Using the Nikon with AE lock(Set AE-L/AF-L to AE lock (Hold)) Set Fn Button to Control ISO Sensitivity, Create (and Save) a Limited-Processing Picture Settings Profile, Set Auto Focus Mode to AF-S or use manual focus and make use of a loupe or viewfinder attachment, gives a far more cinematic quality to the movie when you use an shutter speed that is 1/2xfps of the fps (1/60th sec for 30fps) than the Canon can, and the Nikon will easily fit the best glass in the world, the Nikor lenses. If you want the best looking most film like movies, the Nikon is the hands-down winner.
I've been using both the EOS 600D and the D5200 for some time now and I feel like the color reproduction and exposure is just a tad bit better on Canon. However, Nikon has better detailing and low light performance with less noise in pictures. I know Nikon has the Picture control settings and I have been trying to adjust them to match the color reproduction on the 600D but I haven't really found success yet. Photos taken with the D5200 are a little less saturated which can ofcourse be corrected inside the camera or using the computer. It can even be pushed up a notch in the default picture control settings. All in all, I love my D5200 but I hate that the photos look just a little better on the EOS 600D.
I went out and tried both cameras. Honestly, I really like the D5100 better. It feels very nice in my hand, the auto focusing system works great, and its just more useful in terms of effects and features.
Very good comparison video! Props to the author. I noticed that video on the Nikon seems more "choppy". Too bad I have the nikon but I use it mainly to take photos.
hello..i want to ask..i like take photo and video..you said D5100 better for photo,600D better for video..but i like take photo and video also..which one should i get?
@iSOBigD By the way, you can however start recording on the D5100 then hold the auto exposure lock button to keep it from changing ISO and shutter speed while recording, but it's a work-around, you really should have the option of adjusting those before and during recording.
Both similar. However the extra tools on the Nikon are available in most editing programs. In terms of footage quality the Canon is much better in low light as it has a higher ISO. However the 100d which has recently come out has everything the 600d has as well as more focus points while filming, it is also smaller and much lighter. So i would recommend the Cannon 100D
Although I love both brands, I am a Canon shooter. The video is much better on the Canon, and to be quite honest, the photos from the T3i/600D are just fine. It was a great first DSLR. That being said, if you are new to the DSLR world and want to just take photos and not much video, then the D5100 makes a lot of sense as well. When it comes down to it, this wont be your last camera body if you are serious about this, and the thing that is most important is investing in good glass.
@kzdz I think that was just the aperture. in the 600d clip, the background was in focus also but in the d5100 clip, the background was blurred giving it that dreamy look.
Doesn't really matter, unless you're planning of filming vblogs under low light, the you should go for the Canon which is a little tiny bit more expensive. Both of them have mono integrated microphones but the sound magically turns stereo if you attach an external mic I guess :D Oh, and get a decent lens. around 35 to 55mm for best for vblogging. If you want the background to be sexy and blurred out, get a lens with a big apperture(small F number). or something..
@QuatroFDS T3i should be better since it has more manual controls for shooting video. Things like ISO and exposure locking are important for movies so it should be the better choice.
You can switch between auto and manual on the lens that comes with the camera and also on most other nikkor lenses. I love manual focus filming with my d5100 :)
I agree the most important thing is to know how to use it and learn to take advantage of all the features it offers. nikon I personally I have the wonderful and the best things I've bought without doubt
In good light conditions, both are doing a really good job. For low light conditions, canon is easier to have better results, but if you really know how to use your nikon, you will also get good results. Anyway, both cameras are really good. I am NIKON!
I'm still trying to set the Nikon D5100 but it seem to be pretty good for videos.. I make music videos but just learning the whole, shutter speed, contrast, fps
I would chose nikon for the af-f , canon is a manual video tool. Ive worked a lot on the canon 600d and i hate the metering, and the lack of full servo af, also the fact that you can control aperture and shutter speed in video mode means nothing, the buttons and dials make a lot of noise that will definitely be recorded and don't expect you can get a good mic for under 300 $ either. The canon has a lot less dynamic range and that for me settles it.
da..binen-teles, ca trebuie un alt obiectiv..si nu cel standard...caci poate ajunge la un pret colosalde exemplu si pana la peste 2000 euro..dar si mai mult..dar oricum mersi pentru raspuns...sunt nebun dupa aparatura electronika..si aparate ce apar pe piata..multumesc..
D5100 is great camera its already 1 year and 8 months I'm using my DSLR-D5100 we both enjoying at the same time from place to place... thanks for Nikon....
super video!! Ce mi-ai sugera pentru filmari personale...canon sau nikon?? Eu pana acum mergeam mult pe nikon..dar vazand si Canon-ul,, hmm parca imi place ceva mai mult!! un stiu poate a insel...Prefer sa aflu si parerea ta!! Te rog, fii sincer si rece...mersi mult!!
D5100 does not have manual settings even with trick! just two things: -Go to A mode (aperture priority) , hold the button that you set for aperture in M mode and you can up/down exposure -(2) you can push the Ae-lock button and camera doesn`t change exposure
I understood that the Nikon handles image noise better, but at the beginning of the comparison, when both are shooting low light scenes, the image of the Nikon looks horrible. Canon did that a lot better.
i am looking to buy one of them to but now im going to definitely go for the 600D. imi place mai mult cum arata canon la video si nikon e bun dar pixeli sunt mai precisi la canon si face videoul mai sharp.
In interface it doesn't matter much, both these entry camera's have an easy user interface. Best is to go to a store where you can hold them and feel the button layouts, whichever feels best is the one you should get, it's that easy.
The Nikon has a bigger sensor so high ISO picture quality is noticeably better than the T3i's, however, it'll choose the ISO value automatically for video, which isn't great for low light situations (since it'll jump to 1600 or more). If you're mainly using it for pictures though, the D5100 is cheaper and better. My Sony XR500V has much better video quality in low light conditions, but I need to use the D5100 for pictures. During the day, the Nikon should be as good or better than the T3i.
deci eu locuiesc in austria, pretul ar fi ceva intre 500-600€. precizez ca nu am experienta in fotografie sau facut videouri, deci ar fi fain o camera care e mai simpla ceva genul pt incepatori, dar totusi cu o calitate buna pt clipuri low budget. sorry daca pun intrebari stupide, dar chiar nu ma cunosc in domeniul acesta. mersi pt raspuns :)
love the video feature on the 600d but the color from the nikon is more vibrant! well, just add some contrast on the picture style of the 600d and boom! done.
Imi cer scuze ca intervin, dar incerc sa imi dau si eu cu parerea. Eu am un Canon 550D, mi-am luat pt zoom un obiectiv 70-200 f2.8, ai si lumina buna si zoom ok. Obiectivul e mult mai important decat body-ul. Obiectivu 18-55mm cu care vin in general DSLR-urile is mai mult de jucarie, uni fotografi le zic capace de aparat :P Deci in concluzie, poti avea un DSLR cu zoom, daca iti achizitionezi un alt obiectiv nu cel standard. Toate cele bune.
i can see many reviewers never mention about camera video framerate cause most of cases they dont care about video framerate but today framerate is important making video higher FPS or frame per second delivers very dramatic beautiful scene of slowmotion GoPro3 is one of those awesome camera the GP3 Black Edition can go whopping up to 240fps if you love creating awesome slowmo video you probably go with higher fps so 600D can do 60fps while D5100 30fos only you might change your mind like me..
fara doar si poate canon si nikon nu sunt de comparat,dar canon e cu treapta sau mai multe peste..motivul e ca isi respecta clientii producand toate dslr-urile la aceleasi standarde cu cele pro dar folosind alte materiale cand vine vb de entry level sau semi pro in aceeasi fabrica din japonia adica "made in japan"
Which one is better for somewhat vlogging? Actually vlogging isn't the correct term, more like, which one is better for turning the camera on myself and recording myself? I am still kinda a beginner to DSLRs. Please help.
salut; orice microfon de pe orice camera pusa pe auto intr-o camera cu asa zisa liniste, scoate un fasait; orice AGC (auto gain control) asta face, ea sunetul cel mai tare si il normalizeaza... deci daca e un sunet foarte fin il va transforma in fasait
I've been in the same scenario as you for the past 2+ years. Have a D5000 and hate the fact that I have to click auto exposure lock every time I film and I can't choose exactly what I want settings wise. Canon still dominates in video.
buna!, mi-a placut comparatia pe care ai facut-o in legatura cu cele doua aparate si ma gandeam daca ai putea sa ma lamuresti cu privire la un aparat foto. tin sa evidentiez faptul ca sunt pasionat de fotografie dar sunt abea la inceput pot spune. cum am putea lua legatura? astept raspuns. multumesc anticipat
"mainly because you have full auto on the Canon and the Nikon is only fully automatic" - You've said the same thing for both. Can you please explain why the Canon is better?
Hmm, not sure why you say the canon is better for video. Your shots show that nikon does a better job at focusing and selecting the correct values. The nikon shots had better saturation and light. At least that is what it looked like to me.
d5100 megre la video cu modurile semi automate (PSA),dar seteaza isoul automat si timpul de exp.(sau diafragma in S si P) dar isoul automat poate fi limitat de tine la valori intre 200 si 6400 si atunci vei avea un control mai bun al expunerii.La calitatea imaginii este mult peste canon, si daca nu vrei sa faci doar video cam pentru orice alceva nikon e peste 600d ule asta.
@XxXxsomosdiiosasxXxX pe camera labs punct com (nu pot scrie nume de site-uri de aceea scriu codat:))poti vedea si descarca pozele originale si dupa te uiti bine la ele pe pc tau.O sa observi la distanta cand faci zoom cate defecte prezinta pozele canon,asa zisul defect 'fringing' apar contururi duble de culoare rosie la obiectele indepartate,in schimb datorita procesorului expeed2 Nikon aceste defecte vin eliminate complet,se pot elimina si la Canon dar doar in PP
daca nu utilizezi obietive tele si nu te deranjeaza lipsa vizorului optic iti recomand c u caldura sony NEX5N.AU CEL mai bun senzor crop de pe piata la semnal/zgomot la iso mare si deasemenea ofera niste culori mirifice,cat despre obiectivul 18 55 kit e zeiss metal solid,recomand .
Apparently if you want to set the aperture to wide to get a small depth of field and out of focus background, you should set the aperture before turning to live view. Otherwise the aperture and exposure will be set automatically by the camera. I think that's what was meant by automatic, not the focus. :)
yes true. canon does have a focus motor so that the older lenses can be used. unfortunately canon cant auto focus on video (except the 650D) but Nikon do have cameras which do have a focus motor in built. eg - D90 D7000, D300, D200 and so on :)
@3puncte Which would you suggest if Video quality is a top priority. It seems like the Cannon was better in this video, but it was hard to tell for sure. Plus, youtube videos are not the most accurate reproduction comparison. With your experience with the two cameras, which one do you prefer for video purposes?
cea care iti place ... si depinde si de oferta ... avand in verede ca ambele sunt entry level nu exceleaza prea mult la capitolu video ,dar canon e putin peste , dpdv al fotografiilor mergi linistit pe nikon , dar daca nu te-au deranjat diferentele din clipul de mai sus , inseamna ca si nikonu-l isi face treaba bine la capitolul video (pentru tine)...
Nu regret ca mi-am luat canonul. Desi obiectivele de Nikon sunt mai ieftine si mai bune (nu vorbim de L desigur). Dar controlul manual in timpul filmului? Sa fim seriosi. Cind invarti de rotita aia ca sa schimbi ISO sau timp de expunere sau diafragma se zguduie imaginea din toate incheieturile. Nu ai cum sa folosesti un film de genu asta decit daca ai aparatul legat fedeles de ceva Extrem De Greu. Observ line skipping mai redus la Canon. Sa fie oare procesorul mai rapid? :D
Of course the noise depends on your own control of the ISO settings, You shouldn't use higher ISO than 1600 or it will become noisy, and of course if you have an aperture of 5.6 it will be darker than if you have a f 1.4, Nikon is really good managing noise, but as I always say, "It's not the camera, the important one is the photographer".
Da, si mie imi plac in general, dar aparatele foto in mod special deoarece ma ocup de fotografie si cateodata mai lucrez si la cate un videoclip. O mare parte din videoclipurile pe care le vedem in ziua de azi la TV sunt facute cu aparate DSLR :) deci nu ai nevoie neaparat de o camera video pentru filmari de calitate.
Is all about lens. None mention that in video clips i see on RUclips. Do same filming with standard 18-55 lens 3.5-5f and you''ll be disappointed, do it again with more "expensive" lens to see difference.
The most important is the lens. What cost can be, even must be not less, than a camera price, for real good shoots and a pleasure feelings of soul))) It hard to undestand for beginner, but you must to understand that. For video-mode maybe better to try fast (f/1.4) manuall prime lenses...
Nikon D5100 has image ratio 3:2 whereas Canon EOS 600D has 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 If you want to make video with Nikon pictures you'll have black sides because you have no other options. Having full manual control in video mode in 600D umm yeah it is very important to many users (video makers). Can't wait to get Canon EOS 600D.
@blu3sh4dow4u o alegere buna,sensorul aps-c de la canon e doar putin mai mic nu mult mai mic dar sunt 18 mil pixeli asa ca 4,3 vs 4,7ù,oricum distorsiunile lipsesc la nikon datorita procesorului expeed 2 care le elimina in proportie de 99%,digic 4 de la canon nu le elimina,pot fi eliminate doar in PP,distorsiunile sunt direct pro cu, calitatea obiectivelor si e stie ca si aici obiectivele Nikon sunt mai performante. Oricum daca te pricepi si vrei sa te apuci serios de fotografie
Intr-o camera unde nu se aude nici-un sunet, aparatul Nikon D5100 inregistreaza un fașait? P.S. fa un test de sunet, te rog. Si sa incluzi si un test in liniste completa! Te rog, am nevoie urgent.
To be honest i dont really see much in both of them and its better to shoot with a Flat image To make editing Easier and better. D5100 had more grain than the 600D at night. Both good cameras doesn't matter which one you buy.
@blu3sh4dow4u Corect ! Hasselblad h4d 60,Leica S2 astea sunt Fotocamere dar fratioare tre' sa scoti din buzunar 20.000-30.000. de euro plus Obiective si accesorii de 20.000 de euro.... Intrebare e urmatoarea... Ai nevoie cu adevarat de asa ceva ? :))) Multi nu stiu ca 50% din calitatea unei foto o dau obiectivele,si ca sa ai calitate trebuie sa fotografiezi in RAW+ elaborare PP....
Nikon D5100 all the way!
Normally
Yes
you were supposed to film the same things for both cameras...
Nikon D5100, you have my heart.
Daniela García same here
Foarte bun videoclipul! Prezinta unele caracteristici greu de observat in lista de specificatii, inclusiv in multe review-uri!
foarte bun review-ul in sensul in care ai abordat cred cam toate instantele posibile film sau foto
I clicked on this video, then read the description. Nu stiu de ce, dar ma-m fost bucuros sa vad niste limba romana!
Oau..cand am vazut primele cuvinte in romana nu imi venea sa cred ca videoclipul le apartine unor romani...BRAVO! SUS CU VOI, tineti'o tot asa !
Using the Nikon with AE lock(Set AE-L/AF-L to AE lock (Hold)) Set Fn Button to Control ISO Sensitivity, Create (and Save) a Limited-Processing Picture Settings Profile, Set Auto Focus Mode to AF-S or use manual focus and make use of a loupe or viewfinder attachment, gives a far more cinematic quality to the movie when you use an shutter speed that is 1/2xfps of the fps (1/60th sec for 30fps) than the Canon can, and the Nikon will easily fit the best glass in the world, the Nikor lenses.
If you want the best looking most film like movies, the Nikon is the hands-down winner.
Foarte frumos , felicitari pentru acest clip !
I've been using both the EOS 600D and the D5200 for some time now and I feel like the color reproduction and exposure is just a tad bit better on Canon. However, Nikon has better detailing and low light performance with less noise in pictures.
I know Nikon has the Picture control settings and I have been trying to adjust them to match the color reproduction on the 600D but I haven't really found success yet. Photos taken with the D5200 are a little less saturated which can ofcourse be corrected inside the camera or using the computer. It can even be pushed up a notch in the default picture control settings.
All in all, I love my D5200 but I hate that the photos look just a little better on the EOS 600D.
Mi'ar placea sa vad mai multe review'uri de la tine in genul celor de la DigitaRev
Nikon d5100 any time, any day!
I went out and tried both cameras. Honestly, I really like the D5100 better. It feels very nice in my hand, the auto focusing system works great, and its just more useful in terms of effects and features.
Местами Canon 600D лучше, а местами Nikon D5100 выигрывает. Так что и не скажешь какой из них лучше.
it seemed to me better clarity in 5100
Разыгрываю фотокамеру Nikon и экшн камеру 4К. С наступающим новым годом! Творческих успехов и всего доброго
the Nikon seems to have better colors and a sharper image
Absolutely the Nikon D5100. Because much better in terms of focus and in terms of video quality. Nikon is more ahead.
Very good comparison video! Props to the author. I noticed that video on the Nikon seems more "choppy". Too bad I have the nikon but I use it mainly to take photos.
hello..i want to ask..i like take photo and video..you said D5100 better for photo,600D better for video..but i like take photo and video also..which one should i get?
both cameras are very good really, but my choice is Nikon D5100! It's a wonderful camera!
I'd watched this video in 2014 and i came here in 2023 and noticed that background sound is changed .
@iSOBigD By the way, you can however start recording on the D5100 then hold the auto exposure lock button to keep it from changing ISO and shutter speed while recording, but it's a work-around, you really should have the option of adjusting those before and during recording.
Both similar. However the extra tools on the Nikon are available in most editing programs. In terms of footage quality the Canon is much better in low light as it has a higher ISO. However the 100d which has recently come out has everything the 600d has as well as more focus points while filming, it is also smaller and much lighter. So i would recommend the Cannon 100D
Although I love both brands, I am a Canon shooter. The video is much better on the Canon, and to be quite honest, the photos from the T3i/600D are just fine. It was a great first DSLR. That being said, if you are new to the DSLR world and want to just take photos and not much video, then the D5100 makes a lot of sense as well. When it comes down to it, this wont be your last camera body if you are serious about this, and the thing that is most important is investing in good glass.
@I200gI i like the 600D alot; regarding the manual focus, it's just about your hand and inspiration, the camera is just fine :)
@kzdz I think that was just the aperture. in the 600d clip, the background was in focus also but in the d5100 clip, the background was blurred giving it that dreamy look.
i totally agree with you on the description. your comparison is spot on. thank you =)
Doesn't really matter, unless you're planning of filming vblogs under low light, the you should go for the Canon which is a little tiny bit more expensive. Both of them have mono integrated microphones but the sound magically turns stereo if you attach an external mic I guess :D Oh, and get a decent lens. around 35 to 55mm for best for vblogging. If you want the background to be sexy and blurred out, get a lens with a big apperture(small F number). or something..
this was a good comparison test. i wish there were more low-light/nighttime examples to see the iso performance though
@QuatroFDS T3i should be better since it has more manual controls for shooting video. Things like ISO and exposure locking are important for movies so it should be the better choice.
You can switch between auto and manual on the lens that comes with the camera and also on most other nikkor lenses. I love manual focus filming with my d5100 :)
Nikon d5100 looks much better !
I agree the most important thing is to know how to use it and learn to take advantage of all the features it offers. nikon I personally I have the wonderful and the best things I've bought without doubt
In good light conditions, both are doing a really good job. For low light conditions, canon is easier to have better results, but if you really know how to use your nikon, you will also get good results. Anyway, both cameras are really good. I am NIKON!
canon 600d is better but why there is no autofocus while recording the video
ку
Un Test de Nota 10 ? thumbs up !
I think nikons shoots better DAYTIME video than the 600D..but the NIGHT TIME video from the 600D is better then the Nikon..
which doesnt make any sense considering the d5100 should perform better in low light. im really confuse
dap, merg pe D5100 :D
Multumesc ptr. review amice! La mai mare ;)
I'm still trying to set the Nikon D5100 but it seem to be pretty good for videos.. I make music videos but just learning the whole, shutter speed, contrast, fps
I would chose nikon for the af-f , canon is a manual video tool. Ive worked a lot on the canon 600d and i hate the metering, and the lack of full servo af, also the fact that you can control aperture and shutter speed in video mode means nothing, the buttons and dials make a lot of noise that will definitely be recorded and don't expect you can get a good mic for under 300 $ either. The canon has a lot less dynamic range and that for me settles it.
to avoid the exposure change on the nikon d5100 you simply use the exposure lock button..
Good ! :)
How did you do to don't have noise on your videos filmed by the 600D ?
da..binen-teles, ca trebuie un alt obiectiv..si nu cel standard...caci poate ajunge la un pret colosalde exemplu si pana la peste 2000 euro..dar si mai mult..dar oricum mersi pentru raspuns...sunt nebun dupa aparatura electronika..si aparate ce apar pe piata..multumesc..
Am venit aici asteptandu-ma la un videoclip in engleza :))
D5100 is great camera its already 1 year and 8 months I'm using my DSLR-D5100 we both enjoying at the same time from place to place... thanks for Nikon....
super video!! Ce mi-ai sugera pentru filmari personale...canon sau nikon?? Eu pana acum mergeam mult pe nikon..dar vazand si Canon-ul,, hmm parca imi place ceva mai mult!! un stiu poate a insel...Prefer sa aflu si parerea ta!! Te rog, fii sincer si rece...mersi mult!!
foarte bine realizat!
D5100 does not have manual settings even with trick!
just two things:
-Go to A mode (aperture priority) , hold the button that you set for aperture in M mode and you can up/down exposure
-(2) you can push the Ae-lock button and camera doesn`t change exposure
I understood that the Nikon handles image noise better, but at the beginning of the comparison, when both are shooting low light scenes, the image of the Nikon looks horrible. Canon did that a lot better.
Super review-ul dar imi poti spune numele melodie de la inceput?
i am looking to buy one of them to but now im going to definitely go for the 600D.
imi place mai mult cum arata canon la video si nikon e bun dar pixeli sunt mai precisi la canon si face videoul mai sharp.
Great video...personally the main reason I buy a SLR is for photos, so I went with the Nikon. Canon is slightly beter for video. thnks again.
Very nice video! I will buy the D5100 soon!
In interface it doesn't matter much, both these entry camera's have an easy user interface. Best is to go to a store where you can hold them and feel the button layouts, whichever feels best is the one you should get, it's that easy.
The Nikon has a bigger sensor so high ISO picture quality is noticeably better than the T3i's, however, it'll choose the ISO value automatically for video, which isn't great for low light situations (since it'll jump to 1600 or more). If you're mainly using it for pictures though, the D5100 is cheaper and better. My Sony XR500V has much better video quality in low light conditions, but I need to use the D5100 for pictures. During the day, the Nikon should be as good or better than the T3i.
salut alex. o intrebare scurta, ce camera mi-ai recomanda pentru videouri de muzica? have a nice day ;)
salut. pai depinde cati bani ai si cat stii sa le folosesti; asa pret-calitate ai putea lua un panasonic gf sau gh
deci eu locuiesc in austria, pretul ar fi ceva intre 500-600€. precizez ca nu am experienta in fotografie sau facut videouri, deci ar fi fain o camera care e mai simpla ceva genul pt incepatori, dar totusi cu o calitate buna pt clipuri low budget. sorry daca pun intrebari stupide, dar chiar nu ma cunosc in domeniul acesta. mersi pt raspuns :)
Just got a D5100 and loving it!
love the video feature on the 600d but the color from the nikon is more vibrant! well, just add some contrast on the picture style of the 600d and boom! done.
Imi cer scuze ca intervin, dar incerc sa imi dau si eu cu parerea.
Eu am un Canon 550D, mi-am luat pt zoom un obiectiv 70-200 f2.8, ai si lumina buna si zoom ok. Obiectivul e mult mai important decat body-ul.
Obiectivu 18-55mm cu care vin in general DSLR-urile is mai mult de jucarie, uni fotografi le zic capace de aparat :P
Deci in concluzie, poti avea un DSLR cu zoom, daca iti achizitionezi un alt obiectiv nu cel standard.
Toate cele bune.
If u r confused which one to buy I would suggest buy both of them and mix it up together and give a name like CANNIK.
and enjoy. Lol
Lol
or Nick cannon
i can see many reviewers never mention about camera video framerate cause most of cases they dont care about video framerate but today framerate is important making video higher FPS or frame per second delivers very dramatic beautiful scene of slowmotion GoPro3 is one of those awesome camera the GP3 Black Edition can go whopping up to 240fps if you love creating awesome slowmo video you probably go with higher fps so 600D can do 60fps while D5100 30fos only you might change your mind like me..
fara doar si poate canon si nikon nu sunt de comparat,dar canon e cu treapta sau mai multe peste..motivul e ca isi respecta clientii producand toate dslr-urile la aceleasi standarde cu cele pro dar folosind alte materiale cand vine vb de entry level sau semi pro in aceeasi fabrica din japonia adica "made in japan"
Which one is better for somewhat vlogging? Actually vlogging isn't the correct term, more like, which one is better for turning the camera on myself and recording myself? I am still kinda a beginner to DSLRs. Please help.
salut; orice microfon de pe orice camera pusa pe auto intr-o camera cu asa zisa liniste, scoate un fasait; orice AGC (auto gain control) asta face, ea sunetul cel mai tare si il normalizeaza... deci daca e un sunet foarte fin il va transforma in fasait
I think D5100 is a good one but with the 18-105 lens not the standard one.
I've been in the same scenario as you for the past 2+ years. Have a D5000 and hate the fact that I have to click auto exposure lock every time I film and I can't choose exactly what I want settings wise. Canon still dominates in video.
@simon44 you are right, my mistake, a typo :P Canon is better because it has full MANUAL controls. that's the selling point for me.
buna!, mi-a placut comparatia pe care ai facut-o in legatura cu cele doua aparate si ma gandeam daca ai putea sa ma lamuresti cu privire la un aparat foto. tin sa evidentiez faptul ca sunt pasionat de fotografie dar sunt abea la inceput pot spune. cum am putea lua legatura? astept raspuns. multumesc anticipat
"mainly because you have full auto on the Canon and the Nikon is only fully automatic" - You've said the same thing for both. Can you please explain why the Canon is better?
Thank you very much for this video)))
Did you changed the sound of the track.. I watched this same video in 2014..that time i loved the track. But now i am not able to find that
Hmm, not sure why you say the canon is better for video. Your shots show that nikon does a better job at focusing and selecting the correct values. The nikon shots had better saturation and light.
At least that is what it looked like to me.
d5100 megre la video cu modurile semi automate (PSA),dar seteaza isoul automat si timpul de exp.(sau diafragma in S si P) dar isoul automat poate fi limitat de tine la valori intre 200 si 6400 si atunci vei avea un control mai bun al expunerii.La calitatea imaginii este mult peste canon, si daca nu vrei sa faci doar video cam pentru orice alceva nikon e peste 600d ule asta.
@XxXxsomosdiiosasxXxX pe camera labs punct com (nu pot scrie nume de site-uri de aceea scriu codat:))poti vedea si descarca pozele originale si dupa te uiti bine la ele pe pc tau.O sa observi la distanta cand faci zoom cate defecte prezinta pozele canon,asa zisul defect 'fringing' apar contururi duble de culoare rosie la obiectele indepartate,in schimb datorita procesorului expeed2 Nikon aceste defecte vin eliminate complet,se pot elimina si la Canon dar doar in PP
daca nu utilizezi obietive tele si nu te deranjeaza lipsa vizorului optic iti recomand c u caldura sony NEX5N.AU CEL mai bun senzor crop de pe piata la semnal/zgomot la iso mare si deasemenea ofera niste culori mirifice,cat despre obiectivul 18 55 kit e zeiss metal solid,recomand .
Apparently if you want to set the aperture to wide to get a small depth of field and out of focus background, you should set the aperture before turning to live view. Otherwise the aperture and exposure will be set automatically by the camera. I think that's what was meant by automatic, not the focus. :)
yes true. canon does have a focus motor so that the older lenses can be used. unfortunately canon cant auto focus on video (except the 650D) but Nikon do have cameras which do have a focus motor in built. eg - D90 D7000, D300, D200 and so on :)
D5100 is also manual for video but you have to set the preferences before you swich to liveview... plus better images... I'll go for the D5100
Nikon D5100 :)
real question is what camera filmed this
it looks AMAZING
@3puncte Which would you suggest if Video quality is a top priority. It seems like the Cannon was better in this video, but it was hard to tell for sure. Plus, youtube videos are not the most accurate reproduction comparison. With your experience with the two cameras, which one do you prefer for video purposes?
cea care iti place ... si depinde si de oferta ...
avand in verede ca ambele sunt entry level nu exceleaza prea mult la capitolu video ,dar canon e putin peste , dpdv al fotografiilor mergi linistit pe nikon , dar daca nu te-au deranjat diferentele din clipul de mai sus , inseamna ca si nikonu-l isi face treaba bine la capitolul video (pentru tine)...
Nu regret ca mi-am luat canonul. Desi obiectivele de Nikon sunt mai ieftine si mai bune (nu vorbim de L desigur). Dar controlul manual in timpul filmului? Sa fim seriosi. Cind invarti de rotita aia ca sa schimbi ISO sau timp de expunere sau diafragma se zguduie imaginea din toate incheieturile. Nu ai cum sa folosesti un film de genu asta decit daca ai aparatul legat fedeles de ceva Extrem De Greu. Observ line skipping mai redus la Canon. Sa fie oare procesorul mai rapid? :D
Of course the noise depends on your own control of the ISO settings, You shouldn't use higher ISO than 1600 or it will become noisy, and of course if you have an aperture of 5.6 it will be darker than if you have a f 1.4, Nikon is really good managing noise, but as I always say, "It's not the camera, the important one is the photographer".
good video!hey 600d did not focus on that yellow chair like thing in auto,d5100 did.
mersi pt. raspuns asa de repede..si ce ai alege inte sony si canon ?
thanks for the vid. yeah the focus of the nikon is really better
Da, si mie imi plac in general, dar aparatele foto in mod special deoarece ma ocup de fotografie si cateodata mai lucrez si la cate un videoclip.
O mare parte din videoclipurile pe care le vedem in ziua de azi la TV sunt facute cu aparate DSLR :) deci nu ai nevoie neaparat de o camera video pentru filmari de calitate.
Is all about lens. None mention that in video clips i see on RUclips. Do same filming with standard 18-55 lens 3.5-5f and you''ll be disappointed, do it again with more "expensive" lens to see difference.
@3puncte Doesn't take a manual for you to figure out where the AE-lock is. That's just plain laziness.
The most important is the lens. What cost can be, even must be not less, than a camera price, for real good shoots and a pleasure feelings of soul)))
It hard to undestand for beginner, but you must to understand that.
For video-mode maybe better to try fast (f/1.4) manuall prime lenses...
Nikon D5100 has image ratio 3:2 whereas Canon EOS 600D has 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9
If you want to make video with Nikon pictures you'll have black sides because you have no other options.
Having full manual control in video mode in 600D umm yeah it is very important to many users (video makers).
Can't wait to get Canon EOS 600D.
Nikon is always better
Totally إنسان بسيط جدا
@blu3sh4dow4u o alegere buna,sensorul aps-c de la canon e doar putin mai mic nu mult mai mic dar sunt 18 mil pixeli asa ca 4,3 vs 4,7ù,oricum distorsiunile lipsesc la nikon datorita procesorului expeed 2 care le elimina in proportie de 99%,digic 4 de la canon nu le elimina,pot fi eliminate doar in PP,distorsiunile sunt direct pro cu, calitatea obiectivelor si e stie ca si aici obiectivele Nikon sunt mai performante.
Oricum daca te pricepi si vrei sa te apuci serios de fotografie
@3puncte Mai mult dekt pentru video, as folosi-o pentru a face poze. :D
Atunci, ar fi mai buna Nikon?
Intr-o camera unde nu se aude nici-un sunet, aparatul Nikon D5100 inregistreaza un fașait?
P.S. fa un test de sunet, te rog. Si sa incluzi si un test in liniste completa! Te rog, am nevoie urgent.
@acquleo i didn't set anything, like you said is only auto - i just took notes of what the camera chose.
To be honest i dont really see much in both of them and its better to shoot with a Flat image To make editing Easier and better. D5100 had more grain than the 600D at night. Both good cameras doesn't matter which one you buy.
Lance Cassidy CHeck my videos - all made by Canon EOS 600D
@blu3sh4dow4u Corect ! Hasselblad h4d 60,Leica S2 astea sunt Fotocamere dar fratioare tre' sa scoti din buzunar 20.000-30.000. de euro plus Obiective si accesorii de 20.000 de euro.... Intrebare e urmatoarea... Ai nevoie cu adevarat de asa ceva ? :)))
Multi nu stiu ca 50% din calitatea unei foto o dau obiectivele,si ca sa ai calitate trebuie sa fotografiezi in RAW+ elaborare PP....