DesTestMAX C64 Test Cartridge Build & Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 янв 2025

Комментарии • 49

  • @horusfalcon
    @horusfalcon Месяц назад +3

    A neat piece of kit you have there, Jan. Thanks for showing it to us.

  • @3dlabs99
    @3dlabs99 Месяц назад +5

    6:22 Super human fast soldering... even faster than BigClive :) Thanks for all the great content!

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад

      Haha, I wish I could solder at that speed in real life sometimes... :D

  • @TzOk
    @TzOk Месяц назад +6

    You can use this test (as well as a dead test) on Kung Fu Flash and Kung Fu Flash 2. Yes, there is a new version of this great cartridge, but no one talks about it. I have just built one for myself, and it is great. At first glance, it is good old KFF, but there is one new option in the setup-REU emulation, which is a game changer for me. Another small change is that it no longer uses Flash for emulating CRT cartridges, now it loads them into its own RAM.

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +1

      Nice! I had no idea that there's a beefed up version of the KFF. I'm going to have to check that out asap.

    • @davemcd2579
      @davemcd2579 Месяц назад +1

      would love to know the steps to get this to work. Kims Github says rom files are supported (same with .bin files) but neither seem to work for me at all. Unless the KFF i got is just a poor implementation (apologies if you got this comment as a duplicate) I was logged into youtube under my work account not personal so deleted that and reasked as me :)

    • @TzOk
      @TzOk Месяц назад

      @@davemcd2579 For Ultimax cartridges (like DeadTest or DesTestMAX) you need to have them in CRT format.
      BTW Jan made a mistake, DTM needs to work in Ultimax mode, not in Game mode, labels on the PCB were correct.

  • @dieSpinnt
    @dieSpinnt Месяц назад +1

    "You don't need the CIA(s) to work ...", Jan Beta 0:50
    Oh boy, oh Jan, we are back on the watchlist!
    Hehehehe and thanks for sharing your impressions on this nice piece of test equipment:)

  • @borayurt66
    @borayurt66 Месяц назад +3

    This is so revolutionary that I think Matt should also have a go at writing a new full diagnostic software too.

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +4

      Matt is working on improved DesTest software as we speak. ;)

    • @borayurt66
      @borayurt66 Месяц назад +3

      @JanBeta Great news!!

  • @datassetteuser356
    @datassetteuser356 Месяц назад +8

    The Destest has more tests than the Deadtest does. Say that five times in a row real fast 😂

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +4

      Haha. I actually had to edit quite a few sentences like that out where I twisted my tongue a little bit too much. ::D

    • @horusfalcon
      @horusfalcon Месяц назад +2

      "How many tests can a DesTest test if a DesTest makes all tests"? 😆

  • @christopherdecorte1599
    @christopherdecorte1599 Месяц назад +7

    Its funny the the future might still be 8 bit because of the way modern software is being so intrusive on everyones freedom's and gathering personal data i have been avoiding my modern computer a lot because of windows 11.

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +2

      Yeah, Windows 11 is a bit of a nightmare. I love using the old machines as much as I can. Unfortunately they are not powerful enough for HD video editing and such. :D

    • @christopherdecorte1599
      @christopherdecorte1599 Месяц назад

      @JanBeta yeah my pentium 3 pc win win 98 does most tasks with office 97 and play many of the games I enjoy so I use it more then my modern pc.

  • @twocvbloke
    @twocvbloke Месяц назад +2

    Seeing tools like these being made today for repairing and reviving computers older than me makes me wonder if in 40 years time, people will be reviving and repairing devices of today for that "retro nostalgia" of what they experience right now as children growing up... :)

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +1

      Not sure if today's devices offer the same level of affection that we had for the machines back in the day. It all seems pretty soulless to me these days but who knows? :D

    • @dieSpinnt
      @dieSpinnt Месяц назад

      @@JanBeta There are still(or again) Vinyl Records ... and you can get really maintainable (for fixing in the future, and f.e. "The right to repair" movement, Open Hardware, etc.) and quality-oriented hardware, even today.
      Well, it is just (just ... hehehehe) a matter how big you wallet is:)
      Just as a side-note: remember how much a 1541 and discs cost back in the day? I needed PARENTS to remotely afford this **g**
      So buying hardware for the equivalent of a months loan may even get you something for "eternity", today. Well designed, pretty and nice to look at for decades. Yeah okay, we have to de-solder all components and get rid of this new rubbish, refloat all joints with the real (LEADED! hehehe) stuff!
      Have a good one Jan and @twocvbloke!:)

  • @C64Lover
    @C64Lover Месяц назад +4

    I recently built one and so far I see that while it is improvement over dead test, my own mod of dead test (movie is on my channel) still does suffice, actually real game changer would be microcontroller that listen to bus and do some auto-analysis, otherwise if there is more damage than ram you get blank screen here and on dead test as well

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +3

      As far as I know Matt is working on improving the DesTest a fair bit. It's going to be A LOT more useful soon.

  • @KAPTKipper
    @KAPTKipper Месяц назад +4

    You can also just load it on to a flash cart, like the Kungfu Flash

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +2

      Yes, of course! Should probably have mentioned that. I like to have standalone test carts though, in case something prevents the more complex multicarts from starting up.

  • @Phil-Sands
    @Phil-Sands Месяц назад +3

    Just ordered one 😁

  • @hollgo626
    @hollgo626 Месяц назад +3

    Ich habe mir eins gebastelt und schon 2 64er damit untersuchen lassen. Ist s hon cool, wie schnell der Test im Vergleich zum deadtest abläuft und dazu viel übersichtlicher in der Darstellung. Ich habe auch noch den Ultramaxtest, der ist ja auch eine Art deadtest. Da der destest einen eigenen charset mitbringt, würde sogar bei einem defekten character rom noch eine leserliche Ausgabe auf dem Bildschirm kommen, beim deadtest kommt in so einem Fall ja nur ein komisches muster heraus. Jetzt müsste es nur mal eine neue Art diagrom geben,das wäre was...

    • @RetroShare2
      @RetroShare2 Месяц назад

      Hallo. Hast du eine Anleitung, wo ich mir das nachbauen kann?

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +1

      Eigentlich zeige ich im Video alles, was du wissen musst. In der beiliegenden pdf-Anleitung ist auch nochmal näher erklärt, wie du eine Platine konfigurieren musst, damit das Teil funktioniert. Geht mit allen Standard-8K-Platinen, die es so gibt.

  • @Explore531
    @Explore531 Месяц назад

    that theme sound is like c64 Moon Patrol at the beginning

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад

      It’s from the game "Flip & Flop", actually. Played back on a slightly broken SID from one of the first C64s I repaired. :)

  • @dcarlin3
    @dcarlin3 Месяц назад +1

    Have you tried DesTestMax SwiftLink edition? Don’t even need a working VIC chip or any RAM!

    • @C64Lover
      @C64Lover Месяц назад

      @@dcarlin3 without vic you don't have cpu clock and dead test or destestmax do already start without ram so...

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад

      I don't have a serial adapter for the C64 unfortunately (yet), so I couldn't test that. I doubt that it would start up without a VIC-II though, because that is responsible for providing the system clocks as well (among some other crucial things).

  • @arnolda.lampel6087
    @arnolda.lampel6087 Месяц назад +3

    Cool 😎
    More Retro Sh!t that I don't need but want 😊
    Edit: I do need AND want one.

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад

      Haha. I feel the same. :D

  • @giulianomarco
    @giulianomarco Месяц назад +2

    Yay! 😁👍

  • @noggin73
    @noggin73 Месяц назад +1

    Why does the deadtest/destest only test the lowest 4k of RAM?

    • @C64Lover
      @C64Lover Месяц назад +1

      Because ultimax

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +2

      It's because of the Ultimax mode it runs it. It only lets it access 4K of RAM. Matt is working on a version that can see all 64K currently.

    • @C64Lover
      @C64Lover Месяц назад

      @@JanBeta actually it's possible to have one image start as ultimax (it bypass kernal so irq/nmi/reset vectors are in the end) ans well as regular 8k cart (CBM80 signature and vectors in the front) edit: and the latter can use 64k

  • @rager-69
    @rager-69 Месяц назад +1

    Jan, do you ever use your sponsor, PCBWay?

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +1

      Yup, I do order PCBs from them quite frequently. I have a lot of stuff that people sent me though so I'm often showing other PCBs, too.

  • @Nukle0n
    @Nukle0n Месяц назад

    Don't even need the wire links to jump those connections. Just put a blob of solder over it.

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад

      Yup. I just wanted to do it in a more reliable way. I think the PCB is laid out to use pin headers and physical jumpers really. There's other cartridge PCBs (like the Versa64) that have proper pads for solder blobs, too. :)

  • @myleft9397
    @myleft9397 Месяц назад +1

    Program. No verify. Ballsy. Good video.

    • @mal2ksc
      @mal2ksc Месяц назад

      What's it going to do if it isn't properly programmed, corrupt the nonexistent hard drive on his C64?

    • @JanBeta
      @JanBeta  Месяц назад +1

      The programmer software does a verify pass automatically so no need to trigger it manually again. ;)

  • @terryraymond7984
    @terryraymond7984 Месяц назад

    please make me one up and I will give it a try , Ha Ha

  • @april7_
    @april7_ Месяц назад +1

    You say that many chips fail, so have you any clue why this is happening, are they too old or too used? As In the 80's they last 10 years of daily use never failing, just curious as I have many models stored, unused over 30 years and planning to test and use them some day!