Dying Light 2 - Survivor Ending vs Peacekeeper Ending - Which Faction is Better?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
- Dying Light 2 - Survivor Ending vs Peacekeeper Ending - Which Faction is Better? • Dying Light 2 - Surviv...
00:00 Which Faction is the Best?
5:47 Peacekeeper Ending
7:39 Renegade Ending
9:35 Survivors Ending
Dying Light 2 - All Endings, Missions Choices + Scenes
• Dying Light 2 - All En...
Subscribe Here! bit.ly/VideoGameSophistrySub
For Video Game Sophistry-
Twitter: / vgsophistry
Facebook: / videogamesophistry
#VGS #DyingLight2
All content is recorded and user created, with either commentary or editing curation
About Video Game Sophistry:
Video Game Sophistry is an opportunity to celebrate the creators and the artistry found in Video Games. I believe that Games are the most effective medium from experiencing another world, and another way to live. Expect to see a series of videos showcasing the narratives hidden in every game, interviews with game developers, along with our bench mark weekly podcast, Dialogue Wheel.
VGS - Video Game Sophistry
/ videogamesophistry 
Игры
I have managed to make every single choice wrong entire game. Chopped Hakon to bits cuz I hate betrayers. I let Frank die. And I chose to save Lawan instead of the city. Normally Aiden leaves with Hakon/Lawan or by himself for greater good. In my worst possible ending, my Aiden was like "well, one place destroyed, it's time for another."
Why let frank die? You killed Hakon? Damn I saved Frank because he got the Nightrunners back together and I saved Hakon because he saves Aiden and He was forced to kill Lucas because of Waltz
i did the exact opposite, but felt like i fucked up with every single decision
@@llIIllIIIIll I didn't know that he would die and didn't think too much about Frank because Jack Matt said he will take care of him. I didn't realize he meant literally "take care of him". As for Hakon, he lied to me all the way through even when he found out that my life depended on him. Why would I trust someone who lied to me all the time.
@@abyilmaz24 If you save Hakon he actually turns out to be really good he joins the Night runners again and he saves lawan if you get the true ending. Not to mention that Frank and Lawan blamed him for abandoning them in the VNV tower even tho he told them it was dangerous
Lol I made the exact same choices shitty ending
I would say that “Saving Hakon” or “Letting him die” is the first most crucial decision of the game 🤷🏻♂️ That decision determines a lot in the ending…
You also have to keep him alive at the church.
Yea... yeaaa.... he's lucky he looks like David Belle and that I promised to leave to the coast with him at the beginning, or I'd have left him to die. What can I say I'm a man of my words. Or at least try to be.
@@neowolf09 David Belle plays Hakon. There’s him and someone else listed on IMDB for Hakon.
First important choice is the tower.
Killed him
My survivor ending had The Bartender tell Spike that “Frank and the free folk run the city now” I think the ending has a lot more slight different possibilities
You probably made all the best choices. Small details in Endings might also vary based on your decisions in doing important side quests.
Yeah for me i think it was Lawan and the free folk run the city now or something
@@centmain4538
For me lawan run away from the city with Aiden.
She is a traitor!
@@xrafter why is she a traitor?
@@centmain4538
She left the city that's why
Peacekeeper, survivors tried to hang me and were generally dicks towards me, especially that Barney guy. No regrets, no forgiveness
And they never properly apologise, just claim it was the smart decision, when none of them were doing it to be safe. They were doing it because they wanted to watch your legs kick.
Also every time the Pks had to pull out n leave survivors to protect themselves, you had to step in n protect them.
The survivors talk a good game, but everything they have, they have either because of you, or because of the old Night Runners. They didn't set up the safe bases, the night runners did, and every time they try to do something without your help (such as the water tower) they fail and need you to bail them out.
@@Trojianmaru Yes! I'm not sure if the developers were trying to reflect some political agenda or something. I just dont see the appeal of the survivors, their bases look like garbage tree houses compared to the pks castle like fortresses
Well you’re more so referring to the Bazaar and not the Survivors as a whole and besides the Peacekeepers would’ve also done that as well.
Yeah Barney doomed the survivors for me, I hated that guy and wouldn’t do shit for them.
@@deathwingthedestroyer3632 that's another point though, there's no true leader of the survivors, just lots of small disorganised groups, and even those groups can't decide who's in charge.
The bazaar and the fish eye bar are the faces of the survivor faction, but they're not really even the same group, they're like two different groups.
I personally feel like the Bazaar are the face of the survivors, the fish eye is the face of the night runners, and the small settlements are just that, small independent groups who only survive as long as someone else is protecting and helping them.
I initially disliked the survivors, but as soon as Frank gets a grip on things again them and the Nightrunners are my favorite now. Their ending feels the most right and positive to me.
Absolutely agree
The ending is a sweet dream, they want to help the weak but did nothing against the main threat wich are zombies. Peacekeepers may be rude, but at least they are effective.
@@sigmamale7804 Peacekeepers build the world that the survivors need to live in.
The ideology of the Survivors can only work if the main threat - the infected - is nullified.
@@dutchpatriot17Not to mention that The Survivors, somehow, run the city with absolutely no issues whatsoever.
but the cutscene for their ending just shows them executing a lot of people. that has nothing to do with "the main threat"@@dutchpatriot17
I was peacekeepers until I got the crossbow. Then a PK called me a "citizen" and told me to move along and that's when I realized PKs have short ass memories. I secured this windmill. Put some respeck on my name.
Can you get the crossbow and still the the survivor ending?
they called me soldier
@@Therealw1 id like to know too...but presumed as its only 7 settlements to unlock the crossbow is 4 giving the PK majority...so would think that would be how it works...im still so early in the game and not even left villedor yet!
@@Therealw1 yes you can I got the bow then went with the survivors, but you have to save hakon to get the better ending if not then you will get the worst
@@Therealw1 yes, all of the other advice and also make sure you give Frank Radio control.
In reality the PKs are the only faction that would actually have the best foundation for survival. The survivors struggled against 2 losers holding their water tower hostage. Then they committed terrorism basically against the PK's for what? Just because they couldn't stand having rations of water/food like everyone else.
Yah Jack Matt was shitty but leadership can be replaced. A system however can't be so easily.
i know it's old comment but at the end Jack Matt dies and Meyer is now ruling the pk's. And i agree with you. Pk is the best faction if we are talking about humanity survival.
I only sided with peace keepers because the survivors tried hanging Aiden versus the peace keepers only interrogating aiden but not threatening to murder him. Im a bit more shocked that the survivors faction isn't prone to supporting the renegades considering how dark age their mindset in the beginning was.
Pks for the same reason I chose stormcloaks in Skyrim, you can't try killing me and expect me to help wipe out the people who didn't try killing me.
@@TheT4Gz Send Ulfric my regards then, Rebel
@@jamesk5541 My ancestors are smiling upon me, imperial
Well the thing is if you didn't have a bio marker and you found the peacekeepers first, they definitely would have killed Aiden. I guess first impressions and small factors are super important lol
@@SA-yt3kq FUS RO DAH
I was survivor my first playthrough, then juan now pk. I think the pk ending might be the best and most logical because they actually fortify the city and have a lot more resources. They have butchers schools and barracks set up around cities and help you fight infected. I remember I attracted about four virals to a fight and the other three survivors around me took off running. That isn’t gonna work in a battle for humanity
So basically we get either a harsh military force, a failing dictatorship, or anarchy? Well I guess depends on what you think is better, absolute rule, or absolute freedom.
Sounds like reality
I fucked it up and Juan got in charge. I was running peacekeepers at first.
@@Stephd595 you look phenomenal baby girl
In the harsh military force a d failing dictator seems to be Alot safer .
At least from the dead.
why does that matter if the government executes you for something a family member did?@@nullFahrenheit
I kind of got a mix between the two the peacekeepers own all the facilities but the night runners took over the city because I gave frank the radio so I like to believe that the PKs and the survivors ended up working together to help establish farms and some PK outposts
That would be nice, cooperation is nice
Cooperations always was nice option
Pk: “6 people died hanged from stealing water yesterday”
Renegades: “40 people died last night, 20 got stamped in the food rationing”
Survivors: only reminds us that people died at night, meaning, zombies are very much still an issue with the survivors around
Peacekeepers; No freedom, totalitarian control, humans killing humans.
Renegades; No freedom, a mad dictator in charge, humans killing humans a lot.
Survivors; Freedom, people cooperating to survive, zombies killing people
So yeah, survivors might have Zombies killing people but the living conditions are a shit-ton better.
@@arielfetters5662 renegades are pure freedom its just survival of the fittest which is the most likely outcome of an actual apocalypse
@@brertt8350 If they were pure freedom they'd have no pecking order whatsoever. They have a chain of command so that's not pure freedom.
Survivors are pure freedom because there's nothing to stop you from doing what you want except the people you may be doing it to. They literally have no rules that I've seen, save for the bit at the beginning where they try to kill you because you're turning into a volatile.. but that wasn't based on a rule set in stone, it was based off them trying to survive.
If I remember correctly, food rationing would be considered a rule...
So no renegades are not pure freedom.
@@arielfetters5662 That really does not fit with the Peacekeeper MO. They let people have a fair trial while Survivors outright try to hang you. These endings are pure BS. If you remember when you snuck into a Peacekeeper area they didn't outright hang you, they literally interrogate you and let you go. Meanwhile, the Survivors would outright hang you.
@@brertt8350 no it’s not total freedom. They will still have to follow orders from the crazy leader and get killed if they don’t. That ain’t it chief.
I have choosen the pk because choosing the survivors would have led to a technological stagnation and even to an eventual extinction of humanity in villedor. My reasoning behind this is that even though the survivors have two "inventors" they are only recycling old things and eventually without securing the city from the infected they will run out of resources quicker only being able to scavange from easily accessable places, not being able to do larger scale manifacturing, stripping down of useless buildings, building of larger scale projects not being able create a reliable education system or even to preserve knowledge so it would mean a new intelectual dark age, and not even having a judicial system, they are basically nomads and nomad civilization have been shown to techologically stagnate on their own. The Only way for humanity to survive and have a bright future is to expand outward from villedor and to secure lands from the infected and I just cannot see the survivors do that.
Big agree, especially after the goat quest.
We went from a time where electric fences were a common thing... to them being so uncommon and forgotten that they were reinvented... and that reinvention was so poorly done that it became a weapon mod instead, and there's no indication they tried again to make it properly after that.
Had they actually built a working one, they could've upgraded it into a means of keeping infected (non-jumpy ones anyway) out at a larger radius.
The survivors have a school and inventors, and are not even remotely comparable to nomads... they literally can't be.
They do have a council, Aiden tells one of its enforcers that he'd make a sworn statement before them on behalf of the plaster flour man.
Theres no telling what they'll be capable of when their society stabilizes, I'm not sure why you have choosen to believe otherwise.
@@justinrivera4320 yes... "schools" but they seem to pass down knowledge by oral means not like the pk who have a literal library and have a quest for you to collect books and not just go to a damn monument, and yes they are nomads or more like indiginus people of south and north america living along nature and in this case nature includes zombies. And Of course you can't say for sure that they will be able to conquer more territories outside of villedor but they are more likely to do that than the renegades or the survivors because of the lack of water. And there was a lack of water even at the begining of the game so its not a problem that they caused.
@@sealking3838 nomads travel from Place to place and don't have a permanent home. They are not nomads, they have permanent homes in villedor.
I doubt things will end well with the pks because despite their library and books, they cant seem to figure out how to provide water to their civilians.
@@justinrivera4320 Wow, I see you everywhere I bet you're Barney aren't you...(sarcastic)
The fact that giving the Tower to Frank is a better choice Overall bothers me. Jack Planned the whole thing, sent HIS men to in there (lost them aswell), Frank even tries to stop you basically. But as soon as he realieses you make it he tries to be sympathetic.
Same, and the reasoning for why he wants it is so dumb. Matt is at war with Waltz and the Butcher, he needs more soldiers, (plus the reasons you gave), while Frank is a worthless drunk who seemingly just wants to use it as a feel good radio show.
There's also no reason why Matt couldn't of used the radio to warn everyone about the missiles either. The game just out of nowhere decides to punish you for not randomly deciding to side with the obviously washed up drunk
@@Trojianmaru yh the choices are biased towards the surviviors, not just this one
I really hate Jack to be honest Aitor was the only pk I really like(who became a nightrunner) Jack seems like a egotistical asshole that will do anything to kill the Colonel, Jack made himself president, is corrupt according Juan and is confirmed by the staged renegade attack as well as tries to get Frank killed then stops you from stopping Walts just because you didn’t kill the colonel. It’s not that the PKs are bad but it’s because President Jack Matt is a asshole
I couldn’t even pick Jack. I could only pick Frank or Juan
@@nnoir when you agree to help Juan you can only give the tower to Frank or Juan but if you don’t help Juan then you can pick Jack
They really did the PKs dirty.
Now i get that having 10 soldiers for every farmer is probably not sustainable in the long run, but having a bunch of helpless farmers (let's face it the survivors can't do shit on their own.) getting mauled by volatiles and brigands all the time is probably even less sustainable.
Also the whole introduction to the survivors you get at the start of the game pretty much cemented their fate in my eyes.
Some fun people but otherwise a whole lot of grifters gleefully poisoning each other and selling plaster mixed with flour... till they find a sucker with asthma to hang as entertainment.
Yep. As soon as you commit to the PKs youre basicslly on the "wrong" path and that shouldnt be the case or feel like that tbh
This comment is just SO, SO WRONG. Not only do survivors live in sustainable collectives, like Bazaar, absolutely doesn't mean you are helpless at all. You talk about getting mauled by the volatiles and brigands. First of all do you think that in order to survive your group must be crazily militarized otherwise it's forceless? There should be a sustainable force to defend civilians WHICH SURVIVORS DO POSESS, because they don't need a peacekeeper army. Second of all do you mentioned volatiles - do you actually think PKs fight off volatiles? Nobody fights off volatiles and that's the whole point of the night. You have UV lights just to save yourself from them. Pks got mauled in Old Villedor because of no UV lights, I guess being militarized didn't really help. Third of all 10:1 soldier to farmer type of ratio is a sure USSR scenario with inhuman casualties from starving them to death. Pks are doomed to kill the city from their dumb militarized imbalance that you support and that survivors have. Fourth of all bandits and brigands - In the survivor ending their flags are everywhere meaning survivors and nightrunners completely dominated the city, MEANING they posess a very strong force, MEANING brigands and bandints will NEVER be a problem. And finally the scammers - it is very dumb to think that they will be only present in a Survivor's version.
Fully agree with you, the survivor introduction really makes them feel like complete incompetent assholes while PK at first feels like an actual force, something that wants to achieve something. Nothing in the first half of the game indicates that the PK would be the bad ending. The Bazaar morons actually bomb the biggest windmill in the city, god only knows how many lives that would cost. But its okay, they have generators. Years of building, and massive amount of energy, gone, just because they have more brainrot than the zombies.
If survivors are supposed to be the good guys maybe they shouldn't portray them like complete scum. Even the second part of the game doesn't make that feel any better. Frank refuses to help you outright but still wants the tower even though just moments before PK save your life from boomers. The colonel does nothing to contact you expect maybe a shady deal with an exhibitionist. I guess they wanted to go with the whole "no bad option, everything sucks" but then backed out at the end.
The PKs are tyrannical, worse, they are dumb tyrannical. The worst kind. But you only see that in the credit scene. Before that there are some that are assholes, some that are kind and really want to help. Only if you go survivor do you see them be "evil" and at that point it kinda makes sense as your side kinda bombed a vital resource. So with what the game shows me. PK all the way, fuck the hippies, clear the streets!
@@jojothehamster it really is handled terribly, the "good" ending doesnt make any sense when the bazaar idiots actively work against the kind of outcome you get by siding with them. On the other hand the pks end up being facists even though at first they arent portrayed like that
@@kkownzor I've been thinking on this and my theory is that the reason that the survivors have food to spare in their ending and the reason they don't mention how many died last night is because the death toll is so massive that there's suddenly enough food to go around.
Also notice the PK ending and even renegade ending are actually in control of the streets. They are actually winning against the infected and may reclaim the whole city, meaning more land, more food, more safety. Too bad they do it in a way that from our safe ivory gamerchair perspective looks bad. I suppose from a "the world is ending and I may get eaten during the night" perspective their ending may seem like a godsend.
I hope at some point the creators explain what happened to the survivors of Harran and Kyle Crane. Maybe Aiden and Lawan will see him at somepoint if he's still alive.
nah kyle turned into the night monster in the following which is the reason all of harran turned
@@Minecraft49ers The intro of dying light 2 informs the player that the GRE are the reason the infection got out not Crane
@@Minecraft49ers I think he turned into a sentient volatile after his fight with the mother.
Wonder about Ezgi. Jasir's Daughter, we know Jasir isnt around due to age and Ezgi im unsure
@@nowayman7609 while I also believe the GRE caused the apocalypse, I also feel like the intro could just be what the public THINKS caused the apocalypse. Since nobody but us knows what really happened to Crane, the Haran crew might just think he failed to come back, not that he turned into a monster.
I haven't played this game yet (but soon), but just gonna say that the ending seems to be only aiming for the survivor faction, i was hoping that the game was supporting the idea of "all the ending is a neutral ending". Like make the players say "hmmm, i prefer the .... ending". but instead they prefer the obvious good ending and the obvious bad ending route. They should've make all the ending neutral, but...then again if there will be any DL 3 or dlc, the continuation of the story will be problematic, because the develepor has too choose wich ending is canon.
Well the game is actually ending neutral
But it isn't. Night runners will fall again, all that survivors do is complain and leech off of them. Peacekeepers actually want to defend the city and protect the people of it, even when walking by peacekeeper troops in game sometimes you can hear them make comments about saving someone's from the bazaar life and them thanking them and also them wishing for peace with the bazaar. The bazaar in the first place was only attacked because of the attack on the windmill. The peacekeepers have the right idea for the rebuilding of society. I believe the ending slide for peacekeepers does them WAYYY too dirty
@@think8736 That's because the ending cinematic for the PKs was an old obsolete one from an earlier E3 version of the game that they dusted off just to have "something" for siding with them by the end of the game. There's a reason it feels so distinctly out of place compare to the actual PKs we encountered throughout the game.
It's honestly sad how unfinished the thing is -_-
Just turn into Bethesda
@@thedog2978 Just a sign of the times. Any project by a corporate conglomerate is going to be rushed or unfinished, because after a few years they realized they didn't have to try because consumers will eat up anything they shovel down their mouths anyway
I will say this: Despite the initial "bad" appearance of the PK ending, they show people largely gathering on the streets securely/safely and mention that only 6 people died the previous night (implied to have been executed for stealing water). While the Renegades seem to have outright cleared the streets enough that it's safe for a entire crowd to gather/protest at NIGHT (which is insane in this setting), yet 40 are said to have died during a riot over rations. Then finally the Survivors, who seem to be making zero progress with fixing the city and while opening a soup kitchen for the hungry, still say "many" people died the previous night.
This implies to me that while the PK are a more authoritarian and outwardly scary/bad looking choice, they ultimately ARE the ones actually making a difference and ensuring humanities survival. While the Renegades are even moreso effective at it, but completely brutal and not worried about the good of the people. With finally the Survivors being a faction made up of those people on Facebook who'll say "Thoughts and prayers" when something goes wrong, but won't actively make an effort to help unless it either directly benefits themselves or makes them feel better about doing it (which is kind of consistent with how almost every Survivor mission/interaction is them largely either getting revenge or cheating/stealing from each other).
True, it's post apocalyptic world so we need an iron fist to guarantee civilization and prosperity live on
Buuuut, they can be lying by saying only 6 people, they proved it during the campaign
I felt bad for only choosing the PK but you made me feel better about myself 😂 fuck frank
So I've not made it to the end yet I clicked this video to try confirm my suspicions, the second Carl said "you are one we are many" I was like "I can and probably will end up killing you all you suspicious mf"
Right. Sophie tells us her mother was a great leader in one breath and that she lost dozens of people every day in the next. It seems like people are completely fooled by the atmosphere and music that plays in a single cut scene of these endings and forget about the last 60 hours of watching the survivors lie, cheat, steal, abandon and outright murder each other over scraps. A soup kitchen?! Post apocalyptic villador is no place for dead weight who eat all your rations and contribute nothing positive to the situation. This is hardly a wonderful ending. The survivors have no future, despite how pleasant the music is. They are zombie food. The survivors already had a strong mafia presence, its only a matter of time before they take over. 20 years from now the survivor ending will actually be the renegade ending. Damn this game. Every option is just distasteful. I'm not in love with the peacekeepers but they have a much better chance of actually rebuilding society.
The Bazaar was literally treating Aiden like SH!t. I chose the peacekeepers. At first they treated me much better but later in the game they called me. Traitor and tried to kill me but idk how I ended up on that path. I was basically making the most logical decisions for the people who were treating me the best.
old villedor pk's are good, but central loop pk's are fucking dictators!!!! old villedor survivors are backstabbers, central loop survivors are great people and nightrunners are there too.
You must of done a side quest or something that ended up hurting the peacekeepers inadvertently.
@@Demicleas shit, that real??? Wow techland
@@yoursoulessmate no it’s not
honestly.. i think PK is the best ending it seems like the city is rebuilding and may go back to a way of being stable like before the virus outbreak, also for the fact that the PKs are trained heavily armed and seem to be CLEARING out the zombies from the streets making the city or yet least the streets safe
Do you know of the disgusting things Jack Matt tried to pull?
@@welloetelloe jack died before the pk ending due to cancer
@@amirali31317 no I'm talking about him trying to kill Frank and the other nightrunners
@@welloetelloe yeah thats pretty f up but still i like the pk they protect the streets and gives you extra safe zones on the streets.
@@AshWilliams1234 yeah but I don't wanna get hanged cause my brother decided to steal some water
PK is the only sustainable faction in those times. It draws a harsh picture, but you need those kind of rules in end days times.
Rules?
You need numbers...against people like the PK.
They could have simply proposed that if they got the big windmill, they would liberate all the metro stations. Of cause to primarily move troops, but also people and goods.
But they did not. Just like modern day crooks that demand protection money for a problem they make up themselves.
Just like old time America before the rails, people could handle themselves, grow food and collect water. But a lot of people did not know how and thus they became outlaws, feeding on the righteous.
Not even a bit true. A dictatorship or corrupt faction destroy civilisations.
@@zackistheman1155 yea but civiliazarition is already done for….
@@Menkalinan this is why you never choose based on your biases and political views.
PK all the way.
@@Menkalinan The PKs weren't demanding money from the Bazaar. They just needed the Windmill to power their checkpoint into the Central Loop. Admittedly, they could've worked out a better deal, but the folks at the Bazaar were just being irrational when they blew up the Windmill. Which appears to happen often, given the fact that they tried to hang Aiden and wanted to hang a guy who accidentally sold someone poison water.
EDIT: Also, what were the Bazaar people using that Windmill for? I mean, they were pretty upset when it was taken from them, but they were pretty ok with blowing it up. The only thing the Bazaar gained from the Civil War if you side with them is that the PKs loose their HQ in Old Villador. And they act like it was this big victory when in reality they just got a whole bunch of people killed because they refuse to cooperate with the PKs to look for Lucas's killer.
The Peacekeepers are the answer in my opinion. The Survivors are the definition of the “Modern Dark Age”. How they dealt with Aiden in the beginning further expands on it doubled with their inability to let people explain themselves before either (A) Hanging them publicly or (B) holding them at Knifepoint. They’re own leader betrayed and wouldn’t stand on his own two feet for the better of his people. In a world where people slaughter others for basics to survive you need a presence of Law and Justice. The PK are fighting for the future of Villedor and it’s people and the only ones who can’t see that are the Survivors. The PK are bringing back one of the Old World’s most recognized and respected strengths while reinventing it to the best of their abilities. The Survivors are looking and living in a way that had been gone for centuries and for good reason. The De-evolution of humanity is what I saw in the Survivors when playing.
you are wrong because curraption propaganda and also abusing power also peace keepers houldnt rule the city on there own neathier surivors they need some form of peacekeepers police or its just a job not full on full authority in the city
@@youbgemer7196 English, please.
The pk are incompetent bandits playing army. Aitor tells you the reason the survivors dont like them... he tells you it's because the pk takes 30% of their food and water, and they see them as occupiers.
The survivors begged for help from the pk to get rid of the bandits that took control of the water tower and the pk did nothing.
They do nothing and demand food and water for protection; the survivors are totally right to want them gone.
The modern dark ages gives way to a democratic society with the survivors.
The De-evolution of humanity lies within the fascist regime that is too inept to provide its civilians with water.
@@justinrivera4320 Bruh, "dark ages" and "democratic society" are incompatible terms.
@@baconingbad Salem witch trials happened in America. America is still the best.
In my ending colonel was on the wall, but it wasnt a renegade ending. Weird... Maybe thats because I teamed up with him on the last mission
Me too. I got the best ending but it had the colonel on the wall with his eyes lined out with red paint.
Same here. Just now finished. I think it's because you believe him and that's a path.
Same here, but Frank and the free folk run the city. I got the good Lawan ending too.
I think that is a bug
Ridiculous that you can do so much for either the Pk's or survivors and that one decision immediately gives the Colonel control of the whole city. He's a good guy and all but Frank seems more better of a leadership position then Willams and Matt, espically Matt.
I really prefer peacekeepers , you can say whatever you like but survivors while being able to survive aren’t able nor seemingly eager to stand up against an infection while peacekeepers have fair chance of actually dealing with treat
*Spoilers*
Tell that to Rowe and the 404
@@blobfishking6230 who expected suicidal zombies dawg😂
@@yoursoulessmate I mean those things existed in Dying light 1 so lore wise, they literally existed for more than a decade
Survivors are better in the short term but in the long term, def peacekeepers
Yes
I think it's the other way around
@@froilanflorentino1252 yeah cause soup shops, and blankets are gonna clear the streets of all the infected right?
@@aramisvaldes1711 yeah cause a faction inside a city who can't even enter stands a chance against a whole world of infected. Survivors can secure resources enough that they can provide free soup and cheap water without killing a whole family for a sin of one. Nightrunners and Peacekeepers can and will cooperate with each other at Survivors ending (Meyer became their spokesman), Nightrunners can secure new safe zones through expeditions while PK's can secure what territories that Villedor already owns. Placing all available combatants against zombies isn't practical in a long run because the sheer numbers of infected will wear them down and leave the rest of the city vulnerable.
@@froilanflorentino1252 someone with common sense, people act like the nightrunners arent the one of if not the strongest force there is in the city. The group can scale buildings equally as well if not better than our character. Are definetely strong fighters otherwise they wouldnt have become an organized group, and are riteous enough to want to protect the weak. The only reason they even got dissolved ti begin with was because of a surprise attack from the explosive infected that no one had any idea even existed which eliminated half their force. If they had more people instead of being a small group and frank didnt go crazy drunk they probably wouldve been on par if not better than the peacekeepers and renegades at pure combat and survivability
Now, here's the thing, I consider "The Bazaar Survivors", Lead by Sophie, and "The Fisheye Survivors" lead by Frank to be two completely different survivor groups, Sophie's survivors seem to be in it entirely for themselves, and are selfish, paranoid assholes. Frank's survivor's seem to genuinely be trying to help people, hell, he's the leader of the Nightrunners after all, Central Loop seems to be in a far better state than Old Villedor, Old Villedor is in a near constant power struggle until Aiden tips the scale in one direction or the other, Central Loop is ALMOST peaceful, because EVERYONE respects the Nightrunners, and no one causes trouble in The Fisheye, until Waltz starts sending Renegades there to attack. So my personal idea is to let the Peacekeepers control Old Villedor, and let Frank's Survivors control Central Loop. Down with the Bazaar.
Explain why you think the Bazaarians are selfish, paranoid "assholes."
@@gdragon4829 they try to hang Aiden the moment they see him, they are constantly awaiting a war with the PK’s who show no aggression, they despise the PK’s simply because they don’t bend to their every need, they are the aggressors and fueled by hate in the war against the PK’s who ONLY want to know who killed their commander. Compare this to the PK’s who actively protect the survivors it’s clear which side are the assholes.
@@hellopaul1472 Aidan was turning. They had no control over helping him like Hakon did. They're no special people. They want war with the PKs because the PKs are assholes to them. Literally finding the bare minimum to kill any survivor. Sure not all PKs are bad, Aitor is a noble and respectful man. But who is the man in charge? Jack Matt. What has this got to do with anything? He manages the PKs for most of the time, he punished Margret The Healer for the incompetence of his own soldiers. And that's just one example. They despise the PKs because they ruin their way of life, their culture. Did you not see Anderson trying to blame them with the bare minimum? You can't go out and trust willy-nilly in Dying Light 2. It's the culture that's been brought upon the world. Trust is very valuable. You literally cannot blame them for not trusting you as much near the start of the game and in the hanging scene. Yea, it's a war, that means both sides are going to be aggressive to each other. The PKs want to know who killed their commander, then if the Bazaar was found guilty, they would've committed genocide. It's clear you don't understand and haven't all things into consideration.
Question which part is old villador and where is central loop?
Exactly that's the best decision
I sided with the PKs and didn't regret it they have the best weaponry and armaments
replaying the game after a year and wanted to see if the survivors had a better ending and outcomes and oh my god, the pks got done so dirty its actually insane. throughout the game survivors are nothing but useless selfish nobodies who don't want to help anyone but themselves, and although i really didn't like how militaristic the pks were they were at least helping people and trying to actually do something. why are the people dieing from thirst in the pk ending when theyre distributing water and i gave them all the towers but the survivors are doing just fine opening up literal soup kitchens when they pretty much made an an-cap society that would almost 100 percent chance extort people for profit it makes no sense. man the story was so bad it hurts.
The PK’s might as well be the brotherhood of steel lol
Glad I wasn’t the only one who felt that way lol even the PK ship HQ has have has a similar music theme to the fallout 4 BOS base.
@@1moago547 bro I swear I thought the music was literally the same, I even looked up the fallout 4 brotherhood theme to make sure
@@1moago547 fr
I did the exact same comment as well XD
I got the good ending where lawan frank and hakon live and the survivors run the city but the portrait was of the colonel and juan reiner quote
Same here. I had no idea why it was up there.
I see this on TV and I want to play it so bad thank you for making this!!
Look for someone to gamshare with
@@gamemuncher2736 slenderman hello?
@@gamemuncher2736 You can get banned for that
@@MMACinephile not on ps4/5 from what i know of. You can gameshare with only one other person by making the account primary on their console. Sad cause compare to ps3 you could have up to 5 devices gamesharing
What a lot of people don't seem to understand is that picking the survivor faction to be in charge of "utilities" doesn't magically erase the pks from existence. They're still there to provide that protection and law and order and help against the infected. It's not some sort of "anarchy" ending. It's cooperation and trying to save as many people as possible.
where are the PK's in the Ending then?
at the pk outposts like before probably@@cjeromet1971
Peacekeepers: Crossbow
Survivors: Jump pads all over the city
Those blue jump pads are Gucci. If you assign everything to the survivors you also get exploding trap electrical boxes.
@@justinrivera4320 crossbow is way better. One shot kill most times
I mean the crossbow is better than the bow but at least if you side with the survivors you still get a ranged weapon
Peace keepers are better even if they got bad optics. They cleared out the city and formed a cohesive government providing law and order to the city. They give out food and water to civilians unlike in the renegade ending where theres rioting over not getting rations.
The survivors did none of that besides have good optics other then that they are doing nothing but survive which is shameful.
With the city cleared in the PK ending it undoubtedly increased the quality of life in the city even with the heavy handed post apocalyptic law. I refuse to believe having to scrounge around for water and food every day in the hope that you dont get eaten alive is better then having the freedom to roam with food and water rations distributed to you.
I hate how they handled the Peacekeepers
Survivors act like a bunch of lunatics, while the PK's actually seem more reasonable, yet in the end the Pk's turn into fascists while the Survivors somehow bring in the utopia
I wouldn't mind an ME3 like "let's redo and expand the endings", because frankly this in insulting, I mean you spend dozens of hours helping one faction with no foreshadowing how it ends, and it's not like you can redo it unless you start a whole new game
I sincerely hope they do ME3 it. The endings are all atrociously bad and do a huge disservice to the rest of the game. The PKs in the ending are the complete opposite of everything they stood for the entire game.
Somehow the survivor ending is just as stupid because how am I to believe that the three-ish night runners left are enough to not only singlehandedly govern the city but also enforce law, order, or safety at all? And that’s not even mentioning how stupid it is that their grand accomplishment that saves the city and creates a utopia is a soup kitchen. The PKs were already handing out supplies to civilians at the missy the whole time.
I don’t even want to get started on the renegades. Each and every ending is in desperate need of a rework.
1:00 and 1:09 That Survivors ending has a lot of zombies on the ground!
Personal I would have preferred an ending that coup’d the PK’s into a force that isn’t fascism and actually assisted the Survivors. Like if you assign each territory accordingly (water towers to Survivors and power stations to PK’s) you could narratively force the 2 factions into working with each other
So many différent ending i love it you can finish with akon or Lawan or Alone too
Gotta be honest, I'm a bit disappointed with how these endings turned out to be.
What I thought was that each ending would have it's ups and downs. But really, it's just one ending is "good" and the rest is just a downward spiral.
The PKs, while a bit ruthless, did seem like the most logical decision imo. I mean, they at least have law and order, have better resources, and are better trained than the survivors.
The minute Aiden walks into the Bazaar, they immediately want to hang him. Not a single person wanted to actually help him, except for Hakkon. Then, later, they immediately want to hang a guy because he sold someone poisoned water, which it turned out he didn't even know. The man in question was also a crook who bought water with flour mixed with bits of plastic. There's also Dredger(I think that's his name) who's pretty much a crime boss, but everyone seems fine with him. The Bazaar's leadership isn't even anything to brag about. There's Carl, a former priest whose turned away from God, and devoted his life to instead preach about how "everyone's his own man" while also being a massive hypocrite. And Sophie and Barney? Give me a break. Barney is a hot headed dip shit who got his friends killed(one of which was 16 btw) and continued to have this attitude towards Aiden. Sophie is at least more reasonable than her brother, but also thought that violence was the only answer. Her actions lead to so many people dying. Not only the PKs at the Checkpoint and the Windmill, but also her own people, like Alberto. At least Carl didn't want bloodshed.
And what's so great about the Survivors ending? The only good thing about it is nothing bad happens, and that's it. It's just "Oh we got a soup kitchen now!" The only thing bad about the PK ending is that they say that not only criminals will be killed, but also their families for some reason.
I hate bringing in politics to these kinds of videos, but the developers were pretty biased towards which faction is good or not.
Have better resources? All the PKs build is breweries cadet academies and smokehouses..
The survivors build MULTIPLE farms, schools, trading posts, ect. And you honestly think the PKs have more resources at the end? When people are stealing water and THEIR ENTIRE FAMILY hung for it?
Yea, strict rules make for an Authoritarian dystopia, that's the way society works..
And a faction hoarding supplies does not mean your entire society has more resources. It means only the highest in power has the most resources..
Seriously can't beleive people are siding with the PKs when the main dude literally refused to warn his men of the coming chemical bombs so he could take the city for himself..
@@neowolf09 Just because Jack Matt was corrupt doesn't mean the rest of the Peace Keepers are. Most of them truly want what's best for Villador.
The problem is that the game is too biased against the PKs. You choose to give control of VNC radio to Matt over Frank, Aiden will still warn Frank about the missiles and tell him to warn people. Which would only make sense if Frank was given control over the radio, but if you decide to give it to the PKs, a lot of people end up dying, because Aiden is scripted to warn Frank no matter what. It's like the game punishes you for giving it to Matt.
@@elitegamer9310 youre very wrong, and after seeing PKs trying to rape someone, yea it makes sense that the game portrays them as not good. Squad 404 is cool, the deserter was cool, his friend seemed cool, but the leaders and the majority of them as a whole? No, you're wrong, most of them didn't truly want what's best for villador, they wanted what THEY think is best for EVERYONE to be forced on EVERYONE in villador.
NOT the same thing.
Yea the game punishes you for siding with Authoritarians who steal murder and rape. Big surprise there....
@@neowolf09 ...Huh?
@@elitegamer9310 You like the PKs, so I would doubt any amount of intellectual debate would be enough to change your mind. I didn't think you'd fail to understand my retort.
I can explain it to you, as I just did, but I can't help you understand it.
I like how the people of the Bazaar is terrible, but their ending ends up good
While the PK they're nice but well the ending turn out a bit extreme
The Renegades, well they suck ass
The Bazar thankfully aren't the survivors as a whole.
You can destroy the bazar and get the survivor ending anyway.
Which i will do on the second playthrough.
i got the PK ending. i feel its a good ending and even though the new leader is extreme, you have to think about how water and betrayal were main topics for conflict. now with fear instilled in the people they can portion water and keep order. but im doing a 2nd playthrough where i do the side quest to save Aitors life. im hoping this allows the PK ending to keep Aitor as leader
@@Mizzombie theres nothing good about hanging people for another persons crime.
@@justinrivera4320 the pk's jail people for thier crimes. Its only the new leader that implimented that new law which the PK's dont even agree with. Why the barkeep told spike it wont be long before she gets stabbed in the back
@@justinrivera4320 and just so you know the survivors are the ones who kill people for thier crimes. Doesnt really sound like you paid much attention
Frank played me at the radio tower mission why would I just give it to him. F that man. Nobody would make that decision in real life. Give it to the people who ACTUALLY helped you achieve this goal and gave their lives for it
The night runners had already given their lives for it, and you wouldn't have reached the top without the grappling hook they left behind. Frank was trying to protect you.
Jack matt didn't care about you, or his men for that matter.
@@justinrivera4320 bruh jack matt got all his boys killed at the tower. Instead of waiting for the power to get back on he made us get out of the elevator and go up the stairs
I wish there were two PK options, one where Jack matt goes evil, or another where your able to coup him and allow more sensible minds to prevail. They really just pulled the "they fascists now" outta nowhere.
@@americancommunist6076 Always were. Look around at the posters that state the laws they enforce; the PKs may be fine on the ground level, but their leadership by and by large want to basically act like better-dressed Renegades. If you get the Nightrunner ending, a number of them even refuse to help Jack-Matt when he orders them to fight you.
@@justinrivera4320 the grapling hook that is provided doesn't forgive what he says about aiden's sister and about he tells aiden he most likely will fail even though he has come so far
I let Frank die, but still got the good ending, where the city survived, nightrunners run the city and Lawan came with me on the road. I think Cillian was the leader of the nightrunners.
what? I don't think this ending is possible where Lawan comes with you. Lawan will only come with you if Frank is alive at the end. Are you sure you let Frank die and Lawan still followed you?
@@Paul-fo9fq Yeah I chose to chase the car and Frank died, but got the Lawan cutscene at the end.
@@GhullieUser wtf, interesting. I chased the car as well and Frank died. Lawan survived to the end but did not follow me. So I'm confused, from what I saw on youtube, I thought the only way for Lawan to come with you is if Frank is alive
@@Paul-fo9fq Maybe your interactions with her play a role too
@@GhullieUser I think I picked all the interactions that should favor the outcome you got. Idk, really confused
The picture on the wall with the caption can be different. The person Spike is delivering to can be different. In the Survivor ending I had the Juan quote and he was delivering the package to Frank. I am unsure what causes those changes so far but I hope it isn't just a glitch. Like how when I started a new game I had a bunch of survivor and peacekeeper benefits randomly around old Villedor. Like airbags and yellow zip lines, as well as electrical traps but they were sparse and other things were missing.
New here waited for a sale on the game I'm loving it thank you for your information it helped so much
Personally like the survivors. The vibe is great late game and whilst it gives them a horrible first meet with them, the whole story with F & R and the night runners is sweet with the survivors. My first time finishing it I got the secret ending with Lawan and everything going well in the end.
Actually, you can get the Survivor ending if Frank is dead. Just saying.
wait how?
The ending I got was the town banner being blue, cause I supported the PK except in the tower where frank gets it and the end where I leave the colonel alone. I get a mix of both when the missiles are destroyed, the survivors are warned, and the bazaar is destroyed.
Awesome! 😎 Thanks for this! 👍
Wow my ending did have Frank leading the city and the bartender said Lawan was the leader of the nightrunners. that's crazy how did you get the "good ending" with jack matt dying and Meyer still running the city?
Hahaha..... my ending was the worst possible ending, so bad it wasn’t on this list.
You destroyed the City ?
Lol same
great vid
the ending is totally biased! if you give a part of the city to the PK and later come back to it you will see PK soldiers rescue wounded survivors on the the streets and they the only factions that have law and TRIAL! remember that Aitor not kill Barney immediately but send him to trial instead? remember that the bazar peoples want to hang a guys that they "suspect" that he sell poisoned water? turnout he not the real criminal? yea... the survivors is the type of peoples that more like to hangs entire family for water not the PK! and this is just like the dev want us to sign with "the free" anarchy people that have no rational thinking at all and the PK just like ahaha i'm evil now! i'll still get the PK ending! i don't buy in the dev biased
I agree with you, the PKs resemble the last remaining authority. Their base contains prisons which they have criminals still alive and not hanged like the survivors would. But I also care about the survivors. I just wish they had a compromise.
Totally agree I just feel like they force you to go with the survivors even though they treat you like shit to get the good the best ending which is a joke and then turning PK evil was really stupid made nosense at all. And the writing in this game is just all over the place
I agree the PK are way better than the survivor who are just anarchist who wants to do what they want for themself and not for the greater good + pk patrool try to contain the infected on the street and helps injured civilians/fight renagades while the cowards survivors stay on the roofs and let you die
The problem is the ending for some reason the peacekeepers make a 180 turn and now kill anyone who steals water with their entire family. When the peacekeepers literally disobey jacks order to kill you of frank arrives
bad writing is all.
Honestly, the best outcome would have been a mixture of the PK and survivors. The PK are way too much law and order with unreasonable control and justice. At the same time, the best outcome long term is an army with a clear path and will to protect the city. The survivors are much better short term, and long term, their community first approach could work but only with a strong and decisive military behind them. I kind of wish an ending with a middle ground…
I fully agree. They PK work great as a military but not so much as a government (obviously, since they’re structured after the military). While Frank and the night runners would be good at governing, but there’s not enough of them to enforce any sort of law, order, or safety.
Yeah I never see the PKs with food sources being seriously taken into account. While the Survivors never talk about "hey maybe we can clear the city little by little".
Hey, when we get back into NG+ we'll gladly take the job of killing zombies ;)
PK all the way and also they are nice to you. Survivors were annoying and mentally unstable.
In my ending, Survivors took over, picture of Juan was on the wall but Spike brought a package for Frank and Aiden left the city with Lawan
Got almost the same ending. Seems strange that it shows the survivor ending with the sun banners, but it showed the Colonel on the wall and Spike mentioned Juan. Then he had a package for Frank.
I got the good ending with Lawan but I still had the colonel on the wall with his eyes crossed out with red. I think it's a glitch with the juan transmitter mission, even though I gave it to Frank.
Yeah I got the ending that showed the banner with the sun, but then it shows the Colonel on the wall and Spike mentions Juan Rainer.
same here
@@dogestranding5047 Ditto, I even avoided all Juan choices and still got it.
Question:
After you beat the game and say the PKs rule the city, do you get to play the city under Marshall law? Or does it go back to how it was before the game finishes? I imagine it does look as it does before the ending but I figured I’d ask
All visual changes from the ending are reverted to a state from before the final mission, so you won't get to play around in each factions ending as Aiden cannotically left the city before seeing said changes
@@LeFisheboi wait.. so there isn't some type of free-roam epilogue?
That's odd, I managed to get the survivor ending even though Frank, Lawan, Jack Matt, and Hakon are all dead.. I must've got a hybrid renegade ending cause Juan Reiner still holds power but the Night runners are the ones leading the city 🤨
I understand what people say about pks having rules and balance or whatever but they act like the survivor route doesnt have the nightrunners which is basically the pks but on a smaller scale unless they grew in the credit scene and they actually care for the survivors from what i gathered
I just wanna know at the end. Can you just give all the territory's to one faction or no because I've done half and half trying to get the crossbow but I didn't, idk why but yeah can you?
i got the best ending. frank dead, lawan, hakon dead, jack dead, waltz dead, colonel dead, bazzar dead, jaun dead, Mia, dead, just the way i wanted it. only character worth keeping alive was Aitor.
I second that.
i ended up getting the ending with Aiden and Lawan leaving together but my ending with spike coming into the bar was different then anyone else videos i seen so far. mine had license plates on the wall with what looked like codes. you know where the camera pans right to show the wall right before he gets to the bar. on every video i have seen so far had a picture there. mine had license plates. is there anyway to go back to see your own ending again besides having to play it all over again? i tried to take a pic of it but was to late.
I think you can play the last mission over and make the same decisions
Should’ve used the recording feature 🗿
@@jimweidema3668 Is that only for a specific console? I'm on Xbox and there's no option for that and the choice to do so for me doesn't exist
@@blobfishking6230 no I saved it before accidentally so I just reloaded my save
I really like the story they made so far and the endings what they did for all factions but the actual city did not change from what they looked like when you say with a faction they should update that
How did you get the survivors ending with Franks photo up and him leading the city instead of Juan leading the survivors and the colonels photo being hung up?
I started helping peacekeepers for Aitor, I stayed for Rowe and his crew.
R.I.P.
For whatever reason, I got the Renegade photo even though I got the Survivor ending
Same.I think it’s probably another bug
same, spike even said the whole line about Juan Rainer and everything. I was confused
It isn't a bug you can get Juan and Williams in somewha of power position if you chose to go with survivors and trust colonel the pk stop existing but they don't have as much power as they do in the renegade ending,also In the survivor/colonel ending lawan leaves with aiden saying that she doesn't want to stay in the city with Williams
Finally, a video that’s honest and accurate. Other RUclipsrs I swear are paid by DL2 game developers to hype up their shit
I personally love the survivors ending and the true ending where loan survives and goes with aiden
Shame but not unexpected. It would be nice if the endings were more ambiguous and didn't have such objectively good/bad outcomes. But this is why I roll my eyes whenever a game boasts about player choice.
"Player choice effects things"
Meanwhile the guys who try to kill you, kill an innocent, lie, cheat and steal are considered the good guys because FREEEEDOOOOM!!!!!!!
@@TheT4Gz That bothered me as well, the rebels came across just as violent and dickish as the PK...but it's okay when they are?
@@capthavic yeah they blow up a windmill because it was taken from them so they basically bombed a vital structure because " If I can't have it no-one can" like these are meant to be the good guys? Why? Because they mention freedom? In any other game a group of people who lie cheat steal kill and blow up buildings would DEFINATLEY be considered the bad guys
@@capthavic also they let dicks if you played the side missions basically own parts of the bazzar like a mafia and Barney’s dumb brother gets more survivors killed but Dosent get punished because he’s Sophia’s brother there corrupted aswell atleast with pks u can kill jake Matt but sadly can give somone like aitor or somone else control
@@capthavic makes sense they could be biased idk but still like come tf on if you want to engage into making their own decisions. Then they should've had uniquely good solutions or consequences.
Edit: sorry late comment
But if you don't go with the pks you don't get the sunken city .....
Just finished NG+ and got the Survivors ending along with a Renegade Helmet that gives me 15 points of defence
I got the survivors ending but the picture Spike reads it the picture of Juan and he says he has a package for Frank.
In my game, I gave the radio to frank, pk and survivors had 3 zones controlled each, and I sided with jack after frank died against the colonel cuz I wanted to see the continuation of that 2019? E3 mission showcase, and I got the survivors ending so I’m not sure if frank has to be alive for that ending
Apparently he has to be alive to secure that ending and you have to give the radio tower to Frank in order to get the ending.
Only thing that makes me concerned
How do they put new caps on the beer bottles?
maybe they have primitive device that helps them do this?
i got a hybrid ending lol cause i sided with juan when i had to take care of those uv lamps but otherwise i always sided with survivors and gave the vnc tower to frank so i have the true ending but juan is on the picture when spike enters the fish eye for some reason
2:08 actually you don’t need frank alive to get the ending, I didn’t save him but still got the survivor ending.
it's a shame there no secret ending to make the status QUO remain Helping the 2 faction bringing the cease fire by helping both making sure to contact Jack matt when the missile will falls so he can send warning message instead of frank ( if you gave it to jack) Just make THE TRUE ENDING
Jack doesn't warn anyone about the missiles. Aiden tries to tell him to warn people but Jack doesn't regardless
@@Dstryrr just like during the first chimic strike years ago before the game start , jack matt is a dick meyer/aitor are way better than this dude
I wish there was more given to you for siding with each faction. I joined the PK's hoping i would get some of their armour, like some big bulky shit that is gonna make me feel like an actual tank. and if i joined the survivors maybe you could get some old night runner gear that massively improves parkour. I feel like the majority of the game until the last 3/4 missions your essentially a slave to either faction, and see nothing in return from it.
There's a free dlc pack with full pk outfit and weapon you can download it it's around 8mb and available on every platform
I have finished yet, but from what I've played the PKs and feck off, I'm planning on sinking with lawn,Frank and survivors. I'm also not going to release the lake
My survivor ending has Frank die because I decided to chase the van instead of stay with him. So I had lawan leading the night runners even though she left with me in the end. Hakon still alive and I think Juan ran the city.
Edit: the text told me the free folk run the city but Juan is in the picture at the bar. Package came for frank (who was killed). These endings are wildly different depending on your choices.
I totally got diff ending from all this 3. Saved Lawan, blew up the city lol
same
same and save the colonel
Survivor Ending hands down is the best ending the peace keeper one is honestly horrible if you think about it due to there running out of water which would spell the death of any group of people
The endings cutscenes are biased. The survivors may very well have problems with water too
@@caior5377 they “may” but def don’t. If you watched all the endings you can tell that they very well getting by thru rationing and donating any unsold goods.
Wrong, peace keepers will clear out the infected so the water treatment plan could be recovered. The survivors just hide in the rooftops and don’t do anything to clear out the infected. The renegade ending also has them clearing out the infected but they allow huge price increase for water.
@@Alex-pj8nz makes sense even tho the night runners came back in survivor ending and said bazaar was thriving because of sophias leadership and how downtown was rationing and donating😂nightrunners easily stronger than pks and renegades so wym the survivors jus hid on rooftops n did nothing🤣mans jus spittin ideas out
@@philupmycup6649 Sorry but the survivors ending has the infected owning the streets while they just hid on top, not like the PK and renegade ending. You feeling good doesn’t change this fact.
Mannn i still can't believe I helped out the survivors in villedor then switched to the pk's side in central that whole process had my story fucked up and I was so confused
Only reason I’d go with the PK’s at all is just to access the sunken area
You can get the sunken area with survivors but you would have had to chase the truck.
Curious: Does the game have a New Game+? Dying Light 1 had that, and I wonder if this game does so you don’t lose your loot you collect throughout your first play through.
Nope, not yet. Devs have said there’s a plan to implement New Game+ as well as a very hard “nightrunner” difficulty in the future though.
Well, then. Better not start a new game and lose all of my top tier loot I’ve gathered!
@@anthonyworstell3768 you can have multiple saves, at least on PC. I'm currently on my second playthrough but still have my first file.
@@shlagin9354 you can have multiple saves on console too
@@Trojianmaru how tf
I accidentally got the best ending. Didnt watch any tutorials but I got the Bazaar messed up. It really comes down to supporting Frank. I agree with you mate!
same here some pks are ok but the rest are bad i helped the Bazaar it was hard to guess who killed the commander but my gut told me the whole thing was a set up of some kind and i ended up right
Is there an ending that allows you to have no fog when ur free roaming
WOAH my survivors ending was different from this one, instead of spike having a package for Jack Matt, he actually had a package for Frank, which Nicholas would give to Lawan because she was the new leader of the nightrunners
Yeah I got that ending too and the bartender said he left the city and Lawan came with him but without anybody else knowing, let me just clarify the bartender didn't say that lawan left the city.
If renegades were still a joinable faction ... i would honeslty first try get that ending ... BANDIT LIFE!
spoil
spoil
so in fact jack matt was the real bad guy and the "butcher" is not such a bad guy but just a "tough soldier" with waltz turning a part of the renegades against the colonel authority , I would have also loved if we could have joined this faction earlier in the game and not just an ending
@@Quanbe77 honestly entering the renagade base n seeing women n children, felt weird and dumb.
None of the renagades we fought acted like family men, so it was like the game built up us attacking the renagades, but really we just attacked a completely unrelated group who call themselves renagades.
Meanwhile the renagades we've been fighting, who work for Waltz, just don't seem to have a base of operations. At least not one we ever see.
@@Trojianmaru in fact those renagades under waltz are former renagades/military soldiers under the commandment of the colonel but get brainwashed because of the excessive use on inhibitors just like how sometimes aiden become violent for no reason /seizures, they probably got mental breakdown and become full savages with so much drugs
@@Trojianmaru there is a different between the colonels renegades and waltzs renegades, waltz renegades are out of control and only listen to him like he was some kind of god(probably cause of the drugs he gives them),while the colonels renegades are more like regular people with comm sense too bad you can't really assist colonels renegades only in one mission you get to do that but it's really just aiden alone
@@smoke_xl3332yeah I honestly hope butcher would become the leader
The pk is best but the devs make it worst
Can I hand over districts to the peacekeepers, but do the survivors story choices and still get a survivor ending? I ask, because that crossbow is wicked good
How do you get the "Long live the free city of villidor" frank poster ending ?
I never trusted the PKs, maybe some as individuals, but never the group as a whole. Their list of laws and rules with executable offenses is long and easy to infract. To rebuild a society it makes sense to sustain and build your community, not subjugate it into forced conformity.
Never trust any collective period, Aitor was a good man IMO as well as most of the Peace keepers that are on the ground fighting, but the PK were mostly just a means to an end for me, I wanted the survivors destroyed as a faction primarily due to how insufferable all of the characters aligned with them were (aside from Frank) the funny thing is even during a survivor aligned playthrough you wind up fighting and killing them more than anyone else.
Endgame cutscene survivors are make-believe hippy bullshit in comparison to what they are and how they act in game.
And they kill entire families for the wrongdoings of one person. Humanity won’t thrive like that.
Can you assign all the territorys to the pks but still side with the survivors to get there ending?
You can't there only 10 of them so just get 4 for crossbow from pk and 6 to the survivor that it
7. 3 are locked.
The only thing that weirds me out about the endings is that for some reason , it became and RTS where all the structures have the PK/Surv/Rens color scheme and aesthetic.
This makes me want an RTS set in the Dying Light universe with four playable factions, so you can play as the Survivors, Peacekeepers, Renegades or the Infected.
Think my epilogue was bugged. Made sure everybody survived and sided with the Survivors but the epilogue bar scene had the colonels picture on the wall instead of Frank's. Spikes package was for Frank but he was told that Lawan runs the Nightrunners now except immediately after that I got the scene where Lawan leaves the city with Aiden.
I believe that The Free Folk/Survivors are the best ending, but the PKs are a better faction due to their law and order which is necessary for a safe and prosperous society. Especially with infected and Bandits killing everyone. Then when safety is secure, freedom and community can truly prosper.
I believe a fair balance of PK and Survivors (with Survivors being the slight majority of 4/7 districts) is the best solution.
There's an ending for that-ish
@@VideoGameSophistry it's basically a statement letting the player know that the bazzar still lives remotely away from the peacekeepers. (Spoilers for this bit) unless if all control is for the PK, them you get a lovely message saying they didn't recover from the civil war.
dont actually know if the districts distribution does anything to the ending. Gonna have to play again and get a different ending (went peacekeepers most the time and then Juan path but fucked everything with the safe Lawan choice lol) but you can actually go neutral with the Districts. Ive got 4 on PKs and 4 for Survivors. You have to conquer one of the Renegade districts for that.
It's sad that you actually think safety is the priority over liberty.
This is why our current societies are spiraling downhill..
People care more about having an illusion of safety than they do about having any personal freedom or liberty.
I don't feel safe around the PKs, I feel like they will try to hang me the moment they get what they want out of me for being a theif because everything you pick up off the ground, or dead bodies, or chests, all of it doesn't belong to you.
Law and order is not necessary for prosperity and if anything tends to hinder it. It IS however necessary for the sheep being culled to THINK they're safe, when in reality they're now in more danger than they ever were.
@@neowolf09 I don't think that had nothing to do with irl societies mate. People chose PK cause in game setting in Post apocalypse world not Our peaceful world, I mean really? You think people gonna chosen that in real life?
You don't felt safe around PK? and How did you feel safe around those Survivor then? They literally gonna hang a man who didn't even poison the drink he sold without trial, A man who didn't like his son in laws give a quest to get him a jewelry knew that there full of zombies and sent 2 thugs to kill him, Two kids try to kill their friend's dog for meat, Two man got chase by zombies so let's turn of UV light then and let's them die.
Law and order is not necessary for prosperity and if anything tends to hinder it? Serious? Look at Sumerian and Code of Ur-Nammu the first law code that pretty much PK doing. And how that hinder prosperity? You can look at Egypt , India or Greek it all start from Law and Order.
Its so very biast.
during the gameplay the PK's are the easy choice
While during the ending screen the PK's are the worst.
I dont get it.
Agree also I think the reason why they did that was I heard the ending was rushed for some reason
Its made by French people what do you expect?
at the ending for my survivors run it was a picture of jack matt but his eyes had red paint over them is that like another ending? i gave everything to the survivors gave frank the tower saved the city bazzar and left with lowan
I got the survivor ending but frank died I think that it only matters if you give the radio to frank