. We have passenger cars we can throw on freight trains. The solution to passenger rail isn't to do *anything* to the existing network, it's to aggressively build the one we need, eating up places we used to use for interstate highway expansion. If we can build a highway on it, we can build high speed rail on it.
Trains are so beneficial.
so fascinating too.
Not to anyone
@@kushclarkkent6669not really
Amtrak only owns 3 percent of the tracks?!? That is ridiculous. Well. Maybe Amtrak would make a profit if they had all the supports and subsidies of the airlines and highway interstates. I have no idea how much the states and Federal Government spend on building and maintaining roads, but I have a sneaky feeling if we spent 1/2 that amount on rail, you would see a 180 on rail. Flying is awful with uncomfortable seats, undependable schedules and delays, long security lines, etc. Wouldn’t it be nice to travel by high speed rail instead of flying?
Amtrak is a goverment subsidy…no need for subsidies if your budget somes from the government.
I like how there was a $99 ticket and he chose the expensive one for the Amtrak price comparison
noticed the same...not a fair representation!!
Still trash, only a masochist would travel by train in the US and the rare exceptions (lines) usually don't take you very far.
Have you ever tried to book a train trip?
@@asiancuteness8517 I have. For New York to DC you can book for about $35 each way if you buy in advance. So, ultimately for $70, it’s a great way to travel.
@@johntathers8276exactly. Sadly outside the northeast rail is really bad.
Freight railroad executive says, "The system works." Hahaha! Works for him!
It is their system after all.
@@jrebytes6669 Created primarily by land grants from the federal government and still subject to law requiring Amtrak to have priority.
The US, instead of continuing to try to compete, should just buy out some of these railroads. I fail to understand why there is a need for there to even be private rail in the US. Train travel for moving people, products, shipping, etc is so much more efficient.
The US should buy out stock in these railroads to get some more control rather than throwing it's money at new projects likes its been doing.
We saw this "world leading" freight rail network in the Palestine, Ohio disaster recently. Of course, the freight rail industry is the most profitable of any in the world. It's easy to be profitable if you stop spending money on safety, maintenance, and pay.
East Palestine didn't have anything to do with rail infrastructure. It was a bearing failure.
How sad that the US is SO far behind in modern rapid rail transit smh.
dumb politicians.
Lmao no way you said that what’s the most common form of transportation in the world it’s not trains it’s cars
Fast high Speed rail is what we need!
Insurance will never allow high speed. This country loves to sue so it won't ever be fast.
is there slow high speed?
@@EnjoyFirefighting yes, there's the one in Florida...
@@danieldipalma704 it's not high speed; It's only higher speed, and it has level crossings on the line; No high speed line has (or should have) level crossings
Lol airplane and car company will destroy train company 😂
Us transportation rule by them
No wonder it look torture for long distance travel
They dont have better option
In my country we have bus,train,highway,plane
For to another island we just have 2 , airline and sealine
The defferent beetween them is time to travel
With sealine travel to another island it could 3 days to a week depend how far the distance
43:08 Japan is not a flat-land... it's as mountainous as California, if not more. When you see Shinkansen routes currently under construction, such as Hokkaido Shinkansen or Chuo Shinkansen, more than 80% of the entire tracks are tunnels.
Correct. Japan isn't flat, it's very hilly and mountainous, and it's divided in many Island, so also need of long bridges over straits or submarine tunnels to connect the islands. One of longer (33.5 mi) railway tunnels in the world is in Japan (Seikan tunnel), connecting Honshu and Hokkaido islands under the Tsugaru Strait sea...
US has been so much controlled by profit making companies that they cannot do anything for public good....everyone in the decision making is so tied to their stock investments, that they do not see anything outside of that.....And, yes, I like your observation about the flat-land...these so called experts just lie to people all the time SHAMELESSLY. The person who made that "Japan is a flat land comment" is a "Berkley professor"..........It is scary how out of touch these "educated people" can be.
PSR is nothing more than a tool to help the stockholders. A two mile long train should not have autonomous operation, nor should they have single person crews.
This whole video reeks of corporate boot licking, and general poor understanding of how railroads actually work on the ground level.
Treating parrallel systems like an actual reasonable idea alone discredits the rest of the piece
I believe the statement made by Craig Fuller at 2:23 is in error. I don't believe Amtrak was ever designed to be a "for-profit railroad." Further, he seems to measure Amtrak's lack of worthiness by in "unprofitability" in all of its years of existence, despite that it never was designed to make money; it was a government bailout, which are hardly ever profitable, for the government, that is.
In fact, to measure profitability to most forms of transportation is a troublesome measure of utility. Is I-95 profitable? Maybe a portion in the middle, like in Delaware, can be run for a profit, but what about the part up in northern Maine? Would an airline be profitable if they had to pay for construction of airports; purchase land, gets permits, build, etc.? Does your local airport make a profit? Would Greyhound be profitable if it had to pay for construction and maintenance of highways? I think it makes more sense to measure a railroads worthiness by its passengers numbers and operation efficiency.
We need to nationalize the rail industry, there are nearly no electrified lines on the USA while making billions. The ussr was able to fully electrify their trans siberian railway and china whos the same size as the lower 48 has an extensive hsr network.
Something that amuses me is that Brightline in FL recently announced it is already turning a profit in FL with only the three stations.
It's amazing what happens with a shared passenger / freight corridor when scheduling is done so that one is not constantly running at the expense of the other.
Also... fun fact, most intercity trains in Europe share tracks with passenger rail (this is not the case for the LGV lines in France and some of the dedicated high speed line in other countries).
In Japan a lot of intercity and commuting rail is also shared between freight and passenger rail (again, dedicated high speed corridors are separate).
It's not an issue that freight and passenger rail share a right of way per se. It's that they are just all given equal priority in terms of scheduling and the systems are built in such a way to be run on precise time tables (something that anyone who has seen the actual impacts of "precision scheduled railroading" combined with the removal of double tracks and not having long enough passing sidings, etc. will agree does not work).
The US could be a lot better than it is, even without building out a ton of new infrastructure in some places.
And yes, we should build some dedicated high speed corridors as well.
Brightline announce a small section had an operating profit. It will be quite some time before they're Miami-Orlando line is profitable, if ever.
@@AllenGraetz my understanding is that they were expecting the Miami to Orlando section to be the profitable one and that they were surprised that Miami to West Palm Beach was already profitable.
Why do they refuse to electrify their tracks?
diesel mafia
lack of incentives, imo if a privately owned track is electrified it should pay way less tax then non electified track
Why do something that we've already done and found out that their are better options?
14:26 ah yes, all hail the great shareholders
We need high speed rail.
I swear a high speed rail system is set to come in California
In a way the privatized system is the reason it's the most profitable. If it was nationalize the government would forego profit in exchange for more service, and better worker conditions. Vs a company would try and squeeze every last drop out of the worker.
what is wrong with foregoing profit though, as if everything depend on it?
@@ianhomerpura8937 The way it works in Europe now is more like with highways or air travel. Highways are owned built and maintained by the government (Federal, state and local) and anyone can use them to get anywhere and it's the same with airport and air traffic control - in both cases private users (including companies) can use if for free or for a fee (air travel, of course, is more controlled but still open) and in Europe railroads work the same way. In the past rail infrastructure and trains were built and maintained by the national rail company but now a separate government company (in some countries completely separated and on other a separate division of the rail company) is responsible for it, just like it does with road and air infrastructure. The national company, and other operators, can use this infrastructure to operate passengers trains (freight should follow soon) for a usage fee so you can have multiple operators on the same routs that only handle their rolling stock and operations while rail infrastructure is handled by the state.
That's exactly what you need to do in the US. Now, freight operators own their own tracks and are less willing to allow others to use them thus creating a monopoly in their area so no wonder they earn billions each year.
@@ianhomerpura8937 You going to work for FREE? Nothing wrong with making $$!
For long distance rides, riding Amtrak is more economical, safer and reliable than flying by airplane.
And it’s safer than cars
@@plasmaboy2265 I know that the railroad is safer than the asphalt road. That is why I want the days of the good-old train to return today. Thank you for typing to me.
@@captainkeyboard1007 same here
@@plasmaboy2265 👌
I hope people support USA HIGH SPEED rail ✌
We won’t
Traveling by Amtrak for me is about the adventure and the sights. Flying is about getting there fast while packed in a sardine can with no customer service, not to mention you are treated like a criminal while getting to plane. I have done all the flying travel I ever want to do. I had the best vacation ever last year when I took Amtrak...a relaxing adventure!!! I hope Amtrak gets the funding to continue to improve.
I took the high speed trains in Italy- average speed 180 mph. Under $100 round trip to most cities in Italy.
China 600 mph is the norm😂😂😂
@@Amx479 no. There is no train on earth that reaches those speeds. Either you are mixing up mph and kph or you are grossly misinformed.
The current fastest revenue service “train” is the Shanghai maglev which achieves just under 280mph
@@Amx479 600 kmh
I flew into Venice and after 3 days took the train to FLorence and then Rome. The train was 180mph and it was awesome. They are way ahead of USA
There should be light rail systems in every major city & there should be a nationwide light rail system!
here's a thought...how about just don't cut the jobs. Being more efficient means you can carry higher capacity. Find more business. Your engineers have done a fantastic job to innovate and optimize your rail network. Don't punish the workers for doing a good job. It's now your turn, businessmen and management and sales, to find more business. It's your job.
Insane and biased that CNBC didn’t even mention the safety concerns of the unions.
Very Interesting that NO mention of safety was made.
@@HardRockMaster7577 because that wouldnt fit the narrative our corporate overlords want pushed, when they can run trains with only 1 person crews or no crew at all, they make more money, and share prices go up. Only things they care about.
43:06 Excuse me sir but Spain is europe's second most mountainous country and we built years ago high-speed rail lines on tunneling boring machines. That you can't make it is just another excuse.
and japanese shinkansen lines require alot of tunneling and viaducts
Restore the old-fashioned days of the good-old days of the American railroad, and do it now! America needs to get back into "training."
No we don’t
@@The_king567 Thank you for typing.
@@The_king567 We need high speed train.
@@razm3610 no we definitely don’t
@@The_king567 We do....:)
Problem is that we need shorter faster nonstop routes instead of city to city. Like town to town trams turning 15 and 30 min car ride to a nonstop train and takes 5to 10
Like China
i've been to japan and was amazed at not only how quick we were getting to major destinations but almost a dozen stops along the way. but then again they were QUICK about it. you were either on time when it arrived or not. that wasnt even much of an issue though since they had trains in 15-20mins intervals. now that's service!
And connecting those tram lines to commuter and rapid rail transits. We need more commuter and rapid bus and water transit lines as well.
They blowing bubbles on Precision Railroading (PSR)
I think the US freight rail network will be behind the Indian rail network in a decade because India's dedicated freight corridor will be completely electric and more powerful electric locomotives will haul double stack containers that are the same length as US freight trains.
I am at the halfway point between New York and Chicago on the CSX line
I have lived in both cities. The biggest difference is whether there's mutual running into other company's railroad system or not. As for NY, passengers have to transfer from commuter train to subway at Grand Central Terminal or Penn Sta. On the other hand for ex, Kanagawa prefecture citizens on Odakyu company train can pass through Tokyo metro subway and ride in former National Railroad of Chiba prefecture all the way without transfer. It's like Westchester citizens can go to NJ through Manhattan without transfer. This efficiency is supporting 36 million people working in greater Tokyo area.
Lots of nonsense talk here about how great the US railroad is...but the only real measure covered seems to have been profit. Anywhere else in the Common Sense 'Rest of World', Passenger > Freight and as such, safety, maintenance and interoperability is prioritised. Its not about profit, its about utility. Geographically, the US is a great use-case for Passenger Rail...but its addicted to petroleum and its cities and infrastructure is geared toward supporting the car and only the car. A shame.
Couldn't agree more, the US has the capacity to pump out millions in profit if a sustainable network is built
@@shreyasbhat0506 The point is...direct profit shouldn't matter. It's the presumption of profit incentive that is the reason it's a dire mess at the moment.
It is stunning how few Americans know about this amazing freight rail system. This is a result of endless media propaganda that has most Americans believing that the only important railroad is Amtrak and that it is an afterthought in the US rail system that simply needs more taxpayer money to improve. Notice how 2/3 of this video is devoted to passenger rail (Amtrak). This is absurd.
All Stores Please Lower the price of all Military and Local for all Brands of Train Products and Accessories and Production Cost Now That's too much $$ The Whole World Now 🙏🙏🙏
42:55 Professor Cervero's comments about Eastern China being flatlands are true. However, when I took a HSR from Beijing to Chengdu this summer I was shocked at the number and length of tunnels going into Sichuan province. It must have been a huge expense to dig and bore them. I don't know if this geology is similar to what we have here in California, but it seems like it must have been at least as challenging as what we face going through the Tehachapi range.
did he just say the flatlands of japan?
Europe has an extensive system of rivers and ship canals for carrying bulk freight as well as many seaports on the Atlantic, Baltic, Black Sea and Mediterranean coasts which can be used for sea transport which are used for both bulk and intermodal containers. There are railroad breaks of gauge at the Finnish, Lithuanian, Belarussian, Ukrainian and Moldovan borders in the East and the Spanish border in the South which impede bulk transport, but create far less problems with intermodal containers; hence sea transport is used for bulk goods where possible.
Yes two drivers per train seems fair. It's a massive responsibility, so many people want to get rich but don't want to do the job properly...
ain’t no way that they’re glossing over the issues with PSR 😭
Care to explain? I’m curious.
@@Oinnk the railroads build super long trains to save money by running less trains, but making them bigger.
A single example of an issue: your train has something happen, and you have an emergency brake application, could be a airhose that popped loose, or a 20 car derailment, you dont know which until the conductor walks the entire length of the train by themselves which can easily take at least an hour.
CNBC, change your description. China has more than 40000 km of high-speed railtrack and you say that's just 19000?
They said 19000+ miles not kilometres
Spider 6660 I really hope that you delete this comment.
Arguing a minimum crew of 2 rule for a train that might be 2 miles long is wrong is insane.
No one who uses the term "auto dependency" deserve the time of day. Dependency is having your mobility tied to the times and locations served by mass transit. Cars make people independent. It's the very people who grew up dependent on mass transit living in dense cities in the first half of the 20th century who rejected transit dependency by buying cars and moving to the suburbs in the second half of the century. GM might have wanted to replace street cars with buses, but even after transit companies were taken over by public not-for-profit agencies, those agencies continued removing street car lines because they were too expensive and inflexible.
The term “auto dependency” is used when the only way to get around is by car, aka your mobility is tied to you owning a car, if something were to happen to that car, you would lose your mobility. Do you understand that?
Amtrak not receiving the required priority was mentioned. A big reason for this is the precision Scheduled Railroading that was also mentioned. Why? Freight trains are sometimes if not often longer than sidings. When a short Amtrak train meets a freight train going the opposite direction, often the freight train cannot fit in a siding for a single tracked main line, therefore forcing Amtrak to get over and hold, increasing delays.
The United States desperately needs High Speed Rail. Corridors need to connect cities like Seattle and Portland, Atlanta and Charlotte, Huston, Austin and Dallas and so on.
No, we definitely don’t need it. It’s a waste of money and time.
@@The_king567 sounds like you have never experienced high speed rail and you aren't very educated on the subject.
@@nexusoflife that’s a good thing and I never will
@@The_king567 so strange. You think willful ignorance is good?
Imagine if Johnson trucking owned the Highway system. The tracks need to be federalized.
You can't just federalize things that you don't like.
@@jrebytes6669 that's why we have a crap rail system
No they definitely don’t The government should not be in control of anything.
@@The_king567so you want Jonson to own the interstate system?
@@darthmaul216 yes
The price of train tickets & travel time are both more expensive and longer than just flying. Unless you use it to travel ~1 hr for work it doesnt make much sense to take trains.
Its impossible to build a public transport system without tax payers money. Cars need high ways. Planes need airports. All public transport needs some form of funding from the public before it can work. This is a given.
I like how they speak about "precision freight" in glowing terms, but fail to mention how terrible it is on its crews, and how dangerous it is in terms of the crew being sick and exhausted all the time.
Not having enough money for tunneling and building bridges is not the problem. Other countries have mountains too..look at South Korea. They had to dig a lot of tunnels too, and it took a lot of time. But they did it. It's all about whether the government wants it or not.
Ihr habt schon geile Loks....Grüße von Deutschand....🙂
Freight rail companies seem to really like to talk about efficiency and profits but don't say a word about safety. So much can go wrong with a 1 man crew.
Took the TGV 2 years ago from Paris to Aix-en-Provence, 3h15 from noth of France to the south part, 300 kmh most of the time, why loosing your time taking a plane
When I left the service, they paid for a one way flight, or other mode of transport, to my designated home state. With my home state being California and that I was stationed in DC, I decided, since I’m in no hurry, why not take a train across the country. It turned out to be too difficult for the military to process, and they sighed and cried, something to the effect of ‘why do you have to be so difficult??’, so I opted for a flight instead 😂
Passenger rail
It's sad that major media doesn't show/report what exist and possible. Right now, there is a structure called "Maglev (Magnetic Levitation)" (came to life in 1933) in Germany, China, and Japan but nobody pays attention (maybe due to lobbying). Japan achieved highest speed so far with Super Conducting Maglev with 603 km/hr or 375 mph. And guess what, it doesn't require energy and it doesn't require physical driver. It's time to build new transportation infrastructure with maglev rather than fight and deal with freight railroads and keep losing money and time.
Muito bom
The railroad executive says in one sentence how they want to compete for business, but in the next, says the laws that force competition is "wrong headed".
One more thing to note is that because of the privatized infrastructure there are almost no electrified tracks in the US which defeats the entire purpose of trains being sustainable alternatives. If the diesel trains are running with low passengers it might even be better to just have cars... 😕 Saying this as a rail fan
I think that it’s probably still better because while there are a lot of diesel locomotives, they are probably a lot less of them compared to automobiles, so that’s probably why it’s less than cars. That being said that’s still isn’t that good for omissions, and considering that railways seem not to want to electrify, it would probably take the arrival of hydrogen locomotives to decrease that
@@lucasquintanilla1673 Even when stuff is electrified you have stuff like Chicago commuter trains running diesel on compleely electrified tracks.
If they want Amtrac profitable then it needs to go 100mph minimum, the tickets 50-100$ and the influx of people will allow you to readjust accordingly.
Amtrak shouldn't need to be profitable, it should just be a good option which provides essential transportation to communities that don't have anything else and serves as an alternative to driving and flying
No trains are not profitable
@@Ry_TSGnope if the government owns it, it should be profitable. That’s how that works.
@@The_king567 Why? Who said that? Was it written on a stone tablet on Mt. Sinai? The point of government owned services should be to provide a service. If it can be made profitable, that's great. But the government operating a service that is expensive and low quality just to turn a profit defeats the point of that service even existing in the first place, especially when there are massive benefits to running a high quality yet unprofitable service.
@@Ry_TSG the whole point of services is to make a profit
✝️🔯😇🧄🕊️🐑🤍🎁👽🌍🌎🌏🌠🪐🦅🇺🇸Holy Psalm 91 Jesus and Kathryn Miller say Thankyou for sharing ✝️🤍✝️🤍✝️🍀🍀🍀🦅🇺🇸
Isn't that embarrassing for such a rich and proud country? If the US really wanted, they could build a world class high speed strain network with two or three decades, but it would need investments of at least $100 billion per year. That does not look impossible in a country that spends more than $800 billion per year on the military. I know that a strong military is important for the US, but a lot of money is wasted there.
At least the routes from Los Angeles to San Francisco and from New York City to Chicago should be built as soon as possible. Those will very likely be profitable over time, because air travel will become more and more expensive over time.
I was in China a few times and the rail network there is such a convenience. The 190 mile journey from Shanghai to Nanjing takes less than 90 minutes and is cheaper than a taxi ride from JFK Airport to Manhattan. So it is easy to spontaneously visit Nanjing for a few hours. That train feels like flying. Even within the city limits of Shanghai it already reaches more than 200 miles per hour.
36:10 dont forget italy
Just imagine retiring as a registered nurse,using all your income/salary to pay rent and tax without any good investment or means of extra cash, tending to leave your profession/ job that has been part of you for many years with no good funds. How will you cope
Highways cost a ton of money to build and yet it's almost never a problem throwing money at building more highways but apparently high speed rail is just impossible because of the cost. We can build these sorts of things we just need to have the will to do it.
Taxpayers pay for the interstate system, why not the rail-bed and stations? Use a toll-mileage system (e.g. toll highways) and hub-rental fee (e.g. airports) to pass through some of the cost to privatized rail companies (both passenger & rail).
There really shouldn't be room for trucking to compete. If you had a 4 track right of way you could have the equivalent of "autonomous trucks" in seconds. From a climate standpoint trains will always be vastly superior. I think trucks (excluding last mile) can only compete because tax payers fund the creation, expansion and maintenance of roads. Then you have the trucking mega companies exploiting truckers and the short sighted ceos controlling the freight train monopoly... pretty sad situation all around.
Did I see Kicking Horse Pass?
0:35 simple title!
America “first in last” 🤘🏼
What they don’t say bout the UP is that the SP bought the UP but uses the UP name
No wonder I hate cars.
Increasing high speed passenger options directly increases the flow of goods in this country. FOR THE POSITIVE. the amount of jobs to change the system is also a major positive. There is absolutely not one detriment to high speed rail.
Only in a conversation about rail am I considered as part of the younger people group.
Take the bus instead for DC to NYC.
Same reason other American countries can’t have HSR
The flatlands of Japan? LOL shinkansen literally crosses mountains.
I been a truckers 42 years you the news media keeps saying there is a driver shortage. This is a lie there is not a driver shortage according to ooida
Unless you build separate track for passenger trains it would be stupid to increase passenger service on existing track.Passengers won`t tolerate sitting on a siding for a few hours while more profitable freight is on a different time schedule.Passengers need much more service and room than freight does.Passengers care what hour of the day they get to where they are going.The overall cost of train travel is not convenient when people don`t live mostly in cities.People don`t want to give up the flexibility of personal travel of their time and choosing.The only way passenger travel makes sense is dedicated long distance travel in the United States is high speed service over long distances and as fast as airplanes. That would be about 200 miles an hour faster than today`s high speed trains. This would lower the price of air travel after the infrastructure was built. The infrastructure would be highly expensive but could recoup the costs over time.
The north east corridor has freight trains, difference is that the passenger trains take priority
thanks for sharing
Boy, what a one sided coverage. Labor is abused in different ways in both rail and trucks. And you forgot that it is important for the environment to remove excess profits from the railroads and thereby shift more cargo away from trucks.
When winter comes they should slow it down a little bit. Moisture changes the rail roads just like highways. 👍
PSR is terrible. Longer trains blocking communities and dangerous safety violations. And trains don’t fit into sidings causing delays for the passengers trains
If a train is routinely blocking traffic, you can blame that on the city for building at grade crossings instead of over/underpasses. Railroad was there way before most structures were.
Amtrak can turn a profit.
Nationalise the private rail lines. Private ownership over natural monopolies is absurd and unethical.
Honestly something about the same companies owning the rails and the trains rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it would be better for the market if the tracks were publicly ownes (like highways) and railroad companies could operate nationwide as a result, untethered to a territory. Plus it would allow for more favor to be shown to passenger rail. Heck the contract to use the rail could stipulate rail companies must procide passenger service. I'm just spitballing here so take it with a grain of salt
PSR doesn't make the RRs more efficient, it's a hit mess.
We need cheaper national rail fares and tickets. More expensive than a round trip plane fare. Also, new rail lines, high speed railing system (both national and commuter rails), and better commuter rail to public transportation stations/connections.
Autónomos truck will never work !!!!! Because you will have to build truck road Because the real problem is the road and also Autónomos you have to Drive the truck before try to make law or change or build Because you will never know what going on
Ahhh but what about weapons and money for the war?
42:00 represents california itself, not just the railroad. Too bad there are no adults in the room gavin
At lot of these issues would go away if lobbying was banned for what it is - bribery and corruption
Moaning about a two man crew working a 15,000 ton train that's over 2km long.....
East Palestine "do we mean nothing to you...?"
With all of the derailments and accidents we see in the media, it just doesn't feel safe. Plus, it's slow Meh.
Yeah none of that is true. But hey keep driving your car. Look up what your odds are of dying in that thing😂
PoliceFreeTravelHOBOrail?