Well done for recognizing the difference between professional studio and audiophile headphones, it's a distinction few reviewers seem to make. I use Adam headphones with my sound desk, they're not my favourite listening headphones but they are extremely accurate and revealing. I love my Audioquest night hawk headphones for just listening to music but they'd be a disaster for mixing and monitoring.
I ended up returning my X55 because at the end of the day they weren't the most agreeable with some of the music I listen to, my HP50 was getting used much more. But I will still to attest to these being great headphones. Ended up getting a 6xx for super cheap and quite like them, but their soundstage is still less than that of the Hi-x55. The Hi-x55 is a detail monster for sure and I will miss that but only ever really reaped the benefit of that with some more complex music that a bit free of bass at least in my case. I certainly look forward to see more of your journey with the Hi-x55. Got a Emu Teak that I also scored for cheap coming tomorrow. Time to see if I've just been a basshead this entire time without realizing it. That midbass punch of the Hi-x55 left me yearning for more bass, it was even a bit frustrating at times in my case and felt like a tease when a song went from midbass to the deeper end only for the X55 to show that in detail only. After all I think I will get another Hi-x55 down the line when the wallet can warrant them and that my music collection becomes expansive enough to have loads of albums that they'd excel with.
Really nice review i can see you put a lot of work into it half of it want over my head but enjoyed your professional review i have the mt5 and my mt8 broke and found them a bit hash but i liked the detail but lacking in warmth and bass and wanted to get another one as i am using the sony mdr 1A it has that deep bass but lacking in detail that i liked from the mt8
love the x55 but no headphone had gave me more pleasure listening to youtube videos/podcast than the Yamaha MT7, just cant put them down, even if its more convenient to listen through the speaker of my surface Laptop
I found that MT8 has good bass texture, not as good as adam audio sp5 but still very good. But my ear touched the inner plastic cone, I sold it years ago. ATH-M70X sounds very similar to MT8 but better comfort. Both have a little too much treble hot spots. But are actually a little darker in the lower treble upper midrange. Both are still slightly raspy, or dry sounding to me. Biggest problem for me on MT8 was small stage. Have not heard NDH20 though, dunno if that plays in a league above them.
And i just finished the X55 series, great stuff man very informative through and through. Thank you. Since i own the K361, how would you compare it for soundstage, tonality and details retrieval ? Have you done the New Light test with the one you had/have ? Just curious to hear what you think in comparison, i'm guessing the X55 is in another league for resolution ? From memory my DT770 had a bit more details already. Have a nice week end man!
The AKG headphones--both the 361 and 371--have very small soundstage, below average. Both headphones are pretty awful with detail retrieval, some of the weakest I've heard so far. There is no comparison between these and the x55.
@@NoThemeReviews hmm, my ears maybe not as good as yours, but i will try the yaxi stpad2s on the mt8 and report back here, since they have some alcantara inside to suck up some of that excessive bass and there’s slightly more space between the ear and driver that might just get rid of that harshness
@@NoThemeReviews mm, another reviewer, Damir franc, also had the same exact comments about the harshness in the sound signature in the mids and highs, and the way he fixed it was to distance the ear from the driver a little bit, he said it eliminated the harshness, so I guess that confirms it, aftermarket pads can save the mt8
I don’t have the Sony and I can’t comment about that. The MT8 has a much drier, harsher sound signature than the 371. The 770 has slightly faster bass than the MT8, and I think is less harsh as well.
@@NoThemeReviews How detailed and resolving is the MT8 compared with the other two? I found the DT-770 more revealing than the 371, but wonder if that is due to its the hollowed out midrange? I am looking for a detailed and revealing headphone but the Hi-X55 is above my current budget.
@@oluvsentmehere6427 The MT8 and 770 have more detail than the 371. The MT8 and 770 have about the same amount of detail. The biggest issue with the MT8 is the harsh vocals.
@@ludwigflatscher2057 I made a few videos about the BTR5. It's a fine product, no better or worse than the cheaper alternatives. People keep saying it has amazing sound quality but they're uninformed schmucks. All you need to know is that I tested the BTR5 against the UP4, ES100, and W3. None of these devices has any audible noise over BT, all easily drive 32 ohm headphones, all have the same BT codecs, all function as USB dacs, all have apps (though the usability of said apps is not consistent). The UP4 and ES100 are the only two that actually offer something unique--the ES100 has the best application with a tremendous amount of customization. The UP4 has the dual dac mode, which allows you to use unbalanced headphones but still get the power output of balanced. In comparison, the BTR5 has a gimmick OLED screen that is difficult to navigate with its laughably small buttons. Its app was at the time I reviewed it hands down the worst of any BT dac. Its power output was not significantly higher than the UP4's. Its form factor was larger than the others. Those who claim that any of these BT devices has "the best" sound quality should be immediately disbelieved. They are not offering any objective analysis, but subjective opinion masked as "fact." All of these devices have slightly different audio tuning, which will affect headphones/IEMs differently, which will be pleasant or unpleasant depending on songs/genre, and the listener's own personal preferences. The BTR5 is yet another Fiio device that is falsely marketed and hyped by shills like Zeos. It is once again another basic product with lipstick that new "audiophiles" continually promote because they 1) have no prior experience with another similar device, 2) have never done actual A/B tests, 3) instill their own personal preferences into the opinions rendered, and 4) lack common sense. I've had many debates with people about the BTR5, some people merely disagreeing, while others were quite vitriolic and abusive. My findings about this expensive, under-delivering, average product have not changed.
Your channel is by far the best at comparison audio reviews. Yamaha will clearly be my replacement closed cans for commuting when Covid ends and my ATHM40X go bust or are gifted. Unless closed back planars get much cheaper. I understand why you pick on companies for their claims on their products but, these are virtually known and accepted truths: - no company accurately presents it's products. - audio companies have basically nothing to say. Every product is the best they can get it to sound in that budget and that type of product. - nobody really cares about what companies say. Specs and reviews are all that matter.
Well, I agree to an extent. Some people know when to spot BS, but that comes from experience. I get questions every day about ideas and beliefs that are downright embarrassing. When I ask these people where they got their understanding of the issue, they always tell me it’s either from reviewers on YT or forum posts. So, clearly, the level of misinformation is rampant. You merely have to look at a random Headfi, Reddit, or Zeos propaganda website post, and you’ll quickly notice people making ridiculous claims about gear they either have no idea how to use or simply voicing uninformed opinions.
@@NoThemeReviews I completely agree the BS should be challenged wherever it is, I guess the writing on the box for an audio product was something I never believed, it just sounded idyllic all the time. It is hard to challenge misinformation since sometimes it is hard to differentiate from actual subjective impressions. After all, if a set of tin cans sound good to someone, then their appreciation might be is genuine.
No doubt. Anything about audio is subjective. There’s no getting around it. You could go with the ASR Winnebago and harp on measurements all day long and listen because you absolutely have to, but that’s a ridiculous way of judging gear. I think the problem really is with reviewers promoting their own personal preferences and becoming a marketing arm for any company that might financially benefit them. I don’t have a problem with reviewers who say their recommendation is based upon the sound signature they prefer-that’s legit. But they hide that opinion behind a facade of “professionalism”. Their refusal to properly test, compare, and hold companies accountable is blatantly obvious. So, in my book, it’s getting near impossible to find meaningful reviews of products. It’s a shame.
@@NoThemeReviews There is nothing incorrect or wrong about the ASR train, the mistake is the errors interpreting the measurement data in respect of what is right for you to buy. If you use the measurement as a basis to extrapolate your preferences through comparison, you'll probably end up with a collection of hardware that you like. Fundamentally, it should be recognised that the human ear is a poor measurement instrument, and therefore pretty useless as a reference tool. Using the ASR data (or any data, bear in mind that ASR is generally one data source, not multiple testers comparing results and calculating overall uncertainty) as a reference to make a more informed choice of hardware is arguably the most pragmatic approach. I do agree that many of dazzled ASR disciples believe that good measurement = good sound, and that misses a huge variation in personal response curves. Even Sean Olive acknowledges that the Harman Curve makes some pretty big assumptions about individual physiology! I love my Grado headphones, but I won't try and convince anyone that they are the "truth", because it's easy to prove they're not! The majority of AST=R subscribers will tell you that all Grado phones sound rubbish, simply because they don't measure well, and missing the entire point if whether its fun the listen with them or not. However, I'm of the view that you can usually EQ your way to a good tonal response, but detail retrieval is fixed. On this basis, as I'm searching for a mid priced closed back, the X55 is ahead of the MT8 on my shipping list.
I’m not sure I understand your setup. I assume you’ve got an audio interface to your PC and want to use the HD as your headphone output. In which case: connect both products via their USB cables to your PC. In your audio recording software, select your interface as the mic input and the HD as the sound output.
@@NoThemeReviews Ahhh... I get your question. Yes, so I am attempting to monitor audio while mixing. However, my Hi-X55 are not providing what I feel to be an honest representation of the lows & subs. So, I am attempting to find a way to compensate (hopefully by providing an added implement to my headphone monitors... It'd suck to have to go and get another set right now).
The x55 has rolled off sub bass and very fast transience. In this regard it is not neutral and will not provide a complete representation of your bass mix.
I’m not a professional so I can’t give an opinion about what might be good for that particular application. But, if you want neutral and natural presentation, especially in bass, then you should look at the OLLO S4X. The HD650/6xx is also a good option, though its mids are not neutral and rather pushed forward. If you just want something that’s affordable and gives a fair approximation of neutral sound, then look at the Monoprice HR5.
I was listening to my x55 thinking man this is a very very flat hp, then i realised my glasses were breaking the seal. Took my glasses off, completely different sound.
@@Othmar98 the biggest difference is in the midrange tho, before i took my glasses off, the midrange sounded quite lean to me. Bass gets affected too but the difference is not as great, maybe 2 or 3 dbs at most. This bass is unboosted on this hp, sealed or not.
@@NoThemeReviews yes it is bass lean but with glasses on it sounds like it has no bass. Thats why I was underwhelmed. I tried again without glasses and now they sound normal!
It's a shame you were not able to do some objective instrument testing as well as subjective, as HRTF is real so what sounds raspy and harsh to you might not to me, and as always, all phones need EQ for audio playback and having an FR curve is really helpful.
That’s pretty lame. Go to B&H, Zzounds, Vintage King, or Sweetwater. I’ve purchased from all of them and they all have great customer service. I’m sure one of them will ship to you.
There’s only so much B-roll I can record. Besides, the channel is about reviewing audio gear, which requires far more effort and description than the typical 5-10 videos showing off products to get the clicks. Sorry if the video shots are repetitive but there’s really no getting around it.
@@NoThemeReviews Funny! Yesterday I asked for this Comparison and there it is. I do almost totally agree with all that you say about the Hi X 55. But I personally find the Bass absolutely Great! Only 2 db more in 32Hz and 1-2 more in 64Hz and the Bass is for everything Perfect for me. But most of the Times I even do not Touch the EQ. THX for your Great work. What do you think about the Monoprice 1060c, maybee with an Open mod?
I’ve never heard the mod. The 1060c is still a very good headphone, but it is not going to be around much longer. Monolith is going to phase out the M1060 with the closed back variants of the recent 1070 and 1570. It was supposed to happen this year, but the pandemic is playing havoc on a lot of companies. In light of that, I think the 1060c is a bit overpriced at this stage. If you can find them for about $150, then I think they are a good bargain for typical planar bass transience, average detail and separation, and about average clarity.
@@NoThemeReviews THX for your Statement. The mod is easy to do and makes them open. I could get them for 210€, but I think I will wait or do not order them at all. Do you have the Hi X 50 allready? I am very curious again what you have to say about them.
well.......yamaha are 850 ron to me.......x55 no less than 1439!.....1euro=5ron almost........ I have an offer rite now on a site (where one can buy and sell) at 500 ron!......just one......dunno why.......(new).......not that a professional should think like that.......
Well done for recognizing the difference between professional studio and audiophile headphones, it's a distinction few reviewers seem to make. I use Adam headphones with my sound desk, they're not my favourite listening headphones but they are extremely accurate and revealing. I love my Audioquest night hawk headphones for just listening to music but they'd be a disaster for mixing and monitoring.
I ended up returning my X55 because at the end of the day they weren't the most agreeable with some of the music I listen to, my HP50 was getting used much more. But I will still to attest to these being great headphones. Ended up getting a 6xx for super cheap and quite like them, but their soundstage is still less than that of the Hi-x55. The Hi-x55 is a detail monster for sure and I will miss that but only ever really reaped the benefit of that with some more complex music that a bit free of bass at least in my case.
I certainly look forward to see more of your journey with the Hi-x55. Got a Emu Teak that I also scored for cheap coming tomorrow. Time to see if I've just been a basshead this entire time without realizing it. That midbass punch of the Hi-x55 left me yearning for more bass, it was even a bit frustrating at times in my case and felt like a tease when a song went from midbass to the deeper end only for the X55 to show that in detail only. After all I think I will get another Hi-x55 down the line when the wallet can warrant them and that my music collection becomes expansive enough to have loads of albums that they'd excel with.
Really nice review i can see you put a lot of work into it half of it want over my head but enjoyed your professional review i have the mt5 and my mt8 broke and found them a bit hash but i liked the detail but lacking in warmth and bass and wanted to get another one as i am using the sony mdr 1A it has that deep bass but lacking in detail that i liked from the mt8
love the x55 but no headphone had gave me more pleasure listening to youtube videos/podcast than the Yamaha MT7, just cant put them down, even if its more convenient to listen through the speaker of my surface Laptop
I found that MT8 has good bass texture, not as good as adam audio sp5 but still very good. But my ear touched the inner plastic cone, I sold it years ago. ATH-M70X sounds very similar to MT8 but better comfort. Both have a little too much treble hot spots. But are actually a little darker in the lower treble upper midrange. Both are still slightly raspy, or dry sounding to me. Biggest problem for me on MT8 was small stage. Have not heard NDH20 though, dunno if that plays in a league above them.
And i just finished the X55 series, great stuff man very informative through and through. Thank you.
Since i own the K361, how would you compare it for soundstage, tonality and details retrieval ? Have you done the New Light test with the one you had/have ? Just curious to hear what you think in comparison, i'm guessing the X55 is in another league for resolution ? From memory my DT770 had a bit more details already.
Have a nice week end man!
The AKG headphones--both the 361 and 371--have very small soundstage, below average. Both headphones are pretty awful with detail retrieval, some of the weakest I've heard so far. There is no comparison between these and the x55.
Just wondering, are this the wired version or the bluetooth ones?@@NoThemeReviews
@@avishekghatak2176 Wired
@@avishekghatak2176 x15 are more or less x25BT
I ve bought 2 MT8 from 2018 and is good enough for my bad ears...
If you still reply? Would aftermarket earpads get rid of the harshness and melding from the mt8?
Possibly
@@NoThemeReviews hmm, my ears maybe not as good as yours, but i will try the yaxi stpad2s on the mt8 and report back here, since they have some alcantara inside to suck up some of that excessive bass and there’s slightly more space between the ear and driver that might just get rid of that harshness
@@NoThemeReviews mm, another reviewer, Damir franc, also had the same exact comments about the harshness in the sound signature in the mids and highs, and the way he fixed it was to distance the ear from the driver a little bit, he said it eliminated the harshness, so I guess that confirms it, aftermarket pads can save the mt8
I have the yaxi and the comfort and even the sound is better the inside cup has front and rear different acoustic so a better sound
How does the Yamaha MT8 compare with popular headphones like Beyerdynamic DT-770, AKG K371 and Sony 7506? I have tried out the DT-770 and K371.
I don’t have the Sony and I can’t comment about that. The MT8 has a much drier, harsher sound signature than the 371. The 770 has slightly faster bass than the MT8, and I think is less harsh as well.
@@NoThemeReviews How detailed and resolving is the MT8 compared with the other two? I found the DT-770 more revealing than the 371, but wonder if that is due to its the hollowed out midrange?
I am looking for a detailed and revealing headphone but the Hi-X55 is above my current budget.
@@oluvsentmehere6427 The MT8 and 770 have more detail than the 371. The MT8 and 770 have about the same amount of detail. The biggest issue with the MT8 is the harsh vocals.
@@NoThemeReviews What do you think about the hyped Fioo Btr 5 Receiver?
@@ludwigflatscher2057 I made a few videos about the BTR5. It's a fine product, no better or worse than the cheaper alternatives. People keep saying it has amazing sound quality but they're uninformed schmucks. All you need to know is that I tested the BTR5 against the UP4, ES100, and W3. None of these devices has any audible noise over BT, all easily drive 32 ohm headphones, all have the same BT codecs, all function as USB dacs, all have apps (though the usability of said apps is not consistent). The UP4 and ES100 are the only two that actually offer something unique--the ES100 has the best application with a tremendous amount of customization. The UP4 has the dual dac mode, which allows you to use unbalanced headphones but still get the power output of balanced.
In comparison, the BTR5 has a gimmick OLED screen that is difficult to navigate with its laughably small buttons. Its app was at the time I reviewed it hands down the worst of any BT dac. Its power output was not significantly higher than the UP4's. Its form factor was larger than the others.
Those who claim that any of these BT devices has "the best" sound quality should be immediately disbelieved. They are not offering any objective analysis, but subjective opinion masked as "fact." All of these devices have slightly different audio tuning, which will affect headphones/IEMs differently, which will be pleasant or unpleasant depending on songs/genre, and the listener's own personal preferences.
The BTR5 is yet another Fiio device that is falsely marketed and hyped by shills like Zeos. It is once again another basic product with lipstick that new "audiophiles" continually promote because they 1) have no prior experience with another similar device, 2) have never done actual A/B tests, 3) instill their own personal preferences into the opinions rendered, and 4) lack common sense.
I've had many debates with people about the BTR5, some people merely disagreeing, while others were quite vitriolic and abusive. My findings about this expensive, under-delivering, average product have not changed.
Your channel is by far the best at comparison audio reviews. Yamaha will clearly be my replacement closed cans for commuting when Covid ends and my ATHM40X go bust or are gifted. Unless closed back planars get much cheaper.
I understand why you pick on companies for their claims on their products but, these are virtually known and accepted truths:
- no company accurately presents it's products.
- audio companies have basically nothing to say. Every product is the best they can get it to sound in that budget and that type of product.
- nobody really cares about what companies say. Specs and reviews are all that matter.
Well, I agree to an extent. Some people know when to spot BS, but that comes from experience. I get questions every day about ideas and beliefs that are downright embarrassing. When I ask these people where they got their understanding of the issue, they always tell me it’s either from reviewers on YT or forum posts. So, clearly, the level of misinformation is rampant. You merely have to look at a random Headfi, Reddit, or Zeos propaganda website post, and you’ll quickly notice people making ridiculous claims about gear they either have no idea how to use or simply voicing uninformed opinions.
@@NoThemeReviews I completely agree the BS should be challenged wherever it is, I guess the writing on the box for an audio product was something I never believed, it just sounded idyllic all the time.
It is hard to challenge misinformation since sometimes it is hard to differentiate from actual subjective impressions. After all, if a set of tin cans sound good to someone, then their appreciation might be is genuine.
No doubt. Anything about audio is subjective. There’s no getting around it. You could go with the ASR Winnebago and harp on measurements all day long and listen because you absolutely have to, but that’s a ridiculous way of judging gear. I think the problem really is with reviewers promoting their own personal preferences and becoming a marketing arm for any company that might financially benefit them. I don’t have a problem with reviewers who say their recommendation is based upon the sound signature they prefer-that’s legit. But they hide that opinion behind a facade of “professionalism”. Their refusal to properly test, compare, and hold companies accountable is blatantly obvious. So, in my book, it’s getting near impossible to find meaningful reviews of products. It’s a shame.
@@NoThemeReviews There is nothing incorrect or wrong about the ASR train, the mistake is the errors interpreting the measurement data in respect of what is right for you to buy. If you use the measurement as a basis to extrapolate your preferences through comparison, you'll probably end up with a collection of hardware that you like. Fundamentally, it should be recognised that the human ear is a poor measurement instrument, and therefore pretty useless as a reference tool. Using the ASR data (or any data, bear in mind that ASR is generally one data source, not multiple testers comparing results and calculating overall uncertainty) as a reference to make a more informed choice of hardware is arguably the most pragmatic approach. I do agree that many of dazzled ASR disciples believe that good measurement = good sound, and that misses a huge variation in personal response curves. Even Sean Olive acknowledges that the Harman Curve makes some pretty big assumptions about individual physiology! I love my Grado headphones, but I won't try and convince anyone that they are the "truth", because it's easy to prove they're not! The majority of AST=R subscribers will tell you that all Grado phones sound rubbish, simply because they don't measure well, and missing the entire point if whether its fun the listen with them or not.
However, I'm of the view that you can usually EQ your way to a good tonal response, but detail retrieval is fixed. On this basis, as I'm searching for a mid priced closed back, the X55 is ahead of the MT8 on my shipping list.
How do we use the hip dac on X55 when mixing with interface through interface (not being smart alec... i'm new to this)
I’m not sure I understand your setup. I assume you’ve got an audio interface to your PC and want to use the HD as your headphone output. In which case: connect both products via their USB cables to your PC. In your audio recording software, select your interface as the mic input and the HD as the sound output.
@@NoThemeReviews Ahhh... I get your question. Yes, so I am attempting to monitor audio while mixing. However, my Hi-X55 are not providing what I feel to be an honest representation of the lows & subs. So, I am attempting to find a way to compensate (hopefully by providing an added implement to my headphone monitors... It'd suck to have to go and get another set right now).
The x55 has rolled off sub bass and very fast transience. In this regard it is not neutral and will not provide a complete representation of your bass mix.
@@NoThemeReviews Which are your most trusted three (sub-$500) headphone monitors for honest representation when mixing?
I’m not a professional so I can’t give an opinion about what might be good for that particular application. But, if you want neutral and natural presentation, especially in bass, then you should look at the OLLO S4X. The HD650/6xx is also a good option, though its mids are not neutral and rather pushed forward. If you just want something that’s affordable and gives a fair approximation of neutral sound, then look at the Monoprice HR5.
I was listening to my x55 thinking man this is a very very flat hp, then i realised my glasses were breaking the seal. Took my glasses off, completely different sound.
Interesting! I was test listening to a pair of them yesterday and also got underwhelmed by the bass! I will try again today without glasses.
Lol. I’ve been saying the x55 is bass lean. Add a few dB of bass. That will do the trick.
@@Othmar98 the biggest difference is in the midrange tho, before i took my glasses off, the midrange sounded quite lean to me. Bass gets affected too but the difference is not as great, maybe 2 or 3 dbs at most. This bass is unboosted on this hp, sealed or not.
@@Othmar98 if you have an es100, try the "deep" preset in the eq settings.
@@NoThemeReviews yes it is bass lean but with glasses on it sounds like it has no bass. Thats why I was underwhelmed. I tried again without glasses and now they sound normal!
Can you start making LCD XC vs m1060 closed sound comparison??
It's a shame you were not able to do some objective instrument testing as well as subjective, as HRTF is real so what sounds raspy and harsh to you might not to me, and as always, all phones need EQ for audio playback and having an FR curve is really helpful.
I've heard the cheaper yamaha mt5 is better than the 8 hmm
Amazon won't ship the Austrian Audio headphone to Hawaii. T_T
That’s pretty lame. Go to B&H, Zzounds, Vintage King, or Sweetwater. I’ve purchased from all of them and they all have great customer service. I’m sure one of them will ship to you.
@@NoThemeReviews Thanks. Ordered from B&H. Sorry, tried to give you credit on Amazon but that was a no-go.
No problem. Hope you enjoy the headphones. B&H has a great return policy so don’t hesitate to chat with them if the headphones aren’t to your liking.
They don't ship them to Austria either. I kid you not!
Okay........ You've been doing Austrian Audio Hi-X55 reviews for 2 weeks now. You can stop showing the unboxing!
There’s only so much B-roll I can record. Besides, the channel is about reviewing audio gear, which requires far more effort and description than the typical 5-10 videos showing off products to get the clicks. Sorry if the video shots are repetitive but there’s really no getting around it.
@@NoThemeReviews Funny! Yesterday I asked for this Comparison and there it is. I do almost totally agree with all that you say about the Hi X 55. But I personally find the Bass absolutely Great! Only 2 db more in 32Hz and 1-2 more in 64Hz and the Bass is for everything Perfect for me. But most of the Times I even do not Touch the EQ. THX for your Great work. What do you think about the Monoprice 1060c, maybee with an Open mod?
I’ve never heard the mod. The 1060c is still a very good headphone, but it is not going to be around much longer. Monolith is going to phase out the M1060 with the closed back variants of the recent 1070 and 1570. It was supposed to happen this year, but the pandemic is playing havoc on a lot of companies. In light of that, I think the 1060c is a bit overpriced at this stage. If you can find them for about $150, then I think they are a good bargain for typical planar bass transience, average detail and separation, and about average clarity.
@@NoThemeReviews THX for your Statement. The mod is easy to do and makes them open. I could get them for 210€, but I think I will wait or do not order them at all. Do you have the Hi X 50 allready? I am very curious again what you have to say about them.
@@ludwigflatscher2057 Yes, I uploaded an x50 comparison this morning.
well.......yamaha are 850 ron to me.......x55 no less than 1439!.....1euro=5ron almost........
I have an offer rite now on a site (where one can buy and sell) at 500 ron!......just one......dunno why.......(new).......not that a professional should think like that.......
MT8 looks like spitting image of M50x.
Yeah but the bass response sucks tbh...
On the x55? Absolutely