iv used this offshore, works great there in a wearhouse, try it underdeck offshore where the I beams are never at the point you want to put your dropper, load of crap, tube and fitting you can't beat it.
Hey HAKI. Just curios. Is that ALLUMINIUM? It looks very light. I'm amazed at how you built out n down wards. I'm amazed that all that stress past the Fulcrum. point on those 2 beams. with no spur. and lowering those boards is unbelievable.
About 20K in plant for a 1 lift dropper, about 1.5K in plant using tube and fitting for the same application which has a proven track record in over 80 years of use. Don't get me wrong clever system indeed, but considering the vast majority of the UK's scaffold erectors are SME organisations with the emphasis on small sub 500k T/O they simply cannot afford to invest in expensive system scaffolds for niche applications whereas their bread and butter is in traditional Tube and Fitting. You see this is the major issue with system as oppose to T and F. You have limitless scope in T and F due to no pre-set component sizes. I've seen specialised one off system components made for one off applications due to nothing available as a stock item, this is a massive cost to the end user, in T and F, cut the tubes to suit and job done. This is why you will never see system readily used in general street work scaffolding as it costs too much and lacks versatility. Absolutely fine for large big square box builds, but useless when your have to erect in gaps sub 2ft wide with buildings that are not true or twisted with age.
Infill plates are cool. I dont see why you bother setting up the "safe" zone befor continuing the frame since you need to be tied off anyways. Just adding time. Unless your dealing with ppl afraid of heights I guess.
try dropping 8 lifts down a leg underdeck offshore, no way this crap works, very ristricted to bay sizes, you just cant move it 3 inches one way or another, iv used it, every haki sacffold i needed tube and fitting to tie it in, i never once needed haki in a tube and fitting job.
@5:28 You don't show us the complete method of lowering the boards? by not showing us the complete method it would imply that you're system is harder to install, more time consuming and less safe than your trying imply.
No handles on the decks and when you go to throw them out from the next bay, because the end of the decks have folding hooks, the boards don't catch onto the transoms and they fall through the bay. When you do it with 3 metre decks, they nearly take you with them and if they land on someone's noggin, then they're most certainly certainly brown bread. Awful stuff to use.
This is getting out of hand, why not just build the bloody building out of scaffolding, this is like building 2 buildings at the same time or building 1 building to fix another building. Watch the Asians, they build it out of bamboo, what do you Brits have that resembles bamboo, oh shit please don't say recycled bamboo LOL! Hey Govner do you want a riser or an intermediate rail next to the standard, wha, ya don't know, ask that bloody geezer over there he looks like he went to school.
iv used this offshore, works great there in a wearhouse, try it underdeck offshore where the I beams are never at the point you want to put your dropper, load of crap, tube and fitting you can't beat it.
Hey HAKI.
Just curios.
Is that ALLUMINIUM? It looks very light. I'm amazed at how you built out n down wards.
I'm amazed that all that stress past the Fulcrum. point on those 2 beams. with no spur.
and lowering those boards is unbelievable.
That is aluminium indeed!
About 20K in plant for a 1 lift dropper, about 1.5K in plant using tube and fitting for the same application which has a proven track record in over 80 years of use. Don't get me wrong clever system indeed, but considering the vast majority of the UK's scaffold erectors are SME organisations with the emphasis on small sub 500k T/O they simply cannot afford to invest in expensive system scaffolds for niche applications whereas their bread and butter is in traditional Tube and Fitting.
You see this is the major issue with system as oppose to T and F. You have limitless scope in T and F due to no pre-set component sizes.
I've seen specialised one off system components made for one off applications due to nothing available as a stock item, this is a massive cost to the end user, in T and F, cut the tubes to suit and job done. This is why you will never see system readily used in general street work scaffolding as it costs too much and lacks versatility. Absolutely fine for large big square box builds, but useless when your have to erect in gaps sub 2ft wide with buildings that are not true or twisted with age.
This is so NOT your standard scaffolding system. So many specialized and well thought out components. Sure requires a substantial investment.
Why so many damn steps just to hang 1 damn bay!?!
Lol!
Infill plates are cool. I dont see why you bother setting up the "safe" zone befor continuing the frame since you need to be tied off anyways. Just adding time. Unless your dealing with ppl afraid of heights I guess.
try dropping 8 lifts down a leg underdeck offshore, no way this crap works, very ristricted to bay sizes, you just cant move it 3 inches one way or another, iv used it, every haki sacffold i needed tube and fitting to tie it in, i never once needed haki in a tube and fitting job.
Continuing on it's pretty cool stuff actually
Looks very light.
Did you ever go too boddingdton
lmfaooo yeah why?
What sort of training does this need?
Too much. 50 billion different parts.
First thing you need is a drawing 🙈..gone is the thought process that I loved .
Wow what a great way to eliminate the hazard! Times have really change.
@5:28 You don't show us the complete method of lowering the boards? by not showing us the complete method it would imply that you're system is harder to install, more time consuming and less safe than your trying imply.
No handles on the decks and when you go to throw them out from the next bay, because the end of the decks have folding hooks, the boards don't catch onto the transoms and they fall through the bay. When you do it with 3 metre decks, they nearly take you with them and if they land on someone's noggin, then they're most certainly certainly brown bread. Awful stuff to use.
Give me tube and fitting any day!
Wonder what my man's day rate is. I love him he's the bollox
Worst system to use. Surprised no one as died using that rubbish.
I love him
What a great video, well explained.
Haki is the way forward.......
Very expensive though
Great looking system
Who in their right mind would buy this garbage?
i'd rather just use tube n fitting there's too much fannying about with this system
Phil
Nice
Peri is so much easier to work with
What rubbish
Hate the stuff
wait a minute HAKI????????? is this one piece????????????
This is getting out of hand, why not just build the bloody building out of scaffolding, this is like building 2 buildings at the same time or building 1 building to fix another building. Watch the Asians, they build it out of bamboo, what do you Brits have that resembles bamboo, oh shit please don't say recycled bamboo LOL! Hey Govner do you want a riser or an intermediate rail next to the standard, wha, ya don't know, ask that bloody geezer over there he looks like he went to school.
Nice