I believe Diana had some strong narcissistic traits & that's where Harry gets his from. All narcissists can "act" charitable. They care tremendously about their image. Some are more covert about it than Meghan Markel.
@wynn1587 Diana was as much a sociopath as she was an empath! You need to research the unbelievably nasty things she did to people in her private life! She was a very cruel and vindictive woman in private. Of course she also had her good side!
Anne completely agree I bet if Diana had not married her prince she would not have done any charitable work like a lot of people do without the standing ovation and round of applause she got and lapped up
Same I really love listening to Lady C❤️ I just thought to myself, right before I saw your comment, if this was a “cut out” from the original upload?! And according to your comment I feel my thoughts have been answered. Thank you so much 🙏 I wish you a happy week 🙏💫 Take care and of yourself and your loved ones 🌼
Andrew Morton has been the thorn in the Wales's skin. He Stoked the fire n rubbed salt into wounds that any young couple do have. Had it not for this horrible man Prince Charles n Diana would have never separated. So glad that lady C is telling it all. Prince Charles is kind and refined. He does not deserve this negative image.
Diana and Charles informally separated in 1986 when Charles discovered Diana was in love and involved with her bodyguard Barry Mannakee. Charles ended their intimate relationship to avoid any possibility of Diana having a child by another man and passing the child off as an heir to the throne. That would be high treason. Andrew Morton's book was based on the tapes Diana recorded for him. Diana said what she wanted people to believe, and it was extremely biased and one-sided and not fully truthful. In an interview, Andrew Morton made a point to say that the book was "Diana's Story" and not necessarily truthful. 1992 was a bad year for Diana. Her father was ill and died. She was at odds with her family. Her affair with James Hewitt ended. She wasn't happy. I suspect Diana was very jealous of Charles and Camilla's happiness. Charles renewed his intimate relationship with Camilla after ending his intimate relationship with Diana in 1986. The Queen and Prince Philip had a stern talk with Diana after her 1992 tell-all book was published. They asked her to think about what she was doing to the monarchy and William's future. Diana and Charles officially separated in 1992. Philip corresponded with Diana trying to encourage her to be loyal to the monarchy. Philip stopped speaking to Diana after her 1995 BBC Panorama interview. Diana's BBC interview prompted the queen to request the divorce. Diana's 1995 BBC Panorama interview was intended to undermine Charles and destroy his reputation. At the time, Diana's reputation was tarnished by the tabloid reports of her affairs. Diana was labeled a home wrecker in the tabloids. Diana had EIGHT or more affairs before the divorce was final. FOUR of her affairs were with married men. NONE of Diana's affairs were successful long-term relationships. She had difficulty establishing and sustaining personal relationships.
I liked they way you conducted the entire interview. IMO LCC is honest, Still maintains a sense of humor, possesses some valuable depth and wisdom. She is a product of her upbringing and is a bit rigid in areas, but that is not a fault. She is fun!!
Quentin Crisp was eloquent in what he said about Diana. His words are availabe on Google. His final words were, "The vulgarity is overpowering." God Save King Charles and Queen Camilla.
If everything was handled above-board, there may not have been a William and Harry. Charles was forced to marry in order to produce an heir and a spare. Diana was selected as the mare, to bear both heir and spare. That is the reality of the situation. Diana was also forced to proceed. Once Charles said "whatever "in love" means," that's when Diana should have been able to call the wedding off, if she was unwilling to look the other way. She was aware enough of Charles' feelings for Camilla Parker Bowles, that one of her older family members should have asked her point blank, whether or not the role of "long suffering wife" was one that she was prepared to play. They did not, since they wanted the prestige associated with being related by marriage to the Royal Family, possibly even more than Diana did. Given her age and given the times, both the eating disorder and affairs were understandable. I think if they had it to do over, it would have been handled differently, and there wouldn't be a William and a Harry.
Diana’s dress gave it away, she was a naive young girl who thought marrying a Prince and becoming a princess was a fairytale come true, unfortunately reality hit and she wasn’t prepared.
@ First of all, Madam, Diana was too young to know what love was. She may have been in love with the idea of love, especially with a Prince destined to be King, of all people, but she had not even known Charles for long by the time they became engaged, let alone spent sufficient time with him, to be able to fall in love. Once Charles told the media interviewer "whatever in love means," that is when, with her family's full backing, Diana should have been able to call off the wedding.
@@davidhoward2487 Yes, I believe that Diana did know what her "historical" role was to be, but she was too young, and too emotionally immature to have been expected to make a concerted choice to go along, which meant "forever holding her peace." Royal Family or not, as a parent, I would NEVER have allowed my daughter to marry a man who said "whatever in love means," because THAT meant "NO," no matter how you look at it!
I don’t know if this is true or not, but I heard marrying Diana was not what Charles wanted. It was what Elizabeth II wanted. That could be the only reason Margaret and Anne were married off to their ex husbands.
Yes, Diana was beautiful ❤️ Yes, Diana’s story is very sad, but she learned how to play the game. Diana turned crazy and vengeful when she could NOT make Charles love her! She wanted to destroy Charles! Diana played a very dangerous game with very high stakes involved. And then the car accident happened…. Very often in life, truth is stranger than fiction.
I know everyone raises Diana to saint heights but I always found her to be the perpetually whiney, weak, pouting opportunist. Even the way people blame Charles only fir their marriage debacle shows how no one holds Diana, not even herself, accountable for her part in this. He married someone he didn't love. She married someone she knew didn't love her. I'm not sure which is worse. Most times I think the latter. She became the most photographed woman in the world, after all. If the genders were exactly reversed we wouldn't be applauding the younger guy who married an older famous rich woman who he knew didn't love him, but in turn got an enormous amount of fame and money out of the deal.
I think there is fault on both sides. She knew what she was getting into as she is of the aristocracy. The day before her wedding she was happy she wad marrying Charles.
Diana was human and a kind heart Though Lady C tells how it is I saw the full interview Very honest and balanced God bless To All that commented And the story interviewer well done
Seeing the articles about Diana, there are lots of sympathy towards her. I know their marriage ruined both of her and Charles souls but when I see Diana's interview I feel like she's projecting this meek demeanor and always putting Charles in the bad light in a causal manner, which is a manipulative behaviour. She knows that she could win people's heart if she shows them that's she's the victim.
I never thought you were controversial. You portrait the best there is in the British aristocracy. I had a friend like you years ago and learnt then how different our cultures were.
It’s simple. The Queen said to Charles you must find a non- commoner that’s a virgin and get married and have heirs to the thrown. So Charles still hung onto Camilla and deceived and tricked Diane an 18 year old girl and simply used her and caused her much pain - he used her as a breeder. Simple to explain and a horrible thing to do to such a sweet, kind, loving, good natured teenager
I would like to point out, that like myself, married at 19 but became 20 in the same year. I married for love having become engaged at 17. But she was gauche and uneducated, Charles was educated, had very strong ideas and was a more cultured person. But the family wanted him to marry a virgin and she fitted the bill. But it doesn't make any difference because all of the queen's children, except Charles, all married non virgins. And apart from Edward, who has remained in a faithfull loving marriage to a woman who has adapted very well to the Royal life and us a good representative for the Royal family.
THROWN! You mean throne! The rest of your post is equally off the mark , in fact its a tissue of lies, Diana was 20 when they married. She caused mire pain to the wives and children if the several men she bedded, including the suicide of James Gilbeys fiancée. Do some research.Diana admitted to being the first to have an affair, before William was a year old.
Of course Diana had a lover because Charles was seeing Camilla. She was scorned. If Charles had loved her she wouldn't have strayed. He should have been honest with her. . She was
I don't think she wants to go from royal family she just need space and she gives them all time to decide don't forget she has too boys and she was young and she can't played that dirty game her problems wasn't with royal family her problems more than that
Oh, boy ... the Queen's marriage was NOT a very very happy marriage ... Andrew is not a child from her husband and apparently Phillip has children strewn around the globe from his various dalliances.
Stepmother in law...what a stretch to keep a link to a defunct marriage. She fancies herself having been chosen as a better mate, by Charles. Didn't happen, but the fascination and fantasy was there. Charity could have used this energetic obsession. But upon tasting the bucks, she was hooked.It was a position of power.Hopped on the wave and championed the controversial ...sitting on Diamond mine. Not dynamite.
This Rob Moore using Lady C for subscription. People won't fall for that. Most "unintelligent " thing to do. Lady c should not have granted you this interview you are airing in piece...in bits.
DW was 20 when she married CW. He lied and used her for his own ends. I would have stayed married to CW simply to keep my family together. I would have told CW he could have Cami, but not both us! She could have focused on her children and charities. Leave CW to his own devices. I think DE had high hopes for her marr, but when
I don't believe Charles lied to Diana at all she lied to herself! Diana said that when they were dating he was stand offish! He didn't lead her on. But he did make an enormous effort to make the marriage work. Whilst Diana seemed to think her role was to be adored!
She is a woman.... she has never been a man.... look at pictures of her from her younger days... she was a beautiful model. Better looking than you I can guarantee but life has shown me it's generally only jealous fuglies who comment on peoples looks.
![ATEEZ(에이티즈) - [GOLDEN HOUR : Part.2] Preview](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X4PfgRPBUVo/mqdefault.jpg)
Loooove Lady C .. people don't like her because she says it as it is ... she always has proof to back her up.
I believe Diana had some strong narcissistic traits & that's where Harry gets his from. All narcissists can "act" charitable. They care tremendously about their image. Some are more covert about it than Meghan Markel.
@wynn1587 Diana was as much a sociopath as she was an empath!
You need to research the unbelievably nasty things she did to people in her private life!
She was a very cruel and vindictive woman in private. Of course she also had her good side!
Harry is his mother's son not terribly inteilgant and revengful
Agree 100%
Anne completely agree I bet if Diana had not married her prince she would not have done any charitable work like a lot of people do without the standing ovation and round of applause she got and lapped up
Finally someone sees it.
Lady C is a very wise woman. She's strong, compassionate and does her homework, hence high integrity. In my view and my hubby's view.
She's a sharp lady. She had a narcissistic mother so she can pick up on people with personality disorders.
I watched this (the full version) the other evening, and found it EXCELLENT! 👌💪
Same I really love listening to Lady C❤️
I just thought to myself, right before I saw your comment, if this was a “cut out” from the original upload?!
And according to your comment I feel my thoughts have been answered. Thank you so much 🙏
I wish you a happy week 🙏💫 Take care and of yourself and your loved ones 🌼
Yes totally enjoyed it very balanced
Lady C is brilliant, I could listen to her all day, absolutely fascinating #
Totally BORING. SHE TALKS OF HERSELF
@@Grace.allovertheplace 🤗😍💐🥰
Lady C is honest and trustworthy, smart, and very careful. She is a rarity in this day and age .
Shes brutally honest
Lady C is magnificent & she says what she feels, she also tells the truth.
If you know truth you get shocked
Lol no she gives her opinion ... I don't think Diana would have let her confidence in this person !
Lady C defends RF. She is a part of Camilla PR team
Andrew Morton has been the thorn in the Wales's skin. He Stoked the fire n rubbed salt into wounds that any young couple do have. Had it not for this horrible man Prince Charles n Diana would have never separated. So glad that lady C is telling it all. Prince Charles is kind and refined. He does not deserve this negative image.
Wow! Put the bong down before you comment!
Diana and Charles informally separated in 1986 when Charles discovered Diana was in love and involved with her bodyguard Barry Mannakee. Charles ended their intimate relationship to avoid any possibility of Diana having a child by another man and passing the child off as an heir to the throne. That would be high treason.
Andrew Morton's book was based on the tapes Diana recorded for him. Diana said what she wanted people to believe, and it was extremely biased and one-sided and not fully truthful.
In an interview, Andrew Morton made a point to say that the book was "Diana's Story" and not necessarily truthful.
1992 was a bad year for Diana. Her father was ill and died. She was at odds with her family. Her affair with James Hewitt ended. She wasn't happy. I suspect Diana was very jealous of Charles and Camilla's happiness. Charles renewed his intimate relationship with Camilla after ending his intimate relationship with Diana in 1986.
The Queen and Prince Philip had a stern talk with Diana after her 1992 tell-all book was published. They asked her to think about what she was doing to the monarchy and William's future. Diana and Charles officially separated in 1992.
Philip corresponded with Diana trying to encourage her to be loyal to the monarchy. Philip stopped speaking to Diana after her 1995 BBC Panorama interview. Diana's BBC interview prompted the queen to request the divorce.
Diana's 1995 BBC Panorama interview was intended to undermine Charles and destroy his reputation. At the time, Diana's reputation was tarnished by the tabloid reports of her affairs. Diana was labeled a home wrecker in the tabloids. Diana had EIGHT or more affairs before the divorce was final. FOUR of her affairs were with married men. NONE of Diana's affairs were successful long-term relationships. She had difficulty establishing and sustaining personal relationships.
She is brilliant.
I liked they way you conducted the entire interview. IMO LCC is honest, Still maintains a sense of humor, possesses some valuable depth and wisdom. She is a product of her upbringing and is a bit rigid in areas, but that is not a fault. She is fun!!
Quentin Crisp was eloquent in what he said about Diana. His words are availabe on Google. His final words were, "The vulgarity is overpowering." God Save King Charles and Queen Camilla.
I read her book, and she is Very measured!!💐👑
If everything was handled above-board, there may not have been a William and Harry. Charles was forced to marry in order to produce an heir and a spare. Diana was selected as the mare, to bear both heir and spare. That is the reality of the situation.
Diana was also forced to proceed. Once Charles said "whatever "in love" means," that's when Diana should have been able to call the wedding off, if she was unwilling to look the other way. She was aware enough of Charles' feelings for Camilla Parker Bowles, that one of her older family members should have asked her point blank, whether or not the role of "long suffering wife" was one that she was prepared to play. They did not, since they wanted the prestige associated with being related by marriage to the Royal Family, possibly even more than Diana did.
Given her age and given the times, both the eating disorder and affairs were understandable. I think if they had it to do over, it would have been handled differently, and there wouldn't be a William and a Harry.
Sad but true. No one wanted to be in that marriage.
Diana’s dress gave it away, she was a naive young girl who thought marrying a Prince and becoming a princess was a fairytale come true, unfortunately reality hit and she wasn’t prepared.
@ First of all, Madam, Diana was too young to know what love was. She may have been in love with the idea of love, especially with a Prince destined to be King, of all people, but she had not even known Charles for long by the time they became engaged, let alone spent sufficient time with him, to be able to fall in love.
Once Charles told the media interviewer "whatever in love means," that is when, with her family's full backing, Diana should have been able to call off the wedding.
@@factualbreakdown3072 In fact, Diana knew, they all mingled as children...she had a crush on Charles, and he was dating her sister!...
@@davidhoward2487 Yes, I believe that Diana did know what her "historical" role was to be, but she was too young, and too emotionally immature to have been expected to make a concerted choice to go along, which meant "forever holding her peace."
Royal Family or not, as a parent, I would NEVER have allowed my daughter to marry a man who said "whatever in love means," because THAT meant "NO," no matter how you look at it!
Class act. True upper class ideology. Lady C is an inspiration to me.
You should be commended for your courage.
❤️Lady C
I don’t know if this is true or not, but I heard marrying Diana was not what Charles wanted. It was what Elizabeth II wanted. That could be the only reason Margaret and Anne were married off to their ex husbands.
The Queen Mother wanted this marriage. The queen Mother was friends with Diana’s Step Grandmother. The both of them arranged the marriage.
Yes, Diana was beautiful ❤️
Yes, Diana’s story is very sad, but she learned how to play the game.
Diana turned crazy and vengeful when she could NOT make Charles love her!
She wanted to destroy Charles!
Diana played a very dangerous game with very high stakes involved.
And then the car accident happened….
Very often in life, truth is stranger than fiction.
Diana was NUTS!
True
Well said
Diana was coo-coo nuts
Stay compassionate…it will come back to you one day. It’s called karma.
I know everyone raises Diana to saint heights but I always found her to be the perpetually whiney, weak, pouting opportunist. Even the way people blame Charles only fir their marriage debacle shows how no one holds Diana, not even herself, accountable for her part in this. He married someone he didn't love. She married someone she knew didn't love her. I'm not sure which is worse. Most times I think the latter. She became the most photographed woman in the world, after all. If the genders were exactly reversed we wouldn't be applauding the younger guy who married an older famous rich woman who he knew didn't love him, but in turn got an enormous amount of fame and money out of the deal.
👎🏻🤮
I agree.
Absolutely true.
I think there is fault on both sides. She knew what she was getting into as she is of the aristocracy. The day before her wedding she was happy she wad marrying Charles.
Had Diana not married a prince no one would have known her .she would be working part time and living of her parents money.
Di was also leading ppl on all the time
I think it’s fair to say she was manipulative.
@@AJ-hi9fd yes as much as I Love her I would say absolutely right
Diana was human and a kind heart
Though Lady C tells how it is
I saw the full interview
Very honest and balanced
God bless
To All that commented
And the story interviewer well done
Seeing the articles about Diana, there are lots of sympathy towards her. I know their marriage ruined both of her and Charles souls but when I see Diana's interview I feel like she's projecting this meek demeanor and always putting Charles in the bad light in a causal manner, which is a manipulative behaviour. She knows that she could win people's heart if she shows them that's she's the victim.
Lady C is gorgeous and snart and classy
Classy? Proper ghetto
Your castle is your driving force !
When she said Dickie Attenbour, did she mean Richard Attenborough??
Hallo, It wasn't very clear but I think she was talking about this person: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickie_Arbiter
I never thought you were controversial. You portrait the best there is in the British aristocracy. I had a friend like you years ago and learnt then how different our cultures were.
It’s simple. The Queen said to Charles you must find a non- commoner that’s a virgin and get married and have heirs to the thrown. So Charles still hung onto Camilla and deceived and tricked Diane an 18 year old girl and simply used her and caused her much pain - he used her as a breeder. Simple to explain and a horrible thing to do to such a sweet, kind, loving, good natured teenager
PS the royals suck
I would like to point out, that like myself, married at 19 but became 20 in the same year. I married for love having become engaged at 17. But she was gauche and uneducated, Charles was educated, had very strong ideas and was a more cultured person. But the family wanted him to marry a virgin and she fitted the bill. But it doesn't make any difference because all of the queen's children, except Charles, all married non virgins. And apart from Edward, who has remained in a faithfull loving marriage to a woman who has adapted very well to the Royal life and us a good representative for the Royal family.
THROWN! You mean throne! The rest of your post is equally off the mark , in fact its a tissue of lies, Diana was 20 when they married. She caused mire pain to the wives and children if the several men she bedded, including the suicide of James Gilbeys fiancée. Do some research.Diana admitted to being the first to have an affair, before William was a year old.
Sweet, kind... gimme a break! That woman was no angel! Just like Megan, but craftier.
@MsMissy So very true. I totally agree.
It would be nice to know about Camilla too
I think Charles could tell us some home truths about what Diana was really like too but he respects his son's to much unlike Diana .
Here's Lady Collins biography: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Colin_Campbell
You was the first that started the mess! Ok
Did you know these people! Interesting. This is no lady this is just a tabloid writer.
Diana was an aristocrat women who was badly let down
Of course Diana had a lover because Charles was seeing Camilla. She was scorned.
If Charles had loved her she wouldn't have strayed.
He should have been honest with her.
. She was
Diana had an affair with her security guard- who was married- (Barry Manakee) before Charles took up with Camilla.
@@lebedev63 bull!
But why did Diana pick a married man to be her lover .
I don't think she wants to go from royal family she just need space and she gives them all time to decide don't forget she has too boys and she was young and she can't played that dirty game her problems wasn't with royal family her problems more than that
Oh, boy ... the Queen's marriage was NOT a very very happy marriage ... Andrew is not a child from her husband and apparently Phillip has children strewn around the globe from his various dalliances.
Lady C trades on gossip…
Charles is a fine fellow.
Lady C , controversial ? I don't think so !
If something is a secret how did Lady C know it.
Stepmother in law...what a stretch to keep a link to a defunct marriage.
She fancies herself having been chosen as a better mate, by Charles. Didn't happen, but the fascination and fantasy was there. Charity could have used this energetic obsession. But upon tasting the bucks, she was hooked.It was a position of power.Hopped on the wave and championed the controversial ...sitting on Diamond mine.
Not dynamite.
Look at the pose,
So
Mirror 🪞 Mirror, how can the hate make me young?
Very misleading title!
Thank u, for SURE
A Lebanese Jamaican British daughter of a department store owner 👀
Did well for herself though
I was the first. Yes, original perpetrator of hate.
Salacious content. All for bucks. Would she tolerate the same?
This Rob Moore using Lady C for subscription. People won't fall for that. Most "unintelligent " thing to do. Lady c should not have granted you this interview you are airing in piece...in bits.
She doesn’t care, she has her own YT channel, and quite a successful book author.
DW was 20 when she married CW. He lied and used her for his own ends. I would have stayed married to CW simply to keep my family together. I would have told CW he could have Cami, but not both us! She could have focused on her children and charities. Leave CW to his own devices. I think DE had high hopes for her marr, but when
I don't believe Charles lied to Diana at all she lied to herself!
Diana said that when they were dating he was stand offish! He didn't lead her on.
But he did make an enormous effort to make the marriage work.
Whilst Diana seemed to think her role was to be adored!
That's a bloke...no doubt about it
Please, haven't we got past that kinda sh!t in 2021?
She is a woman.... she has never been a man.... look at pictures of her from her younger days... she was a beautiful model. Better looking than you I can guarantee but life has shown me it's generally only jealous fuglies who comment on peoples looks.
What has that got to do with it?
That's a MAN in drag