An exceptional documentation of an exceptional instrument in an exceptional building. There is so much creative intelligence in evidence: Manuel Rosales, Frank Gehry, Cameron Carpenter, Brian Lauritzen. One day I will attend an organ concert to have the total experience.
I may be wrong, but I think I remember a Walt Disney “Goofy” cartoon where Goofy was sitting at an organ console, looking over his shoulder and grinning. The pipes were coming out at all angles. Was this cartoon the basis for the Disney organ? Hrc
+cowmissing *Manuel Rosales built the organ at Walt Disney Hall with a hybrid-action keydesk.* Five planes of trackers from the manuals and pedalboard, with columns of drawknobs controlling an electric stop action. C. B. Fisk, Inc., uses the same technology on terraced keydesks divorced from the main case, using carbon-fiber trackers from the manuals, on current projects. Any concerts where the organist used the integrated keydesk this opus?
An interesting video, though it's a pity that it has to be so repetitive. ("Tell them what you're going to tell them ... tell them ... tell them what you've told them." - The cliche outline for a sermon.) I wonder why Rosales' company did not build the organ, if he was considered to be suitable as the designer?
Offshoreorganbuilder Rosales has been doing much of his work in collaboration in recent years, especially for his larger projects. This began with the Fisk organ for Rice University in Houston. His first collaboration with Glatter-Goetz was Claremont United Church of Christ. Rosales has also collaborated with Dobson.
An exciting visual design. But "..you can't bend organ pipes"? Rubbish. Many organs have pipes that make bends (they are mitered) to help them fit into the space. This applies to both flues and reeds. If the organ we hear here is the actual organ, it sounds good for what is an instrument of relatively modest size for a modern concert instrument. But the marginal size limitation makes me wonder at versatility for the different demands of the organ repertoire.
I enjoyed this brief WDCH organ documentary. That being said -- I'm still unsure about how I feel about the organ's *visual design.* It is certainly a wonderful-sounding -- and beautifully crafted -- instrument, as well as an engineering marvel... but I'm still not "convinced" about the "tumbling-down forest" façade. *Avant garde experimentalism* is fine, to a point. But, in most cases, there is a fine line between *intriguing cleverness* and *wanton absurdity (Dadaism).* Where does *unbridled Ego* end and the *creation of Beauty* begin? A number of reknowned European organ-builders excel at creating very modern-looking organs -- but *none are so blatantly "visually inharmonious"* as the WDCH instrument. Yet I still find it, though intellectually exciting, to be *uncomfortably distracting* in some deep "psychic/aesthetic" place. Oh well, it's a done deal -- like it or not. Perhaps future years, and viewers, will pronounce the "final verdict." Ask me how I feel about it a year from now....
Bob H: Well said. "Wanton absurdity" nails it perfectly. (ROFLMAO) That collection of pipes in the middle has given me a new disdain for Frank Gehry. The whole eyesore reminds me of cigarette butts sticking out of an ashtray. Msrs Totota and Rosales, fortunately, seem to have managed to craft something that sounds pretty good, but thank God, Gehry didn't have much to say about the design of the console. 🌹
This thing was built in the late 20th Century using 15th centure technology. Diaphragm regulators. A tracker organ with an electric console and electric pulldown. SO much for tracker touch. What BS anyway. The real story behind this organ will likely never be heard. 2-1/2 years to do what any project would have taken 2 months. The organ has "Spunk" Why do the Violins, Piano and tubas have "Spunk" Yeah, Let's do it and it bankrupted Glatter-Gotz - along with a lot of financial crooked dealings. The fools who controlled the design had no skills in organ building. Let's see them gt Steinway give one of their pianos "Spunk" The builder IS the designer. What is it saying - It is a mockery of the dignity the majesty, the history of the pipe organ. Ahhh yes, Cameron has to bitch about the organ. How Did Edwin LaMere every play so well. You did a horribly expensive, needlessly complex, All thes epeople are busy patting themselves on the back. Opens to fanfare. All promotions by those who wish to promote themselves. Lookat Lincoln Center in New york. 20years later they tore out the organ and rebuilt the interior. All a big bust while the celebrities were congratualting themselves on designing a disaster. WHAT CRAP!!!
Times have and are changing. This is the 21st century. a 15th century organ simply will not do. A modern organ must have 'spunk' they must have real breath and power, if its lazy, droning on, soft, bland...No one will listen. But If it can play anything from classical to modern music and beyond, it will certainly last. This is disney we're talking about.
I see this phenomenon in a variety of forums, so when I see it I prepare myself for...in your words...CRAP. The phenomemon is a long rambling paragraph dripping with hostility...and falsehoods. Just so you know, hiding snippetts of falsehoods jammed in with multitudinous topics does not fool anyone.
robert shaw if by "15th century technology" you mean mechanical key action: I have played the Glatter-Gœtz/Rosales organ at Claremont United Church of Christ -- made a CD there, in fact (Raven label). The mechanical key action of that organ is one of the finest I have ever played anywhere, capable of extraordinary precision and nuance. So there's nothing archaic about it: it represents an absolutely up-to-the-minute technical and engineering sophistication. This organ should've taken two months to build?! You obviously know nothing about organ building!! Manuel Rosales is one of the finest organ builders in the world, especially in (but not limited to) the areas of tonal design and voicing. For you to be so dismissive of his work simply tells us that you lack any understanding. As to the dual consoles: I can imagine that Rosales' preference would have been for having only the mechanical console, but conductors often insist on having the second, movable console for ease in communication with the organist. The same was done by Klais for their organ at the Audimax at the Ruhruniversität in Bochum, Germany, which organ I once played (and both consoles work very well, each in its own way).
A fresh, contemporary take on the classic organ. Wonderful!
An exceptional documentation of an exceptional instrument in an exceptional building. There is so much creative intelligence in evidence: Manuel Rosales, Frank Gehry, Cameron Carpenter, Brian Lauritzen. One day I will attend an organ concert to have the total experience.
A great design for an organ
Pipe organ.. pipe dreams.. made into a reality.. Fascinating indeed 😃🎹🎼✨
Hermione Summers
did he just say 'confetti' ?! That stuff will be hidden in lost crevices in that place FOREVER!
The video makes it seem like the instrument was designed for one particular piece of music in mind.
Looks like a bag of fries but I guess that’s the idea
It's just WOW!!!
I may be wrong, but I think I remember a Walt Disney “Goofy” cartoon where Goofy was sitting at an organ console, looking over his shoulder and grinning. The pipes were coming out at all angles. Was this cartoon the basis for the Disney organ?
Hrc
Disney should make a movie about an organist.
Hear it in person, it's like watching the " Rockets Kick "
ive played that organ!
GOOD FOR YOUUUUU
It was so good!!
Man, I'm jealous...
So amanzing and extraordinary organ!
+cowmissing *Manuel Rosales built the organ at Walt Disney Hall with a hybrid-action keydesk.* Five planes of trackers from the manuals and pedalboard, with columns of drawknobs controlling an electric stop action. C. B. Fisk, Inc., uses the same technology on terraced keydesks divorced from the main case, using carbon-fiber trackers from the manuals, on current projects. Any concerts where the organist used the integrated keydesk this opus?
An interesting video, though it's a pity that it has to be so repetitive.
("Tell them what you're going to tell them ... tell them ... tell them what you've told them." - The cliche outline for a sermon.)
I wonder why Rosales' company did not build the organ, if he was considered to be suitable as the designer?
Offshoreorganbuilder Rosales has been doing much of his work in collaboration in recent years, especially for his larger projects. This began with the Fisk organ for Rice University in Houston. His first collaboration with Glatter-Goetz was Claremont United Church of Christ. Rosales has also collaborated with Dobson.
An exciting visual design. But "..you can't bend organ pipes"? Rubbish. Many organs have pipes that make bends (they are mitered) to help them fit into the space. This applies to both flues and reeds. If the organ we hear here is the actual organ, it sounds good for what is an instrument of relatively modest size for a modern concert instrument. But the marginal size limitation makes me wonder at versatility for the different demands of the organ repertoire.
There's a difference between bending (ie curving them, which is what I think they meant) and mitering them.
Those pipes look like an organ version of a bonfire.
The Casavant organ in KC's Helzberg Hall has the same kind of box of fries look. lol
the infamous "French Fries" organ
The name of this organ should be "Constance" (from the cartoon Monster House)
Try mahler no.2, no.8, Saint Saens no.3~~:)
The music that is in this video, what is the name of the organ piece?
Carpenter is the right organist for this organ.
How many times has Cameron Carpenter broken this instrument? Like he did the Kimmel Center in Philadelphia.
The big rumor is that the wood pipes were bent and haphazardly placed to look like Goofy built it.
I enjoyed this brief WDCH organ documentary.
That being said -- I'm still unsure about how I feel about the organ's *visual design.*
It is certainly a wonderful-sounding -- and beautifully crafted -- instrument, as well as an engineering marvel... but I'm still not "convinced" about the "tumbling-down forest" façade.
*Avant garde experimentalism* is fine, to a point. But, in most cases, there is a fine line between *intriguing cleverness* and *wanton absurdity (Dadaism).* Where does *unbridled Ego* end and the *creation of Beauty* begin?
A number of reknowned European organ-builders excel at creating very modern-looking organs -- but *none are so blatantly "visually inharmonious"* as the WDCH instrument.
Yet I still find it, though intellectually exciting, to be *uncomfortably distracting* in some deep "psychic/aesthetic" place.
Oh well, it's a done deal -- like it or not. Perhaps future years, and viewers, will pronounce the "final verdict."
Ask me how I feel about it a year from now....
Bob H: Well said. "Wanton absurdity" nails it perfectly. (ROFLMAO) That collection of pipes in the middle has given me a new disdain for Frank Gehry. The whole eyesore reminds me of cigarette butts sticking out of an ashtray.
Msrs Totota and Rosales, fortunately, seem to have managed to craft something that sounds pretty good, but thank God, Gehry didn't have much to say about the design of the console. 🌹
Looks like someone was playing Pixie Sticks with trees. Sounds great. Looks ridiculous.
🇺🇸🎼🎧🎼🇺🇸
why all this empty drivelling unti 1:29 ?
The organ is amazing. But I'm not a big fan of french style consoles.
PointyTailofSatan the idea was to provide a lower-profile console so as to provide better sight-lines for working with the conductor.
This thing was built in the late 20th Century using 15th centure technology. Diaphragm regulators. A tracker organ with an electric console and electric pulldown. SO much for tracker touch. What BS anyway. The real story behind this organ will likely never be heard. 2-1/2 years to do what any project would have taken 2 months. The organ has "Spunk" Why do the Violins, Piano and tubas have "Spunk" Yeah, Let's do it and it bankrupted Glatter-Gotz - along with a lot of financial crooked dealings. The fools who controlled the design had no skills in organ building. Let's see them gt Steinway give one of their pianos "Spunk" The builder IS the designer. What is it saying - It is a mockery of the dignity the majesty, the history of the pipe organ. Ahhh yes, Cameron has to bitch about the organ. How Did Edwin LaMere every play so well. You did a horribly expensive, needlessly complex, All thes epeople are busy patting themselves on the back. Opens to fanfare. All promotions by those who wish to promote themselves. Lookat Lincoln Center in New york. 20years later they tore out the organ and rebuilt the interior. All a big bust while the celebrities were congratualting themselves on designing a disaster. WHAT CRAP!!!
Your comments are CRAP....do you really know what your talking about?
Times have and are changing. This is the 21st century. a 15th century organ simply will not do. A modern organ must have 'spunk' they must have real breath and power, if its lazy, droning on, soft, bland...No one will listen. But If it can play anything from classical to modern music and beyond, it will certainly last. This is disney we're talking about.
@@Altenarian how about yaw make a improved design and sell your idea to disney
I see this phenomenon in a variety of forums, so when I see it I prepare myself for...in your words...CRAP.
The phenomemon is a long rambling paragraph dripping with hostility...and falsehoods.
Just so you know, hiding snippetts of falsehoods jammed in with multitudinous topics does not fool anyone.
robert shaw if by "15th century technology" you mean mechanical key action: I have played the Glatter-Gœtz/Rosales organ at Claremont United Church of Christ -- made a CD there, in fact (Raven label). The mechanical key action of that organ is one of the finest I have ever played anywhere, capable of extraordinary precision and nuance. So there's nothing archaic about it: it represents an absolutely up-to-the-minute technical and engineering sophistication. This organ should've taken two months to build?! You obviously know nothing about organ building!! Manuel Rosales is one of the finest organ builders in the world, especially in (but not limited to) the areas of tonal design and voicing. For you to be so dismissive of his work simply tells us that you lack any understanding. As to the dual consoles: I can imagine that Rosales' preference would have been for having only the mechanical console, but conductors often insist on having the second, movable console for ease in communication with the organist. The same was done by Klais for their organ at the Audimax at the Ruhruniversität in Bochum, Germany, which organ I once played (and both consoles work very well, each in its own way).
To me it is visual cacophony that distracts from the orchestra as a whole.
But the organ is not often played WITH an orchestra. It has to be able to function alone. This is a stupendous instrument.