From my experience, Claude 3.5 has more recent data that I need from the ai model. For example when I am asking about svelte 5 new runes features and to review such code - Chat gpt completely fails to deliver quality code and whats worse, doesnt even admit it cant help me and instead provides me with bad code full of errors. On the other side code from claude works magically on the first try most of the time.
@@agentofenhanced2428 for me i dont have an issue can be coding for a long time with it once i was dealing with a big project all i did was ask it to produce first half of the code then the secound and if its like really really long then i would ask it to cut it into 3-4 chats so i would not hit token limit or run down my times quickly
Do you know why after 7 or 8 prompts the daily limit of 1mio tokens is reached? This really sucks in claude, it's not possible to really code something
@@kerkertrandov459Even the paid version has terrible limits. I can make a chat go on for weeks on chatgpt whereas on Claude it's probably just 20 messages.
That's not the issue. It has the capability to do the task in one prompt assuming your objective was clear, and certainly two prompts if clarification is required. BUT IT WILL PURPOSELY NOT PROVIDE THE SOLUTION BECAUSE IT IS ALLIGNED TO MAXIMIZE PROMPTS.
For me personally who used both paid chatgpt and claude. I prefer ChatGPT cause it gives me more worth of my bucks. In Claude I really hate their pdf restriction and csv restriction. Cause whats the point of adding the data analysis feature and visual pdf when you cant even upload it. Also their 40 prompt contraint really pains me alot. The onlt feature i loved was their project feaature whoch I really like cause it understands the file way better than ChatGPT. I would prefer to use its API for flexibility next time
Claude can use up it's maximum tokens unless you really become efficient with it. Using something like cursor ai you can enable the five minute cache on it you help save on retrieval token use. Plus try to pack as many direct queries into it as possible per prompt. The Claude AI Reddit has actual good references on how to get the bang for your buck.
Yeah, I agree. I get locked out of Sonnet real quick and can't upload Excel files. That said, sometimes it reads and extracts PDF data better than ChatGPT.
@robind_001 They sent me a email after I complain saying there GUI is not for extensive use. It is over hyped crap that has no commercial value whatsoever. Gemini also
Hello, I am a university student of ING.Informática, I am from the country of Bolivia. Can you help me by knowing which AI is better to access the premium version, Claude or ChatGPT. in Development and code issues, both in quality, price or quantity. I need it to develop software and I do not have enough money to pay for 2 Pro versions.
Just found your channel and I'm impressed by how much content you packed into this video. Please make more quick "how to get started" type videos like this. And also going deeper :)
Indeed. My printed code was shit until I brushed up on my coding skills. I work in finance with a trade hedge fund company and Claude AI has been such a boon after I brushed up on my Java and pinescript.
No. Python helps you solve complex text/data processing problems in fewer lines of code and these tools are helpful assistants since Python is quite vast in the number of domains it can be used in and libraries available.
Practically i use chatgpt when i need to generate documentations or draft a reply , in short for writing good content ,claude however is purely technical tool, its not very creative, however claude leads in programming based tasks, it created better diagrams better svg's, i think anthopic is making claude more and more optimized for programmer , developer community...
Both Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini have their pros and cons. At the moment they complement each other in my opinion. While Claude can be really good at writing code, it does at times write overly complicated code by adding unnecessary lines of code that you didn't ask for. ChatGPT then can offer a simpler solution with fewer unnecessary lines of code. That's one option. Another option is to specifically ask Claude to write the code in a simpler way without unnecessary lines of code that you didn't ask for.
I personally think these kind of channels are being viewed by people like me, people with no formal education. There is a lot of hype around AI, but it seems there are fallacies at play. The idea is that these videos are meant to attract just about anyone to tune in and hopefully catch up but there is a lot of missing context. If you've ever been neglected as a student and you've had the experience of seeing how the teacher has a preference for the ones who already get it, you would understand. So the question is, can these videos really be effective at teaching or are they just a showcase for people who already know? Cause it seems all of you speedrun through the process like it was a videogame, you might have to encourage people to initiate rather than force through it
sonnet 3.5 and sonnet "new" are really good at coding, they understand well. new can even design and understands your intent very well, but sometimes it may lose the context or try to redesign or reimplement sth you already did.
@@Island_Algorithms no, with MT4 it's keeps entering in fixing bugs , fixing 5 errors and creating 8 news ones...forgetting pieces of the source code.I had much better and stable results with GPT 01-Preview but it is limited to something like 25 questions max, then blocks you for a week...
@@intercoldebtcollectionagency I use claude and love it. Im guessing why gpt 01 is better for much more complex code as its able to look over it again and correct it self like a human does while claude doesn't have the ability to do so
Claude's generations are very good, but the lazy generations are quite annoying, and the longer the context, the worse it gets. Additionly, when using the web chat service (Claude Pro), the limits are too low, causing a project to be cut off in mid-flow is enraging. Both are unacceptable for any serious work.
jeez, slow down, take a breath every few sentences. It's like listening to a hyper small dog. Yes, I get it, you can edit tight.. but, checked out after 1 minute of it - it's a wall of talking.
From my experience, Claude 3.5 has more recent data that I need from the ai model. For example when I am asking about svelte 5 new runes features and to review such code - Chat gpt completely fails to deliver quality code and whats worse, doesnt even admit it cant help me and instead provides me with bad code full of errors. On the other side code from claude works magically on the first try most of the time.
Have you tried 01-preview with chatgpt? Just wondering what you think the difference is like if you have.
Yeah but the limit on claude is just horrible you run out of limit very fast
@@gregoriusmikestill doesn't read through the latest docs
@@rubyciide5542 gpt or claude?
@@agentofenhanced2428 for me i dont have an issue can be coding for a long time with it once i was dealing with a big project all i did was ask it to produce first half of the code then the secound and if its like really really long then i would ask it to cut it into 3-4 chats so i would not hit token limit or run down my times quickly
enterprise-ai AI fixes this (Code complete projects in PHP or Python). Programmers switch to Claude 3.5.
Do you know why after 7 or 8 prompts the daily limit of 1mio tokens is reached? This really sucks in claude, it's not possible to really code something
Buy paid version then
@@kerkertrandov459Even the paid version has terrible limits. I can make a chat go on for weeks on chatgpt whereas on Claude it's probably just 20 messages.
That's not the issue. It has the capability to do the task in one prompt assuming your objective was clear, and certainly two prompts if clarification is required. BUT IT WILL PURPOSELY NOT PROVIDE THE SOLUTION BECAUSE IT IS ALLIGNED TO MAXIMIZE PROMPTS.
@@valeriek8077 maybe it only does that on the free version to incentivize u to pay which is fair enough as if u dont pay they dont owe u anything
For me personally who used both paid chatgpt and claude. I prefer ChatGPT cause it gives me more worth of my bucks. In Claude I really hate their pdf restriction and csv restriction. Cause whats the point of adding the data analysis feature and visual pdf when you cant even upload it. Also their 40 prompt contraint really pains me alot. The onlt feature i loved was their project feaature whoch I really like cause it understands the file way better than ChatGPT. I would prefer to use its API for flexibility next time
O1 bigger better than Claude
Custom instructions for Claude is not as limited as chatgpt. that's also a big positive
@@MeTuMaTHiCa o1 is limited at 50 messages a week lol. And it's not even that much better, and takes 1mn+ to answer
Claude can use up it's maximum tokens unless you really become efficient with it. Using something like cursor ai you can enable the five minute cache on it you help save on retrieval token use. Plus try to pack as many direct queries into it as possible per prompt. The Claude AI Reddit has actual good references on how to get the bang for your buck.
@@douglasdyer366 u say : when dealing Claude u must act like prompt ai
Dude, Claud came up with the canvas feature before ChatGPT copied it :D
Clickbait title
No it’s not
Lmao
Claude is ridiculously expensive and the rate limiting will destroy your project. There, I said it for you.
Agree with you
What is the rate limit for claude ?
Yeah, I agree. I get locked out of Sonnet real quick and can't upload Excel files. That said, sometimes it reads and extracts PDF data better than ChatGPT.
@robind_001 They sent me a email after I complain saying there GUI is not for extensive use. It is over hyped crap that has no commercial value whatsoever. Gemini also
It's so worth paying for projects is where it's really at.
can we have some youtube videos that do more than html, css and javascript ?
Hello, I am a university student of ING.Informática, I am from the country of Bolivia. Can you help me by knowing which AI is better to access the premium version, Claude or ChatGPT. in Development and code issues, both in quality, price or quantity. I need it to develop software and I do not have enough money to pay for 2 Pro versions.
Yo he usado los dos para codigo, y creo que el que tienen mejores resultados y respuestas mas precisas la tiene Claude AI.
Just found your channel and I'm impressed by how much content you packed into this video. Please make more quick "how to get started" type videos like this. And also going deeper :)
tbh I always used Claude only for programming, I just like their Ui
Very clean interface. I stopped using ChatGPT because Claude has very low hallucination and high accuracy.
@ exactly,i don’t understand why these $billion OpenAI suck at UI
so i am quitting to learn python or programming languages ? what a bad time to learn code
Don't give up. People with solid coding knowledge use these tools best.
@@tomascaetano4270 actually I just study a literature career and im making a plugin for wordpress just with claude 😮
Indeed. My printed code was shit until I brushed up on my coding skills. I work in finance with a trade hedge fund company and Claude AI has been such a boon after I brushed up on my Java and pinescript.
No. Python helps you solve complex text/data processing problems in fewer lines of code and these tools are helpful assistants since Python is quite vast in the number of domains it can be used in and libraries available.
Practically i use chatgpt when i need to generate documentations or draft a reply , in short for writing good content ,claude however is purely technical tool, its not very creative, however claude leads in programming based tasks, it created better diagrams better svg's, i think anthopic is making claude more and more optimized for programmer , developer community...
Both Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini have their pros and cons. At the moment they complement each other in my opinion.
While Claude can be really good at writing code, it does at times write overly complicated code by adding unnecessary lines of code that you didn't ask for. ChatGPT then can offer a simpler solution with fewer unnecessary lines of code. That's one option.
Another option is to specifically ask Claude to write the code in a simpler way without unnecessary lines of code that you didn't ask for.
Can you please make a free course on AI for developers.
It's in the works!
I personally think these kind of channels are being viewed by people like me, people with no formal education. There is a lot of hype around AI, but it seems there are fallacies at play. The idea is that these videos are meant to attract just about anyone to tune in and hopefully catch up but there is a lot of missing context. If you've ever been neglected as a student and you've had the experience of seeing how the teacher has a preference for the ones who already get it, you would understand. So the question is, can these videos really be effective at teaching or are they just a showcase for people who already know? Cause it seems all of you speedrun through the process like it was a videogame, you might have to encourage people to initiate rather than force through it
Thanks for the video❤@@CodexCommunity
@omorfarukmahfuj please clean my house for free 🙄
what did they do to chatgpt? it sucks now
sonnet 3.5 and sonnet "new" are really good at coding, they understand well. new can even design and understands your intent very well, but sometimes it may lose the context or try to redesign or reimplement sth you already did.
True
I use claude to replicate flappy bird using vite+reactjs and damn, Claude really did it well than chatgpt, even o1 cant beat sonnet 3.5
Woah, this is cool!
Tried both for MT4 Metatrader EA coding...they are both "useless"as you will end-up in infinite but fixing loops :(
I find Claude excellent at MQL5 coding. Maybe its the prompting?
@@Island_Algorithms no, with MT4 it's keeps entering in fixing bugs , fixing 5 errors and creating 8 news ones...forgetting pieces of the source code.I had much better and stable results with GPT 01-Preview but it is limited to something like 25 questions max, then blocks you for a week...
@@intercoldebtcollectionagency I use claude and love it. Im guessing why gpt 01 is better for much more complex code as its able to look over it again and correct it self like a human does while claude doesn't have the ability to do so
Claude's generations are very good, but the lazy generations are quite annoying, and the longer the context, the worse it gets. Additionly, when using the web chat service (Claude Pro), the limits are too low, causing a project to be cut off in mid-flow is enraging. Both are unacceptable for any serious work.
I assure you that you cannot leave ChatGPT for coding. ChatGPT writes better code and explains better.
"Why Are Programmers are Switching from ChatGPT to Claude 3.5" the grammar of the title is not correct haha
There are two "are" pick one lol
When AI takes over, the first thing, people will forget to do is read and write. 😅
Guy used gpt to grammar check instead of claude
this is how you know it was written by a human!
this also is not programming... lol
Claude finished itself on august(laziness)
Like Jean Claude?
The title reads as if it was written by ai. Programmers are switching are to ai lol
Haha, yes, but Adrian's intelligence!
Companies should just remove the middle man and replace them with AI
AI wouldn't make that mistake. To err is human :)
For web designing, fancy and visually appealing work Claude is good but not for complex tasks. Where gpt perform better.
This video sounds like a sequence of ads.
This is so stupid is not worth a comment. Do we still doubt that we have reached a plateau?
Then i am sure you are fine betting 1k that there is no plateau
Frontend development shall be automated by AI
jeez, slow down, take a breath every few sentences. It's like listening to a hyper small dog. Yes, I get it, you can edit tight.. but, checked out after 1 minute of it - it's a wall of talking.
No one is switching gpt to Claude now don't get fool, GPT was still top till now.
I left the GPT subscription for Claude. Claude is much better. I also use Perplexity.
So where is the comparison to ChatGPT - I assume it can't do what Claude did or you're just trolling us 🧌