..I don't believe the age of the universe,, But the man who figure out Big Bang as origin was the most intelligent person among all scientists, . CMB,, inflation, Planck theory, Cosmo- constant , multiverse, string theory,...,all these are merely a branches or modified version after the Big Bang ..😊
Well, ever since we recently discovered the 'axis of evil' in the CMB one must conclude the universe did originate around Earth (as per many religions), since we have the CMB's quadrupole and the octupole axis EXACLTY aligned with our solar system. Like wise the CMB dipole is EXACTLY aligned with the motion of our Milky inside the local group of galaxies. If our solar system or our Milky Way were not at the centre of the entire creation, then the CMB could NEVER have aligned with these very local features. So for anyone taking a religious stance; this would be your proof of our specialness. For anyone not involved in religion as a first explanation; the CMB dipole, octupole and quadroploe alignment with our local situation can only mean one thing: the CMB has NOTHING to do with the suggested birth of our universe. Rather the CMB is local effect caused by the (charged) nature of the fabric of our galactic plane. Our solar system motion inside such charged fabric would obviously then cause Compton radiation in the form of CMB radiation (explaining the quadrupole and octupole) as would the entire charged galaxy motion inside the the intergalactic ST conditions again cause such scattering on a galactic scale. So the discussion should really be; are we willing to become copernican religious (then we can maintain the CMB=cosmic birth myth) or do we keep being scientific (then we must change to CMB=intergalactic Compton radiation, or rather Galactic Microwave Background). Let's discuss with Lawrence Kraus ?
Well, ever since we discovered the 'axis of evil' in the CMB one must conclude the universe did originate around Earth (as per many religions), since we have the CMB's quadrupole and the octupole axis EXACLTY aligned with our solar system. Like wise the CMB dipole is EXACTLY aligned with the motion of our Milky inside the local group of galaxies. If our solar system or our Milky Way were not at the centre of the entire creation, then the CMB could NEVER have aligned with these very local features. So for anyone taking a religious stance; this would be your proof of our specialness. For anyone not involved in religion as a first explanation; the CMB dipole, octupole and quadroploe alignment with our local situation can only mean one thing: the CMB has NOTHING to do with the birth of our universe. Rather the CMB is local effect caused by the (charged) nature of the fabric of our galactic plane. Our solar system motion inside this charged fabric would cause the such CMB radiation (explaining the quadrupole and octupole) as would the entire charged galaxy motion inside the the intergalactic ST conditions again cause such scattering on a galactic scale. So the discussion should really be; are we willing to become copernican religious (then we can maintain the CMB=cosmic birth myth) or do we keep being scientific (then we must change to CMB=intergalactic Compton radiation). Guess we have a choice. Let's discuss with Lawrence Kraus ?
My pop Hugh Ross, so delightful seeing you! Having sincere conversations with our HOST Brian. Pop thank you for thy visitation to attend unto our own. Pop ye have been attending unto our own for a while. Thank you! Remembering who said if ye Love me! Yes, ye know Who? Love you too!
Well, ever since we discovered the 'axis of evil' in the CMB one must conclude the universe did originate around Earth (as per many religions), since we have the CMB's quadrupole and the octupole axis EXACLTY aligned with our solar system. Like wise the CMB dipole is EXACTLY aligned with the motion of our Milky inside the local group of galaxies. If our solar system or our Milky Way were not at the centre of the entire creation, then the CMB could NEVER have aligned with these very local features. So for anyone taking a religious stance; this would be your proof of our specialness. For anyone not involved in religion as a first explanation; the CMB dipole, octupole and quadroploe alignment with our local situation can only mean one thing: the CMB has NOTHING to do with the birth of our universe. Rather the CMB is local effect caused by the (charged) nature of the fabric of our galactic plane. Our solar system radiation and motion inside this charged fabric would cause such Compton scattering we now incorrectly call CMB, explaining the quadrupole and octupole. Likewise would the entire charged galaxy motion inside the intergalactic ST conditions again cause such scattering on an inter galactic scale in the local group, explaining the CMB dipole direction. Really very basic. So the discussion should really be; are we willing to become copernican religious (then we can maintain the CMB=cosmic birth myth) or do choose being scientific (then we must rebrand CMB to GMB Galactic Microwave Background) . Guess we have a choice. Let's discuss with Lawrence Kraus ?
Dr Keating, I have question about the First Stars - Currently the rate of creation of new stars are approximately 400,000,000a day. In the early universe the star creation must be on much biggest scale. I assume that in certain period the rate of new born stars and the rate of dying stars must be the same. The Standard Model explaining that the First Stars must be a Giant Stars which exploding as a Supernova and giving the material for the formation of the First galaxy which we are observing. My question is: In some period after the BB the rate of exploding as a Supernova Giant Primordial Stars must be at least at the rate of 4,800 per second! How is possible our telescopes not to see some extreme bright dazzling event?
First Stars were very massive, they would have had extremely short lifetimes, burning up their fuel quickly and dying within a few million years of forming
@@djsarg7451 Thank you very much, That explain a load....But the "Standard Model" predict that the "First Stars" are a "Giant Stars". The Standard Model postulate that the Giant Stars is not finishing as a Supernova, but directly collapsing into a Black Hole. The Standard Model is very likely to be correct... So...in this case, the Big Bang cannot produce a Physical Universe, but a Holographic one, because all the matter will ended into the Black Holes. Would be able please to explain me if the Universe is Holographic and is product of my mind, - Where my Mind is situated and who produced my mind, because My Mother and my Father also must be Holographic?
@@valentinmalinov8424 You wish to go to Si-Fie mode. Romans 1:20" For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God. Psalm 19 1-4: The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge. They have no speech, they use no words; no sound is heard from them. Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world.
@@valentinmalinov8424 The Universe is definitely physical and not "holographic". The hologram idea was just a mathematical trick to make the sums work out... 😋
As Dr.Keating mentioned, the cosmic radiation background is illuminated with microwaves. We use microwave oven to heat up food. If the universe (the cosmic background) is full of microwave, why are we (living organisms on earth) not "fully cooked" yet?
@@Omer_00.0 Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
I have discovered gravity is an expression of uncertainty. This is no joke. When entangled pair are measured and A’s spin emerges, a wormhole forms as a statement of uncertainty because B is out of causal contact with A. When the wormhole forms and A and B are made local, the as an expression of the resolution of uncertainty, then the wormhole disappears and Spin takes its place. When an object goes an across the cosmic horizon, it is encoded as gravity bits and the horizon grows by the number of Planck Areas that represent the quantum information that left the observable universe. But if that object returns across the relative cosmic horizon, then the gravity turns to quantum of information. The cosmic horizons curvature adds a 1.7% efficiency over flat so we can feel the effect from the cosmic horizon everywhere. This means when we measure the gravity by using Landauer limit at Hawking temperature input we will see the actual value of gravity from GR, except E Landauer needs to be multiplied by .724 to get the actual value of gravity. Gravity is equivalent to the energy in a constrained degree of spin freedom. And it’s used as a bit to express uncertainty. This is it. The solution.
@@MutsPub Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/yt
@@DrBrianKeating Two experts in the field, from different generations, discussing the origins of all matter, space, time, and energy with mutual respect. There is clearly far more that the two of you gentlemen agree upon than disagree on. Dr. Ross is more unyielding of his position. He has been exhaustively testing and searching for some 50 years with his model gaining strength. He has been brutally challenged by many and remained steadfast and successfully defended his position, in my opinion. You seem to be a bit more open to possibilities of change. I'll stick with the empirical evidence vs the theoretical. Even Dr. Hawking admitted that he needed fantasy math to make his model work. Dr. Krauss spent well over half of his book describing nine nothings, each of which were actually something, before he got to his point that the nothing before the beginning of the universe was not nothing; it was actually something. - yikes. That cost me many hours of my time that I wish I could get back. We simply do not have a formula to go from absolute nothing to something. Will this be the never ending problem causing the stubborn to stumble? T = 1 x 10-43 is close enough to t = zero for government work, to me. Especially when the mass of the universe would have only allowed a quantum gravitational effect equating to ~t = 1 x 10-100. The universe being some 13.8 Ga is a far cry from t = 1 x 10-100. For that matter, nor do we have a chemical mechanism for the first cell. Origin of Life researchers are no closer today than they were 70 years ago. In fact, they are actually farther away from the solution due to the radical increases in technologies. At this point, their findings in the lab are irrelevant to the conditions of a prebiotic Earth. Yet, we still want to argue. In the beginning, of the beginning (whenever that was), Elohim, Created; Hebrew "bara" - meaning He-Created (brought something into existence that never existed before), all physical reality of matter, space, time, and energy. Written some 3,500 years ago for all to see; our generation is the closest to an absolute zero in all human history. We've got it down to t = 1 x 10 -43. Yet, we still want to argue? Got to love it. Oh, God! George Burns circa 1977.
Infaltion solves some problems in cosmology and therefore became part of the standard model of established physics, without any evidence. Same like supersymmetry in particle physics. Predictions were made, nothing was found. Physics should go forward now not look backwards and hang on old ideas.
After reading about the BICEP experiments, does not the Faraday effect from earth's magnetic field spuriously rotate the plane of polarization and create noise in the CMB polarization data?
What I'm saying is, there may in fact be a boundary we haven't been able to see yet. Do to our technology conundrum. It may just be over the horizon. From the new images of the infrared telescope I would say there's a lot yet to be discovered. All the estimates may have come up short, but are sufficient to keep the sciences alive and well. Peace ✌️ 😎.
IMO , saying that the 'repository of all human wisdom and knowledge' is 'Wikipedia' ... is one of the reasons why Science/Scientists have taken such a hit to their credibility and believability over the last couple decades.
Wikipedia states that there is "No Theory of Everything in Physics". A few times I personally have informed Wikipedia for the existence of the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" (regardless of it is correct or not) This Theory exist, but Wikipedia is refusing to recognize the fact. It is not "Strange?"
Wikipedia is place to start it is never a place to end the debate. The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions. Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
@@djsarg7451 Thank you very much, you are very intelligent and knowledgeable person and I will need your help to understand one burning question - The "Standard Model" predict that the "First Stars" are a "Giant Stars". The Standard Model postulate that the Giant Stars is not finishing as a Supernova, but directly collapsing into a Black Hole. The Standard Model is very likely to be correct... So...in this case, the Big Bang cannot produce a Physical Universe, but a Holographic one, because all the matter will ended into the Black Holes. Would be able please to explain me if the Universe is Holographic and is product of my mind, - Where my Mind is situated and who produced my mind, because My Mother and my Father also must be Holographic?
It may be our own perception of size that's interfering with our ability to understand. We are at the bottom of the system inside a system inside a system etc. Peace ✌️😎. If the theory works locally why not use it, locally.
Not sure that is how AI works. The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions. Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions. Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
So, I want to talk about the big ear. When you say it was a plasma. This I believe a mistake. The transformation of gas to plasma I believe only occurs under a EMF. Full stop. Now the cmb, Brian. What is it? Remember I said that when blacksphere are born there is no bang more like a release of material. This is the sound we here in the ether, so to speak. It's the release of the first event background, Humm. The entire CMB might be a first star 🌟 in an infinite ♾️ space. As we know, stars only form under an EMF environment. That Humm may be the Humm of a really big EMFSYSTEMS, full stop. Inside an infinite ♾️ space environment. We may have the whole picture incorrectly respectfully. GR. Is a theory of what we see or an imagined way of perceiving what we see 👀. A description say. Now we're getting to the heart of the Matter. I think 🤔 we are very close. Peace ✌️ 😎.
The disciples looking at the crowd. For many hungers. Disciples said, TEACHER send them away so can find their own food to eat! Yeshua Jesus Christ said, do not send them away! Shared "i" Am come forth! The disciples said, TEACHER here's a little Lad with a basket of bread and a fish! Yeshua Jesus came and took the basket from the little Lad and lifted up and blessed! As HE is lifted up! Will draws all men unto HIM!
The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions. Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
Nice story, but as you presented it is not much better than in the bible which was took from sumerian stories just for political reasons, and the genesis written by Moses working for the Egyptian political power. I know what it is called as evidence, I'm a phycisist, I doubt about INFLATION model, I know the arguments for it, it is not enough for me, theoriticians are always able to find some trick to save a situation with an uncomfortable evidence. We should pay attention to another views, from my point of view you are fooling yourself, taking this from feynman. TAKE A LOOK of the channel of prof. UNZICKER, all the series of variable speed of light, or the papers by prof C.S. Unnikrishnan in arXiv, or his book published by Springer about a cosmic relativity model etc. Why the cosmology community act like a religious cofrady? Yes this is the way I see it when I reed some peer reviews, but of course I understand this is the way of the antropo, specifically the homo sapiens. Good luck with that and take care.
Here is were it is from: 1 Thessalonians 5:21" Test all things; hold fast what is good." We are to not belive someones word. We are to check it out. Testable creation models are a good thing. But, it must be a two-way street. If science points to a transcendent Creator, science should agree. If Science points to an error in Bible teaching, then maybe the Bible interpretation is wrong. If science points to a fine-tuned universe, then there is a Causal Agent beyond space and time that created our universe of matter, energy, space, and time. Testable Creation Model The frame of reference in Genesis 1:1 is the cosmos, all of physical reality. God declares that he brought into existence the entire universe-matter, energy, and all the associated space-time dimensions. Einstein’s theory of general relativity tells us that the cause of the universe acts independently (i.e., from outside) of matter, energy, and the space-time dimensions along which matter and energy are distributed to bring it into existence. Observations now securely establish the reliability of general relativity. Genesis 1:2 explicitly shifts the frame of reference, the narrator’s vantage point, to the surface of Earth, above the waters but below the clouds. This verse describes the initial conditions of primordial Earth: dark on its surface, covered with water, empty of life, and unfit for life. With the frame of reference and the initial conditions for the six creation days thus established, a straightforward chronology of creation events unfolds: Planet Earth is singled out for a sequence of divine interventions. At its beginning, Earth is empty of life and unfit for life, and light cannot penetrate its thick atmosphere. As interplanetary debris cleared and early life began to transform Earth’s atmosphere, light from the heavenly bodies could penetrate to the surface. As water vapor formed in the troposphere, a stable water cycle formed. Continental landmasses arose and ocean basins took shape. Plants began to grow on the continental landmasses. The atmosphere transitioned from translucent to occasionally transparent so that the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars could be seen from the vantage point of Earth’s surface. Swarms of small sea animals filled the oceans. Sea mammals and birds were created and became abundant. Three specialized kinds of animals came onto the scene: short-legged land mammals, long-legged, easy-to-tame land mammals, and long-legged, difficult-to-tame land mammals-all three appropriate in specific ways to help meet humanity’s needs. Human beings appeared. Science works with testable ideas called Models. To see if an idea(s) is correct one makes expectations about future Science findings and discoveries.
Students will say, our shared clay feet mixed with iron resting upon all dry grounds. Grounded! Resting upon. Loving God of the Living, loving our neighbors, and remember do not forbid these little ones to come forth unto Me!
Students will say our names exist in front of HIM! And given ABLE! To pull down nor to fine tune scattered noises from all shared mouths in front of HIM!
Is the Big Bang model compatible with religious concepts? And take your chance to win a meteorite: briankeating.com/x
Possibly but not probably.
..I don't believe the age of the universe,, But the man who figure out Big Bang as origin was the most intelligent person among all scientists, .
CMB,, inflation, Planck theory, Cosmo- constant , multiverse, string theory,...,all these are merely a branches or modified version after the Big Bang ..😊
Cold freezing ice NO.
Well, ever since we recently discovered the 'axis of evil' in the CMB one must conclude the universe did originate around Earth (as per many religions), since we have the CMB's quadrupole and the octupole axis EXACLTY aligned with our solar system. Like wise the CMB dipole is EXACTLY aligned with the motion of our Milky inside the local group of galaxies. If our solar system or our Milky Way were not at the centre of the entire creation, then the CMB could NEVER have aligned with these very local features. So for anyone taking a religious stance; this would be your proof of our specialness. For anyone not involved in religion as a first explanation; the CMB dipole, octupole and quadroploe alignment with our local situation can only mean one thing: the CMB has NOTHING to do with the suggested birth of our universe. Rather the CMB is local effect caused by the (charged) nature of the fabric of our galactic plane. Our solar system motion inside such charged fabric would obviously then cause Compton radiation in the form of CMB radiation (explaining the quadrupole and octupole) as would the entire charged galaxy motion inside the the intergalactic ST conditions again cause such scattering on a galactic scale. So the discussion should really be; are we willing to become copernican religious (then we can maintain the CMB=cosmic birth myth) or do we keep being scientific (then we must change to CMB=intergalactic Compton radiation, or rather Galactic Microwave Background). Let's discuss with Lawrence Kraus ?
Well, ever since we discovered the 'axis of evil' in the CMB one must conclude the universe did originate around Earth (as per many religions), since we have the CMB's quadrupole and the octupole axis EXACLTY aligned with our solar system. Like wise the CMB dipole is EXACTLY aligned with the motion of our Milky inside the local group of galaxies. If our solar system or our Milky Way were not at the centre of the entire creation, then the CMB could NEVER have aligned with these very local features. So for anyone taking a religious stance; this would be your proof of our specialness. For anyone not involved in religion as a first explanation; the CMB dipole, octupole and quadroploe alignment with our local situation can only mean one thing: the CMB has NOTHING to do with the birth of our universe. Rather the CMB is local effect caused by the (charged) nature of the fabric of our galactic plane. Our solar system motion inside this charged fabric would cause the such CMB radiation (explaining the quadrupole and octupole) as would the entire charged galaxy motion inside the the intergalactic ST conditions again cause such scattering on a galactic scale. So the discussion should really be; are we willing to become copernican religious (then we can maintain the CMB=cosmic birth myth) or do we keep being scientific (then we must change to CMB=intergalactic Compton radiation). Guess we have a choice. Let's discuss with Lawrence Kraus ?
My pop Hugh Ross, so delightful seeing you! Having sincere conversations with our HOST Brian. Pop thank you for thy visitation to attend unto our own. Pop ye have been attending unto our own for a while. Thank you! Remembering who said if ye Love me! Yes, ye know Who? Love you too!
Great talk all, the best.
上一篇寫母宇宙中的能量凝結成能質粒子，再以能階差使粒子間結合成無動能、無距離與密度無限大的粒子個體，也就是黑洞的最小單位，粒子個體間也以能階差形成了相對運動，最後以踫撞融合長大結束，在融合時動能轉化為熱能提升合體後的能階，所以黑洞越大其體內的能階越高，當黑洞體內的能階超過內聚力就會自爆，所以黑洞的體積是有極限（估計有銀河系的大小，引力達50億光年），而自爆所釋放出來的能量也差異不大，所以在母宇宙他處以黑洞自爆產生的子宇宙，其演化過程與本宇宙相類似。
大霹靂發生前的宇宙最大黑洞周圍有最密集的黑洞系統繞其運行，當發生大霹靂時失去了引力源的黑洞系統就會以切線方向離心速度飛離中心點，而能質粒子與大霹靂的高溫以質能轉換產生了電磁輻射（宇宙背景輻射）、光粒子、原始粒子（基本粒子與量子）與暗物質（能質粒子提升能階而得，所以佔物質總量90%是合理的），其後以赤熱原始粒子在擴張時與能質粒子經幾回冷熱交替形成了原始粒子濃湯。
在大霹靂發生時原先較靠近中心的黑洞系統雖以離心速度飛離中心點，但是與原始粒子的速度相比是不值一提的，在短時間內就被高能量與原始粒子給包覆住，於是這些黑洞系統同樣是以能階差截取原始粒子與能量在身上，這些能量是本宇宙中的最高能量，較小的黑洞也會逐層剝落提升能階後形成了暗物質，存留下來的都是大質量的黑洞與其黑洞系統，所以現在觀測到的類星體與大質量恒星系統就是這樣形成的。
大霹靂後的原始粒子濃湯要在10億年後才有足夠的濃度讓穿過的黑洞系統成員所攜帶的能形成物質星球，而過了20億年後的原始粒子濃湯則因能量的衰減與體積的膨漲導致密度下降，使穿過的黑洞系統成員所截取的原始粒子濃湯無法達成物質星球的基本條件，所以滿天星斗中有機會形成物質星球的機率不到10%，而前述有說明本宇宙是佔母宇宙的一小部分空間，本宇宙在擴張是離心力造成的，而母宇宙中的黑洞對飛馳的星系團是引力作用，不會有相斥現象發生，所以本宇宙會一直往母宇宙深處飛行，直到物質裂解成能量回饋給母宇宙，成為能質粒子的養分。
而現在觀測到的本宇宙邊緣的百億光年的能量結構體，其實就是原始粒子濃湯的現今位置，因母子宇宙交界處的能階差很大，使原始粒子濃湯的速度因而遲緩，這與星系團最外圍因溫度差異而形成推進緩慢而形成了高能量粒子的密度增加，使有明亮的光暈存在，而宇宙邊緣的能量結構體可視之為本宇宙球體的小部分弧度，在多觀查得到更多資料就可以反推大霹靂的中心點。
Great program and highly educational. Love experimental physics!
Well, ever since we discovered the 'axis of evil' in the CMB one must conclude the universe did originate around Earth (as per many religions), since we have the CMB's quadrupole and the octupole axis EXACLTY aligned with our solar system. Like wise the CMB dipole is EXACTLY aligned with the motion of our Milky inside the local group of galaxies. If our solar system or our Milky Way were not at the centre of the entire creation, then the CMB could NEVER have aligned with these very local features. So for anyone taking a religious stance; this would be your proof of our specialness. For anyone not involved in religion as a first explanation; the CMB dipole, octupole and quadroploe alignment with our local situation can only mean one thing: the CMB has NOTHING to do with the birth of our universe. Rather the CMB is local effect caused by the (charged) nature of the fabric of our galactic plane. Our solar system radiation and motion inside this charged fabric would cause such Compton scattering we now incorrectly call CMB, explaining the quadrupole and octupole. Likewise would the entire charged galaxy motion inside the intergalactic ST conditions again cause such scattering on an inter galactic scale in the local group, explaining the CMB dipole direction. Really very basic. So the discussion should really be; are we willing to become copernican religious (then we can maintain the CMB=cosmic birth myth) or do choose being scientific (then we must rebrand CMB to GMB Galactic Microwave Background) . Guess we have a choice. Let's discuss with Lawrence Kraus ?
Thank you, Pop Hugh and my Host Brian.
this was just fascinating - and made fairly easily understandable for us - thank you both 🎉
Whay a lovely soul Hugh has
Dr Keating, I have question about the First Stars - Currently the rate of creation of new stars are approximately 400,000,000a day. In the early universe the star creation must be on much biggest scale. I assume that in certain period the rate of new born stars and the rate of dying stars must be the same. The Standard Model explaining that the First Stars must be a Giant Stars which exploding as a Supernova and giving the material for the formation of the First galaxy which we are observing. My question is: In some period after the BB the rate of exploding as a Supernova Giant Primordial Stars must be at least at the rate of 4,800 per second! How is possible our telescopes not to see some extreme bright dazzling event?
First Stars were very massive, they would have had extremely short lifetimes, burning up their fuel quickly and dying within a few million years of forming
@@djsarg7451 Thank you very much, That explain a load....But the "Standard Model" predict that the "First Stars" are a "Giant Stars". The Standard Model postulate that the Giant Stars is not finishing as a Supernova, but directly collapsing into a Black Hole. The Standard Model is very likely to be correct... So...in this case, the Big Bang cannot produce a Physical Universe, but a Holographic one, because all the matter will ended into the Black Holes. Would be able please to explain me if the Universe is Holographic and is product of my mind, - Where my Mind is situated and who produced my mind, because My Mother and my Father also must be Holographic?
@@valentinmalinov8424 You wish to go to Si-Fie mode.
Romans 1:20" For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God.
Psalm 19 1-4: The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge. They have no speech, they use no words; no sound is heard from them. Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world.
@@valentinmalinov8424 The Universe is definitely physical and not "holographic". The hologram idea was just a mathematical trick to make the sums work out... 😋
Sustained. No one can pluck away nor shaken but here to stay for good. Why?
As Dr.Keating mentioned, the cosmic radiation background is illuminated with microwaves. We use microwave oven to heat up food.
If the universe (the cosmic background) is full of microwave, why are we (living organisms on earth) not "fully cooked" yet?
That was very informative, thank you so much
Greater than is this way less than is this way
@@Omer_00.0 Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
Amazing!!! Thank you so much.
my pleasure ! make sure you're signed up for my mailing list briankeating.com/x
I have discovered gravity is an expression of uncertainty. This is no joke. When entangled pair are measured and A’s spin emerges, a wormhole forms as a statement of uncertainty because B is out of causal contact with A. When the wormhole forms and A and B are made local, the as an expression of the resolution of uncertainty, then the wormhole disappears and Spin takes its place.
When an object goes an across the cosmic horizon, it is encoded as gravity bits and the horizon grows by the number of Planck Areas that represent the quantum information that left the observable universe. But if that object returns across the relative cosmic horizon, then the gravity turns to quantum of information. The cosmic horizons curvature adds a 1.7% efficiency over flat so we can feel the effect from the cosmic horizon everywhere. This means when we measure the gravity by using Landauer limit at Hawking temperature input we will see the actual value of gravity from GR, except E Landauer needs to be multiplied by .724 to get the actual value of gravity. Gravity is equivalent to the energy in a constrained degree of spin freedom. And it’s used as a bit to express uncertainty. This is it. The solution.
Thank you.
@@MutsPub Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/yt
@@DrBrianKeating Two experts in the field, from different generations, discussing the origins of all matter, space, time, and energy with mutual respect. There is clearly far more that the two of you gentlemen agree upon than disagree on.
Dr. Ross is more unyielding of his position. He has been exhaustively testing and searching for some 50 years with his model gaining strength. He has been brutally challenged by many and remained steadfast and successfully defended his position, in my opinion.
You seem to be a bit more open to possibilities of change.
I'll stick with the empirical evidence vs the theoretical. Even Dr. Hawking admitted that he needed fantasy math to make his model work.
Dr. Krauss spent well over half of his book describing nine nothings, each of which were actually something, before he got to his point that the nothing before the beginning of the universe was not nothing; it was actually something. - yikes.
That cost me many hours of my time that I wish I could get back.
We simply do not have a formula to go from absolute nothing to something.
Will this be the never ending problem causing the stubborn to stumble?
T = 1 x 10-43 is close enough to t = zero for government work, to me.
Especially when the mass of the universe would have only allowed a quantum gravitational effect equating to ~t = 1 x 10-100.
The universe being some 13.8 Ga is a far cry from t = 1 x 10-100.
For that matter, nor do we have a chemical mechanism for the first cell. Origin of Life researchers are no closer today than they were 70 years ago. In fact, they are actually farther away from the solution due to the radical increases in technologies. At this point, their findings in the lab are irrelevant to the conditions of a prebiotic Earth.
Yet, we still want to argue.
In the beginning, of the beginning (whenever that was), Elohim, Created; Hebrew "bara" - meaning He-Created (brought something into existence that never existed before), all physical reality of matter, space, time, and energy.
Written some 3,500 years ago for all to see; our generation is the closest to an absolute zero in all human history.
We've got it down to t = 1 x 10 -43.
Yet, we still want to argue?
Got to love it.
Oh, God!
George Burns circa 1977.
Nothing is Imposible!!!
And then the great attractors start to make sense.
Infaltion solves some problems in cosmology and therefore became part of the standard model of established physics, without any evidence. Same like supersymmetry in particle physics. Predictions were made, nothing was found. Physics should go forward now not look backwards and hang on old ideas.
After reading about the BICEP experiments, does not the Faraday effect from earth's magnetic field spuriously rotate the plane of polarization and create noise in the CMB polarization data?
What I'm saying is, there may in fact be a boundary we haven't been able to see yet. Do to our technology conundrum. It may just be over the horizon. From the new images of the infrared telescope I would say there's a lot yet to be discovered. All the estimates may have come up short, but are sufficient to keep the sciences alive and well. Peace ✌️ 😎.
IMO , saying that the 'repository of all human wisdom and knowledge' is 'Wikipedia' ... is one of the reasons why Science/Scientists have taken such a hit to their credibility and believability over the last couple decades.
@@mojozowa I know. It’s a joke
Wikipedia states that there is "No Theory of Everything in Physics". A few times I personally have informed Wikipedia for the existence of the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" (regardless of it is correct or not) This Theory exist, but Wikipedia is refusing to recognize the fact. It is not "Strange?"
Wikipedia is place to start it is never a place to end the debate.
The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions.
Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
@@djsarg7451 Thank you very much, you are very intelligent and knowledgeable person and I will need your help to understand one burning question - The "Standard Model" predict that the "First Stars" are a "Giant Stars". The Standard Model postulate that the Giant Stars is not finishing as a Supernova, but directly collapsing into a Black Hole. The Standard Model is very likely to be correct... So...in this case, the Big Bang cannot produce a Physical Universe, but a Holographic one, because all the matter will ended into the Black Holes. Would be able please to explain me if the Universe is Holographic and is product of my mind, - Where my Mind is situated and who produced my mind, because My Mother and my Father also must be Holographic?
woosh/yr head - i mean clearly that was a joke 😂
It may be our own perception of size that's interfering with our ability to understand. We are at the bottom of the system inside a system inside a system etc. Peace ✌️😎. If the theory works locally why not use it, locally.
For many shared mouths rather not say TRUTH!
Many wise and Scribes of this world will say, why HIS shared "i" Am students are not being consumed?
Students shared "i" Am will say, remember YES or NO! Outside of these....fill in the blank!
You can sense the organizational skill difference between the younger and older generations. Easier to understand the older generations.
33:06 - **SCREAMING GIRL SOUNDS**
AI should be able to narrow down to a very precise degree the most probable origin of the universe.
Not sure that is how AI works.
The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions.
Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
we only have machine learning not true AI, but it will help crunch data.
Something coming from nothing makes no sense to me. In physics, what is nothing? Good interview.
The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions.
Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
❤
20:59 virtual particle membrain with corporial rendered multi-domain gravitational signatures as space time contingencies
So, I want to talk about the big ear. When you say it was a plasma. This I believe a mistake. The transformation of gas to plasma I believe only occurs under a EMF. Full stop. Now the cmb, Brian. What is it? Remember I said that when blacksphere are born there is no bang more like a release of material. This is the sound we here in the ether, so to speak. It's the release of the first event background, Humm. The entire CMB might be a first star 🌟 in an infinite ♾️ space. As we know, stars only form under an EMF environment. That Humm may be the Humm of a really big EMFSYSTEMS, full stop. Inside an infinite ♾️ space environment. We may have the whole picture incorrectly respectfully. GR. Is a theory of what we see or an imagined way of perceiving what we see 👀. A description say. Now we're getting to the heart of the Matter. I think 🤔 we are very close. Peace ✌️ 😎.
hi
The disciples looking at the crowd. For many hungers. Disciples said, TEACHER send them away so can find their own food to eat! Yeshua Jesus Christ said, do not send them away! Shared "i" Am come forth! The disciples said, TEACHER here's a little Lad with a basket of bread and a fish! Yeshua Jesus came and took the basket from the little Lad and lifted up and blessed! As HE is lifted up! Will draws all men unto HIM!
Reasons for pseudoscience?
The Big Bang describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature from nothing. The theory of general relativity: the universe began at a “singularity” (Big Bang) where all matter, energy, space, and time came into existence at an infinitely small point and expanded outward from there. Space-time Theorems recognizes the union of space and time. General relativity has been proven to be true. The universe has mass, and the universe is expanding. Thus the universe had a singularity/Big Bang/beginning from extra dimensions.
Biblical Hebrew has a smaller vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time in the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago.
Nice story, but as you presented it is not much better than in the bible which was took from sumerian stories just for political reasons, and the genesis written by Moses working for the Egyptian political power. I know what it is called as evidence, I'm a phycisist, I doubt about INFLATION model, I know the arguments for it, it is not enough for me, theoriticians are always able to find some trick to save a situation with an uncomfortable evidence. We should pay attention to another views, from my point of view you are fooling yourself, taking this from feynman. TAKE A LOOK of the channel of prof. UNZICKER, all the series of variable speed of light, or the papers by prof C.S. Unnikrishnan in arXiv, or his book published by Springer about a cosmic relativity model etc. Why the cosmology community act like a religious cofrady? Yes this is the way I see it when I reed some peer reviews, but of course I understand this is the way of the antropo, specifically the homo sapiens. Good luck with that and take care.
279k
Nice
@@MS-od7je Thanks
What is falsified? Falsified, come here in front and remind! Lord thy "i" Am. Lord, who can falsify?
Here is were it is from:
1 Thessalonians 5:21" Test all things; hold fast what is good."
We are to not belive someones word. We are to check it out.
Testable creation models are a good thing. But, it must be a two-way street. If science points to a transcendent Creator, science should agree. If Science points to an error in Bible teaching, then maybe the Bible interpretation is wrong. If science points to a fine-tuned universe, then there is a Causal Agent beyond space and time that created our universe of matter, energy, space, and time.
Testable Creation Model
The frame of reference in Genesis 1:1 is the cosmos, all of physical reality. God declares that he brought into existence the entire universe-matter, energy, and all the associated space-time dimensions. Einstein’s theory of general relativity tells us that the cause of the universe acts independently (i.e., from outside) of matter, energy, and the space-time dimensions along which matter and energy are distributed to bring it into existence. Observations now securely establish the reliability of general relativity.
Genesis 1:2 explicitly shifts the frame of reference, the narrator’s vantage point, to the surface of Earth, above the waters but below the clouds. This verse describes the initial conditions of primordial Earth: dark on its surface, covered with water, empty of life, and unfit for life. With the frame of reference and the initial conditions for the six creation days thus established, a straightforward chronology of creation events unfolds:
Planet Earth is singled out for a sequence of divine interventions. At its beginning, Earth is empty of life and unfit for life, and light cannot penetrate its thick atmosphere.
As interplanetary debris cleared and early life began to transform Earth’s atmosphere, light from the heavenly bodies could penetrate to the surface.
As water vapor formed in the troposphere, a stable water cycle formed.
Continental landmasses arose and ocean basins took shape.
Plants began to grow on the continental landmasses.
The atmosphere transitioned from translucent to occasionally transparent so that the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars could be seen from the vantage point of Earth’s surface.
Swarms of small sea animals filled the oceans.
Sea mammals and birds were created and became abundant.
Three specialized kinds of animals came onto the scene: short-legged land mammals, long-legged, easy-to-tame land mammals, and long-legged, difficult-to-tame land mammals-all three appropriate in specific ways to help meet humanity’s needs.
Human beings appeared.
Science works with testable ideas called Models. To see if an idea(s) is correct one makes expectations about future Science findings and discoveries.
hahahahaha
Students will say, our shared clay feet mixed with iron resting upon all dry grounds. Grounded! Resting upon. Loving God of the Living, loving our neighbors, and remember do not forbid these little ones to come forth unto Me!
Students will say our names exist in front of HIM! And given ABLE! To pull down nor to fine tune scattered noises from all shared mouths in front of HIM!
Why students? Lord will be investigated! Indeed
Students will say, from the Evil one.
Now, Falsified, come here in front and remind! Who ye will say, who "i" Am. Lord TRUTH.