BIG CAM & LOW COMPRESSION (MISTAKE?) STROKER, NOS OR BLOWER? WHICH 800-HP BBC COMBO WOULD YOU PICK?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024

Комментарии • 94

  • @jeffrykopis5468
    @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +24

    Rich, do you think you and Freiburger could sweet talk GM into "loaning" you guys (😉😂) a new 1000-hp 632 for dyno testing, mods, boost, etc? For a magazine article, of course, AND your channel, AND Engine Masters. David, do it!

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +7

      they might have that kind of pull-me...not so much!

    • @tonymorse7178
      @tonymorse7178 2 года назад +2

      Freiburg is a Mopar died-in-the-wool guy. GM knows it, so they probably are not gonna give him a $30,000 GM premier engine package.....

    • @jeffrykopis5468
      @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад

      @@tonymorse7178 I know Dave's first love is Mopars, but he's built a ton of both SB and BB Chevies. Don't forget, he owns the megabuck F-Bomb Camaro, the Crusher Camaro, a 56 Chevy, races a BB Camaro at Bonneville, and has and 800hp BBC in his Model A. He also has Fords and Jeeps.

  • @jeffrykopis5468
    @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +5

    This was one of my favorite vids you've ever done.

  • @aaronanderson6892
    @aaronanderson6892 2 года назад +10

    We also learned that the 8.1 vortec has a big torque advantage with low boosts compared to all 3 tested

  • @swamper2fly
    @swamper2fly 2 года назад +2

    You leave no data out. Thank you for your efforts

  • @b.c4066
    @b.c4066 2 года назад +6

    First comment again! 😁 Can we get back to turbo gen1 sbc stuff please 🤣

    • @musclebone7875
      @musclebone7875 2 года назад +6

      We love big block chevy powerrrr💪

    • @b.c4066
      @b.c4066 2 года назад +3

      @@musclebone7875 so do I, honestly I love them all. Chevy, Ford, Mopar, Buick, Pontiac, Oldsmobile Cadillac, Studebaker.. AMC.. and all their big and small engines

    • @musclebone7875
      @musclebone7875 2 года назад +2

      @@b.c4066 nothing wrong with that

    • @fenatic7484
      @fenatic7484 2 года назад

      @@b.c4066 Me too. I have a soft spot for FEs myself. They made a fine engine for every purpose.

  • @MsMichael200
    @MsMichael200 10 месяцев назад +1

    On the low compression big block, what would be the outcome if you swapped those heads for a smaller chamber equal flow head and went with more cam? Would it have pushed it into the 900s or higher?

  • @Harrybowles1969
    @Harrybowles1969 2 года назад +5

    Keep going Richard untill 2000hp!

  • @bdugle1
    @bdugle1 2 года назад +1

    ZZ454 plus two GT-45s! Dial in 800hp…

  • @quevicular
    @quevicular 2 года назад +6

    Hey Rich, could you do a comparison of a low compression big block and a high compression big block using mostly the exact parts and pieces and then add nitrous. Like to see that 540cu in as a demonstration. Thanks

    • @kellyheath8547
      @kellyheath8547 2 года назад +3

      nitrous is nitrous, whatever the jet size is the hp you will add regardless of the base HP number (to a point). Compression will do your standard 4% per point of compression. As long as you aren't octane limited you should be good making more power with the high compression. Ask this question at the live session at 7 and you might get a more detailed answer.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +3

      Kelly is correct-nitrous will add the same amount to each base combo-the higher compression will start and end with more power

  • @LightningFast240
    @LightningFast240 2 года назад +1

    Would you happen to know what's the max safe overbore on a gen 6 BBC 454?

    • @jondahl3173
      @jondahl3173 2 года назад

      Check cylinder walls for thickness, you could be anywhere between a .030 overbore to upwards of .100 overbore. My Gen5 roller block is at a safe .040 overbore. The more you stress it via boost/nitrous the more wall thickness is needed.

    • @LightningFast240
      @LightningFast240 2 года назад

      @@jondahl3173 just a tow pig man. Plan on throwing a 540 in it in the end. Just wanted to refresh the stock vortec with a stroker kit. I was thinking a 505 kit

  • @cariodelgado742
    @cariodelgado742 7 месяцев назад +1

    Two expensive parts. A L.s motor can do more horsepower very cheap parts old-school so expensive

  • @danielormsby2201
    @danielormsby2201 2 года назад +1

    Has anyone made a 496 using a 4.375"crank and 4.25bore

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +1

      that is not a great choice-the longer stroke crank causes windage issues

    • @danielormsby2201
      @danielormsby2201 2 года назад

      @@richardholdener1727 even if it's low rpm use intended?

  • @sircruse1422
    @sircruse1422 2 года назад +1

    Hey, do you run both rings with .028- .03 or are the rings different?

  • @jeffrykopis5468
    @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +6

    Can you test PROGRESSIVE nitrous controllers that ramp up the nitrous and fuel gradually between, say, 3500 and 6500? (I'm just full of great questions today 😂)

    • @fenatic7484
      @fenatic7484 2 года назад

      That is where the 8.1 shines is how many algorithms you can mix and match with the shutter wheel, a good tuner can write these into your tune to activate and modify the tables to the hard parameters and allow “ 1 then 0 , if zero then parameter table 2 for those little moments that aren’t available under the standard algorithm for manual function, written as a separate set of “if” or “if not menu readouts and allow it to show during data logging. The tuner can then set new parameters for the controller.

    • @fenatic7484
      @fenatic7484 2 года назад

      Actually traction and making fuel eliminates a good number of factors that can bugger up a lot of conditions. I don’t like a lack of those things very much. At least you have an idea where to tune

  • @72blazer48
    @72blazer48 2 года назад +1

    More fuel with larger TB will cool intake charge more as it vaporizes. Lower temp intake charge seams correct as more fuel is vaporized. My data for this conclusion is for carbed C/SA car, 1/4 mile. Intake charge air temp near head at launch 110 degrees and 67 degrees at finish line. Racepak data logger.

  • @peaceandrelaxationwithgodscrea
    @peaceandrelaxationwithgodscrea 2 года назад +2

    A cost per 800hp motor would be interesting also

  • @michaelgarrow3239
    @michaelgarrow3239 2 года назад +2

    Mmmm- Big block. 🤩😋

  • @juddpringle9850
    @juddpringle9850 2 года назад +1

    Please do this series or a similar one with a BBF!!

  • @shitbox82
    @shitbox82 2 года назад +1

    That 496 would be a blast on the street, NA or spray. 👍🏻

  • @regal105
    @regal105 2 года назад +2

    Thinking about low compression What about a low comp peanut 454 with something like a 11-242-3 or similar valve springs and no other mods

  • @donwalsh7521
    @donwalsh7521 2 года назад +2

    Hello Sir, been wondering if you have ever done an apples to oranges test with a small block and big block chevy 427 same spec cam, compression ratio etc. Thanks and Happy Easter.

  • @1stAxelKain
    @1stAxelKain 2 года назад +2

    Just out of curiosity, do you have any recollection of what the old Whipple 454 vortec kit consisted of, blower wise? Since those are "in your dreams" attainable at this point, I was wondering about creating my own with maybe an Eaton M112, or going the other way with a (possibly remote mounted) turbo. This is a hauler/towing truck, so nothing crazy!
    Love your videos, comparisons and commentary!! Especially the Live events you do!

    • @danielcantrill3104
      @danielcantrill3104 2 года назад +1

      Harrop is in the process of building a kit with the 2640 blower for the BBC right now.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +1

      I HAVE SEEN THEM-AND A KENNE BELL UNIT TOO

  • @hardrock719
    @hardrock719 2 года назад +2

    What is your opinion on Rod ratios? I am building a supercharged BBC 540 drag motor I might go with a 6.70 rods. Either going to run 10.0 or 10.5 to 1 comp ratio. Curious if the wrist pain would be too far into the piston?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +1

      I don't feel rod ratio changes much-so I would opt for the right piston design

    • @robertwetherington3372
      @robertwetherington3372 2 года назад

      Never heard of 6.7. 6.135 stock 6.385 is what most 540 have .250 longer even at half inch long 6.635

    • @hardrock719
      @hardrock719 2 года назад

      @@robertwetherington3372 yes they make different lengths for different piston/ rod ratio... you can look up rods at summit racing for the 454 and check out the variations of rod lengths.. ;)

  • @pr0n5tar
    @pr0n5tar 2 года назад +1

    Drats not frist

  • @dondotterer24
    @dondotterer24 2 года назад +1

    Check out JRGuelde videos at my friend's shop. BBC Procharger. 1 video show's the charge hose blowing off moving the dyno. Another shows the results. With a bigger carb it would have made more.

  • @jerameyjockus3871
    @jerameyjockus3871 2 года назад +2

    Am I missing something? What happened to the gen7 8.1 from the first video?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +1

      it doesn't make 800 hp yet

    • @fenatic7484
      @fenatic7484 2 года назад +1

      @@richardholdener1727 I don’t think it would take a huge amount to get 900 hp out of the 8.1 . And an S480 with a T6 volute and a 5 inch exhaust back to two 3 inch pipes side be side to the rear wheel passenger side 3x6 outlet would likely make 900+ with a good intercooler. That would be a real sleeper in 78-81 Malibu, beige with a 3000 stall speed. You’re right 9.5 -9.7 cr would be better on 91, if you were just getting home 87 would get you home. A single with the right cam should have a rising boost curve. Likely no more than 11.5-12 lbs boost.

  • @fenatic7484
    @fenatic7484 2 года назад +1

    What about an S480T6? 9.6:1 cr, 3 inch crossover twin Wastegate single S480 with a T6 volute and a 5 inch exhaust back and down to twin 3 inch pipes back to in front of the righ

  • @joe-hp4nk
    @joe-hp4nk 2 года назад +3

    Test the NA engine with 10:1 , 11:1 , 12:1 compression ratio.

  • @chandlerlofton6536
    @chandlerlofton6536 2 года назад +1

    That ZZ454 would be bad to the bone on the street! It would be a handful on that pro charger though.

  • @gabrielcouch8415
    @gabrielcouch8415 2 года назад +1

    Hey Rich, what bout a torquer series

  • @jerryfuentes8792
    @jerryfuentes8792 2 года назад +1

    I finally got my 6.0

  • @jeffrykopis5468
    @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +1

    On the nitrous 496, what is the reasoning behind the 114 LSA? Is that just for vacuum for power brakes, and a smoother idle, or does nitrous work better with that?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад

      Nitrous just adds to what is there

    • @jeffrykopis5468
      @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад

      @@richardholdener1727 Ok. So why did you choose a 114 LSA rather than 110, 108, etc?

    • @justinfee819
      @justinfee819 2 года назад +1

      That 496 was done in a earlier video as a versatile power adder build he ran it NA, NOS and supercharged that 114 LSA cam was a turbo cam he said also worked good for any power adder but also did well NA.

    • @jeffrykopis5468
      @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +1

      @@justinfee819 Ah, I see. Thanks.

  • @racerd9669
    @racerd9669 2 года назад +1

    Richard, do you ever look at the cranking compression?

  • @theozman38
    @theozman38 2 года назад +1

    Hey Richard. Ya. Yesterday’s live show I told you I get loads from blueprint engines from Kearney Nebraska. It’s true. I said they were 483. Maybe a couple around that displacement but the majority of them are 383’s. The manifest had a lot of them with I think was 850 or 950 brawlers. I hope now I don’t get my truck stolen. 😳😊. Anyway. I wanted to clear that up a little bit.

  • @rexwarren4789
    @rexwarren4789 2 года назад +1

    why o to a week ass shit like that and totally shit small time big block I understand why but let's get it dawg

  • @ChurchAutoTest
    @ChurchAutoTest 2 года назад +1

    Big block question from someone who rarely sees them. Are there any good fuel injection manifolds for these engines? Seems like these combos, as they go higher and higher, are increasingly using carbed setups. Was just wondering if that was out of necessity or convenience.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад

      the Dart tunnel ram has provisions for injectors-we just didn't utilize them-also single planes withe efi are avail

  • @updragracer
    @updragracer 2 года назад +1

    This is good 😎

  • @MrAPCProductions
    @MrAPCProductions 2 года назад +2

    1.5hp/ci on 8.75:1 CR with no power adder...........

    • @fenatic7484
      @fenatic7484 2 года назад

      That is not too shabby really.

  • @Flitzer514
    @Flitzer514 2 года назад +1

    I noticed the power started to dip at 6500 with the tunnel ram BB compared to the single plane intake. Was that due to the runner length of the tunnel ram?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад

      where was the tunnel ram compared to the single plane?

    • @Flitzer514
      @Flitzer514 2 года назад

      @@richardholdener1727 The 540 in the 700 HP video.

  • @jeffrykopis5468
    @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +1

    I'd love to see you build a BB Mopar stroker, between 496 and 520 or so (440 Source has kits), Trick Flow 270 heads, tunnel ram, big stinkin' roller, all that. I'd bet that could reach 800 hp NA as well. Get Dulcich to work on that! 😉

    • @applebitefool
      @applebitefool 2 года назад +2

      Im making 700 hp on a somewhat mild 505 Mopar so 800 is pretty straightforward nowadays. Hell shoot for 950-1000hp 😄

    • @jeffrykopis5468
      @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +1

      @@applebitefool Dyno verified? Cool, what's the combo?

    • @jeffrykopis5468
      @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +1

      @@applebitefool 2hp/ci NA (look at us with our secret language, lol) is pretty impressive for any engine, but can you make it streetable? On pump gas? 🤔

  • @jeffrykopis5468
    @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +1

    Rich, have you tested the 4/7 swap on hi power big blocks like these? Any change?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +2

      no power changes

    • @jondahl3173
      @jondahl3173 2 года назад

      I think it's more about moving heat in the motor away from adjoining cylinders... correct me if I'm wrong.

    • @jeffrykopis5468
      @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад

      @@jondahl3173 Actually, it was supposedy about crankshaft harmonics, but on any engine that's below about 700 hp and 7000 rpm, I don't think that's an issue. I learned from David Vizard that as far as adjacent cylinders robbing each other's charge, the 4/7 swap merely moves the problem from the left rear cylinders to the right front. And I would guess that the exhaust heat issue would too.

  • @BLUUCIFUR
    @BLUUCIFUR 2 года назад +1

    How much for that big block??

  • @johnwehunt4305
    @johnwehunt4305 2 года назад +1

    BIG motor Richard

  • @jeffrykopis5468
    @jeffrykopis5468 2 года назад +1

    Hmm, I'll take a 540 with an 8-71 AND a little nitrous. And maybe meth injection as an intercooler! Cuz ya can't have the nitrous on all the time.

  • @fenatic7484
    @fenatic7484 2 года назад +1

    How about the 8.1 with 10:1 cr 246/ 252 @.050 1.8 rockers with .700/.700 net with 110 LSA and a S480 T6 with a 3 inch crossover. 2 Wastegates electronic controller. A 5 in exhaust from the turbo back and down with a collector to allow a pair of 3 inch pipes side by side to a 3 x 6 oval tip out in front of the rear passenger side rear wheel. Prediction 935 hp 815 ft lbs and very drivable on pump 91 octane. 1.885 per cI with a rising boost curve moderate back pressure and with a solid transmission that you can shift down to 3200 and let the show begin to 6400 with forged rods and 4032 alloy forged pistons with ring gap.Stay on the back side of the throttle and wave at the constabulary as you purr by. lol

    • @kellyheath8547
      @kellyheath8547 2 года назад +1

      I think you need more turbo.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 года назад +2

      for 91 you would be better off with lower compression

    • @fenatic7484
      @fenatic7484 2 года назад

      @@richardholdener1727 How about 9.28.:1? Would you need a larger hot side wheel ! I think there is 96 and a 1.33 a/r . It you were drag racing I would think that you would want it on the two step at 3 lbs boost at 3000 to allow 6.5 when the leverage hits and the front end jumps and be at 9-10 by 60 ft, I would think it would be a fair rate of spool to get clear of the intercooler and fuel and timing regulators for the big show from the 1/8th on without much traction trouble with the front wheels in the air…kind of a 60 ft leapfrog and hard pulling from there on.

  • @martyjohnsonozarkoutdoors8198
    @martyjohnsonozarkoutdoors8198 2 года назад +2

    1

  • @unclesquirrel6951
    @unclesquirrel6951 2 года назад +1

    Personally I blame squirrels