Goal-line technology put to the test
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 май 2024
- Goal-line technology was used in all of the matches of the FIFA Club World Cup Japan 2012. This is how the systems were set up and how they fared.
www.FIFA.com/Football-Technology
#Footballtechnology
How the GLT systems were tested:
• Testing the goal-line ...
More about how Hawk-Eye works:
• Goal-line technology: ...
More about how GoalRef works:
• Goal-line technology: ...
More about the use of GLT at the 2013 FIFA Confederations Cup and 2014 FIFA World Cup™:
www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/organisation/marketing/qualityprogramme/news/newsid=2014983/index.html
Subscribe to FIFA on RUclips to stay updated on daily releases:
ruclips.net/user/subscription_c...
More videos from FIFA on RUclips:
/ fifa 
Спорт
RUclips be like
2014:no
2015:no
2016:no
2017:not yet
2018:next year
2019:Let’d put it in everyone’s recomandation
so true
These comments are really boring now
You joined in 2016
Recommended after 6 years. Why so early youtube?
Exactly I'm used to getting video recommendations from 2007, I'm very disappointed😡
@@zeyadashraf6396 Me too
Who is here after VAR
Me🔥🔥
Me
Oh no no
andy tiniacos oh no no
People with fortnite prof pics are the.b8ggest virgims ever
Great, now we need offside technology, and we're set. Assistant refs can just be there to help call the fouls and corners.
... and even THAT is replaceable xD
Really
Meris Ahmic m
javixm there is
javixm yes
Yeah, there should be offside technology, I never thought of that. One goal that happened in the FIFA WC 14- the player was offside and the ref didn't see that. And that caused them to win the match, which wasn't fair. FIFA needs offside technology, refs make bad calls or they don't make any calls at all.
bjehulk So what? The correct decision is what matters!
Mexico vs Argentina WC 2010 Messi was CLEARLY offsides. Then the ref was in shock because he actually he admitted he messed up. Idk why they couldn't have taken off the goal
+ricomajestic Excactly....it won't even take that long. It'll take less than 25 seconds. What are you talking about...it'll take too long? As long as they get it right-that's what matters!
bjehulk...they can just do what is done in the NFL where a coach gets a limited number calls to be reviewed during a game. In soccer there could be a maximum of 2 review calls per team during an entire game. This would prevent repetitive stopping of the game. There is already technology that would review offside plays in real time and would not require the game to be stopped! Imagine how this could clean up the game. If a player is legitimately fouled or if he dives in the penalty area, the play could be reviewed by the 4th official and the correct call could be made. This might eliminate diving by players for fear of getting caught and receiving a red card!
+ricomajestic yeah.... THE CORRECT decision is what matters. If offside technology will avoid bad calls then why not have it?
They added it to FIFA 15 and 16 but it's broken😂😂
Yea
How to activate it? It never workrs with me.
It activates by itself.
+Bruh. hit cross bar like next to line (post)
Why is it broken? I never noticed any issues
U thought the lampard incident was bad... Come to fifa 16 😂
lol
lol what
T21boygamer no, the AI just picks the wrong picture frame
EDG FIFA jsjdjyefhhdejfhyrhf 😎🤗😚🤗😊🙂🤗😋🤗😚
3yers later bro come to fifa 19 no more words
2013 and they still have windows xp.
best and easiest os known to man
bjy true that
Are you happy to have Goal-line technology in events and leagues?
Yes I am.
Yes I am
Made the matches fair for both
YESS...
but in the Indonesian league there is no Video Assistant referee and Goal line technology
Who is here after Sheffield's disallowed goal?
Who’s here after Sheffield vs Aston Villa
😂
Great to see technology improving FIFA football 👏👏👏
Your 10 years late bro, and so am i
@@hibye4469 so true man 😉
Offside technology would be better than this.
Offside is a waste of time cause without the offside that is what u call football
That would be stupid cause of your toe is off then it is offside
+Carlos Franco the offside rule is a rule of interpretation.. it's not only about being in an offside position. the refs have to decide if he is active in the play...
That would be like the hardest thing ever . They would need to put tech all around the pitch
Absolutely-if you think about it-it's actually really easy to make offside technology. Just think about VR, computer games etc
Why so much technology for that? two to three cameras mounted in the crossbar is enough
The ref isn't allowed to see the replay of the goal, the technology allows them to know when the ball is behind the line
Firegamers789 why isn't he allowed to rewatch it?
Jerombolo The argument amongst the critics is if we introduce video replays like other sports it would slow down the game too much, so rather than stopping the game so the ref can watch a replay they use the current system so that the cameras and the tech do all the work and it just alerts the referee if it's a goal.
FIFA stated the system must be able to do this in under 1 second to be considered. The 2 systems that passed are the ones that are now used.
Jerombolo Because Football is not an American sport.
Nicke. Well tennis is neither but they have this system there. Forgot it's name. You probably know which one, to see if the ball touches the line or not
Marcos Dani los voy a extrañar fueron buenos momentos nunca los olvidare
hundreds of people keep saying in the comment that it can be solved by just using simple camera. If all of you have thought about it, what makes you think they skipped that idea? It's because they want more than that. Not because they didn't thought of it.
*think
Caleb Silverman you're right. Thanks.
***** You have problem with us potatoes now? huh? You choked on one of us when you're a child or something?
*****
Potatoes can read minds~~~
Not really. I'm the one you chocked on and you shat me and I live again. I like the feeling of being inside you.
I thought the thumbnail was some sort of new xbox or something haha
A 7 yr old comment with no replies
Haha
Interesting. Good job for the people who made it, it must've been so hard
Wow, You are really good. We Enjoyed this, Well done.
Informative video. Very cool.
From a goalies perspective this technology could be his worst nightmare
Liverpool vs Sevilla: 3 handballs in the Box from Sevilla and the referees didn't. See any of them
+Dan Kennedy Have you read the rulebook?
true
wt7h
Thats why they have VAR now
Karuna Shrestha and var still sucks hard
Thanks a lot for the info!
Excellent video. 👍
Glad to see FIFA using modern technology: is the future of the game and the world at large.
The NHL needs to use this technology for determining if the puck crossed the line or not. Far too often it's deemed inconclusive because the puck can't be seen through the goalies glove or underneath him.
+PugsNotDrugs4 That won't work, because this system only uses cameras. And if the puck is under the goalie and the goalie is in the goal with a part of his big protective material, even the cameras can't recognize it.
can use the electromagnetic method.
Taufik Akbar
doesn't work, a puck is made out of hard rubber
@@Etherion195 Maybe they could repurpose the puck design from the old FoxTrax system.
@@SWalkerTTU i don't know exactly how that one works, but it seems like it works with lights, which in turn would cause the same problems as the other mentioned methods.
This is really great!
Foi muito boa a implantação do goal line foi muito bo.
Frank Lampard goal was over the line
***** It would not have mattered anyway 4-1 I mean hello?????
Phillip Jang The score was 2-1 at the time. Going into the second half at 2-2 rather than 2-1 would have completely changed the momentum of the game. Two goals in Two Minutes would have been a real confidence booster and Germany would have been on the back foot.
Expert Plasma You know, when you play sports sometimes stupid decisions are made and you have to deal with it. And the fact that the score was 4-1 instead of staying at maybe 2-1 or 3-1 showed that England's collapse was inevitable. Anyway, have fun at the next world cup
But you can't blame losing a game because of it things happen and you have to deal with it.
Phillip Jang Actually, it would. The match wouldve been 2-2 with momentum on the English side.
btw im not english
As bayrakları as...
Be o piçin amk onun için bayrak açanında
Hemen hızlı hızlı gelip boş şeylere bayrakları asıyorsunuz
They should do a TMO system like they do in rugby
what is that?
+JamalPLAYS MC where there is a ref who watches the replays and makes a decision
Jazzicals Mr skeleton hands man yes in soccer it’s called var but it’s not used in la liga and other leagues for some reason
thats the thing, the clock needs to be continually rolling, that's a huge part of why this sport is so amazing. I think if they stopped the game after every foul or offside or goal then the game would take twice as long and the game would be completely different.
Im from the future, we have offside tech as well
Someone is going to see this in 50 years and think, that was considered a compact system?
Also because in football the time taken to make that decision would add to the extra time since the clock isn't stopped during intervals such as goals,outsides, corners etc
Awesome!
Whilst i agree that works for many sports, that idea is used very effectively; unfortunately replays take time to analyse and make a decision upon. For stop-start sports like basketball, american football and rugby, that's fine! However for continuous sports with only very short breaks (by comparison), it is important that momentum etc is maintained by a very quick system, such as the ones shown.
What happens when the ball hits one of those sensors in the goal, it falls off and the goalie is knocked out... that would be funny.
Its impossible...
+Agustinøx Jrø it is possible
FOOOT Manuel How exactly?
Agustinøx Jrø the ball could have been hit so hard the camera falls off and then the GK is under the camera trying to get the ball and then BOOM gets knocked out 😎
FOOOT Manuel And personally , i don't think that a player would kick directly to the cameras/sensor just to throw it. It would be childish and stupid.
nice one👍👍
04:57 The non-visible spectra of electromagnetic fields used in this detection system are not affected by "day light or night conditions".
However, their testing equipment, which does operate in the visible range, is.
I wonder if similar systems are installed on highways to predict car crashes?
5:50 wow! he should be a striker! RL9 is no one comapared to him xD
agreed
Wading song video
Poor joke
Harz.exe de
First string team
What about offsides technology Hugh to many goals called off especially for Mexico in this World Cup
Yeah also the goal Messi scored at World Cup for argentina
another great step towards matching fixing prevention!
A great invention
6 YEARS AGO
ALREADY
and on my recommended 4 some reason
RUclips is broken
They also need offside technology too. To bring the game into 21st century.
we need offside things for football (SOCCER)
Cheers Geoff
guys its a watch that will inform the refs its a goal... he doesnt have to wait for someone to tell him it went in or watch a replay.
I had this recommendation after the Japan winner against Spain
That ball was still in Play due to the ball being a sphere the outer edge was still in play so it still counts as a goal
Right 👍
It doesn’t actually work like that goal line tech is only used inside the goal and in the Fifa WC scenario the ball sends signals that tell the VAR room when to check to see if it’s in play or not.
incredible wow
its really good technoligy
And now, Sheffield United have been failed by Hawkeye’s technology
114 people are Juventus and Germany fans!
242 now
+Kelvi Bulku (Pr3d4t0rElite18) Don't forget Chelsea ;)
254
+Kelvi Bulku (Pr3d4t0rElite18) You mean England (1966).....
Joao Antonio Nope.
Great !
Welcome to the Future ☺️ 2022
However, today we lost one of the greatest of Football Pele 😌
Yet in the FIFA games, "Goal-line technology" sucks baaaaaaaaaad.
haha so true
I some times wonder that too, the ball goes out of the line, and instead of a throw-in, the game just continues on.
"it's well over the line" 5 yards away From the line XD
SpacePod9 no on FIFA games it is 100% correct but the replay stops at the wrong moment which makes it look like it wasn't a goal
Why referees when you have cameras ^_^
Keezy .S for fights fauls and giving out cards
That's great!
Cássio do timão no vídeo hehe, representou 👏👏👏 vai Corinthians!!!
That server rack looks absolutely pitiful.
as lONG AS we don't turn into hockey with the red lights and goal horns well actually Goal Horns are sick but I like the GOOAAAALLLL better
amazing technology.
I totally agree 100% I really don't understand why they are complicating matters with all this technology. all you basically need is a guy to check the replays
minuto 6:48 sale guerrero de PERU :D
What if the ball hit the sensors in the post won't they be damaged? or what material were used?
thats why they installed cameras for world cup
Today in the Premier League, Chelsea vs. Hull posed a challenge to Hawk-Eye. Sure TV replays also could've conclusively shown that the ball hadn't gone in, but the system was able to accurately and *instantly* determine that a goal had not occurred.
The key thing is it did its job and still allowed the match to flow, like a football match should. The suggestion of just viewing a TV replay, although it works in other sports, would be inappropriate here.
Yes, it`s so cool.
Funny how Football is the most popular sports around the world, and yet sports like Tennis, Ice Hockey, American Football etc. have those technologies and much much more, for years and years. In Ice Hockey, if the referee on the ice makes a mistake, the 2nd team of referees will watch the slow motion reply and correct him if necessary.
How come FIFA is so slow in adapting to new technologies?
With all the technology we have, we could assist the referee with everything. No more wrong cards, unseen hand ball, unseen fouls, fake fouls etc. It would actually be fair play for once. But nope, let's include human errors, cause it's more fun.
Well yes, it is more fun
it's a process
yeh in sports u need creativity not a bunch of machines
Hobbit Stomper Football is the best and most loved sports in the world. The amalgamation of talent and technology would reduce unfairness in games. FIFA knows more than you so they know how and when to bring new technology in action.
Aidid Rashed First off, there is not such thing as "best" in life. Anyone who uses the word "best" to compare anything in life, is clearly immature.
Second, the reason FIFA doens't update their technology, is because FIFA is run by a bunch of 70-80 year old conservative men who are afraid of change. They grew up without technology, and they think that technology will ruin the sport. This way of conservative thinking is wrong. Our world is constantly changing, so we need to adapt to it as well. All the other sports that introduced technology just got more popular and a lot fairer.
France - Honduras !
Thank You, Frank
YES! YES! Thankyou!
why not just use the replay? You have cameras there already
+ae TÂY ĐÔNG CLAN you put the camera just behind the post facing the line, that's it.
+ae TÂY ĐÔNG CLAN well then you know it's a goal for sure if it hits the camera in the net
why not? it works well in rugby
But the ref can't see it
At the current time
JUST REVIEW IT ON A CAMERA! THE SAME COULD BE DONE FOR DIVING!!
***** Well it also improves the game. And stops cheating from happening.
***** It takes less time than you think also.
Yeah just like in hockey
they should definitely look at replays for diving, but only in the box/penalty situations. otherwise i'll be wasting my whole day watching spain
***** Slow motion exists.
A day when football was changed
Offside technology is also quite important as that of the goal line technology... Waiting for the FIFA to take that immediate action
Maan, what an effort. Why not just put 2 slow-mo cams behind each goal and two team members - one from each team - in the catacombs looking at the monitor :D People tend to over engineer
+PennyHerbst You would have to pause play while they look at the slow mo, what if another incident happens between the goal and the slo mo recognising the goal
Pav4n
Because it's fucking expensive, goals can't really be moved again, it will be even more expensive, if something breaks, and it's not necessarily a useful effort. Plus, what happens, if referees start to count on this and then it doesn't work maybe one time? Nothing is flawless, but i'd rather have a very small human flaw than a very expensive technical flaw, which makes it lose all it's purpose.
It's not expensive relative for the money that is in football, at around £250K per install and it will last years and years, Premier League officials earn between £70,000/yr and £85,000/yr a year, the system pays for itself in the long run. Goals don't really get moved often, on the rare occasions where the groundsmen change the pitch they are more likely to repaint along the sides of the pitch. You seem to expect the system to have errors, Hawk-eye has been used in tennis for 10 years, and in other sports like cricket for nearly as long, this isnt exactly new technology. Even if Hawk-Eye was to slip up once, it would still be more accurate than a referee, look at all the close calls it has made already in the Premier League without incident. The reason this technology is needed isn't because the job cannot be done by a human, but because the decision needs to be instant, something a human cannot do. The reason it needs to be instant is so the ref can stop the game and declare the goal has been scored. You can't pause the game, or go back at a later time and declare that was a goal and play must be stopped, that's not football.
Pav4n
uhm, your calculation is actuallypretty much non-existent. You don't pay more officials only because they need to watch the goals.
The pitch is changed almost every year in some stadiums and therefore the goals have to be moved and everything maybe has to be installed again.
But you areabsolutely right that the decision has to be instand, sometimes refs don't see that the situation has to be reviewed, i didn't think of that.
Well but there still are problems. In football, the pitch is many, many times larger than a tennis court and the lines are sometimes not as visible as in other sports. And how does the camera decide, if it was the ball or just a head, which was going over the line?
+Etherion Refs aren't allowed to use replays as confirmation of goals .
clicked off the video when sepp Blatter came
i was wondering the same thing. there is probably some chip, or something inside the ball that triggers the response. so when an arm or leg or an entire player crosses it, it will not mark it as a goal.
Still need video reviews of decisions and post-match review systems.
Is the referee reading a script? O_o
in my opinion before deciding if there was goal or not refs should look at the slowmo replay then decide just like in American football, with this thing you just have more ways to rig the game
What people are afraid of is that replays would slow down the game. But I think they should do it during important games or, more specifically, starting at the 80th minute of an important match while the teams are searching for the winning goal.
ybk360 To let the game slow down when the players are tired might be bad... or good.
Should they have timeouts too?
This system eliminates the need for the refs to take the time to review a replay.
Angel Bonilla There was no need for sarcasm. He's absolutely right. Most of American games are usually being reviewed by the referrers in slow motion in order to make a right call. What's point to waste your time to wait this technology to develop efficiently in the meanwhile most of matches get slaughtered by referees rather than just looking the cameras ?
If goal line technology existed in 1966, England’s goal in the World Cup final would not have counted
They always have quick option for photo review - both are tested when system is used.
just put a camera or sensor above the goal line, everytime the ball passes that line, the watch says "Goal" 1 sensor and camera per goal instead of a these wires and technology
+Erik Arustamyan or even better install a small go pro inside the goal post so it won't affect balls being blocked and face it towards the other post and also ask the fucking rules to change where if footage shows a goal credit it rather than following the blind af referee
why did they only use it in the world cup? did not see it in the liga or ucl
It's in epl
+yazan774 UEFA wil implement the technology in 2016-2017 UCL.
also did some research its really expensive, talkin like 500k to be installed in one stadium
+Melbourne Freekickerz thats not that much compared to the price of the clubs
Bpl
Do one for offside
Nice Goal SIu
Haha he is definitely reading that at 6:26
he is TURKİSH referee
Fenerbahçe cs one of the worst referees ever
Why?
What is the point of this "high Tech" if the ref can't even change his decision
Exactly
the ref is allowed to change his decision.. it happened couple of times in soccer.. if there is a definitive reason to change it.. most recent to memory is kloses goal that was awarded then was cancelled when he told the ref he scored it with his hand.. then the ref cancelled the goal..
good on him
Abran Alvarez well it just happened in the fa cup final this year
DIOS NOS BENDIGA Y CUIDE A USTEDES Y A SUS FAMILIAS SIEMPRE. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪.
Nice
VAI CORINTHIANS
CAMPEÃO 2012
Script 6:27
+josh m ^^^^
He was reading it so he can speak better in english
+Alfie Williams No, you can see a shadow holding something like a gun that was pointed at him!
He is turkish
Be respect.He is speak other language.What do you want? He speak like an Englishman?
in the goal-ref technology which uses a magnetic field .. a passive electronic chip is implanted into the ball ...
this is good.
Why cant they just put couple of go pros in the net?
I know right, it's easier than waiting for two years to have it installed
It's harder to make an instant decision with cameras. You have to watch the replay and decide. Since football time is always going it takes unnecessary time.
+Joel Ayala doesn't matter. The game already is so long and time is wasted on every occassion (throw in's, corner kick, freekick etc). also those situations don't happen really often, so i would rather have a correct decision and play 94 instead of 92 minutes than having a wrong decision and just save two minutes. In the end those two minutes don't matter at all.
i think most football fans would prefer no replays
slows the game down too much
Why do they use windows XP ?
Because it took a very long time to develop, and it's probably a hassle to redesign it for anything else.
Andy Cox windows 7 was out in 2010 when they decided to make it...
TyloriusTechTips It doesn't make a different any OS will do the job.
because in real business world, not everything require "upgrade" just because there is a new version available for something. or go with orkham's razor, simplest explanation: they had a XP client at that day.
these kind of software are usually developed platform-independent. xp or vista or 7 or 8 is not relevant. they are just operating systems, hence tools.
exactly people need to understand that the underline technology is what matters and user interface is just for the avg users
They should set it up to where it flashes green lights on the post if the goal has been scored.
I think its cool to work in this, work as a football tester