Yes..he could have gone for rook exchange..and go for pawn with his bishop after rooks out..he would have upper hand with rook vs knight..and good pawn structure..clearly..a blunder..earlier he could have moved his queen out of sight to magnus rook..that is turning point..
One little blunder is enough to lose the game against Magnus.
against anyone :)
What about the idea of Ruck exchange towards the end
Yes..he could have gone for rook exchange..and go for pawn with his bishop after rooks out..he would have upper hand with rook vs knight..and good pawn structure..clearly..a blunder..earlier he could have moved his queen out of sight to magnus rook..that is turning point..
What did you guys think of this incredible game between Magnus Carlsen and Arjun Erigaisi?
Click bait .. nobody got dismantled 🙄
Brilliant game ! thanks for the move-by-move !!
why A E didnt go for rook to B3 ? It could have stopped the pawns
Thank you sir.
The endgame tactics of Magnus are too good. If towards the end the game is balanced - he will probably win.
Night vs Bishop
Let’s watch the game first ,then do your commentary
thanks
The goat!
👍👍👍❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏
Bleat...