@@dcquenceironic, given how much he complains about science journalism. Yet he is promoting an a.i. video app that will help contribute to that misinformation
I think the Big Bang is a lot more complex than we realize. Cosmic inflation I think is a clue to something we aren't understanding about the origin of the universe. I like to think of it as a huge beautiful painting on a wall. Like a wall mural but only a very tiny postage stamp size of it is visible. You know there's a painting there and you know its fantastic but you can't tell what it is because you can only see a very small part. I think that's where we are in our knowledge of the universe.
Thank you Paul! The “interesting” thing to me is that a preponderance of the stuff we see (dark matter and energy) is not predicted by theory and not understood. This means it’s “possible” we are missing something fundamental. I agree we don’t want to be to quick to throw out our theories but let’s face it - dark stuff is humbling - the failure of Supersymmetry was humbling - but the beauty of science is that it’s mandatory that we admit we are dead wrong when the evidence compels. Thanks again.
You are not crazy, but the stars of galaxies are moving faster than they should from what is measurable and the light around clusters is bending more than it should, a lot more. Also, dark matter isn't the issue in the video, it's dark energy.
@@tune490 yes, dark energy, which also has not really been proven to exist. Obviously SOMETHING has to account for all of the missing mass and energy, but I’m hoping that in my lifetime something more concrete and interesting comes along than those two gap fillers.
@@CaptainBlaine Maybe you don't have to wait that long. If you do a search for: "A common eigenmode postulate and a Λ-only model," you might find a paper that shows that all matter and energy in the universe can be made out of the same stuff as spacetime itself. Sadly, the RUclips algorithm deletes comments with links in them, so you have to search for the article yourself. I wrote the paper and it seems to show that the universe might just be much older, if not eternal. Though I don't state it in the paper directly, it is related to the Casimir effect. The Hubble horizon only allows certain harmonic modes to exist. And if one of those modes just so happens to be the Planck mode. Then the model tells you the exact number of harmonic modes as well as the exact number of holographic spin states necessary to compute the universe. And it just so happens to be the 80th triangle-square number. Intriguingly, the prime factors seem to then give a combinatorial spectrum that seems to relate to the Higgs scale as well as all the mass scales of the fundamental particles in the standard model. And this is all from Spacetime. Curious, don't you think?
Very good point! If we have calibrated deep space distances based on presuming a nonexistent expansion from redshift data, then we may have overestimated distances based on a fictitious "fudge factor" we proposed as dark matter (WIMPS, weakly interacting massive particles). If propagation loss is responsible for the background redshift, the postulated "acceleration of expansion" of dark energy may just be the exponential increase in wavelength vs. loss of mass-energy in the photon. No age limit would then be imposed on a possible eternal primeval energetic substance from which the universe has evolved.
Science Journalism may be bad, but mainstream journalism is just pathetic and morally wrong. Especially political, especially about Trump! Love your channel Paul!
Yes, missed you. I have seen science, and, indeed, all human knowledge, compared to a huge edifice constantly being enlarged, where from time to time some part has to be renovated or altered, but the edifice remains.
Your videos have come a long way. My problem is that, this conundrum is not interesting and therefore is probably correct. Happens lots, and you know this Paul.
Do we have tunnel vision about assigning everything to particles (because quantum theories work very well). If gravity is the curvature of space then how can that be caused by particles anyway? Curving space surely is just curved space, not transmitted by some graviton particle?
Great video, I will be subscribing to this channel. I agree with other commenters, there is so much garbage out there that pretends to be scientific. Finding genuinely rigorous content such as yours is a breath of fresh air!
@@MattCarvin I know lol, but I'm a neuroscience student, and a total nerd, so I think all the little non-sensational stuff is actually super fascinating. Like, did you know that specialized astrocyte cells release glutamate? How cool is that?
💰💰 Just let him have it and ignore the sponsor I guess, it's free money for people we like. Though I wish channels were more selective with who they advertise, or at the very least included hints that the sponsor is bad, I've just learned to completely ignore them and guess/hope most people do by now.
@@DaFinkingOrk I don’t begrudge him the money but it’s just depressing to see him advertise the very technology that drowns out good channels like his own with soulless unconscious mass-produced blather distilled from the collective work of who knows how many real people.
Sorry, going straight into a long ad is too much. You might have a brilliant channel but i just dont think I can survive the journey ! Apologies again!
I am not interested in listening to ai video, the next things it will be generated ai scripts, and ai generated voice, and we wont know what real or not
Those AI "science channels" are soooo annoying! They ramble on about this or that & pull viewers away from excellent channels like this.
Big time. They should be banned. They just junk up the place.
They are very often giving bad information and click-bait crap too.
💯
@@dcquenceironic, given how much he complains about science journalism. Yet he is promoting an a.i. video app that will help contribute to that misinformation
If your cosmology has been broken please check your warranty and call customer service to schedule for repair or replacement.
I think the Big Bang is a lot more complex than we realize. Cosmic inflation I think is a clue to something we aren't understanding about the origin of the universe. I like to think of it as a huge beautiful painting on a wall. Like a wall mural but only a very tiny postage stamp size of it is visible. You know there's a painting there and you know its fantastic but you can't tell what it is because you can only see a very small part. I think that's where we are in our knowledge of the universe.
Toddler galaxies have to be the most chaotic...
Missed you here, Dr. Sutter. Welcome back.
Cool vid. I prefer the term "mistaken" to "stupid" though.
Another great video, you're an awesome science explainer dude, Paul!
Not being invited to specific parties is often the surest indicator of integrity. Not just within science….. hint hint.
I'm all for galaxies with bigger bursts. It sure would explain a lot!
Always nice to have you tone down the sensationalism.
Thank you Paul! The “interesting” thing to me is that a preponderance of the stuff we see (dark matter and energy) is not predicted by theory and not understood. This means it’s “possible” we are missing something fundamental. I agree we don’t want to be to quick to throw out our theories but let’s face it - dark stuff is humbling - the failure of Supersymmetry was humbling - but the beauty of science is that it’s mandatory that we admit we are dead wrong when the evidence compels. Thanks again.
Another great video. You should have 10X as many subscribers.
Truly excellent, Paul. Another ‘Big Banger’ 😊
it's a fractal, The universe is bigging and banging at the centre of every galaxy all the time,
a great talk by an interesting guy
Call me crazy, but I don’t think we should be basing ideas of the formation of the universe on dark matter that hasn’t yet been proven to exist.
You are not crazy, but the stars of galaxies are moving faster than they should from what is measurable and the light around clusters is bending more than it should, a lot more. Also, dark matter isn't the issue in the video, it's dark energy.
@@tune490 yes, dark energy, which also has not really been proven to exist. Obviously SOMETHING has to account for all of the missing mass and energy, but I’m hoping that in my lifetime something more concrete and interesting comes along than those two gap fillers.
@@CaptainBlaine Maybe you don't have to wait that long. If you do a search for: "A common eigenmode postulate and a Λ-only model," you might find a paper that shows that all matter and energy in the universe can be made out of the same stuff as spacetime itself. Sadly, the RUclips algorithm deletes comments with links in them, so you have to search for the article yourself. I wrote the paper and it seems to show that the universe might just be much older, if not eternal. Though I don't state it in the paper directly, it is related to the Casimir effect. The Hubble horizon only allows certain harmonic modes to exist. And if one of those modes just so happens to be the Planck mode. Then the model tells you the exact number of harmonic modes as well as the exact number of holographic spin states necessary to compute the universe. And it just so happens to be the 80th triangle-square number. Intriguingly, the prime factors seem to then give a combinatorial spectrum that seems to relate to the Higgs scale as well as all the mass scales of the fundamental particles in the standard model. And this is all from Spacetime. Curious, don't you think?
Very good point! If we have calibrated deep space distances based on presuming a nonexistent expansion from redshift data, then we may have overestimated distances based on a fictitious "fudge factor" we proposed as dark matter (WIMPS, weakly interacting massive particles). If propagation loss is responsible for the background redshift, the postulated "acceleration of expansion" of dark energy may just be the exponential increase in wavelength vs. loss of mass-energy in the photon. No age limit would then be imposed on a possible eternal primeval energetic substance from which the universe has evolved.
Science Journalism may be bad, but mainstream journalism is just pathetic and morally wrong. Especially political, especially about Trump!
Love your channel Paul!
“Interesting” is completely subjective.
That's why it's "his" motto.
Is there a music free version of this video??
An a.i. video free version would be nice too
Yes, missed you. I have seen science, and, indeed, all human knowledge, compared to a huge edifice constantly being enlarged, where from time to time some part has to be renovated or altered, but the edifice remains.
Your videos have come a long way. My problem is that, this conundrum is not interesting and therefore is probably correct. Happens lots, and you know this Paul.
Does gravity need particles? Can dark matter be damaged, broken, bent space without any particles?
Do we have tunnel vision about assigning everything to particles (because quantum theories work very well). If gravity is the curvature of space then how can that be caused by particles anyway? Curving space surely is just curved space, not transmitted by some graviton particle?
Great video, I will be subscribing to this channel. I agree with other commenters, there is so much garbage out there that pretends to be scientific. Finding genuinely rigorous content such as yours is a breath of fresh air!
interesting video
Video starts at 5:30
Her is no marimbas out there
This was so interesting I had to stop listening to it because I need to get to sleep 😆. Will pick it back up tomorrow
If it’s interesting it’s wrong though.
@@MattCarvin I know lol, but I'm a neuroscience student, and a total nerd, so I think all the little non-sensational stuff is actually super fascinating. Like, did you know that specialized astrocyte cells release glutamate? How cool is that?
@@misslayer999 haha I agree, that’s why I would change the phrase to “if it’s sensational sounding, it probably isn’t true” if I were him.
@@MattCarvin right? That would definitely be more a more accurate way to put it lol
Yes! The Answer to your question is Yes!
However, it is only breaking the widely accepted cosmology. Lambda-CDM is an unfalsifiable model because it just keeps changing or updating!
How on earth did your sense of personal integrity survive praising this sponsor? :(
💰💰 Just let him have it and ignore the sponsor I guess, it's free money for people we like. Though I wish channels were more selective with who they advertise, or at the very least included hints that the sponsor is bad, I've just learned to completely ignore them and guess/hope most people do by now.
@@DaFinkingOrk I don’t begrudge him the money but it’s just depressing to see him advertise the very technology that drowns out good channels like his own with soulless unconscious mass-produced blather distilled from the collective work of who knows how many real people.
Yeah I couldn't quite believe it when I saw it. Super disappointing from someone who really ought to know better.
Their are missing pieces to the puzzle of everything
It was already broken.
Sorry, going straight into a long ad is too much. You might have a brilliant channel but i just dont think I can survive the journey !
Apologies again!
I am not interested in listening to ai video, the next things it will be generated ai scripts, and ai generated voice, and we wont know what real or not
If it’s interesting it’s probably wrong. This video was not interesting so you’re probably right.
I've seen you on tv, not sure what series but you sound like you have an archeology hat in the closet. ❤
Dr. Becky says that's fixed now.
🤣
AI generated videos, especially science, are God Damn boring 🥱