JUST IN: Supreme Court Hears Case Of 94-Year-Old Woman Who Lost Condo Due To Unpaid Tax Bill
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 апр 2023
- On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Tyler v. Hennepin County.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
Hennepin County thieves! Abuse of power! Stealing from the poorest and most in need. How dare they do this to this senior citizen.
Arrest all those responsible!
After 75 years old we should let seniors not to pay property taxes
Especially since their monies have been taxed several times by that age and retirement.
OMG!!!!!! WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT POOR WOMAN???
WHAT HORRIFIC CRIMES THESE BUREAUCRATS WILL COMMIT FOR MONEY AND POWER!!!! THIS IS TERRIFYING!!!!!
Meanwhile they are using our money to give free housing and repairs to others. Just wow….
States do this wa state too homes from mostly srs they had no where to go just because they wanted to enlarge the community college property
What this county did to this lady is so unjust. At 94, they evict her, take her house, sell it for way less than it's worth, and keep the money. The government sees the elderly as expendable and not of sound mind, so it's easy to take advantage of them. Who was handling this lady's affairs? Paying her monthly bills? This should have never happened. What happened to her? She was probably banished to some depressing nursing home. Disgusting 😔
94 years old. State should be ashamed for adding penalties and the way they proceeded.
Retired people should have significant tax cuts and exemptions.
People need to obtain their allodial title to the property. If you don't you don't actually own it. Same for your car, but they call it the allodial title the MCO.
I am finished with Fox News since they 'fired' Tucker Carlson. I am now joining Forbes Breaking News for my morning news.
$2000 actual bill, $13,000 interest. Yup, these are the holy values that we push at gnpoint on the world
I'd say it becomes a taking when the state takes more then the debt owed.
"You will own nothing, and be happy..."
The government's action in this case is wild and inappropriate. Never move to Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Read the briefs. She was given tonnes of opportunities.
@@dohaatletico5684 I just started but amount of chances has no impact on rightfully returning excess over debt.
Where was the family to help their Grandma? My Grandma lived to 100 and would never dreamed to not help her! This is crazy, in your 90s people tend to not be able to help themselves. 😢
From what i know the grandma lived in another place and wasnt just left to dry
Where can I find a condo for $40,000 🤨
With regard to Hennepin County, I have personally dealt with them ~ they provide help through their Navigator program... This program forces you into a Confession of Judgement agreement whether or not you're able to afford it; assuming you won't be able to follow through so the County will eventually be able to take your property. I had no choice but to sign a COJ, they showed up at my door with the papers to sign; I am a 55 year old disabled woman who got behind on my property taxes when my husband left. I live on a very low fixed income, but none of this mattered, I had no choice - I recorded all of this when they showed up at my door - The Hennepin County Navigator person promised to help me with a budget so I could make the COJ payments, but once the papers were signed, he disappeared and I have heard nothing again. The County zooms in on those of us whose homes are paid for, with no mortgage and get behind on our taxes; they do NOT try to help us, they WANT our properties - that's the bottom line here.
Outrageous act
What is the matter with America ?
This is gross
No direct taxation without direct representation.
Government overreach.
Sickening
Statute of Gloucester & feudal lords owning this🤣😂🤣😂
Ridiculous argument but lawyers will argue anything.
TACO BELL COURT with constitution milk🤣😂🤣😂
Your Cestui Que Vie Trusts." Birth certificate paid in full for toir home. if a person is considered lost at sea, abandoned, dead, a lunatic, a minor or incompetent (has a Cestui Que Vie Trust) then not only may their property be held in guardianship, but that a contract may be established called an "annuity" whereby a value may be granted to the guardian or custodian by the purchaser of the contract in exchange for some form of ongoing income derived from maximising the value of the estate of the infant, lunatic, lost or "dead" person. The result is the birth of annuities through such acts of parliament as Life Annuities in 1703 .
The court is protecting the DEFACTO kingdom in America
Taxes aren't that old. 200 years? Lolol
Im deeply concerned after listening to justices questions 😳
Yes. Why are they sking hypotheticals. Who care if the stock market crashes tommorrow? The morney was stolen yesterday. It's as simple as simon, Pay it back. With interest and costs.
How much does it cost to get a hearing all the way to the supreme court?
Build a new Supreme Court building and integrate it with the DC Sanitary Sewer System with a large fountain works at the Court entrance.
Why? They ruled correctly in this case.
If i owe you $20 bucks and all i have is a $100 dollar bill, would it not be fair to take the $100 and say you get no change back cause i took it, now it is mine, that's the law, this corrupt court said 200 years ago? Only the Government can come up with an unreasonable law. Anyone of us try to rob grandma and we should go to jail for theft or fraud or... Who is wrong is ridiculous.
They thought she wouldnt fight over $25k.
people in government do not make money no pains and penalties people need to know money taxes cant in set harm the taking
Defining the details regarding the “takings clause” and “excessive fines” seems to be what is being argued here, is that correct? Blurred lines between abandonment versus forfeiture, then throw in intent to further complicate; clear definition is needed for questions that weren’t asked.
She said comment law... kings law.
Jackson sounds out of her element here.
I think shes the only sane one
See have to look in her real estate contract. Some places do property taxes.
You can't put judges against the tax laws agreed upon for immigrants. Or the real estate office. Well I think contracts matter . She's probably not supposed to be in the supreme Court at the moment. We really must keep the courts ethical. And people have to make sure they're in the correct level of court. I think this particular case will cause the courts to be a little bit unethical and we don't want that to happen
Sounds like MinniChina 🇨🇳
Evil Corp
Magna Carta < Indian law ?
So, doesn't she have to go to the small claims and sue for her remaining balance because they charged her too much. So if she gets fifteen hundred back then she might gotta sue for it in a different court that's not a supreme Court. Maybe some kind of circuit court. But I believe this case will cause the courts to be slightly unethical because .
But if that court refuses and she prove the judge was wrong then she would use that court because the judge was wrong. But she gotta use the ladder system though. But isn't that for people being charged or correcting a mistake from some type of criminal court. But people have to learn if their in the right court.
The bill of right applies in all states it so easy to fine the true.
These so-called courts are not "in law" but are simply acting on behalf of a corporate business enforcing it's contracts under the disguise of Equity Courts, Superior courts, Federal courts, District courts, Municipal Courts--Merchant Law, Military Law, Marshall Law, Summary Court Martial proceedings, and administrative ad hock tribunals (similar to Admiralty/Maritime) and appear to be governed by "The Manual of Courts Martial (under Acts of War) and the War Powers Act of 1933.
We need to END the EMERGENCY DECLARATION since we under of COLOR OF LAW.
What do you mean when you say: "it so easy to fine the true" ?
ive said that we have rights to take back our country given to us by god and the forefathers
Was this from death taxes?
No.
Yearly property taxes
She is going to be fine..she is in an apt and they are going to give her money ...
clown world
3 Saal say intazar may ho may is Kadar,,pata na ha Kuch fasla kaya Hoga mayray makadar ka
Hunter Biden headed to court: a solid fact. Nowhere to find this news 😂😂😂😂
The so-called courts are actually Corporate Arbitration Boards
Consisting of an Arbitrator
(so-called "Judge")
and a panel of corporate employees
(so-called "Juries")
Panel decisions (recommendation)
can be reversed by the Arbitrator
The so-called judge, a corporate "black-robe" referee, an actor (acting judge), sitting under a gold or yellow fringe flag becomes the "captain" or "master" of that ship or enclave and he has absolute power to make the rules at his whim as he goes. The so-called judge will sometimes not allow all of the facts to be heard because of his bias or is following orders of the corporate so-called government who may even want to have the case sealed from the public.
If one does not conform to the judge's wishes, the judge, without proper cause, will send the non-conformist to a psychiatric ward for evaluation (intimidation) and sometimes left there to be drugged and not released until one is willing to conform to the judge's bias.
This has happened many times in the latter years and has been personally witnessed by Myself concerning friends
Shitty, but if you dont pay yoru tax bill you can lose your home
The case isn't about loss of her home, it's about the amount owed!
And meanwhile, able body people are receiving free housing, food, etc., on the the tax payers dime and are not required to work. This is completely wrong to do to a 92 year old woman. Confiscating her home to pay for the debt, then to keep all of the money? No, it’s wrong.
She deserves government fee housing allowance