You have an uncanny ability to explain very advanced concepts from the ground up without any egregious omissions or simplifications. This is probably the best explanation of lasers short of a university course. I kind of wish you mentioned stellasers tough. Such a powerful and surprisingly straight-forward concept.
I want to look at them more scientifically first, since I study the solar corona. This video is a good basis to build on with regards to stellasers, though.
Damn, video was over way too soon. Truly riveting content and the fastest 20 minutes I spend this week. People from lab next door use lasers in Laser doppler anemometry and once gave me a tldr of how their lasers are used and it seemed fascinating. This does too, are you planning to shine more light on lasers in the future?
The only physics I was good at was optics in my undergrad. Love lasers and what backyard scientists and pyros of the styro nature get up to with them haha
@@GeoffryGifari they work with sprays - so there it is probably used to measure velocity of droplets. I'm sure it's more complicated than that, but my memory sux xD
Thank you very much. Gaining a better idea of how lasing works has always been a to-do for me, and seeing this video in my feed has given me the perfect chance. Now I want to build my own ruby laser.
It took me a while to reach this basic level of understanding of how lasing works, I would have understood it much better and quicker with this video, and in just 20 minutes! Great job! The salsa background music was also a random phenomena that was totally unexpected
This video was 20 minutes long?? It felt like five, really concise and easy to follow. I probably need to watch it a couple more times, but I feel like I finally get the gist of how most lasers operate. Thank you
Hell yes, I just listened to his lasers when this popped up. And he specifically said he was skipping the science. Truly the greatest accidental collab
I’ve looked at 19 videos on explaining lasers, this one is most complete and easiest to understand. I could learn basket weaving from a good teacher and this is a great one. (Awaiting his course on basket weaving). B.L. Md
2:30 "... the photons need to have almost exactly the energy..." Why almost? I've always understood it has to be exactly the energy between the states, do you mean almost as in the confines of the uncertainty principle or something else?
There is some wiggle room. One thing I didn't have time to talk about is line broadening. So for example, due to the thermal motion of the atoms, the photons will be Doppler shifted, some in one direction others in another.
Probably the most detailed video I have come accross. And without glaring mistakes. Interesting choice to mention Q-switching, before population inversion, but to leave out longitudinal modes.
I guess it's because I used to play a game about internet spaceships called EVE Online where they have "pulse" and "beam" lasers, which I presume are Q-switched and CW respectively.
Out of High school in mid 70's I got a job that made helium gas Lasers. Cool to watch the glass guy do his thing. Their main product was Laser marking machines for engraving and other low watt stuff. They had the flash lamp YAG lasers in it with Q switch. I think the company's name was Control Laser out of Florida. They sent a lot of their product to Sandia Labs in N.M.
Question, does istope content chage lasing properties of the medium? Does the medium need to be "encriched" to have only spacific isotope or the effect, if any, is too small to care?
Some questions for the community: 1. Would the length of the optical cavity being an integer multiple of laser wavelength produce an advantage? 2. When the laser reaches equilibrium, would the atoms emit photons in a synchronized way? or would it still be random (in other words, can the atoms themselves get correlated due to multiple passing stimulated emission?) 3. How different are the needs of a laser diode compared to a simple LED? Can a LED be turned into a laser diode? 4. For the free electron laser, does it still operate using transition between discrete energy levels? How does energy transition work in this case? 5. Will the straight beam of a laser light stay that way forever?
OK, I'll try: 1. Yes, you can do something called modelocking, which is related. 2. Yes, you can have some atoms more depleted than others where the electric field of the light is higher, if there is a standing wave. 3. Sort of, in that LEDs use spontaneous emission and diode lasers use stimulated. It's a bit like the Sodium light example. 4. There are no longer and energy levels, because the electrons are free and not in orbit around an atom. The laser light is no dependent on the spacing between the magnets, because this is the scale on which the electrons oscillate. 5. No, there is no way to make any beam of light perfectly straight. It will diffract outwards. A laser beam is still pretty good in this regard, but it will still form a cone of light, not a pure cylinder.
@@ImprobableMatter On the FEL case if stimulated emission can work continuously without fixed energy levels, I wonder if EM waves with laser characteristics (coherence, ...) can be produced for radio/microwave range using just wires, waveguides, antennas and such
Please make another video about the same topic but diving in more detail and discussing the divergence and how it's used in lithography and sci-fi technology like space lasers concentrating sun light on to metal infused glass rods to create lasers and other cool things done with lasers
Hello, off topic but, was wondering if you could do a show about General Fusion's LM26 machine? Looks like they've suddenly gone in a new direction, giving up on the piston compression idea. Now it's some kind of collapsible liner.
Watching on my phone during a break, in my uncomfortably hot cleanroom suit, inside the laser bay for the 2 kilojoule, 2 petawatt laser system, next to the 30kJ, 60 terawatt system seen here ruclips.net/video/IjC1CPiDLik/видео.html We are hoping to get funding soon for a 25 petawatt OPAL (Optical Parametric Amplifier Lines) system that would use three-wave mixing in noncollinear optical parametric amplifiers made of large slabs of KDP, and would allow ponderomotive acceleration of electrons to highly relativistic (>10GeV) energies in a single pulse over a few cm distance...among other exotic things.
@ImprobableMatter most of the time I am actually watching on desktop, and 8 years after introducing them, yt STILL gives no way of seeing these kinds of posts via that platform unless you go to each individual channel you're subscribed to and click on the community section. It's exasperating the way they run this site. So I'll have a look now.
I could have watched a whole course on this, fascinating stuff. One question though, why do the stimulated photons travel in the same direction and not come out heading in a random direction? I assume it's something to do with quantum mechanics that's way above my pay grade.
In very basic terms: the photon has an oscillating electric field; it makes the electron in the atom oscillate in the same direction; this makes a new photon with an oscillating field in the same direction.
Excuse me professor, when will you be bringing out the lasers for me to play with? And will we start with the small lasers, or can we just go straight to the big lasers first?
When i was 9, wevhad to give a small presentation in front if the class on anything we wanted. I chose lasers. It's fascinating to me that no one in my family has ever been into science, but when i first saw a chemistry kit as a kid, i wanted it SO badly Amazing how we are predisposed to like certain things. Anyway, im sure ny presentation was very simple and limited and wrong, but I do remember feeling like I was very smart when I told them what laser stood for. 😂
Cool video! I have some questions about stimulated emission and the 'avalanche' growth of photons in a gain medium. As I understand, photons are not exactly particles which travel in a fixed direction. There is always a wavefront. Can a wavefront stimulate two excited atoms at the same time? And how does the stimulated emission wavefront appear? Does it grow/amplify the incoming photon's wavefront amplitude?
Your question is really more a question about quantum mechanics in general. The answer is the same as if you imagined a beam of electrons being shot out of a particle accelerator and hitting a crystal. Can an electron interact with two different atoms? Yes. A photon is a quantum particle, which like all particles has something akin to a wavefunction - just like with protons and electrons, it is impossible to measure its position and momentum simultaneously. Actually, the laser is yet another proof of this aspect of quantum mechanics - it always puts out an integer number of such photons like 1,2,3..., never 1.5 for instance. Each photon interacts with atoms around it as it is travelling. It can in principle interact with two excited atoms and stimulate emission. There would then be two photons, but they would be highly correlated. Eventually you would have a beam of millions of photons and then it makes sense to talk about it in the classical sense of a beam of light, because all the quantum uncertainties would average out in a statistical sense.
@ImprobableMatter thank you! Never thought of it as I'm skewed by thinking of the delta v requirements of going out vs in as opposed to energy of the orbit.
While I would like to talk more about laser, given how important doping silicon is to our, microprocessors, photovoltaic solar cells, and now I find out that it effects laser too. I think that we need a video just to understand this important method of production. But back on the subject of laser, I would like to know what a frequency doubler is for a laser? Are they even real?
Yes, you can easily frequency double or triple laser light. It involves a type of crystal which will effectively turn two or three (depending on crystal type) photons into a single photon with double/triple the energy.
@@ImprobableMatter Is that way the wavelength of a laser changes? As the energy that a photon has is related to the wavelength of the photon. Also, what is the laser ablation cap? From what I understand it is when out gassing reduce the ability of material to absorb laser light.
Planets orbiting closer to the star must be moving faster to have a stable orbit thus they in fact have more kinetic energy (relative to mass), not less.
They have more kinetic energy, but less total energy. As the text in the video suggests, look up "virial theorem" for more information. Namely, KE = -1/2 PE
@@ImprobableMatter How can they have less total energy, if the only practical energy a planetary body has is kinetic energy? what is the rest of this "total energy" made of?
So if i want to make an electric (plasma) sword ⚔️🗡️. I need to make sure my crystal is long enough to produce a blade With enough power to become solid at x distance
What I mean is the science will tell you that electric is not completely understood and although you can have tech to the moon and back. Not everything is fully understood understood
How do we know the ground state is the ground state? Let me preface this in the fact that I am not a subject matter expert, I just like to read. The proton or nucleus of an atom is small in relative terms but a proton or nucleus with an "orbiting" electron is many times the diameter of just the nucleus, even at so called ground state. If, our current understanding of ground state is simply not true, that brings up many interesting prospects being energy could be extracted if we could control the process of manipulating atoms to a new lower ground state. This may also explain the missing mass of galaxies, the so called dark matter. Just me pondering some thoughts here.
It's because the Bohr model of the atom is wrong. Electrons don't actually orbit the nucleus in neat circular orbits since they are governed by wavefunctions so instead they occupy a probablistic cloud around the nucleus that passes through the nucleus as well. The Bohr model of the atom is useful as a teaching aid to illustrate the concept of energy levels but it doesn't accurately reflect what atoms are actually like. Also we know for absolutely certain what the energy levels are because they are governed by physical laws, this is the insight that made Bohr famous.
Glad you're back at videos. One the the hidden gem physics channels
Acollierastro in there hah
You have an uncanny ability to explain very advanced concepts from the ground up without any egregious omissions or simplifications. This is probably the best explanation of lasers short of a university course.
I kind of wish you mentioned stellasers tough. Such a powerful and surprisingly straight-forward concept.
I want to look at them more scientifically first, since I study the solar corona. This video is a good basis to build on with regards to stellasers, though.
I think if you kinda already know what he is talking about. It is easy to understand with his explanation
Daaang I was just re-watching your fusion series last night, urging more vids. Really enjoy your realism on all these things. Thanks!
Damn, video was over way too soon. Truly riveting content and the fastest 20 minutes I spend this week. People from lab next door use lasers in Laser doppler anemometry and once gave me a tldr of how their lasers are used and it seemed fascinating. This does too, are you planning to shine more light on lasers in the future?
Yes, with this video I wanted to lay the groundwork for any future discussion.
The only physics I was good at was optics in my undergrad. Love lasers and what backyard scientists and pyros of the styro nature get up to with them haha
Laser doppler anemometry? in what ways can it be applied?
@@GeoffryGifari they work with sprays - so there it is probably used to measure velocity of droplets.
I'm sure it's more complicated than that, but my memory sux xD
@@Profesor449one droplet at a time? pretty cool
Thank you very much. Gaining a better idea of how lasing works has always been a to-do for me, and seeing this video in my feed has given me the perfect chance. Now I want to build my own ruby laser.
It took me a while to reach this basic level of understanding of how lasing works, I would have understood it much better and quicker with this video, and in just 20 minutes! Great job!
The salsa background music was also a random phenomena that was totally unexpected
Thank you for posting this awesome video, I work with lasers (Raman spectroscopy) and this is the best material I ever found on the internet
This video was 20 minutes long?? It felt like five, really concise and easy to follow. I probably need to watch it a couple more times, but I feel like I finally get the gist of how most lasers operate. Thank you
This makes a good companion piece to Perun's last upload.
Hell yes, I just listened to his lasers when this popped up. And he specifically said he was skipping the science. Truly the greatest accidental collab
@@Profesor449 Now we just need a video concerning the science of microwave emitters
I’ve looked at 19 videos on explaining lasers, this one is most complete and easiest to understand. I could learn basket weaving from a good teacher and this is a great one. (Awaiting his course on basket weaving). B.L. Md
As a laser enthusiast, this video was pure bliss. Thank you for making this.
2:30 "... the photons need to have almost exactly the energy..."
Why almost? I've always understood it has to be exactly the energy between the states, do you mean almost as in the confines of the uncertainty principle or something else?
There is some wiggle room. One thing I didn't have time to talk about is line broadening. So for example, due to the thermal motion of the atoms, the photons will be Doppler shifted, some in one direction others in another.
I've been in laser manufacturing course for 6 months and I still learnt so much.
Probably the most detailed video I have come accross. And without glaring mistakes.
Interesting choice to mention Q-switching, before population inversion, but to leave out longitudinal modes.
I guess it's because I used to play a game about internet spaceships called EVE Online where they have "pulse" and "beam" lasers, which I presume are Q-switched and CW respectively.
@@ImprobableMatter Hahaha.. ok
Really well done.
13:21 😊 , nice 5th element reference.
This is one of my favorite science channels. Thank you for making this content for us all to enjoy
“Get ready for some more butt numbers” is gonna be the new 5th slide in my startup pitch deck
more videos and the end of the work week? sounds like heaven
I was in a ground state until this video hit me )
Your channel is so valuable for learning about physics and technology, thank you so much for all your hard work!
👍 Admirable primer, as always! Keep them coming!
I am very happy I have found this channel, great content, much appreciated.
Another superb video. Thank you for making it!!!
What an exceptional video. Thank you!
Your channel is fascinating! Please continue making videos
"The gain medium must also be a plasma, or it would soon become one."
Out of High school in mid 70's I got a job that made helium gas Lasers. Cool to watch the glass guy do his thing. Their main product was Laser marking machines for engraving and other low watt stuff. They had the flash lamp YAG lasers in it with Q switch. I think the company's name was Control Laser out of Florida. They sent a lot of their product to Sandia Labs in N.M.
you're lucky to not be my neighbor or something, I could ruin your days with questions
Question, does istope content chage lasing properties of the medium? Does the medium need to be "encriched" to have only spacific isotope or the effect, if any, is too small to care?
Not really. It's all to do with the orbital electrons which don't care too much about the isotope, only the number of protons.
Some questions for the community:
1. Would the length of the optical cavity being an integer multiple of laser wavelength produce an advantage?
2. When the laser reaches equilibrium, would the atoms emit photons in a synchronized way? or would it still be random (in other words, can the atoms themselves get correlated due to multiple passing stimulated emission?)
3. How different are the needs of a laser diode compared to a simple LED? Can a LED be turned into a laser diode?
4. For the free electron laser, does it still operate using transition between discrete energy levels? How does energy transition work in this case?
5. Will the straight beam of a laser light stay that way forever?
OK, I'll try:
1. Yes, you can do something called modelocking, which is related.
2. Yes, you can have some atoms more depleted than others where the electric field of the light is higher, if there is a standing wave.
3. Sort of, in that LEDs use spontaneous emission and diode lasers use stimulated. It's a bit like the Sodium light example.
4. There are no longer and energy levels, because the electrons are free and not in orbit around an atom. The laser light is no dependent on the spacing between the magnets, because this is the scale on which the electrons oscillate.
5. No, there is no way to make any beam of light perfectly straight. It will diffract outwards. A laser beam is still pretty good in this regard, but it will still form a cone of light, not a pure cylinder.
@@ImprobableMatter Thank you for the answers, and please don't feel forced.
Maybe other commenters who work in the field can give their two cents
@@ImprobableMatter On the FEL case if stimulated emission can work continuously without fixed energy levels, I wonder if EM waves with laser characteristics (coherence, ...) can be produced for radio/microwave range using just wires, waveguides, antennas and such
A bit like a phased array antenna?
@@ImprobableMatter Hmmm I'll look into that
Please make another video about the same topic but diving in more detail and discussing the divergence and how it's used in lithography and sci-fi technology like space lasers concentrating sun light on to metal infused glass rods to create lasers and other cool things done with lasers
Thks & over my head;
Question, ?Would a good intuitive description of atomic particles frozen/localized light?
Hello, off topic but, was wondering if you could do a show about General Fusion's LM26 machine? Looks like they've suddenly gone in a new direction, giving up on the piston compression idea. Now it's some kind of collapsible liner.
Watching on my phone during a break, in my uncomfortably hot cleanroom suit, inside the laser bay for the 2 kilojoule, 2 petawatt laser system, next to the 30kJ, 60 terawatt system seen here
ruclips.net/video/IjC1CPiDLik/видео.html
We are hoping to get funding soon for a 25 petawatt OPAL (Optical Parametric Amplifier Lines) system that would use three-wave mixing in noncollinear optical parametric amplifiers made of large slabs of KDP, and would allow ponderomotive acceleration of electrons to highly relativistic (>10GeV) energies in a single pulse over a few cm distance...among other exotic things.
I don't know if you saw, but I posted a link into my community tab, to a talk I did with the Astrophysical Journal. Free-range, applied MHD there.
@ImprobableMatter most of the time I am actually watching on desktop, and 8 years after introducing them, yt STILL gives no way of seeing these kinds of posts via that platform unless you go to each individual channel you're subscribed to and click on the community section. It's exasperating the way they run this site. So I'll have a look now.
Since a laser beam is collimated does it obey the inverse square law?
@@sodakjohn yes, in the farfield all light sources do because of the diffraction limit of the output aperture.
I could have watched a whole course on this, fascinating stuff. One question though, why do the stimulated photons travel in the same direction and not come out heading in a random direction? I assume it's something to do with quantum mechanics that's way above my pay grade.
In very basic terms: the photon has an oscillating electric field; it makes the electron in the atom oscillate in the same direction; this makes a new photon with an oscillating field in the same direction.
Excuse me professor, when will you be bringing out the lasers for me to play with? And will we start with the small lasers, or can we just go straight to the big lasers first?
Brilliant video. Going to build simulated lasers in a video game
When i was 9, wevhad to give a small presentation in front if the class on anything we wanted.
I chose lasers. It's fascinating to me that no one in my family has ever been into science, but when i first saw a chemistry kit as a kid, i wanted it SO badly
Amazing how we are predisposed to like certain things.
Anyway, im sure ny presentation was very simple and limited and wrong, but I do remember feeling like I was very smart when I told them what laser stood for. 😂
Cool video! I have some questions about stimulated emission and the 'avalanche' growth of photons in a gain medium.
As I understand, photons are not exactly particles which travel in a fixed direction. There is always a wavefront. Can a wavefront stimulate two excited atoms at the same time? And how does the stimulated emission wavefront appear? Does it grow/amplify the incoming photon's wavefront amplitude?
Your question is really more a question about quantum mechanics in general. The answer is the same as if you imagined a beam of electrons being shot out of a particle accelerator and hitting a crystal. Can an electron interact with two different atoms? Yes.
A photon is a quantum particle, which like all particles has something akin to a wavefunction - just like with protons and electrons, it is impossible to measure its position and momentum simultaneously. Actually, the laser is yet another proof of this aspect of quantum mechanics - it always puts out an integer number of such photons like 1,2,3..., never 1.5 for instance.
Each photon interacts with atoms around it as it is travelling. It can in principle interact with two excited atoms and stimulate emission. There would then be two photons, but they would be highly correlated. Eventually you would have a beam of millions of photons and then it makes sense to talk about it in the classical sense of a beam of light, because all the quantum uncertainties would average out in a statistical sense.
@@ImprobableMatter Wow, thanks for the super detailed answer!
If i add magnet can i limit how far the photons go.
Wait, how do slower moving planets in the outer solar system have more energy? Is it gravitational potential energy combined with their velocity?
Yes, exactly.
@ImprobableMatter thank you! Never thought of it as I'm skewed by thinking of the delta v requirements of going out vs in as opposed to energy of the orbit.
great video, thanks
Beautiful!
Yooo new Improbable Matter content! 🎉
holy fuck WE have missed you!
While I would like to talk more about laser, given how important doping silicon is to our, microprocessors, photovoltaic solar cells, and now I find out that it effects laser too. I think that we need a video just to understand this important method of production.
But back on the subject of laser, I would like to know what a frequency doubler is for a laser? Are they even real?
Yes, you can easily frequency double or triple laser light. It involves a type of crystal which will effectively turn two or three (depending on crystal type) photons into a single photon with double/triple the energy.
@@ImprobableMatter Is that way the wavelength of a laser changes? As the energy that a photon has is related to the wavelength of the photon. Also, what is the laser ablation cap? From what I understand it is when out gassing reduce the ability of material to absorb laser light.
Thank you!
"Get ready for some more butt numbers" is my new favorite saying :D Awesome video
Why not a 5 level laser or higher?
I like that you used the Dutch national flag as an example for the color scheme of the semiconductor laser. 🤔
This is the good stuff
Planets orbiting closer to the star must be moving faster to have a stable orbit thus they in fact have more kinetic energy (relative to mass), not less.
They have more kinetic energy, but less total energy. As the text in the video suggests, look up "virial theorem" for more information. Namely, KE = -1/2 PE
@@ImprobableMatter How can they have less total energy, if the only practical energy a planetary body has is kinetic energy? what is the rest of this "total energy" made of?
Potential energy.
Virial... Acollierastro taught me that word and it is still mysterious
So if i want to make an electric (plasma) sword ⚔️🗡️. I need to make sure my crystal is long enough to produce a blade With enough power to become solid at x distance
dude you are so goated
17:00 EUV Lithography comes to mind
How is this channel so small
they usually don't work
they usually do actually
The dam fempto never wants to work when it is raining outside, no matter how well I control the humidity
:.))@@Anohaxer
So glad I could buy a laser at a fair growing up 😂
I don't get this comment 😅
Awesome
8:40 a twofer yeah.
"So, back to pumping!"
Don't teach a course on lasers in Scotland.
13:20 - "Like"
Dude, this video ist awesome. I seriously owe you a gallon of beer! I mean it. Feel free to contact me so I can return a favor.
What I mean is the science will tell you that electric is not completely understood and although you can have tech to the moon and back. Not everything is fully understood understood
Need video in 4k, how work modern smartphone laptop...
I have a totally wrong understanding of atomic structure but I’m a construction worker it ok
Stimulating!
15:57 gekoloniseerd
I see....
How do we know the ground state is the ground state? Let me preface this in the fact that I am not a subject matter expert, I just like to read. The proton or nucleus of an atom is small in relative terms but a proton or nucleus with an "orbiting" electron is many times the diameter of just the nucleus, even at so called ground state. If, our current understanding of ground state is simply not true, that brings up many interesting prospects being energy could be extracted if we could control the process of manipulating atoms to a new lower ground state. This may also explain the missing mass of galaxies, the so called dark matter. Just me pondering some thoughts here.
It's because the Bohr model of the atom is wrong. Electrons don't actually orbit the nucleus in neat circular orbits since they are governed by wavefunctions so instead they occupy a probablistic cloud around the nucleus that passes through the nucleus as well. The Bohr model of the atom is useful as a teaching aid to illustrate the concept of energy levels but it doesn't accurately reflect what atoms are actually like. Also we know for absolutely certain what the energy levels are because they are governed by physical laws, this is the insight that made Bohr famous.