I hope when SAN blows up in popularity it sticks to facts because I like a non biased approach. It’s either fact or it isn’t. We need to speak truth rather than speaking narrative. 👍🏼
Hypersonics are getting a lot of headlines, but conventional cruise missiles and munitions are still in much wider use, and will be for awhile until the cost of producing hypersonics comes down.
Everyone whinging about this needs to remember Australia is the only developed nation and functional democracy in the Southern Hemisphere. Forget South Africa it is riddled with corruption. Apart from that it’s Australia. We need to ensure Australia has a strong defensive posture.
Bvllshit. This has nothing to do with democracy, nobody here got to vote on our politicians getting bought out by US oil companies to pillage our land for nothing in return. The US is not our friend, nor is China. Why tf should we get involved in their disputes and make ourselves a target in the process?
We paid 1.3 billion for 200 which is over 6 million per shot. The money we spend each year on Aboriginal Welfare alone would buy us more than 5000. We could have bought an extra 70 with the money we spent on the Voice referendum.
Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Enterprise, $21 billion over the next decade to manufacture our own munitions. 🇦🇺 that’s a lot of Australian money and worth it !
China definitely got the US attention, even guam is being hardened right now. This is the start of increased inexorable USA/Aussie/UK north america dominance globally (minus their beneficial trade compact or the world trade organisation, which subsidized the globe, aussies should be way richer/well off to be honest look at what resources they have). Russia lost its bases in Syria and can't even project properly into Africa anymore or the middle east. Well those missiles can probably be fired if it really had to from the other side of Indonesian islands into the south china sea or further. I don't think after years of threats aussies want to relax any more or daily internet hacking and stealing of secrets. The USA no longer also has to hold onto the mid-range treaty restrictions and have many longer range air to air missiles now and surfacer to air. They thought with the russian-lame backbone of their military they could do this at a certain distance. Not anymore, what used to be 300 is now 1500 or 2500. The west has bases globally all around Eurasia and beyond. No its the mirror principle in force from you so this use of the principle must be attributed to something, turning a dark thing into a benevolent easy going one - you came to the wrong channel maybe though its doubtful, you could be perturbed or trying to perturb others, steel yourself though; rather its the other way round china want's attention and there's a reason for their threats as its really a cry of help since they might want to push around several nations near them (not india as india is too strong) and they want Taiwan diplomatically but can't force the issue, however they may try and the region even now is probably too armed-up, Taiwan is even making anti ship missiles and will get more; not even a blockade is going to end well even if it comes on softly; not sure who will fire the first missile, because when everyone is baring down on them and its the soft approach they will have to end the blockade - they probably don't even want to leave port to be honest: you can spare a thought for those sailors who will be at the bottom of the sea. Also it will be a brave army that tries to get even one division onshore Taiwan and try to simultaneously hold a siege of the island. Its not sustainable and china will collapse economically. They might do it if they have no other hope (which it looks like tbh). If North K jumps in that means elements will cause havok in south K and Japan and so forth the reverse, so it could get hairy but the central issue is china remaining whole after the conflict. The Chinese population is down at around 850-900 million. (which also means something I've known for years anyway, now you know) that their GDP is 30-50% less anyway, and since they are bankrupt now they are funneling funny money into the economy and a higher proportion into their security, they can't feed themselves or provide energy enough to themselves, and their green energy ambitions are highly vulnerable - they are also trying to ruin and wreck every western company in china, right now and for years too, and company's have been moving back to the USA and other places for years now, almost over a decade now. lol you're going to war, chumpy whether you like it or not. they're at war with the west right now. its a lame kind of war, and when or if they do want to fight their nation is going to crumble - the thing is even if they don't push their conflicts or flex their diminutively incapable armed forces (who don't actually want to fight, the political side might, for political reasons of preservation) they will crumble anyway. Thats whats before them and if you're not one of them, thats whats before you anyway. If they grow a brain between then and now they can limit it to turning not on Taiwan and others, but only themselves, because there will be breakaway regions galore there; they won't have a vibrant consumer economy and their currency will lose most of its value. China is so shaky they make threats to everyone, and they are pretty jittery right now; and for years Xi has been trying to shake the military into being firm on fighting which they simply don't want to fight all that much. Allies have about 1000 fighter aircraft in the region. You think some hypersonics from china are going to wreck their day? They could fly a bomber force with 700 missiles onto china in a heartbeat; 3 layers of bombers including firing from stand off ranges. Chinese people themselves are facing their assets to be worthless, and are going to the wall slowly or quickly, depending on their situation. Tourism into and out of china will dry up and world wide borders will close. This is not a time to relax. Immigration will largely be a thing of the past outside the US British dominion and some of westerrn europe and possibly Poland (its already slightly harder to get into UK right now for example), and these weapons will dominate the entire region, and the west will stop any funny business anywhere it is and especially into the western hemisphere. This is more or less the start of USA/Aussie/UK canada who might even join USA, and north america/caribean, its the start of their total global protectionist dominance - korea must pay for protection, 40B, Japan, Germany, all of them, aussies? Not so - they are in the triumvirate. You may not even see the name "China" on a map by 2050. Its a region, not a country anyway. If you remove the 40 years we all helped china, right, and cut it out the timeline, this is how the world would of been anyway - USA with 80 trillion economy, Aussies at 2-3, UK 9-10, etc. They only did it so china could afford to buy our goods. Now its going back to how it used to be, and always will be. Russia is not a global player anymore, now will china be either. The above is what they are arguing about within the government there right now and for some time. I'd imagine what you said is exactly what millitary people say about being pushed into conflict, the whole spine is russian gear with some hybrid lame china stuff. Its not going to cut it. There's a reeason why land launched hypersonic and air launch is good enough/close enough, and they will put Hypersonic on only 3 ships and a couple of subs. With quicksink and many other types of fires hypersonic's are just another missile. They lauded it because they saw how Putin lauded his new missiles in 2018. How did that turn out. There's literally 45-50 bases nearby china from the USA. The USA has buffered its borders/forts and cut down the traversal time and are using places like australia and phillipines more - once thought not possible. Thats why they think Hypersonics in china are a good thing, they're not going to do what china might of thought in the media. So that means sorry for long wordplay, aussies have tommahawk long, naval strike missile, and sm3 and 6 coming on. Thats real good and the best radars and direction on earth. The hypersonic glide's can be shot down regularly - so that is why the aussies and usa can/will use them aboard aircraft and land launch too. Different types, but hypersonic will probably so I assume not replace the usual missiles all over, rather, specific situations. Tommahawk block V is good. The important thing about missiles is that they arrive where they should and also defend as they should.
It is funny you are a Chinese nationalist but your own Government does not like you, Xi Jinping is not a Nationalist, and so your view of the world is very different then his. If you want China to do what you think, then you need to replace Xi Jinping. So you have a lot of work to do.
@@BroadcastRyan22 Yes. But while these sites allow for U.S. military presence and operations, _note that there is no permanent U.S. military presence at them._ Instead they're used for rotational deployments and joint exercises with Philippine forces. Short version: they ain't no Guam.
There's 45-50 bases in the whole region. Because people want the west - you are probably even right now trying to emulate the west, and being western. Beats being eastern.
I hope when SAN blows up in popularity it sticks to facts because I like a non biased approach. It’s either fact or it isn’t. We need to speak truth rather than speaking narrative. 👍🏼
Yes Guam is important, but don't forget the many other islands in the Pacific that we have full access to.
Of course the major advantages include the relatively low per round cost and the US inventory of over 5000 missiles.
Isn’t cruise missile obsoleted with Hypersonic missile going more mainstream?
Hypersonics are getting a lot of headlines, but conventional cruise missiles and munitions are still in much wider use, and will be for awhile until the cost of producing hypersonics comes down.
Hypersonics will never be mainstream, they take a lot of energy to build up speed & are no where near as accurate anyway.
Cost.
@@douglasnakamura6753 you could say the same about ballistic missiles. And yet
Everyone whinging about this needs to remember Australia is the only developed nation and functional democracy in the Southern Hemisphere. Forget South Africa it is riddled with corruption. Apart from that it’s Australia. We need to ensure Australia has a strong defensive posture.
Bvllshit. This has nothing to do with democracy, nobody here got to vote on our politicians getting bought out by US oil companies to pillage our land for nothing in return. The US is not our friend, nor is China. Why tf should we get involved in their disputes and make ourselves a target in the process?
Ah yes China is afraid of Australia's democracy. You people need to have your heads examined.
Can we bring grocery and house prices down though?
Don't get mad when a company fires a bunch of people and unemployment goes up.
@@SumTingWong888 their profits have only increased, not wages you daft person
I love your massive touchscreen & your using it for Google Earth is outstanding!
Who the hell even fears cruise missile. 😂
Australia is not on the table.
What?
It costs 2 Million per shot
Dont you worry. You’re not paying for them.
We paid 1.3 billion for 200 which is over 6 million per shot. The money we spend each year on Aboriginal Welfare alone would buy us more than 5000. We could have bought an extra 70 with the money we spent on the Voice referendum.
Congratulations!!! 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Enterprise, $21 billion over the next decade to manufacture our own munitions. 🇦🇺 that’s a lot of Australian money and worth it !
Who already thought they could do this?
who would care about clowns?
You're right. No one cares about China.
For 1 aus tomahawk, china can produce 5 or more CJ10. So how that fare?
Also tomahawk just subsonic
You made that up didn't you 🤣🤣🤣
@douglasnakamura6753 chatgpt is free chat.
How much money do you get from us government?
can you please stop trying to get chinas attention? im just trying to play video games and relax
China definitely got the US attention, even guam is being hardened right now. This is the start of increased inexorable USA/Aussie/UK north america dominance globally (minus their beneficial trade compact or the world trade organisation, which subsidized the globe, aussies should be way richer/well off to be honest look at what resources they have). Russia lost its bases in Syria and can't even project properly into Africa anymore or the middle east. Well those missiles can probably be fired if it really had to from the other side of Indonesian islands into the south china sea or further. I don't think after years of threats aussies want to relax any more or daily internet hacking and stealing of secrets. The USA no longer also has to hold onto the mid-range treaty restrictions and have many longer range air to air missiles now and surfacer to air. They thought with the russian-lame backbone of their military they could do this at a certain distance. Not anymore, what used to be 300 is now 1500 or 2500. The west has bases globally all around Eurasia and beyond. No its the mirror principle in force from you so this use of the principle must be attributed to something, turning a dark thing into a benevolent easy going one - you came to the wrong channel maybe though its doubtful, you could be perturbed or trying to perturb others, steel yourself though; rather its the other way round china want's attention and there's a reason for their threats as its really a cry of help since they might want to push around several nations near them (not india as india is too strong) and they want Taiwan diplomatically but can't force the issue, however they may try and the region even now is probably too armed-up, Taiwan is even making anti ship missiles and will get more; not even a blockade is going to end well even if it comes on softly; not sure who will fire the first missile, because when everyone is baring down on them and its the soft approach they will have to end the blockade - they probably don't even want to leave port to be honest: you can spare a thought for those sailors who will be at the bottom of the sea. Also it will be a brave army that tries to get even one division onshore Taiwan and try to simultaneously hold a siege of the island. Its not sustainable and china will collapse economically. They might do it if they have no other hope (which it looks like tbh). If North K jumps in that means elements will cause havok in south K and Japan and so forth the reverse, so it could get hairy but the central issue is china remaining whole after the conflict. The Chinese population is down at around 850-900 million. (which also means something I've known for years anyway, now you know) that their GDP is 30-50% less anyway, and since they are bankrupt now they are funneling funny money into the economy and a higher proportion into their security, they can't feed themselves or provide energy enough to themselves, and their green energy ambitions are highly vulnerable - they are also trying to ruin and wreck every western company in china, right now and for years too, and company's have been moving back to the USA and other places for years now, almost over a decade now. lol you're going to war, chumpy whether you like it or not. they're at war with the west right now. its a lame kind of war, and when or if they do want to fight their nation is going to crumble - the thing is even if they don't push their conflicts or flex their diminutively incapable armed forces (who don't actually want to fight, the political side might, for political reasons of preservation) they will crumble anyway. Thats whats before them and if you're not one of them, thats whats before you anyway. If they grow a brain between then and now they can limit it to turning not on Taiwan and others, but only themselves, because there will be breakaway regions galore there; they won't have a vibrant consumer economy and their currency will lose most of its value.
China is so shaky they make threats to everyone, and they are pretty jittery right now; and for years Xi has been trying to shake the military into being firm on fighting which they simply don't want to fight all that much. Allies have about 1000 fighter aircraft in the region. You think some hypersonics from china are going to wreck their day? They could fly a bomber force with 700 missiles onto china in a heartbeat; 3 layers of bombers including firing from stand off ranges.
Chinese people themselves are facing their assets to be worthless, and are going to the wall slowly or quickly, depending on their situation. Tourism into and out of china will dry up and world wide borders will close. This is not a time to relax. Immigration will largely be a thing of the past outside the US British dominion and some of westerrn europe and possibly Poland (its already slightly harder to get into UK right now for example), and these weapons will dominate the entire region, and the west will stop any funny business anywhere it is and especially into the western hemisphere.
This is more or less the start of USA/Aussie/UK canada who might even join USA, and north america/caribean, its the start of their total global protectionist dominance - korea must pay for protection, 40B, Japan, Germany, all of them, aussies? Not so - they are in the triumvirate. You may not even see the name "China" on a map by 2050. Its a region, not a country anyway. If you remove the 40 years we all helped china, right, and cut it out the timeline, this is how the world would of been anyway - USA with 80 trillion economy, Aussies at 2-3, UK 9-10, etc. They only did it so china could afford to buy our goods. Now its going back to how it used to be, and always will be.
Russia is not a global player anymore, now will china be either. The above is what they are arguing about within the government there right now and for some time. I'd imagine what you said is exactly what millitary people say about being pushed into conflict, the whole spine is russian gear with some hybrid lame china stuff. Its not going to cut it.
There's a reeason why land launched hypersonic and air launch is good enough/close enough, and they will put Hypersonic on only 3 ships and a couple of subs. With quicksink and many other types of fires hypersonic's are just another missile. They lauded it because they saw how Putin lauded his new missiles in 2018. How did that turn out. There's literally 45-50 bases nearby china from the USA. The USA has buffered its borders/forts and cut down the traversal time and are using places like australia and phillipines more - once thought not possible. Thats why they think Hypersonics in china are a good thing, they're not going to do what china might of thought in the media.
So that means sorry for long wordplay, aussies have tommahawk long, naval strike missile, and sm3 and 6 coming on. Thats real good and the best radars and direction on earth. The hypersonic glide's can be shot down regularly - so that is why the aussies and usa can/will use them aboard aircraft and land launch too. Different types, but hypersonic will probably so I assume not replace the usual missiles all over, rather, specific situations. Tommahawk block V is good. The important thing about missiles is that they arrive where they should and also defend as they should.
🎖️
Toutube cancels truth.
Lol scared China bot? Prove to me your not a bot. Also why doesn't anyone want to move to China 😂? Probably cause you hate non chineese
@@turboleggy Trump supporter rube. they cancelled my anti china post.
Another propaganda channel sponsored by Washington DC.
It is funny you are a Chinese nationalist but your own Government does not like you, Xi Jinping is not a Nationalist, and so your view of the world is very different then his. If you want China to do what you think, then you need to replace Xi Jinping. So you have a lot of work to do.
There are no US bases in The Philippines
That's not accurate. In 2016 the two countries signed an Expanded Defense Cooperation Agreement, which was expanded on in 2023
@@BroadcastRyan22 Yes. But while these sites allow for U.S. military presence and operations, _note that there is no permanent U.S. military presence at them._ Instead they're used for rotational deployments and joint exercises with Philippine forces. Short version: they ain't no Guam.
@@dixonpinfold2582 nothing is Guam, except Guam
There's 45-50 bases in the whole region. Because people want the west - you are probably even right now trying to emulate the west, and being western. Beats being eastern.
I dont think China is cares
Yet...
What language is that, Chin?
@@greatplainsman3662don't think so at all. You think they won't go into overcapacity mode with their military hardware?
@@greatplainsman3662don't think so at all. Not scaring them
@@TuanTran-h5fyup they have a lot of things to worry about like Taiwan and ph and 2nm chips lol😂😂