the shot is fine by me, its a push so it can be raised. 9.9 Players must not intentionally raise the ball from a hit except for a shot at goal. A raised hit must be judged explicitly on whether or not it is raised intentionally. It is not an offence to raise the ball unintentionally from a hit, including a free hit, anywhere on the field unless it is dangerous. If the ball is raised over an opponent’s stick or body on the ground, even within the circle, it is permitted unless judged to be dangerous. however the injection is foul because the attacker that inject the ball played it twice. 13.3.j - after playing the ball, the attacker taking the push or hit from the back-line must not play the ball again or approach within playing distance of it until it has been played by another player.
@@rhyangriffiths5398 13.3.j - after playing the ball, the attacker taking the push or hit from the back-line must not play the ball again or approach within playing distance of it until it has been played by another player.
@@rhyangriffiths5398 yes. if the injector stop after the first contact, the defending player can reach to the ball faster than any other attacker player.
Agreed about the insertion, play should have been whistled right then for a double touch. However, for the scoop shot on the cage, even though it's not a hit, I would consider that dangerous (as an aside, this is Exhibit A for why all corner defenders should be wearing face masks)
Free hit for defense! Dangerous play for the defender player cause the goalkepper is behind.
play on for me. the first HIT must be backboard height that was a scoop so play on.
free hit for defender coz not enough 3 touch the pusher high ball to scoring for shot conner and danger to defender opponent
@@nurulasyhadah503 it was a valid shot on goal and the defender stood in between the taker and the gk so I'm gonna have to disagree with you.
the shot is fine by me, its a push so it can be raised.
9.9 Players must not intentionally raise the ball from a hit except for a shot at goal. A raised hit must be judged explicitly on whether or not it is raised intentionally. It is not an offence to raise the ball unintentionally from a hit, including a free hit, anywhere on the field unless it is dangerous. If the ball is raised over an opponent’s stick or body on the ground, even within the circle, it is permitted unless judged to be dangerous.
however the injection is foul because the attacker that inject the ball played it twice.
13.3.j - after playing the ball, the attacker taking the push or hit from the back-line must not play the ball again or approach within playing distance of it until it has been played by another player.
but did the attacking team gain an advantage that they wouldn't gained if the injector only played the ball once?
@@rhyangriffiths5398 13.3.j - after playing the ball, the attacker taking the push or hit from the back-line must not play the ball again or approach within playing distance of it until it has been played by another player.
@@azzadzarull yes I know it's against the rules but did the team gain an advantage from breaking the rules?
@@rhyangriffiths5398 yes. if the injector stop after the first contact, the defending player can reach to the ball faster than any other attacker player.
Agreed about the insertion, play should have been whistled right then for a double touch.
However, for the scoop shot on the cage, even though it's not a hit, I would consider that dangerous (as an aside, this is Exhibit A for why all corner defenders should be wearing face masks)
Free hit for defense. The attacker playing the ball hit the ball two times. She should no play or approach after the first push
but was an advantage gained by the attacker hitting the ball twice on the injection?