@@stewie7338 Similar but the exact opposite in meaning. He said he tries not to spread falsehoods. Which is funny because you seem like you are trying to spread some false information which is easily fact checked to be wrong.
Two tier policing has always existed. How many black and ethnic minorities are subjected to regular stop and search? How many black men have died in police custody ? This wasnt an issue for the far right ?!
Exactly. Racial profiling for 50 + years, and not a peep from the Right. Beaten up and killed by police. But white people held accountable... Is far too much for them. Started during covid where those same people were told to put on their masks, and they lost their minds
Exactly this, gang members , ex or current are subjected to stops or judgement s repeatedly because of their history, same as any ex offender....but far right protesters, which include football hoologans, are shocked the police are on their case?
It's only an issue for them when they're not benefiting from the disparity. They know exactly what they're doing making those arguments in blatant bad faith
So these nasty people are scared because they've discovered that repeating and endorsing wicked lies intended to put the lives of innocent people in danger might have consequences for them as well as for the targetted victims? Let's all enjoy this!
Nick Lowles of HNH shared wicked lies about a woman being attacked with acid from the Muslim community. What were the consequences? Two tier justice. Two tier society. Two tier Keir.
@@gregoryjames165 You mean the one where he apologises if the report was not true. Kindly explain how this amounts to "two tier justice". Exactly what law has been broken here?
@@Wiggle65F me. You didn't just not get what Orwell was saying you actually saw the complete opposite of it! Education really and totally failed you!!!!!!
@@TimmyRipkey-zj7sg it's horrific, but that's a religious-motivated violence, not state-carried gen oh cide. there's a difference between sproadic violence done by civilian extremist groups and a full blown gen oh cide campaign done by the state (as in gaza).
@@adblocker276Clarkson's Farm highlighted this. JC was careful to post signs saying "bull in field", rather than "Danger - bull". You have to warn people of a danger, without saying it's a danger. This is why electricity substations often have signs saying "danger of death", rather than "you risk being killed if you trespass in the substation". It's a legal minefield. We should have signs saying "This is private property. There is dangerous stuff / animals loose, if you get hurt trespassing, it's not my fault, it's yours". Much like Mike's "if you don't want to be accused of spreading racial hate, don't spread racial hate"
@@neilgodwin6531 It wouldn't usually make a difference to liability. Typically, if someone is legally on your property (e.g. a postman) then if they get bitten by your dog, or gored by your bull, then you'd generally be liable whatever sign you put up. That you've warned someone of a risk helps your defence in demonstrating you considered others and made them aware, which will help to some extent if you're arguing it was fundamentally their fault for being provocative to the animal, or acting carelessly or recklessly. But if you know your animal is ill-tempered to strangers and potentially dangerous and you've not taken action to limit the potential risk to others (advising them isn't enough) that would be a more important factor putting liability on you than the sign. If you had a sign saying 'Beware of dog' or 'Danger - bull' then it's likely the claimant's legal team would use that as a springboard to ask if you already considered the animal dangerous, or had evidence from past behaviour that they were - but they'd almost certainly ask that anyway, sign or not. And the sign wouldn't indemnify you if you knew the animal was dangerous. When it comes to trespassers, you would not normally be liable if they're injured - if you've put up a sign warning that there's potential danger from an animal then you're pretty much covered. In those cases, the wording of the sign or the known behaviour of the animal usually matters a lot less; the trespasser shouldn't have been there, and they were given reasonable warning of the risk attached to trespassing. Just be careful if you deliberately kept the animal as a 'guard' though, as at that point you could reasonably have expected people to be injured by it and so liability may cycle back towards you as a result. I agree it's a minefield, but the basic premise is that the law is the law, and whatever you put on the sign (e.g. it's not my fault, it's yours) doesn't change that. However, warning people of a risk will generally be in your favour more often than not should an animal you're responsible for harm someone.
These sorts of disclaimers are pretty weak stuff, to be honest. They pop that on Twitter, and then spout the most dishonest, venomous and egregious stuff regardless. And to be fair, why are they even saying it? It’s SUPPOSED to be true. Saying that “well, y’know, I thought it was true” is such a weird thing to say in that profession.
yea the disclaimers which need to be stated is laughable , those of us with a brain know it's to comply with the crazy ideology from the left , as the left like censorship
DISCLAIMER: If you read this you owe the author of this disclaimer a one time viewing fee of 399.90 €. Repeated readings' fees double with each viewing. Non-compliance with this binding contract will result in a one time 100'000 € penalty, due at the time of reading. Repeated offenders will be prostituted. You are hereby notified you are not permitted to not read this disclaimer.
@@adblocker276At what point did we stop looking at people as individuals, and stereotype them according to their age? No one questions this trend. I'm 67, and nothing I read about "boomers" applies to me. Certainly not the Facebook thing, which my younger relatives engaged in, but not myself. Nor did I buy a house for £2.50 and a shopping voucher at the age of 18. I did get full student grant, though
Your so right, all just words to disarm certain people from commentating, this channel is so righteous, if your at the pointy end of media you have to post first and fast and sometimes you dont have all the info, very easy for channels like this to sit back and get the facts then pull them apart!
Dear Lawrence Fox ,we have seen the mettle of British. They looted Lush for Bath bombs and Greggs for Steak bakes and one fell flat on her face pushing a shopping trolly at the police. P.S it didnt happen in Wales and Scotland.
Disclaimer after they almost setting the whole country on fire? 🤨 maybe holding them to account and legal action would make them more accountable next time 🙄😒
The same people creaming themselves when Just Stop Oil protestors get long prison sentences. People looting and setting fire to buildings over the last few weeks get prison sentences and the same people are up in arms. They want two tier policing but just in a way that benefits them it seems.
@@gordonstrong5232 Which part was wrong, all straight from Starmlins mouth! Are you upset that you've waited for a Labour Government all your life and they've fucked it up!
I don’t why commentators keep viewing these people as ideological… their number one desire is to make as much money from these topics while they can knowing the establishment won’t make them financially accountable, Grifters.
@@Mchelsea2924That’s a childish, lazy and rude reply to a fairly reasonable question. Imagine yourself replying in that exact same way to someone’s face 😅
Except the channel isn't really making any money - it's running annual losses into the tens of millions of pounds. The talking heads on the channel may be motivated by their salaries, but the channel itself is clearly an ideological project, and they're comfortable aligning themselves with the party line over there. It's not like any of them are the opposite in their personal life and betraying everything they stand for to rake in the cash; they are ideologically compatible with the channel. To paraphrase/borrow from Popehat's Rule of Goats (he was talking about those doing similar online but cloaked in excessive "irony"): Swiving goats for the money is still bestiality
@@timvella1817 Jack the Ripper was in the 19th century, I don't think anyone is going to be inspired to riot over his crimes now. I can't believe you think that's actually comparable 😂
Actually lions were indigenous to the UK around 14,000 years ago. That was also a time when the last truly indigenous people existed here. But like lions the actual true indigenous people of the UK haven't existed for over 4,500 years!
Yep, clearly "censorship " is bad, but spreading bullship is worse. In an ideal world there would be no law against say, robbing a house, but unfortunately some people do, so there is a law.
Just because you didnt intend to cause something, doesnt mean it didnt cause it. If you commit a crime but didnt intend to, then that doesnt make it not a crime - I'd probably consider sacking the legal advisers that devised this statement
This is why I wanted Starmer as PM he has a prosecutorial mindset & he's no coward; the Tories and their shills have had it easy for far too long and now it's time the Brexiteers felt the full force of English law, that they argued had been lost to us along with our Sovereignty.
I keep seeing on all sorts of social media, depicting a lion with the tag 'its about time to wake the British Lion'! Can i respectfully just point out that the lion is not native to the British Isles, so that means it must be an immigrant 🤷🏻. And there was me thinking the far right were against immigrants 🤔
Yep, aside from the 3 African lions, the England flag depicts a cross from a religion centred around a middle eastern refugee, and St George was a Turkish immigrant. I'm sure these ironies will be entirely lost on the Yaxley Lennon brigade though 😂
These clowns that claim to be 'news' channels should mind their responsibilities. Otherwise, they might find themselves in the same situation as the state radio stations in Rwanda.
I'm not sure that these disclaimers, particularly coming after the fact, have any legitimacy in law. They should be tested. And I hope that they will be in the not too distant future.
No, they've been listenening to their mate Bob from the pub whose girlfriends father swears this will work because he heard some lawyer on the tv say it (at least, he thinks he was a lawyer)
The point is that they are primarily hired bought and paid for propagansists and hired guns to PUSH a narrative whilst PRETENDING to be journalists and are indeed quite the opposite of journalists. Propaganda is not based on truth.
Journalists, ha, good one. Journalism requires work. Much easier to write and say the first thing that pops in their heads. For media companies, it's cheaper to sensationalise and make stuff up, get the hard of thinking riled up, equals easy money.
@@duffblimp9888 I think you may have missed my sarcasm. By suggesting a "journalist" "try doing some journalism" I'm implying they have never yet done so.
"The lawyers for Rachel Maddow argued that she does not provide factual news and her audience does not expect her to provide them with facts". They all use his argument
As a man of Ghanaian origin living in the UK, I find it quite fascinating watching Nana Akua (who’s also Ghanaian herself) saying the sort of stuff she does on GB News. I’m always so shocked whenever I listen to her speak. Does she not realise the kind of mindless propaganda she helps propagate may put her or her family in harms way by these rioters?
Especially when Nana told us that unvaccinated people should be put in prison. What a nasty thing to say, and now time has passed and it is quite clear that the unvaccinated people were correct not to trust the UK government I feel she really should apologise.
Aww, good old Lozza, he’s always got something absolutely hideous to say about someone. I long for the day when he is his own subject, but I fear it will never come.
@@jamesbreen8416 Rome wasn't built in a day, pick your battles etc. I'm just reveling in the moment we're having after 14 years under a lawless, corrupt government.seeing these thugs get the book thrown at them and the charlatans scrambling to cover their ass is a desperately needed breath of fresh air. Of course there are big questions still to be asked. Light will be thrown on this in due course, but for now it feels like the Sheriff is in gonna clean up this town :)
There are a lot of people spreading racial hatred and incitement online these days it seems. They need to be held accountable and so do the platforms hosting them.
Not long after the film 1917 came out because an ethnically Asian British actor playing an Indian soldier had an on screen appearance & maybe two or four lines that Foxy says could have “gone to a white actor” & that it “wasn’t historically accurate” to have brown people in WW1. Being apart of the British Empire, Indians were drafted in 1914 & was historically accurate as was his regimental uniform.
Isn't it interesting that the "voices of the people" and the "voices of common sense" are turning around and saying "it's not our fault, it's the plebs fault for being thick and easily led" I believe the term is: throwing someone under the bus is applicable
Usually an apology is issued after a false claim is made not before. In the case of fox, wooton and the other one, they know it's bs hence the disclaimer. OFWAT should issue a warning 'what you are about to see could be complete BS' before airing. I'd be happy with that.
As general advice, it's a great idea to _not_ go on to those charming folks' twitter etc pages since they earn money through "engagement" on those platforms.
Er, the answer is in the description. Right as opposed to Left. So how could It be the centre ground? Maybe you should rephrase it. Right wing= Nob heads.
You can usually tell someone is racist when you only get angry when a person with immigrant heritage that is non white commits a crime. Not a word was said when it was established the Leicester Square knife attacker was very English and very white and was stoped by a brown man born in Pakistan. Not a word about Beverly Alit or Lucy Letby killing so many babies between them.
@@Barry-m6j Yes indeed - this is spreading false information and fake news stirring up hate against the English - racial hatred. The law has to apply both ways
@@duffblimp9888 Where I come from 'being chorved' was a kind of bittersweet irritation usually by a sibling. It's kind of like 'hate-watching' - entertaining yet enraging at the same time. I get it though. It rapidly palls
I find Wooten's post objectively offensive ... the tragedy that occurred was not a contrived / orchestrated political or terrorist act , it would appear it was the act of someone mentally / emotionally vulnerable and given the state of mental health provisions after the last 15 years of underfunding, maybe just maybe if the over-arching facts and realities of a decade and half of Tory cuts had not been manifest then possibly this may have been avoidable ... That said am a die hard proponent of free speech and an equally fierce proponent of giving someone the back of a working man's hand when merited ... so Wooten can say what he likes , as long as he accepts the consequences of offending people
You notice the left doesn't have to make disclaimers like this only the right, why is it that the right is so dishonest to their own side. The lack of respect is baffling.
Be careful, Novara. At present, this legislation is on your side... One day, you might find it being used *against* you. Freefom of expression of opinion is crucial to democracy.
@@sajadazaman9384 *legally* how do you define "hatred", exactly? Thing is, the govt can simply decide to define "hatred" as *whatever they want to* Many would define Socialism as "spreading hatred" Can you not see that we are on the slippery slope .. ?
@@Tao_Tology *I* don't believe I do that. Nonetheless you have a very naive worldview if you believe that State Censorship won't one day be used against *YOU* my friend.
@@tobymaltby6036 "I don't believe..." And that matters not a jot. 😄 Look at you _desperate_ to r try to find someway to criticise 'charged and jailed for violence and inciting hatred'.
It's the Streisand effect. By posting that worthless disclaimer, they are drawing attention to the fact that they have earlier posts that they believe may constitute an offense and require a disclaimer.
"If it makes me look good, then I meant to do it. If it makes me look bad, then I didn't mean to do it."
😂
100%
It will be those pesky moral compasses again.
Murdoch "school of journalism" . When did facts ever matter there.
Yes noting that Michael ends the video with a similar disclaimer.. uh oh spadoodios.
@stewie7338 No he doesn't.
@@Dantianblue You didn't watch till the end then.
@@stewie7338 Similar but the exact opposite in meaning. He said he tries not to spread falsehoods. Which is funny because you seem like you are trying to spread some false information which is easily fact checked to be wrong.
@@greghampton7457 Hi Greg - no I'm not I'm being objective. Where is your fact checker?
Two tier policing has always existed. How many black and ethnic minorities are subjected to regular stop and search? How many black men have died in police custody ? This wasnt an issue for the far right ?!
Exactly. Racial profiling for 50 + years, and not a peep from the Right. Beaten up and killed by police. But white people held accountable... Is far too much for them. Started during covid where those same people were told to put on their masks, and they lost their minds
Exactly this, gang members , ex or current are subjected to stops or judgement s repeatedly because of their history, same as any ex offender....but far right protesters, which include football hoologans, are shocked the police are on their case?
Thank you
It's only an issue for them when they're not benefiting from the disparity. They know exactly what they're doing making those arguments in blatant bad faith
Nor was it an issue for the 'silent' white majority, for the last 70+ years.
So these nasty people are scared because they've discovered that repeating and endorsing wicked lies intended to put the lives of innocent people in danger might have consequences for them as well as for the targetted victims? Let's all enjoy this!
I really do hope that, when foxy ends up in prison that the boys don't abuse him, too much.
Nick Lowles of HNH shared wicked lies about a woman being attacked with acid from the Muslim community. What were the consequences? Two tier justice. Two tier society. Two tier Keir.
@@gregoryjames165 You mean the one where he apologises if the report was not true. Kindly explain how this amounts to "two tier justice". Exactly what law has been broken here?
You agree Nick Lowells needs to be in prison?
@@timvella1817 If you don't answer my question, I won't answer yours.
Lawrence Fox was beaten in the London Mayoral election by Count Binface😂
🤣
😂
Brilliant Binface
binface has also prob beaten swp candidates...
@@jaysomastandup Probably not covered up rape allegations either
Ofcom have allowed them all to get away with this, so they are also guilty by the fact they did not do the one thing that they exist to do.
💯🎯
ofcom is tory and russian owned and paid for time for it to be replaced.
Ofcom is a complete joke and not fit for purpose.
Nobody should be surprised the crap that comes out on GB not news
What has ofcom got to do with individuals’ x-twatter posts?
Why are these media people not prosecuted? They are not different from those people causing mayhem.
Ok Mr Orwell!
I mean they're obviously worried about it if they've all been told to post this boilerplate statement of innocence
@@Wiggle65oh dear. Not really understanding relevance are you?
@@Wiggle65F me. You didn't just not get what Orwell was saying you actually saw the complete opposite of it!
Education really and totally failed you!!!!!!
@@keldsleepnot7961 Typical left wing comment, I dont agree therefore insult. And you call me uneducated!
Same argument to not condemn genocide!!!!
Yes the genocide on Hindus in Bangladesh is a disgrace
@@TimmyRipkey-zj7sg it's horrific, but that's a religious-motivated violence, not state-carried gen oh cide. there's a difference between sproadic violence done by civilian extremist groups and a full blown gen oh cide campaign done by the state (as in gaza).
@@byunbaekhyun2283 You don't think gaza and israel is religious motivated violence?
@@TimmyRipkey-zj7sg What religion was Golda Meir?
Was Native American violence founded on anti- Christian sentiment? Were the Maori or the Mau Mau anti-Christians? FfS read something.
None of my posts describing Laurence Fox as a racism-provocateur and privileged piss-poor actor are known by its author to be untrue.
The 'legal' disclaimer would be a prosecution's dream come true. 😅
It’s like how a “beware of dog” sign on your door could actually be a liability instead of legal defence
@@adblocker276Clarkson's Farm highlighted this.
JC was careful to post signs saying "bull in field", rather than "Danger - bull".
You have to warn people of a danger, without saying it's a danger. This is why electricity substations often have signs saying "danger of death", rather than "you risk being killed if you trespass in the substation".
It's a legal minefield. We should have signs saying "This is private property. There is dangerous stuff / animals loose, if you get hurt trespassing, it's not my fault, it's yours".
Much like Mike's "if you don't want to be accused of spreading racial hate, don't spread racial hate"
@@neilgodwin6531 It wouldn't usually make a difference to liability. Typically, if someone is legally on your property (e.g. a postman) then if they get bitten by your dog, or gored by your bull, then you'd generally be liable whatever sign you put up. That you've warned someone of a risk helps your defence in demonstrating you considered others and made them aware, which will help to some extent if you're arguing it was fundamentally their fault for being provocative to the animal, or acting carelessly or recklessly. But if you know your animal is ill-tempered to strangers and potentially dangerous and you've not taken action to limit the potential risk to others (advising them isn't enough) that would be a more important factor putting liability on you than the sign.
If you had a sign saying 'Beware of dog' or 'Danger - bull' then it's likely the claimant's legal team would use that as a springboard to ask if you already considered the animal dangerous, or had evidence from past behaviour that they were - but they'd almost certainly ask that anyway, sign or not. And the sign wouldn't indemnify you if you knew the animal was dangerous.
When it comes to trespassers, you would not normally be liable if they're injured - if you've put up a sign warning that there's potential danger from an animal then you're pretty much covered. In those cases, the wording of the sign or the known behaviour of the animal usually matters a lot less; the trespasser shouldn't have been there, and they were given reasonable warning of the risk attached to trespassing. Just be careful if you deliberately kept the animal as a 'guard' though, as at that point you could reasonably have expected people to be injured by it and so liability may cycle back towards you as a result.
I agree it's a minefield, but the basic premise is that the law is the law, and whatever you put on the sign (e.g. it's not my fault, it's yours) doesn't change that. However, warning people of a risk will generally be in your favour more often than not should an animal you're responsible for harm someone.
The #1 job of a journalist is to verify their stories before releasing them.
These sorts of disclaimers are pretty weak stuff, to be honest. They pop that on Twitter, and then spout the most dishonest, venomous and egregious stuff regardless. And to be fair, why are they even saying it? It’s SUPPOSED to be true. Saying that “well, y’know, I thought it was true” is such a weird thing to say in that profession.
yea the disclaimers which need to be stated is laughable , those of us with a brain know it's to comply with the crazy ideology from the left , as the left like censorship
DISCLAIMER: If you read this you owe the author of this disclaimer a one time viewing fee of 399.90 €. Repeated readings' fees double with each viewing. Non-compliance with this binding contract will result in a one time 100'000 € penalty, due at the time of reading. Repeated offenders will be prostituted. You are hereby notified you are not permitted to not read this disclaimer.
It’s like the trend where boomers on Facebook were posting saying I do not give Facebook permission to use my images- lmao.
@@adblocker276At what point did we stop looking at people as individuals, and stereotype them according to their age?
No one questions this trend.
I'm 67, and nothing I read about "boomers" applies to me. Certainly not the Facebook thing, which my younger relatives engaged in, but not myself.
Nor did I buy a house for £2.50 and a shopping voucher at the age of 18. I did get full student grant, though
Your so right, all just words to disarm certain people from commentating, this channel is so righteous, if your at the pointy end of media you have to post first and fast and sometimes you dont have all the info, very easy for channels like this to sit back and get the facts then pull them apart!
I'm a journalist, everything I say is fiction. -Sun 'Pullitzer Prize' Tzu
I don't remember reading this in the book. 😂😂😂
@@barbthegreat586 Yeah, the version Andre is quoting from was only available to Sun Tzu's patreon supporters.
Dan Wootton, Bev Turner and Laurence Fox are the bottom of the barrel
Bev Turner has more balls than any news presenter.
@@happyapple4269 She's a bloke pretending to be a gal? Imagine that on GB Spews.
@@tonydaddario4706 Well, by your values, you just committed a hate crime. I know, it only counts if it's "the other side"
Where as the left can say what they like.
@@happyapple4269
True.
Dear Lawrence Fox ,we have seen the mettle of British. They looted Lush for Bath bombs and Greggs for Steak bakes and one fell flat on her face pushing a shopping trolly at the police.
P.S it didnt happen in Wales and Scotland.
Jeezauce, the smugness at the end. 😅
Any opinion on the Leeds riot?
@@Tao_Tology Do the EDL have a Welsh or Scottish branch ? Lol
No-one cares about Wales or Scotland
@@johnreilly9452 Patriotic Alternative have been active in Wales.
The "British Lion" must have come over on a small boat as an illegal immigrant.
Imagine that 🤣
there was a land bridge to europe once
@@Derek_Garnham excellent, it must have come from the French Serengeti near leon 🦁
And Saint George is Greek..
Not as good as blonde hair, blue eyed Saint George, patron Saint of England being Turkish. What does 'man of the people' Nigel Farage think?
Thr Toad waffles his way through life . Man of the people with his tweed jacket and beer in other hand.
Careful. If you mess with Laurence Fox, he'll start singing, and then you'll die of second hand embarrassment.
😂 very good. 😂
I am willing to die from embarrassment.
Laurance Fox . Awful actor , can't get a gig . Spends his time being bitter and posting his dross .
Disclaimer after they almost setting the whole country on fire? 🤨 maybe holding them to account and legal action would make them more accountable next time 🙄😒
The same people creaming themselves when Just Stop Oil protestors get long prison sentences. People looting and setting fire to buildings over the last few weeks get prison sentences and the same people are up in arms. They want two tier policing but just in a way that benefits them it seems.
So much racism 😢on gb news and talk tv they are stirring so much hate its scaring me as a muslim person of colour
Don't worry, Starmlin has said he'll look after you. You've got a free pass, crack on!
It’s scary for any rational human being 😂
@@Wiggle65 F O bot.
@@gordonstrong5232 Which part was wrong, all straight from Starmlins mouth! Are you upset that you've waited for a Labour Government all your life and they've fucked it up!
@@Wiggle65me when I lie:
I don't blame them covering their ass with the 1984 groupthink that's going on in the UK!
I don’t why commentators keep viewing these people as ideological… their number one desire is to make as much money from these topics while they can knowing the establishment won’t make them financially accountable, Grifters.
How do you know this?
@@timvella1817 it’s common knowledge duh….
@@Mchelsea2924That’s a childish, lazy and rude reply to a fairly reasonable question. Imagine yourself replying in that exact same way to someone’s face 😅
True
Except the channel isn't really making any money - it's running annual losses into the tens of millions of pounds. The talking heads on the channel may be motivated by their salaries, but the channel itself is clearly an ideological project, and they're comfortable aligning themselves with the party line over there. It's not like any of them are the opposite in their personal life and betraying everything they stand for to rake in the cash; they are ideologically compatible with the channel.
To paraphrase/borrow from Popehat's Rule of Goats (he was talking about those doing similar online but cloaked in excessive "irony"): Swiving goats for the money is still bestiality
They've got nothing to worry about ,I'm sure Rupert will protect them , he's such an upstanding member of society 🤭
They're becoming parodies of themselves
Why has Katie Hopkins not been arrested??? she "named" the killer! (utterly made up name).
Why has the Hate not Hope bloke not been arrested ???
He did far worse than any of the people mentioned in these comments …
You think that's illegal? Seek help. How many people should be jailed for naming jack the ripper? Makes me laugh that you lot think you are educated.
Why are you a 2 tier fascist? What about Nick Lowells?
@@timvella1817 Jack the Ripper was in the 19th century, I don't think anyone is going to be inspired to riot over his crimes now.
I can't believe you think that's actually comparable 😂
@@timvella1817 Jeremy Vine got £75k because someone called him a nonce in a tweet, you'd be surprised
Lions aren’t an indigenous species in the UK. This immigration thing is confusing to racist.
😂😂😂
Actually lions were indigenous to the UK around 14,000 years ago. That was also a time when the last truly indigenous people existed here. But like lions the actual true indigenous people of the UK haven't existed for over 4,500 years!
@@keldsleepnot7961 hey what are you saying is there is no truly indigenous people in the world or that just here.
@@87mrreynoldsjust here of course
Neither is Dan Wootton.
Out-of-work journalist interviews out-of-work actor on RUclips, the Devil really does make work for idle hands.
'Resting' Darling... 'resting'
Please believe me when I say I do not know when I am lying to you.
That's the MO of all politicians to be honest
Isn't that a buffoon johnson quote? Sounds a lot like one to me lol!
They are the most weird and psychopathic creatures of all time
Spiteful mutants? I agree.
Irony lol
On par with console warriors of the Sony super fan variety, one might say. 😏
Salty 🧂 you like whom ?
listen to the words you are using
A journalist should only publish things they KNOW to be true.
If they do now know that then the word Allegedly must be clearly used and accentuated.
Like the BBC?
Like Novara Media?
Some people say: "Write whatever you want."
Some people say all options are sh1te and there is only an illusion of choice
So why are you and Novara not criticising Nick Lowles then, let alone demanding his prosecution? Clear double-standards, methinks.
It’s clear from the wording of their disclaimers that it’s due to fear of prosecution under the Online Safety Act 2023.
Yep, clearly "censorship " is bad, but spreading bullship is worse. In an ideal world there would be no law against say, robbing a house, but unfortunately some people do, so there is a law.
It's going to be funny watching these people argue in a court of law that they are genuinely stupid and therefore not liable
Fox News has successfully argued in court that it is entertainment, not news, and so nobody should take them seriously.
Then don't post it in the first place!
So you want to restrict speech?
@@johnno8586hate speech and misinformation certainly.
Just because you didnt intend to cause something, doesnt mean it didnt cause it. If you commit a crime but didnt intend to, then that doesnt make it not a crime - I'd probably consider sacking the legal advisers that devised this statement
Words are not crimes.
@@thedave7760Say something racist, and then see if your words are not a crime. I guarantee you'll end up in court 🤦
“See how they run, like pigs from a gun, see how they fly” John Lennon 😂😂😂
This gives ever more reason to why we need media reform.
In a democracy everyone is accountable.
This is why I wanted Starmer as PM he has a prosecutorial mindset & he's no coward; the Tories and their shills have had it easy for far too long and now it's time the Brexiteers felt the full force of English law, that they argued had been lost to us along with our Sovereignty.
I keep seeing on all sorts of social media, depicting a lion with the tag 'its about time to wake the British Lion'! Can i respectfully just point out that the lion is not native to the British Isles, so that means it must be an immigrant 🤷🏻. And there was me thinking the far right were against immigrants 🤔
Yep, aside from the 3 African lions, the England flag depicts a cross from a religion centred around a middle eastern refugee, and St George was a Turkish immigrant.
I'm sure these ironies will be entirely lost on the Yaxley Lennon brigade though 😂
Are metaphors native to the British Isles?
Yaxley Lennon’s mother was an immigrant.
These clowns that claim to be 'news' channels should mind their responsibilities. Otherwise, they might find themselves in the same situation as the state radio stations in Rwanda.
Fox should be expecting a knock on his door for that little rant... and Wootton for reposting it
I would have thought that Dan would have too much to worry about to stick his head up out of his basement
If Herr Starmer wasn’t having people arrested for what they say and think this wouldn’t be necessary.
I've had one of these disclaimer (as a laugh) on my Facebook page since forever. Guess what... It not legally recognised 😂
Think they have all been talking to their Lawyers lmao
I'm not sure that these disclaimers, particularly coming after the fact, have any legitimacy in law. They should be tested. And I hope that they will be in the not too distant future.
No, they've been listenening to their mate Bob from the pub whose girlfriends father swears this will work because he heard some lawyer on the tv say it (at least, he thinks he was a lawyer)
The roar of the British lion ….. lol …. Lions, mr fox….. are not fucking British ….. neither was St George …. 😂🤦🏻♂️
You can have a whole programme based 100% on facts as long as you are avoiding 90% of the issues.
Laurence Fox looks a homourless, malevolent Wallace after Gromit couldn't stand him any more and ran off.
Drugs or mental illness. He needs an intervention. From whom, I know not.
Don't insult Wallace! 🤣
Perhaps these folks are a bit worried now ? If so great!
Michael Walker is a proper journalist
Sucks that freedom of opinion is dead in UK now.
My advice to these journalists is that if they want to avoid repeating falsehoods then they should try doing some journalism.
The point is that they are primarily hired bought and paid for propagansists and hired guns to PUSH a narrative whilst PRETENDING to be journalists and are indeed quite the opposite of journalists. Propaganda is not based on truth.
Journalists, ha, good one. Journalism requires work. Much easier to write and say the first thing that pops in their heads. For media companies, it's cheaper to sensationalise and make stuff up, get the hard of thinking riled up, equals easy money.
@@duffblimp9888 I think you may have missed my sarcasm. By suggesting a "journalist" "try doing some journalism" I'm implying they have never yet done so.
@@pierssharpe7123 I had a feeling you may have been sarcastic, I was more just letting off steam about these parasites.
They should reap the nonsense they have been sowing!
The roar of the british lion came out a week after to counter protest these hooligans started throwing bricks
Absolutely brilliant Presenting... Clever & Made me laugh out loud...
Michael Walker I thank you...
Fox is lucky he hasnt been interviewed by the police.
Yet...
The last I read, he did a runner to Ireland on August 3rd.
@@jimbowers8278 AHH, became a migrant. Good good 👍
I think he has in past when he making outlandish comments about covid19 during pandemic when hundreds of thousands died
"The lawyers for Rachel Maddow argued that she does not provide factual news and her audience does not expect her to provide them with facts". They all use his argument
As a man of Ghanaian origin living in the UK, I find it quite fascinating watching Nana Akua (who’s also Ghanaian herself) saying the sort of stuff she does on GB News. I’m always so shocked whenever I listen to her speak. Does she not realise the kind of mindless propaganda she helps propagate may put her or her family in harms way by these rioters?
Especially when Nana told us that unvaccinated people should be put in prison. What a nasty thing to say, and now time has passed and it is quite clear that the unvaccinated people were correct not to trust the UK government I feel she really should apologise.
Aww, good old Lozza, he’s always got something absolutely hideous to say about someone. I long for the day when he is his own subject, but I fear it will never come.
How is it that Lawrence Fox is still walking free?
Dan Wootton a journalist seriously 😂😂😂😂😂😂
In all fairness to the bloke at least he doesn't think that you can farm concrete. He sets a far higher standard of blithering ignorance than some!!!!
Dan Wooton takes scraping the barrel to the next level when it comes to journalism. Or is it Martin Branning?
This is like the defence given in the Red Dwarf episode to save Rimmer.
X, the failed company.
X crement. Times Cartoon last week. Very clever.
Starmer being a human right lawyer might be handy after all.
Really he has not shown it so far look at his statements on gaza will prove it.
@@jamesbreen8416 Rome wasn't built in a day, pick your battles etc. I'm just reveling in the moment we're having after 14 years under a lawless, corrupt government.seeing these thugs get the book thrown at them and the charlatans scrambling to cover their ass is a desperately needed breath of fresh air. Of course there are big questions still to be asked. Light will be thrown on this in due course, but for now it feels like the Sheriff is in gonna clean up this town :)
There are a lot of people spreading racial hatred and incitement online these days it seems. They need to be held accountable and so do the platforms hosting them.
When did Foxy lose his fckng mind?
When Billie Piper stopped going down
Not long after the film 1917 came out because an ethnically Asian British actor playing an Indian soldier had an on screen appearance & maybe two or four lines that Foxy says could have “gone to a white actor” & that it “wasn’t historically accurate” to have brown people in WW1.
Being apart of the British Empire, Indians were drafted in 1914 & was historically accurate as was his regimental uniform.
When he appeared on Question Time in January 2020. Also before that, when Jeremy Vine was fawning over him when Fox sung live on his Channel 5 show.
He's been method acting as a psychopathic aristocrat since Gosford Park (slight spoilers).
"none of the cars I've stolen, or will steal, were or are knowingly owned by other people"
that'll get me off the hook!
Isn't it interesting that the "voices of the people" and the "voices of common sense" are turning around and saying "it's not our fault, it's the plebs fault for being thick and easily led"
I believe the term is: throwing someone under the bus is applicable
"Personal responsibility"
Usually an apology is issued after a false claim is made not before. In the case of fox, wooton and the other one, they know it's bs hence the disclaimer.
OFWAT should issue a warning 'what you are about to see could be complete BS' before airing. I'd be happy with that.
Hahahahaha they're out of ideas and know their "logic" can be undermined and contradicted
Free Free Palestine ❤️🖤🤍💚🇵🇸
Free Palestine.
Jew hater?
What does Palestine need to be free?
@@timvella1817because the people there have been occupied since 1947.
@@howlieMCFCWho are you standing up for?
A legitimate view … but you might be silenced if you agree with the video !!!
Of course Martin Branning would be in on this
Back track jack lol
As general advice, it's a great idea to _not_ go on to those charming folks' twitter etc pages since they earn money through "engagement" on those platforms.
The fact they have this caveat on their posts makes me suspicious of their reporting/opinion.
wo continues to listen to these two bullsh??ters😶
I never started😂
"Right wing" = normal people in the country, ie the centre ground.
Er, the answer is in the description. Right as opposed to Left. So how could It be the centre ground?
Maybe you should rephrase it. Right wing= Nob heads.
Why are right-wingers also so ashamed to be labelled as such?
Right wing = fighting a war in their own heads
This literally proves that they’re a bunch of grifters
Right wing headquarters “all propaganda staff, quick put this message up on your social media before you get in the 💩” 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Dan Wooten is a slimy worm 👍
You can usually tell someone is racist when you only get angry when a person with immigrant heritage that is non white commits a crime. Not a word was said when it was established the Leicester Square knife attacker was very English and very white and was stoped by a brown man born in Pakistan. Not a word about Beverly Alit or Lucy Letby killing so many babies between them.
The Leicester Square stabber was romanian
@@Barry-m6j Yes indeed - this is spreading false information and fake news stirring up hate against the English - racial hatred. The law has to apply both ways
And nothing about Irish Travellers (pikey).
@@Barry-m6j
Let’s pretend he’s not a member of the so called master race😅
@@keithwilliams744 the irony of inaccurate words on these comments. You may say what you like as long as it is the agreed right thing to say,
So there is people out here that want all speech , comments and movement censored and controlled .
Because free speech is being curtailed ? So yes people are worried they will be imprisoned for " opinions " and you can't see a problem with that ?
"They're entertainers not journalists" - that nailed it really.
However, their idiotic audience believes it to be facts.
I'd get more entertainment watching paint dry.
@@duffblimp9888 Where I come from 'being chorved' was a kind of bittersweet irritation usually by a sibling. It's kind of like 'hate-watching' - entertaining yet enraging at the same time. I get it though. It rapidly palls
It's the equivalent of when people on youtube give financial advice and then say "not-finanical advice"
GB news types 😨🤡
Racism is the purpose of life in the UK not just a way of life🇬🇧
Like bamber bridge..?
I find Wooten's post objectively offensive ... the tragedy that occurred was not a contrived / orchestrated political or terrorist act , it would appear it was the act of someone mentally / emotionally vulnerable and given the state of mental health provisions after the last 15 years of underfunding, maybe just maybe if the over-arching facts and realities of a decade and half of Tory cuts had not been manifest then possibly this may have been avoidable ...
That said am a die hard proponent of free speech and an equally fierce proponent of giving someone the back of a working man's hand when merited ... so Wooten can say what he likes , as long as he accepts the consequences of offending people
You notice the left doesn't have to make disclaimers like this only the right, why is it that the right is so dishonest to their own side. The lack of respect is baffling.
from the same vein as "I'm not racist, but.........."
"Not a financial advisor " is not an adequate excuse for shady NFT or Crypto Bros and shouldn't be a get out clause for them either
Be careful, Novara. At present, this legislation is on your side... One day, you might find it being used *against* you.
Freefom of expression of opinion is crucial to democracy.
@@tobymaltby6036 Lol, sweetheart you don't get to spread hatred and incite violence.
But not spreading falsehood and hatred
@@sajadazaman9384 *legally* how do you define "hatred", exactly?
Thing is, the govt can simply decide to define "hatred" as *whatever they want to*
Many would define Socialism as "spreading hatred"
Can you not see that we are on the slippery slope .. ?
@@Tao_Tology *I* don't believe I do that.
Nonetheless you have a very naive worldview if you believe that State Censorship won't one day be used against *YOU* my friend.
@@tobymaltby6036 "I don't believe..."
And that matters not a jot.
😄
Look at you _desperate_ to r
try to find someway to criticise 'charged and jailed for violence and inciting hatred'.
The very fact that an individual or legal entity need to post a disclaimer means that they are in bad faith.
None of that would mean a thing in court
No wonder Billie Piper left him
Epistemology is something that the Dan Wootons of this world would never understand
The moment that you bring any kind of ology into it Wooton will hit confusion!!!
so wait... fox NEWS is not actually news, and instead is like "Saturday Night Live"? That was their argument? 🤯
(howsoever identified).. it's like Donald Sterling saying 'he went to his synagogue and prayed for magic'.😂😂😂😂
I wasn’t aware specifying a person’s religion and place of origin automatically constitutes identifying their race.
Yes but eventually you'l end up running to cover your backside
"I purposely remain ignorant so I technically have deniability"
"I don't fact check things so you can't say I'm lying"
In short, don't listen to them
It's the Streisand effect.
By posting that worthless disclaimer, they are drawing attention to the fact that they have earlier posts that they believe may constitute an offense and require a disclaimer.