How New Testament Manuscripts Are Discovered
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 авг 2019
- The Institute for New Testament Textual Research in Munster, Germany holds the official catalog of the New Testament manuscripts. If they don't know about it, New Testament scholars don't know about it.
We have partnered with them so that when we discover a manuscript, we send the images to them, then they give it a new catalog number and announce it to the world.
This process takes several months because there's a lot of things they have to sift through to make sure it really is a new manuscript. But manuscript discovery is not all archaeological work. Most of the work is done in libraries.
LEARN MORE: zondervanacademic.com/blog/ho...
![Finesse2Tymes - Pretty Ricky [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xIoP_mhYRT0/mqdefault.jpg)
Where I can read it?
"We do not have now-in our critical Greek texts or any translations-exactly what the authors of the New Testament wrote. Even if we did, we would not know it. There are many, many places in which the text of the New Testament is uncertain."
By Daniel Wallace, ~From the foreword of _Myths in New Testament Textual Criticism_ by Elijah Hixson and Peter Gurry.
I would use the same thing Richard Elliott Friedman who wrote the Bible and Bible with sources revealed approach with linguistics ,doublets people without cognitive dissidence could understand... Shalom may Allah Yahudah bless you... and yours...
I'm so glad I'm not no Christian or no religion
"1st and 2nd Hebrews", wow, what a foolish thing to say.
The folly lies in misunderstanding what he says .
@@arulsammymankondar30 sorry that you've misunderstood my comment: I know that he knows that there isn't a first or second Hebrews; I only pointed out how foolish it was for him to say it that way, that is because there are many young viewers on youtube who may misunderstand his careless comment.
@@dojofighting You are right when you say this.
Context. He was not speaking literally. Some people will criticize anything.
@@larrytruelove8659right, so many people in this comment section are willingly misunderstanding Dr Wallace
but that’s YT for you
Daniel Wallace~and many like him in the same field, can't and won't point you to a Bible (God's word in one volume) and declare it as inerrant or infallible, the final authority from the LORD.
What they really _believe_ about the Bible (God's word), is that it's lost to antiquity. Mr. Wallace and men like him, are a disgrace. He is a doubter of God's word, not a believer in it.
scripture has two ways is read it... its by the Letter or by the Spirit ... the letter is hollowed out as being DEATH and the spirit side too LIFE ... two different ways. one is by what we know, letter. we read it and it troubles us with trespass and other blasphemous things regarding God ... but this part is the first part ... the LETTER. after a while on the course we are lifted from the playing field and corrected.... and now we use Spirit.
first off we are unclean and made that way by a pact called the NAZARENE,,, where we are to remain unclean, and cant taste strong wine from the vine... and the vine is our chakra system...
The Bible is a recolection of meaningless, absurd and immoral stories. It doesn't matter who translated what. This guy looks very serious with a heavy air of authority, but his ego is something pathetic.
It mattered enough for you to comment though
@@HearGodsWord hahaha Amen.
That shows your ignorance
The Bible is likely the most important book ever known to mankind. It doesn't matter what your opinion is on the matter; this is an objective fact.
@@faithlessfather Amen